2016-5-14 Annual Tournament Singles
2016-05-14
Detailed Report

• Bacuyani, Daniel
• Rating Change
  1450​±250 − 373 = 1077​±103
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +133
• 1207​±115
• Halter, Neil
• 6 8 10
• −452
• 938​±100
• Williams, Chad
• 7 6 7
• −42
• 1166​±137
• Porter, Preston
• 4 4 3
• −11
• 1276​±99
• Root, Phill
• 9 6 −17 8
•  
• Bayles, Philip
• Rating Change
  1295​±51 − 45 = 1250​±44
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −17
• 1259​±81
• Carlton, Rick
• 7 7 7
• −11
• 1290​±93
• Deuel, Gary
• 7 7 10
• −10
• 1306​±59
• Thompson, Curtis G
• 2 5 7
• −7
• 1339​±61
• Crump, Todd
• 7 2 7
•  
• Benedick, Larry
• Rating Change
  1476​±60 − 31 = 1445​±51
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +3
• 1241​±68
• Downes, Jett
• 4 9 9
• −23
• 1440​±67
• Epstein, Howard
• 10 −11 9 5
• 0
• 1035​±48
• Sample, Paul
• 5 6 −11 8
• −11
• 1516​±83
• Van Duesen, Bob
• 4 11 7
•  
• Borror, Raymond L.
• Rating Change
  1410​±56 + 4 = 1414​±47
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +12
• 1352​±68
• Mitchell, Tom
• 9 6 7
• −19
• 1408​±52
• Sheldon, Elizabeth
• 4 10 −12 3
• +6
• 1290​±46
• Enders, Joe
• 7 7 6
• +5
• 1278​±45
• LaBrecque, Tim
• −11 6 4 5
•  
• Brzezinski, Richard
• Rating Change
  1118​±63 + 87 = 1205​±72
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +57
• 1432​±60
• Pittman, Mike
• 10 8 −11 −11 9
• −1
• 1523​±112
• Knight, Cody
• 7 7 5
• +31
• 1261​±106
• Cooney, Evan
• 6 9 −14 7
• 0
• 1765​±115
• Chen, Shi Ping
• 1 5 7
•  
• Bunyi, Harold
• Rating Change
  1603​±85 − 48 = 1555​±63
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +4
• 1319​±103
• Vincent, Ronald
• 9 −11 6 11
• −33
• 1609​±84
• Patel, Samir
• 8 −11 5 8
• −13
• 1682​±85
• Van Duesen, John
• 7 −12 8 −11 9
• −6
• 1761​±114
• Su, Qiancheng
• 9 2 6
•  
• Carlton, Rick
• Rating Change
  1319​±118 − 4 = 1315​±68
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +61
• 1381​±94
• Deuel, Gary
• 8 9 −11 8
• −65
• 1309​±57
• Thompson, Curtis G
• 5 −12 10 4
• +27
• 1263​±46
• Bayles, Philip
• 7 7 7
• −27
• 1341​±60
• Crump, Todd
• 9 −12 8 7
•  
• Chen, Shi Ping
• Rating Change
  1742​±120 + 40 = 1782​±113
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +19
• 1558​±89
• Van Duesen, Bob
• 2 3 −11 0
• +15
• 1551​±126
• Knight, Cody
• 7 7 5
• +2
• 1425​±50
• Sheldon, Elizabeth
• 6 11 −11 3
• +1
• 1384​±59
• Pittman, Mike
• 7 8 7
• +1
• 1377​±50
• Cooney, Steve
• 8 8 −11 3
• +1
• 1325​±58
• Thompson, Curtis G
• 8 6 6
• 0
• 1203​±71
• Brzezinski, Richard
• 1 5 7
• 0
• 1166​±95
• Cooney, Evan
• 6 6 4
•  
• Chen, Tianwei
• Rating Change
  1883​±106 + 49 = 1932​±104
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +34
• 1846​±138
• Su, Qiancheng
• −11 5 8 9 10
• +13
