Official Ratings/Rankings of ÖTTV, NÖTTV, STTV, KTTV, BTTV, TTTV, StTTV, WTTV, VTTV, OÖTTV, TTQ, TTSA, TTTA, TTV, and ELTTL.
Ratings Central: The World’s Most Accurate Rating SystemHealth, Wellness and Table Tennis
HomePlayersEventsClubsPro PlayersInfo

2004 USA Olympic Singles Trials
2004-01-13
Detailed Report

Hazinski, MarkRating Change
2445±120 + 146 = 2591±53
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+1032671±69Xiao, Han−15 5 6 3 4−392543±54Reed, Barney7 6 −7 −9 9 10
+452581±64Hugh, Adam7 −8 9 6 9−112634±62Nguyen, Khoa7 9 9 −8 −9 9
+262557±60Owens, Eric−8 8 6 −3 11 6−42698±65Zhuang, David2 8 8 6
+122482±61Rop, Darko7 7 9 802941±123Lupulesku, Ilija10 −10 −9 7 6 8
+72453±61Leibovitz, Tahl2 −10 3 5 1
+42398±71Pace, Brian4 7 −9 3 7
+22338±81Jain, Ashu6 8 8 −8 −8 3
 
Hugh, AdamRating Change
2302±186 + 255 = 2557±55
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+2042668±68Xiao, Han8 8 9 5−422527±58Owens, Eric8 −9 −6 13 −4 9 6
+682573±54Reed, Barney8 −5 −8 9 5 −6 10−152569±60Hazinski, Mark7 −8 9 6 9
+242484±60Rop, Darko−8 4 12 9 −8 7−52637±61Nguyen, Khoa13 −4 12 −12 5 6
+142456±60Leibovitz, Tahl7 10 7 9−22700±64Zhuang, David−9 8 4 10 3
+72404±70Pace, Brian11 2 8 702942±123Lupulesku, Ilija6 9 5 2
+42346±79Jain, Ashu−7 7 9 8 −8 −10 3
 
Jain, AshuRating Change
2461±134 − 112 = 2349±69
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+542396±71Pace, Brian9 6 −11 8 8−912416±63Leibovitz, Tahl5 8 −9 3 −6 −9 11
−372444±62Rop, Darko7 −9 7 −8 6 7
−132520±60Owens, Eric9 3 6 4
−82538±64Hugh, Adam−7 7 9 8 −8 −10 3
−72543±54Reed, Barney10 6 8 7
−52563±61Hazinski, Mark6 8 8 −8 −8 3
−22620±65Xiao, Han10 7 9 5
−22633±62Nguyen, Khoa2 9 12 10
−12697±65Zhuang, David6 6 4 7
02941±123Lupulesku, Ilija3 3 2 4
 
Leibovitz, TahlRating Change
2450±100 − 6 = 2444±54
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+602559±60Owens, Eric−11 9 −11 −9 5 8 3−732336±80Pace, Brian−9 −7 9 −10 6 8 6
+332484±61Rop, Darko10 −7 −7 9 5 −12 12−132538±64Hugh, Adam7 10 7 9
+102338±81Jain, Ashu5 8 −9 3 −6 −9 11−102543±54Reed, Barney−9 5 −9 10 −7 4 9
−62563±62Hazinski, Mark2 −10 3 5 1
−32621±65Xiao, Han12 5 2 9
−22634±62Nguyen, Khoa7 6 8 −9 6
−12698±65Zhuang, David6 7 8 −10 8
02942±123Lupulesku, Ilija7 6 6 4
 
Lupulesku, IlijaRating Change
2819±171 + 113 = 2932±122
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+682711±66Zhuang, David8 6 7 7
+192646±62Nguyen, Khoa9 4 −7 9 8
+122634±65Xiao, Han10 3 5 4
+52577±60Hazinski, Mark10 −10 −9 7 6 8
+32554±53Reed, Barney12 3 8 8
+32554±62Hugh, Adam6 9 5 2
+22534±58Owens, Eric3 5 10 8
+12464±59Rop, Darko9 9 2 4
02437±59Leibovitz, Tahl7 6 6 4
02382±70Pace, Brian6 4 6 −7 6
02323±79Jain, Ashu3 3 2 4
 
Nguyen, KhoaRating Change
2550±100 + 86 = 2636±54
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+542596±63Hazinski, Mark7 9 9 −8 −9 9−352613±66Xiao, Han8 7 −9 −9 9 6
+302573±65Hugh, Adam13 −4 12 −12 5 6−122693±65Zhuang, David6 −9 −11 7 4 13
+212567±54Reed, Barney8 8 11 −17 −7 7−12939±124Lupulesku, Ilija9 4 −7 9 8
+142549±60Owens, Eric−6 14 12 −5 6 −8 7
+62474±61Rop, Darko11 −7 −7 −6 9 6 7
+42446±61Leibovitz, Tahl7 6 8 −9 6
+22389±71Pace, Brian7 4 9 7
+12329±80Jain, Ashu2 9 12 10
 
