TTSA Winter Pennant 2018 Week 1
2018-05-07
Detailed Report

• Abdilla, George
• Rating Change
  1751​±33 − 2 = 1749​±31
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +3
• 1664​±78
• Ey, James
• 6 9 9
• −6
• 1756​±69
• Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
• 8 7 6
• +1
• 1533​±57
• Salvagno, Riccardo
• 4 8 7
•  
• Adams, Mike
• Rating Change
  736​±76 + 43 = 779​±72
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +23
• 692​±67
• Wauchope, Peter
• 1 4 3
• +13
• 646​±55
• Willis, Aiden
• 7 2 0
• +7
• 592​±107
• Rosling, Lu
• −9 6 3 0
•  
• Allen, Keith
• Rating Change
  1523​±80 − 63 = 1460​±59
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +20
• 1417​±43
• Nguyen, Ricky
• 4 11 −10 10
• −64
• 1351​±42
• Du, Sally
• 9 9 6
• −20
• 1507​±52
• Du, Phat Tang
• 4 −10 7 9
•  
• Andreoni, Eric
• Rating Change
  1240​±79 − 11 = 1229​±60
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +28
• 1250​±78
• Teagle, Ken
• 10 −9 7 10
• −28
• 1250​±86
• Ciantar, Robert
• −7 9 12 10
• −10
• 1342​±35
• Farley, Craig
• −9 2 −9 7 9
•  
• Au-Duong, Terence
• Rating Change
  1177​±48 + 43 = 1220​±45
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +21
• 1283​±73
• McCauley, Peter
• −7 6 4 9
• +15
• 1222​±62
• Jones, Stephen
• −8 8 3 10
• +7
• 1132​±45
• Lawrie, Lynda
• −4 −12 5 6 9
•  
• Aufiero, Stefan
• Rating Change
  1400​±200 − 146 = 1254​±139
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −113
• 1449​±52
• Verrusio, Adrian
• 10 19 −4 2
• −25
• 1514​±51
• Neubauer, Ken
• −10 11 −8 5 5
• −8
• 1576​±48
• Bates, Stephen
• 9 7 −6 8
•  
• Barry, Robert
• Rating Change
  827​±122 + 82 = 909​±90
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +62
• 815​±57
• Franklin, Owen
• 10 5 5
• −5
• 1187​±85
• Grounds, Roger
• 10 −4 7 −4 7
• +26
• 781​±64
• Grounds, William
• 7 1 −9 11
•  
• Bates, Stephen
• Rating Change
  1630​±54 − 55 = 1575​±47
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +1
• 1263​±143
• Aufiero, Stefan
• 9 7 −6 8
• −32
• 1437​±62
• Harrison, Keegan
• −8 9 −4 8 9
• −23
• 1504​±52
• Oduyemi, Razaq
• 6 −5 6 4
•  
• Beames, Max
• Rating Change
  789​±53 − 32 = 757​±48
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• 0*
• 643​±47
• Du, Daniel
• −8 0 1 5
• −24*
• 643​±47
• Du, Daniel
• −8 9 6 3
• −8
• 845​±58
• Nguyen, William
• −12 5 4 8
•  
• Bohdan, Victor
• Rating Change
  1037​±79 + 14 = 1051​±63
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +36
• 1093​±73
• Camillo, John
• 3 5 −9 −9 8
• −27
• 1065​±66
• Vernik, Kamilo
• 9 10 5
• +6
• 865​±76
• Vuong, Tuan
• 7 −5 −3 3 11
•  
• Bonner, Beverley
• Rating Change
  871​±77 + 14 = 885​±69
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +11
• 729​±122
• Mott, Andrew
• 8 2 2
• −7
• 1103​±116
• Marchesan, Anthony
• 8 6 3
• +10
• 729​±122
• Kemp, Linda
• 4 3 3
•  
• Brougham, Eileen
• Rating Change
  789​±94 − 36 = 753​±77
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −21
• 917​±71
• Chen, Oscar
• −12 9 9 8
• −13
• 922​±79
• Li, Glen
• 4 9 3
• −2
• 1105​±107
• Gerges, Youssef
• −7 −10 10 11 6
•  
• Bu, Bruce
• Rating Change
  1137​±75 + 18 = 1155​±60
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +33
• 1185​±72
• Waugh, Lionel
• −9 11 9 8
• −24
• 1174​±73
• Hughes, Oliver
• −3 6 3 −5 5
• +9
• 1030​±63
• Peters, Shane
• 6 −4 8 5
•  
• Bui, Viet
• Rating Change
  1727​±78 + 50 = 1777​±72
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +31
• 1716​±41
• Glassenbury, Paul
• −9 9 9 10
• 0
• 2200​±79
• Langley, Paul
• 4 7 6
• +19
• 1692​±44
• Langley, Dyson
• −6 8 −9 5 1
•  
• Burrows, Alana
• Rating Change
  931​±50 − 3 = 928​±45
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +7
• 835​±79
• Duong, Bill
• 4 −9 9 6
• −12
• 935​±96
• Lim, Jason
• −4 17 −10 7 4
• +2
• 711​±115
• Le, Bruce
• 4 6 2
•  
• Burrows, Hayden
• Rating Change
  907​±55 + 40 = 947​±54
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +28
• 1088​±115
• Lim, Jason
• 10 7 −5 9
• +8
• 839​±80
• Duong, Bill
• −10 9 11 6
• +3
• 715​±116
• Le, Bruce
• 2 4 −6 9
•  
• Camillo, John
• Rating Change
  1117​±85 − 70 = 1047​±63
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +17
• 984​±101
• Surman, Theresa
• 7 8 10
• −51
• 979​±107
• Ladduwahetty, Tharin
• 8 6 −6 −9 6
• −35
• 1019​±67
• Bohdan, Victor
• 3 5 −9 −9 8
•  
• Campbell, Brooke
• Rating Change
  876​±57 − 28 = 848​±47
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 722​±117
• Le, Bruce
• −8 −12 8 9 8
• −27
• 743​±98
• Duong, Bill
• 8 7 −8 9
• −7
• 952​±94
• Lim, Jason
• 6 −6 10 8
•  
• Chan, Allen
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 + 104 = 1104​±86
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +96
• 1030​±52
• Goh, Hanna
• 3 8 7
• −34
• 1191​±50
• Fung, Jasmine
• 7 6 5
• +42
• 1029​±48
• Chandrasena, Samadhi
• 12 −8 11 −8 5
•  
• Chan, Michelle
• Rating Change
  1512​±58 + 21 = 1533​±57
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +14
• 1477​±69
• Coxon, Andy
• 10 −8 −4 8 5
• +5
• 1364​±45
• Coombes, Julie
• 7 6 5
• +2
• 1296​±74
• Mitchell, Phil
• −10 4 9 8
•  
• Chandrasena, Samadhi
• Rating Change
  1039​±50 − 19 = 1020​±46
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −11
• 1069​±100
• Chan, Allen
• 12 −8 11 −8 5
• −6
• 1148​±112
• Jiang, Jiong
• −8 9 −6 4 4
• −4
• 1180​±49
• Darwent, Dawn
• −8 −9 8 4 1
•  
• Chapman, Andrew
• Rating Change
  986​±118 − 16 = 970​±95
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +11
• 710​±116
• Mott, Andrew
• 7 11 4
• −37
• 1082​±118
• Marchesan, Anthony
• −11 6 8 3
• +9
• 710​±116
• Kemp, Linda
• 6 6 7
•  
• Chen, Edward
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 − 124 = 876​±113
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −87
• 949​±151
• Luong, Thinh
• 5 7 5
• −23
• 1118​±76
• Dang, Kevin
• 3 6 2
• −14
• 1123​±74
• Hoang, Hung
• 7 3 6
•  
• Chen, Michael
• Rating Change
  1031​±74 − 53 = 978​±58
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −31