• 1718​±86
• Van Duesen, John
• 6 6 2
• +1
• 1510​±88
• Lange, Orion
• 4 1 6
• 0
• 1419​±80
• Purdy, Sean
• 4 7 5
• 0
• 1346​±98
• Wang, Harvey
• 1 3 6
•  
• Cooney, Evan
• Rating Change
  1340​±136 − 156 = 1184​±93
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −131
• 1168​±65
• Brzezinski, Richard
• 6 9 −14 7
• −19
• 1370​±61
• Pittman, Mike
• 2 3 −11 7
• −5
• 1500​±119
• Knight, Cody
• 7 3 9
• 0
• 1763​±115
• Chen, Shi Ping
• 6 6 4
•  
• Cooney, Steve
• Rating Change
  1318​±69 + 77 = 1395​±49
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +48
• 1651​±108
• Mahler, Bob
• −11 11 2 11
• −14
• 1416​±51
• Sheldon, Elizabeth
• 5 8 4
• +35
• 1488​±52
• Lugert, Eric
• 10 −11 9 8
• −10
• 1428​±46
• Murphy, Kevin
• 4 9 10
• +14
• 1354​±70
• Thompson, Curtis G
• −11 7 8 5
• −3
• 1539​±81
• Van Duesen, Bob
• 4 8 −12 8
• +7
• 1277​±107
• Meyer, Robert
• 7 8 −11 4
• 0
• 1765​±115
• Chen, Shi Ping
• 8 8 −11 3
•  
• Crump, Todd
• Rating Change
  1386​±74 − 40 = 1346​±54
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +20
• 1324​±80
• Carlton, Rick
• 9 −12 8 7
• −41
• 1271​±91
• Deuel, Gary
• 6 7 2
• +11
• 1260​±46
• Bayles, Philip
• 7 2 7
• −30
• 1297​±57
• Thompson, Curtis G
• 5 7 −11 9
•  
• Deuel, Gary
• Rating Change
  1436​±186 − 109 = 1327​±77
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +99
• 1365​±60
• Crump, Todd
• 6 7 2
• −185
• 1268​±76
• Carlton, Rick
• 8 9 −11 8
• +32
• 1259​±46
• Bayles, Philip
• 7 7 10
• −54
• 1307​±56
• Thompson, Curtis G
• 4 7 3
•  
• Downes, Jett
• Rating Change
  1346​±81 − 100 = 1246​±68
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −84
• 1002​±48
• Sample, Paul
• 7 −11 −11 6 8
• −8
• 1436​±52
• Benedick, Larry
• 4 9 9
• −5
• 1459​±66
• Epstein, Howard
• 3 4 6
• −2
• 1536​±82
• Van Duesen, Bob
• 4 7 7
•  
• Enders, Joe
• Rating Change
  1290​±53 − 8 = 1282​±45
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 1286​±46
• LaBrecque, Tim
• 8 −11 −11 11 9
• −14
• 1311​±69
• Mitchell, Tom
• 11 5 5
• −5
• 1411​±49
• Borror, Raymond L.
• 7 7 6
• −4
• 1418​±51
• Sheldon, Elizabeth
• −11 −13 10 8 10
•  
• Epstein, Howard
• Rating Change
  1462​±78 + 12 = 1474​±64
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +31
• 1460​±54
• Benedick, Larry
• 10 −11 9 5
• −22
• 1521​±82
• Van Duesen, Bob
• 8 10 −11 6
• +4
• 1243​±68
• Downes, Jett
• 3 4 6
• 0
• 1035​±48
• Sample, Paul
• 2 12 4
•  
• Flowers, Steve
• Rating Change
  1156​±94 − 48 = 1108​±78
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −38
• 1164​±93
• Jones, Jerry
• −11 2 6 −12 9
• −6
• 1365​±84
• Steele, Tyler
• 11 8 6
• −5
• 1372​±98
• Goodyear, Susan
• 3 5 0
•  
• Goodyear, Susan
• Rating Change
  1425​±138 − 87 = 1338​±80
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +27
