2017 CDTTA Pennant 3105
2017-05-31
Detailed Report
- Atalla, Maged
- Rating Change
988±39 − 17 = 971±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 987±37
- Conroy, Mark
- 5 10 6 −5 8
- −7
- 1016±40
- Jones, Cameron
- 8 10 −7 −8 −6 6 8
- Balsillie, Terry
- Rating Change
671±43 − 13 = 658±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 663±39
- Walsh, Stephen
- 8 −9 7 7 7
- 0
- 996±72
- Cuthbert, Liam
- 6 10 4 6
- Bignell, Quentin
- Rating Change
1098±35 − 8 = 1090±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1163±28
- Gaiser, Simon
- 8 −9 3 −6 6 8
- −3
- 1217±38
- White, Chris
- 3 −5 −8 6 6 9
- Boreham, Ron
- Rating Change
1144±46 − 9 = 1135±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1248±42
- Powers, Grant
- −9 4 8 6 8
- −2
- 1312±31
- Burns, Justin
- 6 5 7 7
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- Rating Change
1183±37 − 5 = 1178±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1289±157
- Kubik, Adrian
- −9 −9 9 9 9 9
- −13
- 1095±39
- Garner, Grant
- 6 11 12 8
- Brincat, Tony
- Rating Change
1296±30 + 14 = 1310±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1372±35
- Gormann, Ben
- 7 9 9 3
- +5
- 1286±39
- David, Thomas
- 8 3 8 6
- Brooke, Nicholas
- Rating Change
1580±30 + 1 = 1581±29 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1536±28
- De Bondt, Case
- 5 −8 3 −7 11 −7 10
- −3
- 1656±34
- Smith, Jakob
- 6 8 −5 5 −8 4
- Brown, Andrew
- Rating Change
1083±45 − 20 = 1063±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1098±36
- Herweynen, Edward John
- 4 −7 −11 6 7 4
- −9
- 1106±50
- Natschev, John
- 9 −8 7 8 9
- Browning, Michael
- Rating Change
960±40 − 6 = 954±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 1103±36
- Herweynen, Edward John
- −13 7 6 8 −9 8
- −2
- 1115±50
- Natschev, John
- 7 5 9 −7 −5 10
- Burns, Justin
- Rating Change
1306±32 + 7 = 1313±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1284±31
- Keating, John
- 9 −10 −5 5 8 8
- +1
- 1137±44
- Boreham, Ron
- 6 5 7 7
- Cauchi, Travis
- Rating Change
1291±31 + 4 = 1295±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1384±40
- Smith, Greg
- −5 6 −6 14 8 4
- −6
- 1305±35
- Cung, Robert
- 8 11 −1 6 −5 −9 9
- Chen, Max
- Rating Change
1499±33 − 7 = 1492±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1571±34
- Menzies, Andrew
- −8 7 9 3 −5 2
- −3
- 1594±44
- Hall, Mark
- 4 6 8 −5 7
- Cheung, Edmond
- Rating Change
1228±29 − 7 = 1221±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1288±28
- Simons, Shane
- 8 −8 −11 8 7 9
- −3
- 1292±36
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- 6 7 −6 7 −6 9
- Chew, Chuan
- Rating Change
1187±29 − 9 = 1178±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1205±29
- Lum, Lucas
- 11 10 6 8
- −4
- 1231±36
- Lane, Stephen
- 3 11 10 −7 9
- Conroy, Mark
- Rating Change
994±39 + 0 = 994±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 979±37
- Atalla, Maged
- 5 10 6 −5 8
- −8
- 1015±37
- Maclean, Lachlan
- 5 −7 −5 13 4 −8 7
- Cung, Robert
- Rating Change
1310±36 + 3 = 1313±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1301±31
- Cauchi, Travis
- 8 11 −1 6 −5 −9 9
- −5
- 1374±28
- Spizzica, Tony
- 6 −9 −9 8 7 10
- Cuthbert, Liam
- Rating Change
991±73 + 6 = 997±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 777±53
- Thomson, Nick
- 7 3 3 6
- +1
- 659±41
- Balsillie, Terry
- 6 10 4 6
- D’Amico, Scott
- Rating Change
