Brisbane Table Tennis Association Closed 2012
2012-11-19
Detailed Report
- Adaney, Edwin
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 65 = 935±127 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −54
- 1082±154
- Lo, Alex
- 11 −7 −9 8 7
- −10
- 1245±62
- Dvorani, Mateo
- 4 5 5
- Arias, Rodrigo
- Rating Change
1066±80 + 35 = 1101±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 1068±59
- Lander, Benjamin
- 7 −4 −8 4 6
- −10
- 1244±63
- Dvorani, Mateo
- 11 −4 5 −7 10
- +12
- 977±57
- Lander, Zabrynn
- 7 7 −8 9
- Battilana, Mike
- Rating Change
1252±45 + 11 = 1263±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1227±43
- Edwards, Mike
- −3 9 8 −5 9
- 0
- 1615±60
- So, Anakin
- 6 4 6
- +1
- 970±105
- Bygraves, Michael
- 9 6 −10 −8 6
- Bellamy, Ian
- Rating Change
1708±103 − 170 = 1538±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1010±63
- Pham, Kathy
- 8 3 7
- −88
- 1530±75
- Gould, Benjamin
- 8 9 4
- −59
- 1533±40
- Engstrom, David
- 5 −9 10 9
- −23
- 1605±68
- Weininger, Ivett
- 6 6 7
- Bygraves, Michael
- Rating Change
967±127 − 3 = 964±101 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 787±144
- Godstone, Steve
- 4 10 −8 6
- −20
- 1170±90
- Meys, Michael
- 7 8 −12 7
- −8
- 1216±42
- Edwards, Mike
- 3 6 7
- −4
- 1262±44
- Battilana, Mike
- 9 6 −10 −8 6
- Castillo, Claudio
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 22 = 1178±143 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 914±105
- James, Jim
- 2 5 13
- −61
- 1392±57
- Wiese, Brian
- 7 −9 5 6
- Chan, Stanley
- Rating Change
1702±48 − 3 = 1699±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1338±171
- Tran, Quang
- 5 5 9
- −4
- 1869±76
- Phan, Daniel
- 6 −6 8 −9 8
- Colebatch, Wen
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 34 = 966±105 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +58
- 945±148
- Donskoi, Eugene
- 10 7 6
- −92
- 992±66
- Pham, Kathy
- −8 8 −6 4 9
- Crocker, David
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 159 = 1041±144 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −158
- 1148±53
- Vickers, Bill
- 9 4 6
- −1
- 1614±60
- So, Anakin
- 2 6 7
- Donskoi, Eugene
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 327 = 873±123 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −253
- 886±124
- Colebatch, Wen
- 10 7 6
- −74
- 984±65
- Pham, Kathy
- 9 10 7
- Douglas, Ivan
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 156 = 1044±109 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +82
- 971±55
- Lander, Zabrynn
- 9 −11 7 7
- −237
- 984±65
- Pham, Kathy
- −6 7 6 9
- Duffy, Jake
- Rating Change
1908±52 − 16 = 1892±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1724±40
- Lane, Gavin
- 4 8 12
- −21
- 1836±70
- Phan, Daniel
- −6 6 8 −10 9
- +1
- 1589±86
- Gould, Benjamin
- 8 3 10
- +1
- 1583±60
- Yang, Zhen
- 7 −9 3 3
- Dvorani, Mateo
- Rating Change
1231±72 + 24 = 1255±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1258±175
- Lo, Alex
- 6 −8 4 5
- −22
- 1281±58
- Patane, Mark
- −11 5 9 7
- +9
- 1107±70
- Arias, Rodrigo
- 11 −4 5 −7 10
- +9
- 1101±113
- Poliakov, Andrei
- 5 5 5
- +4
- 1055±52
- Lander, Benjamin
- 9 −11 6 7
- +3
- 967±140
- Wu, Simon
- 5 5 5
- +3
- 967±140
- Adaney, Edwin
- 4 5 5
- +1
- 902±117
- Look, Roger
- 3 5 4
- Easling, Peter
- Rating Change
1637±142 − 3 = 1634±86 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 1760±204
- Howkins, Wayne
- 10 4 −9 6
- −55*
- 1546±44
- Engstrom, David
- 9 9 −9 9
- 0*
- 1546±44
- Engstrom, David
