2018 CDTTA Pennant 1705
2018-05-17
Detailed Report
- Addicott, Rhonda
- Rating Change
748±42 + 9 = 757±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 707±35
- Bryan, Bob
- 9 20
- 0
- 425±46
- Hopstaken, Margaret
- 8 6
- Bateman, Colin
- Rating Change
726±40 − 6 = 720±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 830±36
- Britton, Joe
- 15 9
- −1
- 1000±150
- Deichen, Harry
- 16 16
- Beach, Steve
- Rating Change
1005±37 + 1 = 1006±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 803±68
- Mazzaferri, Michael
- 2 7 7 10
- 0
- 573±88
- Mazzaferri, Henry
- 4 4 4 3
- Beatty, Roslyn
- Rating Change
756±48 − 4 = 752±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 646±45
- Searle, Pat
- 6 13
- −9
- 819±36
- Swatek, Glen
- 19 14
- Bialecki, Andrew
- Rating Change
976±82 − 21 = 955±76 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −18
- 1080±45
- Sivakumar, Vig
- 6 5 5 8
- −3
- 1221±45
- Bialecki, Jason
- 8 7 6 −10 1
- Bialecki, Jason
- Rating Change
1244±52 − 21 = 1223±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 959±77
- Bialecki, Andrew
- 8 7 6 −10 1
- −23
- 1161±42
- Jung, Tad
- −9 14 8 9 −8 −2 9
- Bower, Tim
- Rating Change
1269±50 + 16 = 1285±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1271±40
- Harris, Lachlan
- 5 −9 1 8 7
- Britton, Joe
- Rating Change
838±37 − 5 = 833±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 724±40
- Bateman, Colin
- 15 9
- −8
- 853±37
- Davies, Malcolm
- 5 13
- Bryan, Bob
- Rating Change
706±36 − 5 = 701±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 528±45
- Foster, Sue
- 10 8
- −6
- 748±42
- Addicott, Rhonda
- 9 20
- Davies, Malcolm
- Rating Change
855±38 + 6 = 861±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 841±37
- Britton, Joe
- 5 13
- −2
- 1026±72
- Francis, Dick
- 9 7
- Deichen, Harry
- Rating Change
1000±150 + 18 = 1018±139 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 722±38
- Bateman, Colin
- 16 16
- Dommers, Neil
- Rating Change
916±36 − 6 = 910±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1008±40
- Markov, Louis
- 14 10
- −2
- 1069±34
- Rial, Peter
- 11 13
- Dyer, Terry
- Rating Change
1189±42 + 20 = 1209±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1251±45
- Kung, Bernard
- 6 4 −4 4 9
- +4
- 1078±41
- Zambrano, Carlos
- 9 9 7 11
- Falconer, Colin
- Rating Change
657±42 − 3 = 654±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 621±53
- Salgueiro, Christian
- −7 6 9 10 4
- −11
- 662±46
- Van Veen, Peter
- −11 5 8 7 9
- Fly, Graham
- Rating Change
1033±39 + 0 = 1033±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1047±31
- Hird, Bruce
- 20 22
- −10
- 1028±40
- Woodfield, Graham
- 18 18
- Foster, Sue
- Rating Change
521±47 + 4 = 525±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 431±47
- Hopstaken, Margaret
- 12 21
- −3
- 700±35
- Bryan, Bob
- 10 8
- Francis, Dick
- Rating Change
1026±72 + 8 = 1034±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 863±38
- Davies, Malcolm
- 9 7
- Gall, Liz
- Rating Change
649±41 − 8 = 641±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 412±76
- Saberi, Nasim
- 7 5 5 12
- −10
- 667±43
- Symes, Brendon
- 7 3 9 6
- Goodridge, Robert
- Rating Change
1119±41 − 13 = 1106±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1114±41
- Signor, Dominic
- 6 −7 10 3 6
- −3
- 1256±44
- Signor, Sergio
- 7 −8 −6 4 12 10
- Goodwin, Jim
- Rating Change
1012±39 − 6 = 1006±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 919±39
- Kirk, Rick
- 7 6 4 −10 −8 10
