Round 6 | Coburg TTC Summer Pennant
2017-03-14
Detailed Report
- Ai, Belinda
- Rating Change
1424±29 − 9 = 1415±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1450±42
- Morrison, Andrew
- 8 −10 7 4
- −4
- 1460±42
- King, Francis
- −8 9 9 7
- Anstey, Luke
- Rating Change
1428±44 + 5 = 1433±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1476±45
- Morrison, Andrew
- −4 6 −6 8 3
- −10
- 1460±42
- King, Francis
- 5 8 −11 −7 3
- Anstey, Zachary
- Rating Change
1745±31 + 14 = 1759±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1765±36
- Tran, Alex
- −7 9 4 −10 2
- +6
- 1751±36
- Truong, Edward
- 4 9 −12 7
- Antonovich, Louise
- Rating Change
1119±49 + 6 = 1125±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1232±52
- Black, Paul
- 4 8 −9 −8 10
- −17
- 1093±47
- Lin, Hao Jin
- 3 −8 −12 7 5
- Apap, Jarryd
- Rating Change
1253±32 − 8 = 1245±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1299±41
- Chen, Rocky
- 11 −8 −10 4 9
- −3
- 1339±50
- Ngo, Brandon
- 10 10 −7 8
- Auchterlonie, Allan
- Rating Change
1372±47 − 27 = 1345±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 1327±36
- Donlon, Michael
- 8 3 4
- −10
- 1347±42
- Khan, Zafar Shah
- 6 5 11
- Bartone, Nick
- Rating Change
1434±59 − 12 = 1422±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1537±35
- Kumar, David
- −9 9 8 6
- −3
- 1630±35
- Ghafoor, Abdul
- 7 5 9
- Baulch, Bruce
- Rating Change
1202±41 − 8 = 1194±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1302±41
- Chen, Rocky
- 5 7 −10 4
- −3
- 1343±50
- Ngo, Brandon
- 7 11 6
- Bertoncello, Michael
- Rating Change
1340±40 + 7 = 1347±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1276±41
- Menegol, Elio
- −9 9 12 5
- −3
- 1505±62
- Watson, Paul G
- 3 11 6
- +2
- 1191±34
- Menegol, Edward
- −11 7 8 5
- +1
- 1093±54
- Watson, Stephen
- 3 −6 3 9
- Bisiach, Lory
- Rating Change
1690±50 + 11 = 1701±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1643±38
- Blythman, Luke
- −11 9 6 −9 9
- 0
- 2039±40
- Huang, Sida Eric
- 6 8 4
- Black, Paul
- Rating Change
1228±53 − 22 = 1206±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1077±34
- Warren, Derek
- 5 11 12
- −26
- 1105±45
- Antonovich, Louise
- 4 8 −9 −8 10
- Blythman, Luke
- Rating Change
1631±39 + 6 = 1637±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1671±39
- Kilderry, Jim
- 4 6 −8 4
- −6
- 1690±50
- Bisiach, Lory
- −11 9 6 −9 9
- Bouchaud, Jack
- Rating Change
1729±34 + 5 = 1734±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1613±41
- Griffiths, John
- 8 −9 7 7
- +2
- 1579±44
- Huynh, Leanne
- −8 7 6 7
- Bui, Thang Duc
- Rating Change
1655±46 + 11 = 1666±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1590±31
- Jackson, Ben
- 9 −6 8 3
- +3
- 1505±35
- Champion, Jamie
- 9 7 9
- Carbonaro, Claude
- Rating Change
1095±45 − 6 = 1089±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1221±52
- Hassan, Dib
- 2 6 −10 10
- −2
- 1306±57
- Hassan, Mohammad
- 10 13 5
- Carless, Neil
- Rating Change
1470±82 + 24 = 1494±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1409±79
- Moloney, David
- 9 5 8
- 0
- 1069±53
- Gould, Leslie
- 2 3 −9 5
- Carter, Craig
- Rating Change
1912±45 + 6 = 1918±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1758±35
- Tran, Alex
- 11 −6 5 7
- +3
- 1744±35
- Truong, Edward
- 7 3 10
- Champion, Jamie
- Rating Change
1505±36 − 1 = 1504±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1355±65
- Welch, Robert
- 5 5 12
- −2
- 1663±45
- Bui, Thang Duc
- 9 7 9
- 0
- 1156±81
- Yuan, Randong Ben
- 5 8 3
- −2
- 1669±31
- Truong, Hai Ba
- 8 2 7
- Chau, Raymond
- Rating Change
910±115 − 21 = 889±109 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1144±52
- Zaidi, Ali Abbas
