2017 CDTTA Pennant 2903
2017-03-29
Detailed Report
- Atalla, Maged
- Rating Change
958±38 + 26 = 984±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1041±43
- Smith, Jared
- 6 5 −8 −9 4 6
- +12
- 1018±39
- Hunt, Mark
- 11 −5 9 −7 7 9
- Balsillie, David
- Rating Change
1122±38 − 23 = 1099±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 1027±30
- Noble, Brian
- 7 −9 15 −8 3 5
- −8
- 1109±36
- Pal, Pradeesh
- 5 6 −7 −11 7 5
- Balsillie, Terry
- Rating Change
692±44 − 1 = 691±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −1
- 996±56
- Morella, Alex
- 5 7 6
- 0
- 1009±34
- Perkins, Shaun
- 4 2 9
- Biddle, Jesse
- Rating Change
1108±44 + 21 = 1129±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1118±36
- Garner, Grant
- −6 9 −6 −7 7 7 10
- +9
- 1071±38
- Gilson, Lynette
- −13 6 14 7 −2 −9 1
- Bignell, Quentin
- Rating Change
1115±38 − 9 = 1106±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1172±33
- Newfield, Pete
- 8 7 11 7
- −3
- 1216±34
- Lum, Lucas
- 10 −7 7 −11 8 4
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- Rating Change
1185±38 + 9 = 1194±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1288±58
- Ho, Allen
- 7 9 −2 −7 6 −11 2
- −4
- 1284±39
- Stepanov, Nick
- 5 10 6 4
- Brincat, Tony
- Rating Change
1289±30 + 2 = 1291±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1308±39
- Martus, Marcus
- 5 7 5 2
- −5
- 1325±34
- Cung, Robert
- 9 9 9 −2 2
- Browning, Trevor
- Rating Change
1235±56 − 20 = 1215±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1294±35
- Burns, Justin
- −6 9 4 −5 8 7
- −7
- 1324±37
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- 10 9 −8 8 6
- Burns, Justin
- Rating Change
1290±36 + 9 = 1299±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1235±39
- Ede, Paul
- 7 −5 10 −10 −5 6 8
- +4
- 1226±52
- Browning, Trevor
- −6 9 4 −5 8 7
- Carter, Benjamin
- Rating Change
956±39 − 6 = 950±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 768±41
- Preston, Tanya
- −10 −9 5 9 8
- −8
- 995±47
- Conroy, Mark
- −9 2 5 −9 6
- Carter, Josh
- Rating Change
923±40 − 3 = 920±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 861±97
- Garratt, Bruce
- −9 7 3 8
- −9
- 941±48
- Martus, Maria
- 10 8 11
- Cauchi, Travis
- Rating Change
1316±35 − 5 = 1311±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1256±36
- Hayes, Stephen
- 10 5 4 6
- −10
- 1276±39
- Stewart, Craig
- −9 5 9 4 −8 10
- Checkley, Ian
- Rating Change
858±46 − 2 = 856±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 632±51
- Floyd, Dannie
- 4 6 3
- −4
- 1007±34
- Perkins, Shaun
- 4 3 7
- Chen, Max
- Rating Change
1471±38 − 10 = 1461±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1373±29
- Spizzica, Tony
- 5 −8 −5 7 5 −10 9
- −14
- 1377±41
- Hewitt, Ged
- 4 8 −3 5 8
- Cheung, Edmond
- Rating Change
1240±32 + 5 = 1245±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1177±36
- Farrell, Scott
- 8 9 9 11
- +1
- 1073±32
- Zwartz, Barney
- 5 5 4 6
- Conroy, Mark
- Rating Change
994±47 + 11 = 1005±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 958±39
- Carter, Benjamin
- −9 2 5 −9 6
- 0
- 612±48
- Walsh, Stephen
- 6 5 4
- Cung, Robert
- Rating Change
1317±34 + 14 = 1331±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1317±33
- Maranan, Jesse
- 7 5 9 −5 6
- +6
- 1295±31
- Brincat, Tony
- 9 9 9 −2 2
- D’Amico, Scott
- Rating Change
1639±36 − 10 = 1629±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1609±26
- Maksacheff, George
- 6 −9 5 9 7
- De Bondt, Case
- Rating Change
1505±30 − 5 = 1500±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 1584±33
- Menzies, Andrew
- 3 8 3 −8 −3 2
- −1
- 1658±37
- Waterman, Keith
- 6 9 −10 9 7
- Ede, Paul
- Rating Change