• 1020​±59
• Parenti, Stefan
• 12 −5 6 9
• −13
• 1088​±70
• Tun, Jason
• 9 5 5
• −10
• 1098​±69
• Palaniappan, Arjun
• 6 −9 9 9
•  
• Chen, Oscar
• Rating Change
  888​±77 + 32 = 920​±69
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 774​±66
• Willis, Tyler
• 13 7 9
• +10
• 761​±81
• Brougham, Eileen
• −12 9 9 8
• +8
• 734​±124
• Cook, Peter
• 7 5 −8 8
•  
• Cheong, Eagan
• Rating Change
  1316​±115 − 57 = 1259​±72
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +51
• 1285​±53
• Walsh, Dennis
• 12 9 −5 8
• −81
• 1238​±56
• Cheung, Natalie
• −4 −10 4 3 8
• −27
• 1311​±64
• Costabile, Maurizio
• −8 −8 6 11 6
•  
• Cheung, Natalie
• Rating Change
  1240​±64 + 27 = 1267​±54
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +28
• 1318​±84
• Cheong, Eagan
• −4 −10 4 3 8
• −15
• 1305​±84
• Jin, Ming
• 6 5 −15 9
• +14
• 1213​±65
• Ng, Sheldon
• 10 −15 −6 10 17
•  
• Ciantar, Robert
• Rating Change
  1168​±78 + 106 = 1274​±86
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +53
• 1254​±43
• McCloughry, David
• −9 3 7 8
• +39
• 1241​±65
• Andreoni, Eric
• −7 9 12 10
• +14
• 1131​±65
• Roberts, Tony
• −9 7 14 8
•  
• Cook, Peter
• Rating Change
  800​±150 − 83 = 717​±117
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −52
• 916​±70
• Chen, Oscar
• 7 5 −8 8
• −26
• 921​±78
• Li, Glen
• 7 −13 5 5
• −4
• 1102​±107
• Gerges, Youssef
• 4 7 10
•  
• Coombes, Julie
• Rating Change
  1391​±51 − 33 = 1358​±44
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −29
• 1179​±66
• Stevels, Mathijs
• 5 −10 6 7
• −3
• 1528​±58
• Chan, Michelle
• 7 6 5
• 0
• 1695​±52
• Goh, Royce
• 4 7 9
•  
• Costabile, Maurizio
• Rating Change
  1343​±82 − 8 = 1335​±63
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +22
• 1292​±81
• Cheong, Eagan
• −8 −8 6 11 6
• −40
• 1287​±78
• Jin, Ming
• 5 −7 8 −8 8
• +9
• 1201​±63
• Ng, Sheldon
• −7 8 7 −9 10
•  
• Coxon, Andy
• Rating Change
  1482​±75 − 24 = 1458​±62
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +4
• 1237​±68
• Stevels, Mathijs
• 5 6 9
• −24
• 1521​±57
• Chan, Michelle
• 10 −8 −4 8 5
• −3
• 1693​±52
• Goh, Royce
• 9 −9 8 −4 9
•  
• Cunningham, Alex
• Rating Change
  804​±82 − 56 = 748​±65
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −38
• 783​±53
• Woodcock, Thomas
• 5 −9 8 11
• −17
• 831​±75
• Hampel, Bailey
• 10 4 11
•  
• Dang, Kevin
• Rating Change
  1089​±77 + 10 = 1099​±75
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +4
• 796​±128
• Dong, Donny
• 7 8 9
• +3
• 796​±128
• Chen, Edward
• 3 6 2
• +3
• 796​±128
• Young, Tracey
• 2 4 7
•  
• Darwent, Dawn
• Rating Change
  1154​±52 + 31 = 1185​±49
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +23
• 1219​±55
• Fung, Jasmine
• 7 3 −6 10
• +4
• 1024​±48
• Chandrasena, Samadhi
• −8 −9 8 4 1
• +4
• 1023​±52
• Goh, Hanna
• 8 12 11
•  
• Davies, Owen
• Rating Change
  832​±53 + 25 = 857​±48
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 820​±58
• Franklin, Owen
• 9 6 9
• −1
• 1188​±85
• Grounds, Roger
• −9 8 6 9
• +10
• 784​±66
• Grounds, William
• 7 3 7
•  
• Dawe, Andrew
• Rating Change
  1439​±75 − 37 = 1402​±61
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −23
• 1484​±64
• Kappellos, Harry
• 5 6 −9 10
• −12
• 1521​±51
• Tan, Kok Chong
• 8 −9 −5 3 5
• −2
• 1655​±46
• Liang, David
• 5 8 7
•  
• Day, Peter
• Rating Change
  1058​±93 − 6 = 1052​±69
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +34
• 1037​±63
• Peters, Shane
• 9 −3 6 9
• −27
• 1142​±61
• Waugh, Lionel
• 7 −3 9 10
• −12
• 1184​±73
• Hughes, Oliver
• 6 5 −9 8
•  
• Dong, Donny
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 − 124 = 876​±113
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −87
• 949​±151
• Luong, Thinh
• 8 4 3
• −23
• 1118​±76
• Dang, Kevin
• 7 8 9
• −14
• 1123​±74
• Hoang, Hung
• 7 5 7
•  
• Du, Daniel
• Rating Change
  647​±49 + 14 = 661​±44
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +17*
• 769​±51
• Beames, Max
• −8 9 6 3
• 0*
• 769​±51
• Beames, Max
• −8 0 1 5
• −2
• 884​±59
• Lau, Ivan
• 6 5 6
• −1
• 911​±49
• Thomas, Max
• 5 5 4
•  
• Du, Hai
• Rating Change
  1386​±103 − 21 = 1365​±93
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −15
• 1568​±40
• Weaver, Richard
• −5 6 4 −6 6
• −5
• 1634​±46
• Pikula, Sandro
• −8 7 8 −9 7
• −1
• 1762​±46
• Malyschko, Kevin
• 7 8 4
•  
• Du, Nathan
• Rating Change
  655​±49 + 8 = 663​±45
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +17
• 741​±96
• Kohler, Celine
• −9 6 −9 6 7
• −5
• 799​±51
• Thomas, Cam
• 9 8 9
• −3
• 826​±75
• Taneja, Pranjay
• 7 8 −12 9
•  
• Du, Phat Tang
• Rating Change
  1509​±57 + 11 = 1520​±49
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 1479​±64
• Allen, Keith
• 4 −10 7 9
• −16
• 1538​±48
• Malyschko, David
• 6 12 8
• +12
• 1476​±69
• Hadergjoni, Saimir
• −6 14 13 9
•  
• Du, Sally
• Rating Change
  1359​±45 + 11 = 1370​±41
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +20
• 1503​±64
• Allen, Keith
• 9 9 6
• −7
• 1443​±60
• Hadergjoni, Saimir
• 11 −9 −3 5 5
• −2
• 1547​±47
• Malyschko, David
• 2 6 6
•  
• Duong, Bill
• Rating Change
  786​±112 + 35 = 821​±75
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +74
• 877​±54
• Campbell, Brooke
• 8 7 −8 9
• −24
• 928​±48
• Burrows, Alana
• 4 −9 9 6
• −16
• 931​±54
• Burrows, Hayden
• −10 9 11 6
•  
• Duong, Tung
• Rating Change
  800​±150 − 165 = 635​±107
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −119
• 680​±114
• Jain, Isha
• 5 5 7
• −37
• 785​±105
• Jain, Akash
• 8 3 4
• −9
• 919​±101
• Gallage, Kevin
• 5 7 5
•  
• Ebero, Charmae
• Rating Change
  665​±75 + 66 = 731​±65
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +35
• 702​±67
• Wauchope, Peter
• 2 3 0
• +20
• 653​±55
• Willis, Aiden
• 6 4 3
• +11
• 611​±109
• Rosling, Lu
• 2 2 3
•  
• Ey, James
• Rating Change
  1675​±110 − 40 = 1635​±70
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +43
• 1642​±52
• Laan, Nicholas
• 3 6 3
• −68
• 1627​±46
• Joshi, Ankit