- 6 −3 6 12
- +5
- 1347±117
- Look, Frank
- 3 11 9
- +1
- 1212±57
- Yue, Brian
- 0 0 0
- +2
- 1126±210
- Lloyd, Danny
- 4 8 8
- 0
- 807±63
- Lander, Nicole
- 5 5 5
- Edwards, Mike
- Rating Change
1232±49 − 17 = 1215±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1171±54
- Vickers, Bill
- 6 7 4
- −13
- 1248±54
- Fleming, Warren
- 11 −6 4 6
- +1
- 972±105
- Bygraves, Michael
- 3 6 7
- −11
- 1252±44
- Battilana, Mike
- −3 9 8 −5 9
- −2
- 1392±58
- Wiese, Brian
- 8 9 10
- −2
- 1404±48
- Jenkins, Mike
- 1 −15 4 7
- Engstrom, David
- Rating Change
1519±43 + 29 = 1548±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11*
- 1706±132
- Easling, Peter
- 9 9 −9 9
- 0*
- 1706±132
- Easling, Peter
- 6 −3 6 12
- +13
- 1579±78
- Bellamy, Ian
- 5 −9 10 9
- −1
- 1797±68
- Lander, Peter
- 9 7 −8 −8 4
- +3
- 1406±60
- Wiese, Brian
- 6 9 8
- +2
- 1385±45
- Willis, Kathy
- 4 7 6
- +1
- 1274±44
- Engstrom, Judy
- 3 −8 6 4
- 0
- 1159±52
- Vickers, Bill
- 9 7 3
- 0
- 1095±154
- Randall, Mike
- 4 2 −10 −9 10
- 0
- 1010±63
- Pham, Kathy
- 10 2 3
- Engstrom, Judy
- Rating Change
1269±43 + 4 = 1273±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1170±180
- Randall, Mike
- 2 14 8
- −1
- 1549±43
- Engstrom, David
- 3 −8 6 4
- Fleming, Warren
- Rating Change
1254±67 + 9 = 1263±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1226±43
- Edwards, Mike
- 11 −6 4 6
- −22
- 1278±57
- Patane, Mark
- 4 −8 −11 7 7
- +10
- 1168±54
- Vickers, Bill
- 3 −6 10 8
- −5
- 1403±48
- Jenkins, Mike
- 5 7 3
- +5
- 1095±113
- Poliakov, Andrei
- −6 7 10 −6 5
- Garvey, Dale
- Rating Change
1400±200 − 144 = 1256±118 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +143
- 1359±160
- Marmin, Lyn
- −2 −8 3 6 6
- −350
- 972±65
- Pham, Kathy
- 8 −5 9 6
- +62
- 1202±129
- Meys, David
- 4 −9 4 6
- Garvey, Emlyn
- Rating Change
1200±200 + 52 = 1252±126 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +134
- 1209±91
- Meys, Michael
- 6 7 9
- −82
- 1304±158
- Werner, Alfred
- 11 11 9
- Godstone, Steve
- Rating Change
800±150 − 48 = 752±131 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −45
- 934±120
- Bygraves, Michael
- 4 10 −8 6
- −3
- 1178±87
- Meys, Michael
- 9 3 8
- Gould, Benjamin
- Rating Change
1481±64 + 94 = 1575±80 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +55
- 1697±75
- Weininger, Ivett
- −4 −7 5 10 5
- 0
- 1888±46
- Duffy, Jake
- 8 3 10
- +39
- 1581±76
- Bellamy, Ian
- 8 9 4
- Howkins, Wayne
- Rating Change
1616±246 − 30 = 1586±124 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +141
- 1656±173
- Leet, Martin
- 11 9 −12 5
- −179
- 1584±87
- Easling, Peter
- 10 4 −9 6
- +7
- 1244±59
- Martin, Ashley
- 8 8 9
- James, Jim
- Rating Change
915±105 − 13 = 902±102 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1146±171
- Castillo, Claudio
- 2 5 13
- 0
- 1397±57
- Wiese, Brian
- 5 5 7
- Jeffress, Anthony
- Rating Change
1816±62 − 13 = 1803±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1621±65
- So, Anakin
- 6 7 10
- −17
- 1854±74
- Phan, Daniel
- 3 5 −7 −7 8
- Jenkins, Mike
- Rating Change
1398±49 + 9 = 1407±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1270±54
- Fleming, Warren
- 5 7 3
- +3
- 1220±42
- Edwards, Mike
- 1 −15 4 7
- +1
- 1161±52
- Vickers, Bill
- 7 6 6
- Kwong, David
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 163 = 1037±117 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +52
- 909±117
- Look, Roger
- 7 −6 3 5
- −214
- 1039±47
- Lander, Benjamin
- 2 7 1
- Lander, Benjamin
- Rating Change
