2016 CDTTA Pennant 0106
2016-06-01
Detailed Report
- Atalla, Maged
- Rating Change
1083±41 − 15 = 1068±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 1025±32
- Russo, Vince
- −9 8 6 8 11
- Balsillie, David
- Rating Change
1126±53 − 15 = 1111±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 940±52
- Lin, Van Lian
- 9 7 −11 4 4
- −17
- 1124±41
- Noble, Brian
- 7 10 8 13
- Blake, Kieren
- Rating Change
844±104 − 11 = 833±101 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1060±59
- Powell, Lucy
- −9 −4 9 8 6 5
- −1
- 1241±64
- Stephens, Bradden
- 2 6 9 9
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- Rating Change
1160±33 + 14 = 1174±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1206±30
- Lane, Stephen
- 8 −9 6 9 9
- +5
- 1116±40
- Ede, Brendan
- 9 3 5 5
- Brincat, Tony
- Rating Change
1260±31 − 3 = 1257±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1111±42
- Schram, Andrew
- 3 −6 6 7 11
- −5
- 1296±40
- Ede, Paul
- 7 −8 5 −6 4 −8 5
- Carter, Benjamin
- Rating Change
1005±49 + 4 = 1009±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 843±43
- Cochrane, Maureen
- −5 7 9 7 −9 8
- +1
- 707±61
- Goli, Gupta
- 2 −9 −5 −9 3 8 4
- Carter, Josh
- Rating Change
970±49 + 11 = 981±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 938±98
- Zhou, Steven
- 10 8 5 8
- +2
- 765±38
- Falconer, Colin
- 9 9 10 6
- Cauchi, Travis
- Rating Change
1289±39 − 9 = 1280±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1325±37
- Stewart, Craig
- −7 4 −6 6 8 −12 6
- −2
- 1460±41
- Chen, Max
- 6 7 9 9
- Ceu Pa Chung, Mang Hlei
- Rating Change
1241±39 − 8 = 1233±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1283±53
- Cung, Robert
- 11 10 8 9
- Chen, Max
- Rating Change
1447±40 + 15 = 1462±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1480±36
- Lim, Denise
- −6 6 10 9 −6 −6 8
- +2
- 1282±37
- Cauchi, Travis
- 6 7 9 9
- Cheung, Edmond
- Rating Change
1072±47 − 10 = 1062±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1175±31
- Martin, Stephane
- 7 −6 6 5 −9 9
- −4
- 1201±39
- Morgan, Justin
- −7 −5 7 3 6 7
- Chew, Chuan
- Rating Change
1189±31 + 7 = 1196±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1192±45
- Garelli, Simon
- 9 5 4 −7 9
- +1
- 983±39
- Cole, Melanie
- 6 6 8 6
- Cochrane, Maureen
- Rating Change
838±44 + 1 = 839±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 718±50
- Rooke, Adele
- 1 4 8 8
- −3
- 1005±48
- Carter, Benjamin
- −5 7 9 7 −9 8
- Cole, Melanie
- Rating Change
988±40 − 6 = 982±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1072±38
- Xianjiang Cai, Jon
- 9 −11 −8 13 9 −6 8
- −1
- 1195±31
- Chew, Chuan
- 6 6 8 6
- Conroy, Mark
- Rating Change
1043±43 − 13 = 1030±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1042±60
- Powell, Lucy
- 10 2 4 10
- −2
- 1237±64
- Stephens, Bradden
- 0 6 8 6
- Cung, Robert
- Rating Change
1273±50 + 21 = 1294±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1241±39
- Ceu Pa Chung, Mang Hlei
- 11 10 8 9
- +10
- 1230±39
- Tang, Swee Yin
- 6 10 5 −9 6
- D’Amico, Scott
- Rating Change
1639±31 − 3 = 1636±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1448±31
- Neil, Alan
- 6 6 6 5
- −4
- 1694±40
- Lum, Nicholas
- −9 9 8 8 4
- De Zwart, Andrew
- Rating Change
1653±25 − 2 = 1651±25 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1500±39
- Foster, Ron
- −8 4 −6 4 7 8
- −2
- 1726±33
- Lim, Ethan
- 7 7 7 5
- Ede, Brendan
- Rating Change
1124±41 − 14 = 1110±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1170±33
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- 9 3 5 5
- −6
- 1185±36
- Gin, Stewart
- 6 5 3 3
- Ede, Paul
- Rating Change
1319±49 − 15 = 1304±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1262±30
- Brincat, Tony
- 7 −8 5 −6 4 −8 5
- −24
- 1180±37
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- 6 −2 4 −6 8 −9 9
- Elliget, Martin
- Rating Change
1403±33 + 0 = 1403±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1369±33