1218±39 + 11 = 1229±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1347±46
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- 0 12 9 −9 6
- −5
- 1295±35
- Burns, Justin
- 7 −5 10 −10 −5 6 8
- Elliget, Martin
- Rating Change
1370±30 − 8 = 1362±29 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1337±37
- Evans, Bruce
- 8 9 8 4
- −2
- 1488±42
- Roy, Phillip
- 3 6 7 8
- Evans, Bruce
- Rating Change
1348±39 + 0 = 1348±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1368±29
- Elliget, Martin
- 8 9 8 4
- −11
- 1335±40
- Neil, Alan
- 2 −12 5 1 4
- Evans, Richard P
- Rating Change
1281±34 + 13 = 1294±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1270±33
- Nguyen, Hoang David
- 6 7 5 −9 −7 5
- +6
- 1251±29
- Hayes, Simon
- 8 8 7 −5 14
- Farrell, Scott
- Rating Change
1175±37 − 4 = 1171±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 981±35
- McConnell, Nick
- 12 2 7 8
- −5
- 1241±32
- Cheung, Edmond
- 8 9 9 11
- Floyd, Dannie
- Rating Change
642±53 − 12 = 630±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 718±43
- McGuire, Jonathan
- 7 7 5
- −2
- 854±45
- Checkley, Ian
- 4 6 3
- Foster, Ron
- Rating Change
1529±38 − 11 = 1518±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1514±36
- Lim, Denise
- 10 6 −7 −5 9 8
- −1
- 1739±35
- Gin, Darian
- −10 4 5 2 4
- Furneaux, Jarryd
- Rating Change
973±47 + 10 = 983±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 869±45
- Hine, Robert
- 7 15 4
- +5
- 848±94
- Garratt, Bruce
- 9 8 6
- Gadd, James
- Rating Change
789±42 − 6 = 783±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 777±42
- Preston, Tanya
- 10 −4 −5 7 9
- −16
- 714±42
- Walsh, Michael
- −8 10 7 −10 7
- Garner, Grant
- Rating Change
1111±36 − 3 = 1108±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1062±59
- Stephens, Mark
- 1 7 3 4
- −8
- 1116±45
- Biddle, Jesse
- −6 9 −6 −7 7 7 10
- Garratt, Bruce
- Rating Change
902±112 − 76 = 826±88 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −57
- 914±39
- Carter, Josh
- −9 7 3 8
- −19
- 978±47
- Furneaux, Jarryd
- 9 8 6
- Gilson, Lynette
- Rating Change
1061±38 + 2 = 1063±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1069±60
- Stephens, Mark
- 5 3 4 7
- −6
- 1120±47
- Biddle, Jesse
- −13 6 14 7 −2 −9 1
- Gin, Darian
- Rating Change
1743±37 − 3 = 1740±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1519±36
- Foster, Ron
- −10 4 5 2 4
- −4
- 1845±31
- Lim, Ethan
- 2 −9 5 6 9
- Gormann, Ben
- Rating Change
1320±34 − 5 = 1315±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1270±57
- Ho, Allen
- −9 6 4 −5 −8 5 6
- −9
- 1275±38
- Stepanov, Nick
- −11 −12 7 3 8 −4 5
- Hallett, Ken
- Rating Change
1249±49 + 18 = 1267±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1210±39
- Tang, Swee Yin
- 7 6 −6 10 −5 −9 5
- +6
- 1162±34
- Lewis, Peter
- 9 9 9 −9 −9 −9 9
- Hanna, Emad
- Rating Change
1171±52 + 7 = 1178±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1026±40
- Smith, Jared
- 9 3 4 2
- +3
- 1006±38
- Hunt, Mark
- 6 8 6 −5 −8 4
- Harrison, Peter
- Rating Change
857±36 − 9 = 848±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 851±42
- Hine, Robert
- 7 −10 9 −8 4
- Haughton, Melanie
- Rating Change
1349±34 − 7 = 1342±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1254±35
- Hayes, Stephen
- 8 6 9 2
- −10
- 1273±39
- Stewart, Craig
- 7 −7 −11 10 10 5
- Hayes, Simon
- Rating Change
1257±30 − 10 = 1247±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1265±36
- Tagle, Sonny
- 5 7 −9 8 7
- −4
- 1289±34
- Evans, Richard P
- 8 8 7 −5 14
- Hayes, Stephen
- Rating Change
1260±37 − 10 = 1250±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1305±34
- Cauchi, Travis
- 10 5 4 6
- −4
- 1339±30
- Haughton, Melanie
- 8 6 9 2
- Herweynen, Edward John
