2006 Arizona Open
2006-02-18
Detailed Report
- Annest, Brian
- Rating Change
1649±61 + 58 = 1707±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +30
- 1773±53
- Elhayek, Na Zee
- 5 −9 3 7 −6 7
- −24
- 1631±47
- Lewis, Ken
- 2 7 8
- +23
- 1728±41
- Morris, James R.
- −10 10 −9 4 4 −10 6
- −6
- 1756±44
- Ma, Mankit
- 4 −11 5 9
- +16
- 1699±50
- Lai, Max
- −7 9 6 −1 6 −7 5
- −1
- 1919±47
- Cone, Derrick
- −9 5 4 −8 5
- +10
- 1649±50
- Poon, Daniel
- 9 6 9
- +6
- 1605±50
- Dax, Roger, A.
- 7 8 −9 −4 9
- +2
- 1509±36
- King, Michael
- 9 10 −8 8
- +1
- 1447±42
- DeWitt, Mark
- 3 7 6
- Au, Peter
- Rating Change
1415±122 − 26 = 1389±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +98
- 1609±48
- Fuschino, Michael
- 8 −9 5 −8 9
- −137
- 1187±44
- Williams, Scott
- 10 9 −5 9
- +20
- 1269±39
- Schauer, Franz
- 13 0 16
- −17
- 1432±43
- Pierotti, Joe
- 10 7 −10 1
- +11
- 1243±48
- Mikula, Cyril
- 8 −11 −6 9 12
- −1
- 1632±48
- Poon, Daniel
- 4 3 4
- −1
- 1643±45
- Lewis, Ken
- 6 5 6
- Baldner, Roger
- Rating Change
1420±60 − 80 = 1340±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1080±75
- Dok, Derrick
- 7 −10 5 10
- −37
- 1271±46
- Score, Ron
- 8 3 −6 10
- +1
- 1038±58
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 6 7 4
- −26
- 1308±40
- Cantor, Bill
- 3 6 −7 10
- −18
- 1308±64
- Buckner, James
- 7 −3 9 5
- −1
- 1624±71
- Harrington, John
- 4 6 2
- Banot, John
- Rating Change
931±83 − 5 = 926±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 970±61
- Cottingham, Mike
- 9 6 9
- −42
- 905±46
- Lisook, Lewis
- 4 6 11
- −3
- 1160±75
- Score, Tyler
- 7 −5 −9 4 5
- Barber, Wally
- Rating Change
960±55 − 25 = 935±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0*
- 911±47
- Lisook, Lewis
- 9 −7 6 −7 6
- −21
- 900±79
- Dolan, Kevin
- −8 10 −5 6 4
- +8
- 891±88
- Orris, Darwin
- 10 −9 9 −6 8
- −5*
- 911±47
- Lisook, Lewis
- 8 −8 −9 5 7
- +5
- 826±73
- Del Nero, Jeff
- 7 7 −6 −6 7
- −13
- 920±62
- Cottingham, Mike
- −11 9 −10 8 7
- +2*
- 764±67
- McFadden, Brad
- 2 4 3
- −5
- 1023±61
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 6 4 −7 8
- +2*
- 764±67
- McFadden, Brad
- 3 6 4
- 0
- 1310±85
- Torma, Arpad
- 6 6 6
- +1
- 716±65
- Zaphirio, Ann
- 8 2 1
- 0
- 1333±50
- Chang, Chung-Fu
- 1 5 7
- 0*
- 1344±59
- Buckner, James
- 5 7 8
- 0*
- 1344±59
- Buckner, James
- 7 6 5
- Borrillo, Marco
- Rating Change
1854±66 − 64 = 1790±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −46
- 1682±48
- Lepara, Miralem
- −6 3 7 −9 −7 4 12
- −17
- 1832±59
- Bryant, Robert
- −6 11 −9 6 4 −3 9
- −2
- 2051±69
- Nakada, Mitsutshi
- 11 2 7 9
- Bragau, Petre
- Rating Change
1483±70 − 77 = 1406±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1331±73
- Haney, Ed
- 7 9 3
- −51
- 1303±63
- Buckner, James
- 5 −7 5 −7 9 7
- +8
- 1298±47
- Score, Ron
- 10 8 7
- −29
- 1358±82
- Wong, William
- 8 −8 8 −11 9
- 0
- 1038±58
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- −9 5 6 −13 8
- −17
- 1432±41
- DeWitt, Mark
- 7 10 2
- 0
- 947±57
- Cottingham, Mike
- 4 2 7
- Bryant, Robert
- Rating Change
1826±66 + 22 = 1848±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1807±57
- Borrillo, Marco
- −6 11 −9 6 4 −3 9
- −4
- 2053±68
- Nakada, Mitsutshi
- −8 3 6 7 7
- +8
- 1716±51
- Lepara, Miralem
- −5 −6 −3 5 7 2 6
- −1
- 2137±64
- Potaychuk, Semen
- 11 8 9 −2 6
- 0
- 1312±85
- Torma, Arpad
- 4 5 6 4
- Buckner, James
- Rating Change
1372±100 − 39 = 1333±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +57
- 1443±56
- Bragau, Petre
- 5 −7 5 −7 9 7
- −84
- 1253±39
- Schauer, Franz
- 9 2 −12 −9 9
- +32
- 1361±49
- Baldner, Roger
- 7 −3 9 5
- −33
- 1318±50
- Chang, Chung-Fu
- 7 10 6
- +1
- 1039±58
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 8 8 4
- −9
- 1427±69
- Flores, Victor
- 6 −10 7 4 4
- 0*
- 950±40
- Barber, Wally
- 5 7 8
- −4
- 1492±59
- St. Louis, Mike
- 3 5 3 6
- 0*
- 950±40
- Barber, Wally
- 7 6 5
- −1
- 1626±70
- Harrington, John
- 9 6 7
- 0*
- 918±44
- Lisook, Lewis
- 9 9 10
- 0*
- 918±44
- Lisook, Lewis
- 9 7 9
- Cantor, Bill
- Rating Change
1312±53 + 8 = 1320±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1387±110
- Torma, Arpad
- 5 4 −10 2
- −25
- 1216±49
- Mikula, Cyril
- 7 8 −5 −5 8
- +17
- 1370±50
- Baldner, Roger
- 3 6 −7 10
- −15
- 1278±47
- Score, Ron
- 3 12 9
- +9
- 1273±39
- Schauer, Franz
- −3 5 9 −6 9
- −5
- 1399±45
- Manginelli, Andrew
- −13 −7 8 10 6
- +4*
- 1221±51
- Williams, Scott
- 7 7 9
- 0
- 1580±63
- Soti, Ferenc
- 8 4 9
- +4*
- 1221±51
- Williams, Scott
- −7 3 −10 5 6
- 0
- 1597±60
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- 9 13 4
- +1*
- 1088±78
- Dok, Derrick
- 8 6 −7 5
- 0
- 1632±45
- Kenig, Bill
- 10 4 −7 8
- +1*
- 1088±78
- Dok, Derrick
- 5 9 8
- Chan, Eric
- Rating Change
1272±59 − 13 = 1259±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1069±52
- Redman, Jon
- 8 6 9
- −16
- 1293±77
- Haney, Ed
- −9 −9 7 10 6
- Chan, Keith
- Rating Change
1773±70 − 13 = 1760±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1761±53
- Elhayek, Na Zee
- 9 9 −10 10
- −30
- 1748±44
- Ma, Mankit
- 10 8 11
- +8
- 1650±46
- Lewis, Ken
- 8 7 7 9
- −6
- 1900±52
- Lorenc, Mario
- 6 8 2 11
- +2
- 1555±45
- Turberville, Jay
- 5 9 −8 10
- −4
- 1916±48
- Cone, Derrick
- 8 7 7 7
- −2
- 1985±52
- Dok, Panno
- 3 −9 6 5 −8 8
- −1
- 1998±53
- Houed, Luis F.