- Evans, Bruce
- 10 −4 −10 9 6 3
- −5
- 1451±46
- Hewitt, Ged
- 9 −9 3 5 8
- Evans, Bruce
- Rating Change
1382±34 − 19 = 1363±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1269±35
- Newfield, Adam
- 10 4 11 −11 −4 7
- −6
- 1398±32
- Elliget, Martin
- 10 −4 −10 9 6 3
- Falconer, Colin
- Rating Change
781±39 − 15 = 766±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 712±52
- Gadd, James
- −8 8 9 4 7
- −1
- 989±51
- Carter, Josh
- 9 9 10 6
- Foster, Ron
- Rating Change
1502±39 − 5 = 1497±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 1650±25
- De Zwart, Andrew
- −8 4 −6 4 7 8
- −2
- 1656±38
- Roy, Paul
- 5 9 −12 9 9
- Gadd, James
- Rating Change
676±52 + 57 = 733±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +35
- 1001±90
- Zhou, Steven
- 4 5 2 10
- +23
- 779±39
- Falconer, Colin
- −8 8 9 4 7
- Garelli, Simon
- Rating Change
1187±44 − 7 = 1180±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1080±38
- Xianjiang Cai, Jon
- 7 3 7 7
- −12
- 1190±31
- Chew, Chuan
- 9 5 4 −7 9
- Gin, Stewart
- Rating Change
1175±35 + 14 = 1189±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1205±30
- Lane, Stephen
- 4 −7 5 −7 5 −8 6
- +5
- 1115±39
- Ede, Brendan
- 6 5 3 3
- Goldie, Ian
- Rating Change
1160±68 + 28 = 1188±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1115±42
- Stephens, Mark
- 5 8 9 5
- +8
- 1031±38
- Puts, Arnold
- 7 8 6 3
- Goli, Gupta
- Rating Change
671±68 + 34 = 705±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +35
- 731±51
- Rooke, Adele
- 8 12 7 −7 6
- −1
- 1008±48
- Carter, Benjamin
- 2 −9 −5 −9 3 8 4
- Hanna, Emad
- Rating Change
1122±40 + 2 = 1124±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 899±118
- Schnackenberg, Max
- 9 −10 −5 9 9 −5 8
- Haughton, Melanie
- Rating Change
1366±36 − 5 = 1361±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1352±32
- Jefimenko, Walter
- 7 −7 7 9 6
- −13
- 1292±32
- Spizzica, Tony
- −3 −8 6 −16 10 10 9
- Herweynen, Edward John
- Rating Change
1096±39 + 19 = 1115±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1102±37
- Zwartz, Barney
- 4 9 −6 7 −9 8
- +8
- 1094±36
- O’Grady, Steven
- 8 −7 9 −7 −11 10 5
- Hewitt, Ged
- Rating Change
1449±46 + 11 = 1460±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1409±33
- Elliget, Martin
- 9 −9 3 5 8
- +2
- 1286±38
- Newfield, Adam
- 5 6 −6 4 8
- Ho, Allen
- Rating Change
1243±35 − 7 = 1236±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1163±37
- Menz, Gary
- 9 −13 6 8 −7 5
- −11
- 1184±35
- Matthews, Rodney
- −7 3 6 −14 6 −8 8
- Inaps, Andrew
- Rating Change
1081±40 − 9 = 1072±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1154±36
- Menz, Gary
- −10 10 8 −10 −4 8 9
- −3
- 1193±36
- Matthews, Rodney
- −6 6 −9 11 8 8
- Jansen, Michael
- Rating Change
973±48 + 28 = 1001±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1006±47
- Scott, Shondelle
- 4 5 −9 −7 5 9
- +11
- 958±43
- Segar, Ian
- −6 6 8 5 9
- Jefimenko, Walter
- Rating Change
1356±33 − 12 = 1344±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1352±35
- Haughton, Melanie
- 7 −7 7 9 6
- −5
- 1394±38
- Smith, Greg
- 3 5 6 5
- Jones, Cameron
- Rating Change
1023±40 + 6 = 1029±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1038±38
- Puts, Arnold
- 3 8 7 6
- −6
- 1102±41
- Stephens, Mark
- 6 −9 5 9 −7 8
- Labagala, Willy
- Rating Change
1591±37 − 1 = 1590±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1449±31
- Neil, Alan
- 7 5 3 1
- −4
- 1697±40
- Lum, Nicholas
- 5 4 1 5
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- Rating Change
1174±37 + 23 = 1197±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1328±51
- Ede, Paul
- 6 −2 4 −6 8 −9 9
- +5
- 1116±42
- Schram, Andrew
- 6 7 8 −7 9
- Lane, Stephen
- Rating Change
1215±35 − 17 = 1198±29 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1165±32
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- 8 −9 6 9 9
- −7
- 1180±35
- Gin, Stewart
- 4 −7 5 −7 5 −8 6
- Lim, Denise
- Rating Change
