TTSA Winter Pennant (Jul 10-11) Round 10
2017-08-16
Detailed Report
- Abbas, Alice
- Rating Change
1478±35 − 1 = 1477±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1437±34
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 1 −10 −8 3 6
- −5
- 1550±35
- Neubauer, Ken
- 8 5 9
- −2
- 1610±31
- Bates, Stephen
- 5 9 2
- Adams, Mike
- Rating Change
732±39 − 5 = 727±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 868±37
- Thomas, Max
- 2 −6 8 11
- −2
- 911±40
- Burrows, Alana
- 6 6 9
- −1
- 988±38
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 7 1 0
- Agocs, Eszter
- Rating Change
1366±45 − 22 = 1344±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1190±49
- McGregor, Ian
- 9 2 −7 7
- −19
- 1301±32
- Kracht, Jurgen
- 6 9 6
- −7
- 1420±29
- Aufderheide, Steve
- −8 5 5 −6 6
- Akhurst, Matthew
- Rating Change
1400±119 + 6 = 1406±118 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1116±44
- Hoang, Hung
- 8 3 −4 5
- +1
- 972±42
- Le, Tuan Quang
- −7 8 3 4
- 0
- 846±49
- Nguyen, Hung
- 9 1 7
- Akonor, Solomen
- Rating Change
1860±48 + 13 = 1873±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1786±34
- Walker, Trevor
- −5 8 −8 3 9
- +5
- 1756±39
- Ford, Frank
- 6 3 12
- 0
- 1539±31
- Stevels, Lenno
- 4 7 −10 −9 7
- Al-Boasi, Zee
- Rating Change
1274±63 + 8 = 1282±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1085±40
- Sefin, Ahmed
- 6 6 9
- +4
- 1082±45
- Vernik, Kamilo
- 5 6 7
- An, Hong
- Rating Change
1103±61 − 33 = 1070±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 1136±45
- Tan, Ling
- 8 8 12
- −9
- 1186±38
- Jin, Ming
- 8 13 6
- −7
- 1188±52
- Rednam, Rajesh
- 15 −5 11 8
- Andreoni, Eric
- Rating Change
1217±42 + 18 = 1235±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1282±41
- Bui, Nghia
- 6 8 −8 −9 11
- −2
- 1416±33
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 10 −12 8 6
- +4
- 1121±49
- Nguyen, Thoi
- 3 7 9
- Aufderheide, Steve
- Rating Change
1411±29 + 12 = 1423±29 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1421±37
- Howarth, Scott
- −6 5 6 11
- +3
- 1351±42
- Agocs, Eszter
- −8 5 5 −6 6
- +3
- 1336±33
- Coombes, Julie
- 7 4 −11 7
- Bates, Edward
- Rating Change
661±67 − 23 = 638±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 540±48
- Nguyen, Khiem
- 7 9
- −22
- 687±42
- Du, Nathan
- −6 8 9
- −13
- 724±44
- Bui, Anthony
- 7 8
- Bates, Stephen
- Rating Change
1604±36 + 8 = 1612±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1622±42
- Tomas, Dragan
- 9 8 7
- −6
- 1652±37
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- −4 −9 5 8 5
- +7
- 1603±37
- Liang, David
- −6 −7 7 12 8
- −5
- 1665±32
- Malyschko, Kevin
- 6 8 −10 8
- +2
- 1478±33
- Abbas, Alice
- 5 9 2
- +2
- 1465±33
- Tan, Kok Chong
- 10 4 −5 3
- Beames, Max
- Rating Change
800±150 + 12 = 812±91 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +86
- 799±52
- Boxall, Joshua
- 3 9
- −66
- 873±56
- Li, Glen
- 7 10
- −8
- 1054±95
- Gerges, Youssef
- 4 5
- Bellido, Jose
- Rating Change
876±46 − 3 = 873±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 927±43
- Burrows, Alana
- 5 8 −4 −3 9
- −15
- 861±37
- Thomas, Max
- 7 4 8
- −4
- 985±38
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 4 7 9
- Bellido, Sebastian
- Rating Change
972±37 + 16 = 988±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 935±44
- Shaughnessy, Kelly
- 7 −11 −8 8 6
- +4
- 878±42
- Bellido, Jose
- 4 7 9
- +3
- 858±42
- Roder, Lenore
- 6 6 8
- +2
- 826±47
- Davies, Owen
- 3 10 9
- +2
- 824±40
- Yunos, Naguib
- 3 7 9
- 0
- 728±38
- Adams, Mike
- 7 1 0
- Bohdan, Victor
- Rating Change
1061±81 − 20 = 1041±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1013±40
- Kirsten, Ernie
- −5 5 11 −10 9
- −47
- 978±44
- Parenti, Stefan
- −3 9 9 −8 8
- +5
- 863±44
- Bonner, Beverley
- 1 9 5
- Bonner, Beverley
- Rating Change
865±44 − 4 = 861±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 1039±60
- Bohdan, Victor
- 1 9 5
- −1
- 1096±56
- Phung, Chris
- 4 7 8
- 0
- 1231±52
- Khuu, Andrew
- 7 10 8
- Boxall, Joshua
- Rating Change
785±53 − 5 = 780±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 723±119
- Milograd, Marc
- 5 9
- −16
- 723±119
- Beames, Max
- 3 9
- +2
- 555±65
- Turrell, Luke
- 6 9
- Brice, Mika
- Rating Change
754±91 − 10 = 744±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 703±42
- Du, Nathan
- 7 7
- −52
- 720±44
- Bui, Anthony
- −8 3 4
- +5
- 536±48
- Nguyen, Khiem
- 3 4
- Bu, Bruce
- Rating Change
1105±46 + 17 = 1122±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1233±36
- Davies, Philip
- −8 8 −6 6 9
- −4
- 1247±32
- Langley, Cynthia
- 8 −12 6 3
- −2
- 1285±36
- Walsh, Dennis
- 8 3 −12 −3 11
- Bui, Anthony
- Rating Change
734±47 + 3 = 737±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 794±78
- Brice, Mika
- −8 3 4
- −20
- 649±57
- Dissanayake, Savin
- −5 9 8
- +7
- 655±59
- Bates, Edward
- 7 8
- Bui, Nghia
- Rating Change
1266±42 + 2 = 1268±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1325±50
- Cook, Stephen Steve
- 8 6 3
- −15
- 1220±41
- Andreoni, Eric
- 6 8 −8 −9 11
- +3
- 1115±44
- Roberts, Tony
- 9 3 −9 9
- 0
- 691±39
- Thomas, Cam
- 5 6 9
- Bungey, Greg
- Rating Change
1339±38 − 20 = 1319±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −18
- 1157±39
- Takos, Harry
- 9 −9 8 7
- −2
- 1490±64
- Milsom, Lucas
- 8 6 8
- −1
- 1657±167
- Ruanglertboon, Warit Will
- 6 −9 −7 10 8
- Burrows, Alana
- Rating Change
921±44 − 9 = 912±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 826±41
- Yunos, Naguib
- −11 2 7 4
- −17
- 857±42
- Bellido, Jose
- 5 8 −4 −3 9
- +2
- 728±38
- Adams, Mike
- 6 6 9
- Burrows, Hayden
- Rating Change
908±62 − 37 = 871±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 741±41
- Diem, My
- 6 5 4
- −29
- 856±40
- Nguyen, Bao
- 9 9 −6 9
- −14
- 922±42
- Du, Nghia
- 9 −9 6 20
- Campbell, Brooke
- Rating Change
761±40 + 19 = 780±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 846±45
- Lau, Ivan
- −6 3 9 3
- −7
- 808±38
- Taneja, Pranjay
- 5 10 −4 −7 7
- +12
- 825±50
