2013 Oregon State Championship
2013-09-07
Detailed Report
- Aikey, Tim
- Rating Change
1928±69 + 14 = 1942±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1841±69
- Chia, Brian
- 6 −13 8 12
- −12
- 2044±191
- Novalo, Esther
- −7 9 9 −8 9
- +11
- 1836±74
- Lam, Hau
- −7 7 10 8
- +1
- 1628±44
- Antoniadis, Nikos
- 4 10 3
- 0
- 1577±58
- Nguyen, Nha
- 6 6 6
- 0
- 1472±69
- Su, Mengjin
- 6 6 6
- Antoniadis, Nikos
- Rating Change
1614±44 + 13 = 1627±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1597±64
- Nguyen, Nha
- −6 −6 8 9 6
- −1
- 1939±62
- Aikey, Tim
- 4 10 3
- +4
- 1484±73
- Su, Mengjin
- −9 9 8 −12 2
- Beck, Jenny
- Rating Change
1211±33 + 0 = 1211±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1499±56
- Pandana, Herman
- 4 7 10
- 0
- 1640±51
- Groom, Michael
- 4 6 6
- 0
- 2119±176
- Novalo, Esther
- 2 2 3
- Bednarz, Ben
- Rating Change
1474±66 − 10 = 1464±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1031±52
- Burns, Paige
- 2 7 5
- −9
- 1616±60
- Peng, Johnyeng
- 6 9 −8 −7 6
- −1
- 1819±67
- Lam, Hau
- 2 2 6
- Burns, Paige
- Rating Change
1031±52 + 0 = 1031±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1465±62
- Bednarz, Ben
- 2 7 5
- 0
- 1623±58
- Peng, Johnyeng
- 5 1 8
- 0
- 1820±67
- Lam, Hau
- 1 1 3
- Castle, Roger
- Rating Change
1818±54 − 11 = 1807±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1689±65
- Eiles, Travis
- −10 −8 8 8 8
- −18
- 1800±63
- Chia, Brian
- 5 −8 −4 9 10
- 0
- 1478±54
- Teodorescu, George
- 10 3 9
- 0
- 1461±73
- Le, Andy
- 7 5 7
- Chang, William
- Rating Change
1692±93 + 61 = 1753±84 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +58
- 1759±59
- Shim, Kern
- 8 7 4
- −3
- 2112±178
- Novalo, Esther
- 1 2 10
- +5
- 1500±78
- Liu, Raymond
- 8 9 −10 5
- 0
- 1268±52
- Mayevskiy, Yevgeniy
- 5 6 3
- Chen, Eric
- Rating Change
1423±34 − 4 = 1419±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 1519±87
- Jin, Jefferey
- 9 8 8
- 0
- 1783±34
- Schock, Phil
- 4 1 3
- 0
- 1814±68
- Ho, Hung
- 4 5 3
- Chen, Jia Feng (Jason)
- Rating Change
1738±64 + 21 = 1759±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 1789±45
- Garcia, Ludovic
- 7 8 7
- −15
- 1801±71
- Lam, Hau
- 8 8 8
- +6
- 1594±129
- Crystal, Jay
- 9 6 9
- +1
- 1498±41
- Doan, Antoine
- 8 7 6
- Chia, Brian
- Rating Change
1795±73 + 33 = 1828±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1825±53
- Castle, Roger
- 5 −8 −4 9 10
- −12
- 1932±63
- Aikey, Tim
- 6 −13 8 12
- +12
- 1733±92
- Kung, Thomas
- 5 9 −10 −8 6
- +1
- 1553±34
- Goldsmith, Phil
- 5 3 8
- 0
- 1415±53
- Da, Leezan
- 8 4 7
- Crystal, Jay
- Rating Change
1450±250 + 112 = 1562±115 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +187
- 1502±42
- Doan, Antoine
- 10 7 6
- −56
- 1760±58
- Chen, Jia Feng (Jason)
- 9 6 9
- −19
- 1772±42
- Garcia, Ludovic
- 9 7 7
- Da, Leezan
- Rating Change
1425±59 − 10 = 1415±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1550±34
- Goldsmith, Phil
- 3 6 4
- −1
- 1700±79
- Kung, Thomas
- 7 3 3
- 0
- 1825±61
- Chia, Brian
- 8 4 7
- Doan, Antoine
- Rating Change
1504±43 − 10 = 1494±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1373±203