1478±37 − 8 = 1470±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1334±37
- Stewart, Craig
- 9 5 11 9
- −10
- 1449±40
- Chen, Max
- −6 6 10 9 −6 −6 8
- Lim, Ethan
- Rating Change
1721±34 + 9 = 1730±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1665±41
- Roy, Paul
- 3 4 5 8
- +4
- 1654±25
- De Zwart, Andrew
- 7 7 7 5
- Lin, Van Lian
- Rating Change
951±53 − 17 = 934±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 937±119
- Schulze, Alfred
- −11 8 5 8 6
- −4
- 1108±45
- Balsillie, David
- 9 7 −11 4 4
- Lum, Nicholas
- Rating Change
1691±39 + 9 = 1700±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1640±31
- D’Amico, Scott
- −9 9 8 8 4
- +4
- 1594±37
- Labagala, Willy
- 5 4 1 5
- Maclean, Lachlan
- Rating Change
966±46 − 9 = 957±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1083±35
- O’Grady, Steven
- 8 −4 6 3 5
- −4
- 1090±36
- Zwartz, Barney
- 10 9 7 3
- Martin, Alan
- Rating Change
1581±27 + 1 = 1582±26 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1556±31
- Menzies, Andrew
- 10 7 −9 −8 −5 9 10
- −3
- 1633±25
- Qin, Renjie Jason
- −5 3 7 6 7
- Martin, Stephane
- Rating Change
1174±31 + 4 = 1178±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1067±45
- Cheung, Edmond
- 7 −6 6 5 −9 9
- +1
- 905±112
- Shaw, Ken
- 8 3 8 4
- Matthews, Rodney
- Rating Change
1181±35 + 15 = 1196±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1247±35
- Ho, Allen
- −7 3 6 −14 6 −8 8
- +3
- 1076±39
- Inaps, Andrew
- −6 6 −9 11 8 8
- Menz, Gary
- Rating Change
1159±38 − 1 = 1158±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1077±39
- Inaps, Andrew
- −10 10 8 −10 −4 8 9
- −5
- 1231±34
- Ho, Allen
- 9 −13 6 8 −7 5
- Menzies, Andrew
- Rating Change
1561±33 − 11 = 1550±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1578±27
- Martin, Alan
- 10 7 −9 −8 −5 9 10
- −5
- 1586±37
- Waterman, Keith
- 7 8 −8 −7 8 −9 9
- Morgan, Justin
- Rating Change
1200±39 + 4 = 1204±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1066±45
- Cheung, Edmond
- −7 −5 7 3 6 7
- +1
- 904±111
- Shaw, Ken
- 9 2 9 3
- Morgan, Shane
- Rating Change
1094±44 + 8 = 1102±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1039±33
- Russo, Vince
- −8 6 9 −7 −3 11 8
- Neil, Alan
- Rating Change
1450±32 − 3 = 1447±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 1587±35
- Labagala, Willy
- 7 5 3 1
- −1
- 1634±30
- D’Amico, Scott
- 6 6 6 5
- Newfield, Adam
- Rating Change
1271±36 + 12 = 1283±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1376±33
- Evans, Bruce
- 10 4 11 −11 −4 7
- −1
- 1458±48
- Hewitt, Ged
- 5 6 −6 4 8
- Noble, Brian
- Rating Change
1120±42 + 16 = 1136±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1129±53
- Balsillie, David
- 7 10 8 13
- +5
- 1034±100
- Schulze, Alfred
- −10 8 9 7 −4 8
- O’Grady, Steven
- Rating Change
1091±36 − 5 = 1086±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 962±45
- Maclean, Lachlan
- 8 −4 6 3 5
- −8
- 1106±38
- Herweynen, Edward John
- 8 −7 9 −7 −11 10 5
- Pal, Pradeesh
- Rating Change
1096±39 + 2 = 1098±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 904±120
- Schnackenberg, Max
- 7 −7 −6 6 5 3
- Powell, Lucy
- Rating Change
1037±61 + 27 = 1064±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1041±42
- Conroy, Mark
- 10 2 4 10
- +4
- 842±104
- Blake, Kieren
- −9 −4 9 8 6 5
- Puts, Arnold
- Rating Change
1042±39 − 14 = 1028±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1018±39
- Jones, Cameron
- 3 8 7 6
- −3
- 1179±68
- Goldie, Ian
- 7 8 6 3
- Qin, Renjie Jason
- Rating Change
1630±26 + 6 = 1636±25 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1601±38
- Waterman, Keith
- −9 8 11 7 −2 8
- +3
- 1586±27
- Martin, Alan
- −5 3 7 6 7
- Robinson, Brian
- Rating Change
909±53 − 22 = 887±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 938±44
- Segar, Ian
- −6 −8 4 8 −9 8 10
- −8
- 982±46
- Scott, Shondelle
- 7 3 13 −6 −6 5
- Rooke, Adele
- Rating Change
739±52 − 28 = 711±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −22