- 6 −9 8 −11 8 6
- Chang, Chung-Fu
- Rating Change
1300±60 + 38 = 1338±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 1377±62
- Buckner, James
- 7 10 6
- −7*
- 1424±72
- Flores, Victor
- 6 10 4 6
- +16
- 1310±51
- Score, Ron
- −10 −10 10 6 −8 7 7
- −7*
- 1424±72
- Flores, Victor
- 7 −5 5 2
- +10
- 1274±39
- Schauer, Franz
- 4 7 −8 9 5
- −1
- 1597±60
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- 5 3 6
- +1
- 1068±51
- Redman, Jon
- 4 8 6
- 0
- 950±40
- Barber, Wally
- 1 5 7
- 0
- 918±44
- Lisook, Lewis
- 4 2 6
- Chernobelskiy, Mikhail
- Rating Change
1608±92 + 103 = 1711±82 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +56
- 1660±47
- Lewis, Ken
- −4 10 −9 6 6 2
- +36
- 1650±49
- Poon, Daniel
- −8 4 8 −7 −13 9 8
- +7
- 1510±36
- King, Michael
- 7 8 −9 3
- +3
- 1448±42
- DeWitt, Mark
- 6 4 8
- 0
- 1298±49
- Ekbundit, Patrick
- 7 −1 −6 5 6
- 0
- 1281±62
- McGue, Frank
- 7 −9 11 0
- Christophersen, Vigo
- Rating Change
2244±115 + 51 = 2295±101 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +35
- 2153±70
- Potaychuk, Semen
- 10 2 3 2
- +11
- 2066±73
- Nakada, Mitsutshi
- 2 4 −9 5 7
- +2
- 1942±61
- Lai, Alex
- 3 3 7 7
- +1
- 1907±51
- Lorenc, Mario
- 5 10 8 8
- +1
- 1877±75
- Rubin, David
- 8 9 7 5
- 0
- 1645±45
- Lewis, Ken
- 1 7 2 8
- Cone, Derrick
- Rating Change
1931±62 − 12 = 1919±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +30
- 2029±57
- Houed, Luis F.
- 6 −9 10 −2 10 10
- −39
- 1786±44
- Shieh, Michael
- −9 6 −8 10 −7 8 15
- +5
- 1768±52
- Chan, Keith
- 8 7 7 7
- −10
- 1975±53
- Dok, Panno
- 11 10 −9 9 −8 −7 4
- +4
- 1764±43
- Ma, Mankit
- 9 7 5 8
- −5
- 2045±70
- Nakada, Mitsutshi
- −8 5 −11 9 3 8
- +2
- 1715±48
- Annest, Brian
- −9 5 4 −8 5
- +1
- 1646±45
- Lewis, Ken
- 7 10 7
- 0
- 1594±48
- Dax, Roger, A.
- 7 9 9
- 0
- 1506±36
- King, Michael
- 8 5 5
- Connolly, Patrick
- Rating Change
1343±52 + 6 = 1349±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1272±39
- Schauer, Franz
- 9 8 5
- −5
- 1495±59
- St. Louis, Mike
- 7 9 8
- +3
- 1161±49
- Vays, Lev
- 3 7 8
- 0
- 1715±34
- Morris, James R.
- 7 7 9
- Cottingham, Mike
- Rating Change
1000±100 − 70 = 930±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 956±41
- Barber, Wally
- −11 9 −10 8 7
- −76
- 883±69
- Banot, John
- 9 6 9
- +12
- 822±70
- Del Nero, Jeff
- −9 6 5 6
- −45
- 902±46
- Lisook, Lewis
- 9 4 10
- +6
- 759±65
- McFadden, Brad
- 10 6 5
- −12
- 1022±61
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 10 9 8
- +3
- 716±65
- Zaphirio, Ann
- 3 3 3
- −2
- 1155±75
- Score, Tyler
- 7 −4 4 4
- 0
- 1294±46
- Score, Ron
- 1 5 4
- 0
- 1308±86
- Torma, Arpad
- 5 3 −6 5
- 0
- 1422±53
- Bragau, Petre
- 4 2 7
- Dax, Roger, A.
