TTSA Winter Pennant (May 29-30) Round 4
2017-06-19
Detailed Report
- Abdilla, George
- Rating Change
1737±34 − 7 = 1730±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1648±46
- Thai, Ha My Trinh
- −7 5 6 5
- −12
- 1642±37
- Luong, Liem
- 10 3 −10 −5 6
- +1
- 1524±36
- Du, Phat Tang
- 4 −14 7 7
- Adams, Mike
- Rating Change
742±52 − 9 = 733±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 746±76
- Lau, May Chan
- 2 6 4
- −24
- 660±48
- Thomas, Cam
- 4 10 −8 7
- −1
- 1025±43
- Mills, Toby
- 7 7 10
- Agocs, Eszter
- Rating Change
1314±73 + 100 = 1414±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +48
- 1407±35
- Ferro, Tony
- 10 −5 −9 3 6
- +31
- 1374±44
- Fan, Tian Zhang
- −6 8 5 8
- +21
- 1356±45
- Le, Su
- 8 −9 10 −7 10
- Akonor, Solomen
- Rating Change
1891±70 − 8 = 1883±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1905±79
- Swanson, Alex
- 14 6 −6 7
- −37
- 1804±62
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- 12 9 8
- +4
- 1700±47
- Zhang, Michael
- 12 −10 8 7
- Al-Boasi, Zee
- Rating Change
1396±129 − 135 = 1261±85 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 960±50
- Le, Tuan Quang
- 6 −4 5 6
- −138
- 1114±60
- Hoang, Hung
- 9 −6 11 8
- 0
- 790±57
- Nguyen, Hung
- 2 5 5
- Aufderheide, Steve
- Rating Change
1421±33 − 20 = 1401±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1354±42
- Maddigan, Damien
- 10 2 8
- −6
- 1426±44
- Langhans, Geoffrey
- 10 0 −7 −9 8
- −5
- 1443±53
- Grant, Paul
- 5 −5 6 5
- Bates, Stephen
- Rating Change
1632±42 + 5 = 1637±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1508±53
- Malyschko, Peter
- 10 7 −8 7
- +1
- 1413±42
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- 7 5 4
- 0
- 1347±48
- Lowe, David
- 3 12 6
- Beal, James
- Rating Change
1171±61 + 8 = 1179±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1100±61
- Tan, Ling
- −8 7 8 −8 8
- −11
- 1268±67
- Jin, Ming
- 9 −8 12 13
- +7
- 1047±51
- Sexton, Adam
- −9 3 −6 8 7
- Bellido, Jose
- Rating Change
879±58 + 2 = 881±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 723±73
- Lau, May Chan
- 10 6 8
- −7
- 1022±44
- Mills, Toby
- 8 9 6
- +3
- 684±46
- Thomas, Cam
- 6 5 4
- Bellido, Sebastian
- Rating Change
954±47 + 11 = 965±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 852±94
- Lau, Henry
- −6 8 6 −7 6
- +3
- 797±43
- Taneja, Pranjay
- 6 −8 6 6
- +3
- 790±41
- Lau, Ivan
- −11 1 −4 7 8
- Bonner, Beverley
- Rating Change
918±55 + 7 = 925±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 866±51
- Roder, Lenore
- 8 5 11
- −14
- 960±50
- Freegard, Anthony
- −9 2 −8 6 8
- +8
- 826±51
- Davies, Owen
- 11 9 8
- Bonner, Steve
- Rating Change
1635±73 − 28 = 1607±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −21
- 1689±47
- Zhang, Michael
- −1 8 8 6
- −4
- 1832±63
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- 4 −9 4 9
- −3
- 1866±71
- Swanson, Alex
- −8 2 −9 10 7
- Box, David
- Rating Change
1000±150 + 122 = 1122±82 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +130
- 1132±47
- Ciantar, Robert
- 8 12 −10 −11 13
- −48
- 1135±52
- Teagle, Ken
- 8 5 −9 8
- +39
- 1056±51
- Hyland, Bernie
- −6 8 9 4
- Bu, Bruce
- Rating Change
1160±56 − 2 = 1158±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1141±44
- Takos, Harry
- 9 −3 6 −7 8
- −16
- 1182±52
- Panicker, Ajeendra
- −9 4 −6 9 8
- −3
- 1360±80
- Milsom, Lucas
- 7 5 7
- Bui, Nghia
- Rating Change
1200±200 + 32 = 1232±90 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +142
- 1199±36
- Lawrie, Daniel
- 8 −6 9 −9 11
- −152
- 1162±53
- Shaughnessy, Graeme
- 9 12 −8 −5 7
- +42
- 1151±40
- Dashko, Alex
- 10 8 3
- Bui, Viet
- Rating Change
1830±86 − 11 = 1819±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1700±31
- Rogers, Mitchell
- 5 9 5
- −21
- 1938±46
- Liang, Keyman
- 8 7 10
- −3
- 2089±61
- Houston, Scott A
- 5 7 7
- Bungey, Greg
- Rating Change
1353±44 − 22 = 1331±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1148±76
- Giang, Kha
- −10 9 2 6
- −26
- 1114±42
- Tyas, Robbie
- 8 8 6
- +2
- 1148±40
- Dashko, Alex
- 2 6 −6 3
- Burrows, Alana
- Rating Change
856±60 − 1 = 855±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 878±95
- Lau, Henry
- −5 −5 4 9 9
- −30
- 777±44
- Taneja, Pranjay
- 7 −8 −9 4 10
- +12
- 795±42
- Lau, Ivan
- 3 6 −9 −8 7
- Chan, Michelle
- Rating Change
1426±83 − 30 = 1396±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1221±40
- McCloughry, David
- 5 5 1
- −37
- 1405±72
- Cook, Stephen Steve
- −8 7 13 6
- +2
- 1152±53
- Roberts, Tony
- −9 1 6 6
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- Rating Change
1362±43 + 4 = 1366±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1148±40
- Dashko, Alex
- 5 8 5
- +2
- 1147±75
- Giang, Kha
- 11 11 3
- +1
- 1139±41
- Tyas, Robbie
- −5 −2 6 9 8
- Cher, Ryan
- Rating Change
1427±130 − 81 = 1346±79 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 1333±60
- Costabile, Maurizio
- −7 10 5 14
- −132
- 1183±48
- McCauley, Peter
- 8 5 −7 −6 9
- +7
- 1150±33
- Lawrie, Lynda
- 7 9 5
- Ciantar, Robert
- Rating Change
1152±57 − 38 = 1114±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −22
- 1055±96
- Box, David
- 8 12 −10 −11 13
- −16
- 1107±42
- Lee, Andrew
- 10 9 −6 −11 6
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- Rating Change
1161±47 + 37 = 1198±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1275±39
- Walsh, Dennis
- −5 4 9 −4 9
- −7
- 1245±33
- Langley, Cynthia
- −3 8 4 5
- +14
- 1215±50
- Hatsitsopanidis, Harry
- −9 −5 5 12 7
- −5
- 1269±39
- Davies, Philip
- 7 7 12
- +10
- 1174±43
- Deutrom, Paul
- 7 7 6
- +4
- 1073±36
- Li, Jack
- 8 3 9
- Cook, Stephen Steve
- Rating Change
1399±73 + 37 = 1436±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1435±83
- Chan, Michelle
- −8 7 13 6
- +4
- 1213±60
- Fung, Jasmine
- 3 9 9
- +1
- 1121±40
- Lee, Andrew
- 6 5 10
- Coombes, Julie
- Rating Change
1330±32 + 12 = 1342±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1408±36
- Ferro, Tony
- −7 7 5 −5 9
- −7
- 1327±47
- Le, Su
- 6 8 −3 9
- +8
- 1376±45
- Fan, Tian Zhang
- −6 7 −4 7 10
- Costabile, Maurizio
- Rating Change
1326±62 − 16 = 1310±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1145±39
- Darwent, Dawn
- 8 8 4
- −22
- 1303±81
- Cher, Ryan
- −7 10 5 14
- +1
- 1003±68
- Xu, Peggie
- 5 3 5
- Coxon, Andy
- Rating Change
1544±78 − 17 = 1527±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1452±59
