2021 CDTTA Pennants 2704
2021-04-27
Detailed Report
- Aghlara, Arash
- Rating Change
1019±114 + 73 = 1092±99 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +57
- 1004±44
- Brown, Andrew
- 7 4 4 10
- +16
- 904±118
- Thompson, Joel
- 5 6 7 4
- Aitken, Steven
- Rating Change
1497±105 − 53 = 1444±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1347±36
- Evans, Bruce
- 7 1 9 −9 −5 19
- −74
- 1414±32
- Edwards, Graeme
- −8 8 5 6 7
- Arsiwala, Mustafa
- Rating Change
1205±42 + 7 = 1212±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1047±144
- Lian Thang, Cun
- −5 −7 9 4 7 8
- +3
- 1047±144
- Ceu, Kerry
- 3 −6 6 9 8
- Arthurton, Frederick
- Rating Change
1130±94 − 36 = 1094±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1064±89
- Hawes, Clive
- −16 22 17
- −63
- 1040±44
- Ireland, Graeme
- 15 17
- Atalla, Maged
- Rating Change
836±51 − 14 = 822±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 933±94
- Van Koll, Marinus
- 6 7 7 −6 9
- −6
- 942±62
- Giuliano, Tony
- 5 −7 8 −8 9 7
- Beach, Stephen
- Rating Change
1145±50 + 6 = 1151±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1165±46
- Ede, Paul
- 9 8 −9 8 6
- −10
- 1203±29
- Thomson, Jamie
- 7 7 9 7
- Bellion, Anne
- Rating Change
1253±32 + 12 = 1265±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1263±29
- Pilz, Lothar
- 7 9 −7 4 11
- +4
- 1198±37
- Gaiser, Simon
- −8 9 −10 7 −8 8 4
- Bellion, Greg
- Rating Change
952±36 − 4 = 948±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1054±46
- Freemantle, Andrew
- −8 −9 4 5 −5 8 6
- 0
- 1306±153
- Lazaridis, Leon
- 9 8 5 3
- Bhiwarkar, Mangesh
- Rating Change
1317±43 + 20 = 1337±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1426±133
- Ho, Allen
- 5 −9 5 8 9
- +7
- 1261±28
- Pilz, Lothar
- 9 10 10 −7 5
- Bignell, Quentin
- Rating Change
1015±50 + 4 = 1019±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1018±84
- Davidson, Matt
- 7 6 −6 8 4
- −10
- 1075±42
- Eddy, Chris
- 9 7 9 5
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- Rating Change
1072±47 + 17 = 1089±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1193±39
- Wang, Yanchuan
- 9 4 −7 9 5
- −4
- 1205±31
- Goepfert, Paul
- 5 −8 9 −9 6 5
- Brincat, Tony
- Rating Change
1188±47 − 16 = 1172±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1243±40
- Hallett, Ken
- 3 2 7 6
- −7
- 1261±48
- Keating, John
- −9 8 8 −5 6 3
- Brindley, Aviva
- Rating Change
1386±50 − 9 = 1377±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1518±67
- Waterman, Keith
- 10 8 8 8
- −4
- 1531±41
- Brooke, Nicholas
- 13 7 7 −12 6
- Brooke, Nicholas
- Rating Change
1538±44 − 4 = 1534±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1382±48
- Brindley, Aviva
- 13 7 7 −12 6
- −7
- 1609±31
- De Zwart, Andrew
- −9 2 −7 7 −9 7 2
- Brown, Andrew
- Rating Change
992±45 + 5 = 997±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 996±37
- Emam, Arash
- 7 7 −6 −9 7 −6 9
- −7
- 1062±109
- Aghlara, Arash
- 7 4 4 10
- Cauchi, Travis
- Rating Change
1375±46 + 16 = 1391±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1364±38
- Shi, Matthew
- −4 −8 9 8 −9 9 9
- +4
- 1252±31
- Simons, Shane
- −8 5 7 7 1
- Ceu, Kerry
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 185 = 1015±131 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −150
- 1169±43
- Perkins, David
- 5 3 6 9
- −36
- 1211±42
- Arsiwala, Mustafa
- 3 −6 6 9 8
- Chau, Henry
- Rating Change
1019±53 − 16 = 1003±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 1039±38
- Zeng, Nelson
- 6 7 −10 10 4
- Chegini, Fereshteh
- Rating Change
749±51 + 1 = 750±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 970±120
- Gill, Cameron
- 10 11 −5 9 −5 11
- −22
- 678±51
- Thomson, Nick
- 9 5 7 9
- Chen, Andrew Z
- Rating Change
947±53 + 0 = 947±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 857±51
- Moore, Shane
- 8 4 7 9
- −8
- 1050±51
- Ding, Darlene
