TTSA Winter Pennant 2018 Week 5
2018-06-04
Detailed Report
- Abdilla, George
- Rating Change
1738±33 + 10 = 1748±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1726±49
- Joshi, Ankit
- −10 7 6 −10 15
- 0
- 2158±66
- Langley, Paul
- 10 6 2
- +3
- 1658±39
- Langley, Dyson
- 6 9 6
- Agocs, Eszter
- Rating Change
1327±78 − 56 = 1271±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −30
- 1343±45
- Maddigan, Damien
- 9 6 2
- −19
- 1345±40
- Langhans, Geoff
- 6 −6 4 3
- −7
- 1417±42
- Grant, Paul
- 7 3 7
- Ahrens, Matthew
- Rating Change
1261±55 − 40 = 1221±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −30
- 1140±62
- Nguyen, Jennifer
- 6 −5 10 8
- −5
- 1376±41
- Nguyen, Sinh
- 9 8 7
- −4
- 1381±44
- To, Tuan
- 9 5 5
- Akhurst, Matthew
- Rating Change
1399±69 − 48 = 1351±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1188±75
- Nguyen, Jennifer
- 9 9 9
- −32
- 1368±42
- Nguyen, Sinh
- 8 −5 5 2
- −21
- 1373±44
- To, Tuan
- 8 −9 −8 3 10
- Akonor, Solomon
- Rating Change
1809±56 − 29 = 1780±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −25
- 1762±33
- Rogers, Mitchell
- 10 8 −7 9
- −3
- 1980±56
- Liang, Keyman
- 4 −5 9 9
- −2
- 2020±50
- Houston, Scott Anthony
- 5 6 6
- Allington, Len
- Rating Change
975±78 − 33 = 942±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 796±58
- Jain, Isha
- 5 −5 7 −8 8
- −47
- 891±51
- Jain, Akash
- −10 8 7 −8 8
- +5
- 748±48
- Vishwachandra, Mihiri
- 3 −8 6 7
- Au-Duong, Terence
- Rating Change
1252±43 + 14 = 1266±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1180±45
- Mitev, Thomas
- −9 10 3 −7 9
- +4
- 1140±38
- Darwent, Dawn
- −7 7 8 5
- +3
- 1125±47
- Chan, Allen
- 6 8 −8 3
- Aufiero, Stefan
- Rating Change
1482±51 + 35 = 1517±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1585±39
- Malyschko, David
- 9 7 4
- +8
- 1423±42
- Ferro, Tony
- −9 2 −2 9 9
- Baker, Lorraine
- Rating Change
1368±38 + 5 = 1373±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1246±46
- Hu, Eric
- 5 7 −7 5
- +1
- 1164±49
- Northeast, Tania
- 4 6 6
- +1
- 1098±66
- Fong, Yik Long
- 5 7 2
- Bates, Stephen
- Rating Change
1606±40 + 18 = 1624±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1627±48
- Rochow, Ian
- 6 2 4
- +6
- 1552±34
- Stevels, Lenno
- 9 5 5
- 0
- 1334±52
- Dawe, Andrew
- −9 4 −10 7 7
- Beames, Max
- Rating Change
766±45 − 11 = 755±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 701±69
- Low, Lewis
- 3 9 4
- −13
- 757±53
- Cunningham, Alex
- 3 −8 9 5
- −6
- 835±54
- Ghulami, Mustafa
- 5 6 −4 3
- Bellido, Sebastian
- Rating Change
1128±34 − 24 = 1104±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1051±49
- Peters, Shane
- 8 −9 10 6
- −7
- 1094±45
- Waugh, Lionel
- 4 −5 5 4
- −6
- 1118±43
- Hughes, Oliver
- −4 9 8 6
- Bonner, Bev
- Rating Change
886±73 − 45 = 841±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −26
- 901±50
- Vuong, Tuan
- −6 −6 9 4 8
- −13
- 941±51
- Marchesan, Anthony
- 8 6 7
- −5
- 1014±58
- Camillo, John
- 4 8 9
- Box, David
- Rating Change
1129±113 − 63 = 1066±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +40
- 1046±57
- Zuific, Ismet
- −7 6 10 7
- −83
- 1035±59
- Logvinski, Anatoli
- 2 6 8
- −20
- 1166±40
- Mitev, Thomas
- −7 −8 5 4 4
- Brandt, Menno
- Rating Change
764±58 − 27 = 737±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 702±56
- Brougham, Eileen
- 5 −7 6 3
- −28
- 682±64
- Cook, Peter
- 3 −12 −8 10 6
- −13
- 783±49
- Willis, Tyler
- 5 9 −6 12
- Brandt, Renier
- Rating Change
622±76 + 20 = 642±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +48
- 749±60
- Cook, Peter
- 10 −10 −2 3 8
- −22
- 678±56
- Brougham, Eileen
- −5 11 7 5
- −6
- 792±48
- Willis, Tyler
- 3 8 10
- Brougham, Eileen
- Rating Change
696±61 − 5 = 691±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 658±64
- Brandt, Renier
- −5 11 7 5
- −17
- 729±52
- Brandt, Menno
- 5 −7 6 3
- −4
- 864±49
- Curle, Michael
- 6 7 −7 6
- Bungey, Greg
- Rating Change
1353±41 − 15 = 1338±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1164±49
- Northeast, Tania
- 9 8 11
- −19
- 1217±47
- Hu, Eric
- 10 −8 9 8
- +1
- 1099±66
- Fong, Yik Long
- 5 8 3
- Burrows, Alana
- Rating Change
964±49 + 30 = 994±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 955±45
- Roder, Lenore
- 9 9 6
- +11
- 941±50
- Davies, Owen
- 4 5 −4 7
- +5
- 865±39
- Crowden, Caleb
- 4 −9 8 6
- Calipari, Matthew
- Rating Change
1538±142 − 223 = 1315±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1172±47
- Pilavci, Omer
- 7 5 6
- −177
- 1193±46
- Hussaini, Yasir
- 5 −9 8 −6 10
- −58
- 1292±47
- Hagel, Scott
- 10 2 9
- Camillo, John
- Rating Change
1053±63 − 30 = 1023±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 850±60
- Bonner, Bev
- 4 8 9
- −38
- 923±63
- Dong, Donny
- −9 8 8 −10 8
- +3
- 778±90
- Chen, Edward
- 7 9 4
- Campbell, Brooke
- Rating Change
856±47 − 1 = 855±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 871±40
- Crowden, Caleb
- 9 9 9
- −9
- 921±42
- Davies, Owen
- 8 7 8
- −6
- 936±44
- Roder, Lenore
- 9 −8 10 −11 6
- Chan, Allen
- Rating Change
1147±49 − 29 = 1118±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −24
- 1035±61
- Nguyen, Thoi
- 5 10 3
- −4
- 1261±42
- Au-Duong, Terence
- 6 8 −8 3
- −1
- 1372±58
- Le, Triet
- 5 −10 1 5
- Chan, Michelle
- Rating Change
1506±46 + 11 = 1517±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1400±54
