2017 CDTTA Pennant 2501
2017-01-25
Detailed Report
- Aitken, Steven
- Rating Change
1419±41 + 1 = 1420±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1394±48
- Jefimenko, Walter
- −9 −9 9 5 9 −1 4
- −7
- 1468±45
- Datta, Rajib
- 7 8 9 5
- Atalla, Maged
- Rating Change
1053±54 − 11 = 1042±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 959±43
- Puts, Arnold
- 8 5 −8 −2 5 5
- −19
- 1037±39
- Morgan, Shane
- −4 6 3 5 2
- Balsillie, David
- Rating Change
1113±49 − 10 = 1103±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1068±52
- Maclean, Lachlan
- 9 4 10 9
- −20
- 1038±50
- Biddle, Jesse
- −6 6 6 9 7
- Balsillie, Terry
- Rating Change
723±55 − 12 = 711±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 801±52
- Gadd, James
- −6 3 10 7
- −1
- 963±47
- Carter, Benjamin
- 9 10 4
- Biddle, Jesse
- Rating Change
1017±49 + 47 = 1064±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 1124±50
- Balsillie, David
- −6 6 6 9 7
- +22
- 1099±46
- Herweynen, Edward John
- 3 8 −8 8 −11 3
- Bignell, Quentin
- Rating Change
1222±89 − 55 = 1167±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −55
- 1148±41
- Menz, Gary
- −7 −6 7 11 5 −4 7
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- Rating Change
1187±47 − 15 = 1172±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1247±42
- Tang, Swee Yin
- −8 8 −8 −9 4 5 10
- −6
- 1273±42
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- 9 −9 −9 7 −9 6 9
- Brincat, Tony
- Rating Change
1308±42 − 19 = 1289±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1283±41
- Stewart, Craig
- 8 −4 8 5 −5 9
- −7
- 1326±45
- Hayes, Stephen
- 7 −10 9 7 9
- Carter, Benjamin
- Rating Change
952±47 + 12 = 964±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 930±63
- Checkley, Ian
- −7 5 1 7
- +1
- 712±51
- Balsillie, Terry
- 9 10 4
- Carter, Josh
- Rating Change
958±46 + 15 = 973±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 936±43
- Conroy, Mark
- −9 14 −9 7 10
- +4
- 828±61
- Preston, Tanya
- 6 2 9
- Cauchi, Travis
- Rating Change
1302±47 + 21 = 1323±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1297±42
- Nguyen, Hoang David
- 4 −5 7 −4 5 4
- +8
- 1258±44
- Hayes, Simon
- 9 4 7 −4 3
- Checkley, Ian
- Rating Change
928±63 − 18 = 910±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 655±53
- Walsh, Stephen
- 5 −10 6 5
- −20
- 954±46
- Carter, Benjamin
- −7 5 1 7
- Chen, Max
- Rating Change
1419±49 − 5 = 1414±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1345±60
- Evans, Bruce
- 4 −7 8 8 4
- −13
- 1435±50
- Roy, Phillip
- −9 5 −8 3 9 7
- Cheung, Edmond
- Rating Change
1153±45 + 11 = 1164±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1137±65
- Newfield, Pete
- −10 6 −8 9 7 −6 8
- Chew, Chuan
- Rating Change
1214±42 + 0 = 1214±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1199±139
- Qin, Allen
- 7 8 −18 −11 9 10
- −6
- 1294±65
- Ho, Allen
- 4 5 −5 −7 6 8
- Conroy, Mark
- Rating Change
950±46 − 24 = 926±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 927±58
- Robinson, Brian
- 13 7 8
- −10
- 962±45
- Carter, Josh
- −9 14 −9 7 10
- Cung, Robert
- Rating Change
1308±44 + 10 = 1318±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1250±51
- Tagle, Sonny
- 8 −5 8 7 9
- +3
- 1160±48
- Evans, Richard P
- 5 12 7 5
- D’Amico, Scott
- Rating Change
1610±42 − 18 = 1592±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 1523±46
- Foster, Ron
- 9 −3 5 5 −8 4
- −2
- 1788±48
- Lim, Ethan
- 5 6 8 4
- Datta, Rajib
- Rating Change
1465±46 + 12 = 1477±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1427±42
- Aitken, Steven
- 7 8 9 5
- +3
- 1311±43
- Neil, Alan
- 10 6 2 −4 8
- De Bondt, Case
- Rating Change
1565±47 + 8 = 1573±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1532±40
