MPTTA 2015 Winter C Rnd 10
2015-10-19
Detailed Report
- Blaze, John
- Rating Change
839±60 + 20 = 859±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 873±98
- Lilley, Zac
- 8 11 2
- −3*
- 825±69
- Craig, James
- 8 4 −9 9
- +11
- 862±117
- Graffen, Kade
- 7 6 6
- −14
- 852±66
- James, Adam
- 6 8 11
- +13
- 855±47
- Craig, Hamish
- 7 −11 7 −8 5
- −8
- 906±40
- Johnson, Margaret
- 9 4 9
- 0*
- 825±69
- Craig, James
- 7 12 8
- −3*
- 986±42
- Schmidt, David
- 2 6 6
- +7*
- 810±45
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 10 6 4
- −3*
- 986±42
- Schmidt, David
- 9 7 6
- +7*
- 810±45
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 9 −10 5 10
- −2*
- 1003±57
- Wallis, Heather
- 1 3 4
- +3
- 716±64
- Craig, Kate
- 4 −6 3 2
- −2*
- 1003±57
- Wallis, Heather
- 4 8 13
- +1*
- 601±72
- Nailon, Zak
- 4 3 0
- −2
- 1011±55
- Needham, Laurie
- −10 −9 7 8 4
- +1*
- 601±72
- Nailon, Zak
- 2 7 3
- +1*
- 588±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 1 6 6
- +1*
- 588±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 7 10 1
- 0
- 581±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 4 0 0
- Bloomfield, Michael
- Rating Change
908±66 − 1 = 907±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1133±66
- Smedley, Michael
- 8 −1 9 −5 4
- −4*
- 896±45
- Nailon, Jake
- 9 10 4
- +12
- 916±36
- Riedel, Anthony
- −8 8 7 −2 4
- −1*
- 896±55
- Crowe, Josh
- 9 5 9
- 0*
- 896±45
- Nailon, Jake
- 3 6 −9 7
- −14
- 918±40
- Mallinson, Seth
- −7 10 5 −8 4
- 0*
- 896±55
- Crowe, Josh
- 9 6 −9 8
- −6
- 1001±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 4 8 7
- −5
- 1002±40
- McGennisken, Jon
- 10 8 −8 4
- −4
- 1005±39
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- 10 7 6
- −3
- 1025±43
- Schmidt, Ben
- 8 4 9
- −1
- 1158±50
- Haugen, Peder
- 7 4 5
- Bugiera, James
- Rating Change
996±58 − 21 = 975±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1118±73
- Gilmore, Steve
- 7 7 −6 11
- −24
- 959±38
- Sorenson, Paul
- 12 3 9
- +13
- 1028±69
- Fenney, Allan
- −8 7 9 12
- −11*
- 1005±35
- Wade, Peter
- 5 8 8
- +7*
- 1026±35
- Mason, Shane
- −6 7 −9 8 9
- −11*
- 1005±35
- Wade, Peter
- 8 5 −9 −12 8
- +6*
- 1025±34
- Stephens, Owen
- 8 10 −10 8
- 0*
- 1012±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 7 7 −9 9
- +4*
- 1012±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 8 −11 11 5
- 0*
- 1025±34
- Stephens, Owen
- −8 15 6 −9 11
- 0*
- 1026±35
- Mason, Shane
- 6 −9 6 −7 6
- −7
- 1033±33
- Wade, Emma
- 4 3 5
- −6
- 1038±38
- Sierak, John
- 4 −5 −10 5 8
- −2*
- 1103±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 1 9 −4 −2 10
- −2*
- 1103±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 4 −9 −10 9 9
- −2*
- 1112±48
- Gott, Will
- 7 5 10
- −2*
- 1112±48
- Gott, Will
- 10 7 −8 15
- −1*
- 1133±48
- Gray, Andy
- −6 −8 3 6 5
- −1*
- 1133±48
- Gray, Andy
- −7 6 14 7
- Cavendish, Robin
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 84 = 916±114 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 585±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 8 9 6
- −92
- 999±55
- Wallis, Heather
- 6 5 4
- Cole-Sinclair, Hugh
- Rating Change
1121±101 − 36 = 1085±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 973±37
- Sorenson, Paul
- 8 −6 8 5
- −55
- 1102±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 5 2 5
- Craig, Hamish
- Rating Change
903±66 − 59 = 844±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 798±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- −9 −10 4 2 3
- −31
- 863±39
- Blaze, John
- 7 −11 7 −8 5
- +1*
- 597±71
- Nailon, Zak
- 9 5 5
- −17
- 902±40
- Johnson, Margaret
- 2 6 0
- +1*
- 597±71
- Nailon, Zak
- 8 8 −7 −10 9
- −13
- 906±41
- Matthews, Darren
- 5 9 7
- +1
- 585±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 3 3 9
- −5
- 985±42
- Schmidt, David
- 0 8 −9 7
- +1
- 580±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 1 4 5
- −4*
- 1000±56
- Needham, Laurie
- 3 7 6
- −4*
- 1000±56
- Needham, Laurie
- 3 10 2
- −3
- 1003±57
- Wallis, Heather
- 6 10 8
- Craig, James
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 162 = 838±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0*
- 869±39
- Blaze, John
- 8 4 −9 9
- −80*
- 869±39
- Blaze, John
- 7 12 8
- +23
- 795±43
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 10 6 −5 9
- −50
- 903±39
- Johnson, Margaret
- 5 −9 11 4
- +3
- 595±70
- Nailon, Zak
- 8 3 10
- −23*
- 903±40
- Matthews, Darren
- 6 7 −8 9
- +2
- 580±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 4 2 6
- −23*
- 903±40
- Matthews, Darren
- 7 1 4
- −7
- 984±41
- Schmidt, David
- 5 4 7
- −5
- 1003±55
- Needham, Laurie
- 4 6 2
- Craig, Kate
- Rating Change
800±150 − 89 = 711±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +37
- 601±71