- Dawe, Andrew
- −9 8 11 7
- −37
- 1532±42
- Lewis, Bill
- 5 7 6
- +3
- 1308±58
- Mitchell, Phil
- 9 8 8
- Curle, Michael
- Rating Change
800±150 + 59 = 859±88 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +96
- 828±62
- Pham, Tony
- 9 8
- −63
- 880±72
- Tran, Duy
- 6 12
- +26
- 733±54
- Du, Daniel
- 8 4
- Dang, Kevin
- Rating Change
1236±84 − 52 = 1184±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1015±64
- Tan, Yong Han
- 10 4 −10 10
- −60
- 1122±43
- Mitev, Thomas
- −6 9 9 9
- 0
- 652±74
- Teale, Miltos
- 8 3 9
- Darwent, Dawn
- Rating Change
1169±43 − 24 = 1145±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 1141±33
- Lawrie, Lynda
- 11 9 10
- −8
- 1195±50
- McCauley, Peter
- −5 −3 6 6 1
- −2
- 1317±58
- Costabile, Maurizio
- 8 8 4
- Dashko, Alex
- Rating Change
1169±45 − 23 = 1146±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 930±50
- Nguyen, Jennifer
- 6 4 −10 −8 7
- −12
- 1172±44
- Stevels, Mathijs
- 6 −7 6 3
- −7
- 1193±103
- Bui, Nghia
- 10 8 3
- −2
- 1332±42
- Bungey, Greg
- 2 6 −6 3
- −2
- 1333±56
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 6 6 3
- −1
- 1366±42
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- 5 8 5
- Davies, Owen
- Rating Change
833±54 − 14 = 819±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 916±49
- Bonner, Beverley
- 11 9 8
- −3
- 1020±69
- Parenti, Stefan
- −7 5 9 −7 6
- −1
- 1083±55
- Kirsten, Ernie
- 8 10 14
- Davies, Philip
- Rating Change
1253±40 + 20 = 1273±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1231±37
- Hartnett, Dennis
- 8 8 −7 8
- +6
- 1200±41
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- 7 7 12
- +5
- 1179±41
- Errington, Glenn A
- 8 −10 8 −8 9
- Dawe, Andrew
- Rating Change
1417±66 + 18 = 1435±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1377±49
- Von Einem, Tim
- 8 6 6
- −13
- 1509±65
- Coxon, Andy
- −9 8 11 7
- +13
- 1359±46
- Launder, David
- 8 8 9
- Deutrom, Paul
- Rating Change
1156±44 + 7 = 1163±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1188±38
- Swanbury, James
- 11 12 −4 −6 9
- −10
- 1184±40
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- 7 7 6
- +2
- 1002±42
- Vanicky, Jerry
- 4 5 9
- Diem, My
- Rating Change
671±74 + 59 = 730±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +49
- 800±47
- Woodcock, Thomas
- −7 5 8 6
- −18
- 748±53
- Zhang, Peter
- 10 −9 10 8
- +28
- 758±49
- Hampel, Bailey
- 12 10 10
- Dissanayake, Savin
- Rating Change
553±77 − 13 = 540±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 720±53
- Du, Daniel
- −8 6 9
- −3
- 809±59
- Pham, Tony
- 8 0
- −1
- 893±71
- Tran, Duy
- 7 2
- Du, Daniel
- Rating Change
729±55 − 4 = 725±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 548±75
- Dissanayake, Savin
- −8 6 9
- −8
- 832±97
- Curle, Michael
- 8 4
- Du, Nathan
- Rating Change
723±58 − 3 = 720±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 706±63
- Newman, Anya
- 10 6
- −15
- 765±55
- Wauchope, Peter
- 8 6
- −4
- 895±85
- Newman, Ben
- 8 8
- Du, Nghia
- Rating Change
921±60 + 15 = 936±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 782±47
- Woodcock, Thomas
- 9 9 6
- +5
- 762±52
- Zhang, Peter
- 9 11 7
- +3
- 740±49
- Hampel, Bailey
- 10 −5 9 −6 9
- Du, Phat Tang
- Rating Change
1592±44 − 70 = 1522±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −23
- 1412±50
- Harrison, Keegan
- 9 6 8
- −19
- 1438±50
- Zhao, Mark
- 5 −9 −6 1 7
- −12
- 1530±36
- Langley, Dyson
- 12 −8 6 8
- −8
- 1550±47
- Lu, Jason
- 4 9 5
- −7
- 1552±43
- Joshi, Ankit
- −9 2 −9 10 5
- −1
- 1731±32
- Abdilla, George
- 4 −14 7 7
- Du, Sally
- Rating Change
1175±44 + 29 = 1204±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1253±53
- Vishwachandra, Chamal
- 8 6 7
- +9
- 1163±60
- Ng, Sheldon
- 10 −9 3 9
- +3
- 1020±135
- Jhaveri, Kettan
- 8 7 9
- Errington, Glenn A
- Rating Change
1196±45 − 22 = 1174±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1244±33
- Langley, Cynthia
- 5 11 7
- −7
- 1254±38
- Walsh, Dennis
- −10 9 −9 3 8
- −5
- 1267±39
- Davies, Philip
- 8 −10 8 −8 9
- Espartero, Joel
- Rating Change
1076±63 − 3 = 1073±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 966±51
- Le, Tuan Quang
- −9 −9 6 7 2
- −15
- 1144±67
- Hoang, Hung
- −7 −10 9 3 5
- +1
- 791±57
- Nguyen, Hung
- 11 5 6
- Fan, Tian Zhang
- Rating Change
1409±49 − 45 = 1364±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −22
- 1335±31
- Coombes, Julie
- −6 7 −4 7 10
- −12
- 1389±70
- Agocs, Eszter
- −6 8 5 8
- −11
- 1400±38
- Howarth, Scott
- 2 8 9
- Farley, Craig
- Rating Change
1239±37 − 20 = 1219±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1044±51
- Sexton, Adam
- 9 6 11
- −16
- 1046±57
- Tan, Ling
- 6 7 −4 −8 9
- −6
- 1257±67
- Jin, Ming
- 4 −8 −6 8 6
- Farley, Jade
- Rating Change
548±60 − 7 = 541±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 723±102
- Fernee, Reuben
- 9 7
- −1
- 839±62
- Li, Glen
- 8 6
- 0
- 1019±95
- Gerges, Youssef
- 4 3
- Farley, Shannon
- Rating Change
657±47 + 17 = 674±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 882±126
- Fernee, Reuben
- 10 4
- −3
- 836±63
- Li, Glen
- 8 13
- 0
- 1018±96
- Gerges, Youssef
- 3 2
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- Rating Change
1550±47 + 26 = 1576±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1571±42
- Liang, David
- 8 −7 7 7
- +9
- 1508±42
- Tan, Kok Chong
- −8 7 9 10
- +2
- 1390±56
- Tay, William
- 6 6 9
- Faulkner, Bradley
- Rating Change
1397±64 − 5 = 1392±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1598±44
- Wilson, Paton
- 4 9 −7 7
- 0
- 1804±60
- Glassenbury, Paul
- 7 −7 7 7
- 0
- 1817±48
- Tunbridge, Marc
- 3 −5 11 9
- Fernee, Reuben
- Rating Change
800±150 − 72 = 728±94 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +63
- 707±117
- Hochwald, Anthony
- −9 6 7
- −152
- 653±44
- Farley, Shannon
- 10 4
- +17
- 546±60
- Farley, Jade
- 9 7
- Ferro, Tony
- Rating Change
1412±39 − 13 = 1399±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1422±46
- Howarth, Scott
- −13 8 5 7
- −14
- 1335±31
- Coombes, Julie
- −7 7 5 −5 9
- −8
- 1388±70
- Agocs, Eszter
- 10 −5 −9 3 6
- Fitzsimmons, David
- Rating Change
1403±63 + 3 = 1406±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 1552±42
- Prince, Chris
- 5 5 −7 7
- −29
- 1367±40
- Langley, Claire
- 9 −6 6 −3 9
- −7
- 1507±34
- McDougall, Gary
- 4 5 7
- Fong, Yik Long
- Rating Change