- −10
- 997±49
- Kirk, Cameron
- 4 6 8 11
- Gormann, Ben
- Rating Change
1455±34 − 4 = 1451±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1266±41
- Harrison, Leigh
- 13 4 3 −3 11
- −5
- 1504±47
- Tang, Haine
- −4 9 −8 3 6 4
- Harris, Lachlan
- Rating Change
1258±41 + 3 = 1261±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1294±35
- Pilz, Lothar
- 5 −6 −1 9 10 9
- −10
- 1269±50
- Bower, Tim
- 5 −9 1 8 7
- Harrison, Leigh
- Rating Change
1257±42 + 7 = 1264±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1230±51
- Talolin, Nick
- 7 10 9 −7 −7 7
- −2
- 1450±33
- Gormann, Ben
- 13 4 3 −3 11
- Harrison, Peter
- Rating Change
746±35 + 13 = 759±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 847±73
- Mazzaferri, Michael
- 7 6 −4 6 9
- +2
- 584±91
- Mazzaferri, Henry
- 7 6 5 1
- Hird, Bruce
- Rating Change
1048±31 − 8 = 1040±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1024±34
- Fly, Graham
- 20 22
- −1
- 1222±30
- Marsden, Bob
- 6 12
- Hopstaken, Margaret
- Rating Change
432±47 − 8 = 424±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 519±46
- Foster, Sue
- 12 21
- 0
- 756±41
- Addicott, Rhonda
- 8 6
- Hung, Jeff
- Rating Change
921±85 − 24 = 897±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 800±41
- Wilson, Les
- −5 7 −7 5 8 10
- −41
- 908±46
- Oliver, Sue
- 6 −3 4 4 7
- Hyde, David
- Rating Change
900±110 + 10 = 910±107 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 679±42
- Symes, Brendon
- 6 5 5 −13 6
- 0
- 409±75
- Saberi, Nasim
- 10 2 5 3
- Jung, Tad
- Rating Change
1155±43 + 24 = 1179±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1246±51
- Bialecki, Jason
- −9 14 8 9 −8 −2 9
- +6
- 1094±46
- Sivakumar, Vig
- 7 −5 3 9 6
- Keating, John
- Rating Change
1285±32 − 2 = 1283±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1345±41
- Waters, Peter
- 9 7 7 −6 7
- −12
- 1155±47
- Powers, Grant
- 9 8 10 −11 −6 −8 6
- Kirk, Cameron
- Rating Change
986±48 + 29 = 1015±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1017±38
- Goodwin, Jim
- 4 6 8 11
- +11
- 960±41
- Salgueiro, Fernando
- −6 5 6 10 4
- Kirk, Rick
- Rating Change
936±42 − 22 = 914±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 941±41
- Salgueiro, Fernando
- 0 0 0 0
- −6
- 1001±37
- Goodwin, Jim
- 7 6 4 −10 −8 10
- −3
- 1050±31
- Morgan, Shane
- 4 −9 7 4 6
- −2
- 1073±53
- Noble, Brian
- −5 −9 5 8 8 3
- Kung, Bernard
- Rating Change
1251±45 − 16 = 1235±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 1193±42
- Dyer, Terry
- 6 4 −4 4 9
- Markov, Louis
- Rating Change
1014±42 − 1 = 1013±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 914±36
- Dommers, Neil
- 14 10
- −5
- 1107±33
- Roberts, Neil
- 10 −20 9
- Marsden, Bob
- Rating Change
1221±30 + 2 = 1223±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1041±30
- Hird, Bruce
- 6 12
- +1
- 1041±40
- Woodfield, Graham
- 11 8
- Mazzaferri, Henry
- Rating Change
585±91 − 11 = 574±88 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 758±34
- Harrison, Peter
- 7 6 5 1
- 0
- 1007±37
- Beach, Steve
- 4 4 4 3
- Mazzaferri, Michael
- Rating Change
859±78 − 60 = 799±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −55
- 749±34
- Harrison, Peter
- 7 6 −4 6 9
- −5
- 1005±37
- Beach, Steve
- 2 7 7 10
- McFarland, Marilyn
- Rating Change
717±49 − 5 = 712±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 894±35
- Thomas, Margaret
- 17 15
- −2
- 925±45
- Stitzel, Paul
- 6 7
- Menzies, Ruth
- Rating Change