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- −9 6 9 8
- +4
- 1373±50
- Phung, Chris
- 8 9 −9 7
- +2
- 1335±38
- Smiech, Alex
- 5 7 −10 3
- Chandrasena, Samadhi
- Rating Change
1049±45 − 6 = 1043±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1196±38
- McCloughry, David
- 6 −7 11 8
- −2
- 1230±60
- Roberts, Tony
- 9 −6 11 3
- 0
- 1343±58
- Cook, Steve
- 7 7 8
- Chapman, Andrew
- Rating Change
934±59 − 41 = 893±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 641±43
- Du, Daniel
- 4 9 8
- −27
- 877±49
- Tran, Duy
- −11 5 8 9
- −15
- 925±44
- Nguyen, William
- 6 5 −6 3
- Chen, Edward
- Rating Change
815±97 − 46 = 769±88 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −26
- 906±49
- Vuong, Tuan
- 6 5 7
- −14
- 945±50
- Marchesan, Anthony
- −5 8 9 2
- −5
- 1017±57
- Camillo, John
- 7 9 4
- Chen, Oscar
- Rating Change
965±67 + 3 = 968±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 641±98
- Plant, Tom
- −9 6 7 9
- +1
- 636±76
- Rosling, Lu
- 1 5 2
- Cheung, Natalie
- Rating Change
1292±50 + 11 = 1303±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1261±40
- Taylor, Lucjan
- 7 2 6
- −6
- 1422±62
- Tomas, John
- 7 6 2
- +5
- 1175±38
- Pannewig, Honey
- −6 7 7 7
- Cook, Peter
- Rating Change
730±70 − 17 = 713±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +35
- 759±52
- Brandt, Menno
- 3 −12 −8 10 6
- −46
- 596±71
- Brandt, Renier
- 10 −10 −2 3 8
- −6
- 862±49
- Curle, Michael
- 5 7 −9 9
- Cook, Steve
- Rating Change
1339±59 + 4 = 1343±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1146±39
- Fung, Jasmine
- 4 −6 4 9
- +1
- 1042±42
- Chandrasena, Samadhi
- 7 7 8
- Coombes, Julie
- Rating Change
1362±40 − 7 = 1355±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1441±46
- Grant, Paul
- −12 5 −7 11 7
- −12
- 1338±46
- Maddigan, Damien
- 10 6 −10 5
- −10
- 1341±41
- Langhans, Geoff
- 5 8 −5 9
- Costabile, Maurizio
- Rating Change
1336±55 − 30 = 1306±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1174±37
- Pannewig, Honey
- 2 9 5
- −29
- 1237±40
- Taylor, Lucjan
- −6 8 3 9
- −7
- 1418±62
- Tomas, John
- −9 9 −8 9 6
- Coxon, Andy
- Rating Change
1511±57 − 20 = 1491±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1357±45
- Maddigan, Damien
- 2 8 9
- −30
- 1405±42
- Grant, Paul
- −6 −8 9 3 12
- +5
- 1356±41
- Langhans, Geoff
- −6 9 13 9
- Crowden, Caleb
- Rating Change
872±42 − 12 = 860±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 754±51
- Yunos, Naguib
- 9 −9 8 12
- −13
- 842±43
- Campbell, Brooke
- 9 9 9
- −3
- 987±51
- Burrows, Alana
- 4 −9 8 6
- Cunningham, Alex
- Rating Change
768±57 + 7 = 775±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 765±42
- Beames, Max
- 3 −8 9 5
- −7
- 902±44
- Lau, Ivan
- 5 −11 7 9
- −4
- 926±41
- Thomas, Max
- 7 7 7
- Curle, Michael
- Rating Change
848±52 + 20 = 868±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 807±50
- Willis, Tyler
- −7 7 8 11
- +5
- 724±60
- Cook, Peter
- 5 7 −9 9
- +3
- 695±55
- Brougham, Eileen
- 6 7 −7 6
- Dang, Kevin
- Rating Change
1221±80 − 27 = 1194±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 858±57
- Zhang, Peter
- 5 8 6
- −27
- 1258±60
- Hayter, Steve
- 3 8 7
- 0
- 682±168
- Ellis, Daniel
- 5 7 7
- Darwent, Dawn
- Rating Change
1136±40 + 2 = 1138±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1084±58
- Nguyen, Thoi
- 12 12 5
- −3
- 1262±42
- Au-Duong, Terence
- −7 7 8 5
- −1
- 1372±58
- Le, Triet
- 8 −9 8 7
- Davies, Owen
- Rating Change
930±49 + 0 = 930±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 864±44
- Campbell, Brooke
- 8 7 8
- −10
- 983±50
- Burrows, Alana
- 4 5 −4 7
- +2
- 751±51
- Yunos, Naguib
- 6 9 3
- Dawe, Andrew
- Rating Change
1343±54 − 8 = 1335±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1463±37
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 3 6 3
- −1
- 1587±41
- Neubauer, Ken
- 4 4 6
- −1
- 1624±40
- Bates, Stephen
- −9 4 −10 7 7
- Day, Peter
- Rating Change
1112±50 − 49 = 1063±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −24
- 999±65
- Zuific, Ismet
- 8 13 7
- −18
- 1027±60
- Logvinski, Anatoli
- −5 8 8 2
- −6
- 1165±40
- Mitev, Thomas
- 9 −8 4 10
- Do, Dylan
- Rating Change
716±116 + 112 = 828±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +85
- 800±47
- Franklin, Owen
- 4 −9 14 9
- −2
- 1101±59
- Grounds, Roger
- −8 6 6 2
- +29
- 748±52
- Grounds, William
- 8 7 6
- Dong, Donny
- Rating Change
815±97 + 152 = 967±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +91
- 1062±61
- Camillo, John
- −9 8 8 −10 8
- +40
- 977±52
- Marchesan, Anthony
- 4 −4 3 −8 6
- +21
- 936±52
- Vuong, Tuan
- 10 10 −8 −5 11
- Du, Daniel
- Rating Change
643±44 − 3 = 640±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 826±53
- Golobokov, Vanya
- 7 4 4
- −1
- 893±50
- Chapman, Andrew
- 4 9 8
- 0
- 944±50
- Gong, Charlie
- 3 1 5
- Du, Nathan
- Rating Change
635±45 − 5 = 630±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 826±44
- Woodcock, Thomas
- −11 −10 9 2 1
- −2
- 849±47
- Hampel, Bailey
- 5 13 9
- −1
- 866±53
- Foundas, George
- 2 0 6
- Du, Phat
- Rating Change
1560±45 + 7 = 1567±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1594±45
- Ruanglertboon, Will
- −9 9 8 9
- −18
- 1495±36
- Milsom, Lucas
- 6 −7 −5 9 10
- +10
- 1548±35
- McDougall, Gary
- −10 5 7 8
- Du, Sally
- Rating Change