- Luksch, Eric
- −9 11 7 6
- Cao, Kenny
- Rating Change
799±94 − 2 = 797±94 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −1
- 1166±35
- Deutrom, Paul
- 6 5 7
- 0
- 1248±48
- Pankiewicz, Paul
- 6 6 6
- 0
- 1269±47
- Hatsitsopanidis, Harry
- 3 −7 6 5
- Chandrasena, Samadhi
- Rating Change
1071±46 − 7 = 1064±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1217±35
- Davies, Philip
- −7 3 8 4
- −2
- 1248±32
- Langley, Cynthia
- 13 −10 9 9
- −1
- 1285±36
- Walsh, Dennis
- −11 7 8 −9 8
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- Rating Change
1380±33 + 11 = 1391±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1524±34
- McDonald, Dale
- −5 −8 5 3 9
- −3
- 1486±64
- Milsom, Lucas
- −7 7 7 9
- +5
- 1345±37
- Maddigan, Damien
- 6 9 10
- −3
- 1490±39
- Grant, Paul
- 5 −14 8 −14 5
- +1
- 1178±40
- Takos, Harry
- 8 2 5
- −1
- 1648±170
- Ruanglertboon, Warit Will
- 4 7 9
- Cher, Albert
- Rating Change
1042±53 + 50 = 1092±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1126±51
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- 8 7 −6 5
- +18
- 1072±48
- Tun, Jason
- 4 6 10
- +6
- 961±51
- Thomson, Anthony
- 9 6 5
- Cher, Ryan
- Rating Change
1389±56 + 8 = 1397±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1238±38
- Mills, Paul
- 9 −7 −4 8 8
- +2
- 1170±38
- Dashko, Alex
- 1 7 4
- +2
- 1164±45
- Shaughnessy, Graeme
- 9 7 8
- Ciantar, Robert
- Rating Change
1118±39 + 28 = 1146±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1179±34
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- −7 9 6 4
- +9
- 1132±38
- Swanbury, James
- 9 5 −10 7
- +4
- 1056±47
- Vanicky, Jerry
- 9 7 6
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- Rating Change
1184±36 − 15 = 1169±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1181±37
- Teagle, Ken
- 6 5 7
- −14
- 1070±41
- Hyland, Bernie
- −8 6 −8 8 7
- −10
- 1134±37
- Ciantar, Robert
- −7 9 6 4
- Cook, Stephen Steve
- Rating Change
1294±49 + 10 = 1304±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1430±35
- Nguyen, Ricky
- −3 −5 11 8 13
- −19
- 1255±39
- Bui, Nghia
- 8 6 3
- +2
- 1117±48
- Nguyen, Thoi
- 5 −6 7 −5 7
- Coombes, Julie
- Rating Change
1327±33 + 6 = 1333±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1316±32
- Kracht, Jurgen
- 9 10 −9 −5 9
- −3
- 1421±29
- Aufderheide, Steve
- 7 4 −11 7
- +2
- 1192±49
- McGregor, Ian
- 12 3 8
- Costabile, Maurizio
- Rating Change
1316±47 + 10 = 1326±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1186±36
- Hartnett, Dennis
- 9 6 −9 13
- +3
- 1168±36
- Deutrom, Paul
- 1 −3 4 8
- +2
- 1142±36
- Errington, Glenn A
- 10 9 8
- Coxon, Andy
- Rating Change
1467±41 − 6 = 1461±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1383±38
- Le, Su
- 9 −8 −8 8 6
- −16
- 1392±33
- Ferro, Tony
- 8 −10 3 4
- +4
- 1361±40
- Nottle, Melissa
- −3 9 7 −9 10
- Dang, Kevin
- Rating Change
1135±51 + 0 = 1135±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 809±46
- Grounds, William
- 5 4 5
- 0
- 797±47
- Foundas, George
- −7 −11 3 7 7
- Dashko, Alex
- Rating Change
1153±36 + 15 = 1168±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1275±38
- Siu, Leon
- −4 −8 8 10 9
- −1
- 1395±55
- Cher, Ryan
- 1 7 4
- +2
- 1003±51
- Xu, Peggie
- 12 10 5
- Davies, Owen
- Rating Change
837±50 − 14 = 823±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 933±46
- Ford, Susan
- 8 −6 3 −8 7
- −4
- 985±45
- Morrison, Kym
- 5 −12 7 −9 6
- −3
- 987±38
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 3 10 9
- Davies, Philip
- Rating Change
1230±37 − 12 = 1218±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1067±44
- Chandrasena, Samadhi
- −7 3 8 4
- −15
- 1099±45
- Bu, Bruce
- −8 8 −6 6 9
- +1
- 1008±49
- Wang, Ryan
- 7 4 5
- Deutrom, Paul
- Rating Change
1166±40 + 1 = 1167±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1200±69
- Miller, Shane
- 8 8 6
- −5
- 1258±46
- McCauley, Peter
- −10 7 6 −11 2
- 0
- 798±94
- Cao, Kenny
- 6 5 7
- −2
- 1323±46
- Costabile, Maurizio
- 1 −3 4 8
- 0
- 795±93
- Duong, Bill
- 9 −8 6 5
- −1
- 1396±73
- Le, Triet
- 8 3 6
- Diem, My
- Rating Change
732±43 + 5 = 737±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 699±40
- Thomas, Cam
- 10 −10 4 3
- −4
- 865±53
- Burrows, Hayden
- 6 5 4
- 0
- 1021±41
- Mills, Toby
- 2 3 7
- Dissanayake, Savin
- Rating Change
603±60 + 80 = 683±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +41
- 753±45
- Bui, Anthony
- −5 9 8
- +32
- 713±42
- Du, Nathan
- −7 9 8
- +7
- 543±48
- Nguyen, Khiem
- 5 7
- Du, Daniel
- Rating Change
654±41 + 18 = 672±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 709±42
- Farley, Shannon
- 11 −4 3
- +2
- 503±60
- Farley, Jade
- 4 7
- +1
- 431±81
- Morrison, James
- 11 10
- Du, Nathan
- Rating Change
713±45 − 17 = 696±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 658±59
- Bates, Edward
- −6 8 9
- −17
- 652±58
- Dissanayake, Savin
- −7 9 8
- −9
- 718±76
- Brice, Mika
- 7 7
- Du, Nghia
- Rating Change
928±44 + 2 = 930±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 884±54
- Burrows, Hayden
- 9 −9 6 20
- −6
- 1016±41
- Mills, Toby
- 5 −9 9 2
- Du, Phat Tang
- Rating Change
1542±41 − 14 = 1528±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1522±33
- Rochow, Ian
- −4 8 4 −8 8
- −13
- 1503±32
- Lewis, Bill
- 8 −9 7 4
- −10
- 1515±41
- Kalaba, Michael
- 10 4 −9 6
- Du, Sally
- Rating Change
1291±40 + 0 = 1291±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1338±41
- McArdle, John W
- 7 −7 −3 9 14
- −12
- 1260±40
- Taylor, Lucjan
- 7 −8 8 −6 7
- Duong, Bill
- Rating Change
796±94 − 2 = 794±93 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −1
- 1166±35
- Deutrom, Paul
- 9 −8 6 5
- 0
- 1248±48
- Pankiewicz, Paul
- 5 3 5
- 0
- 1269±47
- Hatsitsopanidis, Harry
- 1 4 5
- Errington, Glenn A
- Rating Change
1135±38 + 7 = 1142±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1206±69
- Miller, Shane
- 5 7 9
- −3
- 1260±47
- McCauley, Peter
- 7 8 8
- −1
- 1324±46
- Costabile, Maurizio
- 10 9 8
- Espartero, Joel
- Rating Change