• 4 7 8
• −15
• 1744​±31
• Abdilla, George
• 6 9 9
•  
• Fan, Tian Zhang
• Rating Change
  1353​±85 − 20 = 1333​±73
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −15
• 1496​±40
• Milsom, Lucas
• −4 −5 6 4 8
• −4
• 1581​±46
• McDougall, Gary
• 4 −7 5 −8 5
• −1
• 1741​±87
• Ruanglertboon, Warit Will
• 2 −7 3 −9 6
•  
• Farley, Craig
• Rating Change
  1336​±35 + 7 = 1343​±35
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +4
• 1244​±43
• McCloughry, David
• 6 4 −10 −8 2
• +3
• 1221​±63
• Andreoni, Eric
• −9 2 −9 7 9
• +1
• 1116​±62
• Roberts, Tony
• 8 7 8
•  
• Ferro, Tony
• Rating Change
  1409​±73 − 11 = 1398​±56
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +28
• 1405​±49
• Liang, Heng Qian
• 3 −8 9 −8 8
• −50
• 1266​±45
• Smiech, Alex
• 10 7 −9 7
• +11
• 1304​±63
• Tomaselli, Rodney
• 5 4 5
•  
• Fong, Yik Long
• Rating Change
  1064​±74 + 40 = 1104​±67
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +54
• 1277​±79
• Vishwachandra, Chamal
• 7 7 9
• −11
• 1222​±91
• Phung, Chris
• 6 8 10
• −3
• 1322​±65
• Norton, Frances
• 4 8 4
•  
• Franklin, Owen
• Rating Change
  854​±65 − 49 = 805​±55
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −25
• 846​±51
• Davies, Owen
• 9 6 9
• −13
• 882​±99
• Barry, Robert
• 10 5 5
• −11
• 902​±49
• Thomas, Max
• 11 8 4
•  
• Fung, Jasmine
• Rating Change
  1205​±55 + 4 = 1209​±48
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +16
• 1300​±152
• Jiang, Jiong
• −7 −9 6 5 8
• −22
• 1167​±50
• Darwent, Dawn
• 7 3 −6 10
• +9
• 1151​±104
• Chan, Allen
• 7 6 5
•  
• Gallage, Kevin
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 − 42 = 958​±93
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +104
• 1005​±76
• Le, Tuan Quang
• 9 −5 −11 10 17
• −156
• 837​±56
• Nguyen, William
• 8 3 8
• +10
• 710​±124
• Duong, Tung
• 5 7 5
•  
• Gerges, Youssef
• Rating Change
  1091​±110 + 10 = 1101​±107
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +4
• 765​±64
• Willis, Tyler
• 5 6 −10 9
• +3
• 748​±77
• Brougham, Eileen
• −7 −10 10 11 6
• +3
• 709​±116
• Cook, Peter
• 4 7 10
•  
• Ghulami, Mustafa
• Rating Change
  800​±150 − 126 = 674​±108
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −95
• 789​±52
• Woodcock, Thomas
• 6 6 4
• −30
• 837​±74
• Hampel, Bailey
• 7 11 7
•  
• Glassenbury, Paul
• Rating Change
  1702​±42 + 5 = 1707​±39
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +16
• 1804​±70
• Luong, Liem
• 8 −4 7 −8 4
• −8
• 1749​±74
• Bui, Viet
• −9 9 9 10
• −3
• 1850​±64
• Phan, An
• 3 −7 3 9
•  
• Goh, Hanna
• Rating Change
  1043​±56 − 25 = 1018​±50
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −13
• 1069​±100
• Chan, Allen
• 3 8 7
• −7
• 1147​±112
• Jiang, Jiong
• 9 14 −8 9
• −4
• 1180​±49
• Darwent, Dawn
• 8 12 11
•  
• Goh, Royce
• Rating Change
  1692​±53 + 2 = 1694​±52
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 1459​±64
• Coxon, Andy
• 9 −9 8 −4 9
• 0
• 1360​±44
• Coombes, Julie
• 4 7 9
• 0
• 1291​±70
• Mitchell, Phil
• 5 7 6
•  
• Golobokov, Pavel
• Rating Change
  1712​±70 + 39 = 1751​±62
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +32
• 1768​±62
• Vanderklugt, Alex
• 9 10 −9 6
• −7
• 1902​±68
• Swanson, Alex
• 6 5 5
• +14
• 1671​±53
• Zhang, Michael
• −10 5 7 11
•  
• Gong, Charlie
• Rating Change
  910​±79 + 7 = 917​±71
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 719​±120
• Mott, Andrew
• 5 1 10
• −10
• 1097​±118
• Marchesan, Anthony
• 8 4 5
• +8
• 719​±120
• Kemp, Linda
• 1 3 4
•  
• Grant, Paul
• Rating Change
  1500​±76 − 29 = 1471​±60
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +20
• 1427​±61
• To, Tuan Minh
• −8 −7 5 6 8
• −50
• 1366​±59
• Nguyen, Sinh
• 6 6 11
• 0
• 1064​±51
• Nguyen, Jennifer
• 7 9 7
•  
• Grounds, Roger
• Rating Change
  1183​±87 + 10 = 1193​±84
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 932​±95
• Barry, Robert
• 10 −4 7 −4 7
• +3
• 913​±49
• Thomas, Max
• 4 4 3
• +2
• 862​±49
• Davies, Owen
• −9 8 6 9
•  
• Grounds, William
• Rating Change
  823​±79 − 51 = 772​±62
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −28
• 850​±50
• Davies, Owen
• 7 3 7
• −13
• 892​±98
• Barry, Robert
• 7 1 −9 11
• −10
• 904​±49
• Thomas, Max
• 8 7 6
•  
• Hadergjoni, Saimir
• Rating Change
  1441​±73 + 18 = 1459​±57
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +24
• 1422​±44
• Nguyen, Ricky
• 6 11 −4 −11 10
• −18
• 1514​±51
• Du, Phat Tang
• −6 14 13 9
• +13
• 1378​±44
• Du, Sally
• 11 −9 −3 5 5
•  
• Hagel, Scott
• Rating Change
  1301​±67 − 16 = 1285​±55
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +17
• 1245​±54
• Pannewig, Honey
• 12 9 −8 −10 3
• −24
• 1303​±73
• Taylor, Lucjan
• 8 −7 1 −11 8
• −10
• 1378​±156
• Tomas, John Caesar II
• 10 5 9
•  
• Hampel, Bailey
• Rating Change
  791​±75 + 57 = 848​±74
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +26
• 778​±73
• Vishwachandra, Mihiri
• −5 6 8 7
• +20
• 768​±69
• Cunningham, Alex
• 10 4 11
• +11
• 707​±119
• Ghulami, Mustafa
• 7 11 7
•  
• Harrison, Keegan
• Rating Change
  1424​±74 + 62 = 1486​±65
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +53
• 1606​±49
• Bates, Stephen
• −8 9 −4 8 9
• −17
• 1512​±52
• Neubauer, Ken
• −7 6 7 −10 12
• +27
• 1480​±58
• Verrusio, Adrian
• 9 −3 8 −9 8
•  
• Hartnett, Dennis
• Rating Change
  1197​±73 − 12 = 1185​±57
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +21
• 1137​±62
• Tan, Ling
• 4 4 9
• −50
• 942​±121
• Zulfic, Ismet
• 7 5 −4 −8 12
• +16
• 1129​±44
• Mitev, Thomas
• 8 −8 −11 12 8
•  
• Hayter, Steve
• Rating Change
  1237​±78 + 30 = 1267​±74
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 1130​±75
• Palaniappan, Arjun
• 9 8 2
• +11
• 1121​±75
• Tun, Jason
• −10 3 4 8
• +4
• 1045​±61
• Parenti, Stefan
• 8 9 7
•  
• Hoang, Hung
• Rating Change
  1097​±74 + 9 = 1106​±72
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +3
• 795​±128
• Chen, Edward
• 7 3 6
• +3
• 795​±128
• Dong, Donny
• 7 5 7
• +3
• 795​±128
• Young, Tracey