- 2 9 3 4
- Chew, Chuan
- Rating Change
1254±32 + 1 = 1255±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1262±43
- Hallett, Ken
- −6 2 7 7 11
- −7
- 1255±46
- Keating, John
- 6 6 −6 8 −11 9
- Collier, Mark
- Rating Change
1237±37 − 13 = 1224±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1199±43
- Stewart, Craig
- 7 −7 −9 −8 11 9 9
- −3
- 1365±94
- Prypoten, Oleg
- 7 −9 8 −9 7 8
- Cung, Robert
- Rating Change
1367±41 + 14 = 1381±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1407±34
- Cunningham, Bobby
- 9 7 −10 8 −8 8
- Cunningham, Bobby
- Rating Change
1417±36 − 20 = 1397±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1367±41
- Cung, Robert
- 9 7 −10 8 −8 8
- −9
- 1368±41
- Stevens, Colin
- 8 −7 −8 8 11 −6 7
- Datta, Rajib
- Rating Change
1455±38 + 7 = 1462±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1555±38
- Hall, Mark
- −9 9 9 −9 −4 11 9
- −8
- 1479±41
- Kempton, Rod
- −3 −3 9 6 4 −6 6
- Davidson, Matt
- Rating Change
1052±101 − 73 = 979±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −60
- 1006±48
- Bignell, Quentin
- 7 6 −6 8 4
- −13
- 1130±41
- Mehravar, Hassan
- 5 3 8 6
- Davison, David
- Rating Change
1208±101 − 28 = 1180±79 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1005±110
- Troy, Adam
- 8 9
- −40
- 1254±28
- Pilz, Lothar
- −20 19 13
- De Zwart, Andrew
- Rating Change
1606±31 + 7 = 1613±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1548±72
- Waterman, Keith
- 10 9 −14 9 −9 4
- +4
- 1542±43
- Brooke, Nicholas
- −9 2 −7 7 −9 7 2
- Dekker, Trey
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 167 = 833±105 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −115
- 917±87
- Van Koll, Marinus
- 5 5 3 1
- −52
- 933±60
- Giuliano, Tony
- 5 1 6 8
- Ding, Darlene
- Rating Change
1042±52 + 16 = 1058±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 959±52
- Huang, Leo
- 4 9 4 3
- +7
- 956±51
- Chen, Andrew Z
- 2 9 3 4
- Ding, Joshua
- Rating Change
1157±55 − 34 = 1123±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −23
- 1119±41
- Mapa, Genuka
- 6 −8 4 6 6
- −11
- 1176±55
- Yip, Albert
- 9 10 8 9
- Doughty, Christopher
- Rating Change
1402±36 − 1 = 1401±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1468±49
- Thawng, Cuan Lian
- 11 −4 −5 6 6 13
- −11
- 1337±42
- Smith, Greg
- 3 7 8 8
- Dyer, Terry
- Rating Change
1065±59 − 9 = 1056±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1181±101
- Imber, John
- 1 11 −8 6 −8 10
- Eddy, Chris
- Rating Change
1085±45 − 1 = 1084±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1030±48
- Bignell, Quentin
- 9 7 9 5
- −9
- 1127±42
- Mehravar, Hassan
- 9 14 3 8
- Ede, Paul
- Rating Change
1153±48 − 4 = 1149±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1125±41
- Tang, Swee Yin
- 8 9 9 11
- −15
- 1134±46
- Beach, Stephen
- 9 8 −9 8 6
- Edwards, Graeme
- Rating Change
1409±32 + 14 = 1423±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1517±99
- Aitken, Steven
- −8 8 5 6 7
- +5
- 1378±41
- Hewitt, Ged
- 6 11 7 −9 −8 −9 7
- Emam, Arash
- Rating Change
991±40 − 8 = 983±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 977±45
- Ponsonby, Mark
- 9 10 −5 5 −10 −9 6
- −13
- 898±81
- Thompson, David
- 5 7 9 −9 5
- +4
- 924±127
- Thompson, Joel
- 8 6 6 5
- −9
- 983±43
- Brown, Andrew
- 7 7 −6 −9 7 −6 9
- Evans, Bruce
- Rating Change
1355±38 − 13 = 1342±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1360±39
- Hewitt, Ged
- 6 −2 −3 3 2 10
- −4
- 1421±80
- Aitken, Steven
- 7 1 9 −9 −5 19
- Evans, Richard P
- Rating Change
1473±42 + 0 = 1473±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1046±37
- Zeng, Nelson
- 5 10 1 −5 7
- Fambawl, Chan
- Rating Change
1317±50 − 38 = 1279±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −22
- 1240±41
- Jefimenko, Walter
- −9 7 4 2 −11 −10 6
- −15
- 1268±45
- Spizzica, Tony
- 8 −9 4 4 9
- Florey, Linda