1019±56 + 44 = 1063±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1258±175
- Kwong, David
- 2 7 1
- −12
- 1076±70
- Arias, Rodrigo
- 7 −4 −8 4 6
- +15
- 1040±70
- Pham, Kathy
- 6 6 7
- −2
- 1246±62
- Dvorani, Mateo
- 9 −11 6 7
- +8
- 1000±150
- Meys, Tom
- 9 3 5
- +9
- 983±59
- Lander, Zabrynn
- −6 6 5 4
- +6
- 950±130
- Look, Roger
- 5 1 8
- Lander, Nicole
- Rating Change
829±68 − 26 = 803±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −21
- 842±90
- Lim, Lillian
- −9 6 10 10
- −5
- 1021±242
- Lloyd, Danny
- 3 4 −9 1
- 0
- 1607±87
- Easling, Peter
- 5 5 5
- Lander, Peter
- Rating Change
1794±68 + 3 = 1797±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1552±45
- Engstrom, David
- 9 7 −8 −8 4
- 0
- 1397±57
- Wiese, Brian
- 7 1 −8 8
- 0
- 1337±113
- Look, Frank
- 10 6 3
- Lander, Zabrynn
- Rating Change
996±70 − 21 = 975±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1041±69
- Pham, Kathy
- 8 9 −6 −9 8
- −23
- 945±148
- Douglas, Ivan
- 9 −11 7 7
- −14
- 1041±49
- Lander, Benjamin
- −6 6 5 4
- −8
- 1080±69
- Arias, Rodrigo
- 7 7 −8 9
- Lane, Gavin
- Rating Change
1720±41 + 1 = 1721±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1591±64
- Yang, Zhen
- −5 10 8 2
- −3
- 1885±47
- Duffy, Jake
- 4 8 12
- Leet, Martin
- Rating Change
1600±195 − 69 = 1531±127 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +50
- 1368±178
- Vidacak, Zeny
- 0 0 0
- −134
- 1514±156
- Howkins, Wayne
- 11 9 −12 5
- +15
- 1253±57
- Ng, Wee Meng Tony
- 10 7 −7 9
- Lim, Lillian
- Rating Change
881±98 + 10 = 891±79 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 823±66
- Lander, Nicole
- −9 6 10 10
- −23
- 999±66
- Pham, Kathy
- 4 4 12
- Lloyd, Danny
- Rating Change
1036±256 + 67 = 1103±193 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +83
- 812±63
- Lander, Nicole
- 3 4 −9 1
- −16
- 1606±87
- Easling, Peter
- 4 8 8
- Lo, Alex
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 63 = 1137±128 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +53
- 973±136
- Adaney, Edwin
- 11 −7 −9 8 7
- −117
- 1238±62
- Dvorani, Mateo
- 6 −8 4 5
- Look, Frank
- Rating Change
1400±200 − 79 = 1321±106 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +72
- 1217±58
- Yue, Brian
- 0 0 0
- −140
- 1385±58
- Wiese, Brian
- 9 6 −7 −7 7
- −10
- 1596±88
- Easling, Peter
- 3 11 9
- −1
- 1796±67
- Lander, Peter
- 10 6 3
- Look, Roger
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 122 = 878±112 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −82
- 978±139
- Kwong, David
- 7 −6 3 5
- −37
- 1043±48
- Lander, Benjamin
- 5 1 8
- −3
- 1245±62
- Dvorani, Mateo
- 3 5 4
- Louis, Henry
- Rating Change
1058±79 + 53 = 1111±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +53
- 1186±53
- Vickers, Bill
- −7 8 6 7
- −17
- 1157±94
- Meys, Michael
- −10 11 14 9
- +17
- 1067±150
- Widrose, Charlie
- −3 9 6 −3 4
- Marmin, Lyn
- Rating Change
1200±200 + 11 = 1211±126 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +130
- 1236±133
- Meys, David
- 7 10 3
- −119
- 1202±131
- Garvey, Dale
- −2 −8 3 6 6
- Martin, Ashley
- Rating Change
1244±59 − 2 = 1242±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 1594±149
- Howkins, Wayne
- 8 8 9
- Meys, David
- Rating Change
1343±169 − 244 = 1099±109 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −132
- 1143±179
- Marmin, Lyn
- 7 10 3
- −79
- 1148±135
- Garvey, Dale
- 4 −9 4 6
- −33
- 1218±161
- Somerset, Shaun
- 8 9 −8 7
- Meys, Michael
- Rating Change
1179±177 + 38 = 1217±81 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +144