1114±48 − 7 = 1107±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1091±47
- Vernik, Kamilo
- 8 5 9
- −18
- 1072±37
- Sefin, Ahmed
- −8 8 −8 7 7
- Farley, Jade
- Rating Change
503±60 − 5 = 498±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 670±40
- Du, Daniel
- 4 7
- 0
- 879±51
- Pham, Tony
- 9 9
- 0
- 901±55
- Tran, Duy
- 3 4
- Farley, Shannon
- Rating Change
714±45 − 20 = 694±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 659±40
- Du, Daniel
- 11 −4 3
- −2
- 875±52
- Pham, Tony
- 8 6
- −2
- 898±56
- Tran, Duy
- 7 3
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- Rating Change
1567±38 − 5 = 1562±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1483±37
- Zhao, Mark
- −10 −6 9 8 5
- −11
- 1535±35
- Lu, Jason
- 6 7 9
- +2
- 1426±36
- Harrison, Keegan
- 8 9 3
- Faulkner, Bradley
- Rating Change
1384±67 − 2 = 1382±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 1669±39
- Zhang, Michael
- 6 7 −9 7
- 0
- 1814±48
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- −8 7 7 1
- Ferro, Tony
- Rating Change
1395±36 + 7 = 1402±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1476±40
- Coxon, Andy
- 8 −10 3 4
- −8
- 1393±37
- Von Einem, Tim
- 7 8 7
- +3
- 1307±37
- Lowe, David
- 12 −6 10 5
- Ford, Frank
- Rating Change
1768±42 − 15 = 1753±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1765±45
- Golobokov, Pavel
- 9 8 −8 9
- −4
- 1869±46
- Akonor, Solomen
- 6 3 12
- Ford, Susan
- Rating Change
939±50 − 3 = 936±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 860±42
- Roder, Lenore
- 8 −9 8 12
- −18
- 912±44
- Shaughnessy, Kelly
- 12 9 9
- +6
- 828±47
- Davies, Owen
- 8 −6 3 −8 7
- Foundas, George
- Rating Change
785±51 + 10 = 795±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 755±52
- Nguyen, Cindy
- 3 −9 6 10
- −2
- 1012±46
- Luong, Ninh
- 2 4 6
- 0
- 1135±51
- Dang, Kevin
- −7 −11 3 7 7
- Gerges, Youssef
- Rating Change
1044±96 + 11 = 1055±93 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 815±96
- Beames, Max
- 4 5
- +2
- 679±109
- Milograd, Marc
- 2 4
- 0
- 552±63
- Turrell, Luke
- 6 4
- Giang, Kha
- Rating Change
1181±56 + 2 = 1183±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1119±39
- Northeast, Tania
- 5 9 6
- −9
- 1274±41
- Hagel, Scott
- −9 −9 6 10 9
- Golobokov, Pavel
- Rating Change
1747±44 + 30 = 1777±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1792±34
- Walker, Trevor
- −8 10 6 4
- +12
- 1763±40
- Ford, Frank
- 9 8 −8 9
- +1
- 1539±31
- Stevels, Lenno
- 2 6 7
- Grant, Paul
- Rating Change
1483±42 + 13 = 1496±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1523±45
- Herman, Alan
- 9 9 9
- −5
- 1594±41
- Wang, Wilsen
- 5 3 6
- +4
- 1394±32
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- 5 −14 8 −14 5
- Grounds, William
- Rating Change
799±49 + 9 = 808±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 753±52
- Nguyen, Cindy
- 11 3 10
- −2
- 1011±46
- Luong, Ninh
- 7 8 9
- 0
- 1135±51
- Dang, Kevin
- 5 4 5
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- Rating Change
1421±38 + 1 = 1422±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1375±33
- Langley, Claire
- 7 10 6
- −5
- 1491±32
- McDougall, Gary
- 6 −14 5 12
- Hagel, Scott
- Rating Change
1265±42 + 13 = 1278±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1191±53
- Giang, Kha
- −9 −9 6 10 9
- +5
- 1175±38
- Tyas, Robbie
- 7 4 8
- +2
- 1076±49
- Hock, Steve
- 7 7 9
- Hampel, Bailey
- Rating Change
796±41 − 15 = 781±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 648±50
- Wang, Yanan
- 10 2 6
- −14
- 755±34
- Vishwachandra, Mihiri
- −8 10 7 −9 7
- −5
- 873±68
- Pearce, Bob
- −9 2 7 −3 6
- Harrison, Keegan
- Rating Change
1422±38 + 2 = 1424±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1433±36
- Liang, Heng Qian
- −9 −7 6 9 9
- −5
- 1506±36
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- 10 9 7
- −2
- 1561±35
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- 8 9 3
- Hartnett, Dennis
- Rating Change
1199±38 − 19 = 1180±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1125±71
- Miller, Shane
- −8 4 7 7
- −5
- 1256±46
- McCauley, Peter
- 5 6 4
- −2
- 1322±46
- Costabile, Maurizio
- 9 6 −9 13
- Hatsitsopanidis, Harry
- Rating Change
1278±53 − 8 = 1270±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 797±94
- Cao, Kenny
- 3 −7 6 5
- −8
- 1387±73
- Le, Triet
- 7 9 7
- 0
- 795±93
- Duong, Bill
- 1 4 5
- Herman, Alan
- Rating Change
1505±44 + 1 = 1506±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1518±35
- McDonald, Dale
- 10 6 1
- −13
- 1483±39
- Grant, Paul
- 9 9 9
- +2
- 1340±36
- Maddigan, Damien
- 4 5 −9 −3 9
- Hoang, Hung
- Rating Change
1106±46 + 12 = 1118±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1074±78
- Marlu, Greg
- −9 5 7 −10 6
- −1
- 1401±119
- Akhurst, Matthew
- 8 3 −4 5
- +4
- 990±40
- Wu, Bryant
- −10 7 −6 6 8
- Hock, Steve
- Rating Change
1093±53 − 18 = 1075±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 1105±37
- Northeast, Tania
- 11 9 6
- −2
- 1277±41
- Hagel, Scott
- 7 7 9
- Houston, Scott A
- Rating Change
2120±65 + 28 = 2148±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 2144±68
- Langley, Paul
- 9 −6 −8 6 11
- +2
- 1884±53
- Tunbridge, Marc
- −9 4 4 8
- Howarth, Scott
- Rating Change
1416±38 − 4 = 1412±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1313±32
- Kracht, Jurgen
- 8 −9 −6 7 7
- −9
- 1418±29
- Aufderheide, Steve
- −6 5 6 11
- +1
- 1189±49
- McGregor, Ian
- 0 −9 8 6
- Hua, Jordan
- Rating Change
1693±45 − 10 = 1683±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1761±44
- Luong, Liem
- 10 −9 9 8
- −2
- 1870±82
- Nguyen, Duy Duc
- 8 −5 8 8
- Hughes, Oliver
- Rating Change
1130±44 − 2 = 1128±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1205±40
- Jin, Ming
- −11 8 10 −6 7
- −12
- 1133±45
- Tan, Ling
- 4 −9 5 5
- −6
- 1186±52
- Rednam, Rajesh
- −3 −4 9 8 9
- Hyland, Bernie
- Rating Change
1067±44 + 21 = 1088±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1181±34
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- −8 6 −8 8 7
