2012 NSW Veterans Open
2012-07-29
Detailed Report
- Aboud, Ashraf
- Rating Change
1222±116 − 8 = 1214±112 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1524±87
- Wood, Peter G
- 3 6 4
- −1
- 1757±136
- Nguyen, Hung The
- 2 0 2
- Aduckiewicz, Jennifer
- Rating Change
1405±67 + 37 = 1442±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1470±63
- McKeough, Lynne
- 5 8 −9 −12 9
- −15
- 1489±67
- Veerhuis, Rosemarie
- 6 −8 10 −10 2
- +12
- 1348±64
- Towers, Rosemary
- 7 4 8
- −6
- 1558±63
- Whiteford, Leonie
- 7 9 −10 9
- +9
- 1337±65
- Morgan, Joylene
- 4 −10 8 −8 8
- +4
- 1262±62
- Cowie, Carol
- −9 −9 4 5 9
- +2
- 1197±90
- Morley, Barbara
- 4 8 5
- Alisch, Kris
- Rating Change
1146±127 + 345 = 1491±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +173*
- 1632±66
- Dang, Van
- −8 8 6 −8 9
- 0*
- 1632±66
- Dang, Van
- −6 3 5 9
- +89
- 1485±61
- McKeough, Lynne
- 5 9 7
- +51
- 1468±65
- Pinkewich, Marie
- 7 7 −6 −9 5
- +21
- 1383±62
- Flood, Allison
- 8 4 10
- +11
- 1337±59
- Ly, Ada
- −11 9 6 −6 3
- Antoun, Michael
- Rating Change
1678±74 + 63 = 1741±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1702±62
- Chambers, Scott
- −7 8 −9 9 8
- −1
- 2080±53
- Robson, Richard Bill
- 3 6 7
- +18
- 1659±94
- Evans, Brett W
- 6 9 4
- +9
- 1583±74
- Finlay, Ian
- −10 2 8 7
- +4
- 1506±82
- Mullard, Cary
- −7 4 −9 13 10
- Azimi, Mohammad
- Rating Change
1785±69 − 74 = 1711±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −53
- 1532±88
- Crane, Matthew
- −6 9 8 7
- −17
- 1780±62
- Cao, Quy
- 6 −5 12 −7 6
- −4
- 1922±54
- Braker, Gary
- 7 3 5
- 0
- 2079±53
- Robson, Richard Bill
- 3 8 7
- Bowrey, Michael
- Rating Change
1883±74 + 8 = 1891±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +40
- 2024±65
- Tran, Hien
- 10 −10 5 −8 9
- −29
- 1878±64
- Ly, Walter
- 4 5 −9 10
- +10
- 1790±77
- Chen, Zheng Zhong Steven
- −10 8 −8 4 9
- −18
- 1885±74
- Tanner, Richard
- −8 −10 6 7 6
- +3
- 1683±58
- Chambers, Scott
- 6 −7 −3 8 10
- +2
- 1664±53
- Moody, Paul
- 2 7 10
- Boyd, Joy
- Rating Change
1050±101 − 90 = 960±77 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3*
- 631±122
- Ly, Betty
- 6 4 2
- −74
- 926±84
- Noonan, Leslie
- 9 −9 −3 8 8
- +3*
- 631±122
- Ly, Betty
- 6 9 −6 7
- −21
- 1077±69
- Davies, Beryl
- 9 7 7
- Boyd, Tom
- Rating Change
1545±84 − 34 = 1511±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1374±64
- Kuiper, Bernard
- −8 8 9 −6 4
- −56
- 1419±60
- Ly, Robert
- 11 9 −11 −6 9
- +8
- 1351±144
- Trinh, Chi
- 4 1 6
- +3
- 1243±98
- Fitzpatrick, Desmond
- 13 8 5
- 0
- 1039±140
- Metzner, Horst-Dieter
- 2 6 12
- Boyton, Graham
- Rating Change
1534±81 + 2 = 1536±70 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1446±132
- Chung, George
- 7 5 −7 5
- −14
- 1672±58
- Chambers, Scott
- −10 −5 7 8 5
- Braker, Gary
- Rating Change
1917±70 + 20 = 1937±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0*
- 1899±74
- Ly, Walter
- −8 −6 8 9 5
- −6*
- 1899±74
- Ly, Walter
- 6 −6 12 1
- +13
- 1849±85
- Judge, Bruce
- 2 3 7
- −6
- 2075±54
- Robson, Richard Bill
- 4 −8 8 −3 10
- +8
- 1842±176
- Nguyen, Hung The
- 8 −9 6 5
- +8
- 1813±64
- Cao, Quy
- 5 −6 11 7
- +3
- 1718±62
- Azimi, Mohammad
- 7 3 5
- +1
- 1651±66
- Tam, Kwan Sing Richard
- 2 5 8
- Bruton, Stephen
- Rating Change