- Nailon, Zak
- 8 −9 4 8
- −68*
- 781±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 1 8 4
- +20
- 589±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 3 7 10
- −68*
- 781±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 7 1 3
- +11*
- 587±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 3 5 7
- −12
- 870±39
- Blaze, John
- 4 −6 3 2
- +11*
- 587±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 6 2 −10 −6 11
- −6*
- 906±39
- Johnson, Margaret
- 1 5 4
- −6*
- 906±39
- Johnson, Margaret
- 1 2 5
- −4
- 912±40
- Matthews, Darren
- 4 5 2
- −1*
- 987±41
- Schmidt, David
- 2 9 7
- −1*
- 987±41
- Schmidt, David
- 1 4 3
- −1
- 1007±57
- Wallis, Heather
- 7 3 11
- −1
- 1011±55
- Needham, Laurie
- 2 2 8
- Crowe, Josh
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 92 = 908±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26*
- 1065±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 9 −6 6 −11 8
- −70*
- 885±44
- Bloomfield, Michael
- 9 6 −9 8
- +1*
- 923±39
- Mallinson, Seth
- 0 6 7
- −12*
- 904±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- −5 6 8 5
- 0*
- 904±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 6 10 −7 8
- 0*
- 923±39
- Mallinson, Seth
- 8 5 13
- 0*
- 885±44
- Bloomfield, Michael
- 9 5 9
- −12
- 999±37
- Hookey, Matthew
- 9 3 6
- −6*
- 1019±42
- Schmidt, Ben
- 6 6 4
- −6*
- 1019±42
- Schmidt, Ben
- 6 4 8
- −6*
- 1019±42
- Schmidt, Ben
- 5 −8 3 −7 6
- 0*
- 1065±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 6 5 6
- −3
- 1068±63
- Smedley, Michael
- 5 6 8
- −1*
- 1151±50
- Haugen, Peder
- 2 4 0
- −1*
- 1151±50
- Haugen, Peder
- 6 8 2
- −1*
- 1151±50
- Haugen, Peder
- 4 5 4
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- Rating Change
1010±61 + 2 = 1012±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24*
- 1188±57
- Haugen, Peder
- 4 −6 8 4
- −24*
- 898±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 7 5 8
- +20
- 1077±42
- Haugen, Erik
- 7 1 7
- −24
- 911±40
- Mallinson, Seth
- −9 8 −4 11 4
- +5*
- 1034±47
- Schmidt, Ben
- 5 5 −9 6
- −12
- 995±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 6 6 9
- +11
- 1017±41
- McGennisken, Jon
- 6 8 13
- 0*
- 1034±47
- Schmidt, Ben
- 6 6 5
- 0*
- 898±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 2 3 5
- −5
- 1064±63
- Smedley, Michael
- −5 −10 8 8 5
- +4
- 895±43
- Bloomfield, Michael
- 10 7 6
- 0*
- 1188±57
- Haugen, Peder
- −3 −8 9 8 7
- +3
- 868±43
- Miller, Craig
- −10 7 4 7
- Fenney, Allan
- Rating Change
1070±82 − 92 = 978±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −58
- 956±35
- Bugiera, James
- −8 7 9 12
- −34
- 966±36
- Turner, Alison
- 6 9 9
- Gilmore, Steve
- Rating Change
1000±150 + 54 = 1054±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +99
- 1043±33
- Wade, Emma
- −8 6 6 8
- −108
- 962±34
- Bugiera, James
- 7 7 −6 11
- +49
- 1029±34
- Mason, Shane
- −7 3 8 9
- −31
- 1013±34
- Wade, Peter
- 10 −9 −9 9 9
- +29
- 1015±32
- Kawecki, Max
- 10 −5 7 6
- +16
- 982±35
- Turner, Alison
- 6 11 −9 4
- Gott, Will
- Rating Change
1051±63 + 81 = 1132±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1166±53
- Gray, Andy
- 9 6 −11 −5 9
- −17
- 1104±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 6 −8 6 −4 4
- +16
- 1044±33
- Wade, Emma
- −2 8 −8 7 13
- +11
- 1030±34
- Mason, Shane
- 10 6 8
- +9
- 1023±34
- Wade, Peter
- 11 9 4
- +7
- 1016±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 8 6 −6 8
- +5*
- 986±35
- Turner, Alison
- 8 9 9
- +5*
- 986±35
- Turner, Alison
- 9 5 8
- +4
- 975±38
- Sorenson, Paul
- −9 4 9 −4 7
- +3*
- 974±34
- Bugiera, James
- 7 5 10
- +3*
- 974±34
- Bugiera, James
- 10 7 −8 15
- Graffen, Kade
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 194 = 806±98 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −148
- 865±39
- Blaze, John
- 7 6 6
- −45
- 907±40
- Matthews, Darren
- 7 5 9
- Graham, Rodney
- Rating Change
1034±42 + 81 = 1115±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1171±53
- Gray, Andy
- 14 −11 8 −8 10
- −3*
- 1008±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 8 9 −9 9
- +14
- 1157±66
- Gott, Will
- 6 −8 6 −4 4
- −9
- 1043±40
- Hast, Ben
- 5 7 −9 −9 4
- +10
- 1144±94
- Cole-Sinclair, Hugh
- 5 2 5
- +7*
- 1066±40
- Sierak, John
- 8 7 5
- +7*
- 1066±40
- Sierak, John
- 8 13 12
- +6*
- 1053±34
- Wade, Emma
- 9 7 −9 9
- +6*
- 1053±34
- Wade, Emma
- 4 −10 4 3
- +4*
- 1036±35
- Stephens, Owen
- 3 9 −8 7
- +4*
- 1036±35
- Stephens, Owen
- 5 6 3
- +4
- 1031±35
- Mason, Shane
- −7 10 4 8
- +3*
- 1031±35
- Wade, Peter
- 4 8 4
- +3*
- 1031±35
- Wade, Peter
- 2 7 0
- 0*
- 1008±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 7 10 −7 12
- +2*
- 988±36
- Turner, Alison
- 1 5 7
- +2*
- 988±36
- Turner, Alison
- 6 6 8
- +2*
- 976±35
- Bugiera, James
- 1 9 −4 −2 10