Owens, EricRating Change
2551±118 − 20 = 2531±53
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+822742±70Zhuang, David5 9 14 7−1272327±80Pace, Brian−4 4 8 −11 13 −9 5
+462570±64Hugh, Adam8 −9 −6 13 −4 9 6−532405±63Leibovitz, Tahl−11 9 −11 −9 5 8 3
+332566±54Reed, Barney6 5 7 −4 9−112555±62Hazinski, Mark−8 8 6 −3 11 6
+142473±61Rop, Darko−3 8 −13 6 9 9−52613±65Xiao, Han12 9 4 9
+32329±80Jain, Ashu9 3 6 4−32627±62Nguyen, Khoa−6 14 12 −5 6 −8 7
02938±124Lupulesku, Ilija3 5 10 8
 
Pace, BrianRating Change
2391±130 + 2 = 2393±63
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+1012560±60Owens, Eric−4 4 8 −11 13 −9 5−1072273±92Jain, Ashu9 6 −11 8 8
+462457±61Leibovitz, Tahl−9 −7 9 −10 6 8 6−212449±62Rop, Darko9 −7 −9 4 7 2
−62542±63Hugh, Adam11 2 8 7
−52546±54Reed, Barney7 9 7 11
−32566±61Hazinski, Mark4 7 −9 3 7
−22623±64Xiao, Han−10 −11 1 8 −10 9 6
−12636±62Nguyen, Khoa7 4 9 7
02699±64Zhuang, David7 3 2 5
02942±123Lupulesku, Ilija6 4 6 −7 6
 
Reed, BarneyRating Change
2664±76 − 129 = 2535±47
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+272585±63Hazinski, Mark7 6 −7 −9 9 10−712414±64Rop, Darko10 −5 9 −6 −7 8 9
+92439±60Leibovitz, Tahl−9 5 −9 10 −7 4 9−442493±61Owens, Eric6 5 7 −4 9
+52383±70Pace, Brian7 9 7 11−292509±66Hugh, Adam8 −5 −8 9 5 −6 10
+22323±79Jain, Ashu10 6 8 7−132595±66Xiao, Han−7 6 11 6 −4 4
−92611±64Nguyen, Khoa8 8 11 −17 −7 7
−42680±67Zhuang, David4 6 −7 5 9
02932±126Lupulesku, Ilija12 3 8 8
 
Rop, DarkoRating Change
2530±103 − 72 = 2458±54
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+522568±54Reed, Barney10 −5 9 −6 −7 8 9−832404±64Leibovitz, Tahl10 −7 −7 9 5 −12 12
+162391±71Pace, Brian9 −7 −9 4 7 2−272512±61Owens, Eric−3 8 −13 6 9 9
+82330±80Jain, Ashu7 −9 7 −8 6 7−162530±65Hugh, Adam−8 4 12 9 −8 7
−102556±62Hazinski, Mark7 7 9 8
−52615±65Xiao, Han7 −12 7 7 9
−42629±63Nguyen, Khoa11 −7 −7 −6 9 6 7
−12694±65Zhuang, David9 7 4 6
02940±124Lupulesku, Ilija9 9 2 4
 
Xiao, HanRating Change
2705±152 − 85 = 2620±58
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+812652±63Nguyen, Khoa8 7 −9 −9 9 6−1642521±64Hugh, Adam8 8 9 5
+332557±53Reed, Barney−7 6 11 6 −4 4−592547±62Hazinski, Mark−15 5 6 3 4
+192537±58Owens, Eric12 9 4 9−122683±65Zhuang, David−9 9 6 3 7
+82466±60Rop, Darko7 −12 7 7 9−12924±125Lupulesku, Ilija10 3 5 4
+52439±60Leibovitz, Tahl12 5 2 9
+32384±70Pace, Brian−10 −11 1 8 −10 9 6
+12324±79Jain, Ashu10 7 9 5
 
Zhuang, DavidRating Change
2641±102 + 55 = 2696±59
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+612661±65Nguyen, Khoa6 −9 −11 7 4 13−882501±61Owens, Eric5 9 14 7
+372650±69Xiao, Han−9 9 6 3 7−22933±125Lupulesku, Ilija8 6 7 7
+182586±62Hazinski, Mark2 8 8 6
+122563±64Hugh, Adam−9 8 4 10 3
+92560±54Reed, Barney4 6 −7 5 9
+32468±60Rop, Darko9 7 4 6
+22440±60Leibovitz, Tahl6 7 8 −10 8
+12384±70Pace, Brian7 3 2 5
02324±79Jain, Ashu6 6 4 7

Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating

Players: 12. Matches: 66. State: Pennsylvania. Country: United States (USA). Director: O’Neill, Sean. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 1149. Submitted/revised: 2005-04-19 11:25 pm EDT. Last processed: 2016-06-06 9:20 am EDT.