- Rating Change
568±94 − 26 = 542±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −19
- 708±44
- Van Veen, Peter
- 3 10 10 −9 9
- −7
- 762±44
- Harrison, Peter
- 9 9 2 2
- Floyd, Dannie
- Rating Change
984±46 − 21 = 963±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 975±42
- Goodwin, Jim
- 8 2 −5 8 6
- −7
- 1043±39
- Reisenberg, Julian
- −9 6 11 −9 9 6
- Freemantle, Andrew
- Rating Change
1032±45 + 27 = 1059±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1127±37
- Jafarzadeh, Jason
- 6 8 −9 1 8
- +5
- 950±35
- Bellion, Greg
- −8 −9 4 5 −5 8 6
- Gaiser, Simon
- Rating Change
1207±40 − 15 = 1192±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1224±29
- Tan, Yoke-Ching
- −12 8 6 6 6
- −6
- 1260±33
- Bellion, Anne
- −8 9 −10 7 −8 8 4
- Gill, Cameron
- Rating Change
1194±179 − 370 = 824±103 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −318
- 727±47
- Chegini, Fereshteh
- 10 11 −5 9 −5 11
- −51
- 945±50
- Gray, Kaitlyn
- 3 6 9 8
- Giuliano, Tony
- Rating Change
920±63 + 24 = 944±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 875±121
- Dekker, Trey
- 5 1 6 8
- +10
- 826±49
- Atalla, Maged
- 5 −7 8 −8 9 7
- Goepfert, Paul
- Rating Change
1211±33 − 3 = 1208±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1096±47
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- 5 −8 9 −9 6 5
- −6
- 1230±46
- White, Chris
- 7 8 8 2
- Goodridge, Robert
- Rating Change
1177±49 − 12 = 1165±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1104±44
- McErlain, Peter
- 11 7 9 10
- −22
- 1102±44
- Talolin, Nick
- 6 12 3 −4 −6 −6 5
- Goodwin, Jim
- Rating Change
985±44 + 1 = 986±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 974±44
- Floyd, Dannie
- 8 2 −5 8 6
- −11
- 1004±41
- Herweynen, Edward John
- 13 5 −6 −3 4 11
- Gormann, Ben
- Rating Change
1468±44 − 11 = 1457±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1553±43
- Smith, Jakob
- 6 10 9 4
- −5
- 1565±45
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- −7 6 8 5 7
- Gray, Kaitlyn
- Rating Change
944±50 + 9 = 953±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 886±126
- Gill, Cameron
- 3 6 9 8
- +1
- 701±49
- Thomson, Nick
- 1 4 1 5
- Hall, Mark
- Rating Change
1542±37 − 1 = 1541±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1609±44
- Menzies, Andrew
- 9 −4 −6 −6 10 8 6
- −14
- 1447±37
- Datta, Rajib
- −9 9 9 −9 −4 11 9
- Hallett, Ken
- Rating Change
1255±43 − 7 = 1248±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1177±44
- Brincat, Tony
- 3 2 7 6
- −13
- 1246±31
- Chew, Chuan
- −6 2 7 7 11
- Harris, Lachlan
- Rating Change
1345±47 + 21 = 1366±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1390±55
- Signor, Dominic
- 4 7 −6 7 7
- +5
- 1248±44
- Powers, Grant
- 9 −7 −9 −9 7 11 2
- Harrison, Leigh
- Rating Change
1235±45 − 18 = 1217±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1253±28
- Pilz, Lothar
- −11 −9 7 6 −8 7 6
- −6
- 1280±101
- Ho, Allen
- 6 4 7 8
- Harrison, Peter
- Rating Change
751±44 + 14 = 765±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 751±45
- Schmitter, Kristian
- 5 9 12 11
- +2
- 551±83
- Florey, Linda
- 9 9 2 2
- Harrison, Schae
- Rating Change
759±58 − 14 = 745±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 886±43
- Noble, Brian
- −6 4 6 10 4
- −6
- 896±51
- Newnham, Daniel
- 10 −10 4 −9 2 9
- Hawes, Clive
- Rating Change
1039±92 − 15 = 1024±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 936±76
- Hird, Bruce
- 17 −10 15
- −35
- 1065±75
- Arthurton, Frederick
- −16 22 17
- Hayden, Shane
- Rating Change
1309±36 − 3 = 1306±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1238±41
- Wagner, Arlene
- 9 −10 −8 8 −2 7 6
- −7
- 1322±54
- Strong, Belinda
- 4 6 8 6
- Herweynen, Edward John
- Rating Change
1014±44 + 0 = 1014±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 997±43
- Goodwin, Jim
- 13 5 −6 −3 4 11
- −10
- 1041±39