- +2*
- 976±35
- Bugiera, James
- 4 −9 −10 9 9
- Gray, Andy
- Rating Change
1000±150 + 135 = 1135±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +99
- 1051±38
- Sierak, John
- 8 10 10
- 0*
- 1039±33
- Wade, Emma
- 13 8 2
- +9*
- 1039±33
- Wade, Emma
- −14 12 10 10
- −57
- 1106±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 14 −11 8 −8 10
- +21*
- 1031±34
- Mason, Shane
- 8 −7 10 5
- −24
- 1116±47
- Gott, Will
- 9 6 −11 −5 9
- +21*
- 1031±34
- Mason, Shane
- −9 −6 10 10 6
- +14
- 1027±33
- Stephens, Owen
- 6 8 −9 9
- +10*
- 1024±34
- Wade, Peter
- 10 −6 2 8
- +10*
- 1024±34
- Wade, Peter
- 9 2 10
- +7*
- 1017±32
- Kawecki, Max
- 10 −9 7 −8 9
- +7*
- 1017±32
- Kawecki, Max
- 14 3 9
- +4*
- 984±35
- Turner, Alison
- −10 4 8 −6 9
- +4*
- 984±35
- Turner, Alison
- −10 6 −9 4 8
- +3
- 975±37
- Sorenson, Paul
- −2 8 −8 7 2
- +3*
- 973±34
- Bugiera, James
- −6 −8 3 6 5
- +3*
- 973±34
- Bugiera, James
- −7 6 14 7
- Hanton, Shirley
- Rating Change
908±68 − 46 = 862±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −32
- 842±67
- James, Adam
- 9 9 −7 6
- −7*
- 998±40
- McGennisken, Jon
- 10 8 −5 6
- −7*
- 998±40
- McGennisken, Jon
- 12 3 −6 5
- Hast, Ben
- Rating Change
1035±56 + 20 = 1055±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1119±37
- Graham, Rodney
- 5 7 −9 −9 4
- −22
- 1002±33
- Kawecki, Max
- −5 8 6 9
- +12*
- 1051±34
- Wade, Emma
- 6 7 10
- 0*
- 1016±35
- Wade, Peter
- 10 4 7
- +12*
- 1051±34
- Wade, Emma
- 2 7 −5 8
- −11
- 1035±38
- Sierak, John
- 6 −9 9 −8 7
- +9
- 1029±34
- Stephens, Owen
- −5 −5 6 5 7
- 0*
- 1016±35
- Wade, Peter
- 9 −9 4 −8 5
- Haugen, Ben
- Rating Change
555±100 − 2 = 553±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +45*
- 622±61
- McNee, Sarah
- −6 8 2 5
- −35*
- 544±88
- Nailon, Zak
- 2 −7 −8 7 11
- +45*
- 622±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 5 9 −5 5
- −35*
- 544±88
- Nailon, Zak
- 4 6 8
- −7*
- 690±68
- Craig, Kate
- 3 5 7
- −7*
- 690±68
- Craig, Kate
- 6 2 −10 −6 11
- −2*
- 790±43
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 4 2 6
- −2*
- 790±43
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 7 4 7
- −1
- 826±60
- Craig, James
- 4 2 6
- −1
- 840±45
- Craig, Hamish
- 1 4 5
- 0
- 874±38
- Blaze, John
- 4 0 0
- 0*
- 911±39
- Johnson, Margaret
- 3 2 4
- 0*
- 911±39
- Johnson, Margaret
- 4 3 5
- 0
- 916±40
- Matthews, Darren
- 4 2 0
- 0*
- 1011±58
- Wallis, Heather
- 1 5 5
- 0*
- 1011±58
- Wallis, Heather
- 0 4 2
- 0*
- 1015±55
- Needham, Laurie
- −11 −9 9 8 9
- 0*
- 1015±55
- Needham, Laurie
- 2 1 3
- Haugen, Erik
- Rating Change
1177±82 − 133 = 1044±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19*
- 1158±54
- Haugen, Peder
- −7 5 8 9
- −69*
- 855±39
- Nailon, Jake
- 5 4 2
- +12*
- 1037±45
- Schmidt, Ben
- 4 −7 8 5
- −69*
- 855±39
- Nailon, Jake
- 9 −7 7 −7 9
- +12*
- 1037±45
- Schmidt, Ben
- 9 9 7
- −35*
- 865±53
- Crowe, Josh
- 9 −6 6 −11 8
- +9*
- 1011±40
- McGennisken, Jon
- 9 4 4
- −16
- 992±38
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- 7 1 7
- +9*
- 1011±40
- McGennisken, Jon
- 10 −9 9 −3 8
- −3*
- 992±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 9 10 −15 −5 5
- 0*
- 992±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 9 8 8
- −8*
- 1025±51
- Smedley, Michael
- −16 9 11 4
- +4*
- 928±39
- Mallinson, Seth
- 8 7 8
- −8*
- 1025±51
- Smedley, Michael
- 8 10 −8 7
- +4*
- 928±39
- Mallinson, Seth
- 9 3 3
- 0*
- 1158±54
- Haugen, Peder
- 5 6 −7 −7 10
- +3*
- 909±36
- Riedel, Anthony
- 14 7 5
- +3*
- 909±36
- Riedel, Anthony
- 6 6 6
- +2
- 876±60
- James, Adam
- 10 8 3
- 0*
- 865±53
- Crowe, Josh
- 6 5 6
- Haugen, Peder
- Rating Change
1220±89 − 89 = 1131±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1090±67
- Smedley, Michael
- 5 9 2
- −86*
- 890±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- −5 8 8 −6 7
- 0*
- 1049±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 5 6 −7 −7 10
- −37*
- 994±39
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- 4 −6 8 4
- +7
- 1008±40
- McGennisken, Jon
- 6 10 8
- −11*
- 1049±41
- Haugen, Erik
- −7 5 8 9
- +6*
- 1007±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 4 6 8
- +6*
- 1007±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- −3 5 8 4
- 0*
- 994±39
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- −3 −8 9 8 7
- +2*
- 928±39
- Mallinson, Seth
- 2 8 9
- +2*
- 928±39
- Mallinson, Seth
- 9 9 5
- +1*
- 900±50
- Crowe, Josh
- 2 4 0
- +1*
- 900±50
- Crowe, Josh
- 6 8 2
- +1*
- 900±50
- Crowe, Josh
- 4 5 4
- +1
- 897±42
- Nailon, Jake
- 6 7 8
- +1
- 891±42
- Bloomfield, Michael
- 7 4 5
- 0*
- 890±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 6 2 2
- Hookey, Matthew
- Rating Change
1002±60 − 7 = 995±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14*