- −15
- 1035±40
- Vanicky, Jerry
- 4 8 6
- +15
- 1135±38
- Swanbury, James
- 9 7 −11 3
- Jin, Ming
- Rating Change
1194±41 − 4 = 1190±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1153±43
- Waugh, Lionel
- 7 3 −7 8
- −16
- 1113±40
- Hughes, Oliver
- −11 8 10 −6 7
- +4
- 1079±54
- An, Hong
- 8 13 6
- Joshi, Ankit
- Rating Change
1659±44 − 31 = 1628±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 1598±37
- Tomas, Dragan
- 5 4 −3 −6 8
- −9
- 1649±37
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- −13 9 7 −6 8
- −7
- 1662±32
- Malyschko, Kevin
- 11 7 5
- Kalaba, Michael
- Rating Change
1485±40 + 43 = 1528±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1586±40
- Sharma, Manoj
- 8 9 −9 7
- +13
- 1538±37
- Du, Phat Tang
- 10 4 −9 6
- +12
- 1538±31
- Truong, Jayden
- −8 3 −8 9 4
- Kappellos, Harry
- Rating Change
1457±48 + 27 = 1484±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1624±49
- Weaver, Richard
- 11 9 −8 −9 9
- 0
- 1789±63
- Millwood, Craig
- 8 7 6
- Khuu, Andrew
- Rating Change
1227±53 + 4 = 1231±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1007±40
- Kirsten, Ernie
- 14 5 7
- +2
- 995±42
- Parenti, Stefan
- 2 8 2
- 0
- 861±43
- Bonner, Beverley
- 7 10 8
- Kirsten, Ernie
- Rating Change
1022±42 − 18 = 1004±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1022±60
- Bohdan, Victor
- −5 5 11 −10 9
- −6
- 1086±56
- Phung, Chris
- 5 −7 −9 10 8
- −1
- 1229±52
- Khuu, Andrew
- 14 5 7
- Kracht, Jurgen
- Rating Change
1310±34 + 0 = 1310±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1359±42
- Agocs, Eszter
- 6 9 6
- −7
- 1326±32
- Coombes, Julie
- 9 10 −9 −5 9
- −3
- 1408±36
- Howarth, Scott
- 8 −9 −6 7 7
- Langley, Claire
- Rating Change
1384±34 − 15 = 1369±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1404±49
- Yuan, Elvis
- 8 8 7
- −6
- 1415±36
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- 7 10 6
- −3
- 1484±35
- Malyschko, Peter
- 6 7 4
- Langley, Cynthia
- Rating Change
1245±32 + 4 = 1249±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1126±44
- Bu, Bruce
- 8 −12 6 3
- +1
- 1066±44
- Chandrasena, Samadhi
- 13 −10 9 9
- 0
- 1008±49
- Wang, Ryan
- −6 9 −6 9 9
- Langley, Paul
- Rating Change
2139±69 − 23 = 2116±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1925±42
- Liang, Keyman
- 4 5 −9 8
- −27
- 2122±65
- Houston, Scott A
- 9 −6 −8 6 11
- 0
- 1700±35
- Rogers, Mitchell
- 6 3 5
- Lau, Ivan
- Rating Change
838±43 − 12 = 826±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 672±107
- Rabuan, Muadz
- 4 7 9
- −16
- 765±37
- Campbell, Brooke
- −6 3 9 3
- +1
- 631±53
- Martin, Caroline
- 10 3 −8 5
- Le, Su
- Rating Change
1365±40 + 14 = 1379±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1415±40
- Von Einem, Tim
- −8 9 8 7
- −5
- 1456±38
- Coxon, Andy
- 9 −8 −8 8 6
- +5
- 1308±37
- Lowe, David
- 7 −10 4 3
- Le, Triet
- Rating Change
1369±75 + 30 = 1399±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1278±53
- Hatsitsopanidis, Harry
- 7 9 7
- +11
- 1255±51
- Pankiewicz, Paul
- −9 −9 5 4 3
- +3
- 1167±35
- Deutrom, Paul
- 8 3 6
- Le, Tuan Quang
- Rating Change
993±45 − 22 = 971±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 975±40
- Wu, Bryant
- 5 5 7
- −8
- 1018±76
- Marlu, Greg
- 4 6 −9 7
- 0
- 1405±118
- Akhurst, Matthew
- −7 8 3 4
- Lewis, Bill
- Rating Change
1519±35 − 9 = 1510±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1537±37
- Du, Phat Tang
- 8 −9 7 4
- −9
- 1513±38
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- 6 9 −13 9
- +1
- 1347±33
- Smiech, Alex
- 8 6 6
- −7
- 1523±31
- Truong, Jayden
- 8 9 −6 11
- +1
- 1277±42
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- 6 9 3
- −5
- 1565±35
- Sharma, Manoj
- 8 −9 8 −7 9
- Li, Glen
- Rating Change
863±57 + 20 = 883±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 858±107
- Beames, Max
- 7 10
- +5
- 698±115
- Milograd, Marc
- 0 4
- +1
- 553±64
- Turrell, Luke
- 7 6
- Liang, David
- Rating Change
1620±48 − 26 = 1594±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1433±34
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 4 11 8
- −18
- 1543±33
- Neubauer, Ken
- 9 −5 6 9
- −9
- 1605±31
- Bates, Stephen
- −6 −7 7 12 8
- Liang, Heng Qian
- Rating Change
1444±38 − 21 = 1423±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1414±36
- Harrison, Keegan
- −9 −7 6 9 9
- −7
- 1471±37
- Zhao, Mark
- 4 5 4
- −3
- 1541±35
- Lu, Jason
- 10 7 −9 10
- Liang, Keyman
- Rating Change
1943±45 − 20 = 1923±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −19
- 1860±47
- Tunbridge, Marc
- −3 −4 5 6 9
- −2
- 2112±58
- Langley, Paul
- 4 5 −9 8
- Lowe, David
- Rating Change
1320±39 − 18 = 1302±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1348±40
- Nottle, Melissa
- 10 6 6
- −6
- 1373±37
- Le, Su
- 7 −10 4 3
- −4
- 1399±33
- Ferro, Tony
- 12 −6 10 5
- Lu, Jason
- Rating Change
1543±38 + 2 = 1545±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1574±37
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- 6 7 9
- −12
- 1500±36
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- 6 9 −4 −7 6
- +3
- 1427±36
- Liang, Heng Qian
- 10 7 −9 10
- Luksch, Eric
- Rating Change
813±51 − 12 = 801±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 677±107
- Rabuan, Muadz
- 10 7 4
- −20
- 767±37
- Campbell, Brooke
- −9 11 7 6
- +3
- 632±53
- Martin, Caroline
- −8 7 8 7
- Luong, Liem
- Rating Change
1750±42 + 17 = 1767±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1737±47
- Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
- −10 7 8 7
- +6
- 1690±43
- Hua, Jordan
- 10 −9 9 8
- +1
- 1509±36
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- −9 10 −4 9 7
- Luong, Ninh
- Rating Change
1010±47 + 3 = 1013±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 811±47
- Grounds, William
- 7 8 9
- +2
- 798±48
- Foundas, George
- 2 4 6
- Maddigan, Damien
- Rating Change
1348±38 − 9 = 1339±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1386±31
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- 6 9 10