• 1214​±92
• Jones, Jerry
• 6 8 10
• −70*
• 1308​±86
• Steele, Tyler
• 2 −16 −11 8 6
• +19
• 1210​±119
• Halter, Neil
• −12 9 6 6
• −70*
• 1308​±86
• Steele, Tyler
• 11 8 6
• +6
• 1097​±80
• Flowers, Steve
• 3 5 0
•  
• Halter, Neil
• Rating Change
  1450​±250 − 302 = 1148​±91
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +137
• 1287​±139
• Porter, Preston
• 8 13 8
• −407
• 959​±139
• Bacuyani, Daniel
• 6 8 10
• +26
• 1008​±88
• Williams, Chad
• 6 8 6
• −25*
• 1266​±99
• Root, Phill
• 11 7 6
• −25*
• 1266​±99
• Root, Phill
• −11 −11 9 11 8
• −8
• 1351​±95
• Goodyear, Susan
• −12 9 6 6
•  
• Jones, Jerry
• Rating Change
  1053​±108 + 163 = 1216​±87
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +134
• 1485​±105
• Steele, Tyler
• 4 −11 7 12
• −5
• 1379​±96
• Goodyear, Susan
• 6 8 10
• +34
• 1140​±85
• Flowers, Steve
• −11 2 6 −12 9
•  
• Knight, Cody
• Rating Change
  1369​±189 + 133 = 1502​±115
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +130
• 1397​±60
• Pittman, Mike
• 9 11 2
• −17
• 1760​±115
• Chen, Shi Ping
• 7 7 5
• +12
• 1215​±78
• Brzezinski, Richard
• 7 7 5
• +7
• 1180​±98
• Cooney, Evan
• 7 3 9
•  
• LaBrecque, Tim
• Rating Change
  1310​±51 − 40 = 1270​±44
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −20
• 1268​±48
• Enders, Joe
• 8 −11 −11 11 9
• −12
• 1307​±69
• Mitchell, Tom
• 11 11 9
• −4
• 1409​±50
• Borror, Raymond L.
• −11 6 4 5
• −4
• 1417​±51
• Sheldon, Elizabeth
• 6 7 3
•  
• Lange, Orion
• Rating Change
  1594​±113 − 96 = 1498​±86
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +19
• 1357​±103
• Wang, Harvey
• 3 −11 8 6
• −115
• 1355​±78
• Purdy, Sean
• 7 9 10
• −1
• 1904​±104
• Chen, Tianwei
• 4 1 6
•  
• Lugert, Eric
• Rating Change
  1475​±57 − 23 = 1452​±47
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +16
• 1445​±48
• Murphy, Kevin
• 7 9 2
• −32
• 1348​±52
• Cooney, Steve
• 10 −11 9 8
• +3
• 1244​±103
• Meyer, Robert
• 3 7 9
• −10
• 1515​±81
• Mahler, Bob
• 1 −11 6 9
•  
• Mahler, Bob
• Rating Change
  1595​±120 − 63 = 1532​±76
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +41
• 1465​±50
• Lugert, Eric
• 1 −11 6 9
• −130
• 1348​±52
• Cooney, Steve
• −11 11 2 11
• +23
• 1438​±46
• Murphy, Kevin
• 10 −11 9 9
• +3
• 1238​±101
• Meyer, Robert
• 9 7 7
•  
• Meyer, Robert
• Rating Change
  1379​±153 − 139 = 1240​±98
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −96
• 1365​±51
• Cooney, Steve
• 7 8 −11 4
• −26
• 1427​±46
• Murphy, Kevin
• 5 1 4
• −13
• 1452​±49
• Lugert, Eric
• 3 7 9
• −5
• 1531​±78
• Mahler, Bob
• 9 7 7
•  
• Mitchell, Tom
• Rating Change
  1304​±93 + 25 = 1329​±61
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +39
• 1296​±47
• Enders, Joe
• 11 5 5
• −23
• 1410​±49
• Borror, Raymond L.