1434±81 + 0 = 1434±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1382±82
- Turner, Michael
- 7 4 −7 9
- −20
- 1522±73
- Morden, Gavin
- 5 6 5
- −2
- 1714±87
- Lee, Ellman
- 5 3 3
- 0
- 1981±58
- Ngo, Tin
- 3 5 2
- Cai, Janssy
- Rating Change
1577±102 − 97 = 1480±87 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −78
- 1369±136
- Hoshino, Hitomi
- 11 −8 7 8
- −19
- 1629±67
- Saad, Maha
- 5 −6 8 4
- Cao, Quy
- Rating Change
1818±77 − 17 = 1801±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1726±63
- Azimi, Mohammad
- 6 −5 12 −7 6
- −21
- 1886±64
- Ly, Walter
- 8 −8 −8 3 9
- −11
- 1921±54
- Braker, Gary
- 5 −6 11 7
- Chambers, Scott
- Rating Change
1681±70 − 2 = 1679±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1553±80
- Boyton, Graham
- −10 −5 7 8 5
- −21
- 1715±70
- Antoun, Michael
- −7 8 −9 9 8
- +9
- 1548±92
- Wood, Peter G
- 9 4 10
- −4
- 1878±57
- Bowrey, Michael
- 6 −7 −3 8 10
- +3
- 1409±123
- Chung, George
- 8 11 6
- +2
- 1341±155
- Forbes, John Richard
- 7 2 7
- Chan, Wing Kwai
- Rating Change
1249±73 + 24 = 1273±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +43
- 1440±105
- Chichkan, Walter
- 4 5 −11 10
- −14
- 1356±64
- Kuiper, Bernard
- 16 −7 9 4
- +6
- 1070±148
- Metzner, Horst-Dieter
- 5 6 6
- −10
- 1369±76
- Fisher, Gary
- −2 6 9 3
- −1
- 1590±74
- Cope, Kevin
- 9 6 3
- Chen, Zheng Zhong Steven
- Rating Change
1766±82 + 0 = 1766±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1662±68
- Tam, Kwan Sing Richard
- 3 11 5
- −18
- 1873±57
- Bowrey, Michael
- −10 8 −8 4 9
- +1
- 1335±153
- Forbes, John Richard
- 6 2 9
- Chichkan, Walter
- Rating Change
1387±114 − 37 = 1350±81 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +61
- 1387±65
- Kuiper, Bernard
- 12 8 −8 7
- −98
- 1234±64
- Chan, Wing Kwai
- 4 5 −11 10
- Chung, George
- Rating Change
1477±148 − 83 = 1394±116 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −73
- 1521±73
- Boyton, Graham
- 7 5 −7 5
- −11
- 1674±57
- Chambers, Scott
- 8 11 6
- Cope, Kevin
- Rating Change
1565±80 + 26 = 1591±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1462±61
- Ly, Robert
- 6 7 −11 9
- +7
- 1393±78
- Fisher, Gary
- 9 −6 8 8
- +1
- 1269±60
- Chan, Wing Kwai
- 9 6 3
- +1
- 1131±167
- Mundy, John
- 3 6 1
- Cowie, Carol
- Rating Change
1341±71 − 87 = 1254±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −55
- 1103±84
- Morley, Barbara
- −6 7 6 10
- −27
- 1262±67
- Pha, Anna B
- 4 −9 9 6
- −5
- 1440±53
- Aduckiewicz, Jennifer
- −9 −9 4 5 9
- Crane, Matthew
- Rating Change
1490±107 + 129 = 1619±82 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +117
- 1756±61
- Azimi, Mohammad
- −6 9 8 7
- −6
- 1791±75
- Wong, Chau-Hung James
- 3 −7 2 3
- +19
- 1475±66
- Tai, Stephen
- −8 9 3 8
- 0
- 2080±53
- Robson, Richard Bill
- 3 3 3
- Croccolo-Brugnoli, Armida
- Rating Change
922±79 − 42 = 880±70 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −41
- 856±77
- Leddy, Etheny
- 7 4 9
- −1
- 1261±78
- Edwards, Elaine
- 5 4 3
- Dang, Van
- Rating Change
1625±77 − 25 = 1600±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1585±70
- Whiteford, Leonie
- 6 1 5
- −43*
- 1435±78
- Alisch, Kris
- −8 8 6 −8 9
- 0*
- 1435±78
- Alisch, Kris
- −6 3 5 9
- −6
- 1765±81
- Morden, Eriko
- 9 5 7
- +1
- 1308±54