- Rating Change
1657±58 − 62 = 1595±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −38
- 1490±36
- King, Michael
- 6 8 −7 10
- −16
- 1630±47
- Lewis, Ken
- 5 5 7
- −7
- 1704±47
- Annest, Brian
- 7 8 −9 −4 9
- 0
- 1919±47
- Cone, Derrick
- 7 9 9
- Del Nero, Jeff
- Rating Change
753±84 + 41 = 794±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +38
- 782±67
- McFadden, Brad
- 3 5 2
- −9
- 942±59
- Cottingham, Mike
- −9 6 5 6
- +19
- 735±69
- Zaphirio, Ann
- 4 7 2
- −7
- 947±41
- Barber, Wally
- 7 7 −6 −6 7
- 0
- 1311±85
- Torma, Arpad
- −9 8 12 −9 6
- DeWitt, Mark
- Rating Change
1447±58 − 2 = 1445±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1518±37
- King, Michael
- −9 −17 8 6 8
- −35
- 1230±64
- McGue, Frank
- −4 13 5 4
- +12
- 1453±85
- Wong, William
- 6 11 4
- −16
- 1390±51
- Rodich, Mile
- −5 2 3 −10 −8 9 8
- +11
- 1440±57
- Bragau, Petre
- 7 10 2
- −1*
- 1629±48
- Poon, Daniel
- 4 1 2 8
- +5
- 1336±74
- Haney, Ed
- 9 −7 3 −8 5
- −1*
- 1629±48
- Poon, Daniel
- 7 5 3
- +3
- 1302±51
- Ekbundit, Patrick
- −10 7 9 8
- −1
- 1690±83
- Chernobelskiy, Mikhail
- 6 4 8
- 0
- 1712±46
- Annest, Brian
- 3 7 6
- 0
- 1760±43
- Ma, Mankit
- 8 7 7
- Dok, Daphne
- Rating Change
1100±100 − 60 = 1040±81 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 756±65
- McFadden, Brad
- 4 1 4
- −56
- 1063±69
- Liermann, Brad
- −9 9 5 3
- −7
- 1263±39
- Schauer, Franz
- 4 11 4
- −1
- 1442±67
- Flores, Victor
- 2 2 2
- Dok, Derrick
- Rating Change
1106±86 − 25 = 1081±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1292±46
- Score, Ron
- 5 5 6
- −5*
- 1321±40
- Cantor, Bill
- 8 6 −7 5
- −5*
- 1321±40
- Cantor, Bill
- 5 9 8
- −3
- 1348±48
- Baldner, Roger
- 7 −10 5 10
- −1
- 1404±44
- Manginelli, Andrew
- 7 −7 −9 6 4
- 0
- 1632±45
- Kenig, Bill
- 5 7 6
- Dok, Panno
- Rating Change
1965±63 + 19 = 1984±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 2025±57
- Houed, Luis F.
- 9 −9 6 −8 −8 9 10
- −28
- 1912±61
- Lai, Alex
- −4 6 11 7 11
- +14
- 1932±49
- Cone, Derrick
- 11 10 −9 9 −8 −7 4
- +2
- 1766±52
- Chan, Keith
- 3 −9 6 5 −8 8
- +2
- 1763±43
- Ma, Mankit
- 2 3 7 3
- Dolan, Kevin
- Rating Change
778±106 + 146 = 924±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +101
- 966±42
- Barber, Wally
- −8 10 −5 6 4
- −9
- 1035±59
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 9 6 −4 6
- +44
- 918±84
- Orris, Darwin
- 6 −12 8 7
- −2
- 1164±74
- Score, Tyler
- 9 −8 4 −8 5 1
- +13
- 776±67
- McFadden, Brad
- 1 2 4
- Ekbundit, Patrick
- Rating Change
1263±61 + 45 = 1308±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 1430±47
- Manginelli, Andrew
- 6 −3 −5 8 11
- −7
- 1406±50
- Rodich, Mile
- 5 6 3
- +18
- 1312±68
- McGue, Frank
- −12 −0 5 5 7
- −4
- 1443±41
- DeWitt, Mark
- −10 7 9 8
- +5
- 1158±60
- Welsh, Robert
- 10 3 7
- −2
- 1505±36
- King, Michael
- 7 9 7
- 0
- 1694±83
- Chernobelskiy, Mikhail
- 7 −1 −6 5 6
- Elhayek, Na Zee
- Rating Change
1783±73 − 49 = 1734±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1720±37
- Morris, James R.
- −5 7 −12 2 9
- −43
- 1695±46
- Annest, Brian
- 5 −9 3 7 −6 7
- +8
- 1640±72
- Harrington, John
- 9 −4 9 −4 3
- −22
- 1744±54
- Chan, Keith
- 9 9 −10 10
- +3
- 1555±45
- Turberville, Jay
- −7 9 6 7
- −16
- 1748±44
- Ma, Mankit
- 11 8 −7 4
- +1
- 1474±52
- Schaad, Andrew
- 7 −10 8 −7 14
- 0
- 1066±51
- Redman, Jon
- 4 3 5
- Flores, Victor
- Rating Change
1471±119 − 18 = 1453±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +35
- 1354±60
- Buckner, James
- 6 −10 7 4 4
- −86
- 1394±50
- Rodich, Mile
- 10 −6 3 8 4
- +17*
- 1345±57
- Chang, Chung-Fu
- 6 10 4 6
- −10
- 1590±61
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- −7 4 4 8
- +17*
- 1345±57
- Chang, Chung-Fu
- 7 −5 5 2
- +6
- 1268±39
- Schauer, Franz
- 6 5 −9 −9 9
- +1
- 1091±67
- Liermann, Brad
- 3 4 5
- 0*
- 1067±51
- Redman, Jon
- 10 6 4
- 0*
- 1067±51
- Redman, Jon
- 5 4 6 6
- 0
- 1057±79
- Dok, Daphne
- 2 2 2
- 0
- 755±64
- McFadden, Brad
- 5 0 2
- Fuschino, Michael
- Rating Change
1648±56 − 63 = 1585±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1659±48
- Lewis, Ken
- 5 −2 6 4
- −40
- 1316±69
- Au, Peter
- 8 −9 5 −8 9
- −34
- 1416±43
- Pierotti, Joe
- 8 −3 7 −7 8
- −11
- 1617±49
- Poon, Daniel
- 5 −10 −3 7 9
- Haney, Ed
- Rating Change
1350±100 − 37 = 1313±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 1277±59
- Chan, Eric
- −9 −9 7 10 6
- −38
- 1391±79
- Wong, William
- 6 5 9
- +3
- 1068±51
- Redman, Jon
- 9 4 10
- −22
- 1411±55
- Bragau, Petre
- 7 9 3
- −12
- 1440±41
- DeWitt, Mark
- 9 −7 3 −8 5
- Haq, Eyen-Ul
- Rating Change
1271±52 + 11 = 1282±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 1464±44
- Pierotti, Joe
- 8 8 −9 −7 9
- −16
- 1252±67
- McGue, Frank
- 4 −11 6 9
- −1
- 1505±36
- King, Michael
- 5 9 9
- Harrington, John
- Rating Change
1782±119 − 162 = 1620±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1475±52
- Schaad, Andrew
- −8 8 −9 5 9
- −125
- 1563±60
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- 5 8 −5 4 6
- +3
- 1350±48
- Baldner, Roger
- 4 6 2
- −35
- 1707±34
- Morris, James R.
- 6 −2 −7 6 9
- +2
- 1345±59
- Buckner, James
- 9 6 7
- −18
- 1731±51
- Elhayek, Na Zee
- 9 −4 9 −4 3
- 0
- 1066±51
- Redman, Jon
- 4 7 3
- −2
- 1900±51
- Lorenc, Mario
- 4 3 9 4
- 0
- 1038±58
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 2 2 6
- Houed, Luis F.
