2017 CDTTA Pennant 0902
2017-02-09
Detailed Report
- Bateman, Colin
- Rating Change
808±35 − 1 = 807±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 805±44
- Trinnie, Mary
- 20 16
- −9
- 769±62
- Liou, Susana
- −12 8 8
- Beatty, Roslyn
- Rating Change
861±53 + 11 = 872±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 775±41
- Markley, Dorothy
- 13 16
- +4
- 713±43
- Searle, Patricia
- 16 21
- Boreham, Ron
- Rating Change
1121±48 + 18 = 1139±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1108±40
- Darko, Carl
- 9 9 −8 5 −8 9
- +4
- 1006±43
- Mendis, Champ
- −9 5 1 7 9
- Bright, Andrew J
- Rating Change
1095±52 − 4 = 1091±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 932±47
- Van Der Walt, Hannes
- 9 6 6 −7 5
- −7
- 1216±107
- Goodridge, Robert
- 8 −8 16 5 8
- Brincat, Tony
- Rating Change
1301±32 − 9 = 1292±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1088±37
- Evans, Shaun
- 9 7 −6 4 11
- −9
- 1232±49
- Lewis, Harley
- 7 8 10 0
- Britton, Joseph
- Rating Change
892±42 − 6 = 886±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 797±36
- Spitzer, Helga
- 12 −21 13
- −12
- 878±55
- Cameron, Robert
- −19 7 18
- Broad, Graham
- Rating Change
698±114 − 45 = 653±101 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −36
- 790±36
- Spitzer, Helga
- 5 6
- −9
- 894±54
- Cameron, Robert
- 1 7
- Broad, Margaret
- Rating Change
654±101 − 20 = 634±96 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 844±50
- Thomas, Margaret
- 5 9
- −8
- 863±40
- Menzies, Ruth
- 9 13
- Browning, Michael
- Rating Change
865±104 − 41 = 824±96 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −38
- 924±39
- Byrne, Jason
- −8 8 6 −7 8 6
- −3
- 1127±59
- Pether, Mark
- 7 2 6 5
- Browning, Trevor
- Rating Change
1211±104 + 41 = 1252±96 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1102±41
- Signor, Dominic
- 4 2 5 0
- +15
- 1079±38
- Roberts, Frank
- 11 7 7 4
- Bryan, Robert
- Rating Change
631±44 − 8 = 623±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 719±42
- Charlesworth, Ellen
- 13 −16 14
- −2
- 800±50
- Salib, Kumiko Kim
- 12 9
- Byrne, Jason
- Rating Change
937±40 − 8 = 929±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 859±102
- Browning, Michael
- −8 8 6 −7 8 6
- −13
- 855±74
- Kirk, Cameron
- 13 10 −6 −10 6 9
- Cameron, Robert
- Rating Change
873±56 + 25 = 898±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 897±42
- Britton, Joseph
- −19 7 18
- +3
- 662±104
- Broad, Graham
- 1 7
- Catungal, Crisanto
- Rating Change
1147±48 + 36 = 1183±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1201±52
- Luccio, Luigi Louie
- 7 −13 −6 5 −7 9 9
- +17
- 1190±66
- Probyn-Smith, Garth
- 9 4 9 5
- Charlesworth, Ellen
- Rating Change
714±43 + 10 = 724±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 629±43
- Bryan, Robert
- 13 −16 14
- +4
- 605±41
- Merry, Ken
- 15 17
- Cochrane, Maureen
- Rating Change
812±40 − 10 = 802±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 838±40
- Harrison, Peter
- −6 7 5 −9 −13 8 4
- −1
- 1028±34
- Morgan, Shane
- 7 3 4 4
- Conway, Hugh
- Rating Change
878±90 − 50 = 828±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 636±99
- Van Veen, Peter
- 1 2 7 4
- −59
- 745±97
- Stanton, Jason
- 5 −11 −11 5 −7 10 9
- Darko, Carl
- Rating Change
1107±40 − 8 = 1099±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 864±68
- Spittles, Paul
- 4 5 3 9
- −9
- 1127±46
