NCTTA Kansas Division Fall 2011 Tournament
2011-11-22
Detailed Report
- Agnew, Chris
- Rating Change
1007±160 + 39 = 1046±129 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +48
- 872±147
- Tian, Maosha
- −8 9 17 7
- −14
- 1352±90
- Gu, Peidi
- 9 10 9
- +5
- 589±175
- Millspaugh, Jeff
- 4 8 5
- Bayer, Cal
- Rating Change
1000±200 + 0 = 1000±144 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +81
- 896±171
- McCann, Joseph
- 8 −11 2 6
- −81
- 1104±170
- Steinberg, Jay
- 9 7 −9 6
- 0
- 1859±105
- Phachantry, P.J.
- 2 1 4
- Beckstrom, Kyle
- Rating Change
1417±108 + 51 = 1468±98 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +50
- 1398±55
- Jiang, Hao
- −10 6 4 −8 8
- 0
- 928±122
- Scott, Ian
- 5 11 −8 7
- Bonham, Ethan
- Rating Change
1000±200 − 147 = 853±113 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +91
- 811±126
- Mei, Di
- 9 11 −5 6
- −266
- 724±66
- Li, Xiaoyu
- 5 −7 11 6
- +28
- 683±129
- Pham, Brian
- 1 3 3
- Gu, Peidi
- Rating Change
1351±90 + 6 = 1357±88 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1060±141
- Agnew, Chris
- 9 10 9
- 0
- 831±135
- Tian, Maosha
- 3 8 9
- 0
- 576±169
- Millspaugh, Jeff
- 4 0 7
- Holman, John
- Rating Change
850±200 − 52 = 798±111 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +127
- 885±132
- Yang, Liu
- 4 4 2
- −137
- 794±142
- Le, Dan
- −9 4 10 5
- −43
- 879±131
- Scott, Ian
- 6 −9 7 −3 11
- Jiang, Hao
- Rating Change
1398±55 − 13 = 1385±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 928±122
- Scott, Ian
- 9 5 6
- −13
- 1418±108
- Beckstrom, Kyle
- −10 6 4 −8 8
- Le, Dan
- Rating Change
836±155 − 19 = 817±110 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +88
- 843±134
- Holman, John
- −9 4 10 5
- −107
- 740±142
- Yang, Liu
- 0 0 0 0
- −1
- 1376±142
- Tan, Shih Yik
- 5 −5 4 7
- 0
- 1402±88
- Myers, Nate
- 4 5 12
- 0
- 1450±64
- Zhao, Huan
- 6 5 2
- Li, Xiaoyu
- Rating Change
676±54 + 133 = 809±101 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +42
- 1163±156
- Bonham, Ethan
- 5 −7 11 6
- +51
- 1000±145
- Mei, Di
- 5 −9 6 −7 11
- +40
- 837±156
- Pham, Brian
- 6 −8 7 2
- Malhi, Haider
- Rating Change
1186±161 + 168 = 1354±132 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +157
- 1358±112
- Zhang, Junyou
- 5 5 10
- +10
- 973±183
- Pierce, Matt
- 3 6 7
- McCann, Joseph
- Rating Change
1000±200 − 175 = 825±151 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −144
- 896±171
- Bayer, Cal
- 8 −11 2 6
- −30
- 1104±170
- Steinberg, Jay
- 9 11 4
- 0
- 1859±105
- Phachantry, P.J.
- 0 2 4
- Mei, Di
- Rating Change
1000±200 − 262 = 738±106 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +57
- 683±129
- Pham, Brian
- 5 8 6
- −266
- 724±66
- Li, Xiaoyu
- 5 −9 6 −7 11
- −52
- 811±126
- Bonham, Ethan
- 9 11 −5 6
- Millspaugh, Jeff
- Rating Change
650±200 − 81 = 569±166 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −73
- 787±150
- Tian, Maosha
- 9 10 −10 −5 7
- −8
- 1033±134
- Agnew, Chris
- 4 8 5
- 0
- 1356±89
- Gu, Peidi
- 4 0 7
- Myers, Nate
- Rating Change
1468±111 − 66 = 1402±88 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 863±125
- Le, Dan
- 4 5 12
- −66
- 1427±65
- Zhao, Huan
- −8 12 7 4
- Phachantry, P.J.
- Rating Change
1859±105 + 0 = 1859±104 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1163±156
- Steinberg, Jay
- 2 4 7
- 0
- 1000±145
- Bayer, Cal
- 2 1 4
- 0
- 837±156
- McCann, Joseph
- 0 2 4
- Pham, Brian
- Rating Change
1000±200 − 375 = 625±114 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −251
- 683±129
- Mei, Di
- 5 8 6
- −97
- 724±66
- Li, Xiaoyu
- 6 −8 7 2
- −26
- 811±126
- Bonham, Ethan
- 1 3 3
- Pierce, Matt
- Rating Change
1000±200 − 55 = 945±170 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −39
- 1280±100
- Zhang, Junyou
- 9 2 6
- −16
- 1339±137
- Malhi, Haider
- 3 6 7
- Scott, Ian
- Rating Change
762±157 + 179 = 941±112 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +128
- 934±141
- Yang, Liu
- 8 4 3
- −1
- 1385±52
- Jiang, Hao
- 9 5 6
- +52
- 865±135
- Holman, John
- 6 −9 7 −3 11
- 0
- 1468±98
- Beckstrom, Kyle
- 5 11 −8 7
- Steinberg, Jay
- Rating Change
1000±200 + 174 = 1174±151 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +144
- 1104±170
- Bayer, Cal
- 9 7 −9 6
- 0
- 1859±105
- Phachantry, P.J.
- 2 4 7
- +30
- 896±171
- McCann, Joseph
- 9 11 4
- Tan, Shih Yik
- Rating Change
1377±143 + 2 = 1379±140 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 865±126
- Le, Dan
- 5 −5 4 7
- −1
- 1964±92
- Zhang, Luwen
- 4 6 7
- Tian, Maosha
- Rating Change
833±166 − 6 = 827±133 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 621±184
- Millspaugh, Jeff
- 9 10 −10 −5 7
- −44
- 1010±142
- Agnew, Chris
- −8 9 17 7
- −1
- 1355±89
- Gu, Peidi
- 3 8 9
- Yang, Liu
- Rating Change
1000±200 − 194 = 806±109 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +111
- 901±133
- Le, Dan
- 0 0 0 0
- −254
- 656±145
- Holman, John
- 4 4 2
- −52
- 847±134
- Scott, Ian
- 8 4 3
- Zhang, Junyou
- Rating Change
1349±114 − 60 = 1289±97 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 938±175
- Pierce, Matt
- 9 2 6
- −66
- 1224±152
- Malhi, Haider
- 5 5 10
- Zhang, Luwen
- Rating Change
1964±92 + 0 = 1964±92 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1380±141
- Tan, Shih Yik
- 4 6 7
- Zhao, Huan
- Rating Change
1427±65 + 23 = 1450±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1468±111
- Myers, Nate
- −8 12 7 4
- 0
- 863±125
- Le, Dan
- 6 5 2
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 25. Matches: 34. Club: NCTTA Kansas Division. State: Nebraska (NE). Country: United States (USA). Director: Teotia, Seemant. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 9395. Submitted/revised: 2012-11-11 11:04 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-03-20 7:57 am EDT.