- −2
- 1506±39
- Herman, Alan
- 4 5 −9 −3 9
- −1
- 1597±41
- Wang, Wilsen
- 5 9 7
- Malyschko, Kevin
- Rating Change
1657±33 + 12 = 1669±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1635±35
- Joshi, Ankit
- 11 7 5
- +5
- 1617±33
- Bates, Stephen
- 6 8 −10 8
- +1
- 1432±33
- Verrusio, Adrian
- −8 5 5 7
- Malyschko, Peter
- Rating Change
1494±39 − 7 = 1487±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1372±33
- Langley, Claire
- 6 7 4
- −10
- 1488±32
- McDougall, Gary
- −9 5 −3 8 5
- Marlu, Greg
- Rating Change
1033±91 + 11 = 1044±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 979±42
- Le, Tuan Quang
- 4 6 −9 7
- −27
- 1109±44
- Hoang, Hung
- −9 5 7 −10 6
- +7
- 850±49
- Nguyen, Hung
- −6 3 7 5
- Martin, Caroline
- Rating Change
639±55 − 11 = 628±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 801±46
- Luksch, Eric
- −8 7 8 7
- −3
- 812±38
- Taneja, Pranjay
- 7 4 −7 4
- −3
- 827±37
- Lau, Ivan
- 10 3 −8 5
- McArdle, John W
- Rating Change
1354±46 − 32 = 1322±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −19
- 1278±36
- Du, Sally
- 7 −7 −3 9 14
- −8
- 1384±41
- To, Tuan Minh
- 7 7 9
- −6
- 1405±48
- Nguyen, Sinh
- 9 5 −7 6
- McCauley, Peter
- Rating Change
1246±45 + 18 = 1264±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1189±36
- Hartnett, Dennis
- 5 6 4
- +6
- 1171±37
- Deutrom, Paul
- −10 7 6 −11 2
- +4
- 1145±37
- Errington, Glenn A
- 7 8 8
- McDonald, Dale
- Rating Change
1541±37 − 31 = 1510±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 1379±30
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- −5 −8 5 3 9
- −10
- 1495±39
- Herman, Alan
- 10 6 1
- −4
- 1591±40
- Wang, Wilsen
- 5 4 5
- McDougall, Gary
- Rating Change
1479±33 + 17 = 1496±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1498±39
- Malyschko, Peter
- −9 5 −3 8 5
- +4
- 1428±37
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- 6 −14 5 12
- +4
- 1428±49
- Yuan, Elvis
- 6 −9 5 7
- McGregor, Ian
- Rating Change
1197±51 − 10 = 1187±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1330±32
- Coombes, Julie
- 12 3 8
- −4
- 1341±42
- Agocs, Eszter
- 9 2 −7 7
- −2
- 1411±35
- Howarth, Scott
- 0 −9 8 6
- Miller, Shane
- Rating Change
1221±90 − 59 = 1162±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +40
- 1189±36
- Hartnett, Dennis
- −8 4 7 7
- −65
- 1130±37
- Errington, Glenn A
- 5 7 9
- −34
- 1157±35
- Deutrom, Paul
- 8 8 6
- Mills, Paul
- Rating Change
1245±40 − 12 = 1233±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1000±51
- Xu, Peggie
- −8 5 6 −13 7
- −10
- 1251±37
- Siu, Leon
- 9 −8 7 11
- −2
- 1392±55
- Cher, Ryan
- 9 −7 −4 8 8
- Mills, Toby
- Rating Change
1013±42 + 9 = 1022±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 938±44
- Du, Nghia
- 5 −9 9 2
- +3
- 872±41
- Nguyen, Bao
- 4 7 11
- 0
- 739±41
- Diem, My
- 2 3 7
- Millwood, Craig
- Rating Change
1777±66 + 11 = 1788±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1620±54
- Park, Henry
- 6 8 9
- +2
- 1526±35
- Townsend, Marc
- 10 8 7
- +1
- 1483±46
- Kappellos, Harry
- 8 7 6
- Milograd, Marc
- Rating Change
800±150 − 125 = 675±108 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −100
- 777±50
- Boxall, Joshua
- 5 9
- −22
- 873±56
- Li, Glen
- 0 4
- −3
- 1054±95
- Gerges, Youssef
- 2 4
- Milsom, Lucas
- Rating Change
1478±64 + 18 = 1496±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1394±31
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- −7 7 7 9
- +5
- 1320±37
- Bungey, Greg
- 8 6 8
- +1
- 1224±44
- Stevels, Mathijs
- 4 −12 8 −7 3
- Mitchell, Phil
- Rating Change
1288±47 + 3 = 1291±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1288±43
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- −9 −5 7 9 9
- −10
- 1341±32
- Smiech, Alex
- 12 −6 −10 10 7
- −1
- 1522±37
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- 6 8 −4 4
- Mitev, Thomas
- Rating Change
1076±35 + 20 = 1096±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1125±51
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- 4 −7 9 6
- +7
- 1070±49
- Tun, Jason
- 8 5 −6 4
- +3
- 958±51
- Thomson, Anthony
- 14 8 2
- Morrison, James
- Rating Change
432±81 − 5 = 427±80 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 672±40
- Du, Daniel
- 11 10
- 0
- 879±51
- Pham, Tony
- 3 6
- 0
- 902±55
- Tran, Duy
- 5 4
- Morrison, Kym
- Rating Change
970±46 + 17 = 987±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 935±44
- Shaughnessy, Kelly
- −17 9 6 −4 10
- +4
- 858±42
- Roder, Lenore
- 7 4 10
- +3
- 826±47
- Davies, Owen
- 5 −12 7 −9 6
- Muhammad, Nayil
- Rating Change
895±47 − 5 = 890±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 1077±45
- Vernik, Kamilo
- 9 6 7
- −2
- 1082±38
- Sefin, Ahmed
- 7 8 6
- Neubauer, Ken
- Rating Change
1534±34 + 19 = 1553±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1607±38
- Liang, David
- 9 −5 6 9
- +5
- 1480±34
- Abbas, Alice
- 8 5 9
- +4
- 1467±33
- Tan, Kok Chong
- 9 9 10
- Nguyen, Bao
- Rating Change
856±42 + 12 = 868±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 894±55
- Burrows, Hayden
- 9 9 −6 9
- −3
- 1019±41
- Mills, Toby
- 4 7 11
- +2
- 693±39
- Thomas, Cam
- 4 5 8
- Nguyen, Cindy
- Rating Change
769±55 − 28 = 741±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 783±50
- Foundas, George
- 3 −9 6 10
- −12
- 797±48
- Grounds, William
- 11 3 10
- Nguyen, Duy Duc
- Rating Change
1853±83 + 22 = 1875±81 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1730±45
- Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
- −6 −6 12 8 10
- +7
- 1685±42
- Hua, Jordan
- 8 −5 8 8
- +1
- 1509±36
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- 9 −9 3 10
- Nguyen, Hung
- Rating Change
856±52 − 9 = 847±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 982±39
- Wu, Bryant
- −10 −9 5 9 8
- −3
- 1039±71
- Marlu, Greg
- −6 3 7 5
- 0
- 1406±118
- Akhurst, Matthew
- 9 1 7
- Nguyen, Khiem
- Rating Change
552±50 − 15 = 537±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 631±61
- Bates, Edward