1094±65 + 14 = 1108±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1138±93
- Wang, Ryan
- 2 −11 4 −9 10
- −14
- 1178±69
- Hayter, Steve
- 5 9 6
- +4
- 913±53
- Franklin, Owen
- 9 5 8
- Ford, Susan
- Rating Change
903±84 + 38 = 941±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 884±52
- Grounds, William
- 9 4 −6 9
- −4
- 1191±72
- Grounds, Roger
- 7 5 7
- +9
- 768±57
- Foundas, George
- −9 6 6 4
- Foundas, George
- Rating Change
796±62 − 27 = 769±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 837±66
- Marcus, Ovi
- 6 11 11
- −6
- 940±74
- Ford, Susan
- −9 6 6 4
- −4
- 956±59
- Morrison, Kym
- 4 4 9
- Franklin, Owen
- Rating Change
940±58 − 32 = 908±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −18
- 951±54
- Wooldridge, Katie
- 8 9 7
- −11
- 989±39
- Wu, Bryant
- −8 9 4 8
- −3
- 1097±59
- Fong, Yik Long
- 9 5 8
- Freegard, Anthony
- Rating Change
941±54 + 34 = 975±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1125±60
- Kirsten, Ernie
- −10 −9 10 3 8
- −10
- 1008±71
- Parenti, Stefan
- 10 13 −9 −9 8
- +13
- 940±51
- Bonner, Beverley
- −9 2 −8 6 8
- Fung, Jasmine
- Rating Change
1178±52 + 33 = 1211±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1234±41
- McCloughry, David
- −4 7 10 10
- −2
- 1431±75
- Cook, Stephen Steve
- 3 9 9
- +13
- 1169±57
- Roberts, Tony
- 14 8 −8 6
- Gerges, Youssef
- Rating Change
1005±98 + 6 = 1011±96 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 680±114
- Hochwald, Anthony
- 3 4
- +2
- 667±46
- Farley, Shannon
- 3 2
- 0
- 543±59
- Farley, Jade
- 4 3
- Giang, Kha
- Rating Change
1217±96 − 72 = 1145±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −57
- 1171±43
- Stevels, Mathijs
- 4 −9 −5 8 13
- −10
- 1330±42
- Bungey, Greg
- −10 9 2 6
- −5
- 1365±42
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- 11 11 3
- Glassenbury, Paul
- Rating Change
1801±62 + 4 = 1805±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1685±44
- Pikula, Sandro
- 8 6 7
- −4
- 2053±57
- von Einem, Samuel
- 5 4 4
- 0
- 1391±63
- Faulkner, Bradley
- 7 −7 7 7
- Gliessert, Joel
- Rating Change
1466±53 + 36 = 1502±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1524±54
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- 11 7 8
- +9
- 1394±38
- Smiech, Alex
- 7 8 −11 4
- +4
- 1336±50
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- 8 5 −2 2
- Golobokov, Pavel
- Rating Change
1793±55 − 16 = 1777±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1881±76
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- 5 7 −8 6
- −30
- 1675±46
- Zhang, Michael
- 6 −11 9 9
- −8
- 1849±75
- Swanson, Alex
- 8 −9 11 4
- Grant, Paul
- Rating Change
1428±56 + 27 = 1455±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1404±31
- Aufderheide, Steve
- 5 −5 6 5
- +9
- 1356±34
- Kracht, Jurgen
- 5 5 3
- +2
- 1210±54
- McGregor, Ian
- 3 4 7
- Grounds, Roger
- Rating Change
1187±74 + 9 = 1196±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 965±59
- Morrison, Kym
- 5 6 −14 −9 6
- +4
- 956±74
- Ford, Susan
- 7 5 7
- +1
- 857±62
- Marcus, Ovi
- 12 7 10
- Grounds, William
- Rating Change
931±58 − 57 = 874±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −31
- 815±67
- Marcus, Ovi
- 4 −7 9 9
- −15
- 917±76
- Ford, Susan
- 9 4 −6 9
- −11
- 942±60
- Morrison, Kym
- 6 3 4
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- Rating Change
1400±44 + 11 = 1411±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1491±48
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 10 9 9
- −6
- 1501±41
- Neubauer, Ken
- 6 5 9
- −1
- 1635±42
- Bates, Stephen
- 7 5 4
- Hampel, Bailey
- Rating Change
783±53 − 39 = 744±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −24
- 709±61
- Diem, My
- 12 10 10
- −13
- 787±55
- Nguyen, Bao
- 8 14 8
- −3
- 937±59
- Du, Nghia
- 10 −5 9 −6 9
- Harrison, Keegan
- Rating Change
1410±56 + 36 = 1446±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1561±45
- Sharma, Manoj
- −8 10 −5 7 8
- −24
- 1345±53
- Truong, Jayden
- −8 7 9 9
- +29
- 1538±36
- Du, Phat Tang
- 9 6 8
- Hartnett, Dennis
- Rating Change
1252±41 − 28 = 1224±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1241±33
- Langley, Cynthia
- 3 −7 9 10
- −9
- 1250±38
- Walsh, Dennis
- 4 5 −7 10
- −7
- 1264±39
- Davies, Philip
- 8 8 −7 8
- Hatsitsopanidis, Harry
- Rating Change
1196±52 + 0 = 1196±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1186±37
- Swanbury, James
- 4 11 9
- −18
- 1182±40
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- −9 −5 5 12 7
- +2
- 1001±41
- Vanicky, Jerry
- 9 8 8
- Hayter, Steve
- Rating Change
1166±72 + 29 = 1195±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1119±62
- Fong, Yik Long
- 5 9 6
- +5
- 998±38
- Wu, Bryant
- 6 9 7
- +4
- 971±52
- Wooldridge, Katie
- 6 4 6
- Herman, Alan
- Rating Change
1481±55 − 4 = 1477±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1394±38
- Smiech, Alex
- 10 9 13
- −17
- 1485±53
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- 5 6 6
- +4
- 1335±50
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- 4 10 13
- Hoang, Hung
- Rating Change
1094±60 + 68 = 1162±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +48
- 1399±129
- Al-Boasi, Zee
- 9 −6 11 8
- +18
- 1090±60
- Espartero, Joel
- −7 −10 9 3 5
- +2
- 897±50
- Phung, Chris
- 11 4 10
- Hochwald, Anthony
- Rating Change
800±150 − 154 = 646±108 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −122
- 684±100
- Fernee, Reuben
- −9 6 7
- −29
- 827±62
- Li, Glen
- 7 2
- −4
- 1007±97
- Gerges, Youssef
- 3 4
- Houston, Scott A
- Rating Change
2079±63 + 9 = 2088±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1909±70
- Phan, An
- 7 5 7
- +2
- 1821±70
- Bui, Viet
- 5 7 7
- +1
- 1779±56
- Nguyen, Phi
- −9 8 1 10
- Howarth, Scott
- Rating Change
1404±44 + 1 = 1405±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1369±45
- Fan, Tian Zhang
- 2 8 9
- −13
- 1386±35
- Ferro, Tony
- −13 8 5 7
- +6
- 1350±46
- Le, Su
- 6 7 9
- Hsiao, Tzu-Jui
- Rating Change
1554±37 − 12 = 1542±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1590±41
- Tomas, Dragan
- 11 3 −7 8
- −3
- 1680±47
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- −9 8 3 9
- −2
- 1688±38
- Malyschko, Kevin
- 12 8 4
- Hua, Jordan
- Rating Change
1809±85 − 62 = 1747±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1561±37
- Malyschko, David
- 7 3 9
- −70
- 1590±52
- Millwood, Craig
- −11 7 5 6