- Ly, Ada
- 8 8 7
- Davies, Beryl
- Rating Change
1086±74 + 5 = 1091±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 986±85
- Boyd, Joy
- 9 7 7
- −10
- 1253±79
- Edwards, Elaine
- 4 −9 8 9
- 0
- 627±120
- Ly, Betty
- 8 −7 7 6
- Edwards, Elaine
- Rating Change
1250±80 + 13 = 1263±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1107±72
- Davies, Beryl
- 4 −9 8 9
- +1
- 897±70
- Leddy, Etheny
- 8 2 8
- +1
- 885±71
- Croccolo-Brugnoli, Armida
- 5 4 3
- +1
- 855±74
- Hutchinson, Gillian
- 6 6 8
- Evans, Brett W
- Rating Change
1653±98 − 25 = 1628±83 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1340±120
- Lee, Daniel
- 4 4 4
- −33
- 1720±70
- Antoun, Michael
- 6 9 4
- +2
- 1226±126
- Wood, Michael
- 6 8 6
- 0
- 2080±53
- Robson, Richard Bill
- 7 5 7
- Finlay, Ian
- Rating Change
1536±75 + 36 = 1572±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1608±164
- Olsen, Robert
- −6 −9 10 4 8
- −8
- 1730±71
- Antoun, Michael
- −10 2 8 7
- +21
- 1530±86
- Mullard, Cary
- 4 9 10
- −1
- 1921±77
- Le, Inh Van
- 8 8 1
- Fisher, Gary
- Rating Change
1365±88 + 20 = 1385±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1280±62
- Chan, Wing Kwai
- −2 6 9 3
- −9
- 1586±75
- Cope, Kevin
- 9 −6 8 8
- +8
- 1177±184
- Mundy, John
- 4 8 8
- −3
- 1667±64
- Wetsteyn, Hans
- −6 6 4 −12 3
- +3
- 1047±143
- Metzner, Horst-Dieter
- 4 −8 3 6
- Fitzpatrick, Desmond
- Rating Change
1282±117 − 48 = 1234±94 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −43
- 1355±63
- Kuiper, Bernard
- 6 9 5
- −6
- 1518±65
- Boyd, Tom
- 13 8 5
- Flood, Allison
- Rating Change
1371±68 − 6 = 1365±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10*
- 1354±138
- Olsen, Zoe
- 7 5 −8 −8 6
- −21
- 1400±66
- Pinkewich, Marie
- −7 5 −6 9 9
- +10*
- 1354±138
- Olsen, Zoe
- 8 3 −9 −4 8
- −9
- 1466±78
- Alisch, Kris
- 8 4 10
- +4
- 1143±179
- Sturgeon, Donna
- 3 3 2
- Flood, Douglas
- Rating Change
1468±123 − 40 = 1428±116 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −40
- 1525±166
- Nakazawa, Shin
- 5 7 5
- 0
- 2080±53
- Robson, Richard Bill
- 3 3 5
- Forbes, John Richard
- Rating Change
1505±230 − 182 = 1323±148 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −150
- 1506±89
- Wood, Peter G
- 5 7 5
- −20
- 1641±66
- Tam, Kwan Sing Richard
- 8 10 5
- −9
- 1674±57
- Chambers, Scott
- 7 2 7
- −3
- 1767±70
- Chen, Zheng Zhong Steven
- 6 2 9
- Heginbotham, Wayne
- Rating Change
2110±80 + 38 = 2148±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 2097±59
- Robson, Richard Bill
- 12 8 −5 −7 7
- +5
- 1921±74
- Tanner, Richard
- 7 12 10
- +1
- 1796±75
- Wong, Chau-Hung James
- 2 −11 5 5
- 0
- 1479±128
- Olsen, Robert
- 2 5 5
- 0
- 1261±153
- Saleeby, Damien
- 6 3 5
- Ho, Angus
- Rating Change
1600±200 + 85 = 1685±103 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +106
- 1552±71
- Morden, Gavin
- 8 4 −7 −10 12
- −55
- 1815±78
- Judge, Bruce
- 11 6 5
- +40
- 1552±64
- Phan, Han
- 10 −6 6 −4 9
- −5
- 1984±60
- Tran, Hien
- −7 5 2 −9 5
- Hoang, Truong
- Rating Change
1828±94 + 150 = 1978±88 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +98
- 2064±81
- Pinkewich, Paul
- 8 6 8
- +51
- 1984±90
- Le, Inh Van
- −5 8 9 −4 5
- 0
- 1467±74
- Lees, John
- 5 4 6
- 0
- 1275±154
- Mowle, Peter
- 5 3 5
- Hoshino, Hitomi