- 1493±168
- Somerset, Shaun
- −6 5 4 8
- −110
- 1108±174
- Garvey, Emlyn
- 6 7 9
- +40
- 1144±81
- Louis, Henry
- −10 11 14 9
- −27
- 1286±57
- Patane, Mark
- 6 6 9
- +8
- 980±104
- Bygraves, Michael
- 7 8 −12 7
- −18
- 1305±160
- Werner, Alfred
- 10 −11 4 5
- +1
- 762±135
- Godstone, Steve
- 9 3 8
- Meys, Tom
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 76 = 924±121 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −76
- 1043±48
- Lander, Benjamin
- 9 3 5
- Nethercott, Scott
- Rating Change
1021±82 + 58 = 1079±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +50
- 1304±171
- Shaw, Alan
- 5 9 15
- −18
- 1096±171
- Thomson, John
- 7 −6 7 9
- +26
- 1036±69
- Pham, Kathy
- 6 −8 4 7
- Ng, Wee Meng Tony
- Rating Change
1253±57 − 2 = 1251±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 1562±151
- Leet, Martin
- 10 7 −7 9
- Patane, Mark
- Rating Change
1235±61 + 67 = 1302±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1286±56
- Fleming, Warren
- 4 −8 −11 7 7
- −7
- 1391±58
- Wiese, Brian
- −8 −4 10 7 8
- +20
- 1283±71
- Dvorani, Mateo
- −11 5 9 7
- +11
- 1279±173
- Schmalkuche, Nigel
- 7 5 7
- +11
- 1231±102
- Meys, Michael
- 6 6 9
- +4
- 1100±114
- Poliakov, Andrei
- 4 −9 4 6
- +3
- 1027±162
- Yu, Heidi
- 6 4 8
- Pham, Kathy
- Rating Change
879±127 + 163 = 1042±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +117
- 1520±160
- Garvey, Dale
- 8 −5 9 6
- −47
- 958±54
- Lander, Zabrynn
- 8 9 −6 −9 8
- +57
- 1257±169
- Douglas, Ivan
- −6 7 6 9
- −14
- 1044±76
- Nethercott, Scott
- 6 −8 4 7
- +33
- 1106±132
- Colebatch, Wen
- −8 8 −6 4 9
- −10
- 1047±49
- Lander, Benjamin
- 6 6 7
- +17
- 1012±156
- Donskoi, Eugene
- 9 10 7
- 0
- 1533±70
- Bellamy, Ian
- 8 3 7
- +10
- 916±88
- Lim, Lillian
- 4 4 12
- 0
- 1550±43
- Engstrom, David
- 10 2 3
- Phan, Daniel
- Rating Change
1794±72 + 83 = 1877±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +51
- 1911±51
- Duffy, Jake
- −6 6 8 −10 9
- +25
- 1819±61
- Jeffress, Anthony
- 3 5 −7 −7 8
- +7
- 1703±48
- Chan, Stanley
- 6 −6 8 −9 8
- 0
- 1331±168
- Tran, Quang
- 4 4 6
- Poliakov, Andrei
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 119 = 1081±107 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +51
- 973±136
- Wu, Simon
- −5 5 5 5
- −117
- 1238±62
- Dvorani, Mateo
- 5 5 5
- −37
- 1256±52
- Fleming, Warren
- −6 7 10 −6 5
- −17
- 1286±57
- Patane, Mark
- 4 −9 4 6
- Randall, Mike
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 108 = 1092±152 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −106
- 1268±42
- Engstrom, Judy
- 2 14 8
- −2
- 1549±43
- Engstrom, David
- 4 2 −10 −9 10
- Schmalkuche, Nigel
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 36 = 1164±129 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +62
- 1026±150
- Yu, Heidi
- 9 −4 6 9
- −98
- 1286±57
- Patane, Mark
- 7 5 7
- Shaw, Alan
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 84 = 1116±118 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +129
- 1265±168
- Thomson, John
- 12 2 4
- −213
- 1024±76
- Nethercott, Scott
- 5 9 15
- So, Anakin
- Rating Change
1612±66 + 2 = 1614±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1400±58
- Wiese, Brian
- −9 7 5 9
- −7
- 1793±56
- Jeffress, Anthony
- 6 7 10
- +4
- 1399±173
- Werner, Alfred
- 7 10 9
- 0
- 1263±44
- Battilana, Mike
- 6 4 6
- 0
- 1159±52
- Vickers, Bill
- 10 6 6
- 0
- 1067±150
- Crocker, David
- 2 6 7
- Somerset, Shaun
- Rating Change
1400±200 − 169 = 1231±120 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +85