- Sim, Clive
- 9 8 −8 9 6
- −2
- 1789±51
- Lum, Nicholas
- 4 2 8 8
- Ede, Brendan
- Rating Change
1235±55 − 30 = 1205±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −30
- 1084±53
- Newfield, Pete
- 8 8 −9 5 4
- Ede, Paul
- Rating Change
1258±59 − 10 = 1248±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 980±149
- Evans, Emilie
- −9 6 7 12 7
- −13
- 1326±47
- Simons, Shane
- 5 9 −6 4 9
- Evans, Bruce
- Rating Change
1368±70 − 39 = 1329±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −25
- 1382±45
- Smith, Greg
- 12 8 −9 6 6
- −14
- 1405±45
- Chen, Max
- 4 −7 8 8 4
- Evans, Emilie
- Rating Change
1126±214 − 164 = 962±141 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −147
- 1119±46
- Lewis, Peter
- 13 7 6 5
- −17
- 1245±53
- Ede, Paul
- −9 6 7 12 7
- Evans, Richard P
- Rating Change
1165±51 − 9 = 1156±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1307±49
- Martus, Marcus
- 4 −10 7 8 −9 4
- −4
- 1316±44
- Cung, Robert
- 5 12 7 5
- Farrell, Scott
- Rating Change
1162±60 − 36 = 1126±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −26
- 1096±39
- Lum, Lucas
- 6 −9 6 −5 7 1
- −10
- 1168±46
- Martin, Stephane
- 7 12 −5 5 −10 −6 7
- Floyd, Dannie
- Rating Change
800±150 − 102 = 698±117 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −99
- 777±56
- Rooke, Adele
- 8 −9 9 −8 3
- −2
- 1106±67
- Stephens, Mark
- 5 2 −9 −9 3
- Foster, Ron
- Rating Change
1533±54 + 11 = 1544±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1607±40
- D’Amico, Scott
- 9 −3 5 5 −8 4
- −10
- 1611±40
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- 7 −3 −5 10 3 6
- Gadd, James
- Rating Change
796±53 + 15 = 811±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 721±53
- Balsillie, Terry
- −6 3 10 7
- +5
- 679±52
- McGuire, Jonathan
- 9 10 5
- Garner, Grant
- Rating Change
1074±49 + 17 = 1091±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1012±42
- Jones, Cameron
- 10 7 −7 10 9
- +8
- 1007±42
- Perkins, David
- 7 7 5 6
- Gilson, Lynette
- Rating Change
1094±49 − 22 = 1072±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 1101±49
- Pal, Pradeesh
- 7 8 −6 −5 7 2
- −8
- 1131±45
- Noble, Brian
- 5 4 −6 6 9
- Gin, Darian
- Rating Change
1772±57 + 8 = 1780±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1608±42
- Smith, Jakob
- 5 −6 5 9 5
- +4
- 1608±48
- Martin, Alan
- −3 10 9 3 8
- Gormann, Ben
- Rating Change
1277±45 + 24 = 1301±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1292±46
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- 6 6 6 6
- +10
- 1266±45
- Tang, Swee Yin
- 5 10 −8 10 −10 2
- Hanna, Emad
- Rating Change
1111±48 + 12 = 1123±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1055±43
- Morgan, Shane
- 7 7 4 5
- +3
- 957±43
- Puts, Arnold
- 6 8 8 −7 −10 9
- Haughton, Melanie
- Rating Change
1298±45 − 5 = 1293±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1297±42
- Nguyen, Hoang David
- 6 7 11 −6 −7 6
- −17
- 1236±39
- Hayes, Simon
- 3 3 7 9
- Hayes, Simon
- Rating Change
1243±42 + 8 = 1251±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1311±45
- Haughton, Melanie
- 3 3 7 9
- −6
- 1316±48
- Cauchi, Travis
- 9 4 7 −4 3
- Hayes, Stephen
- Rating Change
1314±45 + 23 = 1337±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1318±47
- Maranan, Jesse
- −7 −6 9 8 −13 7 8
- +10
- 1297±36
- Brincat, Tony
- 7 −10 9 7 9
- Herweynen, Edward John
- Rating Change
1087±46 − 5 = 1082±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1071±53
- Maclean, Lachlan
- −7 −4 5 −7 9 8 9
- −16
- 1041±50
- Biddle, Jesse
- 3 8 −8 8 −11 3
- Hewitt, Ged
- Rating Change
1401±48 − 26 = 1375±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −18
- 1340±64
- Walker, Ellen
- 8 5 −8 7 8
- −9
- 1434±50
