Official Ratings/Rankings of ÖTTV, NÖTTV, STTV, KTTV, BTTV, TTTV, StTTV, WTTV, VTTV, OÖTTV, TTQ, TTSA, TTTA, TTV, and ELTTL.
Ratings Central: The World’s Most Accurate Rating System
HomePlayersEventsClubsProfessional PlayersInfo

2004 USA Olympic Singles Trials
2004-01-13
Detailed Report

Hazinski, MarkRating Change
2496±91 + 41 = 2537±51
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+452559±65Xiao, Han−15 5 6 3 4−482457±66Reed, Barney7 6 −7 −9 9 10
+282526±71Hugh, Adam7 −8 9 6 9−132578±63Nguyen, Khoa7 9 9 −8 −9 9
+182487±63Owens, Eric−8 8 6 −3 11 6−62640±71Zhuang, David2 8 8 6
+72401±63Leibovitz, Tahl2 −10 3 5 102915±141Lupulesku, Ilija10 −10 −9 7 6 8
+62395±74Rop, Darko7 7 9 8
+32324±83Pace, Brian4 7 −9 3 7
+12216±109Jain, Ashu6 8 8 −8 −8 3
 
Hugh, AdamRating Change
2152±260 + 347 = 2499±58
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+3052559±63Xiao, Han8 8 9 5−552464±61Owens, Eric8 −9 −6 13 −4 9 6
+712507±61Reed, Barney8 −5 −8 9 5 −6 10−142528±59Hazinski, Mark7 −8 9 6 9
+232409±62Leibovitz, Tahl7 10 7 9−52589±61Nguyen, Khoa13 −4 12 −12 5 6
+152407±71Rop, Darko−8 4 12 9 −8 7−22648±69Zhuang, David−9 8 4 10 3
+72341±79Pace, Brian11 2 8 702917±140Lupulesku, Ilija6 9 5 2
+32245±105Jain, Ashu−7 7 9 8 −8 −10 3
 
Jain, AshuRating Change
2500±200 − 228 = 2272±78
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+762324±81Pace, Brian9 6 −11 8 8−1992351±79Rop, Darko7 −9 7 −8 6 7
−602369±64Leibovitz, Tahl5 8 −9 3 −6 −9 11
−172453±63Owens, Eric9 3 6 4
−112468±62Reed, Barney10 6 8 7
−82481±69Hugh, Adam−7 7 9 8 −8 −10 3
−42519±59Hazinski, Mark6 8 8 −8 −8 3
−42520±61Xiao, Han10 7 9 5
−22581±62Nguyen, Khoa2 9 12 10
−12640±70Zhuang, David6 6 4 7
02910±141Lupulesku, Ilija3 3 2 4
 
Leibovitz, TahlRating Change
2450±100 − 60 = 2390±55
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+522491±63Owens, Eric−11 9 −11 −9 5 8 3−912223±108Pace, Brian−9 −7 9 −10 6 8 6
+252400±74Rop, Darko10 −7 −7 9 5 −12 12−212464±65Reed, Barney−9 5 −9 10 −7 4 9
+62221±110Jain, Ashu5 8 −9 3 −6 −9 11−142476±72Hugh, Adam7 10 7 9
−72518±61Hazinski, Mark2 −10 3 5 1
−62518±62Xiao, Han12 5 2 9
−32582±63Nguyen, Khoa7 6 8 −9 6
−12643±70Zhuang, David6 7 8 −10 8
02916±141Lupulesku, Ilija7 6 6 4
 
Lupulesku, IlijaRating Change
2789±190 + 116 = 2905±140
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+742661±72Zhuang, David8 6 7 7
+202597±62Nguyen, Khoa9 4 −7 9 8
+72536±61Xiao, Han10 3 5 4
+62534±59Hazinski, Mark10 −10 −9 7 6 8
+42501±68Hugh, Adam6 9 5 2
+32486±61Reed, Barney12 3 8 8
+22470±61Owens, Eric3 5 10 8
+12391±61Leibovitz, Tahl7 6 6 4
+12382±72Rop, Darko9 9 2 4
02315±81Pace, Brian6 4 6 −7 6
02210±107Jain, Ashu3 3 2 4
 
Nguyen, KhoaRating Change
2550±100 + 38 = 2588±56
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+472549±63Hazinski, Mark7 9 9 −8 −9 9−592508±63Xiao, Han8 7 −9 −9 9 6
+262517±71Hugh, Adam13 −4 12 −12 5 6−152635±71Zhuang, David6 −9 −11 7 4 13
+172497±63Reed, Barney8 8 11 −17 −7 7−12911±142Lupulesku, Ilija9 4 −7 9 8
+122481±63Owens, Eric−6 14 12 −5 6 −8 7
+52396±63Leibovitz, Tahl7 6 8 −9 6
+42390±74Rop, Darko11 −7 −7 −6 9 6 7
+22320±82Pace, Brian7 4 9 7
+12213±108Jain, Ashu2 9 12 10
 