- Crystal, Jay
- 10 7 6
- −1
- 1761±58
- Chen, Jia Feng (Jason)
- 8 7 6
- −1
- 1773±42
- Garcia, Ludovic
- 8 7 7
- Eiles, Travis
- Rating Change
1678±68 − 2 = 1676±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1481±56
- Teodorescu, George
- 6 5 9
- −11
- 1802±49
- Castle, Roger
- −10 −8 8 8 8
- +4
- 1466±75
- Le, Andy
- 7 9 6
- Garcia, Ludovic
- Rating Change
1787±45 − 13 = 1774±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1580±126
- Crystal, Jay
- 9 7 7
- −16
- 1735±59
- Chen, Jia Feng (Jason)
- 7 8 7
- +1
- 1497±41
- Doan, Antoine
- 8 7 7
- Goldsmith, Phil
- Rating Change
1553±35 − 1 = 1552±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1422±57
- Da, Leezan
- 3 6 4
- −3
- 1689±82
- Kung, Thomas
- −9 5 4 9
- 0
- 1824±61
- Chia, Brian
- 5 3 8
- Groom, Michael
- Rating Change
1637±53 + 6 = 1643±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1508±58
- Pandana, Herman
- −6 5 2 7
- 0
- 2116±177
- Novalo, Esther
- 2 1 4
- 0
- 1211±33
- Beck, Jenny
- 4 6 6
- Hermann, James
- Rating Change
1514±63 − 2 = 1512±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1501±126
- Scott, James (Jim) H.
- 10 1 4
- −16
- 1570±41
- Mandelbaum, Sean
- −6 −8 6 9 6
- 0
- 1863±72
- Liu, Ethan
- 7 9 3
- Ho, Hung
- Rating Change
1830±90 − 2 = 1828±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1789±36
- Schock, Phil
- 12 −12 4 6
- −37
- 1841±71
- Liu, Ethan
- −4 7 7 9
- +2
- 1545±79
- Jin, Jefferey
- 6 −6 8 4
- 0
- 1419±33
- Chen, Eric
- 4 5 3
- Jin, Jefferey
- Rating Change
1528±91 + 13 = 1541±77 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1422±33
- Chen, Eric
- 9 8 8
- −6
- 1783±34
- Schock, Phil
- 1 6 4
- −4
- 1812±68
- Ho, Hung
- 6 −6 8 4
- Kung, Thomas
- Rating Change
1715±98 − 9 = 1706±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1555±34
- Goldsmith, Phil
- −9 5 4 9
- −27
- 1815±62
- Chia, Brian
- 5 9 −10 −8 6
- +3
- 1416±54
- Da, Leezan
- 7 3 3
- Lam, Hau
- Rating Change
1881±101 − 45 = 1836±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 1774±63
- Chen, Jia Feng (Jason)
- 8 8 8
- −57
- 1835±69
- Liu, Ethan
- 11 −3 10 −8 8
- +5
- 1626±60
- Peng, Johnyeng
- 3 9 5
- −19
- 1925±62
- Aikey, Tim
- −7 7 10 8
- +1
- 1465±63
- Bednarz, Ben
- 2 2 6
- 0
- 1031±51
- Burns, Paige
- 1 1 3
- Le, Andy
- Rating Change
1522±93 − 63 = 1459±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −56
- 1456±56
- Teodorescu, George
- −8 10 −8 8 10
- −6
- 1672±62
- Eiles, Travis
- 7 9 6
- −1
- 1806±48
- Castle, Roger
- 7 5 7
- Le, Ly Anh
- Rating Change
1608±100 + 40 = 1648±83 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +50
- 1626±52
- Xu, Zhongkai (John)
- 14 10 −3 −5 5
- −10
- 1846±68
- Wang, Maoxi George
- 9 2 1
- Liu, Ethan
- Rating Change
1754±73 + 114 = 1868±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +49
- 1904±80
- Wang, Maoxi George
- 4 −6 −10 9 8
- −3
- 2107±180
- Novalo, Esther
- 8 −10 7 8
- +36
- 1867±77
- Lam, Hau
- 11 −3 10 −8 8
- +30
- 1865±84
- Ho, Hung
- −4 7 7 9
- +2
- 1579±43
- Mandelbaum, Sean
- 7 4 5
- +1
- 1518±56
- Hermann, James
- 7 9 3
- +1
- 1442±116
- Scott, James (Jim) H.