- 7 5 5
- −10
- 1148±82
- Yuan, Randong Ben
- −11 5 3 2
- Chen, Rocky
- Rating Change
1294±41 + 12 = 1306±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1250±31
- Apap, Jarryd
- 11 −8 −10 4 9
- +4
- 1198±40
- Baulch, Bruce
- 5 7 −10 4
- Chilcott, Mark
- Rating Change
1368±59 + 10 = 1378±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1242±45
- Wong, James
- −6 4 −8 4 5
- +2
- 1151±53
- Lim, Hai San
- 4 6 −9 3
- Di Vita, Zino
- Rating Change
1297±44 + 28 = 1325±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1577±79
- Watson, Paul G
- 11 7 7
- +1
- 1095±54
- Watson, Stephen
- −8 3 5 7
- Donlon, Michael
- Rating Change
1335±37 + 3 = 1338±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1358±40
- Auchterlonie, Allan
- 8 3 4
- −8
- 1356±39
- Zammit, Brian
- 5 5 −3 1
- Erdal, Ken
- Rating Change
1653±43 + 9 = 1662±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1569±32
- Roy, Stephen
- 11 8 4
- +3
- 1514±30
- Stuart, Clinton
- −8 −3 4 1 7
- Finlayson, Mark
- Rating Change
928±60 − 7 = 921±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1063±55
- Gould, Leslie
- 5 −6 8 −11 7
- Fitzgerald, Paul
- Rating Change
1608±43 − 3 = 1605±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1545±36
- Kumar, David
- 6 6 −13 4
- −11
- 1624±35
- Ghafoor, Abdul
- 9 −9 5 8
- Fusca, Joseph
- Rating Change
1291±47 + 10 = 1301±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1194±41
- Jones, Chrissy
- 12 6 −6 8
- +4
- 1160±33
- Mulcahy, Margaret
- 7 6 −7 3
- Ghafoor, Abdul
- Rating Change
1622±35 + 9 = 1631±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1615±42
- Fitzgerald, Paul
- 9 −9 5 8
- +1
- 1425±57
- Bartone, Nick
- 7 5 9
- Glanville, Matthew
- Rating Change
1340±33 − 9 = 1331±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1299±54
- Rodgers, David
- 5 16 7
- −1
- 1666±165
- Liu, Zhuan
- 8 4 6
- Gleich, Garry
- Rating Change
866±63 − 1 = 865±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −1
- 1226±50
- Hassan, Dib
- 6 2 6
- 0
- 1308±56
- Hassan, Mohammad
- 4 2 6
- Gould, Leslie
- Rating Change
1063±55 + 6 = 1069±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 928±60
- Finlayson, Mark
- 5 −6 8 −11 7
- 0
- 1488±78
- Carless, Neil
- 2 3 −9 5
- Griffiths, John
- Rating Change
1627±48 − 19 = 1608±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 1615±34
- Lim, Christopher
- 9 11 −9 −9 5
- −4
- 1731±34
- Bouchaud, Jack
- 8 −9 7 7
- Hassan, Dib
- Rating Change
1220±52 + 6 = 1226±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1093±44
- Carbonaro, Claude
- 2 6 −10 10
- 0
- 866±63
- Gleich, Garry
- 6 2 6
- Hassan, Mohammad
- Rating Change
1305±57 + 3 = 1308±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1090±44
- Carbonaro, Claude
- 10 13 5
- 0
- 865±63
- Gleich, Garry
- 4 2 6
- Houron, Pascal
- Rating Change
1927±59 − 6 = 1921±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1852±43
- Liao, Xiao Hua
- 12 −9 −9 8 4
- −18
- 1945±54
- Meng, Ying Maggie
- 9 −7 9 4
- Huang, Michael
- Rating Change
1935±53 + 11 = 1946±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1822±33
- Huynh, Be Phu
- 7 −10 −7 7 12
- +4
- 1796±40
- Zirak, Kouros
- 11 5 4
- Huang, Sida Eric
- Rating Change
2039±40 + 0 = 2039±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1701±48
- Bisiach, Lory
- 6 8 4
- 0
- 1659±38
- Kilderry, Jim
- 8 −6 2 5
- Huynh, Be Phu
- Rating Change
1835±35 − 15 = 1820±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1741±46
- Trinh, Danny
- 8 −6 −4 9 12
- −3
- 1941±52
- Huang, Michael
- 7 −10 −7 7 12
- Huynh, Leanne
- Rating Change
1560±45 + 16 = 1576±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1635±35
- Lim, Christopher
- 6 8 7
- −3
- 1733±33
- Bouchaud, Jack