- Boreham, Ron
- 9 9 −8 5 −8 9
- David, Thomas
- Rating Change
1295±44 + 0 = 1295±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1154±39
- Haughton, Libby
- 13 3 6 9
- −3
- 1445±39
- Elste, Manfred
- −8 7 −5 9 −5 2 8
- Elste, Manfred
- Rating Change
1443±40 + 5 = 1448±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1298±43
- David, Thomas
- −8 7 −5 9 −5 2 8
- +2
- 1277±36
- Keating, John
- 3 9 6 4
- Evans, Shaun
- Rating Change
1094±38 − 7 = 1087±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1155±40
- Kung, Bernard
- 4 7 10 −11 8
- −1
- 1291±31
- Brincat, Tony
- 9 7 −6 4 11
- Evans, Steve
- Rating Change
1117±40 − 13 = 1104±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1144±58
- Probyn-Smith, Garth
- 7 −9 9 6 8
- −6
- 1172±45
- Luccio, Luigi Louie
- 7 5 8 9
- Falconer, Colin
- Rating Change
747±58 + 18 = 765±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 790±42
- Wakefield, Paul
- 6 −8 −3 7 11 5
- −6
- 913±48
- Wachter, Matt
- 8 5 9 12
- Fly, Graham
- Rating Change
1012±37 − 2 = 1010±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 892±44
- Stockdale, Ian
- 12 −19 20
- −5
- 1093±34
- Roberts, Neil H
- 13 −22 20
- Foster, Sue
- Rating Change
530±48 − 5 = 525±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 707±41
- Searle, Patricia
- 14 16
- −1
- 768±40
- Markley, Dorothy
- 9 20
- Goodridge, Robert
- Rating Change
1205±112 + 36 = 1241±100 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1098±52
- Bright, Andrew J
- 8 −8 16 5 8
- +5
- 947±50
- Kirk, Rick
- 6 8 −11 8 −10 7
- Gormann, Ben
- Rating Change
1276±36 − 10 = 1266±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1287±41
- Waters, Peter
- 9 −3 5 8 9
- −2
- 1438±39
- Stevens, Colin
- 9 11 8 9
- Greive, Roderick
- Rating Change
1165±43 − 18 = 1147±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1152±42
- Jung, Tad
- 11 6 5 9
- −5
- 1245±47
- Parbo, Martin
- 6 9 7 4
- Harris, Lachlan
- Rating Change
1294±48 + 43 = 1337±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +30
- 1460±43
- Stevens, Colin
- 8 9 12 9
- +14
- 1308±42
- Waters, Peter
- 8 −9 3 5 −6 10
- Harrison, Leigh
- Rating Change
1271±43 − 40 = 1231±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −22
- 1119±46
- Signor, Sergio
- −9 9 9 −8 7 7
- −18
- 1146±40
- Lewis, Peter
- 8 7 7 6
- Harrison, Peter
- Rating Change
822±41 + 26 = 848±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 951±56
- Van Der Walt, Hanlie
- 5 5 4 4
- +8
- 811±40
- Cochrane, Maureen
- −6 7 5 −9 −13 8 4
- Haughton, Libby
- Rating Change
1158±40 − 7 = 1151±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1272±36
- Keating, John
- −12 7 4 10 6
- −3
- 1291±42
- David, Thomas
- 13 3 6 9
- Haughton, Melanie
- Rating Change
1320±35 + 5 = 1325±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1261±41
- Powers, Grant
- 13 −10 −10 −12 4 6 7
- 0
- 1697±165
- Tang, Haine
- 8 6 8 −9 5
- Henderson, Ross
- Rating Change
1089±43 − 7 = 1082±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 971±36
- Obersnel, Lesil
- 20 12
- −11
- 1100±35
- Rial, Peter
- 15 8
- Hird, Bruce
- Rating Change
1028±40 + 19 = 1047±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1108±34
- Roberts, Neil H
- 19 −16 17
- +3
- 891±44
- Stockdale, Ian
- 9 14
- Ireland, Graeme
- Rating Change
1183±32 + 9 = 1192±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1229±39
- Marsden, Robert
- 20 −14 16
- +1