- +3
- 1521±38
- Weaver, Richard
- 6 8 5
- Hyland, Bernie
- Rating Change
1068±54 − 25 = 1043±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 1082±95
- Box, David
- −6 8 9 4
- −11
- 1112±41
- Lee, Andrew
- 6 6 10
- Jhaveri, Kettan
- Rating Change
1026±138 − 31 = 995±127 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −28
- 1202±43
- Du, Sally
- 8 7 9
- −2
- 1410±55
- Nguyen, Sinh
- −8 8 8 3
- −1
- 1439±47
- To, Tuan Minh
- −8 10 9 6
- Jin, Ming
- Rating Change
1234±71 + 46 = 1280±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +28
- 1226±34
- Farley, Craig
- 4 −8 −6 8 6
- +15
- 1188±59
- Beal, James
- 9 −8 12 13
- +3
- 1055±47
- McCauley, Andrew
- 2 8 9
- Joshi, Ankit
- Rating Change
1536±45 + 26 = 1562±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1665±46
- Thai, Ha My Trinh
- −8 −7 8 8 9
- −5
- 1654±38
- Luong, Liem
- 7 7 8
- +10
- 1532±36
- Du, Phat Tang
- −9 2 −9 10 5
- Kalaba, Michael
- Rating Change
1616±104 − 111 = 1505±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +40
- 1513±34
- McDougall, Gary
- 6 −5 8 9
- −116
- 1360±39
- Langley, Claire
- 8 −9 6 8
- −35
- 1520±41
- Prince, Chris
- 7 7 8
- Kappellos, Harry
- Rating Change
1448±55 + 31 = 1479±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1619±41
- Tomas, Dragan
- 4 9 8
- −2
- 1683±46
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- 11 10 −12 6
- −2
- 1690±38
- Malyschko, Kevin
- 11 −11 10 7
- Karageorgos, Barbara
- Rating Change
906±77 − 46 = 860±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −36
- 875±58
- Ma, Ayers
- 5 8 6
- −6
- 1060±41
- Pilavci, Omer
- 2 7 2
- −4
- 1086±50
- Sefin, Ahmed
- 5 4 9
- Khuu, Andrew
- Rating Change
1197±71 − 20 = 1177±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1128±72
- Tun, Jason
- 2 13 −7 4
- −52
- 977±69
- Thomson, Anthony
- 8 10 5
- +14
- 1118±64
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- 3 7 2
- Kirsten, Ernie
- Rating Change
1121±61 − 38 = 1083±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 856±49
- Roder, Lenore
- 2 7 −6 8
- −42
- 943±48
- Freegard, Anthony
- −10 −9 10 3 8
- +1
- 819±49
- Davies, Owen
- 8 10 14
- Kracht, Jurgen
- Rating Change
1371±36 − 17 = 1354±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1358±43
- Maddigan, Damien
- 5 −8 −5 9 10
- −5
- 1430±44
- Langhans, Geoffrey
- 12 3 5
- −4
- 1449±53
- Grant, Paul
- 5 5 3
- Langhans, Geoffrey
- Rating Change
1414±46 + 22 = 1436±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1405±31
- Aufderheide, Steve
- 10 0 −7 −9 8
- +7
- 1356±34
- Kracht, Jurgen
- 12 3 5
- +1
- 1211±54
- McGregor, Ian
- 6 −5 9 6
- Langley, Claire
- Rating Change
1351±41 + 30 = 1381±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1578±76
- Kalaba, Michael
- 8 −9 6 8
- −3
- 1491±46
- Rochow, Ian
- 4 −7 8 5
- +13
- 1433±56
- Fitzsimmons, David
- 9 −6 6 −3 9
- Langley, Cynthia
- Rating Change
1231±34 + 18 = 1249±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1233±37
- Hartnett, Dennis
- 3 −7 9 10
- +5
- 1202±41
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- −3 8 4 5
- +4
- 1181±41
- Errington, Glenn A
- 5 11 7
- Langley, Dyson
- Rating Change
1517±37 + 22 = 1539±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1678±43
- Luong, Liem
- −10 −5 5 7 7
- −3
- 1637±44
- Thai, Ha My Trinh
- 8 5 −5 6
- +8
- 1533±37
- Du, Phat Tang
- 12 −8 6 8
- Lau, Henry
- Rating Change
800±150 + 27 = 827±86 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +117
- 913±45
- Thomas, Max
- 3 3 −11 1
- −77
- 841±52
- Burrows, Alana
- −5 −5 4 9 9
- −13
- 960±47
- Bellido, Sebastian
- −6 8 6 −7 6
- Lau, Ivan
- Rating Change
803±44 − 17 = 786±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 836±53
- Burrows, Alana
- 3 6 −9 −8 7
- −5
- 895±44
- Thomas, Max
- 12 −8 9 6
- −2
- 961±48
- Bellido, Sebastian
- −11 1 −4 7 8
- Lau, May Chan
- Rating Change
797±93 − 88 = 709±70 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −61
- 718±49
- Adams, Mike
- 2 6 4
- −17
- 836±58
- Yunos, Naguib
- −7 3 8 6
- −9
- 875±55
- Bellido, Jose
- 10 6 8
- Launder, David
- Rating Change
1354±49 + 0 = 1354±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1327±67
- Mitchell, Phil
- 9 7 9
- −8
- 1429±58
- Dawe, Andrew
- 8 8 9
- −2
- 1540±43
- Lewis, Bill
- 4 −10 2 8
- Lawrie, Daniel
- Rating Change
1203±40 − 11 = 1192±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 930±50
- Nguyen, Jennifer
- 6 4 6
- −9
- 1179±104
- Bui, Nghia
- 8 −6 9 −9 11
- −3
- 1331±57
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 5 8 10
- Lawrie, Lynda
- Rating Change
1139±33 + 9 = 1148±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1155±40
- Darwent, Dawn
- 11 9 10
- −1
- 1335±81
- Cher, Ryan
- 7 9 5
- +2
- 1012±71
- Xu, Peggie
- −9 4 3 11
- Le, Su
- Rating Change
1353±50 − 4 = 1349±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1350±32
- Coombes, Julie
- 6 8 −3 9
- −11
- 1400±71
- Agocs, Eszter
- 8 −9 10 −7 10
- −9
- 1403±38
- Howarth, Scott
- 6 7 9
- Le, Tuan Quang
- Rating Change
995±54 − 39 = 956±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −30
- 865±53
- Phung, Chris
- 13 −9 7 9
- −8
- 1057±58
- Espartero, Joel
- −9 −9 6 7 2
- −1
- 1255±86
- Al-Boasi, Zee
- 6 −4 5 6
- Lee, Andrew
- Rating Change
1126±49 − 9 = 1117±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1132±49
- Ciantar, Robert
- 10 9 −6 −11 6
- −14
- 1123±54
- Teagle, Ken
- −8 6 −8 9 9
- +7
- 1053±53
- Hyland, Bernie
- 6 6 10
- −11
- 1133±56
- Roberts, Tony
- 14 6 −8 −9 4
- −5
- 1214±41
- McCloughry, David
- 6 5 −9 8
- 0
- 1432±75
- Cook, Stephen Steve
- 6 5 10
- Lee, Isaiah
- Rating Change
1754±42 + 7 = 1761±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1639±70
- Millwood, Craig
- 4 9 8
- +2
- 1561±37
- Malyschko, David
- 9 −7 −8 8 6
- +1
- 1522±38
- Weaver, Richard
- 3 9 4
- Lewis, Bill
- Rating Change
1525±43 + 17 = 1542±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1560±76
- Coxon, Andy
- 5 7 6
- +2
- 1370±48
- Von Einem, Tim
- 4 11 5
- +2
- 1354±46
- Launder, David
- 4 −10 2 8
- Li, Glen
- Rating Change
819±65 + 18 = 837±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 713±124
- Hochwald, Anthony
- 7 2
- +6
- 671±48
- Farley, Shannon
- 8 13
- +1
- 544±60
- Farley, Jade
- 8 6
- Li, Jack
- Rating Change
1068±42 + 1 = 1069±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1075±43
- Pilavci, Omer
- 9 −9 5 −7 8
- −10
- 1076±48
- Sefin, Ahmed