- Rating Change
1393±148 + 100 = 1493±103 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +122
- 1539±91
- Cai, Janssy
- 11 −8 7 8
- −22
- 1641±65
- Saad, Maha
- 3 6 7
- Hutchinson, Gillian
- Rating Change
855±74 + 0 = 855±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −1
- 1261±78
- Edwards, Elaine
- 6 6 8
- Judge, Bruce
- Rating Change
1828±99 + 3 = 1831±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1737±129
- Ho, Angus
- 11 6 5
- −29
- 1920±54
- Braker, Gary
- 2 3 7
- +11
- 1656±67
- Tam, Kwan Sing Richard
- 8 8 4
- −4
- 2078±54
- Robson, Richard Bill
- 8 7 8
- +3
- 1543±64
- Phan, Han
- 6 5 3
- Kaudoor, Shrirama
- Rating Change
1600±200 + 14 = 1614±155 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +49
- 1372±174
- Malkov, Mark
- 9 −6 10 8
- −35
- 1896±62
- Ly, Walter
- 6 7 2
- Khachiki, Michel
- Rating Change
1719±75 − 48 = 1671±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −43
- 1637±55
- Moody, Paul
- 9 5 9
- −4
- 1906±72
- Tanner, Richard
- 8 −9 6 12
- −1
- 1983±60
- Tran, Hien
- 4 0 6
- Kuiper, Bernard
- Rating Change
1371±74 − 14 = 1357±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1279±62
- Chan, Wing Kwai
- 16 −7 9 4
- −37
- 1296±90
- Chichkan, Walter
- 12 8 −8 7
- +12
- 1269±108
- Fitzpatrick, Desmond
- 6 9 5
- −6
- 1514±66
- Boyd, Tom
- −8 8 9 −6 4
- Kwan, Louis
- Rating Change
1581±108 + 87 = 1668±87 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +91
- 1744±72
- Solo, Brett
- −4 9 −10 5 9
- −5
- 1898±63
- Ly, Walter
- −7 −6 3 9 7
- +1
- 1169±133
- Mak, Berry
- −9 0 4 5
- Le, Inh Van
- Rating Change
1975±92 − 41 = 1934±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1670±65
- Wetsteyn, Hans
- 4 5 −8 −6 5
- −47
- 1927±92
- Hoang, Truong
- −5 8 9 −4 5
- +1
- 1567±66
- Finlay, Ian
- 8 8 1
- +1
- 1480±129
- Olsen, Robert
- 5 9 7
- 0
- 1125±163
- Mundy, John
- 2 2 1
- Leddy, Etheny
- Rating Change
876±84 + 20 = 896±70 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +40
- 920±77
- Croccolo-Brugnoli, Armida
- 7 4 9
- −19
- 979±76
- Tulloch, Dianne
- 3 6 14
- −1
- 1261±78
- Edwards, Elaine
- 8 2 8
- 0
- 1297±64
- Pha, Anna B
- 5 6 6
- Lee, Daniel
- Rating Change
1340±120 − 11 = 1329±115 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1615±84
- Evans, Brett W
- 4 4 4
- Lee, Ellman
- Rating Change
1762±107 − 20 = 1742±91 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1438±69
- Bruton, Stephen
- 5 3 3
- −25
- 1903±72
- Tanner, Richard
- 10 −11 7 8
- +1
- 1358±76
- Turner, Michael
- 3 5 7
- Lees, John
- Rating Change
1409±89 + 62 = 1471±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +53
- 1479±64
- Ly, Robert
- 7 8 9
- −6
- 1666±64
- Wetsteyn, Hans
- 5 5 3
- +15
- 1385±189
- Mowle, Peter
- 6 6 2
- 0
- 1975±88
- Hoang, Truong
- 5 4 6
- Ly, Ada
- Rating Change
1300±67 + 30 = 1330±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 1363±65
- Towers, Rosemary
- 11 7 −5 4
- −7
- 1475±77
- Alisch, Kris
- −11 9 6 −6 3
- +7*
- 1203±86
- Nolan, Jennifer
- 6 8 4
- −2*
- 1561±63
- Whiteford, Leonie
- −9 2 1 11
- +7*
- 1203±86
- Nolan, Jennifer
- 8 10 −7 12
- −2*
- 1561±63
- Whiteford, Leonie
- 5 3 7
- −2
- 1576±62
- Dang, Van
- 8 8 7
- Ly, Betty
- Rating Change
641±126 − 17 = 624±119 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6*