- 1070±43
- Haugen, Erik
- 9 10 −15 −5 5
- −24*
- 884±43
- Nailon, Jake
- 6 3 −3 5
- +14
- 1019±39
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- 6 6 9
- −11*
- 918±41
- Mallinson, Seth
- 4 2 8
- 0*
- 918±41
- Mallinson, Seth
- 8 9 11
- −11
- 997±40
- McGennisken, Jon
- 6 7 −10 −6 11
- +6*
- 915±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 7 6 −7 6
- −7*
- 1012±43
- Schmidt, Ben
- −8 −9 4 8 8
- +6*
- 915±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 10 3 8
- −7*
- 1012±43
- Schmidt, Ben
- −7 6 −5 8 8
- +5
- 906±51
- Crowe, Josh
- 9 3 6
- 0*
- 1070±43
- Haugen, Erik
- 9 8 8
- +4
- 896±43
- Bloomfield, Michael
- 4 8 7
- −1*
- 1152±51
- Haugen, Peder
- 4 6 8
- +3*
- 892±64
- James, Adam
- 3 9 9
- −1*
- 1152±51
- Haugen, Peder
- −3 5 8 4
- +3*
- 892±64
- James, Adam
- 5 4 11
- 0*
- 884±43
- Nailon, Jake
- 6 4 5
- +2
- 869±43
- Miller, Craig
- 10 5 −11 10
- James, Adam
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 113 = 887±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +58
- 897±61
- Hanton, Shirley
- 9 9 −7 6
- −130
- 907±40
- Matthews, Darren
- −6 4 10 7
- +31
- 878±39
- Blaze, John
- 6 8 11
- −23*
- 997±37
- Hookey, Matthew
- 3 9 9
- +2
- 595±70
- Nailon, Zak
- 7 8 1
- −23*
- 997±37
- Hookey, Matthew
- 5 4 11
- −13
- 1003±55
- Needham, Laurie
- −5 2 2 4
- −5
- 1057±40
- Haugen, Erik
- 10 8 3
- −4*
- 1063±62
- Smedley, Michael
- 8 −10 3 7
- −4*
- 1063±62
- Smedley, Michael
- 11 2 9
- Johnson, Margaret
- Rating Change
903±58 + 13 = 916±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19*
- 1004±46
- Schmidt, David
- 8 6 8
- −19
- 906±41
- Matthews, Darren
- −2 7 9 5
- +12
- 883±40
- Blaze, John
- 9 4 9
- −6*
- 996±56
- Wallis, Heather
- 2 −10 6 −9 11
- +8
- 850±46
- Craig, Hamish
- 2 6 0
- −6*
- 996±56
- Wallis, Heather
- 10 −8 8 6
- +6
- 844±63
- Craig, James
- 5 −9 11 4
- 0*
- 1004±46
- Schmidt, David
- 9 10 8
- +2*
- 715±65
- Craig, Kate
- 1 5 4
- −5
- 1007±56
- Needham, Laurie
- 11 7 9
- +2*
- 715±65
- Craig, Kate
- 1 2 5
- 0
- 596±71
- Nailon, Zak
- 2 2 3
- 0*
- 586±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 4 7 7
- 0*
- 586±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 3 3 3
- 0*
- 581±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 3 2 4
- 0*
- 581±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 4 3 5
- Kawecki, Max
- Rating Change
1004±57 + 6 = 1010±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17*
- 1117±36
- Graham, Rodney
- 8 9 −9 9
- −9*
- 964±35
- Bugiera, James
- 8 −11 11 5
- +15
- 1068±42
- Hast, Ben
- −5 8 6 9
- −12*
- 1004±35
- Wade, Peter
- 8 12 8
- +13
- 1056±38
- Sierak, John
- 7 8 −3 11
- −12*
- 1004±35
- Wade, Peter
- −9 9 5 −9 6
- +3*
- 1024±35
- Stephens, Owen
- 2 9 11
- 0*
- 1024±35
- Stephens, Owen
- −1 5 7 8
- +7
- 984±35
- Turner, Alison
- 6 6 7
- −7*
- 1027±34
- Wade, Emma
- 3 6 −7 6
- +5*
- 984±38
- Sorenson, Paul
- −9 6 6 −8 5
- −7*
- 1027±34
- Wade, Emma
- 6 9 8
- +5*
- 984±38
- Sorenson, Paul
- 6 6 −11 −3 5
- −5
- 1054±67
- Gilmore, Steve
- 10 −5 7 6
- 0*
- 964±35
- Bugiera, James
- 7 7 −9 9
- −2
- 1116±48
- Gott, Will
- 8 6 −6 8
- 0*
- 1117±36
- Graham, Rodney
- 7 10 −7 12
- −2*
- 1133±48
- Gray, Andy
- 10 −9 7 −8 9
- −2*
- 1133±48
- Gray, Andy
- 14 3 9
- Lilley, Zac
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 193 = 807±86 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 595±70
- Nailon, Zak
- 6 5 −8 7
- −148
- 865±39
- Blaze, John
- 8 11 2
- −45
- 907±40
- Matthews, Darren
- 5 2 6
- −11
- 1003±55
- Needham, Laurie
- 11 6 2
- Mallinson, Seth
- Rating Change
903±66 + 28 = 931±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1024±39
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- −9 8 −4 11 4
- −32
- 850±44
- Miller, Craig
- 6 −8 3 −8 5
- +17*
- 1018±41
- McGennisken, Jon
- 9 13 3
- 0*
- 897±55
- Crowe, Josh
- 0 6 7
- +13*
- 1015±39
- Hookey, Matthew
- 4 2 8
- 0*
- 1015±39
- Hookey, Matthew
- 8 9 11
- +9
- 909±46
- Nailon, Jake
- 3 9 10
- 0*
- 1018±41
- McGennisken, Jon
- 9 9 −7 6
- +8
- 902±44
- Bloomfield, Michael
- −7 10 5 −8 4
- −5*
- 1022±43
- Schmidt, Ben
- 5 5 6
- +5*
- 897±55
- Crowe, Josh
- 8 5 13
- −5*
- 1022±43
- Schmidt, Ben
- 10 1 4
- −3*
- 1057±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 8 7 8
- −3*
- 1057±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 9 3 3
- −2*
- 1069±64
- Smedley, Michael
- −9 −6 6 6 5
- −2*
- 1069±64
- Smedley, Michael
- 6 2 6
- −1*
- 1157±51
- Haugen, Peder
- 2 8 9
- −1*
- 1157±51
- Haugen, Peder
- 9 9 5
- Mason, Shane
- Rating Change
1068±57 − 50 = 1018±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1052±38
- Sierak, John
- −7 6 −4 6 11
- −22*
- 959±35
- Bugiera, James
- −6 7 −9 8 9
- +2*
- 1035±34
- Wade, Emma
- −4 9 6 9
- −23
- 965±36
- Turner, Alison
- −8 9 −9 9 9