- Rating Change
2060±66 − 68 = 1992±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1764±51
- Chan, Keith
- 6 −9 8 −11 8 6
- −46
- 1894±48
- Cone, Derrick
- 6 −9 10 −2 10 10
- +2
- 1761±43
- Ma, Mankit
- 10 6 7 9
- −26
- 1962±52
- Dok, Panno
- 9 −9 6 −8 −8 9 10
- Immaneni, Pramod
- Rating Change
1553±67 + 36 = 1589±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +38
- 1642±45
- Trudell, Robert
- 14 5 −17 7 6
- −2
- 1873±75
- Rubin, David
- 7 6 5 5
- −1
- 1919±55
- Leu, Gia
- 5 4 9 9
- 0
- 2138±63
- Potaychuk, Semen
- 5 5 9 8
- Johnson, Xin
- Rating Change
1209±121 − 153 = 1056±83 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −104
- 1074±63
- Magras, Jane
- 7 4 8
- −49
- 1089±54
- Oswald, Evan
- 10 4 7
- Kenig, Bill
- Rating Change
1644±56 − 9 = 1635±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1660±48
- Lewis, Ken
- 5 3 8
- −21
- 1617±49
- Poon, Daniel
- 6 9 −8 7 11
- +8
- 1561±46
- Turberville, Jay
- −6 9 9 7
- −11
- 1670±47
- Lai, Max
- −5 −5 10 9 6
- +1
- 1407±45
- Manginelli, Andrew
- 8 8 −12 4
- −4
- 1756±44
- Ma, Mankit
- 5 4 8 11
- 0
- 1324±39
- Cantor, Bill
- 10 4 −7 8
- 0
- 1079±74
- Dok, Derrick
- 5 7 6
- King, Michael
- Rating Change
1546±49 − 39 = 1507±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1616±51
- Dax, Roger, A.
- 6 8 −7 10
- −27
- 1381±45
- Manginelli, Andrew
- −4 −8 9 9 7 10
- +6
- 1446±44
- Pierotti, Joe
- −12 12 10 12
- −20
- 1427±41
- DeWitt, Mark
- −9 −17 8 6 8
- +1
- 1298±50
- Ekbundit, Patrick
- 7 9 7
- −7
- 1557±67
- Soti, Ferenc
- 8 −3 4 8
- +1*
- 1284±63
- McGue, Frank
- 12 −7 5 −8 4
- −6
- 1569±55
- Tang, Jason
- 8 −5 9 8
- +1*
- 1284±63
- McGue, Frank
- 9 3 9
- −3
- 1638±46
- Lewis, Ken
- 3 9 −10 6
- +1
- 1281±48
- Haq, Eyen-Ul
- 5 9 9
- −2
- 1682±84
- Chernobelskiy, Mikhail
- 7 8 −9 3
- −1
- 1705±49
- Lepara, Miralem
- −6 −6 5 5 9
- −1
- 1710±47
- Annest, Brian
- 9 10 −8 8
- 0
- 1920±47
- Cone, Derrick
- 8 5 5
- Lai, Alex
- Rating Change
1892±68 + 61 = 1953±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +42
- 2019±62
- Dok, Panno
- −4 6 11 7 11
- −4
- 2136±64
- Potaychuk, Semen
- −7 6 9 10 −8 8
- +22
- 1928±59
- Lorenc, Mario
- 9 9 −7 −7 8 10
- −1
- 2288±103
- Christophersen, Vigo
- 3 3 7 7
- +1
- 1646±45
- Lewis, Ken
- 8 6 13 6
- Lai, Max
- Rating Change
1705±60 − 18 = 1687±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1641±46
- Kenig, Bill
- −5 −5 10 9 6
- −29
- 1626±46
- Lewis, Ken
- 8 13 −10 7
- +7
- 1593±55
- Tang, Jason
- 8 5 4 5
- −14
- 1700±47
- Annest, Brian
- −7 9 6 −1 6 −7 5
- +5
- 1557±46
- Turberville, Jay
- 9 5 8
- Lepara, Miralem
- Rating Change
1677±60 + 28 = 1705±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1824±57
- Borrillo, Marco
- −6 3 7 −9 −7 4 12
- −18
- 1709±34
- Morris, James R.
- 6 −6 5 8 6
- +8
- 1597±68
- Soti, Ferenc
- 8 −7 7 7
- −4
- 1849±59
- Bryant, Robert
- −5 −6 −3 5 7 2 6
- +7
- 1595±56
- Tang, Jason
- 5 6 6
- 0
- 2056±68
- Nakada, Mitsutshi
- 5 −10 7 8 3
- +2
- 1508±36
- King, Michael
- −6 −6 5 5 9
- Leu, Gia
- Rating Change
1956±63 − 37 = 1919±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1624±44
- Trudell, Robert
- 4 6 10 10
- −35
- 1817±77
- Rubin, David
- 4 9 13 −5 5
- +1
- 1590±61
- Immaneni, Pramod
- 5 4 9 9
- −3
- 2133±65
- Potaychuk, Semen
- 4 6 5 9
- Lewis, Ken
- Rating Change
1538±102 + 110 = 1648±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +68
- 1738±54
- Annest, Brian
- 2 7 8
- −40
- 1580±48
- Fuschino, Michael
- 5 −2 6 4
- +46
- 1702±49
- Lai, Max
- 8 13 −10 7
- −16
- 1626±45
- Kenig, Bill
- 5 3 8
- +28
- 1653±49
- Poon, Daniel
- 7 −10 6 8
- −8
- 1683±83
- Chernobelskiy, Mikhail
- −4 10 −9 6 6 2
- +17
- 1611±50
- Dax, Roger, A.