- 670±68
- Goli, Gupta
- 8 12 7 −7 6
- −6
- 835±43
- Cochrane, Maureen
- 1 4 8 8
- Roy, Paul
- Rating Change
1663±41 − 5 = 1658±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1500±39
- Foster, Ron
- 5 9 −12 9 9
- −7
- 1725±33
- Lim, Ethan
- 3 4 5 8
- Russo, Vince
- Rating Change
1029±33 + 6 = 1035±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1083±41
- Atalla, Maged
- −9 8 6 8 11
- −4
- 1094±44
- Morgan, Shane
- −8 6 9 −7 −3 11 8
- Schnackenberg, Max
- Rating Change
923±126 − 36 = 887±114 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −24
- 1096±39
- Pal, Pradeesh
- 7 −7 −6 6 5 3
- −13
- 1122±40
- Hanna, Emad
- 9 −10 −5 9 9 −5 8
- Schram, Andrew
- Rating Change
1119±43 − 10 = 1109±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1191±38
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- 6 7 8 −7 9
- −3
- 1256±30
- Brincat, Tony
- 3 −6 6 7 11
- Schulze, Alfred
- Rating Change
966±130 + 39 = 1005±90 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +66
- 947±52
- Lin, Van Lian
- −11 8 5 8 6
- −27
- 1131±41
- Noble, Brian
- −10 8 9 7 −4 8
- Scott, Shondelle
- Rating Change
999±48 − 9 = 990±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 896±51
- Robinson, Brian
- 7 3 13 −6 −6 5
- −15
- 985±46
- Jansen, Michael
- 4 5 −9 −7 5 9
- Segar, Ian
- Rating Change
948±45 + 0 = 948±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 900±51
- Robinson, Brian
- −6 −8 4 8 −9 8 10
- −10
- 989±46
- Jansen, Michael
- −6 6 8 5 9
- Shaw, Ken
- Rating Change
911±114 − 12 = 899±110 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1177±31
- Martin, Stephane
- 8 3 8 4
- −4
- 1203±39
- Morgan, Justin
- 9 2 9 3
- Smith, Greg
- Rating Change
1413±40 − 11 = 1402±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1350±32
- Jefimenko, Walter
- 3 5 6 5
- −18
- 1290±32
- Spizzica, Tony
- 8 9 −7 7 −3 −8 9
- Spizzica, Tony
- Rating Change
1280±32 + 23 = 1303±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1419±39
- Smith, Greg
- 8 9 −7 7 −3 −8 9
- +11
- 1374±36
- Haughton, Melanie
- −3 −8 6 −16 10 10 9
- Stephens, Bradden
- Rating Change
1237±64 + 4 = 1241±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1032±41
- Conroy, Mark
- 0 6 8 6
- 0
- 831±101
- Blake, Kieren
- 2 6 9 9
- Stephens, Mark
- Rating Change
1110±43 − 1 = 1109±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1035±39
- Jones, Cameron
- 6 −9 5 9 −7 8
- −7
- 1170±68
- Goldie, Ian
- 5 8 9 5
- Stewart, Craig
- Rating Change
1327±38 + 4 = 1331±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1287±38
- Cauchi, Travis
- −7 4 −6 6 8 −12 6
- −3
- 1468±35
- Lim, Denise
- 9 5 11 9
- Tang, Swee Yin
- Rating Change
1230±39 − 7 = 1223±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1284±54
- Cung, Robert
- 6 10 5 −9 6
- Waterman, Keith
- Rating Change
1593±39 + 0 = 1593±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1555±31
- Menzies, Andrew
- 7 8 −8 −7 8 −9 9
- −7
- 1633±25
- Qin, Renjie Jason
- −9 8 11 7 −2 8
- Xianjiang Cai, Jon
- Rating Change
1075±39 + 1 = 1076±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 987±40
- Cole, Melanie
- 9 −11 −8 13 9 −6 8
- −4
- 1176±37
- Garelli, Simon
- 7 3 7 7
- Zhou, Steven
- Rating Change
1101±116 − 201 = 900±83 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −160
- 702±48
- Gadd, James
- 4 5 2 10
- −41
- 972±49
- Carter, Josh
- 10 8 5 8
- Zwartz, Barney
- Rating Change
1099±37 − 6 = 1093±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 962±44
- Maclean, Lachlan
- 10 9 7 3
- −9
- 1105±38
- Herweynen, Edward John
- 4 9 −6 7 −9 8
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 81. Matches: 78. Club: Croydon and Districts Table Tennis Association. Province: VIC. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bristowe, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 21392. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-09 1:28 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-04-28 11:40 pm EDT.