909±51 − 11 = 898±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 796±35
- Szabo, Katalin
- −19 13 16
- −18
- 891±45
- Uglow, Laurie
- 16 12
- Morgan, Shane
- Rating Change
1043±31 + 8 = 1051±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1044±44
- Roberts, Frank
- −6 9 6 −9 10 9
- +2
- 918±38
- Kirk, Rick
- 4 −9 7 4 6
- Noble, Brian
- Rating Change
1059±49 + 16 = 1075±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1042±44
- Roberts, Frank
- 9 6 −8 −9 8 9
- +3
- 917±38
- Kirk, Rick
- −5 −9 5 8 8 3
- Oliver, Sue
- Rating Change
901±46 + 22 = 923±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 939±80
- Hung, Jeff
- 6 −3 4 4 7
- +7
- 832±44
- White, Steve
- −5 13 5 9 9
- Pilz, Lothar
- Rating Change
1294±35 − 10 = 1284±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1249±39
- Harris, Lachlan
- 5 −6 −1 9 10 9
- Powers, Grant
- Rating Change
1155±47 + 26 = 1181±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1294±32
- Keating, John
- 9 8 10 −11 −6 −8 6
- 0
- 1528±93
- Slater, Terry
- 4 5 6 12
- Rial, Peter
- Rating Change
1076±35 − 5 = 1071±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 912±35
- Dommers, Neil
- 11 13
- −7
- 1104±33
- Roberts, Neil
- 10 13
- Roberts, Frank
- Rating Change
1058±47 − 26 = 1032±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 1045±31
- Morgan, Shane
- −6 9 6 −9 10 9
- −11
- 1064±50
- Noble, Brian
- 9 6 −8 −9 8 9
- Roberts, Neil
- Rating Change
1101±33 + 9 = 1110±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1078±35
- Rial, Peter
- 10 13
- +3
- 1019±41
- Markov, Louis
- 10 −20 9
- Roberts, Peter
- Rating Change
1012±45 + 6 = 1018±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 910±45
- Uglow, Laurie
- 13 7
- +1
- 793±35
- Szabo, Katalin
- 14 11
- Saberi, Nasim
- Rating Change
412±76 − 4 = 408±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 640±38
- Gall, Liz
- 7 5 5 12
- 0
- 909±108
- Hyde, David
- 10 2 5 3
- Salgueiro, Christian
- Rating Change
601±48 + 5 = 606±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 640±40
- Wakefield, Paul
- 9 −9 7 12 11
- −11
- 645±40
- Falconer, Colin
- −7 6 9 10 4
- Salgueiro, Fernando
- Rating Change
950±42 + 2 = 952±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 922±39
- Kirk, Rick
- 0 0 0 0
- −8
- 1003±50
- Kirk, Cameron
- −6 5 6 10 4
- Schofield, Joan
- Rating Change
551±43 − 7 = 544±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 634±44
- Searle, Pat
- 12 18
- −1
- 824±36
- Swatek, Glen
- 12 13
- Searle, Pat
- Rating Change
639±46 + 1 = 640±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 550±42
- Schofield, Joan
- 12 18
- −6
- 747±42
- Beatty, Roslyn
- 6 13
- Signor, Dominic
- Rating Change
1114±41 + 10 = 1124±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1116±40
- Goodridge, Robert
- 6 −7 10 3 6
- Signor, Sergio
- Rating Change
1256±44 + 3 = 1259±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1109±39
- Goodridge, Robert
- 7 −8 −6 4 12 10
- Sivakumar, Vig
- Rating Change
1089±47 − 2 = 1087±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 972±80
- Bialecki, Andrew
- 6 5 5 8
- −7
- 1173±45
- Jung, Tad
- 7 −5 3 9 6
- Slater, Terry
- Rating Change
1515±96 + 12 = 1527±93 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1332±40
- Waters, Peter
- 3 11 −7 8 −5 3
- +1
- 1181±46
- Powers, Grant
- 4 5 6 12
- Smythe, David
- Rating Change
1011±35 − 7 = 1004±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1016±45
- Spittles, Paul
- 9 −8 7 4 7
- Soveny, Mark
- Rating Change