1363±39 − 5 = 1358±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 1505±36
- Milsom, Lucas
- 8 8 12
- −2
- 1540±34
- McDougall, Gary
- −5 9 7 5
- −1
- 1577±43
- Ruanglertboon, Will
- 6 7 7
- Duong, Tung
- Rating Change
755±64 + 2 = 757±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 749±53
- Grounds, William
- −5 6 9 −9 9
- −21
- 773±48
- Franklin, Owen
- 8 8 2
- 0
- 1101±59
- Grounds, Roger
- 3 2 9
- Ellis, Daniel
- Rating Change
719±180 − 36 = 683±168 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −30
- 962±55
- Luong, Trung
- 3 8 4
- −5
- 1094±47
- Hoang, Hung
- 6 7 −7 6
- −1
- 1193±63
- Dang, Kevin
- 5 7 7
- Ey, Jamie
- Rating Change
1636±73 + 32 = 1668±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1551±39
- Truong, Jayden
- 7 5 6
- +11
- 1538±48
- Sharma, Manoj Kumar
- 6 −9 −4 4 4
- +3
- 1447±35
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 7 3 6
- Fan, Tian
- Rating Change
1378±55 + 17 = 1395±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +28
- 1489±51
- Kappellos, Harry
- 7 −6 10 −3 3
- −11
- 1447±40
- Tan, Kok Chong
- 6 9 11
- 0
- 1715±46
- Liang, David
- 8 2 10
- Farley, Craig
- Rating Change
1329±38 + 9 = 1338±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1262±37
- Lawrie, Daniel
- 3 8 5
- +3
- 1195±40
- Jones, Stephen
- −10 5 7 1
- +1
- 1128±33
- Lawrie, Lynda
- 8 2 6
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- Rating Change
1666±63 − 27 = 1639±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1550±39
- Truong, Jayden
- 6 5 3
- −39
- 1506±48
- Sharma, Manoj Kumar
- 6 10 10
- +2
- 1447±35
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 2 −7 6 −9 5
- Ferro, Tony
- Rating Change
1440±46 − 24 = 1416±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1454±42
- Harrison, Keegan
- 7 2 8
- −6
- 1508±51
- Aufiero, Stefan
- −9 2 −2 9 9
- −5
- 1523±40
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- 4 4 −11 7
- Flynn, Mark
- Rating Change
923±93 − 15 = 908±70 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +42
- 901±58
- Gallage, Kevin
- 8 9 5
- −44
- 917±63
- Surman, Theresa
- −8 6 5 12
- −12
- 1039±66
- Ladduwahetty, Matthew
- −4 4 8 10
- Fong, Yik Long
- Rating Change
1105±71 − 9 = 1096±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1338±39
- Bungey, Greg
- 5 8 3
- −3
- 1349±40
- Kracht, Jurgen
- 9 4 −8 6
- −2
- 1372±37
- Baker, Lorraine
- 5 7 2
- Foundas, George
- Rating Change
838±55 + 25 = 863±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 844±41
- Nguyen, Cindy
- 11 7 6
- +4
- 681±74
- Pham, Long
- 7 4 8
- +2
- 630±44
- Du, Nathan
- 2 0 6
- Franklin, Owen
- Rating Change
793±51 − 2 = 791±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 780±57
- Duong, Tung
- 8 8 2
- −14
- 790±88
- Do, Dylan
- 4 −9 14 9
- −3
- 960±48
- Le, Tuan Quang
- 6 6 6
- Freegard, Anthony
- Rating Change
1165±51 + 9 = 1174±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1064±68
- Ladduwahetty, Matthew
- −11 8 6 9
- +2
- 940±60
- Surman, Theresa
- 9 5 6
- +1
- 887±57
- Gallage, Kevin
- 7 7 −5 10
- Fung, Jasmine
- Rating Change
1162±41 − 17 = 1145±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1191±38
- McCloughry, David
- 6 5 5
- −6
- 1220±60
- Roberts, Tony
- −3 4 5 7
- −2
- 1340±58
- Cook, Steve
- 4 −6 4 9
- Gallage, Kevin
- Rating Change
914±62 − 34 = 880±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −25
- 868±83
- Flynn, Mark
- 8 9 5
- −8
- 1009±42
- Shaughnessy, Kelly
- 3 6 −7 7
- −1
- 1171±52
- Freegard, Anthony
- 7 7 −5 10
- Gerges, Youseff
- Rating Change
973±64 + 2 = 975±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 641±98
- Plant, Tom
- 7 5 8
- +1
- 636±76
- Rosling, Lu
- 6 8 6
- Ghulami, Mustafa
- Rating Change
813±60 + 34 = 847±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +35
- 949±45
- Thomas, Max
- 11 5 −9 7
- −12
- 900±44
- Lau, Ivan
- 5 8 9
- +10
- 762±41
- Beames, Max
- 5 6 −4 3
- Gliessert, Joel
- Rating Change
1449±49 + 22 = 1471±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1576±37
- Weaver, Richard
- −9 9 10 −9 10
- −3
- 1638±39
- Pikula, Sandro
- 5 5 −7 −7 6
- −1
- 1744±39
- Malyschko, Kevin
- −14 4 7 6
- Goh, Royce
- Rating Change
1659±53 + 3 = 1662±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1393±51
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- 0 7 7
- +1
- 1369±48
- Phung, Chris
- 5 −10 6 5
- 0
- 1333±37
- Smiech, Alex
- −10 −9 10 3 5
- Golobokov, Vanya
- Rating Change
852±59 − 23 = 829±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 642±43
- Du, Daniel
- 7 4 4
- −17
- 885±49
- Tran, Duy
- 9 −11 13 9
- −9
- 931±44
- Nguyen, William
- 3 5 6
- Gong, Charlie
- Rating Change
916±52 + 34 = 950±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 955±48
- Nguyen, William
- 6 −8 8 8
- +13
- 911±52
- Tran, Duy
- 4 6 13
- +1
- 641±43
- Du, Daniel
- 3 1 5
- Grant, Paul
- Rating Change
1416±45 + 4 = 1420±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1518±55
- Coxon, Andy
- −6 −8 9 3 12
- −19
- 1340±37
- Coombes, Julie
- −12 5 −7 11 7
- +3
- 1275±61
- Agocs, Eszter
- 7 3 7
- Grounds, Roger
- Rating Change
1153±68 − 50 = 1103±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 833±76
- Do, Dylan
- −8 6 6 2
- −53
- 937±44
- Le, Tuan Quang
- −4 7 −12 10 6
- +1
- 762±55
- Duong, Tung
- 3 2 9
- Grounds, William
- Rating Change
770±55 − 33 = 737±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −21