- −8 7 6 7
- Ibrahim, Onsy
- Rating Change
817±72 − 18 = 799±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −18
- 882±72
- Lay, Daisy
- −10 4 4 3
- 0
- 1413±117
- Sasic, Duro
- 6 0 6
- Jackson, Ben
- Rating Change
1594±31 − 8 = 1586±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1658±46
- Bui, Thang Duc
- 9 −6 8 3
- −3
- 1667±31
- Truong, Hai Ba
- 5 3 5
- Jones, Chrissy
- Rating Change
1175±35 + 13 = 1188±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1247±48
- Sheikh, Ilyas
- −4 11 5 9
- −3
- 1296±47
- Fusca, Joseph
- 12 6 −6 8
- +6
- 1167±58
- Lim, Hai San
- 6 7 −11 9
- Khan, Zafar Shah
- Rating Change
1360±45 − 1 = 1359±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1356±40
- Auchterlonie, Allan
- 6 5 11
- −13
- 1355±39
- Zammit, Brian
- 8 5 −11 7
- Kilderry, Jim
- Rating Change
1671±39 − 13 = 1658±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1624±38
- Blythman, Luke
- 4 6 −8 4
- 0
- 2039±40
- Huang, Sida Eric
- 8 −6 2 5
- King, Francis
- Rating Change
1450±43 + 20 = 1470±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1443±42
- Anstey, Luke
- 5 8 −11 −7 3
- +8
- 1419±29
- Ai, Belinda
- −8 9 9 7
- Klapcic, Nino
- Rating Change
1376±62 + 4 = 1380±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1187±34
- Tweed, David
- 4 −9 9 5
- 0
- 994±35
- Newman, Donna
- 7 3 8
- Kredinac, Mike
- Rating Change
1382±48 − 4 = 1378±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1295±41
- Slingo, Martin
- 7 −9 −7 4 11
- −10
- 1433±44
- Sheppard, Mark
- 10 5 6
- Kumar, David
- Rating Change
1542±36 − 3 = 1539±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1430±58
- Bartone, Nick
- −9 9 8 6
- −6
- 1597±41
- Fitzgerald, Paul
- 6 6 −13 4
- Larsen, Paul
- Rating Change
1232±45 − 1 = 1231±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1194±34
- Menegol, Edward
- 2 −5 3 7
- −10
- 1260±41
- Menegol, Elio
- −3 −7 13 10 3
- Lay, Daisy
- Rating Change
882±72 + 19 = 901±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 817±71
- Ibrahim, Onsy
- −10 4 4 3
- Liao, Xiao Hua
- Rating Change
1878±45 − 33 = 1845±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −26
- 1676±40
- Strubbe, Kristofer
- 4 5 5
- −8
- 1908±55
- Houron, Pascal
- 12 −9 −9 8 4
- Lim, Christopher
- Rating Change
1627±36 − 4 = 1623±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1620±43
- Griffiths, John
- 9 11 −9 −9 5
- −12
- 1557±43
- Huynh, Leanne
- 6 8 7
- Lim, Hai San
- Rating Change
1173±62 − 24 = 1149±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −21
- 1182±34
- Jones, Chrissy
- 6 7 −11 9
- −2
- 1375±58
- Chilcott, Mark
- 4 6 −9 3
- Lin, Hao Jin
- Rating Change
1114±53 − 3 = 1111±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1144±50
- Antonovich, Louise
- 3 −8 −12 7 5
- −22
- 1066±34
- Warren, Derek
- −8 −9 2 1 6
- Liu, Zhuan
- Rating Change
1600±200 + 78 = 1678±159 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +67
- 1427±43
- Marchant, Phillip
- 5 −9 5 7
- +11
- 1332±32
- Glanville, Matthew
- 8 4 6
- Loong, Jason
- Rating Change
1423±50 + 38 = 1461±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1493±57
- Smith, Phil
- 8 8 −9 7
- +17
- 1453±40
- Persic, Ivo
- −5 14 9 8
- Marchant, Phillip
- Rating Change
1423±43 + 3 = 1426±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1330±52
- Rodgers, David
- 6 −3 9 −9 8
- −3
- 1642±174
- Liu, Zhuan
- 5 −9 5 7
- Menegol, Edward
- Rating Change
1197±34 − 9 = 1188±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1222±43
- Larsen, Paul
- 2 −5 3 7
- −2
- 1345±39
- Bertoncello, Michael
- −11 7 8 5
- Menegol, Elio
- Rating Change
1267±42 + 3 = 1270±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1242±43
- Larsen, Paul
- −3 −7 13 10 3
- −6