- 3 2 3
- Liu, Raymond
- Rating Change
1500±83 − 7 = 1493±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1270±53
- Mayevskiy, Yevgeniy
- 5 5 8
- −6
- 1734±54
- Shim, Kern
- 8 2 5
- −6
- 1737±83
- Chang, William
- 8 9 −10 5
- Mandelbaum, Sean
- Rating Change
1562±42 + 13 = 1575±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1534±61
- Hermann, James
- −6 −8 6 9 6
- −1
- 1863±72
- Liu, Ethan
- 7 4 5
- +5
- 1484±127
- Scott, James (Jim) H.
- 8 8 6
- Mayevskiy, Yevgeniy
- Rating Change
1271±54 − 4 = 1267±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 1486±76
- Liu, Raymond
- 5 5 8
- 0
- 1736±53
- Shim, Kern
- 0 5 4
- 0
- 1742±82
- Chang, William
- 5 6 3
- Nguyen, Nha
- Rating Change
1584±67 − 9 = 1575±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1488±73
- Su, Mengjin
- 4 4 −8 10
- −21
- 1619±43
- Antoniadis, Nikos
- −6 −6 8 9 6
- 0
- 1939±62
- Aikey, Tim
- 6 6 6
- Novalo, Esther
- Rating Change
1869±270 + 284 = 2153±169 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +237
- 1954±67
- Aikey, Tim
- −7 9 9 −8 9
- +37
- 1880±78
- Liu, Ethan
- 8 −10 7 8
- +8
- 1757±88
- Chang, William
- 1 2 10
- +1
- 1643±52
- Groom, Michael
- 2 1 4
- 0
- 1502±56
- Pandana, Herman
- 8 2 2
- 0
- 1211±33
- Beck, Jenny
- 2 2 3
- Pandana, Herman
- Rating Change
1509±59 − 7 = 1502±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1211±33
- Beck, Jenny
- 4 7 10
- −8
- 1634±52
- Groom, Michael
- −6 5 2 7
- 0
- 2118±176
- Novalo, Esther
- 8 2 2
- Peng, Johnyeng
- Rating Change
1619±62 + 2 = 1621±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1473±65
- Bednarz, Ben
- 6 9 −8 −7 6
- −5
- 1814±69
- Lam, Hau
- 3 9 5
- 0
- 1031±52
- Burns, Paige
- 5 1 8
- Schock, Phil
- Rating Change
1788±36 − 7 = 1781±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1546±80
- Jin, Jefferey
- 1 6 4
- −8
- 1783±73
- Ho, Hung
- 12 −12 4 6
- 0
- 1419±33
- Chen, Eric
- 4 1 3
- Scott, James (Jim) H.
- Rating Change
1776±218 − 342 = 1434±114 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −287
- 1495±57
- Hermann, James
- 10 1 4
- −54
- 1567±40
- Mandelbaum, Sean
- 8 8 6
- −2
- 1853±70
- Liu, Ethan
- 3 2 3
- Shim, Kern
- Rating Change
1757±59 − 22 = 1735±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1495±76
- Liu, Raymond
- 8 2 5
- −24
- 1690±85
- Chang, William
- 8 7 4
- 0
- 1268±52
- Mayevskiy, Yevgeniy
- 0 5 4
- Su, Mengjin
- Rating Change
1505±80 − 35 = 1470±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −24
- 1562±61
- Nguyen, Nha
- 4 4 −8 10
- −10
- 1623±44
- Antoniadis, Nikos
- −9 9 8 −12 2
- 0
- 1939±62
- Aikey, Tim
- 6 6 6
- Teodorescu, George
- Rating Change
1459±58 + 17 = 1476±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1503±81
- Le, Andy
- −8 10 −8 8 10
- −3
- 1676±61
- Eiles, Travis
- 6 5 9
- 0
- 1807±48
- Castle, Roger
- 10 3 9
- Wang, Maoxi George
- Rating Change
1898±82 − 36 = 1862±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1662±93
- Le, Ly Anh
- 9 2 1
- −44
- 1830±69
- Liu, Ethan
- 4 −6 −10 9 8
- +3
- 1613±49
- Xu, Zhongkai (John)
- 7 12 8
- Xu, Zhongkai (John)
- Rating Change
1628±53 − 18 = 1610±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 1601±94
- Le, Ly Anh
- 14 10 −3 −5 5
- −2
- 1846±68
- Wang, Maoxi George
- 7 12 8
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 39. Matches: 67. Club: Portland Table Tennis Club. State: Oregon (OR). Country: United States (USA). Director: Burns, Paige. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 13619. Submitted/revised: 2021-04-01 5:16 pm EDT. Last processed: 2024-03-20 7:57 am EDT.