• 9 6 7
• +23
• 1283​±46
• LaBrecque, Tim
• 11 11 9
• −14
• 1417​±51
• Sheldon, Elizabeth
• 7 7 8
•  
• Murphy, Kevin
• Rating Change
  1437​±51 − 8 = 1429​±44
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +11
• 1388​±53
• Cooney, Steve
• 4 9 10
• −15
• 1445​±50
• Lugert, Eric
• 7 9 2
• +3
• 1249​±104
• Meyer, Robert
• 5 1 4
• −6
• 1522​±81
• Mahler, Bob
• 10 −11 9 9
•  
• Patel, Samir
• Rating Change
  1691​±115 − 52 = 1639​±77
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +27
• 1567​±69
• Bunyi, Harold
• 8 −11 5 8
• −61
• 1670​±85
• Van Duesen, John
• −11 5 4 2
• +2
• 1315​±102
• Vincent, Ronald
• 3 −11 16 7
• −21
• 1743​±114
• Su, Qiancheng
• −11 9 1 9
•  
• Pittman, Mike
• Rating Change
  1442​±66 − 64 = 1378​±59
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +5
• 1172​±99
• Cooney, Evan
• 2 3 −11 7
• −55
• 1147​±60
• Brzezinski, Richard
• 10 8 −11 −11 9
• −12
• 1454​±132
• Knight, Cody
• 9 11 2
• −1
• 1761​±116
• Chen, Shi Ping
• 7 8 7
•  
• Porter, Preston
• Rating Change
  1450​±250 − 274 = 1176​±104
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +81
• 1084​±120
• Bacuyani, Daniel
• 4 4 3
• −333
• 1114​±121
• Halter, Neil
• 8 13 8
• +28
• 1008​±88
• Williams, Chad
• 5 9 7
• −50
• 1276​±99
• Root, Phill
• 11 −11 7 7
•  
• Purdy, Sean
• Rating Change
  1322​±87 + 118 = 1440​±84
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +85
• 1609​±100
• Lange, Orion
• 7 9 10
• −2
• 1703​±81
• Van Duesen, John
• 10 −11 −11 9 7 8
• +36
• 1427​±112
• Wang, Harvey
• 3 8 5
• −1
• 1782​±107
• Su, Qiancheng
• 5 8 6 10
• 0
• 1908​±104
• Chen, Tianwei
• 4 7 5
•  
• Root, Phill
• Rating Change
  1156​±124 + 167 = 1323​±84
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +96
• 1456​±172
• Porter, Preston
• 11 −11 7 7
• −21
• 1364​±84
• Steele, Tyler
• −11 9 6 9
• +37*
• 1352​±140
• Halter, Neil
• 11 7 6
• +37*
• 1352​±140
• Halter, Neil
• −11 −11 9 11 8
• +13
• 1138​±138
• Bacuyani, Daniel
• 9 6 −17 8
• +4
• 1022​±92
• Williams, Chad
• 6 −11 8 6
•  
• Sample, Paul
• Rating Change
  1003​±48 + 32 = 1035​±48
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +32
• 1300​±66
• Downes, Jett
• 7 −11 −11 6 8
• 0
• 1444​±51
• Benedick, Larry
• 5 6 −11 8
• 0
• 1469​±63
• Epstein, Howard
• 2 12 4
• 0
• 1544​±80
• Van Duesen, Bob
• 4 4 3
•  
• Sheldon, Elizabeth
• Rating Change
  1439​±69 + 4 = 1443​±48
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +28
• 1431​±53
• Borror, Raymond L.