- 0*
- 1018±34
- Stephens, Owen
- 15 −6 6 11
- −2*
- 1013±35
- Wade, Peter
- −8 9 8 8
- 0*
- 1013±35
- Wade, Peter
- 9 −5 12 8
- −1*
- 1018±34
- Stephens, Owen
- 5 6 −8 −9 5
- +5
- 974±38
- Sorenson, Paul
- −3 8 8 4
- 0*
- 1035±34
- Wade, Emma
- 7 9 3
- 0*
- 959±35
- Bugiera, James
- 6 −9 6 −7 6
- −7
- 1043±67
- Gilmore, Steve
- −7 3 8 9
- −4
- 1103±31
- Graham, Rodney
- −7 10 4 8
- −4
- 1112±47
- Gott, Will
- 10 6 8
- −3*
- 1125±48
- Gray, Andy
- 8 −7 10 5
- −3*
- 1125±48
- Gray, Andy
- −9 −6 10 10 6
- Matthews, Darren
- Rating Change
872±66 + 38 = 910±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 924±40
- Johnson, Margaret
- −2 7 9 5
- −22*
- 782±46
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 8 8 8
- +16
- 899±63
- James, Adam
- −6 4 10 7
- −6*
- 983±42
- Schmidt, David
- 3 6 4
- +9*
- 865±66
- Craig, James
- 6 7 −8 9
- −6*
- 983±42
- Schmidt, David
- 6 3 4
- +9*
- 865±66
- Craig, James
- 7 1 4
- −4*
- 1000±57
- Wallis, Heather
- 7 −9 −5 5 5
- +8
- 861±98
- Lilley, Zac
- 5 2 6
- −4*
- 1000±57
- Wallis, Heather
- −6 9 8 −6 6
- +8
- 852±46
- Craig, Hamish
- 5 9 7
- −3
- 1009±55
- Needham, Laurie
- 7 3 −7 7
- +6
- 846±115
- Graffen, Kade
- 7 5 9
- 0*
- 782±46
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 4 10 −9 −9 4
- +2
- 713±64
- Craig, Kate
- 4 5 2
- 0*
- 599±71
- Nailon, Zak
- 5 1 7
- 0*
- 599±71
- Nailon, Zak
- 7 4 6
- 0*
- 587±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 8 6 3
- 0*
- 587±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 2 3 5
- 0
- 581±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 4 2 0
- McGennisken, Jon
- Rating Change
1094±79 − 81 = 1013±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10*
- 1080±69
- Smedley, Michael
- −6 6 −9 9 8
- −57*
- 894±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- −4 9 5 8
- +6*
- 1023±44
- Schmidt, Ben
- 11 −6 8 11
- −30*
- 912±40
- Mallinson, Seth
- 9 13 3
- +12
- 1010±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 6 7 −10 −6 11
- −20
- 996±39
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- 6 8 13
- 0*
- 912±40
- Mallinson, Seth
- 9 9 −7 6
- 0*
- 1023±44
- Schmidt, Ben
- 8 6 −11 −11 9
- +4*
- 901±44
- Nailon, Jake
- −5 8 −9 7 14
- −8*
- 1042±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 9 4 4
- +4*
- 901±44
- Nailon, Jake
- 9 −7 −6 6 8
- −8*
- 1042±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 10 −9 9 −3 8
- +3*
- 896±63
- Hanton, Shirley
- 10 8 −5 6
- 0*
- 1080±69
- Smedley, Michael
- −7 −8 9 7 7
- +3*
- 896±63
- Hanton, Shirley
- 12 3 −6 5
- −2
- 1150±51
- Haugen, Peder
- 6 10 8
- 0*
- 894±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 6 9 6
- +3
- 892±43
- Bloomfield, Michael
- 10 8 −8 4
- McNee, Sarah
- Rating Change
629±87 − 54 = 575±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31*
- 636±72
- Nailon, Zak
- 2 10 −5 −7 5
- −46*
- 504±88
- Haugen, Ben
- −6 8 2 5
- +31*
- 636±72
- Nailon, Zak
- 7 9 −11 6
- −46*
- 504±88
- Haugen, Ben
- 5 9 −5 5
- −11
- 690±68
- Craig, Kate
- 3 7 10
- −3*
- 787±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 1 3 6
- −3*
- 787±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 2 1 8
- −1
- 838±45
- Craig, Hamish
- 3 3 9
- −1*
- 873±39
- Blaze, John
- 1 6 6
- −1*
- 873±39
- Blaze, John
- 7 10 1
- −2
- 874±116
- Cavendish, Robin
- 8 9 6
- −2
- 874±116
- Swift, Connor
- 6 5 6
- 0*
- 910±39
- Johnson, Margaret
- 4 7 7
- 0*
- 910±39
- Johnson, Margaret
- 3 3 3
- 0*
- 915±40
- Matthews, Darren
- 8 6 3
- 0*
- 915±40
- Matthews, Darren
- 2 3 5
- 0*
- 991±41
- Schmidt, David
- 1 4 2
- 0*
- 991±41
- Schmidt, David
- 2 1 3
- 0*
- 1014±55
- Needham, Laurie
- 3 8 0
- 0*
- 1014±55
- Needham, Laurie
- 0 3 1
- Miller, Craig
- Rating Change
927±58 − 48 = 879±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 937±40
- Mallinson, Seth
- 6 −8 3 −8 5
- −21*
- 871±42
- Nailon, Jake
- 7 6 −2 6
- −21*
- 871±42
- Nailon, Jake
- 9 8 −7 8
- −14
- 897±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 10 6 −10 3
- −5
- 1000±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 10 5 −11 10
- −4
- 1004±39
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- −10 7 4 7
- −2
- 1073±64
- Smedley, Michael
- 6 2 3
- Nailon, Jake
- Rating Change
794±62 + 116 = 910±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39*
- 1100±43
- Haugen, Erik
- 5 4 2
- 0*
- 903±44
- Bloomfield, Michael
- 3 6 −9 7
- +39*
- 1100±43
- Haugen, Erik
- 9 −7 7 −7 9
- 0*
- 918±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 8 −9 8 4
- +28*
- 1022±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 6 3 −3 5
- −9
- 923±39
- Mallinson, Seth
- 3 9 10
- +5*
- 918±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- −9 8 9 11
- −2*
- 1004±40
- McGennisken, Jon
- −5 8 −9 7 14
- +1*
- 903±44
- Bloomfield, Michael