- 960±80
- Boyd, Joy
- 6 4 2
- −6*
- 960±80
- Boyd, Joy
- 6 9 −6 7
- −4
- 975±78
- Noonan, Leslie
- 10 7 −10 6
- −1
- 1096±66
- Davies, Beryl
- 8 −7 7 6
- Ly, Robert
- Rating Change
1464±76 − 8 = 1456±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 1568±82
- Boyd, Tom
- 11 9 −11 −6 9
- −34
- 1426±81
- Lees, John
- 7 8 9
- +1
- 1040±141
- Metzner, Horst-Dieter
- −12 7 7 8
- −9
- 1577±77
- Cope, Kevin
- 6 7 −11 9
- −3
- 1664±65
- Wetsteyn, Hans
- 2 4 8
- Ly, Walter
- Rating Change
1828±80 + 87 = 1915±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33*
- 1948±59
- Braker, Gary
- 6 −6 12 1
- 0*
- 1948±59
- Braker, Gary
- −8 −6 8 9 5
- +33
- 1911±64
- Bowrey, Michael
- 4 5 −9 10
- +14
- 1823±66
- Cao, Quy
- 8 −8 −8 3 9
- +3
- 1664±93
- Kwan, Louis
- −7 −6 3 9 7
- +4
- 1653±179
- Kaudoor, Shrirama
- 6 7 2
- 0
- 1337±164
- Malkov, Mark
- 7 6 4
- Mak, Berry
- Rating Change
1169±133 − 2 = 1167±132 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 1648±86
- Kwan, Louis
- −9 0 4 5
- −1
- 1701±65
- Solo, Brett
- 6 4 7
- Malkov, Mark
- Rating Change
1383±184 − 56 = 1327±159 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −56
- 1549±172
- Kaudoor, Shrirama
- 9 −6 10 8
- −1
- 1899±62
- Ly, Walter
- 7 6 4
- McKeough, Lynne
- Rating Change
1503±72 − 45 = 1458±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1435±65
- Pinkewich, Marie
- 7 8 11
- −40
- 1426±53
- Aduckiewicz, Jennifer
- 5 8 −9 −12 9
- −24
- 1441±77
- Alisch, Kris
- 5 9 7
- Metzner, Horst-Dieter
- Rating Change
1101±162 − 59 = 1042±140 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −46
- 1260±61
- Chan, Wing Kwai
- 5 6 6
- −9
- 1378±73
- Fisher, Gary
- 4 −8 3 6
- −3
- 1450±58
- Ly, Robert
- −12 7 7 8
- −1
- 1521±65
- Boyd, Tom
- 2 6 12
- Moody, Paul
- Rating Change
1683±65 − 29 = 1654±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1696±68
- Khachiki, Michel
- 9 5 9
- −33
- 1564±89
- Ngo, Phoutthasak Peter
- 5 7 9
- −16
- 1674±70
- Solo, Brett
- 10 −8 9 5
- −2
- 1878±57
- Bowrey, Michael
- 2 7 10
- Morden, Eriko
- Rating Change
1749±84 + 29 = 1778±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1661±70
- Saad, Maha
- −6 7 8 8
- +8
- 1585±64
- Dang, Van
- 9 5 7
- Morden, Gavin
- Rating Change
1537±76 + 4 = 1541±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1454±74
- Bruton, Stephen
- 5 6 5
- −14
- 1655±123
- Ho, Angus
- 8 4 −7 −10 12
- 0
- 1981±58
- Ngo, Tin
- 5 7 6
- 0
- 1985±59
- Tran, Hien
- 6 6 7
- Morgan, Joylene
- Rating Change
1366±73 − 47 = 1319±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −37
- 1304±62
- Towers, Rosemary
- 14 9 −11 9
- −11
- 1438±53
- Aduckiewicz, Jennifer
- 4 −10 8 −8 8
- Morley, Barbara
- Rating Change
1094±93 + 94 = 1188±83 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +87
- 1293±62
- Cowie, Carol
- −6 7 6 10
- −2
- 1447±51
- Aduckiewicz, Jennifer
- 4 8 5
- +11
- 998±85
- Noonan, Leslie
- 10 5 9
- −1
- 1503±66
- Veerhuis, Rosemarie
- 6 7 4
- Mowle, Peter
- Rating Change
1400±200 − 111 = 1289±155 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −110
- 1450±75
- Lees, John
- 6 6 2
- 0
- 1974±88
- Hoang, Truong
- 5 3 5
- Mullard, Cary
- Rating Change
1552±96 − 52 = 1500±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −46
- 1543±68
- Finlay, Ian