1653±33 − 5 = 1648±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1534±27
- De Bondt, Case
- 8 6 10 7
- −7
- 1653±33
- Smith, Jakob
- −5 3 11 7 6
- David, Thomas
- Rating Change
1278±39 − 1 = 1277±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1245±37
- Hallett, Ken
- 6 6 11 −8 10
- −8
- 1305±31
- Brincat, Tony
- 8 3 8 6
- De Bondt, Case
- Rating Change
1539±30 − 7 = 1532±26 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1577±29
- Brooke, Nicholas
- 5 −8 3 −7 11 −7 10
- −2
- 1645±30
- D’Amico, Scott
- 8 6 10 7
- Evans, Bruce
- Rating Change
1332±38 − 2 = 1330±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1331±36
- Newfield, Adam
- 7 3 10 7
- −11
- 1306±28
- Neil, Alan
- 9 −5 10 9 3
- Evans, Emilie
- Rating Change
1189±43 + 0 = 1189±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1171±29
- Gaiser, Simon
- 7 −9 15 −9 9 8
- −10
- 1212±38
- White, Chris
- 8 9 −4 0 5
- Evans, Richard P
- Rating Change
1290±32 − 11 = 1279±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1308±28
- Neil, Alan
- 7 9 10 3
- −5
- 1316±35
- Newfield, Adam
- 8 11 6 −7 1
- Evans, Shaun
- Rating Change
1090±34 − 6 = 1084±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1056±145
- Kubik, Adrian
- −9 9 9 9 9
- Evans, Steve
- Rating Change
1093±34 − 6 = 1087±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 964±47
- Jansen, Michael
- 9 9 −9 −12 11 8
- −9
- 1060±44
- Jansen, Peter
- 8 8 −8 8 10
- Floyd, Dannie
- Rating Change
615±45 − 15 = 600±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 664±39
- Walsh, Michael
- −9 5 2 −3 −12 4 11
- −5
- 700±40
- McGuire, Jonathan
- 4 −3 9 7 9
- Furneaux, Jarryd
- Rating Change
1001±40 + 4 = 1005±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1033±33
- Perkins, Shaun
- 10 9 −8 6 8
- −7
- 1050±43
- Smith, Jared
- 6 6 −9 9 8
- Gaiser, Simon
- Rating Change
1167±29 − 2 = 1165±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1094±34
- Bignell, Quentin
- 8 −9 3 −6 6 8
- −5
- 1179±40
- Evans, Emilie
- 7 −9 15 −9 9 8
- Garner, Grant
- Rating Change
1095±39 + 15 = 1110±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1188±37
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- 6 11 12 8
- Gilson, Lynette
- Rating Change
1038±39 − 1 = 1037±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1007±43
- McLennan, Bill
- 11 9 9 8
- −8
- 1056±53
- Tan, Yoke-Ching
- 7 −6 9 7 6
- Gormann, Ben
- Rating Change
1369±35 − 8 = 1361±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1241±37
- Hallett, Ken
- 6 8 −7 6 6
- −11
- 1301±30
- Brincat, Tony
- 7 9 9 3
- Hall, Mark
- Rating Change
1595±45 + 5 = 1600±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1495±31
- Chen, Max
- 4 6 8 −5 7
- −1
- 1824±31
- Lim, Ethan
- 4 3 6 7
- Hallett, Ken
- Rating Change
1249±38 − 12 = 1237±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1269±37
- David, Thomas
- 6 6 11 −8 10
- −3
- 1358±32
- Gormann, Ben
- 6 8 −7 6 6
- Hanna, Emad
- Rating Change
1181±48 + 7 = 1188±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1082±48
- Jansen, Peter
- 6 5 5 10
- +1
- 961±46
- Jansen, Michael
- 8 2 9 5
- Haughton, Melanie
- Rating Change
1343±34 + 1 = 1344±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1415±41
- Hewitt, Ged
- 7 8 5 −3 −1 7
- −10
- 1296±35
- Stewart, Craig
- 7 8 −3 7 8
- Herweynen, Edward John
- Rating Change
1095±37 + 10 = 1105±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1072±42