Owens, EricRating Change
2516±129 − 45 = 2471±54
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+892695±80Zhuang, David5 9 14 7−1522226±106Pace, Brian−4 4 8 −11 13 −9 5
+482519±70Hugh, Adam8 −9 −6 13 −4 9 6−562357±66Leibovitz, Tahl−11 9 −11 −9 5 8 3
+322498±62Reed, Barney6 5 7 −4 9−102514±60Hazinski, Mark−8 8 6 −3 11 6
+132392±73Rop, Darko−3 8 −13 6 9 9−82515±62Xiao, Han12 9 4 9
+22216±109Jain, Ashu9 3 6 4−32578±63Nguyen, Khoa−6 14 12 −5 6 −8 7
02912±142Lupulesku, Ilija3 5 10 8
 
Pace, BrianRating Change
2096±247 + 217 = 2313±72
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+2872499±62Owens, Eric−4 4 8 −11 13 −9 5−1302177±119Jain, Ashu9 6 −11 8 8
+822415±62Leibovitz, Tahl−9 −7 9 −10 6 8 6−142374±74Rop, Darko9 −7 −9 4 7 2
−32480±61Reed, Barney7 9 7 11
−22495±67Hugh, Adam11 2 8 7
−12528±59Hazinski, Mark4 7 −9 3 7
−12530±60Xiao, Han−10 −11 1 8 −10 9 6
02590±61Nguyen, Khoa7 4 9 7
02649±69Zhuang, David7 3 2 5
02918±140Lupulesku, Ilija6 4 6 −7 6
 
Reed, BarneyRating Change
2623±98 − 168 = 2455±54
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+522542±62Hazinski, Mark7 6 −7 −9 9 10−1192304±86Rop, Darko10 −5 9 −6 −7 8 9
+182393±62Leibovitz, Tahl−9 5 −9 10 −7 4 9−642428±65Owens, Eric6 5 7 −4 9
+82316±81Pace, Brian7 9 7 11−352451±72Hugh, Adam8 −5 −8 9 5 −6 10
+32210±108Jain, Ashu10 6 8 7−182500±62Xiao, Han−7 6 11 6 −4 4
−82565±63Nguyen, Khoa8 8 11 −17 −7 7
−42625±71Zhuang, David4 6 −7 5 9
02904±144Lupulesku, Ilija12 3 8 8
 
Rop, DarkoRating Change
2481±163 − 98 = 2383±61
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+962498±62Reed, Barney10 −5 9 −6 −7 8 9−1482366±65Leibovitz, Tahl10 −7 −7 9 5 −12 12
+242325±82Pace, Brian9 −7 −9 4 7 2−372451±63Owens, Eric−3 8 −13 6 9 9
+82219±108Jain, Ashu7 −9 7 −8 6 7−192479±70Hugh, Adam−8 4 12 9 −8 7
−92518±60Hazinski, Mark7 7 9 8
−82519±61Xiao, Han7 −12 7 7 9
−32581±62Nguyen, Khoa11 −7 −7 −6 9 6 7
−12641±70Zhuang, David9 7 4 6
02913±141Lupulesku, Ilija9 9 2 4
 
Xiao, HanRating Change
2423±110 + 108 = 2531±54
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+852630±66Nguyen, Khoa8 7 −9 −9 9 6−412480±71Hugh, Adam8 8 9 5
+392509±62Reed, Barney−7 6 11 6 −4 4−192520±60Hazinski, Mark−15 5 6 3 4
+252493±63Owens, Eric12 9 4 9−42644±70Zhuang, David−9 9 6 3 7
+102406±63Leibovitz, Tahl12 5 2 902916±141Lupulesku, Ilija10 3 5 4
+82403±74Rop, Darko7 −12 7 7 9
+42332±83Pace, Brian−10 −11 1 8 −10 9 6
+12224±110Jain, Ashu10 7 9 5
 
Zhuang, DavidRating Change
2562±116 + 73 = 2635±63
WinsLosses
Point
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScorePoint
Change
Opponent’s
Rating
OpponentScore
+782615±65Nguyen, Khoa6 −9 −11 7 4 13−972437±65Owens, Eric5 9 14 7
+362549±64Xiao, Han−9 9 6 3 7−22910±142Lupulesku, Ilija8 6 7 7
+252546±62Hazinski, Mark2 8 8 6
+152515±70Hugh, Adam−9 8 4 10 3
+102495±62Reed, Barney4 6 −7 5 9
+32396±62Leibovitz, Tahl6 7 8 −10 8
+32389±73Rop, Darko9 7 4 6
+12319±82Pace, Brian7 3 2 5
02213±108Jain, Ashu6 6 4 7

Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating

Players: 12. Matches: 66. State: Pennsylvania (PA). Country: United States (USA). Director: O’Neill, Sean. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 1149. Submitted/revised: 2005-04-19 11:25 pm EDT. Last processed: 2020-05-12 5:44 pm EDT.