- 5 5 7
- −2
- 1761±52
- Chan, Keith
- 8 7 7 9
- +10
- 1566±46
- Turberville, Jay
- −3 −8 1 16 5
- −1
- 1808±47
- Shieh, Michael
- 9 9 10
- +5
- 1512±36
- King, Michael
- 3 9 −10 6
- 0
- 1906±51
- Lorenc, Mario
- 4 7 7 6
- +2
- 1446±43
- Pierotti, Joe
- 4 4 6
- 0
- 1920±47
- Cone, Derrick
- 7 10 7
- +1
- 1410±45
- Manginelli, Andrew
- 12 5 7 −8 6
- 0
- 1939±60
- Lai, Alex
- 8 6 13 6
- +1
- 1396±73
- Au, Peter
- 6 5 6
- 0
- 2289±102
- Christophersen, Vigo
- 1 7 2 8
- Liermann, Brad
- Rating Change
985±108 + 102 = 1087±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +91
- 1183±52
- Vays, Lev
- −7 −7 8 8 5
- −37
- 1057±52
- Redman, Jon
- 1 3 8
- +41
- 1106±84
- Dok, Daphne
- −9 9 5 3
- −3
- 1265±38
- Schauer, Franz
- 7 6 −9 5
- +9
- 925±45
- Lisook, Lewis
- 8 9 9
- 0
- 1443±67
- Flores, Victor
- 3 4 5
- +1
- 760±66
- McFadden, Brad
- 6 6 2
- Lisook, Lewis
- Rating Change
900±61 + 29 = 929±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 977±61
- Cottingham, Mike
- 9 4 10
- 0*
- 956±43
- Barber, Wally
- 9 −7 6 −7 6
- +14
- 956±72
- Banot, John
- 4 6 11
- −8
- 1030±60
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 8 7 −4 −3 10 12
- +8*
- 956±43
- Barber, Wally
- 8 −8 −9 5 7
- −5
- 1062±52
- Redman, Jon
- 14 7 8
- −3
- 1084±68
- Liermann, Brad
- 8 9 9
- −1
- 1157±48
- Vays, Lev
- 5 4 5
- −1
- 1162±75
- Score, Tyler
- 10 9 7
- 0
- 1333±50
- Chang, Chung-Fu
- 4 2 6
- 0*
- 1345±59
- Buckner, James
- 9 9 10
- 0*
- 1345±59
- Buckner, James
- 9 7 9
- Lorenc, Mario
- Rating Change
1897±64 + 14 = 1911±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11*
- 1832±65
- Shieh, Michael
- 10 −9 10 13 7
- −20
- 1922±62
- Lai, Alex
- 9 9 −7 −7 8 10
- +11*
- 1832±65
- Shieh, Michael
- 3 12 4
- 0
- 2288±103
- Christophersen, Vigo
- 5 10 8 8
- +6
- 1770±53
- Chan, Keith
- 6 8 2 11
- +2
- 1675±60
- Wang, Jinlin
- 7 4 5
- +1
- 1646±45
- Lewis, Ken
- 4 7 7 6
- +1
- 1632±70
- Harrington, John
- 4 3 9 4
- +1
- 1625±44
- Trudell, Robert
- 7 7 −7 5
- 0
- 1474±52
- Schaad, Andrew
- 4 4 5
- Ma, Mankit
- Rating Change
1801±65 − 37 = 1764±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1778±54
- Chan, Keith
- 10 8 11
- −53
- 1525±46
- Turberville, Jay
- −9 −10 11 6 5
- +16
- 1758±53
- Elhayek, Na Zee
- 11 8 −7 4
- −27
- 1704±34
- Morris, James R.
- 9 −20 1 9 9
- +11
- 1722±51
- Annest, Brian
- 4 −11 5 9
- −11
- 1796±46
- Shieh, Michael
- −8 −5 6 −8 7 9 5
- +5
- 1638±48
- Poon, Daniel
- 6 3 9
- −3
- 1915±48
- Cone, Derrick
- 9 7 5 8
- +4
- 1636±45
- Kenig, Bill
- 5 4 8 11
- −1
- 1984±52
- Dok, Panno
- 2 3 7 3
- 0
- 1445±41
- DeWitt, Mark
- 8 7 7
- −1
- 1997±54
- Houed, Luis F.
- 10 6 7 9
- Magras, Jane
- Rating Change
1056±73 + 46 = 1102±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 1133±54
- Oswald, Evan
- −7 8 3 −9 7
- −16
- 1151±49
- Vays, Lev
- 4 9 −9 4 5
- +24
- 1121±96
- Johnson, Xin
- 7 4 8
- Manginelli, Andrew
- Rating Change
1390±57 + 24 = 1414±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1521±37
- King, Michael
- −4 −8 9 9 7 10
- −31
- 1271±50
- Ekbundit, Patrick
- 6 −3 −5 8 11
- +18
- 1431±53
- Rodich, Mile
- 9 9 9
- −2
- 1595±61
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- −10 5 4 4 −10 8
- +8
- 1331±41
- Cantor, Bill
- −13 −7 8 10 6
- −1
- 1631±45
- Kenig, Bill
- 8 8 −12 4
- +1
- 1150±58
- Welsh, Robert
- 7 10 7
- −1
- 1644±45
- Lewis, Ken
- 12 5 7 −8 6
- 0
- 1080±75
- Dok, Derrick
- 7 −7 −9 6 4
- McFadden, Brad
- Rating Change
1000±100 − 241 = 759±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −126
- 656±70
- Zaphirio, Ann
- 5 8 11
- −64
- 762±71
- Del Nero, Jeff
- 3 5 2
- −18
- 905±77
- Dolan, Kevin
- 1 2 4
- −12
- 922±60
- Cottingham, Mike
- 10 6 5
- −7*
- 931±42
- Barber, Wally
- 2 4 3
- −7*
- 931±42
- Barber, Wally
- 3 6 4
- −2
- 1022±61
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 5 1 2
- −3
- 1027±86
- Dok, Daphne
- 4 1 4
- −1
- 1075±69
- Liermann, Brad
- 6 6 2
- 0
- 1265±38
- Schauer, Franz
- 0 2 1
- 0
- 1308±86
- Torma, Arpad
- 3 2 1
- 0
- 1443±67
- Flores, Victor
- 5 0 2
- McGue, Frank
- Rating Change
1225±86 + 64 = 1289±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +66
- 1466±44
- DeWitt, Mark
- −4 13 5 4
- −27
- 1288±50
- Ekbundit, Patrick
- −12 −0 5 5 7
- +31
- 1302±57
- Haq, Eyen-Ul
- 4 −11 6 9
- −4
- 1438±43
- Pierotti, Joe
- 5 11 1
- −1*
- 1505±36
- King, Michael
- 12 −7 5 −8 4
- −1*
- 1505±36
- King, Michael
- 9 3 9
- 0
- 1694±83
- Chernobelskiy, Mikhail
- 7 −9 11 0
- Mikula, Cyril
- Rating Change
1235±55 + 6 = 1241±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1340±41
- Cantor, Bill
- 7 8 −5 −5 8
- −16
- 1258±39
- Schauer, Franz
- 7 −7 8 −8 6
- −4
- 1374±74
- Au, Peter
- 8 −11 −6 9 12
- 0
- 1581±63
- Soti, Ferenc
- 1 4 3
- 0
- 1598±60
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- 5 6 9
- Morris, James R.