- 4 9 10
- −7
- 1729±71
- Antoun, Michael
- −7 4 −9 13 10
- Mundy, John
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 71 = 1129±164 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −67
- 1374±73
- Fisher, Gary
- 4 8 8
- −4
- 1589±74
- Cope, Kevin
- 3 6 1
- 0
- 1921±76
- Le, Inh Van
- 2 2 1
- Nakazawa, Shin
- Rating Change
1527±167 + 74 = 1601±133 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +76
- 1467±123
- Flood, Douglas
- 5 7 5
- −1
- 2080±53
- Robson, Richard Bill
- 3 7 10
- Ngo, Phoutthasak Peter
- Rating Change
1585±96 + 41 = 1626±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +65
- 1684±55
- Moody, Paul
- 5 7 9
- −24
- 1689±68
- Solo, Brett
- 8 −8 4 1
- Ngo, Tin
- Rating Change
1989±65 + 2 = 1991±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1938±80
- Tanner, Richard
- 6 3 7
- −14
- 2070±55
- Robson, Richard Bill
- 6 −6 8 7
- +1
- 1704±66
- Solo, Brett
- 6 11 4
- 0
- 1538±69
- Morden, Gavin
- 5 7 6
- 0
- 1436±68
- Bruton, Stephen
- 3 5 2
- Nguyen, Hung The
- Rating Change
1800±200 − 39 = 1761±132 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 1537±87
- Wood, Peter G
- 7 3 7
- −84
- 1922±53
- Braker, Gary
- 8 −9 6 5
- +1
- 1214±112
- Aboud, Ashraf
- 2 0 2
- Nolan, Jennifer
- Rating Change
1226±94 − 61 = 1165±77 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −24*
- 1290±56
- Ly, Ada
- 6 8 4
- −24*
- 1290±56
- Ly, Ada
- 8 10 −7 12
- −12
- 1322±61
- Towers, Rosemary
- 7 2 5
- −1
- 1564±62
- Whiteford, Leonie
- 8 6 6
- Noonan, Leslie
- Rating Change
936±93 + 47 = 983±79 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +53
- 1014±86
- Boyd, Joy
- 9 −9 −3 8 8
- −8
- 1180±86
- Morley, Barbara
- 10 5 9
- +2
- 634±123
- Ly, Betty
- 10 7 −10 6
- 0*
- 1503±66
- Veerhuis, Rosemarie
- 4 5 2
- 0*
- 1503±66
- Veerhuis, Rosemarie
- 6 4 5
- Olsen, Robert
- Rating Change
1600±200 − 119 = 1481±127 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 1281±159
- Saleeby, Damien
- 7 6 −7 4
- −155
- 1550±66
- Finlay, Ian
- −6 −9 10 4 8
- −2
- 1917±77
- Le, Inh Van
- 5 9 7
- 0
- 2140±75
- Heginbotham, Wayne
- 2 5 5
- Olsen, Zoe
- Rating Change
1400±200 − 183 = 1217±104 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +46
- 1132±166
- Sturgeon, Donna
- 0 2 2
- −106*
- 1329±58
- Flood, Allison
- 7 5 −8 −8 6
- −106*
- 1329±58
- Flood, Allison
- 8 3 −9 −4 8
- −18
- 1407±63
- Pinkewich, Marie
- 11 6 7
- Pha, Anna B
- Rating Change
1270±74 + 21 = 1291±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +28
- 1277±63
- Cowie, Carol
- 4 −9 9 6
- −5*
- 1497±67
- Veerhuis, Rosemarie
- 7 9 3
- +2
- 998±74
- Tulloch, Dianne
- −8 8 5 6
- −5*
- 1497±67
- Veerhuis, Rosemarie
- 7 9 10
- 0
- 896±70
- Leddy, Etheny
- 5 6 6
- Phan, Han
- Rating Change
1555±66 − 14 = 1541±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1648±126
- Ho, Angus
- 10 −6 6 −4 9
- −2
- 1820±78
- Judge, Bruce
- 6 5 3
- Pinkewich, Marie
- Rating Change
1478±86 − 51 = 1427±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1356±59
- Flood, Allison
- −7 5 −6 9 9
- −48
- 1415±61
- McKeough, Lynne
- 7 8 11
- +7
- 1267±117
- Olsen, Zoe
- 11 6 7
- −24
- 1449±77
- Alisch, Kris
- 7 7 −6 −9 5
- −4
- 1638±66
- Saad, Maha
- −8 7 6 3
- Pinkewich, Paul
- Rating Change
2060±82 − 47 = 2013±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1798±76