- 961±40
- Markov, Louis
- 13 16
- Jung, Tad
- Rating Change
1141±44 + 23 = 1164±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1158±41
- Greive, Roderick
- 11 6 5 9
- +10
- 1132±43
- Nicholls, Anne
- −8 −6 10 −9 8 5 6
- Keating, John
- Rating Change
1273±37 + 2 = 1275±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1155±39
- Haughton, Libby
- −12 7 4 10 6
- −2
- 1446±39
- Elste, Manfred
- 3 9 6 4
- Kirk, Cameron
- Rating Change
858±75 + 42 = 900±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +45
- 943±39
- Byrne, Jason
- 13 10 −6 −10 6 9
- −3
- 1128±59
- Pether, Mark
- 6 11 5 3
- Kirk, Rick
- Rating Change
969±51 − 23 = 946±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −22
- 911±47
- Van Der Walt, Hannes
- −9 9 12 −9 11 −9 7
- −1
- 1236±102
- Goodridge, Robert
- 6 8 −11 8 −10 7
- Kung, Bernard
- Rating Change
1162±41 + 1 = 1163±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1092±38
- Evans, Shaun
- 4 7 10 −11 8
- −6
- 1246±54
- Lewis, Harley
- −8 4 7 −8 8 8
- Lewis, Harley
- Rating Change
1222±49 + 33 = 1255±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1302±31
- Brincat, Tony
- 7 8 10 0
- +9
- 1169±41
- Kung, Bernard
- −8 4 7 −8 8 8
- Lewis, Peter
- Rating Change
1150±41 + 13 = 1163±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1250±41
- Harrison, Leigh
- 8 7 7 6
- −3
- 1285±42
- Smith, Daniel
- 7 −7 13 6 8
- Liou, Susana
- Rating Change
785±68 + 15 = 800±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +30
- 816±34
- Bateman, Colin
- −12 8 8
- −15
- 867±35
- Swatek, Glen
- −14 13 12
- Luccio, Luigi Louie
- Rating Change
1192±52 − 10 = 1182±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1111±38
- Evans, Steve
- 7 5 8 9
- −18
- 1162±51
- Catungal, Crisanto
- 7 −13 −6 5 −7 9 9
- Markley, Dorothy
- Rating Change
774±41 − 5 = 769±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 527±48
- Foster, Sue
- 9 20
- −5
- 865±53
- Beatty, Roslyn
- 13 16
- Markov, Louis
- Rating Change
968±45 − 8 = 960±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1041±50
- Roberts, John Peter
- 13 20
- −1
- 1191±32
- Ireland, Graeme
- 13 16
- Marsden, Robert
- Rating Change
1228±39 − 11 = 1217±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1054±53
- Roberts, John Peter
- 13 6
- −13
- 1183±32
- Ireland, Graeme
- 20 −14 16
- Mendis, Champ
- Rating Change
1002±43 + 0 = 1002±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 872±70
- Spittles, Paul
- 9 7 7 7
- −4
- 1134±45
- Boreham, Ron
- −9 5 1 7 9
- Menzies, Ruth
- Rating Change
868±43 − 3 = 865±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 643±98
- Broad, Margaret
- 9 13
- −5
- 968±61
- Stitzel, Paul
- −13 19 7
- Merry, Ken
- Rating Change
607±42 − 6 = 601±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 720±42
- Charlesworth, Ellen
- 15 17
- −2
- 800±50
- Salib, Kumiko Kim
- −20 14 14
- Morgan, Shane
- Rating Change
1041±35 − 14 = 1027±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 802±38
- Cochrane, Maureen
- 7 3 4 4
- −15
- 900±44
- Van Der Walt, Hanlie
- 8 9 −9 −6 −6 9 11
- Nicholls, Anne
- Rating Change
1137±44 − 15 = 1122±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1155±42
- Jung, Tad
- −8 −6 10 −9 8 5 6
- −4
- 1246±47
- Parbo, Martin
- 4 8 11 2
- Obersnel, Lesil
- Rating Change
964±36 + 4 = 968±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 931±44
- Woodfield, Graham
- −16 9 13
- −3
- 1077±41
