TTSA WINTER PENNANT 2021 Week 4
2021-05-24
Detailed Report
- Allen, Keith
- Rating Change
1438±52 + 26 = 1464±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1516±47
- Ouiyangkil, Pongsathorn
- 5 7 5
- −10
- 1505±58
- Chen, Luke
- 7 9 −7 2
- +13
- 1435±48
- Lau, Yuan
- −9 3 3 6
- Amin, Mahfuzul
- Rating Change
968±75 + 24 = 992±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 981±40
- Byrne, Sophie
- 7 −10 9 7
- −6
- 1165±42
- Byrne, Oliver
- 7 4 7
- −3
- 1228±50
- Roberts, Tony
- −10 7 6 −12 5
- Aouker, Anthony
- Rating Change
1035±84 − 76 = 959±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 683±75
- Petroccia, Lucas
- 2 3 3
- −55
- 927±61
- Plunkett, Malcolm
- 9 8 5
- −22
- 1005±78
- Pickett, Ross
- −8 8 −9 6 3
- Aufderheide, Steve
- Rating Change
1396±51 + 3 = 1399±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1149±69
- Kuhland, Manfred
- 6 6 7
- +1
- 1141±72
- Walker, Robert
- −9 −7 6 6 7
- 0
- 905±136
- Jansons, Linards
- −10 6 9 5
- Baig, Shaf
- Rating Change
1306±80 + 7 = 1313±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 1255±45
- Blewett, Griffith
- −9 8 9 8
- −35
- 1311±32
- Cherrington, Ethan
- 7 3 10
- +17
- 1252±62
- Denman, Shane
- 8 4 7
- Baker, James
- Rating Change
1258±76 + 18 = 1276±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1100±49
- Beames, Max
- 6 7 8
- +6
- 1075±57
- Ebero, Charmae
- 6 −6 7 6
- +2
- 1006±48
- Cooper, Nigel
- 5 −8 7 4
- Baker, Lorraine
- Rating Change
1265±45 + 10 = 1275±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1159±71
- Kuhland, Manfred
- 9 −9 −11 4 1
- +5
- 1151±74
- Walker, Robert
- 10 4 −6 6
- +1
- 908±138
- Jansons, Linards
- 6 7 6
- Bates, Stephen
- Rating Change
1556±45 − 17 = 1539±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1468±62
- Bedford, Mitchell
- 10 7 5
- −16
- 1501±56
- Tomas, Dragan
- 9 6 8
- −8
- 1587±49
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- −6 15 −9 6 4
- Beames, Max
- Rating Change
1068±47 + 22 = 1090±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1137±58
- Peters, Shane
- 8 −9 6 7
- −3
- 1265±75
- Baker, James
- 6 7 8
- +6
- 998±58
- Hein, Michael
- 4 −9 1 9
- Bedford, Mitchell
- Rating Change
1481±66 − 25 = 1456±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −18
- 1535±42
- Bates, Stephen
- 10 7 5
- −4
- 1649±38
- Freegard, Anthony
- 8 9 4
- −3
- 1687±73
- Thomson, Luke
- 5 −9 9 2
- Bellido, Sebastian
- Rating Change
1411±33 + 6 = 1417±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1485±72
- Phung, Chris
- 6 7 5
- −8
- 1390±57
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- −4 11 −9 4 3
- +5
- 1389±64
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- 5 −8 10 −10 5
- Bird, Betty
- Rating Change
1183±70 − 2 = 1181±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1150±53
- Lau, Ivan
- 9 −9 −7 8 7
- −42
- 1090±46
- Buckby, Lynette
- 8 5 −7 −5 9
- +16
- 1126±49
- Burrows, Alana
- 11 9 6
- Blewett, Griffith
- Rating Change
1263±49 − 17 = 1246±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1238±63