- Jones, Warren
- 11 −9 −6 9 10 7
- Ho, Allen
- Rating Change
1271±65 + 38 = 1309±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1277±48
- Stepanov, Nick
- 8 −5 10 7 5
- +14
- 1224±45
- Chew, Chuan
- 4 5 −5 −7 6 8
- Jefimenko, Walter
- Rating Change
1386±48 − 4 = 1382±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1314±43
- Neil, Alan
- −7 8 7 8 5
- −12
- 1412±37
- Aitken, Steven
- −9 −9 9 5 9 −1 4
- Jones, Cameron
- Rating Change
1031±46 − 24 = 1007±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 969±52
- Smith, Jared
- −9 7 6 7 −9 4
- −7
- 1084±48
- Garner, Grant
- 10 7 −7 10 9
- Jones, Warren
- Rating Change
1419±50 + 23 = 1442±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1404±42
- Spizzica, Tony
- 2 6 7 −13 −7 4
- +10
- 1381±44
- Hewitt, Ged
- 11 −9 −6 9 10 7
- Kung, Felix
- Rating Change
1603±40 + 1 = 1604±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1565±44
- Menzies, Andrew
- 7 −9 10 4 6
- −6
- 1667±45
- Waterman, Keith
- −10 −10 7 −6 7 4 6
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- Rating Change
1286±46 − 7 = 1279±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1179±44
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- 9 −9 −9 7 −9 6 9
- −13
- 1288±45
- Gormann, Ben
- 6 6 6 6
- Lane, Stephen
- Rating Change
1161±43 + 12 = 1173±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1174±46
- Menz, Gary
- −7 −6 −2 16 8 9 7
- Lewis, Peter
- Rating Change
1122±48 + 4 = 1126±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1036±164
- Evans, Emilie
- 13 7 6 5
- −2
- 1332±48
- Simons, Shane
- 1 8 3 8
- Lim, Denise
- Rating Change
1474±47 + 19 = 1493±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1626±43
- Smith, Jakob
- 6 −5 2 3 4
- −5
- 1599±47
- Martin, Alan
- 3 7 10 12
- Lim, Ethan
- Rating Change
1785±48 + 5 = 1790±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1620±42
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- 6 4 2 −8 −8 4
- +2
- 1595±39
- D’Amico, Scott
- 5 6 8 4
- Lum, Lucas
- Rating Change
1107±42 + 1 = 1108±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1142±46
- Farrell, Scott
- 6 −9 6 −5 7 1
- −11
- 1107±37
- Zwartz, Barney
- −5 −9 6 7 −9 2 9
- Lum, Nicholas
- Rating Change
1787±51 + 4 = 1791±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1610±57
- Sykes, Chris
- 8 4 −5 7 9
- +2
- 1576±47
- De Bondt, Case
- 4 2 8 8
- Maclean, Lachlan
- Rating Change
1090±62 − 38 = 1052±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −24
- 1070±41
- Herweynen, Edward John
- −7 −4 5 −7 9 8 9
- −14
- 1091±43
- Balsillie, David
- 9 4 10 9
- Maksacheff, George
- Rating Change
1629±41 − 2 = 1627±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1563±43
- Menzies, Andrew
- 4 9 10 −8 −7 8
- −8
- 1665±45
- Waterman, Keith
- 9 −9 15 9 −10 7
- Maranan, Jesse
- Rating Change
1305±47 + 1 = 1306±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1308±44
- Stewart, Craig
- −8 9 1 5 4
- −12
- 1326±45
- Hayes, Stephen
- −7 −6 9 8 −13 7 8
- Martin, Alan
- Rating Change
1603±49 + 3 = 1606±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1503±55
- Lim, Denise
- 3 7 10 12
- −4
- 1777±57
- Gin, Darian
- −3 10 9 3 8
- Martin, Stephane
- Rating Change
1158±47 + 21 = 1179±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1137±45
- Farrell, Scott
- 7 12 −5 5 −10 −6 7
- +9
- 1123±38
- Zwartz, Barney
- −10 6 −9 8 8 4
- Martus, Marcus
- Rating Change
1296±49 + 14 = 1310±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1252±51
- Tagle, Sonny
- −3 −8 11 8 6 −11 7
- +4
- 1160±48
- Evans, Richard P
- 4 −10 7 8 −9 4
- Martus, Maria
- Rating Change
885±51 + 50 = 935±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +30
- 1019±43
- Perkins, Shaun
- −9 7 4 −11 3
- +20
- 1014±143