- 737±62
- Duong, Tung
- −5 6 9 −9 9
- −11
- 797±87
- Do, Dylan
- 8 7 6
- −2
- 960±48
- Le, Tuan Quang
- 1 4 3
- Hagel, Scott
- Rating Change
1318±52 − 14 = 1304±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1366±90
- Calipari, Matthew
- 10 2 9
- −21
- 1271±45
- Norton, Frances
- 8 9 8
- −9
- 1356±50
- Phung, Chris
- 7 7 10
- Hampel, Bailey
- Rating Change
825±49 + 22 = 847±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 846±41
- Nguyen, Cindy
- −5 5 8 10
- +4
- 683±74
- Pham, Long
- 4 6 2
- +2
- 630±44
- Du, Nathan
- 5 13 9
- Harrison, Keegan
- Rating Change
1459±44 + 4 = 1463±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1425±42
- Ferro, Tony
- 7 2 8
- −5
- 1566±38
- Malyschko, David
- 15 10 −9 −8 12
- Hayter, Steve
- Rating Change
1251±61 + 22 = 1273±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1222±80
- Dang, Kevin
- 3 8 7
- +5
- 1099±48
- Hoang, Hung
- 9 7 −10 7
- +1
- 966±55
- Luong, Trung
- −5 7 3 −10 8
- Hoang, Hung
- Rating Change
1096±49 − 1 = 1095±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 860±58
- Zhang, Peter
- 7 6 12
- −4
- 1268±60
- Hayter, Steve
- 9 7 −10 7
- +1
- 685±169
- Ellis, Daniel
- 6 7 −7 6
- Houston, Scott Anthony
- Rating Change
2049±55 − 29 = 2020±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1782±50
- Akonor, Solomon
- 5 6 6
- −32
- 1915±44
- Pandit, Sharad
- 8 −7 9 −6 9
- +1
- 1776±32
- Walker, Trevor
- 8 7 −9 8
- Hu, Eric
- Rating Change
1227±50 + 15 = 1242±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 1356±40
- Bungey, Greg
- 10 −8 9 8
- −6
- 1347±40
- Kracht, Jurgen
- 8 9 4
- −4
- 1370±38
- Baker, Lorraine
- 5 7 −7 5
- Hua, Jordan
- Rating Change
1722±49 − 8 = 1714±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1548±39
- Truong, Jayden
- 11 8 9
- −11
- 1763±50
- Luong, Liem
- −12 −9 4 4 6
- 0
- 2095±61
- von Einem, Samuel
- 5 1 2
- Hughes, Oliver
- Rating Change
1103±45 + 26 = 1129±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1110±31
- Bellido, Sebastian
- −4 9 8 6
- +11
- 1108±37
- Langley, Cynthia
- 9 −10 4 7
- +1
- 857±79
- Knott, Peter
- 9 5 −5 12
- Hussaini, Yasir
- Rating Change
1171±48 + 47 = 1218±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1397±89
- Calipari, Matthew
- 5 −9 8 −6 10
- −2
- 1365±49
- Phung, Chris
- 7 −3 10 9
- +23
- 1311±48
- Norton, Frances
- 8 −7 8 −7 8
- Jain, Akash
- Rating Change
878±56 + 38 = 916±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 988±74
- Allington, Len
- −10 8 7 −8 8
- −6
- 1029±73
- Kirsten, Ernie
- 7 4 7
- +17
- 924±65
- Mitchelsen, Phil
- 8 7 8
- Jain, Isha
- Rating Change
810±60 − 22 = 788±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 882±60
- Mitchelsen, Phil
- −11 9 8 −4 7
- −7
- 932±64
- Allington, Len
- 5 −5 7 −8 8
- −2
- 1034±73
- Kirsten, Ernie
- 7 10 −9 8
- Jones, Stephen
- Rating Change
1196±43 − 4 = 1192±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1208±45
- Teagle, Ken
- −9 5 −9 5 5
- −14
- 1163±45
- Mills, Toby
- 2 −6 8 7
- −3
- 1336±38
- Farley, Craig
- −10 5 7 1
- Joshi, Ankit
- Rating Change
1700±45 + 14 = 1714±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1729±48
- Zhang, Michael
- 4 6 −6 4
- −10
- 1742±32
- Abdilla, George
- −10 7 6 −10 15
- +12
- 1722±51
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- 9 9 5
- Kappellos, Harry
- Rating Change
1462±56 + 2 = 1464±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1457±47
- Zhao, Mark
- 6 −4 −9 9 9
- −29
- 1367±53
- Fan, Tian
- 7 −6 10 −3 3
- +11
- 1404±47
- Wang, Dennis
- 10 7 10
- Kemp, Linda
- Rating Change
568±91 − 36 = 532±85 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −30
- 624±62
- Kohler, Celine
- −9 7 9 8
- −4
- 798±40
- Thomas, Cam
- 5 5 7
- −3
- 807±44
- Taneja, Pranjay
- 3 8 12
- Kirsten, Ernie
- Rating Change
1022±74 + 19 = 1041±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 920±52
- Jain, Akash
- 7 4 7
- +3
- 794±57
- Jain, Isha
- 7 10 −9 8
- +1
- 747±48
- Vishwachandra, Mihiri
- −9 3 6 2
- Knott, Peter
- Rating Change
875±85 − 16 = 859±79 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1071±50
- Peters, Shane
- 4 6 9
- −4
- 1108±43
- Waugh, Lionel
- 6 9 −6 10
- −3
- 1130±43
- Hughes, Oliver
- 9 5 −5 12
- Kohler, Celine
- Rating Change
589±72 + 47 = 636±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 639±70
- Mott, Andrew
- 9 14 −8 8
- +14
- 557±88
- Kemp, Linda
- −9 7 9 8
- Kracht, Jurgen
- Rating Change
1343±41 + 8 = 1351±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1248±46
- Hu, Eric
- 8 9 4
- +2
- 1165±49
- Northeast, Tania
- −6 6 6 9
- +1
- 1099±66
- Fong, Yik Long
- 9 4 −8 6
- Ladduwahetty, Matthew
- Rating Change
1019±79 + 34 = 1053±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1024±43
- Shaughnessy, Kelly
- 9 9 9
- −12
- 1168±51
- Freegard, Anthony
- −11 8 6 9
- +11
- 927±73
- Flynn, Mark
- −4 4 8 10
- Langhans, Geoff
- Rating Change
1334±43 + 17 = 1351±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1363±37
- Coombes, Julie
- 5 8 −5 9
- −3
- 1486±49
- Coxon, Andy
- −6 9 13 9
- +6
- 1285±63
- Agocs, Eszter
- 6 −6 4 3
- Langley, Cynthia
- Rating Change
1114±39 − 11 = 1103±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1124±46
- Waugh, Lionel
- 3 −10 6 −11 7
- −13
- 1053±49
- Peters, Shane
- 19 5 6
- −8
- 1120±43
- Hughes, Oliver
- 9 −10 4 7
- Langley, Dyson
- Rating Change