• 7 4 9
•  
• Houston, Scott A
• Rating Change
  2122​±81 + 19 = 2141​±79
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +14
• 2004​±131
• Wang, Stephen
• 7 3 9
• +4
• 1860​±114
• Ngu, Ing Hung Stephy
• 8 8 −8 8
• +1
• 1807​±42
• Lee, Isaiah
• 7 9 6
•  
• Hu, Eric
• Rating Change
  1252​±83 − 26 = 1226​±62
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +47
• 1368​±77
• Norton, Frances
• 9 −7 9 8
• −42
• 1186​±85
• Phung, Chris
• −8 6 4 6
• −30
• 1194​±64
• Vishwachandra, Chamal
• 6 9 7
•  
• Hughes, Oliver
• Rating Change
  1144​±76 + 61 = 1205​±74
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +36
• 1184​±74
• Bu, Bruce
• −3 6 3 −5 5
• +14
• 1077​±63
• Lee, Andrew
• 8 9 8
• +12
• 1075​±75
• Day, Peter
• 6 5 −9 8
•  
• Jain, Akash
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 − 160 = 840​±93
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +27
• 710​±124
• Duong, Tung
• 8 3 4
• −156
• 837​±56
• Nguyen, William
• −8 7 8 −7 10
• −31
• 962​±67
• Le, Tuan Quang
• −11 8 8 8
•  
• Jain, Isha
• Rating Change
  800​±150 − 30 = 770​±98
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +57
• 744​±130
• Duong, Tung
• 5 5 7
• −74
• 848​±56
• Nguyen, William
• 7 8 8
• −13
• 975​±67
• Le, Tuan Quang
• 8 −8 4 7
•  
• Jiang, Jiong
• Rating Change
  1200​±200 − 35 = 1165​±100
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +75
• 1022​±47
• Chandrasena, Samadhi
• −8 9 −6 4 4
• −141
• 1186​±50
• Fung, Jasmine
• −7 −9 6 5 8
• +31
• 1022​±51
• Goh, Hanna
• 9 14 −8 9
•  
• Jin, Ming
• Rating Change
  1214​±75 + 132 = 1346​±87
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +60
• 1383​±82
• Costabile, Maurizio
• 5 −7 8 −8 8
• +41
• 1297​±54
• Walsh, Dennis
• 4 10 6
• +31
• 1284​±60
• Cheung, Natalie
• 6 5 −15 9
•  
• Jones, Stephen
• Rating Change
  1216​±67 − 20 = 1196​±56
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 1079​±68
• Nguyen, Thoi
• 8 8 −9 10
• −27
• 1206​±46
• Au-Duong, Terence
• −8 8 3 10
• −3
• 1437​±93
• Le, Triet
• −8 −8 7 3 8
•  
• Joshi, Ankit
• Rating Change
  1630​±50 + 18 = 1648​±46
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +17
• 1690​±79
• Ey, James
• 4 7 8
• −5
• 1774​±70
• Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
• 10 15 6
• +6
• 1542​±60
• Salvagno, Riccardo
• −7 11 7 9
•  
• Kappellos, Harry
• Rating Change
  1520​±78 − 27 = 1493​±59
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 1415​±64
• Dawe, Andrew
• 5 6 −9 10
• −29
• 1538​±47
• Stevels, Lenno
• 6 5 −8 8
• −13
• 1588​±66
• Rochow, Ian
• 9 6 9
•  
• Kemp, Linda
• Rating Change
  800​±150 − 102 = 698​±112
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −65
• 874​±70
• Bonner, Beverley
• 4 3 3
• −25
• 908​±72
• Gong, Charlie
• 1 3 4
• −12
• 961​±98
• Chapman, Andrew
• 6 6 7
•  
• Kohler, Celine
• Rating Change
  865​±115 − 214 = 651​±83
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −136
• 646​±46
• Du, Nathan
• −9 6 −9 6 7
• −55
• 668​±108
• Vo, Huyen
• 6 2 3
• −23
• 768​±66
• Nguyen, Cindy
• 9 4 5
•  
• Laan, Nicholas
• Rating Change
  1702​±72 − 77 = 1625​±50
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −50
• 1491​±57
• Salvagno, Riccardo
• −9 9 11 −9 7
• −22
• 1593​±80
• Ey, James
• 3 6 3
• −6
• 1767​±69
• Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
• 6 9 3
•  
• Ladduwahetty, Tharin
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 + 59 = 1059​±90
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +110
• 1084​±70
• Camillo, John
• 8 6 −6 −9 6
• −65
• 1072​±64
• Vernik, Kamilo
• 9 4 16
• +15
• 867​±75
• Vuong, Tuan
• 5 6 9
•  
• Langhans, Geoffrey
• Rating Change
  1330​±64 + 19 = 1349​±56
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +32
• 1433​±63
• Nguyen, Sinh
• 6 8 7
• −14
• 1403​±58
• To, Tuan Minh
• 9 4 −8 8
• +1
• 1066​±52
• Nguyen, Jennifer
• 8 10 5
•  
• Langley, Dyson
• Rating Change
  1671​±47 + 12 = 1683​±43
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +26
• 1917​±70
• Phan, An
• −10 −6 7 8 5
• −7
• 1750​±62
• Luong, Liem
• 9 8 −14 −8 3
• −6
• 1755​±74
• Bui, Viet
• −6 8 −9 5 1
•  
• Langley, Paul
• Rating Change
  2196​±80 + 3 = 2199​±79
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +1
• 1859​±63
• Phan, An
• 10 8 7
• 0
• 1772​±73
• Bui, Viet
• 4 7 6
• 0
• 1763​±59
• Luong, Liem
• −8 8 7 −11 6
•  
• Lau, Ivan
• Rating Change
  849​±57 + 47 = 896​±59
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +25
• 909​±69
• Tran, Duy
• 3 3 5
• +20
• 884​±61
• Nguyen, William
• 6 11 −7 4
• +2
• 665​±45
• Du, Daniel
• 6 5 6
•  
• Lawrie, Lynda
• Rating Change
  1122​±47 + 3 = 1125​±43
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +10
• 1093​±71
• Nguyen, Thoi
• −6 7 14 9
• −7
• 1212​±46
• Au-Duong, Terence
• −4 −12 5 6 9
• −1
• 1443​±92
• Le, Triet
• 9 7 −10 8
•  
• Le-Tran, Huy
• Rating Change
  1057​±38 + 18 = 1075​±36
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +14
• 1161​±64
• Tan, Ling
• 9 6 10
• −6
• 1114​±43
• Mitev, Thomas
• 8 −10 9 6
• +10
• 1155​±109
• Zulfic, Ismet
• 7 4 7
•  
• Le, Bruce
• Rating Change
  800​±150 − 105 = 695​±110
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −74
• 849​±49
• Campbell, Brooke
• −8 −12 8 9 8
• −18
• 928​±47
• Burrows, Alana
• 4 6 2
• −12
• 931​±54
• Burrows, Hayden
• 2 4 −6 9
•  
• Le, Su
• Rating Change
  1407​±74 − 10 = 1397​±57
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +30
• 1405​±49
• Liang, Heng Qian
• 4 7 9
• −49
• 1253​±63
• Tomaselli, Rodney
• 5 3 −3 −9 9
• +10
• 1292​±44
• Smiech, Alex
• −8 −8 8 8 7
•  
• Le, Triet
• Rating Change
  1415​±97 + 23 = 1438​±92
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +14
• 1246​±64
• McCauley, Peter
• 9 −10 8 7
• +7
• 1198​±57
• Jones, Stephen
• −8 −8 7 3 8
• +2
• 1124​±43
• Lawrie, Lynda
• 9 7 −10 8
•  
• Le, Tuan Quang
• Rating Change
  973​±75 − 19 = 954​±62
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +13
• 856​±107
• Jain, Akash
• −11 8 8 8
• −38
• 856​±107
• Gallage, Kevin