- 9 10 4
- −2*
- 1004±40
- McGennisken, Jon
- 9 −7 −6 6 8
- +11*
- 895±44
- Miller, Craig
- 7 6 −2 6
- 0*
- 1022±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 6 4 5
- +11*
- 895±44
- Miller, Craig
- 9 8 −7 8
- −2
- 1028±42
- Schmidt, Ben
- 8 8 8
- −1*
- 1077±64
- Smedley, Michael
- −6 2 −10 3 7
- −1*
- 1077±64
- Smedley, Michael
- 10 6 6
- 0
- 1159±50
- Haugen, Peder
- 6 7 8
- Nailon, Zak
- Rating Change
800±150 − 228 = 572±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +37*
- 587±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 2 −7 −8 7 11
- −129*
- 530±73
- McNee, Sarah
- 2 10 −5 −7 5
- +37*
- 587±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 4 6 8
- −129*
- 530±73
- McNee, Sarah
- 7 9 −11 6
- −20
- 680±67
- Craig, Kate
- 8 −9 4 8
- −6
- 780±97
- Lilley, Zac
- 6 5 −8 7
- −4
- 784±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 4 8 6
- −3
- 814±62
- Craig, James
- 8 3 10
- −2*
- 830±46
- Craig, Hamish
- 9 5 5
- −2*
- 830±46
- Craig, Hamish
- 8 8 −7 −10 9
- −1
- 862±62
- James, Adam
- 7 8 1
- −1*
- 868±39
- Blaze, John
- 4 3 0
- −1*
- 868±39
- Blaze, John
- 2 7 3
- 0
- 908±39
- Johnson, Margaret
- 2 2 3
- 0*
- 910±40
- Matthews, Darren
- 5 1 7
- 0*
- 910±40
- Matthews, Darren
- 7 4 6
- 0*
- 987±41
- Schmidt, David
- 4 3 11
- 0*
- 987±41
- Schmidt, David
- 4 10 6
- 0*
- 1005±57
- Wallis, Heather
- 3 3 7
- 0*
- 1005±57
- Wallis, Heather
- 3 7 7
- Needham, Laurie
- Rating Change
1000±150 + 15 = 1015±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +37*
- 1015±63
- Wallis, Heather
- −4 −10 4 12 9
- −185
- 777±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 9 14 9
- +81*
- 991±43
- Schmidt, David
- 6 12 −8 −11 6
- 0*
- 991±43
- Schmidt, David
- 3 5 4
- +26
- 921±41
- Matthews, Darren
- 7 3 −7 7
- 0*
- 1015±63
- Wallis, Heather
- 8 5 8
- +18
- 916±39
- Johnson, Margaret
- 11 7 9
- +10
- 883±61
- James, Adam
- −5 2 2 4
- +8
- 878±39
- Blaze, John
- −10 −9 7 8 4
- +5*
- 846±46
- Craig, Hamish
- 3 7 6
- +5*
- 846±46
- Craig, Hamish
- 3 10 2
- +4
- 835±60
- Craig, James
- 4 6 2
- +4
- 831±90
- Lilley, Zac
- 11 6 2
- +1
- 709±63
- Craig, Kate
- 2 2 8
- 0*
- 586±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 3 8 0
- 0*
- 586±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 0 3 1
- 0*
- 581±65
- Haugen, Ben
- −11 −9 9 8 9
- 0*
- 581±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 2 1 3
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- Rating Change
755±72 + 51 = 806±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +45
- 1060±62
- Needham, Laurie
- 9 14 9
- −19
- 813±63
- Craig, James
- 10 6 −5 9
- +28*
- 932±43
- Matthews, Darren
- 8 8 8
- −12
- 833±46
- Craig, Hamish
- −9 −10 4 2 3
- +8*
- 740±66
- Craig, Kate
- 1 8 4
- −6*
- 868±39
- Blaze, John
- 10 6 4
- +8*
- 740±66
- Craig, Kate
- 7 1 3
- −6*
- 868±39
- Blaze, John
- 9 −10 5 10
- +2
- 603±72
- Nailon, Zak
- 4 8 6
- 0*
- 932±43
- Matthews, Darren
- 4 10 −9 −9 4
- +2*
- 595±62
- McNee, Sarah
- 1 3 6
- −1*
- 989±42
- Schmidt, David
- 9 4 7
- +2*
- 595±62
- McNee, Sarah
- 2 1 8
- −1*
- 989±42
- Schmidt, David
- 2 −7 8 −7 6
- +2*
- 591±67
- Haugen, Ben
- 4 2 6
- −1*
- 1008±58
- Wallis, Heather
- 6 10 3
- +2*
- 591±67
- Haugen, Ben
- 7 4 7
- −1*
- 1008±58
- Wallis, Heather
- −8 2 7 8
- Riedel, Anthony
- Rating Change
900±60 + 15 = 915±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22*
- 1196±56
- Haugen, Peder
- −5 8 8 −6 7
- −23
- 877±44
- Bloomfield, Michael
- −8 8 7 −2 4
- +13*
- 1021±40
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- 7 5 8
- 0*
- 897±46
- Nailon, Jake
- −9 8 9 11
- +11*
- 1019±41
- McGennisken, Jon
- −4 9 5 8
- 0*
- 898±55
- Crowe, Josh
- 6 10 −7 8
- +3*
- 898±55
- Crowe, Josh
- −5 6 8 5
- −4*
- 997±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 7 6 −7 6
- +3*
- 897±46
- Nailon, Jake
- 8 −9 8 4
- −4*
- 997±38
- Hookey, Matthew
- 10 3 8
- +6
- 875±44
- Miller, Craig
- 10 6 −10 3
- 0*
- 1019±41
- McGennisken, Jon
- 6 9 6
- 0*
- 1021±40
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- 2 3 5
- −3*
- 1022±43
- Schmidt, Ben
- 5 −8 5 −11 10
- −3*
- 1022±43
- Schmidt, Ben
- 9 4 9
- −2*
- 1057±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 14 7 5
- −2*
- 1057±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 6 6 6
- −1*
- 1070±64
- Smedley, Michael
- 9 9 −9 7
- −1*
- 1070±64
- Smedley, Michael
- −5 5 8 −8 3
- 0*
- 1196±56
- Haugen, Peder
- 6 2 2
- Schmidt, Ben
- Rating Change
971±66 + 59 = 1030±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22*
- 1024±39
- Hookey, Matthew
- −8 −9 4 8 8
- 0*
- 1011±41
- McGennisken, Jon
- 11 −6 8 11
- +22*
- 1024±39
- Hookey, Matthew
- −7 6 −5 8 8
- 0*
- 1014±40
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- 5 5 −9 6
- +4*
- 1014±40
