Rochester Michigan June 9 2014 RR, 2014-06-09, Detailed Report

Rochester Michigan June 9 2014 RR
2014-06-09
Detailed Report

Dhar, Sinjan				Rating Change 1394±44 + 32 = 1426±41
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+17	1477±40	Wei, Tom	2–0	−5	1517±36	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
+15	1469±42	Zhang, Jason	2–0	−2	1579±36	Moy, Harold	3–1
+6	1353±56	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0	0	1755±40	Neal, Mark	2–0
0	1071±56	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0	0	1939±67	Johnson, Jeff	2–0
0	382±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0

El-Hayek, Francois				Rating Change 1499±38 + 19 = 1518±36
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+7	1470±40	Wei, Tom	2–0	−1	1754±40	Neal, Mark	2–0
+6	1461±42	Zhang, Jason	2–0	0	1938±67	Johnson, Jeff	2–0
+4	1434±47	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
+2	1343±54	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0
+1	1277±47	Moein, Arman	2–0
0	1071±56	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0
0	627±88	Soifer, Alan	2–0
0	382±131	Kodali, Dilip	3–0

Green, Charlie				Rating Change 1205±44 + 28 = 1233±48
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+24	1374±55	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	3–2	0	1755±39	Neal, Mark	2–0
+3	1078±58	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0
0	382±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0

Johnson, Jeff				Rating Change 1931±70 + 8 = 1939±67
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+6	1757±41	Neal, Mark	2–0
+1	1580±36	Moy, Harold	3–2
0	1520±37	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
0	1462±39	Wei, Tom	2–0
0	1453±40	Zhang, Jason	2–0
0	1426±42	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
0	1338±52	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0
0	1275±46	Moein, Arman	2–0
0	1071±55	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0
0*	627±88	Soifer, Alan	2–0
0*	627±88	Soifer, Alan	2–0
0	382±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0

Kaliappan, Kumaresan				Rating Change 1278±66 + 62 = 1340±52
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+49	1599±37	Moy, Harold	3–0	−36	1210±44	Green, Charlie	3–2
+41	1473±41	Zhang, Jason	2–0	−5	1422±42	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
+14	1289±49	Moein, Arman	3–1	−1	1519±36	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
0	627±88	Soifer, Alan	2–0	0	1755±39	Neal, Mark	3–2
0	382±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0	0	1939±67	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Kodali, Dilip				Rating Change 407±139 − 25 = 382±131
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
				−24	615±92	Soifer, Alan	2–0
				0	1071±55	Ruccolo, Ermanno	3–0
				0	1226±44	Green, Charlie	2–0
				0	1275±46	Moein, Arman	2–0
				0	1338±52	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0
				0	1426±42	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
				0	1453±40	Zhang, Jason	3–0
				0	1520±36	El-Hayek, Francois	3–0
				0	1580±36	Moy, Harold	2–0
				0	1755±39	Neal, Mark	2–0
				0	1939±67	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Moein, Arman				Rating Change 1292±52 − 15 = 1277±46
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+2	1073±57	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0	−13	1324±55	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	3–1
0	627±88	Soifer, Alan	2–0	−3	1450±41	Zhang, Jason	2–0
0	382±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0	−1	1519±36	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
				0	1755±39	Neal, Mark	2–0
				0	1939±67	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Moy, Harold				Rating Change 1591±40 − 14 = 1577±36
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+4	1465±40	Wei, Tom	2–0	−22	1299±53	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	3–0
+3	1456±41	Zhang, Jason	3–2	−2	1753±40	Neal, Mark	3–1
+2	1429±44	Dhar, Sinjan	3–1	0	1938±68	Johnson, Jeff	3–2
0	627±88	Soifer, Alan	2–0
0	382±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0

Neal, Mark				Rating Change 1753±42 + 1 = 1754±40
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+2	1582±36	Moy, Harold	3–1	−3	1933±69	Johnson, Jeff	2–0
+1	1521±38	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
0	1462±39	Wei, Tom	2–0
0	1453±40	Zhang, Jason	2–0
0	1426±42	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
0	1339±52	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	3–2
0	1275±46	Moein, Arman	2–0
0	1226±44	Green, Charlie	2–0
0	627±88	Soifer, Alan	2–0
0	382±131	Kodali, Dilip	2–0

Ruccolo, Ermanno				Rating Change 1083±61 − 12 = 1071±56
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
0	627±88	Soifer, Alan	2–0	−8	1222±45	Green, Charlie	2–0
0	382±131	Kodali, Dilip	3–0	−4	1272±47	Moein, Arman	2–0
				0	1425±42	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
				0	1452±40	Zhang, Jason	3–0
				0	1520±36	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
				0	1939±67	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Soifer, Alan				Rating Change 615±93 + 12 = 627±88
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+12	406±139	Kodali, Dilip	2–0	0	1071±56	Ruccolo, Ermanno	2–0
				0	1275±46	Moein, Arman	2–0
				0	1338±52	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0
				0	1453±40	Zhang, Jason	3–0
				0	1520±36	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
				0	1580±36	Moy, Harold	2–0
				0	1755±39	Neal, Mark	2–0
				0*	1939±67	Johnson, Jeff	2–0
				0*	1939±67	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Wei, Tom				Rating Change 1495±45 − 32 = 1463±39
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
				−19	1409±41	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
				−9	1513±36	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
				−4	1576±37	Moy, Harold	2–0
				0	1754±40	Neal, Mark	2–0
				0	1938±67	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Zhang, Jason				Rating Change 1512±48 − 59 = 1453±40
Wins				Losses
Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score	Point Change	Opponent’s Rating	Opponent	Score
+2	1276±47	Moein, Arman	2–0	−29	1302±53	Kaliappan, Kumaresan	2–0
0	1071±56	Ruccolo, Ermanno	3–0	−19	1408±40	Dhar, Sinjan	2–0
0	627±88	Soifer, Alan	3–0	−9	1512±36	El-Hayek, Francois	2–0
0	382±131	Kodali, Dilip	3–0	−4	1575±37	Moy, Harold	3–2
				0	1754±40	Neal, Mark	2–0
				0	1938±67	Johnson, Jeff	2–0

Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating

Players: 13. Matches: 58. Club: Rochester Michigan Table Tennis Club. State: Michigan (MI). Country: United States (USA). Director: Neal, Mark. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 14939. Submitted/revised: 2014-06-10 7:36 pm EDT. Last processed: 2019-10-01 10:01 am EDT.

Rochester Michigan June 9 2014 RR2014-06-09Detailed Report

Rochester Michigan June 9 2014 RR
2014-06-09
Detailed Report