- Wong, Chau-Hung James
- 12 5 6
- −52
- 1902±89
- Hoang, Truong
- 8 6 8
- 0
- 1543±104
- Russell, Alan
- 10 5 6
- Robson, Richard Bill
- Rating Change
2076±62 + 5 = 2081±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1995±63
- Ngo, Tin
- 6 −6 8 7
- −16
- 2115±79
- Heginbotham, Wayne
- 12 8 −5 −7 7
- +6
- 1935±55
- Braker, Gary
- 4 −8 8 −3 10
- +2
- 1828±79
- Judge, Bruce
- 8 7 8
- +1
- 1738±72
- Antoun, Michael
- 3 6 7
- 0
- 1715±60
- Azimi, Mohammad
- 3 8 7
- 0
- 1623±82
- Crane, Matthew
- 3 3 3
- 0
- 1621±82
- Evans, Brett W
- 7 5 7
- 0
- 1603±134
- Nakazawa, Shin
- 3 7 10
- 0
- 1428±116
- Flood, Douglas
- 3 3 5
- Russell, Alan
- Rating Change
1534±108 + 7 = 1541±103 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1234±129
- Wood, Michael
- −9 14 6 −7 4
- −1
- 2005±67
- Pinkewich, Paul
- 10 5 6
- Saad, Maha
- Rating Change
1628±76 + 17 = 1645±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1533±116
- Hoshino, Hitomi
- 3 6 7
- −12
- 1765±81
- Morden, Eriko
- −6 7 8 8
- +11
- 1508±94
- Cai, Janssy
- 5 −6 8 4
- +4
- 1425±63
- Pinkewich, Marie
- −8 7 6 3
- Saleeby, Damien
- Rating Change
1281±159 − 43 = 1238±148 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −42
- 1439±146
- Olsen, Robert
- 7 6 −7 4
- 0
- 2141±75
- Heginbotham, Wayne
- 6 3 5
- Solo, Brett
- Rating Change
1707±83 − 2 = 1705±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 1675±54
- Moody, Paul
- 10 −8 9 5
- −52
- 1574±100
- Kwan, Louis
- −4 9 −10 5 9
- +19
- 1652±83
- Ngo, Phoutthasak Peter
- 8 −8 4 1
- −2
- 1979±58
- Ngo, Tin
- 6 11 4
- 0
- 1165±131
- Mak, Berry
- 6 4 7
- Sturgeon, Donna
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 142 = 1058±148 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −119
- 1200±131
- Olsen, Zoe
- 0 2 2
- −23
- 1341±57
- Flood, Allison
- 3 3 2
- Tai, Stephen
- Rating Change
1486±70 − 20 = 1466±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1602±90
- Crane, Matthew
- −8 9 3 8
- −6
- 1663±65
- Wetsteyn, Hans
- 7 −6 9 −7 5
- −1*
- 1790±75
- Wong, Chau-Hung James
- 4 6 6
- −1*
- 1790±75
- Wong, Chau-Hung James
- 6 2 3
- Tam, Kwan Sing Richard
- Rating Change
1667±75 − 24 = 1643±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1343±156
- Forbes, John Richard
- 8 10 5
- −17
- 1756±74
- Chen, Zheng Zhong Steven
- 3 11 5
- −8
- 1811±81
- Judge, Bruce
- 8 8 4
- −2
- 1927±53
- Braker, Gary
- 2 5 8
- Tanner, Richard
- Rating Change
1754±98 + 159 = 1913±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +100
- 2030±64
- Tran, Hien
- 4 9 8
- −10
- 1978±58
- Ngo, Tin
- 6 3 7
- +49
- 1916±64
- Bowrey, Michael
- −8 −10 6 7 6
- −1
- 2140±75
- Heginbotham, Wayne
- 7 12 10
- +12
- 1768±105
- Lee, Ellman
- 10 −11 7 8
- +5
- 1684±66
- Khachiki, Michel
- 8 −9 6 12
- +4
- 1628±182
- Zeng, Lyman
- 6 7 5
- 0
- 1263±81
- Young, Geoffrey
- 6 4 8
- Towers, Rosemary
- Rating Change
1344±82 − 16 = 1328±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1344±65
- Morgan, Joylene
- 14 9 −11 9
- −45
- 1286±56
- Ly, Ada
- 11 7 −5 4
- +8
- 1181±81
- Nolan, Jennifer
- 7 2 5
- −10
- 1440±52
- Aduckiewicz, Jennifer
- 7 4 8
- Tran, Hien
- Rating Change
2080±73 − 100 = 1980±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1694±112
- Ho, Angus
- −7 5 2 −9 5