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- 6 6 5
- −12*
- 1053±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 4 −7 8 5
- +3*
- 1011±41
- McGennisken, Jon
- 8 6 −11 −11 9
- −12*
- 1053±41
- Haugen, Erik
- 9 9 7
- +6*
- 940±40
- Mallinson, Seth
- 5 5 6
- −7
- 1069±64
- Smedley, Michael
- −6 −7 6 9 10
- +6*
- 940±40
- Mallinson, Seth
- 10 1 4
- +4*
- 924±53
- Crowe, Josh
- 6 6 4
- +4*
- 924±53
- Crowe, Josh
- 6 4 8
- +4*
- 924±53
- Crowe, Josh
- 5 −8 3 −7 6
- +4*
- 917±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 5 −8 5 −11 10
- +4*
- 917±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 9 4 9
- +3
- 904±45
- Nailon, Jake
- 8 8 8
- +3
- 897±43
- Bloomfield, Michael
- 8 4 9
- Schmidt, David
- Rating Change
960±62 + 44 = 1004±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11*
- 1035±73
- Wallis, Heather
- −8 9 −10 6 4
- −13*
- 906±41
- Johnson, Margaret
- 8 6 8
- +9*
- 1031±63
- Needham, Laurie
- 3 5 4
- 0*
- 1031±63
- Needham, Laurie
- 6 12 −8 −11 6
- +9*
- 932±44
- Matthews, Darren
- 3 6 4
- 0*
- 1035±73
- Wallis, Heather
- 6 10 −8 7
- +9*
- 932±44
- Matthews, Darren
- 6 3 4
- 0*
- 906±41
- Johnson, Margaret
- 9 10 8
- +5*
- 885±41
- Blaze, John
- 2 6 6
- +5*
- 885±41
- Blaze, John
- 9 7 6
- +3
- 846±46
- Craig, Hamish
- 0 8 −9 7
- +3
- 838±62
- Craig, James
- 5 4 7
- +1*
- 798±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 9 4 7
- +1*
- 798±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 2 −7 8 −7 6
- 0*
- 711±63
- Craig, Kate
- 2 9 7
- 0*
- 711±63
- Craig, Kate
- 1 4 3
- 0*
- 595±71
- Nailon, Zak
- 4 3 11
- 0*
- 595±71
- Nailon, Zak
- 4 10 6
- 0*
- 585±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 1 4 2
- 0*
- 585±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 2 1 3
- Sierak, John
- Rating Change
1129±63 − 88 = 1041±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1059±41
- Hast, Ben
- 6 −9 9 −8 7
- −39
- 999±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 7 8 −3 11
- +7
- 980±35
- Turner, Alison
- 9 8 3
- −28
- 1005±34
- Wade, Peter
- 6 6 8
- +6
- 972±37
- Sorenson, Paul
- −4 2 6 9
- −21
- 1011±34
- Mason, Shane
- −7 6 −4 6 11
- +5
- 969±34
- Bugiera, James
- 4 −5 −10 5 8
- −16
- 1027±33
- Wade, Emma
- −7 6 4 11
- −7*
- 1096±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 8 7 5
- −7*
- 1096±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 8 13 12
- −4
- 1128±47
- Gray, Andy
- 8 10 10
- Smedley, Michael
- Rating Change
937±57 + 121 = 1058±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29*
- 1095±43
- Haugen, Erik
- −16 9 11 4
- −25
- 874±44
- Bloomfield, Michael
- 8 −1 9 −5 4
- +29*
- 1095±43
- Haugen, Erik
- 8 10 −8 7
- −2*
- 1015±42
- McGennisken, Jon
- −6 6 −9 9 8
- +23
- 1051±48
- Schmidt, Ben
- −6 −7 6 9 10
- −1
- 1158±51
- Haugen, Peder
- 5 9 2
- +20
- 1023±39
- Debrodt, Jurgen
- −5 −10 8 8 5
- 0*
- 1015±42
- McGennisken, Jon
- −7 −8 9 7 7
- +7*
- 944±40
- Mallinson, Seth
- −9 −6 6 6 5
- +7*
- 944±40
- Mallinson, Seth
- 6 2 6
- +5*
- 921±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- 9 9 −9 7
- +5*
- 921±37
- Riedel, Anthony
- −5 5 8 −8 3
- +5*
- 917±50
- Nailon, Jake
- −6 2 −10 3 7
- +5*
- 917±50
- Nailon, Jake
- 10 6 6
- +5
- 912±51
- Crowe, Josh
- 5 6 8
- +4*
- 908±66
- James, Adam
- 8 −10 3 7
- +4*
- 908±66
- James, Adam
- 11 2 9
- +3
- 872±44
- Miller, Craig
- 6 2 3
- Sorenson, Paul
- Rating Change
1000±59 − 38 = 962±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1047±33
- Wade, Emma
- 4 4 8
- −17*
- 998±33
- Kawecki, Max
- −9 6 6 −8 5
- +12
- 984±35
- Turner, Alison
- −8 6 −9 7 2
- −17*
- 998±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 6 6 −11 −3 5
- +10
- 973±34
- Bugiera, James
- 12 3 9
- −11
- 1010±34
- Wade, Peter
- −7 7 12 4
- −8*
- 1011±34
- Stephens, Owen
- −6 6 −9 4 5
- −8*
- 1011±34
- Stephens, Owen
- −8 3 3 −9 8
- −7
- 1017±35
- Mason, Shane
- −3 8 8 4
- −5
- 1037±38
- Sierak, John
- −4 2 6 9
- −4
- 1049±82
- Cole-Sinclair, Hugh
- 8 −6 8 5
- −2
- 1116±48
- Gott, Will
- −9 4 9 −4 7
- −1
- 1137±48
- Gray, Andy
- −2 8 −8 7 2
- Stephens, Owen
- Rating Change
1032±67 − 10 = 1022±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11*
- 1029±34
- Wade, Peter
- −10 7 7 −8 9
- −19*
- 962±35
- Bugiera, James
- 8 10 −10 8
- +11*
- 1029±34
- Wade, Peter
- 4 12 11
- −1*
- 1009±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 2 9 11
- +2*
- 1023±35
- Mason, Shane
- 5 6 −8 −9 5
- 0*
- 1023±35
- Mason, Shane
- 15 −6 6 11
- 0*
- 1009±33
- Kawecki, Max
- −1 5 7 8
- −10*
- 1026±34
- Wade, Emma
- −5 7 −8 5 8
- +6*
- 987±35
- Turner, Alison
- 3 3 −4 −10 7
- −10*
- 1026±34
- Wade, Emma
- 8 5 −11 −8 5
- +6*
- 987±35
- Turner, Alison
- 3 −3 8 12
- −7
- 1044±40
- Hast, Ben
- −5 −5 6 5 7
- +5*
- 981±38
- Sorenson, Paul
- −6 6 −9 4 5
- −3*