- Rating Change
1700±39 + 16 = 1716±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1780±45
- Ma, Mankit
- 9 −20 1 9 9
- −9
- 1699±47
- Annest, Brian
- −10 10 −9 4 4 −10 6
- +9
- 1730±55
- Lepara, Miralem
- 6 −6 5 8 6
- −6
- 1732±52
- Elhayek, Na Zee
- −5 7 −12 2 9
- +5
- 1654±76
- Harrington, John
- 6 −2 −7 6 9
- +3
- 1613±67
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- 2 7 7 −3 6
- +1*
- 1513±69
- St. Louis, Mike
- 5 6 5 6
- +1*
- 1513±69
- St. Louis, Mike
- 11 3 −9 8
- +1
- 1475±53
- Schaad, Andrew
- 3 8 7
- 0
- 1345±47
- Connolly, Patrick
- 7 7 9
- 0
- 1266±38
- Schauer, Franz
- 6 5 5
- 0
- 1158±48
- Vays, Lev
- 3 4 8
- 0
- 1066±51
- Redman, Jon
- 7 9 9
- Nakada, Mitsutshi
- Rating Change
2038±79 + 18 = 2056±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1927±48
- Cone, Derrick
- −8 5 −11 9 3 8
- −6
- 2281±105
- Christophersen, Vigo
- 2 4 −9 5 7
- +6
- 1861±63
- Bryant, Robert
- −8 3 6 7 7
- +2
- 1792±55
- Borrillo, Marco
- 11 2 7 9
- +1
- 1710±48
- Lepara, Miralem
- 5 −10 7 8 3
- 0
- 1311±85
- Torma, Arpad
- 2 2 2 2
- Noguera, Miguel
- Rating Change
1311±84 − 86 = 1225±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1180±80
- Score, Tyler
- 7 8 6
- −72
- 1133±48
- Vays, Lev
- 9 2 7 6
- +5
- 1040±59
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 5 5 7
- −40
- 1188±45
- Williams, Scott
- 4 13 6
- Orris, Darwin
- Rating Change
964±94 − 87 = 877±77 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −54
- 909±77
- Dolan, Kevin
- 6 −12 8 7
- −33
- 939±41
- Barber, Wally
- 10 −9 9 −6 8
- Oswald, Evan
- Rating Change
1129±61 − 20 = 1109±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1103±97
- Johnson, Xin
- 10 4 7
- −27
- 1073±64
- Magras, Jane
- −7 8 3 −9 7
- −9
- 1200±45
- Williams, Scott
- −9 9 8 14 −9 7
- Pierotti, Joe
- Rating Change
1436±56 + 11 = 1447±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +30
- 1616±48
- Fuschino, Michael
- 8 −3 7 −7 8
- −36
- 1253±47
- Haq, Eyen-Ul
- 8 8 −9 −7 9
- +14
- 1426±53
- Rodich, Mile
- −7 4 8 9 −7 10
- −7
- 1501±37
- King, Michael
- −12 12 10 12
- +10
- 1413±77
- Au, Peter
- 10 7 −10 1
- −3
- 1592±61
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- 8 6 10 5
- +3
- 1299±48
- Score, Ron
- 3 5 6 9
- −1
- 1632±48
- Poon, Daniel
- 8 3 7
- +3
- 1288±64
- McGue, Frank
- 5 11 1
- −1
- 1643±45
- Lewis, Ken
- 4 4 6
- Poon, Daniel
- Rating Change
1654±74 − 17 = 1637±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1644±47
- Kenig, Bill
- 6 9 −8 7 11
- −33
- 1631±46
- Lewis, Ken
- 7 −10 6 8
- +15
- 1599±48
- Fuschino, Michael
- 5 −10 −3 7 9
- −17
- 1663±82
- Chernobelskiy, Mikhail
- −8 4 8 −7 −13 9 8
- +3*
- 1448±42
- DeWitt, Mark
- 4 1 2 8
- −10
- 1704±47
- Annest, Brian
- 9 6 9
- +3*
- 1448±42
- DeWitt, Mark
- 7 5 3
- −5
- 1756±43
- Ma, Mankit
- 6 3 9
- +2
- 1442±43
- Pierotti, Joe
- 8 3 7
- +1
- 1388±71
- Au, Peter
- 4 3 4
- Potaychuk, Semen
- Rating Change
2141±72 + 1 = 2142±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1945±64
- Lai, Alex
- −7 6 9 10 −8 8
- −13
- 2265±107
- Christophersen, Vigo
- 10 2 3 2
- +4
- 1922±56
- Leu, Gia
- 4 6 5 9
- +2
- 1879±77
- Rubin, David
- 4 7 11 6
- +2
- 1856±60
- Bryant, Robert
- 11 8 9 −2 6
- 0
- 1624±44
- Trudell, Robert
- 4 9 4 6
- 0
- 1589±61
- Immaneni, Pramod
- 5 5 9 8
- Redman, Jon
- Rating Change
1093±68 − 9 = 1084±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1125±76
- Liermann, Brad
- 1 3 8
- −19
- 1149±49
- Vays, Lev
- −8 −7 10 6 8
- +4
- 921±44
- Lisook, Lewis
- 14 7 8
- −8
- 1202±45
- Williams, Scott
- −8 −7 1 −4 7 5 6
- −4
- 1261±55
- Chan, Eric
- 8 6 9
- −2
- 1317±72
- Haney, Ed
- 9 4 10
- −1
- 1332±50
- Chang, Chung-Fu
- 4 8 6
- 0*
- 1442±68
- Flores, Victor
- 10 6 4
- 0*
- 1442±68
- Flores, Victor
- 5 4 6 6
- 0
- 1598±60
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- 6 5 3
- 0
- 1630±69
- Harrington, John
- 4 7 3
- 0
- 1715±34
- Morris, James R.