- Morella, Alex
- 9 5 14
- McGuire, Jonathan
- Rating Change
661±54 + 12 = 673±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 674±56
- Walsh, Stephen
- −4 7 −9 10 8
- −6
- 805±52
- Gadd, James
- 9 10 5
- Menz, Gary
- Rating Change
1160±45 + 1 = 1161±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1222±89
- Bignell, Quentin
- −7 −6 7 11 5 −4 7
- −12
- 1161±43
- Lane, Stephen
- −7 −6 −2 16 8 9 7
- Menzies, Andrew
- Rating Change
1575±48 − 20 = 1555±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1596±37
- Kung, Felix
- 7 −9 10 4 6
- −8
- 1621±37
- Maksacheff, George
- 4 9 10 −8 −7 8
- Morella, Alex
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 309 = 891±121 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −276
- 915±56
- Martus, Maria
- 9 5 14
- −33
- 1090±63
- Stephens, Mark
- 7 6 −9 −9 0
- Morgan, Shane
- Rating Change
1044±42 + 4 = 1048±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1062±52
- Atalla, Maged
- −4 6 3 5 2
- −7
- 1115±47
- Hanna, Emad
- 7 7 4 5
- Neil, Alan
- Rating Change
1318±44 − 11 = 1307±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1375±44
- Jefimenko, Walter
- −7 8 7 8 5
- −3
- 1474±45
- Datta, Rajib
- 10 6 2 −4 8
- Newfield, Pete
- Rating Change
1098±59 + 18 = 1116±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1235±55
- Ede, Brendan
- 8 8 −9 5 4
- −14
- 1153±45
- Cheung, Edmond
- −10 6 −8 9 7 −6 8
- Nguyen, Hoang David
- Rating Change
1310±46 − 25 = 1285±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 1282±41
- Haughton, Melanie
- 6 7 11 −6 −7 6
- −10
- 1310±47
- Cauchi, Travis
- 4 −5 7 −4 5 4
- Noble, Brian
- Rating Change
1131±45 + 9 = 1140±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1081±44
- Gilson, Lynette
- 5 4 −6 6 9
- Pal, Pradeesh
- Rating Change
1101±49 + 13 = 1114±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1083±44
- Gilson, Lynette
- 7 8 −6 −5 7 2
- Perkins, David
- Rating Change
1025±46 − 23 = 1002±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 970±52
- Smith, Jared
- 8 3 −6 −8 −8 10 10
- −6
- 1085±48
- Garner, Grant
- 7 7 5 6
- Perkins, Shaun
- Rating Change
1018±43 − 16 = 1002±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 794±59
- Rooke, Adele
- 8 7 5
- −17
- 905±56
- Martus, Maria
- −9 7 4 −11 3
- Preston, Tanya
- Rating Change
815±60 − 1 = 814±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 649±115
- Theis, Ismael
- 6 6 −9 9
- −7
- 970±46
- Carter, Josh
- 6 2 9
- Puts, Arnold
- Rating Change
963±46 − 10 = 953±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1035±49
- Atalla, Maged
- 8 5 −8 −2 5 5
- −3
- 1119±47
- Hanna, Emad
- 6 8 8 −7 −10 9
- Qin, Allen
- Rating Change
1400±200 − 284 = 1116±117 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −234
- 1207±39
- Chew, Chuan
- 7 8 −18 −11 9 10
- −50
- 1254±42
- Stepanov, Nick
- 3 7 4 2
- Robinson, Brian
- Rating Change
925±58 + 23 = 948±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 938±42
- Conroy, Mark
- 13 7 8
- +1
- 668±56
- Walsh, Michael
- 3 2 8
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- Rating Change
1614±42 + 4 = 1618±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1560±62
- Foster, Ron
- 7 −3 −5 10 3 6
- −3
- 1788±48
- Lim, Ethan
- 6 4 2 −8 −8 4
- Rooke, Adele
- Rating Change
779±58 + 10 = 789±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 783±139
- Floyd, Dannie
- 8 −9 9 −8 3
- −3
- 999±39
- Perkins, Shaun
- 8 7 5
- Roy, Phillip
- Rating Change
1422±51 + 28 = 1450±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1428±48
- Chen, Max
- −9 5 −8 3 9 7
- +12
- 1405±48
- Smith, Greg
- 8 −8 8 −9 −9 6 10
- Sim, Clive
- Rating Change
1540±43 − 16 = 1524±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1563±45
- De Bondt, Case