- Brown, Andrew
- 4 −7 −11 6 7 4
- +2
- 957±39
- Browning, Michael
- −13 7 6 8 −9 8
- Hewitt, Ged
- Rating Change
1408±40 − 7 = 1401±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1379±38
- Jefimenko, Walter
- 5 −5 2 5 −6 9
- −14
- 1334±32
- Haughton, Melanie
- 7 8 5 −3 −1 7
- Hine, Robert
- Rating Change
865±42 + 5 = 870±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 891±40
- Puts, Arnold
- 9 8 10 −6 11
- −8
- 908±42
- Morella, Alex
- 5 3 −10 5 6
- Hunt, Mark
- Rating Change
1041±39 + 0 = 1041±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1031±33
- Perkins, Shaun
- −9 5 3 7 6
- −9
- 1047±43
- Smith, Jared
- −7 7 7 8 9
- Jansen, Michael
- Rating Change
966±47 − 7 = 959±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1084±33
- Evans, Steve
- 9 9 −9 −12 11 8
- −1
- 1186±48
- Hanna, Emad
- 8 2 9 5
- Jansen, Peter
- Rating Change
1066±47 + 9 = 1075±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1095±34
- Evans, Steve
- 8 8 −8 8 10
- −6
- 1182±48
- Hanna, Emad
- 6 5 5 10
- Jefimenko, Walter
- Rating Change
1374±38 − 3 = 1371±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1312±36
- Stewart, Craig
- 1 6 8 7
- −8
- 1394±35
- Hewitt, Ged
- 5 −5 2 5 −6 9
- Jones, Cameron
- Rating Change
1004±40 + 21 = 1025±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1033±38
- Maclean, Lachlan
- 10 10 3 −9 7
- +8
- 978±37
- Atalla, Maged
- 8 10 −7 −8 −6 6 8
- Keating, John
- Rating Change
1293±32 − 14 = 1279±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1237±42
- Powers, Grant
- 14 −3 9 −7 6 7
- −6
- 1307±31
- Burns, Justin
- 9 −10 −5 5 8 8
- Kubik, Adrian
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 51 = 1149±104 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +99
- 1090±34
- Evans, Shaun
- −9 9 9 9 9
- −150
- 1170±35
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- −9 −9 9 9 9 9
- Lal Nam, Kep Lian Thang
- Rating Change
1292±36 + 5 = 1297±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1224±29
- Cheung, Edmond
- 6 7 −6 7 −6 9
- Lane, Stephen
- Rating Change
1229±35 + 7 = 1236±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1182±28
- Chew, Chuan
- 3 11 10 −7 9
- +2
- 1109±36
- Pal, Pradeesh
- −9 −7 −6 4 6 7 3
- Lim, Denise
- Rating Change
1535±39 + 7 = 1542±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1573±31
- Sykes, Chris
- 8 4 11 9
- −5
- 1631±37
- Waterman, Keith
- 4 8 7 9
- Lim, Ethan
- Rating Change
1824±31 + 1 = 1825±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1601±44
- Hall, Mark
- 4 3 6 7
- 0
- 1576±34
- Menzies, Andrew
- 2 −12 3 −9 6 6
- Lum, Lucas
- Rating Change
1202±29 + 7 = 1209±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1183±28
- Chew, Chuan
- 11 10 6 8
- +2
- 1110±37
- Pal, Pradeesh
- 7 3 6 8
- Lum, Nicholas
- Rating Change
1936±73 + 13 = 1949±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1840±30
- Taylor, Benjamin J
- 5 6 12 6
- 0
- 1360±31
- Walker, Ellen
- 6 6 2 4
- Maclean, Lachlan
- Rating Change
1026±38 − 2 = 1024±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1004±38
- Conroy, Mark
- 5 −7 −5 13 4 −8 7
- −10
- 1014±40
- Jones, Cameron
- 10 10 3 −9 7
- McConnell, Nick
- Rating Change
1030±28 + 0 = 1030±27 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1008±43
- McLennan, Bill
- 2 5 7 −10 3
- −4
- 1057±54
- Tan, Yoke-Ching
- 9 −9 8 −8 10 5
- McGuire, Jonathan
- Rating Change
705±41 + 0 = 705±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 606±43