• 9 −5 −11 10 17
• +6
• 759​±104
• Jain, Isha
• 8 −8 4 7
•  
• Lee, Andrew
• Rating Change
  1066​±75 − 6 = 1060​±58
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +22
• 1037​±63
• Peters, Shane
• 6 15 5
• −19
• 1141​±62
• Waugh, Lionel
• −5 9 −5 5 12
• −9
• 1183​±74
• Hughes, Oliver
• 8 9 8
•  
• Lee, Isaiah
• Rating Change
  1806​±47 + 0 = 1806​±41
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +17
• 1890​±62
• Liang, Keyman
• 9 −6 −6 9 9
• −16
• 1774​±33
• Rogers, Mitchell
• 8 8 4
• 0
• 2135​±80
• Houston, Scott A
• 7 9 6
•  
• Li, Glen
• Rating Change
  890​±82 + 35 = 925​±77
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +16
• 774​±65
• Willis, Tyler
• 8 −8 12 9
• +11
• 761​±81
• Brougham, Eileen
• 4 9 3
• +9
• 733​±123
• Cook, Peter
• 7 −13 5 5
•  
• Liang, David
• Rating Change
  1637​±48 + 20 = 1657​±46
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +12
• 1635​±78
• Rochow, Ian
• 1 3 9
• +7
• 1557​±47
• Stevels, Lenno
• −8 5 11 8
• +1
• 1406​±62
• Dawe, Andrew
• 5 8 7
•  
• Liang, Heng Qian
• Rating Change
  1454​±55 − 65 = 1389​±46
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −30
• 1317​±62
• Lowe, David
• 5 7 8
• −20
• 1375​±59
• Ferro, Tony
• 3 −8 9 −8 8
• −16
• 1379​±60
• Le, Su
• 4 7 9
•  
• Liang, Keyman
• Rating Change
  1896​±66 − 33 = 1863​±55
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +20
• 1940​±136
• Ngu, Ing Hung Stephy
• 7 −3 2 3
• −40
• 1790​±41
• Lee, Isaiah
• 9 −6 −6 9 9
• −13
• 1892​±126
• Wang, Stephen
• 8 −9 8 10
•  
• Lim, Jason
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 − 17 = 983​±86
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +80
• 941​±50
• Burrows, Alana
• −4 17 −10 7 4
• −122
• 921​±53
• Burrows, Hayden
• 10 7 −5 9
• +25
• 863​±51
• Campbell, Brooke
• 6 −6 10 8
•  
• Lowe, David
• Rating Change
  1269​±66 + 91 = 1360​±66
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +48
• 1417​±49
• Liang, Heng Qian
• 5 7 8
• +24
• 1323​±66
• Tomaselli, Rodney
• 11 9 −8 4
• +18
• 1301​±45
• Smiech, Alex
• 3 −10 6 12
•  
• Lu, Jason
• Rating Change
  1533​±73 + 48 = 1581​±64
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +38
• 1603​±53
• McDougall, Gary
• 9 9 −9 9
• −8
• 1733​±89
• Ruanglertboon, Warit Will
• −7 9 5 −8 8
• +17
• 1508​±42
• Milsom, Lucas
• 5 8 1
•  
• Luong, Liem
• Rating Change
  1794​±73 − 31 = 1763​±59
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 1689​±44
• Langley, Dyson
• 9 8 −14 −8 3
• −45
• 1692​±40
• Glassenbury, Paul
• 8 −4 7 −8 4
• 0
• 2200​±79
• Langley, Paul
• −8 8 7 −11 6
•  
• Luong, Thinh
• Rating Change
  367​±193 + 619 = 986​±128
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +390
• 911​±116
• Dong, Donny
• 8 4 3
• +155
• 911​±116
• Young, Tracey
• 3 6 −12 13
• +74
• 911​±116
• Chen, Edward
• 5 7 5
•  
• Maddigan, Damien
• Rating Change
  1361​±70 − 36 = 1325​±57
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 1065​±52
• Nguyen, Jennifer
• 8 9 9
• −23
• 1382​±59
• Nguyen, Sinh
• 8 8 11
• −14
• 1400​±58
• To, Tuan Minh
• −9 −6 11 11 8
•  
• Malyschko, David
• Rating Change
  1565​±51 − 14 = 1551​±46
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 1536​±51
• Du, Phat Tang
• 6 12 8
• −32
• 1389​±43
• Nguyen, Ricky
• 9 −10 6 −4 9
• +3
• 1373​±43
• Du, Sally
• 2 6 6
•  

• Malyschko, Kevin
• Rating Change
  1759​±46 + 3 = 1762​±46
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 1554​±51
• Truong, Jayden
• 9 9 −12 10
• +1
• 1520​±59
• Sharma, Manoj
• 2 −3 9 8
• 0
• 1367​±94
• Du, Hai
• 7 8 4
•  
• Marchesan, Anthony
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 + 132 = 1132​±109
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +89
• 1024​±110
• Chapman, Andrew
• −11 6 8 3
• +29
• 937​±75
• Gong, Charlie
• 8 4 5
• +14
• 902​±76
• Bonner, Beverley
• 8 6 3
•  
• McCauley, Peter
• Rating Change
  1293​±86 − 53 = 1240​±61
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +7
• 1074​±67
• Nguyen, Thoi
• −11 4 −4 7 9
• −53
• 1201​±45
• Au-Duong, Terence
• −7 6 4 9
• −6
• 1428​±94
• Le, Triet
• 9 −10 8 7
•  
• McCloughry, David
• Rating Change
  1281​±49 − 39 = 1242​±42
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −21
• 1184​±62
• Teagle, Ken
• −8 10 8 7
• −13
• 1236​±83
• Ciantar, Robert
• −9 3 7 8
• −6
• 1341​±35
• Farley, Craig
• 6 4 −10 −8 2
•  
• McDougall, Gary
• Rating Change
  1594​±53 − 13 = 1581​±45
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +5
• 1464​±61
• Wang, Yanhan Dennis
• 11 −6 6 −9 12
• −19
• 1546​±64
• Lu, Jason
• 9 9 −9 9
• +1
• 1337​±75
• Fan, Tian Zhang
• 4 −7 5 −8 5
•  
• Milsom, Lucas
• Rating Change
  1494​±43 + 6 = 1500​±40
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 1477​±63
• Wang, Yanhan Dennis
• −9 8 −11 9 2
• −7
• 1561​±66
• Lu, Jason
• 5 8 1
• +3
• 1345​±78
• Fan, Tian Zhang
• −4 −5 6 4 8
•  
• Mitchell, Phil
• Rating Change
  1279​±78 + 20 = 1299​±70
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +25
• 1260​±78
• Stevels, Mathijs
• 3 7 6
• −5
• 1533​±57
• Chan, Michelle
• −10 4 9 8
• 0
• 1695​±52
• Goh, Royce
• 5 7 6
•  
• Mitev, Thomas
• Rating Change
  1139​±48 − 16 = 1123​±42
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 1079​±38
• Le-Tran, Huy
• 8 −10 9 6
• −18
• 1083​±60
• Pilavci, Omer
• 5 6 8
• −7
• 1202​±65
• Hartnett, Dennis
• 8 −8 −11 12 8
•  
• Mott, Andrew
• Rating Change
  800​±150 − 102 = 698​±112
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −65
• 874​±70
• Bonner, Beverley
• 8 2 2
• −25
• 908​±72
• Gong, Charlie
• 5 1 10
• −12
• 961​±98
• Chapman, Andrew
• 7 11 4
•  
• Neubauer, Ken
• Rating Change
  1525​±57 − 1 = 1524​±50
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +16
• 1524​±88
• Harrison, Keegan
• −7 6 7 −10 12
• −20
• 1515​±53
• Oduyemi, Razaq
• −7 8 10 2
• +3
• 1277​±148
• Aufiero, Stefan
• −10 11 −8 5 5
•  
• Ng, Sheldon
• Rating Change
  1253​±84 − 66 = 1187​±59
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −37
• 1240​±56