- 1343±39
- Bertoncello, Michael
- −9 9 12 5
- Meng, Ying Maggie
- Rating Change
1944±54 + 17 = 1961±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1942±57
- Houron, Pascal
- 9 −7 9 4
- +1
- 1699±42
- Strubbe, Kristofer
- 7 6 3
- Moloney, David
- Rating Change
1365±81 + 22 = 1387±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +40
- 1435±87
- Wallace, Tobias Toby
- 6 10 8
- −18
- 1471±82
- Carless, Neil
- 9 5 8
- Morrison, Andrew
- Rating Change
1466±46 − 7 = 1459±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1419±28
- Ai, Belinda
- 8 −10 7 4
- −17
- 1417±42
- Anstey, Luke
- −4 6 −6 8 3
- Mulcahy, Margaret
- Rating Change
1164±34 − 7 = 1157±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1220±43
- Sheikh, Ilyas
- 8 −6 9 2
- −2
- 1296±47
- Fusca, Joseph
- 7 6 −7 3
- Newman, Donna
- Rating Change
997±36 − 3 = 994±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1093±48
- Osman, Suat
- 9 8 −8 4
- 0
- 1380±61
- Klapcic, Nino
- 7 3 8
- Ngo, Brandon
- Rating Change
1335±50 + 11 = 1346±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1248±31
- Apap, Jarryd
- 10 10 −7 8
- +4
- 1197±40
- Baulch, Bruce
- 7 11 6
- Osman, Suat
- Rating Change
1101±50 − 2 = 1099±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 997±36
- Newman, Donna
- 9 8 −8 4
- −8
- 1182±34
- Tweed, David
- −5 4 −4 9 8
- Persic, Ivo
- Rating Change
1462±45 − 20 = 1442±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1442±51
- Loong, Jason
- −5 14 9 8
- −7
- 1500±44
- Stuart, Glenn
- −8 9 6 7
- Riquelme, Hugo
- Rating Change
1155±59 − 12 = 1143±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1230±45
- Wong, James
- 3 9 −3 2
- Rodgers, David
- Rating Change
1307±56 + 15 = 1322±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1339±32
- Glanville, Matthew
- 5 16 7
- −8
- 1420±42
- Marchant, Phillip
- 6 −3 9 −9 8
- Roy, Stephen
- Rating Change
1560±32 + 6 = 1566±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1616±34
- Scott, John
- 9 −10 6 11
- −3
- 1657±43
- Erdal, Ken
- 11 8 4
- Sasic, Duro
- Rating Change
1363±121 + 50 = 1413±117 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +50
- 1400±200
- Zhang, John
- 4 −11 9 8
- 0
- 799±67
- Ibrahim, Onsy
- 6 0 6
- Scott, John
- Rating Change
1612±35 − 7 = 1605±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1515±31
- Stuart, Clinton
- 5 −9 −9 8 7
- −11
- 1557±31
- Roy, Stephen
- 9 −10 6 11
- Shannon, Mick
- Rating Change
905±71 + 0 = 905±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1386±78
- Wallace, Tobias Toby
- 5 8 6
- Sheikh, Ilyas
- Rating Change
1240±48 − 12 = 1228±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1162±33
- Mulcahy, Margaret
- 8 −6 9 2
- −19
- 1178±33
- Jones, Chrissy
- −4 11 5 9
- Sheppard, Mark
- Rating Change
1426±45 + 16 = 1442±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1390±48
- Kredinac, Mike
- 10 5 6
- +6
- 1354±27
- Stiles, Charles
- 7 9 −7 5
- Slingo, Martin
- Rating Change
1303±42 − 14 = 1289±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1347±27
- Stiles, Charles
- 6 3 7
- −6
- 1371±44
- Kredinac, Mike
- 7 −9 −7 4 11
- Smith, Phil
- Rating Change
1466±59 + 4 = 1470±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1528±50
- Stuart, Glenn
- 13 5 10
- −23
- 1442±51
- Loong, Jason
- 8 8 −9 7
- Stiles, Charles
- Rating Change
1350±28 + 1 = 1351±27 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1297±41
- Slingo, Martin
- 6 3 7
- −3
- 1435±44
- Sheppard, Mark
- 7 9 −7 5
- Strubbe, Kristofer
- Rating Change
1677±40 + 21 = 1698±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1869±43
- Liao, Xiao Hua
- 4 5 5
- −1
- 1959±54
- Meng, Ying Maggie
- 7 6 3
- Stuart, Clinton
- Rating Change