- 1102±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 3 9 −8 7
- +5*
- 981±38
- Sorenson, Paul
- −8 3 3 −9 8
- −3*
- 1102±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 5 6 3
- 0*
- 962±35
- Bugiera, James
- −8 15 6 −9 11
- −2
- 1135±48
- Gray, Andy
- 6 8 −9 9
- Swift, Connor
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 84 = 916±114 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 585±61
- McNee, Sarah
- 6 5 6
- −92
- 999±55
- Wallis, Heather
- 9 2 4
- Turner, Alison
- Rating Change
1026±57 − 45 = 981±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1031±35
- Mason, Shane
- −8 9 −9 9 9
- −27
- 957±38
- Sorenson, Paul
- −8 6 −9 7 2
- +12*
- 1030±35
- Wade, Peter
- 7 −11 9 8
- −16
- 1003±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 6 6 7
- +12*
- 1030±35
- Wade, Peter
- 6 9 9
- −11*
- 1008±34
- Stephens, Owen
- 3 3 −4 −10 7
- +9
- 1023±69
- Fenney, Allan
- 6 9 9
- −11*
- 1008±34
- Stephens, Owen
- 3 −3 8 12
- −7
- 1031±33
- Wade, Emma
- 5 6 5
- −6
- 1036±38
- Sierak, John
- 9 8 3
- −5
- 1050±67
- Gilmore, Steve
- 6 11 −9 4
- −2*
- 1102±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 1 5 7
- −2*
- 1102±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 6 6 8
- −2*
- 1109±48
- Gott, Will
- 8 9 9
- −2*
- 1109±48
- Gott, Will
- 9 5 8
- −1*
- 1130±48
- Gray, Andy
- −10 4 8 −6 9
- −1*
- 1130±48
- Gray, Andy
- −10 6 −9 4 8
- Wade, Emma
- Rating Change
1048±60 − 2 = 1046±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16*
- 1159±53
- Gray, Andy
- 13 8 2
- −30
- 956±38
- Sorenson, Paul
- 4 4 8
- +13
- 1054±38
- Sierak, John
- −7 6 4 11
- 0*
- 1022±35
- Mason, Shane
- −4 9 6 9
- +9*
- 1034±34
- Stephens, Owen
- −5 7 −8 5 8
- −10*
- 1034±41
- Hast, Ben
- 6 7 10
- +9*
- 1034±34
- Stephens, Owen
- 8 5 −11 −8 5
- −10*
- 1034±41
- Hast, Ben
- 2 7 −5 8
- +1*
- 1022±35
- Mason, Shane
- 7 9 3
- −8
- 1047±67
- Gilmore, Steve
- −8 6 6 8
- +7*
- 1020±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 3 6 −7 6
- −4*
- 1101±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 9 7 −9 9
- +7*
- 1020±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 6 9 8
- −4*
- 1101±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 4 −10 4 3
- +4
- 982±35
- Turner, Alison
- 5 6 5
- −3
- 1113±47
- Gott, Will
- −2 8 −8 7 13
- +4
- 971±34
- Bugiera, James
- 4 3 5
- 0*
- 1159±53
- Gray, Andy
- −14 12 10 10
- Wade, Peter
- Rating Change
1009±66 + 11 = 1020±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1114±73
- Gilmore, Steve
- 10 −9 −9 9 9
- −26*
- 960±37
- Turner, Alison
- 7 −11 9 8
- +15*
- 1059±42
- Hast, Ben
- 10 4 7
- −26*
- 960±37
- Turner, Alison
- 6 9 9
- +17
- 1055±38
- Sierak, John
- 6 6 8
- −11*
- 1011±34
- Stephens, Owen
- −10 7 7 −8 9
- +6*
- 1025±35
- Mason, Shane
- −8 9 8 8
- −11*
- 1011±34
- Stephens, Owen
- 4 12 11
- +10*
- 1022±33
- Kawecki, Max
- 8 12 8
- 0*
- 1025±35
- Mason, Shane
- 9 −5 12 8
- +10*
- 1022±33
- Kawecki, Max
- −9 9 5 −9 6
- 0*
- 1059±42
- Hast, Ben
- 9 −9 4 −8 5
- +6*
- 977±34
- Bugiera, James
- 5 8 8
- −3*
- 1103±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 4 8 4
- +6*
- 977±34
- Bugiera, James
- 8 5 −9 −12 8
- −3*
- 1103±31
- Graham, Rodney
- 2 7 0
- +5
- 977±38
- Sorenson, Paul
- −7 7 12 4
- −3
- 1115±48
- Gott, Will
- 11 9 4
- −2*
- 1132±48
- Gray, Andy
- 10 −6 2 8
- −2*
- 1132±48
- Gray, Andy
- 9 2 10
- Wallis, Heather
- Rating Change
908±59 + 126 = 1034±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23*
- 1043±63
- Needham, Laurie
- 8 5 8
- 0*
- 1004±46
- Schmidt, David
- −8 9 −10 6 4
- +18
- 1009±144
- Cavendish, Robin
- 6 5 4
- 0*
- 1043±63
- Needham, Laurie
- −4 −10 4 12 9
- +17
- 1009±144
- Swift, Connor
- 9 2 4
- +4*
- 1004±46
- Schmidt, David
- 6 10 −8 7
- +12*
- 939±45
- Matthews, Darren
- 7 −9 −5 5 5
- +12*
- 939±45
- Matthews, Darren
- −6 9 8 −6 6
- +10*
- 932±42
- Johnson, Margaret
- 2 −10 6 −9 11
- +10*
- 932±42
- Johnson, Margaret
- 10 −8 8 6
- +6*
- 890±42
- Blaze, John
- 1 3 4
- +6*
- 890±42
- Blaze, John
- 4 8 13
- +4
- 849±46
- Craig, Hamish
- 6 10 8
- +2*
- 802±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- 6 10 3
- +2*
- 802±44
- O’Sullivan, Olivia
- −8 2 7 8
- +1
- 711±63
- Craig, Kate
- 7 3 11
- 0*
- 597±71
- Nailon, Zak
- 3 3 7
- 0*
- 597±71
- Nailon, Zak
- 3 7 7
- 0*
- 581±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 1 5 5
- 0*
- 581±65
- Haugen, Ben
- 0 4 2
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 48. Matches: 339. Club: Mornington Peninsula and Frankston City TTA. Province: VIC. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Cathcart, Peter. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 18836. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-01 3:46 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-04-18 11:29 pm EDT.