• Cheung, Natalie
• 10 −15 −6 10 17
• −19
• 1259​±53
• Walsh, Dennis
• −5 4 5 −7 5
• −9
• 1315​±65
• Costabile, Maurizio
• −7 8 7 −9 10
•  
• Ngu, Ing Hung Stephy
• Rating Change
  1922​±242 − 90 = 1832​±104
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +119
• 1785​±34
• Rogers, Mitchell
• 8 −7 7 −6 5
• −203
• 1845​±57
• Liang, Keyman
• 7 −3 2 3
• −6
• 2128​±80
• Houston, Scott A
• 8 8 −8 8
•  
• Nguyen, Cindy
• Rating Change
  754​±82 + 36 = 790​±65
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +45
• 827​±57
• Thomas, Cam
• 7 9 4
• −24
• 815​±74
• Taneja, Pranjay
• 4 8 −10 −8 8
• +15
• 704​±94
• Kohler, Celine
• 9 4 5
•  
• Nguyen, Jennifer
• Rating Change
  1067​±53 − 3 = 1064​±51
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −2
• 1323​±58
• Maddigan, Damien
• 8 9 9
• −1
• 1341​±56
• Langhans, Geoffrey
• 8 10 5
• 0
• 1470​±61
• Grant, Paul
• 7 9 7
•  
• Nguyen, Ricky
• Rating Change
  1403​±46 + 5 = 1408​±41
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +23
• 1578​±48
• Malyschko, David
• 9 −10 6 −4 9
• −10
• 1437​±60
• Hadergjoni, Saimir
• 6 11 −4 −11 10
• −8
• 1442​±63
• Allen, Keith
• 4 11 −10 10
•  
• Nguyen, Sinh
• Rating Change
  1374​±69 + 23 = 1397​±56
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +42
• 1515​±73
• Grant, Paul
• 6 6 11
• −34
• 1317​±58
• Langhans, Geoffrey
• 6 8 7
• +15
• 1341​±61
• Maddigan, Damien
• 8 8 11
•  
• Nguyen, Thoi
• Rating Change
  1120​±83 − 59 = 1061​±64
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −37
• 1112​±44
• Lawrie, Lynda
• −6 7 14 9
• −14
• 1182​±58
• Jones, Stephen
• 8 8 −9 10
• −7
• 1229​±63
• McCauley, Peter
• −11 4 −4 7 9
•  
• Nguyen, William
• Rating Change
  737​±72 + 144 = 881​±55
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +57
• 1092​±118
• Gallage, Kevin
• 8 3 8
• −10
• 880​±59
• Lau, Ivan
• 6 11 −7 4
• +47
• 945​±57
• Thomas, Max
• 5 6 6
• +27
• 937​±109
• Jain, Akash
• −8 7 8 −7 10
• +14
• 829​±112
• Jain, Isha
• 7 8 8
• +9
• 766​±49
• Beames, Max
• −12 5 4 8
•  
• Northeast, Tania
• Rating Change
  1282​±81 − 94 = 1188​±61
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −47
• 1179​±82
• Phung, Chris
• 7 8 −8 9
• −35
• 1189​±64
• Vishwachandra, Chamal
• 6 −8 8 −10 6
• −12
• 1304​±68
• Norton, Frances
• 6 6 7
•  
• Norton, Frances
• Rating Change
  1344​±80 − 42 = 1302​±64
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +14
• 1193​±65
• Northeast, Tania
• 6 6 7
• −60
• 1171​±66
• Hu, Eric
• 9 −7 9 8
• +4
• 1085​±64
• Fong, Yik Long
• 4 8 4
•  
• Oduyemi, Razaq
• Rating Change
  1509​±59 + 21 = 1530​±50
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +31
• 1602​±50
• Bates, Stephen
• 6 −5 6 4
• −29
• 1432​±54
• Verrusio, Adrian
• −6 8 −7 5 8
• +19
• 1540​±55
• Neubauer, Ken
• −7 8 10 2
•  
• Palaniappan, Arjun
• Rating Change
  1110​±78 + 5 = 1115​±66
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +14
• 997​±62
• Chen, Michael
• 6 −9 9 9
• −13
• 1257​±75
• Hayter, Steve
• 9 8 2
• +4
• 883​±84
• Zhang, Peter
• 10 4 9
•  
• Pandit, Sharad
• Rating Change
  1906​±56 + 26 = 1932​±53
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +21
• 1947​±80
• Swanson, Alex
• 4 8 10
• +4
• 1747​±60
• Vanderklugt, Alex
• 9 6 8
• +1
• 1660​±51
• Zhang, Michael
• 8 5 7
•  
• Pannewig, Honey
• Rating Change
  1278​±61 − 51 = 1227​±50
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 970​±135
• Puttikul, Natee
• −10 6 4 6
• −39
• 1087​±66
• Sefin, Ahmed
• 9 9 6
• −14
• 1266​±59
• Hagel, Scott
• 12 9 −8 −10 3
•  
• Parenti, Stefan
• Rating Change
  1084​±82 − 49 = 1035​±57
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +17
• 999​±62
• Chen, Michael
• 12 −5 6 9
• −63
• 803​±72
• Zhang, Peter
• 9 −7 −4 6 9
• −3
• 1259​±75
• Hayter, Steve
• 8 9 7
•  
• Peters, Shane
• Rating Change
  1083​±77 − 73 = 1010​±59
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −39
• 1016​±76
• Day, Peter
• 9 −3 6 9
• −25
• 1036​±62
• Lee, Andrew
• 6 15 5
• −9
• 1138​±62
• Bu, Bruce
• 6 −4 8 5
•  
• Phan, An
• Rating Change
  1915​±74 − 58 = 1857​±63
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +8
• 1709​±40
• Glassenbury, Paul
• 3 −7 3 9
• −65
• 1657​±45
• Langley, Dyson
• −10 −6 7 8 5
• −1
• 2197​±80
• Langley, Paul
• 10 8 7
•  
• Phung, Chris
• Rating Change
  1101​±80 + 131 = 1232​±86
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +65
• 1257​±67
• Hu, Eric
• −8 6 4 6
• +48
• 1223​±67
• Northeast, Tania
• 7 8 −8 9
• +18
• 1109​±73
• Fong, Yik Long
• 6 8 10
•  
• Pikula, Sandro
• Rating Change
  1652​±48 − 17 = 1635​±45
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 1526​±61
• Sharma, Manoj
• 7 7 −4 −8 5
• −25
• 1527​±47
• Truong, Jayden
• −4 6 13 7
• +1
• 1371​±96
• Du, Hai
• −8 7 8 −9 7
•  
• Pilavci, Omer
• Rating Change
  1079​±66 + 28 = 1107​±56
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +30
• 1137​±44
• Mitev, Thomas
• 5 6 8
• −20
• 1104​±61
• Tan, Ling
• 9 6 8
• +19
• 1136​±107
• Zulfic, Ismet
• 11 11 7
•  
• Puttikul, Natee
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 − 35 = 965​±131
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −26
• 1231​±51
• Pannewig, Honey
• −10 6 4 6
• −6
• 1327​±74
• Taylor, Lucjan
• 4 8 2
• −3
• 1440​±140
• Tomas, John Caesar II
• 5 5 7
•  
• Rabuan, Muadz
• Rating Change
  686​±99 + 84 = 770​±82
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +49
• 696​±66
• Wauchope, Peter
• 3 6 3
• +23
• 649​±55
• Willis, Aiden
• 4 6 11
• +12
• 602​±107
• Rosling, Lu
• 6 5 6
•  
• Roberts, Tony
• Rating Change
  1165​±80 − 41 = 1124​±62
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −26
• 1204​±63
• Teagle, Ken
• 6 6 −7 7
• −11
• 1265​±88
• Ciantar, Robert
• −9 7 14 8
• −3
• 1344​±35
• Farley, Craig
• 8 7 8
•  
• Rochow, Ian
• Rating Change
  1600​±82 + 8 = 1608​±65
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +21
• 1541​±53
• Tan, Kok Chong
• 7 −6 8 7
• −27
• 1648​±46
• Liang, David
• 1 3 9
• +14
• 1513​±64
• Kappellos, Harry
• 9 6 9