1673±41 − 22 = 1651±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1688±52
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- 7 −9 9 9
- −8
- 1703±44
- Zhang, Michael
- 6 −13 7 −6 10
- −5
- 1743±33
- Abdilla, George
- 6 9 6
- Langley, Paul
- Rating Change
2158±66 + 1 = 2159±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1747±33
- Abdilla, George
- 10 6 2
- 0
- 1713±43
- Zhang, Michael
- 7 6 2
- 0
- 1703±49
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- 7 6 8
- Lau, Ivan
- Rating Change
893±44 + 15 = 908±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 863±60
- Ghulami, Mustafa
- 5 8 9
- +4
- 782±52
- Cunningham, Alex
- 5 −11 7 9
- +1
- 688±67
- Low, Lewis
- 10 6 8
- Lawrie, Daniel
- Rating Change
1271±40 − 15 = 1256±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1201±45
- Teagle, Ken
- 13 −8 10 8
- −17
- 1157±42
- Mills, Toby
- 8 7 6
- −5
- 1333±38
- Farley, Craig
- 3 8 5
- Lawrie, Lynda
- Rating Change
1123±34 + 5 = 1128±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1214±68
- Mills, Toby
- 9 −10 10 7
- −5
- 1186±44
- Teagle, Ken
- −11 −12 9 7 1
- −1
- 1338±38
- Farley, Craig
- 8 2 6
- Le, Triet
- Rating Change
1367±60 + 7 = 1374±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1174±41
- Mitev, Thomas
- 8 −7 5 −9 7
- +2
- 1137±38
- Darwent, Dawn
- 8 −9 8 7
- +2
- 1121±46
- Chan, Allen
- 5 −10 1 5
- Le, Tuan Quang
- Rating Change
930±45 + 32 = 962±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1154±67
- Grounds, Roger
- −4 7 −12 10 6
- +3
- 789±47
- Franklin, Owen
- 6 6 6
- +1
- 737±52
- Grounds, William
- 1 4 3
- Lee, Andrew
- Rating Change
1135±48 + 2 = 1137±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1072±59
- Logvinski, Anatoli
- −4 9 −9 7 7
- −12
- 1164±40
- Mitev, Thomas
- 6 −6 9 4
- +6
- 1047±58
- Zuific, Ismet
- 8 10 8
- Li, Glen
- Rating Change
868±52 + 5 = 873±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 647±99
- Plant, Tom
- 8 4 −5 8
- +2
- 639±76
- Rosling, Lu
- 11 6 4
- Liang, David
- Rating Change
1713±46 + 2 = 1715±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1444±45
- Zhao, Mark
- −13 4 7 9
- 0
- 1395±46
- Wang, Dennis
- 7 11 9
- 0
- 1393±49
- Fan, Tian
- 8 2 10
- Liang, Keyman
- Rating Change
1964±56 + 22 = 1986±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1949±48
- Pandit, Sharad
- −9 −10 9 8 8
- +3
- 1784±51
- Akonor, Solomon
- 4 −5 9 9
- +2
- 1776±33
- Walker, Trevor
- −10 8 1 6
- Logvinski, Anatoli
- Rating Change
1004±70 + 52 = 1056±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 1107±83
- Box, David
- 2 6 8
- −11
- 1128±44
- Lee, Andrew
- −4 9 −9 7 7
- +27
- 1080±46
- Day, Peter
- −5 8 8 2
- Low, Lewis
- Rating Change
711±72 − 30 = 681±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −24
- 747±41
- Beames, Max
- 3 9 4
- −4
- 904±44
- Lau, Ivan
- 10 6 8
- −3
- 928±41
- Thomas, Max
- 6 2 8
- Luong, Liem
- Rating Change
1754±53 + 17 = 1771±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1725±48
- Hua, Jordan
- −12 −9 4 4 6
- −4
- 1937±64
- Wang, Stephen
- 7 9 −7 4
- +7
- 1660±70
- Ngu, Stephy
- −11 7 8 7
- Luong, Trung
- Rating Change
951±59 + 14 = 965±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 869±61
- Zhang, Peter
- 6 7 −6 6
- −1
- 1272±59
- Hayter, Steve
- −5 7 3 −10 8
- +4
- 708±175
- Ellis, Daniel
- 3 8 4
- Maddigan, Damien
- Rating Change
1328±48 + 22 = 1350±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1363±37
- Coombes, Julie
- 10 6 −10 5
- −4
- 1487±49
- Coxon, Andy
- 2 8 9
- +8
- 1285±63
- Agocs, Eszter
- 9 6 2
- Malyschko, David
- Rating Change
1574±41 − 3 = 1571±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1537±42
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- 5 6 7
- −15
- 1494±50
- Aufiero, Stefan
- 9 7 4
- +4
- 1469±43
- Harrison, Keegan
- 15 10 −9 −8 12
- Malyschko, Kevin
- Rating Change
1757±44 − 12 = 1745±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1526±47
- Townsend, Marc
- 8 9 5
- −14
- 1718±46
- Wang, Wilsen
- 9 3 −9 8
- +1
- 1472±47
- Gliessert, Joel
- −14 4 7 6
- Marchesan, Anthony
- Rating Change
962±55 − 7 = 955±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 857±62
- Bonner, Bev
- 8 6 7
- −20
- 935±63
- Dong, Donny
- 4 −4 3 −8 6
- +4
- 785±91
- Chen, Edward
- −5 8 9 2
- McCloughry, David
- Rating Change
1188±39 + 10 = 1198±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1153±39
- Fung, Jasmine
- 6 5 5
- +2
- 1045±43
- Chandrasena, Samadhi
- 6 −7 11 8
- McDougall, Gary
- Rating Change
1562±36 − 21 = 1541±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1359±38
- Du, Sally
- −5 9 7 5
- −15
- 1431±35
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 9 6 12
- −7
- 1558±41
- Du, Phat
- −10 5 7 8
- Mills, Toby
- Rating Change
1161±51 + 18 = 1179±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1271±37
- Lawrie, Daniel
- 8 7 6
- −18
- 1118±33
- Lawrie, Lynda
- 9 −10 10 7
- +16
- 1204±40
- Jones, Stephen
- 2 −6 8 7
- Milsom, Lucas
- Rating Change
1487±37 + 23 = 1510±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1589±47
- Du, Phat
- 6 −7 −5 9 10
- +6
- 1452±36
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 7 −8 6 7
- +2
- 1361±38
- Du, Sally
- 8 8 12
- Mitchelsen, Phil
- Rating Change
903±70 − 7 = 896±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 801±58
- Jain, Isha
- −11 9 8 −4 7
- −28
- 897±52
- Jain, Akash
- 8 7 8
- +7
- 750±49