1153±64 + 9 = 1162±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1036±51
- Spittles, Paul
- 10 4 8 6
- Spittles, Paul
- Rating Change
1022±49 + 6 = 1028±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1011±35
- Smythe, David
- 9 −8 7 4 7
- −6
- 1153±64
- Soveny, Mark
- 10 4 8 6
- Spitzer, Helga
- Rating Change
681±37 − 2 = 679±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −1
- 894±35
- Thomas, Margaret
- 13 12
- −1
- 926±45
- Stitzel, Paul
- 7 17
- Stitzel, Paul
- Rating Change
924±46 + 2 = 926±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 713±48
- McFarland, Marilyn
- 6 7
- +1
- 680±37
- Spitzer, Helga
- 7 17
- Swatek, Glen
- Rating Change
819±37 + 5 = 824±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 761±48
- Beatty, Roslyn
- 19 14
- 0
- 545±41
- Schofield, Joan
- 12 13
- Symes, Brendon
- Rating Change
668±43 + 9 = 677±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 650±41
- Gall, Liz
- 7 3 9 6
- −2
- 900±110
- Hyde, David
- 6 5 5 −13 6
- Szabo, Katalin
- Rating Change
797±36 − 5 = 792±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 892±48
- Menzies, Ruth
- −19 13 16
- −1
- 1016±45
- Roberts, Peter
- 14 11
- Talolin, Nick
- Rating Change
1231±52 − 14 = 1217±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 1255±41
- Harrison, Leigh
- 7 10 9 −7 −7 7
- −1
- 1512±46
- Tang, Haine
- 4 9 1 6
- Tang, Haine
- Rating Change
1503±47 + 10 = 1513±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1456±34
- Gormann, Ben
- −4 9 −8 3 6 4
- +1
- 1217±49
- Talolin, Nick
- 4 9 1 6
- Thomas, Margaret
- Rating Change
893±35 + 2 = 895±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 714±49
- McFarland, Marilyn
- 17 15
- +1
- 680±37
- Spitzer, Helga
- 13 12
- Uglow, Laurie
- Rating Change
896±47 + 9 = 905±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 915±50
- Menzies, Ruth
- 16 12
- −5
- 1013±45
- Roberts, Peter
- 13 7
- Van Veen, Peter
- Rating Change
649±45 + 24 = 673±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 664±41
- Falconer, Colin
- −11 5 8 7 9
- +11
- 637±40
- Wakefield, Paul
- 12 −8 6 −10 8 8
- Wakefield, Paul
- Rating Change
652±42 − 24 = 628±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 591±42
- Salgueiro, Christian
- 9 −9 7 12 11
- −9
- 662±46
- Van Veen, Peter
- 12 −8 6 −10 8 8
- Waters, Peter
- Rating Change
1348±42 − 19 = 1329±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 1273±31
- Keating, John
- 9 7 7 −6 7
- −2
- 1516±96
- Slater, Terry
- 3 11 −7 8 −5 3
- White, Steve
- Rating Change
821±45 + 4 = 825±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 807±42
- Wilson, Les
- 7 9 9 5
- −6
- 914±48
- Oliver, Sue
- −5 13 5 9 9
- Wilson, Les
- Rating Change
812±44 − 18 = 794±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 814±43
- White, Steve
- 7 9 9 5
- −6
- 878±73
- Hung, Jeff
- −5 7 −7 5 8 10
- Woodfield, Graham
- Rating Change
1030±41 + 10 = 1040±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1044±42
- Fly, Graham
- 18 18
- −2
- 1222±30
- Marsden, Bob
- 11 8
- Zambrano, Carlos
- Rating Change
1078±41 − 3 = 1075±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1205±43
- Dyer, Terry
- 9 9 7 11
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 76. Matches: 72. Club: Croydon and Districts Table Tennis Association. Province: VIC. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bristowe, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 29295. Submitted: 2018-05-23 7:48 am EDT. Revised: 2021-01-09 1:28 pm EST. Last processed: 2021-01-15 8:45 pm EST.