- Rating Change
1091±37 − 2 = 1089±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1040±30
- Noble, Brian
- −7 −5 8 5 −3 5 5
- −8
- 1110±36
- Pal, Pradeesh
- 7 −7 3 8 7
- Hewitt, Ged
- Rating Change
1366±40 + 30 = 1396±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1475±37
- Chen, Max
- 4 8 −3 5 8
- +11
- 1376±39
- Smith, Greg
- −6 6 4 6 7
- Hine, Robert
- Rating Change
856±45 + 7 = 863±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 857±36
- Harrison, Peter
- 7 −10 9 −8 4
- −5
- 980±48
- Furneaux, Jarryd
- 7 15 4
- Ho, Allen
- Rating Change
1317±73 − 62 = 1255±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −47
- 1180±37
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- 7 9 −2 −7 6 −11 2
- −15
- 1311±31
- Gormann, Ben
- −9 6 4 −5 −8 5 6
- Hunt, Mark
- Rating Change
1021±40 − 16 = 1005±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 972±38
- Atalla, Maged
- 11 −5 9 −7 7 9
- −2
- 1176±53
- Hanna, Emad
- 6 8 6 −5 −8 4
- Jefimenko, Walter
- Rating Change
1340±37 + 6 = 1346±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1425±34
- Jones, Warren
- 7 5 −7 −5 −8 9 8
- −7
- 1381±29
- Walker, Ellen
- 7 9 8 −6 −10 −11 8
- Jones, Cameron
- Rating Change
990±38 + 5 = 995±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 928±38
- Puts, Arnold
- 8 3 3 −6 5
- Jones, Warren
- Rating Change
1420±35 − 7 = 1413±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1347±30
- Tait, Pamela
- 9 −9 −3 4 7 3
- −12
- 1333±36
- Jefimenko, Walter
- 7 5 −7 −5 −8 9 8
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- Rating Change
1343±45 − 16 = 1327±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1222±51
- Browning, Trevor
- 10 9 −8 8 6
- −19
- 1213±37
- Ede, Paul
- 0 12 9 −9 6
- Lane, Stephen
- Rating Change
1174±33 + 1 = 1175±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1231±36
- Lum, Lucas
- 6 6 −5 −8 8 −7 9
- −7
- 1169±33
- Newfield, Pete
- 5 8 8 6
- Leonard, Justin
- Rating Change
1185±38 + 16 = 1201±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1226±45
- Qin, Allen
- 6 −7 6 −6 4 6
- +4
- 1102±35
- Menz, Gary
- −7 11 6 10 7
- Lewis, Peter
- Rating Change
1165±35 − 6 = 1159±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1261±47
- Hallett, Ken
- 9 9 9 −9 −9 −9 9
- −3
- 1275±28
- Simons, Shane
- 10 12 9 9
- Lim, Denise
- Rating Change
1514±36 + 9 = 1523±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1528±37
- Foster, Ron
- 10 6 −7 −5 9 8
- 0
- 1848±31
- Lim, Ethan
- 5 8 6 7
- Lim, Ethan
- Rating Change
1845±31 + 3 = 1848±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1744±36
- Gin, Darian
- 2 −9 5 6 9
- 0
- 1524±36
- Lim, Denise
- 5 8 6 7
- Lum, Lucas
- Rating Change
1228±37 − 9 = 1219±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1109±36
- Bignell, Quentin
- 10 −7 7 −11 8 4
- −12
- 1166±30
- Lane, Stephen
- 6 6 −5 −8 8 −7 9
- Lum, Nicholas
- Rating Change
1842±47 + 2 = 1844±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1652±33
- Smith, Jakob
- 9 5 9 8
- +1
- 1619±33
- Martin, Alan
- 6 6 12 6
- Maksacheff, George
- Rating Change
1615±26 − 1 = 1614±25 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1639±36
- D’Amico, Scott
- 6 −9 5 9 7
- −6
- 1581±30
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- 9 −7 6 12 11
- Maranan, Jesse
- Rating Change
1326±35 − 17 = 1309±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1285±37
- Martus, Marcus
- −7 8 6 −6 7 −1 6
- −7
- 1323±34
- Cung, Robert
- 7 5 9 −5 6
- Martin, Alan
- Rating Change
1617±33 + 2 = 1619±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1470±28
- Sim, Clive
- 8 −9 10 7 14
- −1
- 1843±47
- Lum, Nicholas
- 6 6 12 6
- Martus, Marcus
- Rating Change
1296±40 + 0 = 1296±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1318±33