- 7 9
- −5
- 672±61
- Dissanayake, Savin
- 5 7
- −2
- 743±71
- Brice, Mika
- 3 4
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- Rating Change
1641±38 + 17 = 1658±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1636±35
- Joshi, Ankit
- −13 9 7 −6 8
- +7
- 1618±33
- Bates, Stephen
- −4 −9 5 8 5
- +1
- 1432±33
- Verrusio, Adrian
- −6 1 6 1
- Nguyen, Ricky
- Rating Change
1429±35 − 13 = 1416±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1235±42
- Andreoni, Eric
- 10 −12 8 6
- −14
- 1280±45
- Cook, Stephen Steve
- −3 −5 11 8 13
- 0
- 1112±43
- Roberts, Tony
- −8 16 11 11
- Nguyen, Sinh
- Rating Change
1402±48 + 13 = 1415±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1330±40
- McArdle, John W
- 9 5 −7 6
- +4
- 1277±45
- Taylor, Lucjan
- 6 −8 9 5
- Nguyen, Thoi
- Rating Change
1105±54 + 10 = 1115±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1125±44
- Roberts, Tony
- 10 2 −8 −12 7
- −6
- 1230±41
- Andreoni, Eric
- 3 7 9
- −2
- 1302±45
- Cook, Stephen Steve
- 5 −6 7 −5 7
- Northeast, Tania
- Rating Change
1095±39 + 17 = 1112±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1185±38
- Tyas, Robbie
- −4 6 12 9
- −5
- 1171±53
- Giang, Kha
- 5 9 6
- +8
- 1089±51
- Hock, Steve
- 11 9 6
- Nottle, Melissa
- Rating Change
1362±43 − 6 = 1356±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1308±37
- Lowe, David
- 10 6 6
- −10
- 1395±37
- Von Einem, Tim
- −10 9 4 −6 5
- −5
- 1456±38
- Coxon, Andy
- −3 9 7 −9 10
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- Rating Change
1521±41 + 1 = 1522±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1518±32
- Lewis, Bill
- 6 9 −13 9
- −10
- 1532±32
- Stevels, Lenno
- 6 8 −7 9
- +1
- 1291±43
- Mitchell, Phil
- 6 8 −4 4
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- Rating Change
1146±62 − 36 = 1110±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1096±54
- Tan, Yong Han
- −8 8 −11 10 7
- −29
- 1075±53
- Cher, Albert
- 8 7 −6 5
- −20
- 1088±38
- Mitev, Thomas
- 4 −7 9 6
- Pankiewicz, Paul
- Rating Change
1255±51 − 6 = 1249±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 797±94
- Cao, Kenny
- 6 6 6
- −6
- 1389±73
- Le, Triet
- −9 −9 5 4 3
- 0
- 795±93
- Duong, Bill
- 5 3 5
- Parenti, Stefan
- Rating Change
986±45 + 11 = 997±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1092±81
- Bohdan, Victor
- −3 9 9 −8 8
- −6
- 1090±56
- Phung, Chris
- 8 8 −7 10
- −1
- 1230±52
- Khuu, Andrew
- 2 8 2
- Park, Henry
- Rating Change
1648±59 − 33 = 1615±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −28
- 1590±36
- Weaver, Richard
- 6 −9 9 11
- −5
- 1781±65
- Millwood, Craig
- 6 8 9
- Pearce, Bob
- Rating Change
925±90 − 37 = 888±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 786±38
- Hampel, Bailey
- −9 2 7 −3 6
- −69
- 790±37
- Woodcock, Thomas
- −7 7 10 9
- +13
- 781±46
- Zhang, Peter
- 11 7 7
- Pham, Tony
- Rating Change
875±52 + 3 = 878±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 696±40
- Farley, Shannon
- 8 6
- 0
- 497±58
- Farley, Jade
- 9 9
- 0
- 426±80
- Morrison, James
- 3 6
- Phung, Chris
- Rating Change
1074±57 + 25 = 1099±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1012±41
- Kirsten, Ernie
- 5 −7 −9 10 8
- +10
- 1001±44
- Parenti, Stefan
- 8 8 −7 10
- +2
- 862±44
- Bonner, Beverley
- 4 7 8
- Pikula, Sandro
- Rating Change
1693±39 − 15 = 1678±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1657±40
- Zhang, Michael
- 9 6 −6 13
- −3
- 1808±49
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- 7 −7 −8 6 4
- Rabuan, Muadz
- Rating Change
800±150 − 149 = 651±100 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −94
- 796±46
- Luksch, Eric
- 10 7 4
- −37
- 809±38
- Taneja, Pranjay
- 6 8 7
- −19
- 823±37
- Lau, Ivan
- 4 7 9
- Rednam, Rajesh
- Rating Change
1215±70 − 20 = 1195±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1135±40
- Hughes, Oliver
- −3 −4 9 8 9
- −38
- 1132±36
- Waugh, Lionel
- 10 6 9
- +6
- 1078±53
- An, Hong
- 15 −5 11 8
- Roberts, Tony
- Rating Change
1130±46 − 19 = 1111±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 1095±51
- Nguyen, Thoi
- 10 2 −8 −12 7
- −3
- 1264±39
- Bui, Nghia
- 9 3 −9 9
- 0
- 1417±33
- Nguyen, Ricky
- −8 16 11 11
- Rochow, Ian
- Rating Change
1518±34 − 4 = 1514±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1537±31
- Truong, Jayden
- 11 −11 −11 8 5
- −8
- 1518±36
- Du, Phat Tang
- −4 8 4 −8 8
- −5
- 1565±35
- Sharma, Manoj
- −5 7 8 8
- Roder, Lenore
- Rating Change
871±46 − 16 = 855±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 931±46
- Ford, Susan
- 8 −9 8 12
- −4
- 983±45
- Morrison, Kym
- 7 4 10
- −4
- 986±38
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 6 6 8
- Rogers, Mitchell
- Rating Change
1702±35 − 2 = 1700±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 1879±51
- Tunbridge, Marc
- −10 4 −7 6 8
- 0
- 2116±57
- Langley, Paul
- 6 3 5
- Ruanglertboon, Warit Will
- Rating Change
1600±200 + 71 = 1671±160 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +56
- 1392±31
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- 4 7 9
- +12
- 1319±36
- Bungey, Greg
- 6 −9 −7 10 8
- +3
- 1223±44
- Stevels, Mathijs
- 10 −8 7 −9 9
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- Rating Change
1509±36 + 0 = 1509±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −1
- 1767±45
- Luong, Liem
- −9 10 −4 9 7
- 0
- 1877±81
- Nguyen, Duy Duc
- 9 −9 3 10
- Sefin, Ahmed
- Rating Change
1072±38 + 12 = 1084±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1126±48
- Espartero, Joel
- −8 8 −8 7 7
- −2
- 1279±62
- Al-Boasi, Zee
- 6 6 9
- +1
- 892±46
- Muhammad, Nayil
- 7 8 6
- Sharma, Manoj
- Rating Change
1574±39 − 2 = 1572±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1520±32
- Rochow, Ian
- −5 7 8 8
- −13
- 1512±40
- Kalaba, Michael
- 8 9 −9 7
- +6
- 1516±32
- Lewis, Bill
- 8 −9 8 −7 9
- Shaughnessy, Graeme
- Rating Change
1137±45 + 25 = 1162±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1276±38
- Siu, Leon
- −7 8 6 −5 8
- −1
- 1396±55
- Cher, Ryan
- 9 7 8