- 12 9 7
- +6
- 1006±42
- Vanicky, Jerry
- −8 −9 5 5 1
- −4
- 1174±36
- Swanbury, James
- 4 5 4
- +2
- 901±59
- Ma, Ayers
- −9 8 9 8
- −3
- 1189±40
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- 8 3 9
- Liang, David
- Rating Change
1588±46 − 29 = 1559±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1521±46
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- 7 8 −8 8
- −26
- 1392±50
- Liang, Heng Qian
- −8 9 7 8
- −12
- 1563±45
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- 8 −7 7 7
- Liang, Heng Qian
- Rating Change
1378±56 + 45 = 1423±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +37
- 1581±42
- Liang, David
- −8 9 7 8
- −7
- 1495±41
- Tan, Kok Chong
- −8 5 8 8
- +15
- 1407±57
- Tay, William
- 7 3 11
- Liang, Keyman
- Rating Change
1922±47 + 22 = 1944±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1935±76
- Phan, An
- 8 −6 9 −5 6
- +6
- 1838±78
- Bui, Viet
- 8 7 10
- +3
- 1785±58
- Nguyen, Phi
- 10 13 5
- Lowe, David
- Rating Change
1355±50 − 11 = 1344±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1463±47
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 3 3 −11 −9 3
- −4
- 1503±40
- Neubauer, Ken
- 11 12 7
- −1
- 1635±42
- Bates, Stephen
- 3 12 6
- Lu, Jason
- Rating Change
1568±52 − 6 = 1562±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1530±36
- Du, Phat Tang
- 4 9 5
- −21
- 1527±41
- Sharma, Manoj
- −10 8 6 13
- +2
- 1374±60
- Truong, Jayden
- −7 −2 12 7 4
- Luong, Liem
- Rating Change
1657±41 + 2 = 1659±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1744±33
- Abdilla, George
- 10 3 −10 −5 6
- −19
- 1527±35
- Langley, Dyson
- −10 −5 5 7 7
- +5
- 1574±47
- Joshi, Ankit
- 7 7 8
- Luong, Ninh
- Rating Change
900±61 + 37 = 937±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +37
- 1057±67
- Tan, Yong Han
- −6 −3 3 10 10
- −3
- 1138±44
- Mitev, Thomas
- −8 11 −9 8 7
- +2
- 656±76
- Teale, Miltos
- 5 7 8
- Ma, Ayers
- Rating Change
863±63 + 31 = 894±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 889±70
- Karageorgos, Barbara
- 5 8 6
- −4
- 1067±36
- Li, Jack
- −9 8 9 8
- +12
- 811±54
- Vuong, Tuan
- 7 −9 9 −9 8
- Maddigan, Damien
- Rating Change
1335±44 + 34 = 1369±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1408±31
- Aufderheide, Steve
- 10 2 8
- +12
- 1360±34
- Kracht, Jurgen
- 5 −8 −5 9 10
- +3
- 1215±55
- McGregor, Ian
- −10 9 10 8
- Malyschko, David
- Rating Change
1555±38 + 5 = 1560±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1531±44
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- −7 9 8 9
- −2
- 1743±66
- Hua, Jordan
- 7 3 9
- −1
- 1758±41
- Lee, Isaiah
- 9 −7 −8 8 6
- Malyschko, Kevin
- Rating Change
1686±38 + 5 = 1691±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1547±35
- Hsiao, Tzu-Jui
- 12 8 4
- +1
- 1487±41
- Townsend, Marc
- −7 −8 2 10 9
- +1
- 1481±51
- Kappellos, Harry
- 11 −11 10 7
- Malyschko, Peter
- Rating Change
1472±50 + 28 = 1500±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1520±42
- Neubauer, Ken
- −5 9 6 −9 10
- −4
- 1633±42
- Bates, Stephen
- 10 7 −8 7
- +13
- 1484±48
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 5 11 14
- Marcus, Ovi
- Rating Change
784±76 + 66 = 850±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +49
- 896±52
- Grounds, William
- 4 −7 9 9
- −1
- 1193±72
- Grounds, Roger
- 12 7 10
- +17
- 779±58
- Foundas, George
- 6 11 11
- McArdle, John W
- Rating Change
1335±54 − 7 = 1328±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1202±52
- Panicker, Ajeendra
- −7 8 3 7
- −16
- 1332±79
- Milsom, Lucas
- 9 10 −9 4
- +3
- 1133±43
- Takos, Harry
- 9 −8 −16 9 8
- McCauley, Andrew
- Rating Change
1055±51 + 0 = 1055±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1118±63
- Tan, Ling
- 8 10 −13 −8 11
- −19
- 1021±54
- Sexton, Adam
- −9 6 5 12
- −2
- 1277±66
- Jin, Ming
- 2 8 9
- McCauley, Peter
- Rating Change
1161±52 + 49 = 1210±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1471±123
- Cher, Ryan
- 8 5 −7 −6 9
- +12
- 1153±40
- Darwent, Dawn
- −5 −3 6 6 1
- +3
- 1010±70
- Xu, Peggie
- 5 6 6
- McCloughry, David
- Rating Change
1231±43 − 12 = 1219±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1125±41
- Lee, Andrew
- 6 5 −9 8
- −15
- 1187±50
- Fung, Jasmine
- −4 7 10 10
- −2
- 1391±63
- Chan, Michelle
- 5 5 1
- McDougall, Gary
- Rating Change
1503±35 + 4 = 1507±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1510±48
- Rochow, Ian
- 8 7 −6 9
- −8
- 1471±75
- Kalaba, Michael
- 6 −5 8 9
- +3
- 1414±56
- Fitzsimmons, David
- 4 5 7
- McGregor, Ian
- Rating Change
1221±57 − 9 = 1212±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1368±43
- Maddigan, Damien
- −10 9 10 8
- −2
- 1437±43
- Langhans, Geoffrey
- 6 −5 9 6
- −2
- 1457±52
- Grant, Paul
- 3 4 7
- Mills, Toby
- Rating Change
1019±45 + 8 = 1027±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 892±56
- Bellido, Jose
- 8 9 6
- +3
- 855±61
- Yunos, Naguib
- 7 8 7
- +1
- 737±47
- Adams, Mike
- 7 7 10
- Millwood, Craig
- Rating Change
1583±58 + 43 = 1626±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +38
- 1815±84
- Hua, Jordan
- −11 7 5 6
- −5
- 1757±41
- Lee, Isaiah
- 4 9 8
- +10
- 1528±43
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- 7 9 6
- Milsom, Lucas
- Rating Change
1290±73 + 81 = 1371±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +42
- 1344±52
- McArdle, John W
- 9 10 −9 4
- +33
- 1314±47
- Taylor, Lucjan
- 7 6 8
- +7
- 1163±50
- Bu, Bruce
- 7 5 7
- Mitchell, Phil
- Rating Change
1291±63 + 10 = 1301±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 1388±48
- Von Einem, Tim
- 4 3 8
- −17
- 1342±47
- Launder, David
- 9 7 9
- −2
- 1518±65
- Coxon, Andy
- 9 8 8
- Mitev, Thomas
- Rating Change
1121±43 + 20 = 1141±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1246±81
- Dang, Kevin
- −6 9 9 9
- +2
- 942±59
- Luong, Ninh
- −8 11 −9 8 7
- 0
- 728±87
- Nguyen, Cindy
- 7 6 6
- Morrison, Kym
- Rating Change
937±64 + 18 = 955±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 882±52
- Grounds, William
- 6 3 4
- −3
- 1190±73
- Grounds, Roger
- 5 6 −14 −9 6
- +4
- 766±57
- Foundas, George
- 4 4 9
- Muhammad, Nayil
- Rating Change
963±62 − 27 = 936±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 1013±72
- Thomson, Anthony
- 5 13 −9 10
- −6
- 1097±59
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- −4 5 13 1
- −5
- 1100±70
- Tun, Jason
- 9 4 6
- Neubauer, Ken