- −62
- 1843±54
- Bowrey, Michael
- 10 −10 5 −8 9
- +1
- 1669±63
- Khachiki, Michel
- 4 0 6
- −42
- 1853±70
- Tanner, Richard
- 4 9 8
- 0
- 1538±69
- Morden, Gavin
- 6 6 7
- Trinh, Chi
- Rating Change
1351±144 − 37 = 1314±127 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −37
- 1515±65
- Boyd, Tom
- 4 1 6
- Tulloch, Dianne
- Rating Change
982±78 + 18 = 1000±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 915±75
- Leddy, Etheny
- 3 6 14
- −2
- 1296±65
- Pha, Anna B
- −8 8 5 6
- Turner, Michael
- Rating Change
1384±83 − 31 = 1353±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −29
- 1414±72
- Bruton, Stephen
- 7 4 −7 9
- −1
- 1716±87
- Lee, Ellman
- 3 5 7
- Veerhuis, Rosemarie
- Rating Change
1480±70 + 34 = 1514±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1464±56
- Aduckiewicz, Jennifer
- 6 −8 10 −10 2
- +4*
- 1312±73
- Pha, Anna B
- 7 9 3
- +4*
- 1312±73
- Pha, Anna B
- 7 9 10
- +1
- 1191±87
- Morley, Barbara
- 6 7 4
- 0*
- 978±77
- Noonan, Leslie
- 4 5 2
- 0*
- 978±77
- Noonan, Leslie
- 6 4 5
- Wetsteyn, Hans
- Rating Change
1669±77 − 1 = 1668±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1473±77
- Lees, John
- 5 5 3
- −16
- 1779±77
- Wong, Chau-Hung James
- 4 3 10
- +5
- 1460±64
- Tai, Stephen
- 7 −6 9 −7 5
- −3
- 1917±78
- Le, Inh Van
- 4 5 −8 −6 5
- +4
- 1456±59
- Ly, Robert
- 2 4 8
- +2
- 1386±74
- Fisher, Gary
- −6 6 4 −12 3
- Whiteford, Leonie
- Rating Change
1573±73 − 13 = 1560±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1455±54
- Aduckiewicz, Jennifer
- 7 9 −10 9
- −30
- 1553±65
- Dang, Van
- 6 1 5
- +2*
- 1311±55
- Ly, Ada
- −9 2 1 11
- +2*
- 1311±55
- Ly, Ada
- 5 3 7
- 0
- 1170±78
- Nolan, Jennifer
- 8 6 6
- Wong, Chau-Hung James
- Rating Change
1775±85 + 25 = 1800±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1683±70
- Wetsteyn, Hans
- 4 3 10
- −7
- 2000±68
- Pinkewich, Paul
- 12 5 6
- +11
- 1640±89
- Crane, Matthew
- 3 −7 2 3
- −1
- 2140±75
- Heginbotham, Wayne
- 2 −11 5 5
- +1*
- 1459±64
- Tai, Stephen
- 4 6 6
- +1*
- 1459±64
- Tai, Stephen
- 6 2 3
- Wood, Michael
- Rating Change
1237±131 − 15 = 1222±125 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1533±108
- Russell, Alan
- −9 14 6 −7 4
- −3
- 1618±83
- Evans, Brett W
- 6 8 6
- Wood, Peter G
- Rating Change
1527±102 − 7 = 1520±83 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1378±162
- Forbes, John Richard
- 5 7 5
- −21
- 1672±58
- Chambers, Scott
- 9 4 10
- +5
- 1220±115
- Aboud, Ashraf
- 3 6 4
- −11
- 1721±155
- Nguyen, Hung The
- 7 3 7
- Young, Geoffrey
- Rating Change
1268±83 − 7 = 1261±80 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1528±167
- Zeng, Lyman
- −10 6 7 3
- 0
- 1913±70
- Tanner, Richard
- 6 4 8
- Zeng, Lyman
- Rating Change
1600±200 − 4 = 1596±159 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +28
- 1267±82
- Young, Geoffrey
- −10 6 7 3
- −32
- 1909±71
- Tanner, Richard
- 6 7 5
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 97. Matches: 183. Club: Table Tennis Australia. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: James, Brian. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 17008. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-09 1:28 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-03-20 7:57 am EDT.