- Vishwachandra, Mihiri
- −8 5 10 4
- Mitev, Thomas
- Rating Change
1151±45 + 20 = 1171±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1145±46
- Lee, Andrew
- 6 −6 9 4
- −6
- 1261±42
- Au-Duong, Terence
- −9 10 3 −7 9
- +6
- 1082±57
- Nguyen, Thoi
- 5 −10 2 9
- −1
- 1372±58
- Le, Triet
- 8 −7 5 −9 7
- +5
- 1076±82
- Box, David
- −7 −8 5 4 4
- +5
- 1070±47
- Day, Peter
- 9 −8 4 10
- Mott, Andrew
- Rating Change
657±74 − 49 = 608±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −37
- 612±64
- Kohler, Celine
- 9 14 −8 8
- −7
- 796±41
- Thomas, Cam
- 8 8 6
- −5
- 805±45
- Taneja, Pranjay
- 6 8 9
- Neubauer, Ken
- Rating Change
1587±45 − 2 = 1585±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1553±34
- Stevels, Lenno
- 5 2 −6 8
- −12
- 1600±44
- Rochow, Ian
- 11 6 −6 8
- +1
- 1335±52
- Dawe, Andrew
- 4 4 6
- Ngu, Stephy
- Rating Change
1719±73 − 77 = 1642±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −64
- 1528±39
- Truong, Jayden
- −10 12 3 10
- −13
- 1764±50
- Luong, Liem
- −11 7 8 7
- 0
- 2095±61
- von Einem, Samuel
- −9 9 6 9
- Nguyen, Cindy
- Rating Change
881±53 − 46 = 835±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −22
- 811±43
- Woodcock, Thomas
- 10 2 2
- −14
- 833±47
- Hampel, Bailey
- −5 5 8 10
- −10
- 847±53
- Foundas, George
- 11 7 6
- Nguyen, Jennifer
- Rating Change
1098±55 + 78 = 1176±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +43
- 1335±46
- Takos, Harry
- 8 −7 9 −6 8
- −2
- 1346±56
- Akhurst, Matthew
- 9 9 9
- +37
- 1246±52
- Ahrens, Matthew
- 6 −5 10 8
- Nguyen, Ricky
- Rating Change
1427±39 + 19 = 1446±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1603±44
- Ruanglertboon, Will
- −5 7 3 7
- −5
- 1502±40
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- 4 −6 8 6
- +14
- 1555±35
- McDougall, Gary
- 9 6 12
- −5
- 1502±36
- Milsom, Lucas
- 7 −8 6 7
- −1
- 1636±50
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- 2 −7 6 −9 5
- −1
- 1661±66
- Ey, Jamie
- 7 3 6
- Nguyen, Sinh
- Rating Change
1379±45 − 5 = 1374±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1368±60
- Akhurst, Matthew
- 8 −5 5 2
- −19
- 1291±42
- Takos, Harry
- 7 −4 7 6
- +3
- 1220±53
- Ahrens, Matthew
- 9 8 7
- Nguyen, Thoi
- Rating Change
1062±68 + 9 = 1071±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1138±47
- Chan, Allen
- 5 10 3
- −17
- 1131±38
- Darwent, Dawn
- 12 12 5
- −9
- 1168±40
- Mitev, Thomas
- 5 −10 2 9
- Nguyen, William
- Rating Change
934±49 + 2 = 936±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 909±53
- Chapman, Andrew
- 6 5 −6 3
- −15
- 929±51
- Gong, Charlie
- 6 −8 8 8
- +6
- 838±54
- Golobokov, Vanya
- 3 5 6
- Northeast, Tania
- Rating Change
1170±51 − 8 = 1162±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1336±39
- Bungey, Greg
- 9 8 11
- −3
- 1348±40
- Kracht, Jurgen
- −6 6 6 9
- −2
- 1372±37
- Baker, Lorraine
- 4 6 6
- Norton, Frances
- Rating Change
1290±49 + 1 = 1291±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1332±49
- Hagel, Scott
- 8 9 8
- −23
- 1198±47
- Hussaini, Yasir
- 8 −7 8 −7 8
- +5
- 1178±50
- Pilavci, Omer
- 8 8 −9 9
- Oduyemi, Razaq
- Rating Change
1532±43 − 5 = 1527±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1420±42
- Ferro, Tony
- 4 4 −11 7
- −9
- 1562±38
- Malyschko, David
- 5 6 7
- Pandit, Sharad
- Rating Change
1922±48 + 16 = 1938±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 2052±54
- Houston, Scott Anthony
- 8 −7 9 −6 9
- −10
- 1972±55
- Liang, Keyman
- −9 −10 9 8 8
- +3
- 1773±33
- Rogers, Mitchell
- 8 4 −9 8
- Pannewig, Honey
- Rating Change
1160±39 + 11 = 1171±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1295±44
- Walsh, Dennis
- −7 10 7 7
- −3
- 1296±46
- Cheung, Natalie
- −6 7 7 7
- −3
- 1302±47
- Costabile, Maurizio
- 2 9 5
- Peters, Shane
- Rating Change
1022±51 + 50 = 1072±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1113±31
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 8 −9 10 6
- +22
- 1113±37
- Langley, Cynthia
- 19 5 6
- +2
- 864±81
- Knott, Peter
- 4 6 9
- Pham, Long
- Rating Change
713±81 − 34 = 679±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 823±44
- Woodcock, Thomas
- 4 5 7
- −10
- 846±47
- Hampel, Bailey
- 4 6 2
- −7
- 862±53
- Foundas, George
- 7 4 8
- Phung, Chris
- Rating Change
1396±60 − 26 = 1370±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1322±48
- Hagel, Scott
- 7 7 10
- −45
- 1144±43
- Pilavci, Omer
- 6 7 9
- +5
- 1224±52
- Hussaini, Yasir
- 7 −3 10 9
- −5
- 1513±45
- Chan, Michelle
- 8 9 −9 7
- +4
- 1210±54
- Stevels, Mathijs
- 7 −6 10 8
- −1
- 1661±53
- Goh, Royce
- 5 −10 6 5
- Pikula, Sandro
- Rating Change
1640±42 + 1 = 1641±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1530±48
- Townsend, Marc
- 9 −10 6 −7 9
- −6
- 1728±47
- Wang, Wilsen
- 8 −9 −9 9 8
- +2
- 1475±48
- Gliessert, Joel
- 5 5 −7 −7 6
- Pilavci, Omer
- Rating Change
1149±45 + 18 = 1167±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1402±51
- Phung, Chris
- 6 7 9
- −4
- 1283±45
- Norton, Frances
- 8 8 −9 9
- −3
- 1306±75
- Calipari, Matthew
- 7 5 6
- Plant, Tom
- Rating Change
654±102 − 15 = 639±97 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 870±51
- Li, Glen
- 8 4 −5 8
- −3
- 967±67
- Chen, Oscar
- −9 6 7 9
- −2
- 974±63
- Gerges, Youseff
- 7 5 8
- Roberts, Tony
- Rating Change
1215±61 + 17 = 1232±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1151±39