- Rating Change
1512±44 − 5 = 1507±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1418±44
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- 6 5 9
- −14
- 1484±47
- Malyschko, Peter
- −5 9 6 −9 10
- +3
- 1350±49
- Lowe, David
- 11 12 7
- Newman, Anya
- Rating Change
696±65 − 7 = 689±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 630±62
- Nguyen, Khiem
- 8 −9 9
- −22
- 707±54
- Du, Nathan
- 10 6
- Newman, Ben
- Rating Change
893±86 + 13 = 906±82 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 727±53
- Du, Nathan
- 8 8
- +3
- 618±59
- Nguyen, Khiem
- 2 0
- Ng, Sheldon
- Rating Change
1167±61 − 21 = 1146±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −19
- 1196±43
- Du, Sally
- 10 −9 3 9
- −2
- 1409±55
- Nguyen, Sinh
- −9 8 −6 6 5
- −1
- 1438±47
- To, Tuan Minh
- 4 8 4
- Nguyen, Bao
- Rating Change
728±66 + 71 = 799±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 796±48
- Woodcock, Thomas
- 9 −9 11 9
- +22
- 778±53
- Zhang, Peter
- 4 5 9
- +15
- 753±50
- Hampel, Bailey
- 8 14 8
- Nguyen, Cindy
- Rating Change
675±109 + 50 = 725±86 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +53
- 681±81
- Teale, Miltos
- 11 4 7
- −3
- 1010±63
- Tan, Yong Han
- −12 6 8 9
- 0
- 1139±44
- Mitev, Thomas
- 7 6 6
- Nguyen, Hung
- Rating Change
804±60 − 13 = 791±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 885±52
- Phung, Chris
- 11 5 6
- −1
- 1069±56
- Espartero, Joel
- 11 5 6
- 0
- 1259±85
- Al-Boasi, Zee
- 2 5 5
- Nguyen, Jennifer
- Rating Change
933±51 − 5 = 928±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 1145±40
- Dashko, Alex
- 6 4 −10 −8 7
- −2
- 1170±52
- Shaughnessy, Graeme
- 8 10 7
- −1
- 1194±34
- Lawrie, Daniel
- 6 4 6
- Nguyen, Khiem
- Rating Change
578±68 + 37 = 615±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +51
- 818±59
- Wauchope, Peter
- 8 −4 7
- −13
- 676±60
- Newman, Anya
- 8 −9 9
- −1
- 903±83
- Newman, Ben
- 2 0
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- Rating Change
1676±48 + 9 = 1685±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1547±35
- Hsiao, Tzu-Jui
- −9 8 3 9
- +2
- 1487±41
- Townsend, Marc
- 3 10 6
- +2
- 1482±51
- Kappellos, Harry
- 11 10 −12 6
- Nguyen, Phi
- Rating Change
1772±62 + 7 = 1779±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1702±32
- Rogers, Mitchell
- 8 6 −4 −9 11
- −6
- 1940±46
- Liang, Keyman
- 10 13 5
- −1
- 2090±61
- Houston, Scott A
- −9 8 1 10
- Nguyen, Ricky
- Rating Change
1318±62 + 19 = 1337±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1198±36
- Lawrie, Daniel
- 5 8 10
- +6
- 1178±54
- Shaughnessy, Graeme
- 13 11 8
- +4
- 1149±41
- Dashko, Alex
- 6 6 3
- Nguyen, Sinh
- Rating Change
1402±56 + 6 = 1408±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1232±52
- Vishwachandra, Chamal
- 9 −7 6 −12 11
- +1
- 1145±57
- Ng, Sheldon
- −9 8 −6 6 5
- 0
- 991±127
- Jhaveri, Kettan
- −8 8 8 3
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- Rating Change
1529±63 − 25 = 1504±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1496±53
- Herman, Alan
- 5 6 6
- −28
- 1481±54
- Gliessert, Joel
- 11 7 8
- −14
- 1550±37
- Wang, Wilsen
- −8 6 8 −10 8
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- Rating Change
1108±66 − 9 = 1099±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 933±57
- Muhammad, Nayil
- −4 5 13 1
- −18
- 1159±59
- Khuu, Andrew
- 3 7 2
- +3
- 896±50
- Phung, Chris
- 6 −9 4 −8 7
- Panicker, Ajeendra
- Rating Change
1196±58 − 1 = 1195±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1170±51
- Bu, Bruce
- −9 4 −6 9 8
- −10
- 1293±46
- Taylor, Lucjan
- 7 6 −6 5
- −6
- 1319±50
- McArdle, John W
- −7 8 3 7
- Parenti, Stefan
- Rating Change
984±78 + 46 = 1030±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 987±54
- Freegard, Anthony
- 10 13 −9 −9 8
- +9
- 861±50
- Roder, Lenore
- −8 9 8 −7 9
- +5
- 822±50
- Davies, Owen
- −7 5 9 −7 6
- Pham, Tony
- Rating Change
826±63 − 19 = 807±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 543±74
- Dissanayake, Savin
- 8 0
- −21
- 804±100
- Curle, Michael
- 9 8
- Phan, An
- Rating Change
1948±87 − 45 = 1903±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1699±31
- Rogers, Mitchell
- 10 −8 5 7
- −42
- 1931±46
- Liang, Keyman
- 8 −6 9 −5 6
- −8
- 2083±62
- Houston, Scott A
- 7 5 7
- Phung, Chris
- Rating Change
872±61 + 29 = 901±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 985±51
- Le, Tuan Quang
- 13 −9 7 9
- −7
- 1025±70
- Thomson, Anthony
- −9 8 3 6
- +9
- 803±59
- Nguyen, Hung
- 11 5 6
- −2
- 1101±58
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- 6 −9 4 −8 7
- −2
- 1107±68
- Tun, Jason
- 3 5 6
- −1
- 1157±67
- Hoang, Hung
- 11 4 10
- Pikula, Sandro
- Rating Change
1680±49 + 0 = 1680±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1847±50
- Tunbridge, Marc
- −5 10 7 −14 6
- −26
- 1581±44
- Wilson, Paton
- 6 −7 9 −5 9
- −5
- 1798±59
- Glassenbury, Paul
- 8 6 7
- Pilavci, Omer
- Rating Change
1071±43 − 10 = 1061±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 863±69
- Karageorgos, Barbara
- 2 7 2
- −13
- 1059±37
- Li, Jack
- 9 −9 5 −7 8
- +1
- 800±52
- Vuong, Tuan
- 4 6 8
- Prince, Chris
- Rating Change
1558±47 − 31 = 1527±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1540±78
- Kalaba, Michael
- 7 7 8
- −26
- 1364±57
- Fitzsimmons, David
- 5 5 −7 7
- −16
- 1475±46
- Rochow, Ian
- −9 19 8 8
- Roberts, Tony
- Rating Change
1153±62 + 0 = 1153±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1129±41
- Lee, Andrew
- 14 6 −8 −9 4
- −17
- 1196±53
- Fung, Jasmine
- 14 8 −8 6
- −2
- 1394±63
- Chan, Michelle
- −9 1 6 6
- Rochow, Ian
- Rating Change
1483±51 + 13 = 1496±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1549±43
- Prince, Chris
- −9 19 8 8
- −14
- 1504±34
- McDougall, Gary
- 8 7 −6 9
- +5
- 1384±44
- Langley, Claire
- 4 −7 8 5
- Roder, Lenore
- Rating Change
875±53 − 19 = 856±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 913±50
- Bonner, Beverley
- 8 5 11
- −4
- 1016±70
- Parenti, Stefan
- −8 9 8 −7 9
- −2
- 1082±56
- Kirsten, Ernie
- 2 7 −6 8
- Rogers, Mitchell
- Rating Change
1705±32 − 8 = 1697±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1764±59
- Nguyen, Phi
- 8 6 −4 −9 11
- −3
- 1804±70
- Bui, Viet
- 5 9 5
- −1
- 1896±69
- Phan, An
- 10 −8 5 7
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- Rating Change
1525±48 − 3 = 1522±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1531±39