- +3
- 1004±51
- Xu, Peggie
- 3 3 7
- Shaughnessy, Kelly
- Rating Change
932±48 − 4 = 928±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 955±47
- Ford, Susan
- 12 9 9
- −10
- 980±45
- Morrison, Kym
- −17 9 6 −4 10
- −9
- 983±37
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 7 −11 −8 8 6
- Siu, Leon
- Rating Change
1287±41 − 28 = 1259±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1243±39
- Mills, Paul
- 9 −8 7 11
- −19
- 1140±44
- Shaughnessy, Graeme
- −7 8 6 −5 8
- −16
- 1154±35
- Dashko, Alex
- −4 −8 8 10 9
- Smiech, Alex
- Rating Change
1328±32 + 18 = 1346±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1553±32
- Stevels, Lenno
- −6 8 15 9
- −1
- 1510±32
- Lewis, Bill
- 8 6 6
- +5
- 1300±45
- Mitchell, Phil
- 12 −6 −10 10 7
- Stevels, Lenno
- Rating Change
1548±33 − 9 = 1539±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1532±40
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- 6 8 −7 9
- −15
- 1332±31
- Smiech, Alex
- −6 8 15 9
- 0
- 1277±42
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- −8 9 5 3
- −1
- 1777±48
- Golobokov, Pavel
- 2 6 7
- 0
- 1874±46
- Akonor, Solomen
- 4 7 −10 −9 7
- Stevels, Mathijs
- Rating Change
1216±45 + 9 = 1225±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1186±42
- Takos, Harry
- −9 5 7 7
- −1
- 1494±64
- Milsom, Lucas
- 4 −12 8 −7 3
- 0
- 1668±162
- Ruanglertboon, Warit Will
- 10 −8 7 −9 9
- Swanbury, James
- Rating Change
1155±42 − 34 = 1121±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 1072±41
- Hyland, Bernie
- 9 7 −11 3
- −10
- 1136±38
- Ciantar, Robert
- 9 5 −10 7
- −7
- 1164±37
- Teagle, Ken
- −8 9 7 3
- Takos, Harry
- Rating Change
1165±42 + 12 = 1177±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1335±37
- Bungey, Greg
- 9 −9 8 7
- −8
- 1214±44
- Stevels, Mathijs
- −9 5 7 7
- −1
- 1390±31
- Chandrasena, Sidath
- 8 2 5
- Tan, Kok Chong
- Rating Change
1480±35 − 17 = 1463±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1420±35
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 2 5 9
- −4
- 1550±35
- Neubauer, Ken
- 9 9 10
- −2
- 1610±31
- Bates, Stephen
- 10 4 −5 3
- Tan, Ling
- Rating Change
1139±51 + 7 = 1146±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1139±41
- Hughes, Oliver
- 4 −9 5 5
- −16
- 1136±37
- Waugh, Lionel
- 9 8 7
- +8
- 1084±54
- An, Hong
- 8 8 12
- Tan, Yong Han
- Rating Change
1069±51 + 6 = 1075±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1070±48
- Tun, Jason
- −7 9 −10 8 9
- −14
- 1092±48
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- −8 8 −11 10 7
- +5
- 959±51
- Thomson, Anthony
- 6 6 6
- Taneja, Pranjay
- Rating Change
799±39 + 14 = 813±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 787±39
- Campbell, Brooke
- 5 10 −4 −7 7
- +3
- 681±108
- Rabuan, Muadz
- 6 8 7
- +2
- 632±53
- Martin, Caroline
- 7 4 −7 4
- Taylor, Lucjan
- Rating Change
1243±41 + 31 = 1274±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1415±45
- To, Tuan Minh
- 6 −9 3 8
- −2
- 1412±47
- Nguyen, Sinh
- 6 −8 9 5
- +13
- 1305±42
- Du, Sally
- 7 −8 8 −6 7
- Teagle, Ken
- Rating Change
1192±40 − 23 = 1169±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1127±38
- Swanbury, James
- −8 9 7 3
- −19
- 1028±39
- Vanicky, Jerry
- 9 7 8
- −10
- 1160±33
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- 6 5 7
- Thomas, Cam
- Rating Change
701±41 − 10 = 691±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 729±42
- Diem, My
- 10 −10 4 3
- −2
- 866±40
- Nguyen, Bao
- 4 5 8
- 0
- 1267±38
- Bui, Nghia
- 5 6 9
- Thomas, Max
- Rating Change
872±40 − 1 = 871±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 885±43
- Bellido, Jose
- 7 4 8
- −14
- 806±40
- Yunos, Naguib
- 1 8 9
- +2
- 729±38
- Adams, Mike
- 2 −6 8 11
- Thomson, Anthony
- Rating Change
978±56 − 21 = 957±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1078±47
- Tan, Yong Han
- 6 6 6
- −7
- 1092±56
- Cher, Albert
- 9 6 5
- −5
- 1097±43
- Mitev, Thomas
- 14 8 2
- To, Tuan Minh
- Rating Change
1406±45 − 15 = 1391±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1329±40
- McArdle, John W
- 7 7 9
- −23
- 1254±39
- Taylor, Lucjan
- 6 −9 3 8
- Tomas, Dragan
- Rating Change
1607±40 + 2 = 1609±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1638±35
- Joshi, Ankit
- 5 4 −3 −6 8
- −10
- 1605±31
- Bates, Stephen
- 9 8 7
- +2
- 1433±34
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 7 8 9
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- Rating Change
1290±44 − 15 = 1275±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1277±44
- Mitchell, Phil
- −9 −5 7 9 9
- −1
- 1510±32
- Lewis, Bill
- 6 9 3
- −1
- 1538±31
- Stevels, Lenno
- −8 9 5 3
- Townsend, Marc
- Rating Change
1532±37 − 6 = 1526±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1596±37
- Weaver, Richard
- 4 2 7
- −1
- 1788±63
- Millwood, Craig
- 10 8 7
- Tran, Duy
- Rating Change
898±56 + 3 = 901±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 695±40
- Farley, Shannon
- 7 3
- 0
- 497±58
- Farley, Jade
- 3 4
- 0
- 426±80
- Morrison, James
- 5 4
- Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
- Rating Change
1744±49 − 18 = 1726±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 1757±43
- Luong, Liem
- −10 7 8 7
- −5
- 1863±82
- Nguyen, Duy Duc
- −6 −6 12 8 10
- Truong, Jayden
- Rating Change
1540±34 − 10 = 1530±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1517±32
- Lewis, Bill
- 8 9 −6 11
- −9
- 1507±32
- Rochow, Ian
- 11 −11 −11 8 5
- −8
- 1515±41
- Kalaba, Michael
- −8 3 −8 9 4
- Tun, Jason
- Rating Change
1115±57 − 56 = 1059±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −25
- 1067±46
- Tan, Yong Han
- −7 9 −10 8 9
- −17
- 1078±54
- Cher, Albert
- 4 6 10
- −13
- 1090±39
- Mitev, Thomas
- 8 5 −6 4
- Tunbridge, Marc
- Rating Change
1858±49 + 24 = 1882±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1941±44
- Liang, Keyman
- −3 −4 5 6 9
- −1
- 2145±65
- Houston, Scott A
- −9 4 4 8
- +3
- 1702±35
- Rogers, Mitchell
- −10 4 −7 6 8
- Turrell, Luke
- Rating Change