- Maranan, Jesse
- −7 8 6 −6 7 −1 6
- −11
- 1284±28
- Brincat, Tony
- 5 7 5 2
- Martus, Maria
- Rating Change
941±48 + 13 = 954±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 930±40
- Carter, Josh
- 10 8 11
- McConnell, Nick
- Rating Change
985±36 − 5 = 980±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1068±32
- Zwartz, Barney
- 8 6 1 4
- −1
- 1170±35
- Farrell, Scott
- 12 2 7 8
- McGuire, Jonathan
- Rating Change
719±43 + 6 = 725±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 639±52
- Floyd, Dannie
- 7 7 5
- −1
- 996±56
- Morella, Alex
- 11 3 11
- Menz, Gary
- Rating Change
1106±36 − 8 = 1098±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1191±36
- White, Chris
- 3 6 4 7
- −4
- 1196±38
- Leonard, Justin
- −7 11 6 10 7
- Menzies, Andrew
- Rating Change
1592±34 − 5 = 1587±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1503±30
- De Bondt, Case
- 3 8 3 −8 −3 2
- −9
- 1572±32
- Sykes, Chris
- 6 8 9 16
- Morella, Alex
- Rating Change
995±56 + 2 = 997±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 726±42
- McGuire, Jonathan
- 11 3 11
- +1
- 692±44
- Balsillie, Terry
- 5 7 6
- Neil, Alan
- Rating Change
1341±48 + 6 = 1347±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1359±38
- Evans, Bruce
- 2 −12 5 1 4
- −6
- 1489±42
- Roy, Phillip
- −9 2 4 8 8
- Newfield, Pete
- Rating Change
1164±33 + 13 = 1177±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1183±36
- Lane, Stephen
- 5 8 8 6
- +4
- 1112±37
- Bignell, Quentin
- 8 7 11 7
- Nguyen, Hoang David
- Rating Change
1280±38 − 16 = 1264±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1264±36
- Tagle, Sonny
- 12 8 7 8
- −6
- 1288±34
- Evans, Richard P
- 6 7 5 −9 −7 5
- Noble, Brian
- Rating Change
1031±30 + 5 = 1036±29 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1111±35
- Balsillie, David
- 7 −9 15 −8 3 5
- −4
- 1082±35
- Herweynen, Edward John
- −7 −5 8 5 −3 5 5
- Pal, Pradeesh
- Rating Change
1100±37 + 17 = 1117±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1107±35
- Balsillie, David
- 5 6 −7 −11 7 5
- +8
- 1096±37
- Herweynen, Edward John
- 7 −7 3 8 7
- Perkins, David
- Rating Change
1055±38 + 3 = 1058±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 925±38
- Puts, Arnold
- 10 −8 −8 8 17 5
- Perkins, Shaun
- Rating Change
1007±34 + 2 = 1009±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 859±46
- Checkley, Ian
- 4 3 7
- 0
- 692±44
- Balsillie, Terry
- 4 2 9
- Preston, Tanya
- Rating Change
779±43 − 14 = 765±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 773±39
- Gadd, James
- 10 −4 −5 7 9
- −2
- 948±37
- Carter, Benjamin
- −10 −9 5 9 8
- Puts, Arnold
- Rating Change
931±39 − 9 = 922±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 990±38
- Jones, Cameron
- 8 3 3 −6 5
- −3
- 1055±38
- Perkins, David
- 10 −8 −8 8 17 5
- Qin, Allen
- Rating Change
1215±45 − 4 = 1211±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1204±39
- White, Chris
- 6 11 6 −7 −6 −6 5
- −14
- 1190±38
- Leonard, Justin
- 6 −7 6 −6 4 6
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- Rating Change
1581±30 + 8 = 1589±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1620±26
- Maksacheff, George
- 9 −7 6 12 11
- Roy, Phillip
- Rating Change
1485±42 + 7 = 1492±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1364±29
- Elliget, Martin
- 3 6 7 8
- +3
- 1355±57
- Neil, Alan
- −9 2 4 8 8
- Sim, Clive
- Rating Change
1471±29 − 2 = 1469±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −1
- 1617±33
- Martin, Alan
- 8 −9 10 7 14
- −1
- 1650±33
- Smith, Jakob
- 7 −5 10 −10 7 6
- Simons, Shane
- Rating Change
1271±29 + 5 = 1276±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1209±39