- Weaver, Richard
- 5 10 6
- −12
- 1553±37
- Malyschko, David
- −7 9 8 9
- −6
- 1615±58
- Millwood, Craig
- 7 9 6
- Sefin, Ahmed
- Rating Change
1072±48 + 16 = 1088±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1077±37
- Li, Jack
- 12 9 7
- +2
- 863±69
- Karageorgos, Barbara
- 5 4 9
- +1
- 800±52
- Vuong, Tuan
- 11 10 9
- Sexton, Adam
- Rating Change
1029±56 + 13 = 1042±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1069±48
- McCauley, Andrew
- −9 6 5 12
- −6
- 1168±54
- Beal, James
- −9 3 −6 8 7
- −3
- 1219±33
- Farley, Craig
- 9 6 11
- Sharma, Manoj
- Rating Change
1539±45 + 2 = 1541±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1588±52
- Lu, Jason
- −10 8 6 13
- −21
- 1416±51
- Harrison, Keegan
- −8 10 −5 7 8
- +7
- 1477±49
- Zhao, Mark
- 9 7 10
- Shaughnessy, Graeme
- Rating Change
1165±55 + 24 = 1189±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1371±134
- Bui, Nghia
- 9 12 −8 −5 7
- −5
- 1333±56
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 13 11 8
- +1
- 931±50
- Nguyen, Jennifer
- 8 10 7
- Smiech, Alex
- Rating Change
1402±40 − 12 = 1390±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1474±49
- Herman, Alan
- 10 9 13
- −4
- 1494±58
- Gliessert, Joel
- 7 8 −11 4
- −2
- 1555±37
- Wang, Wilsen
- 6 8 8
- Stevels, Mathijs
- Rating Change
1147±46 + 36 = 1183±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1185±80
- Giang, Kha
- 4 −9 −5 8 13
- +12
- 1158±41
- Dashko, Alex
- 6 −7 6 3
- +10
- 1149±42
- Tyas, Robbie
- 9 7 6
- Swanbury, James
- Rating Change
1195±42 − 19 = 1176±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1071±36
- Li, Jack
- 4 5 4
- −14
- 1148±41
- Deutrom, Paul
- 11 12 −4 −6 9
- −9
- 1180±48
- Hatsitsopanidis, Harry
- 4 11 9
- Swanson, Alex
- Rating Change
1878±87 − 15 = 1863±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1782±49
- Golobokov, Pavel
- 8 −9 11 4
- −41
- 1864±60
- Akonor, Solomen
- 14 6 −6 7
- +3
- 1607±64
- Bonner, Steve
- −8 2 −9 10 7
- Takos, Harry
- Rating Change
1147±47 − 18 = 1129±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 1140±52
- Bu, Bruce
- 9 −3 6 −7 8
- −3
- 1296±46
- Taylor, Lucjan
- 4 −9 9 7
- −2
- 1322±50
- McArdle, John W
- 9 −8 −16 9 8
- Tan, Kok Chong
- Rating Change
1488±44 + 15 = 1503±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1529±46
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- 5 10 8
- −7
- 1571±46
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- −8 7 9 10
- +7
- 1435±52
- Liang, Heng Qian
- −8 5 8 8
- Tan, Ling
- Rating Change
1085±69 − 2 = 1083±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +40
- 1232±34
- Farley, Craig
- 6 7 −4 −8 9
- −33
- 1035±48
- McCauley, Andrew
- 8 10 −13 −8 11
- −9
- 1164±55
- Beal, James
- −8 7 8 −8 8
- Tan, Yong Han
- Rating Change
1064±70 − 55 = 1009±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 729±87
- Nguyen, Cindy
- −12 6 8 9
- −51
- 901±58
- Luong, Ninh
- −6 −3 3 10 10
- −7
- 1176±70
- Dang, Kevin
- 10 4 −10 10
- Taneja, Pranjay
- Rating Change
785±46 + 11 = 796±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 880±58
- Burrows, Alana
- 7 −8 −9 4 10
- −6
- 896±44
- Thomas, Max
- 5 7 10
- −2
- 961±48
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 6 −8 6 6
- Tay, William
- Rating Change
1426±64 − 39 = 1387±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −25
- 1407±51
- Liang, Heng Qian
- 7 3 11
- −9
- 1506±45
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- 12 10 −10 7
- −4
- 1574±46
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- 6 6 9
- Taylor, Lucjan
- Rating Change
1304±49 − 1 = 1303±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1204±52
- Panicker, Ajeendra
- 7 6 −6 5
- −11
- 1338±80
- Milsom, Lucas
- 7 6 8
- +3
- 1133±43
- Takos, Harry
- 4 −9 9 7
- Teagle, Ken
- Rating Change
1116±54 + 37 = 1153±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1190±100
- Box, David
- 8 5 −9 8
- +16
- 1132±42
- Lee, Andrew
- −8 6 −8 9 9
- Teale, Miltos
- Rating Change
690±86 − 38 = 652±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −35
- 673±108
- Nguyen, Cindy
- 11 4 7
- −3
- 935±57
- Luong, Ninh
- 5 7 8
- 0
- 1188±67
- Dang, Kevin
- 8 3 9
- Thai, Ha My Trinh
- Rating Change
1670±50 − 27 = 1643±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1545±36
- Langley, Dyson
- 8 5 −5 6
- −26
- 1547±42
- Joshi, Ankit
- −8 −7 8 8 9
- −7
- 1728±32
- Abdilla, George
- −7 5 6 5
- Thomas, Cam
- Rating Change
666±50 + 18 = 684±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 759±49
- Adams, Mike
- 4 10 −8 7
- −3
- 845±58
- Yunos, Naguib
- 8 −8 −7 8 10
- −2
- 882±54
- Bellido, Jose
- 6 5 4
- Thomas, Max
- Rating Change
902±46 − 8 = 894±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 799±44
- Taneja, Pranjay
- 5 7 10
- −20
- 713±116
- Lau, Henry
- 3 3 −11 1
- +5
- 792±42
- Lau, Ivan
- 12 −8 9 6
- Thomson, Anthony
- Rating Change
914±83 + 125 = 1039±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +89
- 1225±68
- Khuu, Andrew
- 8 10 5
- +24
- 949±58
- Muhammad, Nayil
- 5 13 −9 10
- +12
- 907±50
- Phung, Chris
- −9 8 3 6
- To, Tuan Minh
- Rating Change
1434±48 + 3 = 1437±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1230±51
- Vishwachandra, Chamal
- 6 7 −4 10
- +1
- 1144±57
- Ng, Sheldon
- 4 8 4
- 0
- 990±127
- Jhaveri, Kettan
- −8 10 9 6
- Tomas, Dragan
- Rating Change
1636±45 − 38 = 1598±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1548±35
- Hsiao, Tzu-Jui
- 11 3 −7 8
- −24
- 1445±53
- Kappellos, Harry
- 4 9 8
- −22
- 1464±42
- Townsend, Marc
- 6 12 −13 −8 9
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- Rating Change
1344±53 − 12 = 1332±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1478±49
- Herman, Alan
- 4 10 13
- −4
- 1498±59
- Gliessert, Joel
- 8 5 −2 2
- −2
- 1556±37
- Wang, Wilsen
- 8 10 7
- Townsend, Marc
- Rating Change
1467±43 + 18 = 1485±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1619±41
- Tomas, Dragan
- 6 12 −13 −8 9
- −1
- 1683±46
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- 3 10 6
- −1
- 1689±38
- Malyschko, Kevin
- −7 −8 2 10 9
- Tran, Duy
- Rating Change
878±72 + 30 = 908±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 922±110
- Curle, Michael
- 6 12
- +1
- 542±74
- Dissanayake, Savin
- 7 2
- Truong, Jayden
- Rating Change
1318±49 + 63 = 1381±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1495±48