- 7 9 9
- 0
- 1746±50
- Elhayek, Na Zee
- 4 3 5
- Rodich, Mile
- Rating Change
1396±65 + 22 = 1418±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 1491±79
- Flores, Victor
- 10 −6 3 8 4
- −25
- 1393±46
- Manginelli, Andrew
- 9 9 9
- +24
- 1460±44
- DeWitt, Mark
- −5 2 3 −10 −8 9 8
- −14
- 1431±44
- Pierotti, Joe
- −7 4 8 9 −7 10
- +7
- 1305±52
- Ekbundit, Patrick
- 5 6 3
- +1
- 1150±58
- Welsh, Robert
- 0 5 6
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- Rating Change
1004±100 + 40 = 1044±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 972±82
- Dolan, Kevin
- 9 6 −4 6
- −16*
- 1147±76
- Score, Tyler
- −6 −7 8 1 4
- +24
- 961±60
- Cottingham, Mike
- 10 9 8
- −16*
- 1147±76
- Score, Tyler
- 9 10 −22 −9 −11 3 9
- +17
- 956±41
- Barber, Wally
- 6 4 −7 8
- −6
- 1205±45
- Williams, Scott
- 9 7 −11 8
- +10
- 924±45
- Lisook, Lewis
- 8 7 −4 −3 10 12
- −6
- 1207±66
- Noguera, Miguel
- 5 5 7
- +1
- 759±65
- McFadden, Brad
- 5 1 2
- −2
- 1294±46
- Score, Ron
- −9 9 10 7
- −1
- 1344±59
- Buckner, James
- 8 8 4
- −1
- 1349±48
- Baldner, Roger
- 6 7 4
- 0
- 1422±53
- Bragau, Petre
- −9 5 6 −13 8
- 0
- 1630±69
- Harrington, John
- 2 2 6
- Rubin, David
- Rating Change
1802±85 + 72 = 1874±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +68
- 1951±60
- Leu, Gia
- 4 9 13 −5 5
- −2
- 2137±64
- Potaychuk, Semen
- 4 7 11 6
- +4
- 1627±45
- Trudell, Robert
- 5 8 6 −9 4
- 0
- 2289±103
- Christophersen, Vigo
- 8 9 7 5
- +3
- 1594±64
- Immaneni, Pramod
- 7 6 5 5
- Schaad, Andrew
- Rating Change
1488±58 − 19 = 1469±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1618±73
- Harrington, John
- −8 8 −9 5 9
- −6
- 1620±45
- Trudell, Robert
- 6 4 8
- −3
- 1667±60
- Wang, Jinlin
- 10 −8 5 6
- −1
- 1714±34
- Morris, James R.
- 3 8 7
- −1
- 1745±50
- Elhayek, Na Zee
- 7 −10 8 −7 14
- 0
- 1809±47
- Shieh, Michael
- 9 3 2
- 0
- 1906±51
- Lorenc, Mario
- 4 4 5
- Schauer, Franz
- Rating Change
1267±52 + 5 = 1272±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1382±62
- Buckner, James
- 9 2 −12 −9 9
- −11
- 1317±40
- Cantor, Bill
- −3 5 9 −6 9
- +10
- 1253±51
- Mikula, Cyril
- 7 −7 8 −8 6
- −8
- 1323±51
- Chang, Chung-Fu
- 4 7 −8 9 5
- +4
- 1166±51
- Vays, Lev
- −9 −9 8 6 9
- −6
- 1337±48
- Connolly, Patrick
- 9 8 5
- +2
- 1098±70
- Liermann, Brad
- 7 6 −9 5
- −4
- 1369±75
- Au, Peter
- 13 0 16
- +2
- 1064±82
- Dok, Daphne
- 4 11 4
- −2
- 1437±69
- Flores, Victor
- 6 5 −9 −9 9
- 0
- 755±64
- McFadden, Brad
- 0 2 1
- −1
- 1498±59
- St. Louis, Mike
- 4 3 −9 1
- 0
- 1715±34
- Morris, James R.
- 6 5 5
- Score, Ron
- Rating Change
1262±57 + 31 = 1293±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1374±50
- Baldner, Roger
- 8 3 −6 10
- −13
- 1324±51
- Chang, Chung-Fu
- −10 −10 10 6 −8 7 7
- +20
- 1339±41
- Cantor, Bill
- 3 12 9
- −4
- 1417±54
- Bragau, Petre
- 10 8 7
- +2
- 1087±77
- Dok, Derrick
- 5 5 6
- −3
- 1438±43
- Pierotti, Joe
- 3 5 6 9
- +1
- 1041±59
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- −9 9 10 7
- 0
- 948±58
- Cottingham, Mike
- 1 5 4
- Score, Tyler
- Rating Change
1080±81 + 99 = 1179±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +62
- 1229±50
- Williams, Scott
- 9 9 −9 −8 4
- −17
- 1202±67
- Noguera, Miguel
- 7 8 6
- +19*
- 1067±63
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- −6 −7 8 1 4
- +19*
- 1067±63
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 9 10 −22 −9 −11 3 9
- +6
- 962±80
- Dolan, Kevin
- 9 −8 4 −8 5 1
- +5
- 955±60
- Cottingham, Mike
- 7 −4 4 4
- +3
- 928±68
- Banot, John
- 7 −5 −9 4 5
- +3
- 922±44
- Lisook, Lewis
- 10 9 7
- Shieh, Michael
- Rating Change
1768±53 + 42 = 1810±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 1949±49
- Cone, Derrick
- −9 6 −8 10 −7 8 15
- −5*
- 1896±52
- Lorenc, Mario
- 10 −9 10 13 7
- +13
- 1773±45
- Ma, Mankit
- −8 −5 6 −8 7 9 5
- −5*
- 1896±52
- Lorenc, Mario
- 3 12 4
- +5
- 1686±64
- Wang, Jinlin
- −10 5 7 9
- +3
- 1650±47
- Lewis, Ken
- 9 9 10
- +2
- 1628±45
- Trudell, Robert
- −13 9 −9 10 12
- 0
- 1474±52
- Schaad, Andrew
- 9 3 2
- Soti, Ferenc
- Rating Change
1719±117 − 129 = 1590±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 1609±64
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- −9 −9 11 2 4
- −132
- 1466±55
- St. Louis, Mike
- 6 2 7 7
- +18
- 1508±36
- King, Michael
- 8 −3 4 8
- −50
- 1560±53
- Tang, Jason
- 3 9 12
- +2
- 1324±39
- Cantor, Bill
- 8 4 9
- −11
- 1697±49
- Lepara, Miralem
- 8 −7 7 7
- +1
- 1240±47
- Mikula, Cyril
- 1 4 3
- St. Louis, Mike
- Rating Change
1448±61 + 53 = 1501±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +41
- 1632±69
- Soti, Ferenc
- 6 2 7 7
- −2*
- 1714±34
- Morris, James R.
- 5 6 5 6
- +8
- 1357±62
- Buckner, James
- 3 5 3 6
- −2*
- 1714±34
- Morris, James R.