- Tang, Swee Yin
- 8 5 6 −12 7
- +2
- 1161±34
- Lewis, Peter
- 10 12 9 9
- Smith, Greg
- Rating Change
1389±42 − 23 = 1366±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1364±29
- Spizzica, Tony
- 12 0 0 0
- −9
- 1384±45
- Hewitt, Ged
- −6 6 4 6 7
- Smith, Jakob
- Rating Change
1651±33 + 0 = 1651±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1470±28
- Sim, Clive
- 7 −5 10 −10 7 6
- −1
- 1842±47
- Lum, Nicholas
- 9 5 9 8
- Smith, Jared
- Rating Change
1046±47 − 22 = 1024±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −19
- 971±37
- Atalla, Maged
- 6 5 −8 −9 4 6
- −3
- 1174±53
- Hanna, Emad
- 9 3 4 2
- Spizzica, Tony
- Rating Change
1367±29 + 3 = 1370±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1376±39
- Smith, Greg
- 12 0 0 0
- −3
- 1456±36
- Chen, Max
- 5 −8 −5 7 5 −10 9
- Stepanov, Nick
- Rating Change
1271±38 + 18 = 1289±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1326±35
- Gormann, Ben
- −11 −12 7 3 8 −4 5
- +5
- 1200±38
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- 5 10 6 4
- Stephens, Mark
- Rating Change
1095±71 − 50 = 1045±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −34
- 1054±36
- Gilson, Lynette
- 5 3 4 7
- −16
- 1102±35
- Garner, Grant
- 1 7 3 4
- Stewart, Craig
- Rating Change
1259±40 + 30 = 1289±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1353±35
- Haughton, Melanie
- 7 −7 −11 10 10 5
- +13
- 1321±35
- Cauchi, Travis
- −9 5 9 4 −8 10
- Sykes, Chris
- Rating Change
1576±33 + 4 = 1580±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1596±34
- Menzies, Andrew
- 6 8 9 16
- −4
- 1655±37
- Waterman, Keith
- 5 6 −6 9 −5 6
- Tagle, Sonny
- Rating Change
1256±36 + 17 = 1273±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1271±33
- Nguyen, Hoang David
- 12 8 7 8
- +8
- 1252±29
- Hayes, Simon
- 5 7 −9 8 7
- Tait, Pamela
- Rating Change
1353±31 − 9 = 1344±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1380±29
- Walker, Ellen
- 7 9 8 −13 9
- −4
- 1408±34
- Jones, Warren
- 9 −9 −3 4 7 3
- Tang, Swee Yin
- Rating Change
1218±41 − 14 = 1204±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1257±48
- Hallett, Ken
- 7 6 −6 10 −5 −9 5
- −6
- 1273±28
- Simons, Shane
- 8 5 6 −12 7
- Walker, Ellen
- Rating Change
1376±30 + 9 = 1385±29 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1354±37
- Jefimenko, Walter
- 7 9 8 −6 −10 −11 8
- +5
- 1349±30
- Tait, Pamela
- 7 9 8 −13 9
- Walsh, Michael
- Rating Change
708±43 + 24 = 732±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 799±42
- Gadd, James
- −8 10 7 −10 7
- +5
- 620±50
- Walsh, Stephen
- −6 12 7 8
- Walsh, Stephen
- Rating Change
620±50 − 7 = 613±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 726±44
- Walsh, Michael
- −6 12 7 8
- 0
- 1004±49
- Conroy, Mark
- 6 5 4
- Waterman, Keith
- Rating Change
1653±37 + 7 = 1660±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1584±33
- Sykes, Chris
- 5 6 −6 9 −5 6
- +2
- 1502±30
- De Bondt, Case
- 6 9 −10 9 7
- White, Chris
- Rating Change
1199±39 − 5 = 1194±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1101±35
- Menz, Gary
- 3 6 4 7
- −10
- 1200±40
- Qin, Allen
- 6 11 6 −7 −6 −6 5
- Zwartz, Barney
- Rating Change
1069±32 + 2 = 1071±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 984±36
- McConnell, Nick
- 8 6 1 4
- −1
- 1244±32
- Cheung, Edmond
- 5 5 4 6
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 96. Matches: 93. Club: Croydon and Districts Table Tennis Association. Province: VIC. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bristowe, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 24650. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-10 12:58 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-04-28 11:40 pm EDT.