- Floyd, Dannie
- 4 −3 9 7 9
- −4
- 816±45
- Preston, Tanya
- 6 −12 8 3 5
- McLennan, Bill
- Rating Change
1019±45 − 22 = 997±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1025±27
- McConnell, Nick
- 2 5 7 −10 3
- −10
- 1029±37
- Gilson, Lynette
- 11 9 9 8
- Menz, Gary
- Rating Change
1114±38 + 23 = 1137±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1235±40
- Qin, Allen
- −9 8 −2 9 10 6
- +7
- 1081±32
- Zwartz, Barney
- 9 4 7 −7 −5 10
- Menzies, Andrew
- Rating Change
1571±34 + 4 = 1575±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1496±32
- Chen, Max
- −8 7 9 3 −5 2
- −1
- 1824±31
- Lim, Ethan
- 2 −12 3 −9 6 6
- Morella, Alex
- Rating Change
911±43 + 7 = 918±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 878±41
- Hine, Robert
- 5 3 −10 5 6
- −3
- 1077±38
- Perkins, David
- −9 10 10 6 −7 5
- Natschev, John
- Rating Change
1101±51 + 17 = 1118±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1071±42
- Brown, Andrew
- 9 −8 7 8 9
- +4
- 956±39
- Browning, Michael
- 7 5 9 −7 −5 10
- Neil, Alan
- Rating Change
1301±29 + 12 = 1313±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1341±37
- Evans, Bruce
- 9 −5 10 9 3
- +5
- 1285±31
- Evans, Richard P
- 7 9 10 3
- Newfield, Adam
- Rating Change
1324±37 − 2 = 1322±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1284±31
- Evans, Richard P
- 8 11 6 −7 1
- −9
- 1321±36
- Evans, Bruce
- 7 3 10 7
- Pal, Pradeesh
- Rating Change
1114±39 − 7 = 1107±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1207±30
- Lum, Lucas
- 7 3 6 8
- −3
- 1234±37
- Lane, Stephen
- −9 −7 −6 4 6 7 3
- Perkins, David
- Rating Change
1075±39 + 4 = 1079±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 919±41
- Morella, Alex
- −9 10 10 6 −7 5
- +1
- 881±39
- Puts, Arnold
- −10 4 4 −9 3 3
- Perkins, Shaun
- Rating Change
1041±35 − 17 = 1024±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 993±37
- Furneaux, Jarryd
- 10 9 −8 6 8
- −7
- 1031±36
- Hunt, Mark
- −9 5 3 7 6
- Powers, Grant
- Rating Change
1231±43 + 21 = 1252±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1287±31
- Keating, John
- 14 −3 9 −7 6 7
- +5
- 1140±45
- Boreham, Ron
- −9 4 8 6 8
- Preston, Tanya
- Rating Change
813±45 + 8 = 821±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 710±40
- McGuire, Jonathan
- 6 −12 8 3 5
- +3
- 674±39
- Walsh, Michael
- 5 13 8 3
- Puts, Arnold
- Rating Change
893±41 − 14 = 879±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 857±40
- Hine, Robert
- 9 8 10 −6 11
- −1
- 1077±38
- Perkins, David
- −10 4 4 −9 3 3
- Qin, Allen
- Rating Change
1228±40 − 9 = 1219±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1187±36
- Tang, Swee Yin
- 6 −6 8 −3 3 9
- −16
- 1122±37
- Menz, Gary
- −9 8 −2 9 10 6
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- Rating Change
1564±29 − 9 = 1555±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1560±29
- Sykes, Chris
- 6 9 −8 −7 −6 5 7
- −3
- 1629±37
- Waterman, Keith
- −10 7 9 9 11
- Roy, Paul
- Rating Change
1656±32 − 1 = 1655±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1360±31
- Walker, Ellen
- 6 3 −8 7 −8 7
- −1
- 1836±30
- Taylor, Benjamin J
- 6 9 −5 8 7
- Simons, Shane
- Rating Change
1288±28 + 3 = 1291±27 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1224±29
- Cheung, Edmond
- 8 −8 −11 8 7 9
- Smith, Greg
- Rating Change
1373±39 − 5 = 1368±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1383±28