- 11 3 −9 8
- +6
- 1353±50
- Connolly, Patrick
- 7 9 8
- +2
- 1268±39
- Schauer, Franz
- 4 3 −9 1
- 0
- 1159±48
- Vays, Lev
- 6 10 6
- Tang, Jason
- Rating Change
1556±63 + 22 = 1578±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1617±70
- Soti, Ferenc
- 3 9 12
- −10
- 1676±47
- Lai, Max
- 8 5 4 5
- +12
- 1512±37
- King, Michael
- 8 −5 9 8
- −6
- 1705±49
- Lepara, Miralem
- 5 6 6
- Torma, Arpad
- Rating Change
1655±173 − 353 = 1302±84 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 949±40
- Barber, Wally
- 6 6 6
- −276
- 1182±44
- Williams, Scott
- 12 −11 9 −7 6
- +1
- 947±57
- Cottingham, Mike
- 5 3 −6 5
- −80
- 1307±39
- Cantor, Bill
- 5 4 −10 2
- 0
- 814±67
- Del Nero, Jeff
- −9 8 12 −9 6
- 0
- 1850±58
- Bryant, Robert
- 4 5 6 4
- 0
- 755±64
- McFadden, Brad
- 3 2 1
- 0
- 2055±68
- Nakada, Mitsutshi
- 2 2 2 2
- 0
- 714±64
- Zaphirio, Ann
- 2 2 6
- Trudell, Robert
- Rating Change
1667±54 − 42 = 1625±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1477±53
- Schaad, Andrew
- 6 4 8
- −26
- 1549±65
- Immaneni, Pramod
- 14 5 −17 7 6
- −13
- 1647±63
- Wang, Jinlin
- −9 10 4 −9 8
- −3
- 1805±47
- Shieh, Michael
- −13 9 −9 10 12
- −1
- 1869±77
- Rubin, David
- 5 8 6 −9 4
- −1
- 1904±51
- Lorenc, Mario
- 7 7 −7 5
- −1
- 1918±56
- Leu, Gia
- 4 6 10 10
- 0
- 2138±63
- Potaychuk, Semen
- 4 9 4 6
- Turberville, Jay
- Rating Change
1552±53 + 3 = 1555±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +28
- 1786±44
- Ma, Mankit
- −9 −10 11 6 5
- −10
- 1625±46
- Kenig, Bill
- −6 9 9 7
- −7
- 1638±46
- Lewis, Ken
- −3 −8 1 16 5
- −4
- 1676±47
- Lai, Max
- 9 5 8
- −2
- 1743±51
- Elhayek, Na Zee
- −7 9 6 7
- −1
- 1761±52
- Chan, Keith
- 5 9 −8 10
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- Rating Change
1533±78 + 52 = 1585±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +47
- 1679±74
- Harrington, John
- 5 8 −5 4 6
- −27
- 1562±66
- Soti, Ferenc
- −9 −9 11 2 4
- +12
- 1463±75
- Flores, Victor
- −7 4 4 8
- −5
- 1714±34
- Morris, James R.
- 2 7 7 −3 6
- +9
- 1446±44
- Pierotti, Joe
- 8 6 10 5
- +7
- 1433±80
- Wong, William
- 7 6 8 5
- +5
- 1410±45
- Manginelli, Andrew
- −10 5 4 4 −10 8
- +2
- 1337±53
- Chang, Chung-Fu
- 5 3 6
- +1
- 1325±40
- Cantor, Bill
- 9 13 4
- 0
- 1240±47
- Mikula, Cyril
- 5 6 9
- 0
- 1066±51
- Redman, Jon
- 6 5 3
- Vays, Lev
- Rating Change
1119±64 + 48 = 1167±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1259±70
- Noguera, Miguel
- 9 2 7 6
- −30
- 1054±70
- Liermann, Brad
- −7 −7 8 8 5
- +28
- 1229±50
- Williams, Scott
- 8 −8 6 8 −7 −9 7
- −5
- 1263±39
- Schauer, Franz
- −9 −9 8 6 9
- +13
- 1133±73
- Magras, Jane
- 4 9 −9 4 5
- −2
- 1343±47
- Connolly, Patrick
- 3 7 8
- +8
- 1079±53
- Redman, Jon
- −8 −7 10 6 8
- 0
- 1500±59
- St. Louis, Mike
- 6 10 6
- +1
- 920±44
- Lisook, Lewis
- 5 4 5
- 0
- 1715±34
- Morris, James R.
- 3 4 8
- Wang, Jinlin
- Rating Change
1655±72 + 17 = 1672±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1634±45
- Trudell, Robert
- −9 10 4 −9 8
- −10
- 1805±47
- Shieh, Michael
- −10 5 7 9
- +4
- 1477±53
- Schaad, Andrew
- 10 −8 5 6
- −3
- 1904±51
- Lorenc, Mario
- 7 4 5
- Welsh, Robert
- Rating Change
1165±64 − 14 = 1151±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1291±50
- Ekbundit, Patrick
- 10 3 7
- −2
- 1404±44
- Manginelli, Andrew
- 7 10 7
- −2
- 1409±49
- Rodich, Mile
- 0 5 6
- Williams, Scott
- Rating Change
1156±60 + 54 = 1210±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +35
- 1453±73
- Au, Peter
- 10 9 −5 9
- −22
- 1129±76
- Score, Tyler
- 9 9 −9 −8 4
- +29
- 1423±105
- Torma, Arpad
- 12 −11 9 −7 6
- −17
- 1143±50
- Vays, Lev
- 8 −8 6 8 −7 −9 7
- +19
- 1255±71
- Noguera, Miguel
- 4 13 6
- −2*
- 1319±40
- Cantor, Bill
- 7 7 9
- +8
- 1124±54
- Oswald, Evan
- −9 9 8 14 −9 7
- −2*
- 1319±40
- Cantor, Bill
- −7 3 −10 5 6
- +4
- 1076±53
- Redman, Jon
- −8 −7 1 −4 7 5 6
- +3
- 1047±61
- Rosenberg, Marvin
- 9 7 −11 8
- Wong, William
- Rating Change
1368±118 + 46 = 1414±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +72
- 1441±55
- Bragau, Petre
- 8 −8 8 −11 9
- −45
- 1440±41
- DeWitt, Mark
- 6 11 4
- +25
- 1343±73
- Haney, Ed
- 6 5 9
- −6
- 1595±61
- Vaksengisser, Volf
- 7 6 8 5
- Zaphirio, Ann
- Rating Change
677±76 + 27 = 704±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 794±66
- McFadden, Brad
- 5 8 11
- −13
- 803±71
- Del Nero, Jeff
- 4 7 2
- −2
- 945±58
- Cottingham, Mike
- 3 3 3
- −2
- 949±40
- Barber, Wally
- 8 2 1
- 0
- 1311±85
- Torma, Arpad
- 2 2 6
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 81. Matches: 299. Club: Phoenix TTC. State: Arizona (AZ). Country: United States (USA). Director: Johnson, Wayne. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 2326. Submitted/revised: 2006-02-26 11:39 pm EST. Last processed: 2023-09-19 10:32 am EDT.