- Zhao, Mark
- −7 10 6 −6 6
- −2
- 1567±46
- Lu, Jason
- −7 −2 12 7 4
- +34
- 1489±67
- Harrison, Keegan
- −8 7 9 9
- Tun, Jason
- Rating Change
1114±77 − 11 = 1103±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 933±57
- Muhammad, Nayil
- 9 4 6
- −24
- 1159±59
- Khuu, Andrew
- 2 13 −7 4
- +5
- 896±50
- Phung, Chris
- 3 5 6
- Tunbridge, Marc
- Rating Change
1850±51 − 35 = 1815±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1391±62
- Faulkner, Bradley
- 3 −5 11 9
- −33
- 1649±53
- Pikula, Sandro
- −5 10 7 −14 6
- −2
- 2052±58
- von Einem, Samuel
- 6 7 7
- Tyas, Robbie
- Rating Change
1125±43 + 15 = 1140±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1359±43
- Bungey, Greg
- 8 8 6
- −8
- 1175±44
- Stevels, Mathijs
- 9 7 6
- −1
- 1367±42
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- −5 −2 6 9 8
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- Rating Change
1836±77 − 3 = 1833±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +38
- 1916±69
- Akonor, Solomen
- 12 9 8
- −44
- 1755±49
- Golobokov, Pavel
- 5 7 −8 6
- +3
- 1608±64
- Bonner, Steve
- 4 −9 4 9
- Vanicky, Jerry
- Rating Change
1012±44 − 13 = 999±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1062±37
- Li, Jack
- −8 −9 5 5 1
- −3
- 1159±40
- Deutrom, Paul
- 4 5 9
- −2
- 1193±47
- Hatsitsopanidis, Harry
- 9 8 8
- Verrusio, Adrian
- Rating Change
1506±52 − 37 = 1469±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1350±49
- Lowe, David
- 3 3 −11 −9 3
- −28
- 1394±41
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- 10 9 9
- −14
- 1486±47
- Malyschko, Peter
- 5 11 14
- Vishwachandra, Chamal
- Rating Change
1264±57 − 35 = 1229±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −28
- 1189±42
- Du, Sally
- 8 6 7
- −4
- 1405±56
- Nguyen, Sinh
- 9 −7 6 −12 11
- −2
- 1436±48
- To, Tuan Minh
- 6 7 −4 10
- von Einem, Samuel
- Rating Change
2050±58 + 4 = 2054±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1819±49
- Tunbridge, Marc
- 6 7 7
- +2
- 1809±64
- Glassenbury, Paul
- 5 4 4
- 0
- 1600±43
- Wilson, Paton
- 1 5 6
- Von Einem, Tim
- Rating Change
1408±52 − 43 = 1365±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −28
- 1274±53
- Mitchell, Phil
- 4 3 8
- −11
- 1423±59
- Dawe, Andrew
- 8 6 6
- −3
- 1538±43
- Lewis, Bill
- 4 11 5
- Vuong, Tuan
- Rating Change
814±55 − 13 = 801±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 884±58
- Ma, Ayers
- 7 −9 9 −9 8
- −1
- 1062±40
- Pilavci, Omer
- 4 6 8
- −1
- 1088±50
- Sefin, Ahmed
- 11 10 9
- Walsh, Dennis
- Rating Change
1260±41 − 2 = 1258±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1231±37
- Hartnett, Dennis
- 4 5 −7 10
- −16
- 1177±40
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- −5 4 9 −4 9
- +5
- 1179±41
- Errington, Glenn A
- −10 9 −9 3 8
- Wang, Ryan
- Rating Change
1092±106 − 4 = 1088±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1000±38
- Wu, Bryant
- 10 −7 3 −7 12
- −54
- 1086±59
- Fong, Yik Long
- 2 −11 4 −9 10
- +17
- 974±52
- Wooldridge, Katie
- 5 4 −9 −11 14
- Wang, Wilsen
- Rating Change
1547±37 + 9 = 1556±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1515±54
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- −8 6 8 −10 8
- +2
- 1391±37
- Smiech, Alex
- 6 8 8
- +1
- 1333±50
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- 8 10 7
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- Rating Change
1534±51 − 26 = 1508±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1391±56
- Tay, William
- 12 10 −10 7
- −20
- 1486±41
- Tan, Kok Chong
- 5 10 8
- −11
- 1549±42
- Liang, David
- 7 8 −8 8
- Wauchope, Peter
- Rating Change
807±61 − 29 = 778±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 733±54
- Du, Nathan
- 8 6
- −44
- 566±65
- Nguyen, Khiem
- 8 −4 7
- Weaver, Richard
- Rating Change
1532±39 − 13 = 1519±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1506±44
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- 5 10 6
- −1
- 1744±65
- Hua, Jordan
- 6 8 5
- −1
- 1758±40
- Lee, Isaiah
- 3 9 4
- Wilson, Paton
- Rating Change
1578±44 + 24 = 1602±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1700±41
- Pikula, Sandro
- 6 −7 9 −5 9
- 0
- 2055±57
- von Einem, Samuel
- 1 5 6
- +2
- 1396±64
- Faulkner, Bradley
- 4 9 −7 7
- Woodcock, Thomas
- Rating Change
830±51 − 47 = 783±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −27
- 703±61
- Diem, My
- −7 5 8 6
- −16
- 782±55
- Nguyen, Bao
- 9 −9 11 9
- −4
- 933±59
- Du, Nghia
- 9 9 6
- Wooldridge, Katie
- Rating Change
962±57 + 3 = 965±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 922±54
- Franklin, Owen
- 8 9 7
- −8
- 1072±79
- Wang, Ryan
- 5 4 −9 −11 14
- −2
- 1189±68
- Hayter, Steve
- 6 4 6
- Wu, Bryant
- Rating Change
996±40 − 2 = 994±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 919±54
- Franklin, Owen
- −8 9 4 8
- −6
- 1065±80
- Wang, Ryan
- 10 −7 3 −7 12
- −2
- 1187±69
- Hayter, Steve
- 6 9 7
- Xu, Peggie
- Rating Change
1026±75 − 21 = 1005±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1147±33
- Lawrie, Lynda
- −9 4 3 11
- −6
- 1205±49
- McCauley, Peter
- 5 6 6
- −1
- 1321±57
- Costabile, Maurizio
- 5 3 5
- Yunos, Naguib
- Rating Change
836±62 + 10 = 846±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 728±74
- Lau, May Chan
- −7 3 8 6
- −5
- 1024±44
- Mills, Toby
- 7 8 7
- +5
- 685±47
- Thomas, Cam
- 8 −8 −7 8 10
- Zhang, Michael
- Rating Change
1667±48 + 31 = 1698±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 1802±51
- Golobokov, Pavel
- 6 −11 9 9
- −2
- 1881±59
- Akonor, Solomen
- 12 −10 8 7
- +8
- 1625±68
- Bonner, Steve
- −1 8 8 6
- Zhang, Peter
- Rating Change
775±57 − 5 = 770±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 756±59
- Diem, My
- 10 −9 10 8
- −17
- 789±55
- Nguyen, Bao
- 4 5 9
- −4
- 937±58
- Du, Nghia
- 9 11 7
- Zhao, Mark
- Rating Change
1479±53 − 15 = 1464±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1535±36
- Du, Phat Tang
- 5 −9 −6 1 7
- −31
- 1338±50
- Truong, Jayden
- −7 10 6 −6 6
- −9
- 1533±41
- Sharma, Manoj
- 9 7 10
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 213. Matches: 324. Club: Table Tennis South Australia. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bungey, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 25607. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-01 3:46 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-04-28 11:40 pm EDT.