- Reisenberg, Julian
- 9 −4 11 3 9
- Hewitt, Ged
- Rating Change
1368±41 + 1 = 1369±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1352±37
- Evans, Bruce
- 6 −2 −3 3 2 10
- −8
- 1417±32
- Edwards, Graeme
- 6 11 7 −9 −8 −9 7
- Hird, Bruce
- Rating Change
965±90 − 45 = 920±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −30
- 1014±81
- Hawes, Clive
- 17 −10 15
- −15
- 1049±46
- Ireland, Graeme
- −19 13 8
- Ho, Allen
- Rating Change
1389±145 − 69 = 1320±90 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +37
- 1223±42
- Harrison, Leigh
- 6 4 7 8
- −106
- 1324±42
- Bhiwarkar, Mangesh
- 5 −9 5 8 9
- Huang, Leo
- Rating Change
950±54 + 0 = 950±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 857±51
- Moore, Shane
- 5 5 11 −9 −7 7
- −8
- 1050±51
- Ding, Darlene
- 4 9 4 3
- Imber, John
- Rating Change
1145±114 + 61 = 1206±95 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 1065±59
- Dyer, Terry
- 1 11 −8 6 −8 10
- +21
- 1050±42
- Zambrano, Carlos
- 4 9 2 6
- Ireland, Graeme
- Rating Change
1033±44 + 24 = 1057±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1153±90
- Arthurton, Frederick
- 15 17
- +5
- 939±78
- Hird, Bruce
- −19 13 8
- Jafarzadeh, Jason
- Rating Change
1131±37 − 16 = 1115±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −14
- 1039±44
- Freemantle, Andrew
- 6 8 −9 1 8
- −3
- 1245±173
- Lazaridis, Leon
- 8 9 15 6
- Jefimenko, Walter
- Rating Change
1252±43 + 1 = 1253±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1296±46
- Fambawl, Chan
- −9 7 4 2 −11 −10 6
- −13
- 1231±44
- Qin, Allen
- 6 7 −7 −10 2 5
- Jones, Warren
- Rating Change
1363±65 − 38 = 1325±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −28
- 1342±43
- Smith, Greg
- −7 8 10 −8 12 5
- −10
- 1440±46
- Thawng, Cuan Lian
- 8 7 6 6
- Julian, Rebecca
- Rating Change
1274±39 + 1 = 1275±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1221±44
- Stewart, Craig
- −11 5 −9 9 −8 8 12
- −5
- 1357±94
- Prypoten, Oleg
- 9 8 7 −8 3
- Jung, Tad
- Rating Change
1041±43 + 3 = 1044±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1094±42
- Shen, Yifeng
- 11 6 9 9
- −12
- 995±88
- Weiskopf, Eric
- 11 12 −10 −9 9 6
- Keating, John
- Rating Change
1217±45 + 54 = 1271±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1343±46
- Shang, Bo
- 5 −6 6 −9 5 −6 3
- +15
- 1261±32
- Chew, Chuan
- 6 6 −6 8 −11 9
- +10
- 1213±33
- Thomson, Jamie
- 15 −8 3 5 5
- +7
- 1179±44
- Brincat, Tony
- −9 8 8 −5 6 3
- Kempton, Rod
- Rating Change
1483±42 + 5 = 1488±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1470±38
- Datta, Rajib
- −3 −3 9 6 4 −6 6
- −5
- 1588±41
- Menzies, Andrew
- 7 −8 −5 5 9 −9 13
- Keyhoe, James
- Rating Change
1313±35 + 7 = 1320±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1270±47
- Li, Chunting
- −9 7 8 −9 7 −7 9
- +1
- 1125±56
- Rasekhi, Arta
- 7 8 11 −7 6
- Kheng-Lawt, Van
- Rating Change
1116±165 − 25 = 1091±97 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +66
- 1023±45
- Probyn-Smith, Garth
- 7 −7 6 −6 6 5
- −91
- 1146±36
- Oldham, Cameron
- −4 −11 −7 4 8 14 8
- Kung, Bernard
- Rating Change
1167±47 − 12 = 1155±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1021±45
- Probyn-Smith, Garth
- 9 3 −8 8 −6 8
- −16
- 1140±37
- Oldham, Cameron
- 8 4 12 −8 8
- Lazaridis, Leon
- Rating Change
1200±200 + 108 = 1308±150 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +100
- 1117±35
- Jafarzadeh, Jason
- 8 9 15 6
- +8
- 947±35
- Bellion, Greg
- 9 8 5 3
- Li, Chunting
- Rating Change
1270±47 − 10 = 1260±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1010±36
- Zeng, Michael Y
- 3 8 4 8
- −10
- 1315±35
- Keyhoe, James
- −9 7 8 −9 7 −7 9
- Lian Thang, Cun
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 185 = 1015±131 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −150
- 1169±43
- Perkins, David
- −1 −9 3 −8 8 8 7
- −36
- 1211±42
- Arsiwala, Mustafa