- Henderson, Ross
- 20 12
- Parbo, Martin
- Rating Change
1239±47 + 11 = 1250±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1152±41
- Greive, Roderick
- 6 9 7 4
- +5
- 1125±42
- Nicholls, Anne
- 4 8 11 2
- Pether, Mark
- Rating Change
1125±60 + 5 = 1130±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 903±64
- Kirk, Cameron
- 6 11 5 3
- +1
- 831±97
- Browning, Michael
- 7 2 6 5
- Powers, Grant
- Rating Change
1257±42 − 3 = 1254±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1138±72
- Van Ravenstein, Anthony
- −3 −6 9 8 6 8
- −7
- 1320±35
- Haughton, Melanie
- 13 −10 −10 −12 4 6 7
- Prato, Craig
- Rating Change
1274±166 + 11 = 1285±160 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 917±49
- Wachter, Matt
- 5 3 10 8
- +1
- 777±40
- Wakefield, Paul
- 2 7 9 8
- Probyn-Smith, Garth
- Rating Change
1173±68 − 11 = 1162±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1111±38
- Evans, Steve
- 7 −9 9 6 8
- −26
- 1165±52
- Catungal, Crisanto
- 9 4 9 5
- Psaila, Anthony
- Rating Change
1180±57 − 20 = 1160±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1080±39
- Roberts, Frank
- −9 −9 7 10 6 5
- −29
- 1081±41
- Signor, Dominic
- 6 −6 −7 4 4 −7 6
- Rial, Peter
- Rating Change
1099±35 + 9 = 1108±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1093±42
- Henderson, Ross
- 15 8
- +1
- 924±42
- Woodfield, Graham
- 11 17
- Roberts, Frank
- Rating Change
1084±39 − 9 = 1075±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1152±48
- Psaila, Anthony
- −9 −9 7 10 6 5
- −3
- 1234±99
- Browning, Trevor
- 11 7 7 4
- Roberts, John Peter
- Rating Change
1045±53 + 4 = 1049±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 966±43
- Markov, Louis
- 13 20
- −4
- 1215±37
- Marsden, Robert
- 13 6
- Roberts, Neil H
- Rating Change
1105±35 − 8 = 1097±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1015±36
- Fly, Graham
- 13 −22 20
- −12
- 1030±40
- Hird, Bruce
- 19 −16 17
- Salib, Kumiko Kim
- Rating Change
797±50 + 5 = 802±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 625±42
- Bryan, Robert
- 12 9
- +2
- 603±40
- Merry, Ken
- −20 14 14
- Searle, Patricia
- Rating Change
711±43 − 1 = 710±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 528±48
- Foster, Sue
- 14 16
- −3
- 869±53
- Beatty, Roslyn
- 16 21
- Signor, Dominic
- Rating Change
1085±42 + 14 = 1099±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1188±57
- Psaila, Anthony
- 6 −6 −7 4 4 −7 6
- −4
- 1234±99
- Browning, Trevor
- 4 2 5 0
- Signor, Sergio
- Rating Change
1123±48 + 20 = 1143±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1250±41
- Harrison, Leigh
- −9 9 9 −8 7 7
- −4
- 1286±42
- Smith, Daniel
- −5 −10 3 −11 9 7 8
- Smith, Daniel
- Rating Change
1283±43 + 8 = 1291±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1168±41
- Lewis, Peter
- 7 −7 13 6 8
- +3
- 1151±52
- Signor, Sergio
- −5 −10 3 −11 9 7 8
- Spittles, Paul
- Rating Change
876±72 − 15 = 861±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 998±42
- Mendis, Champ
- 9 7 7 7
- −3
- 1098±38
- Darko, Carl
- 4 5 3 9
- Spitzer, Helga
- Rating Change
793±37 + 0 = 793±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 678±108
- Broad, Graham
- 5 6
- −4
- 880±40
- Britton, Joseph
- 12 −21 13
- Stanton, Jason
- Rating Change
792±114 + 26 = 818±83 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +72
- 887±88
- Conway, Hugh
- 5 −11 −11 5 −7 10 9
- −46
- 847±49