- 1202±129
- Meys, David
- 8 9 −8 7
- −253
- 1130±90
- Meys, Michael
- −6 5 4 8
- Thomson, John
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 86 = 1114±118 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +112
- 1067±78
- Nethercott, Scott
- 7 −6 7 9
- −198
- 988±143
- Shaw, Alan
- 12 2 4
- Tran, Quang
- Rating Change
1343±175 − 14 = 1329±167 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1695±45
- Chan, Stanley
- 5 5 9
- −1
- 1875±75
- Phan, Daniel
- 4 4 6
- Vickers, Bill
- Rating Change
1198±67 − 46 = 1152±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1184±188
- Crocker, David
- 9 4 6
- −38
- 1073±74
- Louis, Henry
- −7 8 6 7
- +6
- 1005±144
- Widrose, Charlie
- 3 8 4
- −16
- 1207±43
- Edwards, Mike
- 6 7 4
- −8
- 1252±54
- Fleming, Warren
- 3 −6 10 8
- −1
- 1405±48
- Jenkins, Mike
- 7 6 6
- 0
- 1550±43
- Engstrom, David
- 9 7 3
- 0
- 1615±60
- So, Anakin
- 10 6 6
- Vidacak, Zeny
- Rating Change
1368±178 − 53 = 1315±155 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −53
- 1540±151
- Leet, Martin
- 0 0 0
- Weininger, Ivett
- Rating Change
1663±77 − 32 = 1631±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1547±74
- Bellamy, Ian
- 6 6 7
- −49
- 1530±76
- Gould, Benjamin
- −4 −7 5 10 5
- Werner, Alfred
- Rating Change
1241±212 + 148 = 1389±129 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +129
- 1303±168
- Garvey, Emlyn
- 11 11 9
- −28
- 1613±60
- So, Anakin
- 7 10 9
- +46
- 1204±90
- Meys, Michael
- 10 −11 4 5
- Widrose, Charlie
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 222 = 978±128 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −177
- 1100±72
- Louis, Henry
- −3 9 6 −3 4
- −45
- 1148±53
- Vickers, Bill
- 3 8 4
- Wiese, Brian
- Rating Change
1419±80 − 12 = 1407±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1408±136
- Look, Frank
- 9 6 −7 −7 7
- −44
- 1368±41
- Willis, Kathy
- 9 −10 6 8
- +12
- 1307±69
- Patane, Mark
- −8 −4 10 7 8
- −7
- 1546±43
- Engstrom, David
- 6 9 8
- +6
- 1239±178
- Castillo, Claudio
- 7 −9 5 6
- −3
- 1611±61
- So, Anakin
- −9 7 5 9
- +4
- 1219±42
- Edwards, Mike
- 8 9 10
- 0
- 1798±67
- Lander, Peter
- 7 1 −8 8
- 0
- 904±103
- James, Jim
- 5 5 7
- Willis, Kathy
- Rating Change
1372±43 + 11 = 1383±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1427±62
- Wiese, Brian
- 9 −10 6 8
- −3
- 1548±43
- Engstrom, David
- 4 7 6
- Wu, Simon
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 80 = 920±124 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −72
- 1018±131
- Poliakov, Andrei
- −5 5 5 5
- −8
- 1245±62
- Dvorani, Mateo
- 5 5 5
- Yang, Zhen
- Rating Change
1593±66 − 12 = 1581±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1718±39
- Lane, Gavin
- −5 10 8 2
- −1
- 1888±46
- Duffy, Jake
- 7 −9 3 3
- Yu, Heidi
- Rating Change
1100±191 − 125 = 975±140 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −110
- 1082±152
- Schmalkuche, Nigel
- 9 −4 6 9
- −15
- 1289±58
- Patane, Mark
- 6 4 8
- Yue, Brian
- Rating Change
1217±59 − 11 = 1206±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1264±148
- Look, Frank
- 0 0 0
- 0
- 1606±87
- Easling, Peter
- 0 0 0
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 68. Matches: 113. Club: Brisbane Table Tennis Association. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Lander, Peter. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 11850. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-01 3:46 pm EST. Last processed: 2021-01-17 4:48 pm EST.