Rochester Michigan June 9 2014 RR, 2014-06-09, Detailed Report

Rochester Michigan June 9 2014 RR
2014-06-09
Detailed Report

Dhar, Sinjan				Rating Change 1379±41 + 29 = 1408±36
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+16	1461±40	Wei, Tom	2–0	−4	1498±34	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
+13	1455±41	Zhang, Jason	2–0	−2	1561±36	Moy, Harold	3–1
+5	1336±52	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0	0	1733±38	Neal, Mark	2–0
0	1067±55	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0	0	1918±65	Johnson, Jeff	2–0
0	381±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0

El-Hayek, Francois				Rating Change 1480±36 + 19 = 1499±33
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+7	1455±40	Wei, Tom	2–0	−1	1733±38	Neal, Mark	2–0
+6	1448±42	Zhang, Jason	2–0	0	1918±65	Johnson, Jeff	2–0
+4	1413±37	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
+2	1328±51	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0
+1	1269±46	Moein, Arman	2–0
0	1067±55	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0
0	624±86	Soifer, Alan	2–0
0	381±131	Kodali, Dilip	3–0

Green, Charlie				Rating Change 1199±43 + 25 = 1224±41
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+22	1355±51	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	3–2	0	1733±38	Neal, Mark	2–0
+3	1074±57	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0
0	381±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0

Johnson, Jeff				Rating Change 1911±67 + 7 = 1918±65
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+6	1735±39	Neal, Mark	2–0
+1	1562±36	Moy, Harold	3–2
0	1501±33	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
0	1446±39	Wei, Tom	2–0
0	1439±40	Zhang, Jason	2–0
0	1408±36	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
0	1324±50	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0
0	1267±46	Moein, Arman	2–0
0	1066±55	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0
0*	624±86	Soifer, Alan	2–0
0*	624±86	Soifer, Alan	2–0
0	381±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0

Kaliappan, Kumaresan				Rating Change 1266±64 + 59 = 1325±50
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+47	1580±36	Moy, Harold	3–0	−33	1204±42	Green, Charlie	3–2
+38	1459±41	Zhang, Jason	2–0	−5	1405±37	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
+14	1281±48	Moein, Arman	3–1	−1	1500±34	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
0	624±86	Soifer, Alan	2–0	0	1733±38	Neal, Mark	3–2
0	381±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0	0	1918±65	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Kodali, Dilip				Rating Change 405±138 − 24 = 381±131
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
				−24	612±91	Soifer, Alan	2–0
				0	1066±55	Ruccolo, Ermanno	3–0
				0	1218±41	Green, Charlie	2–0
				0	1267±46	Moein, Arman	2–0
				0	1324±50	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0
				0	1407±36	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
				0	1439±40	Zhang, Jason	3–0
				0	1501±33	El-Hayek, Francois	3–0
				0	1562±36	Moy, Harold	2–0
				0	1733±38	Neal, Mark	2–0
				0	1918±65	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Moein, Arman				Rating Change 1283±50 − 14 = 1269±45
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+2	1069±56	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0	−12	1310±53	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	3–1
0	624±86	Soifer, Alan	2–0	−3	1436±41	Zhang, Jason	2–0
0	381±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0	−1	1500±34	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
				0	1733±38	Neal, Mark	2–0
				0	1918±65	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Moy, Harold				Rating Change 1572±39 − 13 = 1559±36
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+4	1449±40	Wei, Tom	2–0	−21	1287±51	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	3–0
+3	1443±41	Zhang, Jason	3–2	−2	1731±39	Neal, Mark	3–1
+2	1409±37	Dhar, Sinjan	3–1	0	1917±65	Johnson, Jeff	3–2
0	624±86	Soifer, Alan	2–0
0	381±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0

Neal, Mark				Rating Change 1731±40 + 2 = 1733±38
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+2	1564±36	Moy, Harold	3–1	−2	1912±66	Johnson, Jeff	2–0
+1	1502±34	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
0	1446±39	Wei, Tom	2–0
0	1439±40	Zhang, Jason	2–0
0	1408±36	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
0	1324±50	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	3–2
0	1267±46	Moein, Arman	2–0
0	1218±41	Green, Charlie	2–0
0	624±86	Soifer, Alan	2–0
0	381±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0

Ruccolo, Ermanno				Rating Change 1078±59 − 11 = 1067±55
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
0	624±86	Soifer, Alan	2–0	−7	1214±41	Green, Charlie	2–0
0	381±131	Kodali, Dilip	3–0	−4	1265±46	Moein, Arman	2–0
				0	1407±36	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
				0	1439±40	Zhang, Jason	3–0
				0	1501±33	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
				0	1918±65	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Soifer, Alan				Rating Change 612±91 + 12 = 624±86
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+12	405±138	Kodali, Dilip	2–0	0	1066±55	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0
				0	1267±46	Moein, Arman	2–0
				0	1324±50	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0
				0	1439±40	Zhang, Jason	3–0
				0	1501±33	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
				0	1562±36	Moy, Harold	2–0
				0	1733±38	Neal, Mark	2–0
				0*	1918±65	Johnson, Jeff	2–0
				0*	1918±65	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Wei, Tom				Rating Change 1478±43 − 31 = 1447±39
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
				−18	1394±37	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
				−9	1494±34	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
				−4	1557±36	Moy, Harold	2–0
				0	1733±38	Neal, Mark	2–0
				0	1918±65	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Zhang, Jason				Rating Change 1499±47 − 59 = 1440±40
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+2	1269±46	Moein, Arman	2–0	−28	1290±52	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0
0	1067±55	Ruccolo, Ermanno	3–0	−20	1393±37	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
0	624±86	Soifer, Alan	3–0	−9	1493±34	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
0	381±131	Kodali, Dilip	3–0	−4	1556±36	Moy, Harold	3–2
				0	1732±38	Neal, Mark	2–0
				0	1918±65	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating

Players: 13. Matches: 58. Club: Rochester Michigan Table Tennis Club. State: Michigan (MI). Country: United States (USA). Director: Neal, Mark. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 14939. Submitted/revised: 2014-06-10 7:36 pm EDT. Last processed: 2018-07-22 5:50 am EDT.

Rochester Michigan June 9 2014 RR2014-06-09Detailed Report

Rochester Michigan June 9 2014 RR
2014-06-09
Detailed Report