- −5 −7 9 4 7 8
- Lui, Enoch
- Rating Change
667±51 + 26 = 693±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 691±117
- Scott, Gregory
- 6 10 8 6
- +13
- 660±46
- Newnham, Trevor
- 9 9 −7 9 −5 8
- Mapa, Genuka
- Rating Change
1120±42 + 11 = 1131±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1141±51
- Ding, Joshua
- 6 −8 4 6 6
- −1
- 1413±43
- Nugent, Ben E
- 6 7 5 6
- Mazzaferri, Henry
- Rating Change
855±47 − 13 = 842±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 925±65
- Morgan, Shane
- 8 6 9 5
- −5
- 955±50
- Scanlon, David
- 13 −8 12 6 5
- Mazzaferri, Michael
- Rating Change
987±47 − 10 = 977±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1092±43
- McErlain, Peter
- 3 3 9 9
- −4
- 1116±46
- Talolin, Nick
- −8 7 9 −2 6 9
- Mazzaferri, Richard
- Rating Change
984±50 − 26 = 958±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −16
- 966±35
- Smythe, David
- 3 3 −7 −9 −8 13 9
- −9
- 996±46
- Newfield, Pete
- −9 7 −10 9 9 7
- McErlain, Peter
- Rating Change
1099±45 − 4 = 1095±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 981±45
- Mazzaferri, Michael
- 3 3 9 9
- −8
- 1155±47
- Goodridge, Robert
- 11 7 9 10
- Mehravar, Hassan
- Rating Change
1121±42 + 13 = 1134±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1092±43
- Eddy, Chris
- 9 14 3 8
- +3
- 995±80
- Davidson, Matt
- 5 3 8 6
- Mendis, Champ
- Rating Change
908±63 + 13 = 921±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 1015±93
- Thompson, David
- −4 −7 8 7 −4 7 8
- −16
- 958±42
- Ponsonby, Mark
- 11 3 −10 −7 −9 3 8
- Menzies, Andrew
- Rating Change
1605±44 − 13 = 1592±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1492±41
- Kempton, Rod
- 7 −8 −5 5 9 −9 13
- −18
- 1529±35
- Hall, Mark
- 9 −4 −6 −6 10 8 6
- Moore, Shane
- Rating Change
866±54 − 18 = 848±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 938±50
- Chen, Andrew Z
- 8 4 7 9
- −8
- 941±51
- Huang, Leo
- 5 5 11 −9 −7 7
- Morella, Alex
- Rating Change
1141±43 + 12 = 1153±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1134±44
- Perkins, Shaun
- 9 −8 7 −8 7 −9 9
- +1
- 926±38
- Salgueiro, Fernando
- −8 12 12 4 −5 9
- Morgan, Shane
- Rating Change
886±70 + 51 = 937±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +37
- 937±39
- Salgueiro, Fernando
- 8 −6 −4 11 9 −2 9
- +14
- 847±44
- Mazzaferri, Henry
- 8 6 9 5
- Neef, David
- Rating Change
1357±54 − 14 = 1343±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1236±40
- Wagner, Arlene
- 15 −3 −3 9 −10 7 8
- −21
- 1318±53
- Strong, Belinda
- 9 7 10 −5 8
- Nemenyi, Endre
- Rating Change
1648±46 − 36 = 1612±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −20
- 1540±41
- Smith, Jakob
- 7 4 10 8
- −16
- 1551±43
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- 8 3 −11 6 8
- Newfield, Adam
- Rating Change
1323±60 − 6 = 1317±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1250±45
- Powers, Grant
- 8 5 3 −4 8
- −17
- 1357±49
- Signor, Dominic
- −6 8 10 10 10
- Newfield, Pete
- Rating Change
975±47 + 33 = 1008±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1070±52
- Pether, Mark
- 11 −5 9 11 11
- +11
- 968±43
- Mazzaferri, Richard
- −9 7 −10 9 9 7
- Newnham, Daniel
- Rating Change
906±56 − 5 = 901±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 751±56
- Harrison, Schae
- 10 −10 4 −9 2 9
- −10
- 1001±43
- Zdimirovic, Zoltan
- 4 10 5 7
- Newnham, Trevor
- Rating Change
667±49 − 18 = 649±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 683±51
- Lui, Enoch
- 9 9 −7 9 −5 8
- −5
- 766±48
- Salgueiro, Christian
- −13 9 5 −11 8 8
- Noble, Brian
- Rating Change
891±45 − 1 = 890±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 752±56
- Harrison, Schae
- −6 4 6 10 4
- −5
- 1001±43
- Zdimirovic, Zoltan
- 7 −8 3 −3 4 7
- Nugent, Ben E
- Rating Change
1412±44 + 2 = 1414±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1194±55
- Yip, Albert