1517±32 − 5 = 1512±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 1601±33
- Scott, John
- 5 −9 −9 8 7
- −2
- 1659±43
- Erdal, Ken
- −8 −3 4 1 7
- Stuart, Glenn
- Rating Change
1518±50 − 12 = 1506±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1447±39
- Persic, Ivo
- −8 9 6 7
- −20
- 1442±53
- Smith, Phil
- 13 5 10
- Taranto, Damian
- Rating Change
1212±51 − 6 = 1206±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1339±62
- Welch, Robert
- 8 6 5
- Tran, Alex
- Rating Change
1768±36 − 12 = 1756±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1752±31
- Anstey, Zachary
- −7 9 4 −10 2
- −2
- 1915±45
- Carter, Craig
- 11 −6 5 7
- Trinh, Danny
- Rating Change
1719±47 + 43 = 1762±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1832±34
- Huynh, Be Phu
- 8 −6 −4 9 12
- +19
- 1809±40
- Zirak, Kouros
- −8 8 12 −5 8
- Truong, Edward
- Rating Change
1754±37 − 11 = 1743±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1752±31
- Anstey, Zachary
- 4 9 −12 7
- −2
- 1916±45
- Carter, Craig
- 7 3 10
- Truong, Hai Ba
- Rating Change
1665±31 + 5 = 1670±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1590±31
- Jackson, Ben
- 5 3 5
- +1
- 1505±35
- Champion, Jamie
- 8 2 7
- Tweed, David
- Rating Change
1183±35 + 3 = 1186±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1108±48
- Osman, Suat
- −5 4 −4 9 8
- −1
- 1376±62
- Klapcic, Nino
- 4 −9 9 5
- Wallace, Tobias Toby
- Rating Change
1435±87 − 54 = 1381±77 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 905±71
- Shannon, Mick
- 5 8 6
- −54
- 1347±74
- Moloney, David
- 6 10 8
- Warren, Derek
- Rating Change
1068±34 + 7 = 1075±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1131±53
- Lin, Hao Jin
- −8 −9 2 1 6
- −2
- 1203±45
- Black, Paul
- 5 11 12
- Watson, Paul G
- Rating Change
1573±80 − 62 = 1511±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1349±39
- Bertoncello, Michael
- 3 11 6
- −68
- 1299±43
- Di Vita, Zino
- 11 7 7
- Watson, Stephen
- Rating Change
1096±55 − 3 = 1093±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 1323±45
- Di Vita, Zino
- −8 3 5 7
- −1
- 1347±38
- Bertoncello, Michael
- 3 −6 3 9
- Welch, Robert
- Rating Change
1346±66 + 1 = 1347±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1212±51
- Taranto, Damian
- 8 6 5
- −8
- 1501±35
- Champion, Jamie
- 5 5 12
- Wong, James
- Rating Change
1235±46 + 3 = 1238±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1155±59
- Riquelme, Hugo
- 3 9 −3 2
- −4
- 1372±59
- Chilcott, Mark
- −6 4 −8 4 5
- Yuan, Randong Ben
- Rating Change
1149±83 + 5 = 1154±80 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 898±111
- Chau, Raymond
- −11 5 3 2
- −1
- 1503±35
- Champion, Jamie
- 5 8 3
- Zaidi, Ali Abbas
- Rating Change
1144±52 + 2 = 1146±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 898±112
- Chau, Raymond
- 7 5 5
- Zammit, Brian
- Rating Change
1345±40 + 21 = 1366±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1374±44
- Khan, Zafar Shah
- 8 5 −11 7
- +9
- 1346±36
- Donlon, Michael
- 5 5 −3 1
- Zhang, John
- Rating Change
1400±200 − 136 = 1264±157 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −136
- 1363±121
- Sasic, Duro
- 4 −11 9 8
- Zirak, Kouros
- Rating Change
1813±41 − 18 = 1795±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 1744±46
- Trinh, Danny
- −8 8 12 −5 8
- −3
- 1942±52
- Huang, Michael
- 11 5 4
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 98. Matches: 97. Club: Coburg Table Tennis Club. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Anstey, Zachary. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 24422. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-09 1:28 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-04-28 11:40 pm EDT.