- Thorogood, Dylan
- 7 2 5 −9 4
- Stevens, Colin
- Rating Change
1458±43 − 17 = 1441±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1268±35
- Gormann, Ben
- 9 11 8 9
- −20
- 1308±47
- Harris, Lachlan
- 8 9 12 9
- Stitzel, Paul
- Rating Change
960±60 + 17 = 977±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 870±42
- Menzies, Ruth
- −13 19 7
- +8
- 855±52
- Thomas, Margaret
- 14 15
- Stockdale, Ian
- Rating Change
896±45 − 8 = 888±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1008±36
- Fly, Graham
- 12 −19 20
- −3
- 1044±44
- Hird, Bruce
- 9 14
- Swatek, Glen
- Rating Change
861±35 + 10 = 871±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 816±65
- Liou, Susana
- −14 13 12
- +5
- 801±44
- Trinnie, Mary
- 11 15
- Tang, Haine
- Rating Change
1697±166 + 7 = 1704±162 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1325±34
- Haughton, Melanie
- 8 6 8 −9 5
- +1
- 1127±69
- Van Ravenstein, Anthony
- 8 5 8 7
- Thomas, Margaret
- Rating Change
852±52 − 4 = 848±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 645±98
- Broad, Margaret
- 5 9
- −7
- 969±61
- Stitzel, Paul
- 14 15
- Thorogood, Dylan
- Rating Change
845±49 + 15 = 860±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 871±100
- Stanton, Jason
- 7 2 5 −9 4
- +2
- 638±100
- Van Veen, Peter
- 4 2 5 5
- Trinnie, Mary
- Rating Change
815±46 − 23 = 792±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 800±34
- Bateman, Colin
- 20 16
- −8
- 865±35
- Swatek, Glen
- 11 15
- Van Der Walt, Hanlie
- Rating Change
923±49 + 1 = 924±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1042±35
- Morgan, Shane
- 8 9 −9 −6 −6 9 11
- −22
- 831±39
- Harrison, Peter
- 5 5 4 4
- Van Der Walt, Hannes
- Rating Change
914±48 + 15 = 929±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 966±51
- Kirk, Rick
- −9 9 12 −9 11 −9 7
- −3
- 1088±47
- Bright, Andrew J
- 9 6 6 −7 5
- Van Ravenstein, Anthony
- Rating Change
1139±72 − 13 = 1126±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1250±40
- Powers, Grant
- −3 −6 9 8 6 8
- 0
- 1703±163
- Tang, Haine
- 8 5 8 7
- Van Veen, Peter
- Rating Change
649±104 − 24 = 625±97 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 831±78
- Conway, Hugh
- 1 2 7 4
- −9
- 853±51
- Thorogood, Dylan
- 4 2 5 5
- Wachter, Matt
- Rating Change
914±49 + 3 = 917±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 773±60
- Falconer, Colin
- 8 5 9 12
- −1
- 1276±165
- Prato, Craig
- 5 3 10 8
- Wakefield, Paul
- Rating Change
790±42 − 14 = 776±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 741±55
- Falconer, Colin
- 6 −8 −3 7 11 5
- 0
- 1284±161
- Prato, Craig
- 2 7 9 8
- Waters, Peter
- Rating Change
1298±43 + 0 = 1298±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1274±36
- Gormann, Ben
- 9 −3 5 8 9
- −10
- 1323±51
- Harris, Lachlan
- 8 −9 3 5 −6 10
- Woodfield, Graham
- Rating Change
934±45 − 13 = 921±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 961±36
- Obersnel, Lesil
- −16 9 13
- −2
- 1106±34
- Rial, Peter
- 11 17
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 88. Matches: 88. Club: Croydon and Districts Table Tennis Association. Province: VIC. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bristowe, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 23930. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-10 12:58 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-04-28 11:40 pm EDT.