- Spizzica, Tony
- 4 5 11 9
- −15
- 1285±31
- Cauchi, Travis
- −5 6 −6 14 8 4
- Smith, Jakob
- Rating Change
1649±33 + 11 = 1660±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1655±33
- D’Amico, Scott
- −5 3 11 7 6
- +4
- 1585±30
- Brooke, Nicholas
- 6 8 −5 5 −8 4
- Smith, Jared
- Rating Change
1038±42 + 21 = 1059±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1051±40
- Hunt, Mark
- −7 7 7 8 9
- +9
- 1014±40
- Furneaux, Jarryd
- 6 6 −9 9 8
- Spizzica, Tony
- Rating Change
1379±28 − 2 = 1377±27 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1318±36
- Cung, Robert
- 6 −9 −9 8 7 10
- −6
- 1359±36
- Smith, Greg
- 4 5 11 9
- Stewart, Craig
- Rating Change
1301±36 + 6 = 1307±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1354±34
- Haughton, Melanie
- 7 8 −3 7 8
- −5
- 1367±34
- Jefimenko, Walter
- 1 6 8 7
- Sykes, Chris
- Rating Change
1567±31 − 2 = 1565±29 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1561±28
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- 6 9 −8 −7 −6 5 7
- −8
- 1530±37
- Lim, Denise
- 8 4 11 9
- Tan, Yoke-Ching
- Rating Change
1042±52 + 30 = 1072±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1046±39
- Gilson, Lynette
- 7 −6 9 7 6
- +15
- 1034±27
- McConnell, Nick
- 9 −9 8 −8 10 5
- Tang, Swee Yin
- Rating Change
1183±37 − 4 = 1179±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1078±32
- Zwartz, Barney
- 5 7 5 −7 6
- −7
- 1212±36
- Qin, Allen
- 6 −6 8 −3 3 9
- Taylor, Benjamin J
- Rating Change
1839±31 − 2 = 1837±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1656±32
- Roy, Paul
- 6 9 −5 8 7
- −3
- 1936±73
- Lum, Nicholas
- 5 6 12 6
- Thomson, Nick
- Rating Change
769±55 + 6 = 775±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 679±39
- Walsh, Stephen
- 7 8 −5 −9 8 −9 11
- −3
- 993±73
- Cuthbert, Liam
- 7 3 3 6
- Walker, Ellen
- Rating Change
1360±31 + 0 = 1360±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1655±32
- Roy, Paul
- 6 3 −8 7 −8 7
- 0
- 1949±75
- Lum, Nicholas
- 6 6 2 4
- Walsh, Michael
- Rating Change
667±40 + 4 = 671±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 608±43
- Floyd, Dannie
- −9 5 2 −3 −12 4 11
- −3
- 818±45
- Preston, Tanya
- 5 13 8 3
- Walsh, Stephen
- Rating Change
668±40 + 5 = 673±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 670±43
- Balsillie, Terry
- 8 −9 7 7 7
- −5
- 766±53
- Thomson, Nick
- 7 8 −5 −9 8 −9 11
- Waterman, Keith
- Rating Change
1625±38 + 10 = 1635±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1559±28
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- −10 7 9 9 11
- +4
- 1547±41
- Lim, Denise
- 4 8 7 9
- White, Chris
- Rating Change
1209±38 + 11 = 1220±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1199±42
- Evans, Emilie
- 8 9 −4 0 5
- +3
- 1093±34
- Bignell, Quentin
- 3 −5 −8 6 6 9
- Zwartz, Barney
- Rating Change
1084±33 − 8 = 1076±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1130±39
- Menz, Gary
- 9 4 7 −7 −5 10
- −3
- 1177±36
- Tang, Swee Yin
- 5 7 5 −7 6
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 87. Matches: 85. Club: Croydon and Districts Table Tennis Association. Province: VIC. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bristowe, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 25418. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-09 1:28 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-04-18 11:29 pm EDT.