• 4 10 −12 3
• −47
• 1291​±55
• Thompson, Curtis G
• 11 11 −11 13
• +16
• 1388​±52
• Cooney, Steve
• 5 8 4
• −9
• 1524​±83
• Van Duesen, Bob
• 5 −11 −11 5 6
• +9
• 1348​±67
• Mitchell, Tom
• 7 7 8
• −1
• 1761​±116
• Chen, Shi Ping
• 6 11 −11 3
• +5
• 1289​±46
• Enders, Joe
• −11 −13 10 8 10
• +4
• 1277​±45
• LaBrecque, Tim
• 6 7 3
•  
• Steele, Tyler
• Rating Change
  1399​±116 + 11 = 1410​±80
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +52*
• 1489​±133
• Goodyear, Susan
• 2 −16 −11 8 6
• −124
• 1120​±89
• Jones, Jerry
• 4 −11 7 12
• +52*
• 1489​±133
• Goodyear, Susan
• 11 8 6
• +28
• 1360​±113
• Root, Phill
• −11 9 6 9
• +2
• 1098​±80
• Flowers, Steve
• 11 8 6
•  
• Su, Qiancheng
• Rating Change
  1450​±250 + 349 = 1799​±104
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +300
• 1742​±87
• Van Duesen, John
• −12 3 12 8
• −28
• 1905​±104
• Chen, Tianwei
• −11 5 8 9 10
• +58
• 1676​±88
• Patel, Samir
• −11 9 1 9
• +15
• 1573​±68
• Bunyi, Harold
• 9 2 6
• +3
• 1437​±85
• Purdy, Sean
• 5 8 6 10
• +1
• 1332​±103
• Vincent, Ronald
• 6 −18 8 3
•  
• Thompson, Curtis G
• Rating Change
  1202​±68 + 164 = 1366​±64
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +55
• 1457​±52
• Sheldon, Elizabeth
• 11 11 −11 13
• −7
• 1372​±51
• Cooney, Steve
• −11 7 8 5
• +39
• 1429​±100
• Deuel, Gary
• 4 7 3
• −1
• 1543​±80
• Van Duesen, Bob
• 7 −11 7 5
• +38
• 1400​±65
• Crump, Todd
• 5 7 −11 9
• 0
• 1765​±115
• Chen, Shi Ping
• 8 6 6
• +26
• 1363​±82
• Carlton, Rick
• 5 −12 10 4
• +14
• 1273​±47
• Bayles, Philip
• 2 5 7
•  
• Van Duesen, Bob
• Rating Change
  1349​±125 + 209 = 1558​±79
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +114
• 1506​±72
• Epstein, Howard
• 8 10 −11 6
• −4
• 1763​±115
• Chen, Shi Ping
• 2 3 −11 0
• +51
• 1464​±53
• Benedick, Larry
• 4 11 7
• +27
• 1441​±51
• Sheldon, Elizabeth
• 5 −11 −11 5 6
• +12
• 1391​±52
• Cooney, Steve
• 4 8 −12 8
• +6
• 1342​±65
• Thompson, Curtis G
• 7 −11 7 5
• +2
• 1251​±69
• Downes, Jett
• 4 7 7
• 0
• 1036​±48
• Sample, Paul
• 4 4 3
•  
• Van Duesen, John
• Rating Change
  1693​±112 + 15 = 1708​±77
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +46
• 1676​±92
• Patel, Samir
• −11 5 4 2
• −42
• 1741​±114
• Su, Qiancheng
• −12 3 12 8
• +16
• 1567​±69
• Bunyi, Harold
• 7 −12 8 −11 9
• −10
• 1896​±105
• Chen, Tianwei
• 6 6 2
• +3
• 1424​±83
• Purdy, Sean
• 10 −11 −11 9 7 8
• +1
• 1315​±102
• Vincent, Ronald
• 8 8 −12 2
•  
• Vincent, Ronald
• Rating Change
  1355​±117 − 29 = 1326​±100
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −20
• 1549​±67
• Bunyi, Harold
• 9 −11 6 11
• −6
• 1638​±81
• Patel, Samir
• 3 −11 16 7
• −2
• 1701​±81
• Van Duesen, John
• 8 8 −12 2
• −1
• 1781​±107
• Su, Qiancheng
• 6 −18 8 3
•  
• Wang, Harvey
• Rating Change
  1466​±130 − 121 = 1345​±94
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −93
• 1380​±81
• Purdy, Sean
• 3 8 5
• −28
• 1475​±93
• Lange, Orion
• 3 −11 8 6
• 0
• 1907​±104
• Chen, Tianwei
• 1 3 6
•  
• Williams, Chad
• Rating Change
  959​±105 + 56 = 1015​±81
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +78
• 1239​±139
• Bacuyani, Daniel
• 7 6 7
• −14
• 1170​±122
• Halter, Neil
• 6 8 6
• −7
• 1239​±139
• Porter, Preston
• 5 9 7
• −2
• 1313​±98
• Root, Phill
• 6 −11 8 6

• Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
• Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment

Players: 43. Matches: 100. Club: Lane County Table Tennis Club. State: Oregon (OR). Country: United States (USA). Director: Benedick, Larry. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 21157. Submitted/revised: 2021-06-28 5:10 pm EDT. Last processed: 2024-04-18 11:29 pm EDT.