- Phatak, Abhimanyu
- 9 −8 9 −5 9
- −19
- 1208±51
- Roberts, Tony
- 4 −8 −8 7 11
- −9
- 1294±65
- Baig, Shaf
- −9 8 9 8
- Blumenfeld, Matthew
- Rating Change
1638±189 + 83 = 1721±152 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +51
- 1442±47
- Du, Phat Tang
- 8 6 7
- +21
- 1426±46
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 5 5 3
- +11
- 1403±50
- Nguyen, Sinh
- 4 9 9
- Bosco, Michael
- Rating Change
900±150 − 261 = 639±90 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −171
- 691±67
- Zhou, Miao Jian
- 7 −9 6 6
- −59
- 735±55
- Gauci, Daniel
- 2 −7 5 10
- −31
- 740±61
- Kalaitzis, Anthony
- 4 10 6
- Brougham, Eileen
- Rating Change
676±52 + 0 = 676±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 676±61
- Nguyen, Khiem
- 8 4 −8 9
- −13
- 713±45
- Do, Jayliah
- 0 7 7
- −3
- 868±88
- Do, Loan
- 8 6 8
- Buchanan, Ian
- Rating Change
873±72 + 9 = 882±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 774±55
- Woodcock, Thomas
- −8 6 −4 8 7
- −16
- 956±51
- Zhang, Alaric
- 9 5 8
- +10
- 754±61
- Foundas, George
- 7 8 −10 9
- Buckby, Lynette
- Rating Change
1071±49 + 40 = 1111±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1216±63
- Bird, Betty
- 8 5 −7 −5 9
- +9
- 1032±55
- Pandos, Peter
- 7 1 −7 −5 3
- +5
- 973±58
- Deutrom, Paul
- 8 5 5
- Bui, Vy
- Rating Change
1606±68 − 14 = 1592±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1748±48
- Ford, Frank
- 7 12 3
- −4
- 1802±59
- Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
- 6 −10 9 5
- −1
- 1924±50
- Lee, Isaiah
- −9 7 16 5
- Bungey, Greg
- Rating Change
1198±55 − 23 = 1175±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1260±60
- Costabile, Maurizio
- −8 4 7 −9 3
- −8
- 1278±54
- Walsh, Dennis
- −10 −5 5 6 8
- −3
- 1365±79
- Ting, Alex
- 5 6 −4 −9 8
- Burrows, Alana
- Rating Change
1111±51 + 2 = 1113±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1028±54
- Pandos, Peter
- 6 9 −8 −9 7
- −11
- 1161±59
- Bird, Betty
- 11 9 6
- +4
- 969±58
- Deutrom, Paul
- 7 1 4
- Bygrave, Adrian
- Rating Change
1639±59 − 31 = 1608±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1331±51
- Pickering, Claire
- 6 8 9
- −32
- 1472±45
- Grant, Paul
- 5 −10 7 −3 5
- 0
- 1254±75
- Stevels, Mathijs
- 9 5 8
- Byrne, Oliver
- Rating Change
1150±43 + 15 = 1165±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1143±67
- Teagle, Ken
- −8 10 5 −11 2
- +3
- 995±66
- Amin, Mahfuzul
- 7 4 7
- +2
- 993±71
- Hyland, Bernie
- 9 7 6
- Byrne, Sophie
- Rating Change
969±42 − 1 = 968±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1025±73
- Hyland, Bernie
- 7 8 8
- −11
- 957±71
- Amin, Mahfuzul
- 7 −10 9 7
- −3
- 1110±64
- Teagle, Ken
- 6 8 6
- Camillo, John
- Rating Change
1003±58 − 20 = 983±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 855±51
- May, Beverley
- −6 5 5 5
- −33
- 875±51
- Willis, Tyler
- −5 8 11 −8 3
- +6
- 848±65
- Edano, Julie Ann Rivera
- −10 9 −10 9 8
- Campbell, Gordon S
- Rating Change
791±60 + 22 = 813±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 1016±72
- Cao, Benito