- Fung, Jasmine
- −3 4 5 7
- +4
- 1044±43
- Chandrasena, Samadhi
- 9 −6 11 3
- Rochow, Ian
- Rating Change
1612±49 + 1 = 1613±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1599±46
- Neubauer, Ken
- 11 6 −6 8
- −15
- 1615±40
- Bates, Stephen
- 6 2 4
- +3
- 1469±38
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 7 7 13
- Roder, Lenore
- Rating Change
945±47 − 1 = 944±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 863±43
- Campbell, Brooke
- 9 −8 10 −11 6
- −11
- 982±50
- Burrows, Alana
- 9 9 6
- +2
- 750±51
- Yunos, Naguib
- 6 10 4
- Rogers, Mitchell
- Rating Change
1772±35 − 1 = 1771±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1802±53
- Akonor, Solomon
- 10 8 −7 9
- −8
- 1768±33
- Walker, Trevor
- 10 −5 −9 9 6
- −1
- 1934±45
- Pandit, Sharad
- 8 4 −9 8
- Rosling, Lu
- Rating Change
642±77 − 7 = 635±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 871±51
- Li, Glen
- 11 6 4
- −1
- 967±67
- Chen, Oscar
- 1 5 2
- −1
- 974±63
- Gerges, Youseff
- 6 8 6
- Ruanglertboon, Will
- Rating Change
1621±48 − 43 = 1578±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1358±38
- Du, Sally
- 6 7 7
- −29
- 1430±35
- Nguyen, Ricky
- −5 7 3 7
- −16
- 1554±41
- Du, Phat
- −9 9 8 9
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- Rating Change
1497±43 + 14 = 1511±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1560±39
- Truong, Jayden
- 5 12 9
- −10
- 1519±48
- Sharma, Manoj Kumar
- 7 5 5
- +7
- 1452±36
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 4 −6 8 6
- Sharma, Manoj Kumar
- Rating Change
1495±52 + 40 = 1535±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1677±62
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- 6 10 10
- −4
- 1657±67
- Ey, Jamie
- 6 −9 −4 4 4
- +14
- 1519±41
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- 7 5 5
- Shaughnessy, Kelly
- Rating Change
1012±45 + 2 = 1014±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 953±62
- Surman, Theresa
- −9 7 8 −15 6
- −11
- 1025±70
- Ladduwahetty, Matthew
- 9 9 9
- +4
- 894±58
- Gallage, Kevin
- 3 6 −7 7
- Smiech, Alex
- Rating Change
1332±38 + 1 = 1333±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1214±55
- Stevels, Mathijs
- −9 5 8 8
- −2
- 1516±45
- Chan, Michelle
- 5 7 −10 3
- 0
- 1662±53
- Goh, Royce
- −10 −9 10 3 5
- Stevels, Lenno
- Rating Change
1574±39 − 27 = 1547±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 1451±37
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 10 −8 7 5
- −7
- 1577±41
- Neubauer, Ken
- 5 2 −6 8
- −5
- 1617±40
- Bates, Stephen
- 9 5 5
- Stevels, Mathijs
- Rating Change
1223±58 − 18 = 1205±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1329±37
- Smiech, Alex
- −9 5 8 8
- −5
- 1363±49
- Phung, Chris
- 7 −6 10 8
- −4
- 1388±51
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- 13 6 6
- Surman, Theresa
- Rating Change
935±68 + 6 = 941±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 941±74
- Flynn, Mark
- −8 6 5 12
- −16
- 1008±42
- Shaughnessy, Kelly
- −9 7 8 −15 6
- −2
- 1171±52
- Freegard, Anthony
- 9 5 6
- Takos, Harry
- Rating Change
1329±49 − 15 = 1314±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1396±43
- Nguyen, Sinh
- 7 −4 7 6
- −28
- 1132±58
- Nguyen, Jennifer
- 8 −7 9 −6 8
- −7
- 1377±45
- To, Tuan
- 9 9 8
- Tan, Kok Chong
- Rating Change
1449±43 + 3 = 1452±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1405±48
- Wang, Dennis
- 3 9 9
- −13
- 1428±48
- Zhao, Mark
- 8 10 8
- +7
- 1404±52
- Fan, Tian
- 6 9 11
- Taneja, Pranjay
- Rating Change
804±45 + 3 = 807±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 610±71
- Mott, Andrew
- 6 8 9
- +1
- 529±87
- Kemp, Linda
- 3 8 12
- Taylor, Lucjan
- Rating Change
1254±43 − 3 = 1251±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1328±50
- Costabile, Maurizio
- −6 8 3 9
- −11
- 1262±43
- Walsh, Dennis
- 6 −5 −7 9 7
- −8
- 1290±46
- Cheung, Natalie
- 7 2 6
- Teagle, Ken
- Rating Change
1210±50 − 18 = 1192±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1131±33
- Lawrie, Lynda
- −11 −12 9 7 1
- −18
- 1179±41
- Jones, Stephen
- −9 5 −9 5 5
- −9
- 1250±37
- Lawrie, Daniel
- 13 −8 10 8
- Thomas, Cam
- Rating Change
795±41 + 2 = 797±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 611±71
- Mott, Andrew
- 8 8 6
- +1
- 529±87
- Kemp, Linda
- 5 5 7
- Thomas, Max
- Rating Change
946±46 − 18 = 928±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 779±51
- Cunningham, Alex
- 7 7 7
- −21
- 815±53
- Ghulami, Mustafa
- 11 5 −9 7
- +1
- 686±66
- Low, Lewis
- 6 2 8
- To, Tuan
- Rating Change
1356±47 + 26 = 1382±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1371±60
- Akhurst, Matthew
- 8 −9 −8 3 10
- +9
- 1319±46
- Takos, Harry
- 9 9 8
- +3
- 1221±53
- Ahrens, Matthew
- 9 5 5
- Tomas, John
- Rating Change
1399±64 + 29 = 1428±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1313±49
- Costabile, Maurizio
- −9 9 −8 9 6
- +10
- 1308±48
- Cheung, Natalie
- 7 6 2
- +7
- 1277±43
- Walsh, Dennis
- 5 6 −8 8
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- Rating Change
1398±56 − 6 = 1392±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1210±54
- Stevels, Mathijs
- 13 6 6
- −8
- 1513±45
- Chan, Michelle
- −9 6 9 8
- −1
- 1661±53
- Goh, Royce
- 0 7 7
- Townsend, Marc
- Rating Change
1545±50 − 23 = 1522±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 1554±37