•  
• Rogers, Mitchell
• Rating Change
  1780​±35 + 2 = 1782​±33
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 1825​±49
• Lee, Isaiah
• 8 8 4
• −6
• 1736​±158
• Ngu, Ing Hung Stephy
• 8 −7 7 −6 5
• −2
• 1935​±121
• Wang, Stephen
• 2 −5 9 12
•  
• Rosling, Lu
• Rating Change
  752​±143 − 144 = 608​±103
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −90
• 732​±67
• Ebero, Charmae
• 2 2 3
• −33
• 776​±85
• Rabuan, Muadz
• 6 5 6
• −21
• 786​±75
• Adams, Mike
• −9 6 3 0
•  
• Ruanglertboon, Warit Will
• Rating Change
  1724​±93 + 21 = 1745​±87
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +17
• 1590​±73
• Lu, Jason
• −7 9 5 −8 8
• +3
• 1458​±60
• Wang, Yanhan Dennis
• −9 6 −12 7 9
• +1
• 1334​±73
• Fan, Tian Zhang
• 2 −7 3 −9 6
•  
• Salvagno, Riccardo
• Rating Change
  1500​±61 + 28 = 1528​±55
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +37
• 1662​±54
• Laan, Nicholas
• −9 9 11 −9 7
• −8
• 1636​±46
• Joshi, Ankit
• −7 11 7 9
• −2
• 1747​±31
• Abdilla, George
• 4 8 7
•  
• Sefin, Ahmed
• Rating Change
  1100​±74 + 45 = 1145​±70
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +53
• 1263​±54
• Pannewig, Honey
• 9 9 6
• −6
• 1326​±75
• Taylor, Lucjan
• 4 11 8
• −2
• 1437​±142
• Tomas, John Caesar II
• −11 5 6 6
•  
• Sharma, Manoj
• Rating Change
  1554​±73 − 40 = 1514​±58
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −28
• 1561​±41
• Weaver, Richard
• −9 12 6 −6 10
• −11
• 1628​±47
• Pikula, Sandro
• 7 7 −4 −8 5
• −2
• 1760​±46
• Malyschko, Kevin
• 2 −3 9 8
•  
• Smiech, Alex
• Rating Change
  1285​±48 + 9 = 1294​±44
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +24
• 1454​±72
• Ferro, Tony
• 10 7 −9 7
• −9
• 1342​±68
• Lowe, David
• 3 −10 6 12
• −5
• 1401​±60
• Le, Su
• −8 −8 8 8 7
•  
• Stevels, Lenno
• Rating Change
  1568​±53 − 18 = 1550​±45
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +11
• 1518​±65
• Kappellos, Harry
• 6 5 −8 8
• −22
• 1508​±52
• Tan, Kok Chong
• −4 5 10 8
• −7
• 1649​±46
• Liang, David
• −8 5 11 8
•  
• Stevels, Mathijs
• Rating Change
  1199​±75 + 32 = 1231​±64
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +53
• 1383​±47
• Coombes, Julie
• 5 −10 6 7
• −19
• 1273​±73
• Mitchell, Phil
• 3 7 6
• −2
• 1453​±63
• Coxon, Andy
• 5 6 9
•  
• Surman, Theresa
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 − 52 = 948​±90
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +124
• 1114​±74
• Vernik, Kamilo
• 4 −8 11 −3 8
• −158
• 819​±71
• Vuong, Tuan
• −6 −5 8 10 9
• −18
• 1043​±68
• Camillo, John
• 7 8 10
•  
• Swanson, Alex
• Rating Change
  1930​±85 − 16 = 1914​±65
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +14
• 1788​±35
• Walker, Trevor
• 3 9 −4 8
• −39
• 1918​±54
• Pandit, Sharad
• 4 8 10
• +9
• 1771​±73
• Golobokov, Pavel
• 6 5 5
•  
• Tan, Kok Chong
• Rating Change
  1507​±56 + 21 = 1528​±49
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +25
• 1568​±48
• Stevels, Lenno
• −4 5 10 8
• −11
• 1589​±66
• Rochow, Ian
• 7 −6 8 7
• +7
• 1416​±65
• Dawe, Andrew
• 8 −9 −5 3 5
•  
• Tan, Ling
• Rating Change
  1172​±79 − 44 = 1128​±57
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +24
• 1133​±72
• Pilavci, Omer
• 9 6 8
• −53
• 1060​±37
• Le-Tran, Huy
• 9 6 10
• −14
• 1199​±64
• Hartnett, Dennis
• 4 4 9
•  
• Taneja, Pranjay
• Rating Change
  784​±74 + 66 = 850​±76
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +36
• 837​±82
• Nguyen, Cindy
• 4 8 −10 −8 8
• +23
• 803​±100
• Vo, Huyen
• 6 −3 9 10
• +7
• 672​±47
• Du, Nathan
• 7 8 −12 9
•  
• Taylor, Lucjan
• Rating Change
  1294​±73 + 39 = 1333​±75
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +31
• 1307​±60
• Hagel, Scott
• 8 −7 1 −11 8
• +7
• 1152​±76
• Sefin, Ahmed
• 4 11 8
• +2
• 969​±135
• Puttikul, Natee
• 4 8 2
•  
• Teagle, Ken
• Rating Change
  1182​±74 + 24 = 1206​±58
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +38
• 1254​±43
• McCloughry, David
• −8 10 8 7
• −27
• 1190​±63
• Andreoni, Eric
• 10 −9 7 10
• +13
• 1129​±65
• Roberts, Tony
• 6 6 −7 7
•  
• Thomas, Cam
• Rating Change
  810​±57 − 4 = 806​±49
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +13
• 799​±102
• Vo, Huyen
• 10 7 12
• −22
• 764​±69
• Nguyen, Cindy
• 7 9 4
• +5
• 671​±47
• Du, Nathan
• 9 8 9
•  
• Thomas, Max
• Rating Change
  905​±60 + 4 = 909​±48
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +17
• 899​±69
• Tran, Duy
• 10 8 7
• −28
• 831​±57
• Nguyen, William
• 5 6 6
• +8
• 811​±58
• Franklin, Owen
• 11 8 4
• −1
• 1186​±86
• Grounds, Roger
• 4 4 3
• +5
• 775​±65
• Grounds, William
• 8 7 6
• +1
• 664​±45
• Du, Daniel
• 5 5 4
•  
• To, Tuan Minh
• Rating Change
  1397​±65 + 14 = 1411​±54
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +18
• 1359​±63
• Langhans, Geoffrey
• 9 4 −8 8
• −16
• 1454​±64
• Grant, Paul
• −8 −7 5 6 8
• +12
• 1339​±61
• Maddigan, Damien
• −9 −6 11 11 8
•  
• Tomas, John Caesar II
• Rating Change
  1327​±179 + 120 = 1447​±137
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +104
• 1297​±57
• Hagel, Scott
• 10 5 9
• +14
• 1148​±72
• Sefin, Ahmed
• −11 5 6 6
• +3
• 971​±133
• Puttikul, Natee
• 5 5 7
•  
• Tomaselli, Rodney
• Rating Change
  1295​±77 + 11 = 1306​±60
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +45
• 1452​±73
• Le, Su
• 5 3 −3 −9 9
• −23
• 1342​±67
• Lowe, David
• 11 9 −8 4
• −10
• 1396​±59
• Ferro, Tony
• 5 4 5
•  
• Tran, Duy
• Rating Change
  952​±84 − 79 = 873​±62
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −52
• 860​±56
• Lau, Ivan
• 3 3 5
• −28
• 895​±49
• Thomas, Max
• 10 8 7
•  
• Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
• Rating Change
  1723​±71 + 55 = 1778​±69
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +35
• 1755​±32
• Abdilla, George
• 8 7 6
• +12
• 1649​±49
• Joshi, Ankit
• 10 15 6
• +9
• 1640​±53
• Laan, Nicholas
• 6 9 3
•  
• Truong, Jayden
• Rating Change
  1508​±48 + 45 = 1553​±49
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +27
• 1660​±47
• Pikula, Sandro