- 3 7 −10 6 9
- +1
- 1133±43
- Mapa, Genuka
- 6 7 5 6
- Oldham, Cameron
- Rating Change
1136±37 + 17 = 1153±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1186±141
- Kheng-Lawt, Van
- −4 −11 −7 4 8 14 8
- +10
- 1171±46
- Kung, Bernard
- 8 4 12 −8 8
- Perkins, David
- Rating Change
1162±43 + 10 = 1172±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1067±148
- Ceu, Kerry
- 5 3 6 9
- +5
- 1067±148
- Lian Thang, Cun
- −1 −9 3 −8 8 8 7
- Perkins, Shaun
- Rating Change
1155±49 − 32 = 1123±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −20
- 1088±44
- Rowland, David
- 8 8 9 12
- −12
- 1143±42
- Morella, Alex
- 9 −8 7 −8 7 −9 9
- Pether, Mark
- Rating Change
1063±51 − 13 = 1050±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 979±36
- Smythe, David
- 4 4 −11 −7 3 5
- −20
- 989±45
- Newfield, Pete
- 11 −5 9 11 11
- Pilz, Lothar
- Rating Change
1251±31 + 7 = 1258±28 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1235±32
- Tan, Yoke-Ching
- 9 −6 12 −12 7 8
- −6
- 1258±32
- Bellion, Anne
- 7 9 −7 4 11
- +5
- 1231±43
- Harrison, Leigh
- −11 −9 7 6 −8 7 6
- −3
- 1327±44
- Bhiwarkar, Mangesh
- 9 10 10 −7 5
- +3
- 1225±98
- Davison, David
- −20 19 13
- +2
- 1180±98
- Zschech, Brian
- 18 13
- Ponsonby, Mark
- Rating Change
969±46 − 3 = 966±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 932±59
- Mendis, Champ
- 11 3 −10 −7 −9 3 8
- −12
- 979±36
- Emam, Arash
- 9 10 −5 5 −10 −9 6
- Powers, Grant
- Rating Change
1257±47 − 15 = 1242±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1308±53
- Newfield, Adam
- 8 5 3 −4 8
- −5
- 1360±47
- Harris, Lachlan
- 9 −7 −9 −9 7 11 2
- Probyn-Smith, Garth
- Rating Change
1027±46 − 14 = 1013±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1021±120
- Kheng-Lawt, Van
- 7 −7 6 −6 6 5
- −4
- 1151±43
- Kung, Bernard
- 9 3 −8 8 −6 8
- Prypoten, Oleg
- Rating Change
1328±101 + 54 = 1382±91 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +38
- 1279±39
- Julian, Rebecca
- 9 8 7 −8 3
- +16
- 1227±35
- Collier, Mark
- 7 −9 8 −9 7 8
- Qin, Allen
- Rating Change
1243±46 + 4 = 1247±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1268±44
- Jefimenko, Walter
- 6 7 −7 −10 2 5
- −10
- 1274±45
- Spizzica, Tony
- 3 6 5 12
- Rasekhi, Arta
- Rating Change
1116±58 + 5 = 1121±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1013±37
- Zeng, Michael Y
- −13 9 8 3 −7 9
- −3
- 1319±35
- Keyhoe, James
- 7 8 11 −7 6
- Reisenberg, Julian
- Rating Change
1034±40 + 15 = 1049±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1024±44
- Herweynen, Edward John
- 9 −4 11 3 9
- +5
- 971±44
- Floyd, Dannie
- −9 6 11 −9 9 6
- Rodriguez Lovera, Jean Carlo
- Rating Change
1545±44 + 23 = 1568±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1628±41
- Nemenyi, Endre
- 8 3 −11 6 8
- +5
- 1461±42
- Gormann, Ben
- −7 6 8 5 7
- Rowland, David
- Rating Change
1083±45 + 20 = 1103±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1139±44
- Perkins, Shaun
- 8 8 9 12
- +2
- 928±39
- Salgueiro, Fernando
- 6 8 7 −4 4
- Salgueiro, Christian
- Rating Change
755±48 + 12 = 767±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 655±114
- Scott, Gregory
- 7 2 8 5
- +6
- 653±45
- Newnham, Trevor
- −13 9 5 −11 8 8
- Salgueiro, Fernando
- Rating Change
953±43 − 26 = 927±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 908±65
- Morgan, Shane
- 8 −6 −4 11 9 −2 9
- −10
- 946±49
- Scanlon, David
- 10 −10 −9 0 6 −8 7
- −2
- 1102±46
- Rowland, David
- 6 8 7 −4 4
- −1
- 1153±42
- Morella, Alex
- −8 12 12 4 −5 9
- Scanlon, David
- Rating Change
938±51 + 21 = 959±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 935±39
- Salgueiro, Fernando
- 10 −10 −9 0 6 −8 7
- +6
- 844±44
- Mazzaferri, Henry
- 13 −8 12 6 5
- Schmitter, Kristian
- Rating Change
740±46 − 1 = 739±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 724±46
- Van Veen, Peter
- −11 −7 −3 8 6 6 8
- −12