557±67 − 5 = 552±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 786±50
- Boxall, Joshua
- 6 9
- −1
- 881±57
- Li, Glen
- 7 6
- 0
- 1062±94
- Gerges, Youssef
- 6 4
- Tyas, Robbie
- Rating Change
1190±39 − 19 = 1171±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 1099±37
- Northeast, Tania
- −4 6 12 9
- −4
- 1273±41
- Hagel, Scott
- 7 4 8
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- Rating Change
1806±50 + 8 = 1814±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1682±38
- Pikula, Sandro
- 7 −7 −8 6 4
- +2
- 1603±39
- Weaver, Richard
- 6 8 4
- 0
- 1383±66
- Faulkner, Bradley
- −8 7 7 1
- Vanicky, Jerry
- Rating Change
1019±42 + 33 = 1052±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1189±37
- Teagle, Ken
- 9 7 8
- −4
- 1143±38
- Ciantar, Robert
- 9 7 6
- +15
- 1106±44
- Hyland, Bernie
- 4 8 6
- Vernik, Kamilo
- Rating Change
1092±48 − 14 = 1078±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 892±46
- Muhammad, Nayil
- 9 6 7
- −14
- 1096±43
- Espartero, Joel
- 8 5 9
- −2
- 1277±62
- Al-Boasi, Zee
- 5 6 7
- Verrusio, Adrian
- Rating Change
1431±37 + 0 = 1431±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1472±33
- Tan, Kok Chong
- 2 5 9
- −7
- 1470±33
- Abbas, Alice
- 1 −10 −8 3 6
- −2
- 1592±35
- Liang, David
- 4 11 8
- −1
- 1609±37
- Tomas, Dragan
- 7 8 9
- −1
- 1657±36
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- −6 1 6 1
- −1
- 1668±32
- Malyschko, Kevin
- −8 5 5 7
- Vishwachandra, Mihiri
- Rating Change
752±36 + 13 = 765±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 817±39
- Woodcock, Thomas
- −9 6 7 −8 6
- −8
- 764±46
- Zhang, Peter
- 7 8 −9 −6 5
- +10
- 796±39
- Hampel, Bailey
- −8 10 7 −9 7
- Von Einem, Tim
- Rating Change
1397±41 + 6 = 1403±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1411±35
- Ferro, Tony
- 7 8 7
- −13
- 1368±37
- Le, Su
- −8 9 8 7
- +7
- 1365±40
- Nottle, Melissa
- −10 9 4 −6 5
- Walker, Trevor
- Rating Change
1797±36 − 14 = 1783±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1762±45
- Golobokov, Pavel
- −8 10 6 4
- −4
- 1867±47
- Akonor, Solomen
- −5 8 −8 3 9
- Walsh, Dennis
- Rating Change
1283±36 + 3 = 1286±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1124±43
- Bu, Bruce
- 8 3 −12 −3 11
- +1
- 1066±43
- Chandrasena, Samadhi
- −11 7 8 −9 8
- 0
- 1007±49
- Wang, Ryan
- 9 2 9
- Wang, Ryan
- Rating Change
1011±50 − 5 = 1006±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 1218±35
- Davies, Philip
- 7 4 5
- −1
- 1248±32
- Langley, Cynthia
- −6 9 −6 9 9
- −1
- 1286±36
- Walsh, Dennis
- 9 2 9
- Wang, Wilsen
- Rating Change
1586±40 + 11 = 1597±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1515±34
- McDonald, Dale
- 5 4 5
- +5
- 1500±40
- Grant, Paul
- 5 3 6
- +1
- 1339±36
- Maddigan, Damien
- 5 9 7
- Wang, Yanan
- Rating Change
659±52 − 16 = 643±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 771±45
- Zhang, Peter
- 9 7 11
- −5
- 779±39
- Hampel, Bailey
- 10 2 6
- −4
- 801±37
- Woodcock, Thomas
- 5 −7 −8 4 3
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- Rating Change
1486±37 + 26 = 1512±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1558±37
- Lu, Jason
- 6 9 −4 −7 6
- +8
- 1488±37
- Zhao, Mark
- 6 7 9
- +4
- 1430±36
- Harrison, Keegan
- 10 9 7
- Waugh, Lionel
- Rating Change
1129±39 + 17 = 1146±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1239±72
- Rednam, Rajesh
- 10 6 9
- −7
- 1184±38
- Jin, Ming
- 7 3 −7 8
- +10
- 1163±50
- Tan, Ling
- 9 8 7
- Weaver, Richard
- Rating Change
1589±40 + 13 = 1602±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1686±40
- Zhang, Michael
- −10 8 10 7
- −16
- 1457±47
- Kappellos, Harry
- 11 9 −8 −9 9
- +11
- 1640±56
- Park, Henry
- 6 −9 9 11
- −1
- 1813±49
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- 6 8 4
- +5
- 1531±36
- Townsend, Marc
- 4 2 7
- Woodcock, Thomas
- Rating Change
800±39 + 5 = 805±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 950±84
- Pearce, Bob
- −7 7 10 9
- −13
- 754±34
- Vishwachandra, Mihiri
- −9 6 7 −8 6
- +2
- 647±50
- Wang, Yanan
- 5 −7 −8 4 3
- Wu, Bryant
- Rating Change
974±42 + 11 = 985±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 985±43
- Le, Tuan Quang
- 5 5 7
- −3
- 1111±44
- Hoang, Hung
- −10 7 −6 6 8
- +3
- 852±50
- Nguyen, Hung
- −10 −9 5 9 8
- Xu, Peggie
- Rating Change
1011±53 − 11 = 1000±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1159±44
- Shaughnessy, Graeme
- 3 3 7
- −4
- 1167±37
- Dashko, Alex
- 12 10 5
- −2
- 1235±38
- Mills, Paul
- −8 5 6 −13 7
- Yuan, Elvis
- Rating Change
1414±51 + 3 = 1417±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1375±33
- Langley, Claire
- 8 8 7
- −9
- 1491±32
- McDougall, Gary
- 6 −9 5 7
- Yunos, Naguib
- Rating Change
814±43 + 8 = 822±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 884±39
- Thomas, Max
- 1 8 9
- −6
- 908±41
- Burrows, Alana
- −11 2 7 4
- −2
- 987±38
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 3 7 9
- Zhang, Michael
- Rating Change
1673±41 − 4 = 1669±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1689±38
- Pikula, Sandro
- 9 6 −6 13
- −17
- 1588±35
- Weaver, Richard
- −10 8 10 7
- +1
- 1384±67
- Faulkner, Bradley
- 6 7 −9 7
- Zhang, Peter
- Rating Change
762±49 + 14 = 776±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 773±37
- Vishwachandra, Mihiri
- 7 8 −9 −6 5
- −6
- 878±68
- Pearce, Bob
- 11 7 7
- +5
- 650±50
- Wang, Yanan
- 9 7 11
- Zhao, Mark
- Rating Change
1486±40 − 8 = 1478±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1430±36
- Liang, Heng Qian
- 4 5 4
- −9
- 1503±36
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- 6 7 9
- −5
- 1558±36
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- −10 −6 9 8 5
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 204. Matches: 303. Club: Table Tennis South Australia. Province: SA. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bungey, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 26196. Submitted/revised: 2022-07-13 7:54 pm EDT. Last processed: 2024-04-28 11:40 pm EDT.