• −4 6 13 7
• −1
• 1761​±46
• Malyschko, Kevin
• 9 9 −12 10
• +19
• 1586​±42
• Weaver, Richard
• −6 −9 8 8 9
•  
• Tun, Jason
• Rating Change
  1099​±78 + 8 = 1107​±67
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 998​±62
• Chen, Michael
• 9 5 5
• −12
• 1258​±75
• Hayter, Steve
• −10 3 4 8
• +4
• 884​±85
• Zhang, Peter
• 6 7 9
•  
• Vanderklugt, Alex
• Rating Change
  1817​±77 − 74 = 1743​±58
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −44
• 1727​±63
• Golobokov, Pavel
• 9 10 −9 6
• −25
• 1777​±35
• Walker, Trevor
• 4 11 9
• −5
• 1927​±54
• Pandit, Sharad
• 9 6 8
•  
• Vernik, Kamilo
• Rating Change
  1079​±76 + 3 = 1082​±60
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +30
• 1137​±114
• Ladduwahetty, Tharin
• 9 4 16
• −51
• 842​±112
• Surman, Theresa
• 4 −8 11 −3 8
• +24
• 1085​±79
• Bohdan, Victor
• 9 10 5
•  
• Verrusio, Adrian
• Rating Change
  1444​±59 + 20 = 1464​±52
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +32
• 1560​±54
• Oduyemi, Razaq
• −6 8 −7 5 8
• −17
• 1464​±68
• Harrison, Keegan
• 9 −3 8 −9 8
• +6
• 1303​±153
• Aufiero, Stefan
• 10 19 −4 2
•  
• Vishwachandra, Chamal
• Rating Change
  1203​±78 + 7 = 1210​±60
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +38
• 1244​±68
• Hu, Eric
• 6 9 7
• −56
• 1040​±65
• Fong, Yik Long
• 7 7 9
• +25
• 1210​±68
• Northeast, Tania
• 6 −8 8 −10 6
•  
• Vishwachandra, Mihiri
• Rating Change
  740​±73 + 23 = 763​±63
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +38
• 824​±56
• Woodcock, Thomas
• −6 −7 4 5 10
• −15
• 840​±76
• Hampel, Bailey
• −5 6 8 7
•  
• Vo, Huyen
• Rating Change
  800​±150 − 75 = 725​±89
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +54
• 691​±90
• Kohler, Celine
• 6 2 3
• −94
• 794​±50
• Thomas, Cam
• 10 7 12
• −35
• 815​±72
• Taneja, Pranjay
• 6 −3 9 10
•  
• Vuong, Tuan
• Rating Change
  838​±80 + 40 = 878​±72
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +54
• 1057​±100
• Surman, Theresa
• −6 −5 8 10 9
• −8
• 1050​±66
• Bohdan, Victor
• 7 −5 −3 3 11
• −6
• 1054​±99
• Ladduwahetty, Tharin
• 5 6 9
•  
• Walker, Trevor
• Rating Change
  1776​±36 + 7 = 1783​±34
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +7
• 1763​±63
• Vanderklugt, Alex
• 4 11 9
• −3
• 1896​±69
• Swanson, Alex
• 3 9 −4 8
• +3
• 1666​±53
• Zhang, Michael
• 11 6 −4 10
•  
• Walsh, Dennis
• Rating Change
  1298​±59 − 30 = 1268​±50
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +11
• 1205​±64
• Ng, Sheldon
• −5 4 5 −7 5
• −26
• 1215​±84
• Cheong, Eagan
• 12 9 −5 8
• −15
• 1293​±81
• Jin, Ming
• 4 10 6
•  
• Wang, Stephen
• Rating Change
  1800​±200 + 159 = 1959​±108
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +157
• 1871​±59
• Liang, Keyman
• 8 −9 8 10
• −29
• 2132​±80
• Houston, Scott A
• 7 3 9
• +31
• 1787​±34
• Rogers, Mitchell
• 2 −5 9 12
•  
• Wang, Yanhan Dennis
• Rating Change
  1496​±73 − 42 = 1454​±58
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −30
• 1490​±40
• Milsom, Lucas
• −9 8 −11 9 2
• −10
• 1576​±46
• McDougall, Gary
• 11 −6 6 −9 12
• −2
• 1736​±89
• Ruanglertboon, Warit Will
• −9 6 −12 7 9
•  
• Wauchope, Peter
• Rating Change
  775​±86 − 83 = 692​±63
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −45
• 721​±68
• Ebero, Charmae
• 2 3 0
• −22
• 765​±87
• Rabuan, Muadz
• 3 6 3
• −16
• 779​±76
• Adams, Mike
• 1 4 3
•  
• Waugh, Lionel
• Rating Change
  1158​±75 − 4 = 1154​±58
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +16
• 1075​±63
• Lee, Andrew
• −5 9 −5 5 12
• −33
• 1128​±62
• Bu, Bruce
• −9 11 9 8
• +13
• 1073​±74
• Day, Peter
• 7 −3 9 10
•  
• Weaver, Richard
• Rating Change
  1575​±43 − 4 = 1571​±40
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 1535​±63
• Sharma, Manoj
• −9 12 6 −6 10
• −15
• 1533​±48
• Truong, Jayden
• −6 −9 8 8 9
• +2
• 1377​±98
• Du, Hai
• −5 6 4 −6 6
•  
• Willis, Aiden
• Rating Change
  681​±60 − 29 = 652​±54
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −14
• 733​±69
• Ebero, Charmae
• 6 4 3
• −8
• 781​±89
• Rabuan, Muadz
• 4 6 11
• −7
• 792​±78
• Adams, Mike
• 7 2 0
•  
• Willis, Tyler
• Rating Change
  789​±69 − 20 = 769​±64
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −11
• 916​±72
• Chen, Oscar
• 13 7 9
• −9
• 921​±79
• Li, Glen
• 8 −8 12 9
• −1
• 1105​±107
• Gerges, Youssef
• 5 6 −10 9
•  
• Woodcock, Thomas
• Rating Change
  794​±58 − 2 = 792​±50
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +16
• 769​±70
• Cunningham, Alex
• 5 −9 8 11
• −27
• 719​±64
• Vishwachandra, Mihiri
• −6 −7 4 5 10
• +8
• 709​±121
• Ghulami, Mustafa
• 6 6 4
•  
• Young, Tracey
• Rating Change
  1000​±150 − 124 = 876​±113
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −87
• 949​±151
• Luong, Thinh
• 3 6 −12 13
• −23
• 1118​±76
• Dang, Kevin
• 2 4 7
• −14
• 1123​±74
• Hoang, Hung
• 7 4 9
•  
• Zhang, Michael
• Rating Change
  1683​±57 − 21 = 1662​±51
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −13
• 1744​±66
• Golobokov, Pavel
• −10 5 7 11
• −7
• 1783​±35
• Walker, Trevor
• 11 6 −4 10
• −1
• 1933​±54
• Pandit, Sharad
• 8 5 7
•  
• Zhang, Peter
• Rating Change
  810​±77 + 68 = 878​±80
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +74
• 1090​±72
• Parenti, Stefan
• 9 −7 −4 6 9
• −3
• 1104​±67
• Tun, Jason
• 6 7 9
• −2
• 1113​±67
• Palaniappan, Arjun
• 10 4 9
•  
• Zulfic, Ismet
• Rating Change
  1200​±200 − 115 = 1085​±90
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +136
• 1235​±71
• Hartnett, Dennis
• 7 5 −4 −8 12
• −203
• 1066​±37
• Le-Tran, Huy
• 7 4 7
• −48
• 1096​±58
• Pilavci, Omer
• 11 11 7

• Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
• Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment

Players: 189. Matches: 285. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bungey, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 29489. Submitted: 2018-06-11 9:50 pm EDT. Revised: 2021-01-01 3:46 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-04-28 11:40 pm EDT.