- 753±44
- Harrison, Peter
- 5 9 12 11
- Scott, Gregory
- Rating Change
800±150 − 174 = 626±102 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −139
- 682±49
- Lui, Enoch
- 6 10 8 6
- −35
- 762±47
- Salgueiro, Christian
- 7 2 8 5
- Shang, Bo
- Rating Change
1332±47 − 11 = 1321±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1272±42
- Signor, Sergio
- 7 −7 10 8 −6 8
- −20
- 1249±44
- Keating, John
- 5 −6 6 −9 5 −6 3
- Shen, Yifeng
- Rating Change
1103±45 − 24 = 1079±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −18
- 1030±41
- Jung, Tad
- 11 6 9 9
- −6
- 1166±43
- Van Adrichem, Nick
- 7 9 1 4
- Shi, Matthew
- Rating Change
1355±38 + 1 = 1356±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1355±53
- Tsao, Justin
- −7 10 13 4 6
- −8
- 1380±45
- Cauchi, Travis
- −4 −8 9 8 −9 9 9
- Signor, Dominic
- Rating Change
1379±55 − 9 = 1370±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1336±59
- Newfield, Adam
- −6 8 10 10 10
- −21
- 1351±46
- Harris, Lachlan
- 4 7 −6 7 7
- Signor, Sergio
- Rating Change
1293±46 − 30 = 1263±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −21
- 1197±29
- Thomson, Jamie
- 10 7 −6 7 7
- −9
- 1310±44
- Shang, Bo
- 7 −7 10 8 −6 8
- Simons, Shane
- Rating Change
1256±32 − 6 = 1250±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1331±45
- Tsao, Justin
- −4 9 8 7 −7 11
- −2
- 1387±45
- Cauchi, Travis
- −8 5 7 7 1
- Smith, Greg
- Rating Change
1324±43 + 30 = 1354±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1413±37
- Doughty, Christopher
- 3 7 8 8
- +11
- 1350±61
- Jones, Warren
- −7 8 10 −8 12 5
- Smith, Jakob
- Rating Change
1534±41 + 23 = 1557±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1628±41
- Nemenyi, Endre
- 7 4 10 8
- +5
- 1461±42
- Gormann, Ben
- 6 10 9 4
- Smythe, David
- Rating Change
970±36 + 3 = 973±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 969±43
- Mazzaferri, Richard
- 3 3 −7 −9 −8 13 9
- −5
- 1042±41
- Pether, Mark
- 4 4 −11 −7 3 5
- Spizzica, Tony
- Rating Change
1255±47 + 29 = 1284±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1296±46
- Fambawl, Chan
- 8 −9 4 4 9
- +11
- 1257±44
- Qin, Allen
- 3 6 5 12
- Stevens, Colin
- Rating Change
1368±41 + 14 = 1382±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1407±34
- Cunningham, Bobby
- 8 −7 −8 8 11 −6 7
- Stewart, Craig
- Rating Change
1206±45 + 6 = 1212±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1233±36
- Collier, Mark
- 7 −7 −9 −8 11 9 9
- −8
- 1268±36
- Julian, Rebecca
- −11 5 −9 9 −8 8 12
- Strong, Belinda
- Rating Change
1298±54 + 41 = 1339±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1364±54
- Neef, David
- 9 7 10 −5 8
- +17
- 1314±36
- Hayden, Shane
- 4 6 8 6
- Talolin, Nick
- Rating Change
1097±45 + 24 = 1121±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1186±48
- Goodridge, Robert
- 6 12 3 −4 −6 −6 5
- +4
- 982±45
- Mazzaferri, Michael
- −8 7 9 −2 6 9
- Tan, Yoke-Ching
- Rating Change
1230±31 − 1 = 1229±29 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1199±37
- Gaiser, Simon
- −12 8 6 6 6
- −5
- 1253±28
- Pilz, Lothar
- 9 −6 12 −12 7 8
- Tang, Swee Yin
- Rating Change
1132±43 − 17 = 1115±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −11
- 1139±45
- Ede, Paul
- 8 9 9 11
- −6
- 1203±29
- Thomson, Jamie
- 8 −6 −7 −9 9 7 8
- Thawng, Cuan Lian
- Rating Change
1461±50 − 17 = 1444±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1332±60
- Jones, Warren
- 8 7 6 6
- −23
- 1390±34
- Doughty, Christopher
- 11 −4 −5 6 6 13
- Thompson, David
- Rating Change
955±100 − 4 = 951±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +58
- 995±37
- Emam, Arash
- 5 7 9 −9 5
- −61
- 893±59
- Mendis, Champ
- −4 −7 8 7 −4 7 8
- Thompson, Joel
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 123 = 877±109 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −100
- 981±35
- Emam, Arash
- 8 6 6 5
- −23
- 1072±102