- 9 8 −8 9 6
- −6
- 1592±54
- Sykes, Chris
- 11 6 2 4
- Simons, Shane
- Rating Change
1324±47 + 10 = 1334±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1265±60
- Ede, Paul
- 5 9 −6 4 9
- +2
- 1129±48
- Lewis, Peter
- 1 8 3 8
- Smith, Greg
- Rating Change
1394±49 − 1 = 1393±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1348±61
- Evans, Bruce
- 12 8 −9 6 6
- −11
- 1437±50
- Roy, Phillip
- 8 −8 8 −9 −9 6 10
- Smith, Jakob
- Rating Change
1631±47 − 26 = 1605±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −24
- 1469±44
- Lim, Denise
- 6 −5 2 3 4
- −3
- 1776±57
- Gin, Darian
- 5 −6 5 9 5
- Smith, Jared
- Rating Change
945±52 + 45 = 990±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1021±42
- Jones, Cameron
- −9 7 6 7 −9 4
- +21
- 1016±42
- Perkins, David
- 8 3 −6 −8 −8 10 10
- Spizzica, Tony
- Rating Change
1424±48 − 27 = 1397±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −18
- 1336±63
- Walker, Ellen
- 5 7 −6 7 8
- −9
- 1432±50
- Jones, Warren
- 2 6 7 −13 −7 4
- Stepanov, Nick
- Rating Change
1266±46 − 6 = 1260±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1171±136
- Qin, Allen
- 3 7 4 2
- −11
- 1287±64
- Ho, Allen
- 8 −5 10 7 5
- Stephens, Mark
- Rating Change
1087±63 + 6 = 1093±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 904±135
- Morella, Alex
- 7 6 −9 −9 0
- +1
- 702±119
- Floyd, Dannie
- 5 2 −9 −9 3
- Stewart, Craig
- Rating Change
1294±44 + 0 = 1294±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1298±37
- Brincat, Tony
- 8 −4 8 5 −5 9
- −12
- 1292±44
- Maranan, Jesse
- −8 9 1 5 4
- Sykes, Chris
- Rating Change
1597±58 + 7 = 1604±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1530±39
- Sim, Clive
- 11 6 2 4
- −5
- 1788±51
- Lum, Nicholas
- 8 4 −5 7 9
- Tagle, Sonny
- Rating Change
1265±55 − 25 = 1240±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 1300±49
- Martus, Marcus
- −3 −8 11 8 6 −11 7
- −10
- 1311±44
- Cung, Robert
- 8 −5 8 7 9
- Tang, Swee Yin
- Rating Change
1259±46 − 4 = 1255±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1180±44
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- −8 8 −8 −9 4 5 10
- −11
- 1290±45
- Gormann, Ben
- 5 10 −8 10 −10 2
- Theis, Ismael
- Rating Change
800±150 − 176 = 624±104 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −152
- 646±55
- Walsh, Michael
- 6 9 9
- −23
- 808±56
- Preston, Tanya
- 6 6 −9 9
- Walker, Ellen
- Rating Change
1302±57 + 68 = 1370±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 1411±42
- Spizzica, Tony
- 5 7 −6 7 8
- +32
- 1389±44
- Hewitt, Ged
- 8 5 −8 7 8
- Walsh, Michael
- Rating Change
647±56 + 17 = 664±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 715±121
- Theis, Ismael
- 6 9 9
- −1
- 949±56
- Robinson, Brian
- 3 2 8
- Walsh, Stephen
- Rating Change
676±57 − 23 = 653±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −21
- 655±52
- McGuire, Jonathan
- −4 7 −9 10 8
- −2
- 908±56
- Checkley, Ian
- 5 −10 6 5
- Waterman, Keith
- Rating Change
1656±46 + 19 = 1675±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1636±41
- Maksacheff, George
- 9 −9 15 9 −10 7
- +8
- 1611±40
- Kung, Felix
- −10 −10 7 −6 7 4 6
- Zwartz, Barney
- Rating Change
1114±39 + 3 = 1117±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1121±45
- Lum, Lucas
- −5 −9 6 7 −9 2 9
- −6
- 1171±47
- Martin, Stephane
- −10 6 −9 8 8 4
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 95. Matches: 92. Club: Croydon and Districts Table Tennis Association. Province: VIC. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bristowe, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 23835. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-10 12:58 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-04-28 11:40 pm EDT.