- Weaver, Richard
- 7 4 3
- −6
- 1635±40
- Pikula, Sandro
- 9 −10 6 −7 9
- −2
- 1743±39
- Malyschko, Kevin
- 8 9 5
- Tran, Duy
- Rating Change
877±54 + 19 = 896±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 915±53
- Chapman, Andrew
- −11 5 8 9
- −12
- 935±51
- Gong, Charlie
- 4 6 13
- +11
- 843±55
- Golobokov, Vanya
- 9 −11 13 9
- Truong, Jayden
- Rating Change
1554±44 − 10 = 1544±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1695±68
- Ngu, Stephy
- −10 12 3 10
- −17
- 1493±40
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- 5 12 9
- −5
- 1630±51
- Fathpour, Gholamreza
- 6 5 3
- −4
- 1651±68
- Ey, Jamie
- 7 5 6
- −2
- 1710±46
- Hua, Jordan
- 11 8 9
- 0
- 1942±63
- Wang, Stephen
- 7 −6 3 6
- Vanderklugt, Alex
- Rating Change
1707±55 − 5 = 1702±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1659±39
- Langley, Dyson
- 7 −9 9 9
- −19
- 1702±41
- Joshi, Ankit
- 9 9 5
- 0
- 2159±66
- Langley, Paul
- 7 6 8
- Verrusio, Adrian
- Rating Change
1449±39 + 17 = 1466±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1559±34
- Stevels, Lenno
- 10 −8 7 5
- −2
- 1608±44
- Rochow, Ian
- 7 7 13
- +3
- 1341±53
- Dawe, Andrew
- 3 6 3
- Vishwachandra, Mihiri
- Rating Change
754±50 − 9 = 745±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 887±59
- Mitchelsen, Phil
- −8 5 10 4
- −3
- 937±64
- Allington, Len
- 3 −8 6 7
- −1
- 1036±72
- Kirsten, Ernie
- −9 3 6 2
- von Einem, Samuel
- Rating Change
2088±61 + 8 = 2096±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1952±68
- Wang, Stephen
- 6 12 3
- 0
- 1714±45
- Hua, Jordan
- 5 1 2
- 0
- 1646±67
- Ngu, Stephy
- −9 9 6 9
- Vuong, Tuan
- Rating Change
915±55 + 4 = 919±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 862±62
- Bonner, Bev
- −6 −6 9 4 8
- −14
- 942±63
- Dong, Donny
- 10 10 −8 −5 11
- +6
- 793±92
- Chen, Edward
- 6 5 7
- Walker, Trevor
- Rating Change
1769±33 + 7 = 1776±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1779±33
- Rogers, Mitchell
- 10 −5 −9 9 6
- −1
- 1982±56
- Liang, Keyman
- −10 8 1 6
- −1
- 2021±50
- Houston, Scott Anthony
- 8 7 −9 8
- Walsh, Dennis
- Rating Change
1291±48 − 17 = 1274±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1261±40
- Taylor, Lucjan
- 6 −5 −7 9 7
- −25
- 1155±38
- Pannewig, Honey
- −7 10 7 7
- −3
- 1422±62
- Tomas, John
- 5 6 −8 8
- Wang, Dennis
- Rating Change
1416±50 − 22 = 1394±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1444±40
- Tan, Kok Chong
- 3 9 9
- −10
- 1452±50
- Kappellos, Harry
- 10 7 10
- 0
- 1714±46
- Liang, David
- 7 11 9
- Wang, Stephen
- Rating Change
1947±69 − 4 = 1943±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1779±50
- Luong, Liem
- 7 9 −7 4
- −10
- 2089±61
- von Einem, Samuel
- 6 12 3
- 0
- 1546±38
- Truong, Jayden
- 7 −6 3 6
- Wang, Wilsen
- Rating Change
1705±48 + 30 = 1735±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1759±44
- Malyschko, Kevin
- 9 3 −9 8
- +8
- 1647±41
- Pikula, Sandro
- 8 −9 −9 9 8
- +3
- 1564±36
- Weaver, Richard
- 10 −9 −8 8 8
- Waugh, Lionel
- Rating Change
1106±48 + 0 = 1106±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1110±31
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 4 −5 5 4
- −16
- 1090±37
- Langley, Cynthia
- 3 −10 6 −11 7
- +1
- 857±79
- Knott, Peter
- 6 9 −6 10
- Weaver, Richard
- Rating Change
1572±39 − 10 = 1562±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1536±48
- Townsend, Marc
- 7 4 3
- −16
- 1446±48
- Gliessert, Joel
- −9 9 10 −9 10
- −2
- 1732±47
- Wang, Wilsen
- 10 −9 −8 8 8
- Willis, Tyler
- Rating Change
789±53 + 7 = 796±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 755±52
- Brandt, Menno
- 5 9 −6 12
- −10
- 858±50
- Curle, Michael
- −7 7 8 11
- +4
- 648±63
- Brandt, Renier
- 3 8 10
- Woodcock, Thomas
- Rating Change
802±45 + 22 = 824±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 847±41
- Nguyen, Cindy
- 10 2 2
- +4
- 685±75
- Pham, Long
- 4 5 7
- +2
- 631±44
- Du, Nathan
- −11 −10 9 2 1
- Yunos, Naguib
- Rating Change
761±54 − 15 = 746±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 856±39
- Crowden, Caleb
- 9 −9 8 12
- −3
- 926±42
- Davies, Owen
- 6 9 3
- −3
- 940±43
- Roder, Lenore
- 6 10 4
- Zhang, Michael
- Rating Change
1719±48 − 7 = 1712±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1659±39
- Langley, Dyson
- 6 −13 7 −6 10
- −16
- 1701±41
- Joshi, Ankit
- 4 6 −6 4
- 0
- 2159±66
- Langley, Paul
- 7 6 2
- Zhang, Peter
- Rating Change
874±63 − 17 = 857±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 955±57
- Luong, Trung
- 6 7 −6 6
- −2
- 1093±47
- Hoang, Hung
- 7 6 12
- −1
- 1193±63
- Dang, Kevin
- 5 8 6
- Zhao, Mark
- Rating Change
1441±50 + 3 = 1444±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1464±40
- Tan, Kok Chong
- 8 10 8
- −14
- 1450±50
- Kappellos, Harry
- 6 −4 −9 9 9
- −1
- 1714±46
- Liang, David
- −13 4 7 9
- Zuific, Ismet
- Rating Change
1020±68 + 3 = 1023±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 1079±46
- Day, Peter
- 8 13 7
- −24
- 1018±83
- Box, David
- −7 6 10 7
- −9
- 1127±44
- Lee, Andrew
- 8 10 8
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 184. Matches: 276. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bungey, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 29873. Submitted: 2018-07-26 9:15 pm EDT. Revised: 2021-01-01 3:46 pm EST. Last processed: 2021-01-17 7:47 pm EST.