- Aghlara, Arash
- 5 6 7 4
- Thomson, Jamie
- Rating Change
1195±31 + 13 = 1208±29 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1283±43
- Signor, Sergio
- 10 7 −6 7 7
- −4
- 1260±48
- Keating, John
- 15 −8 3 5 5
- +4
- 1161±50
- Beach, Stephen
- 7 7 9 7
- +3
- 1122±41
- Tang, Swee Yin
- 8 −6 −7 −9 9 7 8
- Thomson, Nick
- Rating Change
679±51 + 24 = 703±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 779±55
- Chegini, Fereshteh
- 9 5 7 9
- −1
- 964±52
- Gray, Kaitlyn
- 1 4 1 5
- Troy, Adam
- Rating Change
1047±130 − 68 = 979±100 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −48
- 1127±85
- Zschech, Brian
- 7 14
- −20
- 1168±82
- Davison, David
- 8 9
- Tsao, Justin
- Rating Change
1347±53 − 10 = 1337±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1253±31
- Simons, Shane
- −4 9 8 7 −7 11
- −17
- 1347±36
- Shi, Matthew
- −7 10 13 4 6
- Van Adrichem, Nick
- Rating Change
1163±43 + 11 = 1174±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1085±41
- Shen, Yifeng
- 7 9 1 4
- +5
- 1074±94
- Weiskopf, Eric
- 6 −7 8 1 4
- Van Koll, Marinus
- Rating Change
885±92 + 57 = 942±87 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 880±117
- Dekker, Trey
- 5 5 3 1
- +22
- 828±49
- Atalla, Maged
- 6 7 7 −6 9
- Van Veen, Peter
- Rating Change
720±46 − 9 = 711±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 554±84
- Florey, Linda
- 3 10 10 −9 9
- −13
- 727±43
- Schmitter, Kristian
- −11 −7 −3 8 6 6 8
- Wagner, Arlene
- Rating Change
1243±42 − 12 = 1231±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 1301±35
- Hayden, Shane
- 9 −10 −8 8 −2 7 6
- −5
- 1335±47
- Neef, David
- 15 −3 −3 9 −10 7 8
- Wang, Yanchuan
- Rating Change
1202±42 − 26 = 1176±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −19
- 1067±45
- Breeuwsma, Andrew
- 9 4 −7 9 5
- −7
- 1231±46
- White, Chris
- 5 6 4 0
- Waterman, Keith
- Rating Change
1539±74 − 11 = 1528±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1382±48
- Brindley, Aviva
- 10 8 8 8
- −20
- 1609±31
- De Zwart, Andrew
- 10 9 −14 9 −9 4
- Weiskopf, Eric
- Rating Change
1016±101 + 36 = 1052±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +55
- 1058±44
- Jung, Tad
- 11 12 −10 −9 9 6
- −20
- 1170±42
- Van Adrichem, Nick
- 6 −7 8 1 4
- White, Chris
- Rating Change
1219±46 + 21 = 1240±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1213±33
- Goepfert, Paul
- 7 8 8 2
- +9
- 1184±39
- Wang, Yanchuan
- 5 6 4 0
- Yip, Albert
- Rating Change
1178±56 + 11 = 1189±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1134±50
- Ding, Joshua
- 9 10 8 9
- −2
- 1412±43
- Nugent, Ben E
- 3 7 −10 6 9
- Zambrano, Carlos
- Rating Change
1050±42 − 4 = 1046±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1184±102
- Imber, John
- 4 9 2 6
- Zdimirovic, Zoltan
- Rating Change
996±43 + 10 = 1006±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 911±55
- Newnham, Daniel
- 4 10 5 7
- +5
- 895±44
- Noble, Brian
- 7 −8 3 −3 4 7
- Zeng, Michael Y
- Rating Change
1014±37 − 5 = 1009±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1112±56
- Rasekhi, Arta
- −13 9 8 3 −7 9
- −1
- 1259±38
- Li, Chunting
- 3 8 4 8
- Zeng, Nelson
- Rating Change
1039±38 + 7 = 1046±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1019±53
- Chau, Henry
- 6 7 −10 10 4
- 0
- 1473±42
- Evans, Richard P
- 5 10 1 −5 7
- Zschech, Brian
- Rating Change
1157±101 − 11 = 1146±80 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1015±113
- Troy, Adam
- 7 14
- −29
- 1255±28
- Pilz, Lothar
- 18 13
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 155. Matches: 158. Club: Croydon and Districts Table Tennis Association. Province: VIC. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bristowe, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 39950. Submitted: 2021-04-30 7:17 am EDT. Revised: 2022-02-25 1:14 am EST. Last processed: 2024-04-28 11:40 pm EDT.