- 5 10 5
- −27
- 727±62
- Wayne, Max
- −7 9 7 −6 15
- +9
- 716±63
- Westover, Jon
- 8 9 −9 4
- Cao, Benito
- Rating Change
1003±76 − 41 = 962±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 846±63
- Scarborough, Paul
- 6 −10 12 5
- −64
- 784±53
- Campbell, Gordon S
- 5 10 5
- +10
- 834±62
- Cook, Peter
- 9 −9 8 5
- Cha, Michael
- Rating Change
1066±60 − 40 = 1026±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 879±31
- Rogers, Jackson
- −8 7 −7 8 9
- −32
- 978±53
- Gissing, Oliver
- −7 8 6 1
- −14
- 1083±44
- Kluska, Thomas
- 8 9 −8 8
- Chan, Michelle
- Rating Change
1665±77 − 64 = 1601±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1475±55
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 4 −9 8 5
- −49
- 1564±43
- Stevels, Lenno
- 4 4 2
- −21
- 1621±40
- Neubauer, Ken
- 8 −10 6 4
- Chau, David
- Rating Change
1115±96 + 8 = 1123±94 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 848±40
- Davies, Thomas
- 3 7 −10 5
- +3
- 822±54
- Farley, Shannon
- 3 8 8
- 0
- 582±52
- Jefferson-Wetherill, Evie
- 2 3 7
- Chen, Luke
- Rating Change
1481±56 + 38 = 1519±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1474±49
- Allen, Keith
- 7 9 −7 2
- +16
- 1465±47
- Lowe, David
- 3 9 6
- +5
- 1358±64
- Coxon, Andy
- −9 7 3 −6 10
- Chen, Michael
- Rating Change
976±81 − 26 = 950±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 959±34
- So, Steven
- 11 7 7
- −36
- 974±37
- Fan, Lawrence
- 5 9 5
- −21
- 990±39
- De Palo, Hadrian
- 4 −7 7 −8 4
- Cherrington, Ethan
- Rating Change
1305±32 + 15 = 1320±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1352±73
- Baig, Shaf
- 7 3 10
- +4
- 1241±54
- Roberts, Tony
- 5 6 −10 −9 9
- +3
- 1233±63
- Phatak, Abhimanyu
- 8 13 −3 5
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- Rating Change
1214±95 + 50 = 1264±85 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 1119±53
- Fernandes, Glen
- 10 7 6
- +17
- 1116±59
- Surman, Theresa
- 16 4 −7 8
- +8
- 1056±54
- Zhu, Junjie Ross
- 8 10 10
- Cook, Peter
- Rating Change
800±68 + 23 = 823±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 774±60
- Wayne, Max
- −15 7 6 4
- −9
- 951±64
- Cao, Benito
- 9 −9 8 5
- +11
- 715±62
- Westover, Jon
- 6 7 2
- Coombs, Harry
- Rating Change
720±75 + 37 = 757±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 782±55
- Padamadan, Adrian
- −6 −9 10 7 9
- −9
- 885±66
- Padamadan, Adolfus
- 9 3 8
- +7
- 592±39
- Padamadan, Angelina
- 5 7 3
- Coombs, Howard
- Rating Change
915±89 + 48 = 963±81 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +40
- 919±74
- Padamadan, Adolfus
- 11 8 7
- +8
- 765±52
- Padamadan, Adrian
- 2 6 5
- +1
- 589±39
- Padamadan, Angelina
- 3 3 2
- Cooper, Nigel
- Rating Change
991±50 + 7 = 998±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1007±58
- Hein, Michael
- 9 −6 6 −6 6
- −7
- 1102±54
- Peters, Shane
- 4 9 −7 7
- −1
- 1268±74
- Baker, James
- 5 −8 7 4
- Cooroy, Arvin
- Rating Change
751±63 + 10 = 761±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 653±61
- Jiang, Hao Harry
- 9 8 −7 7
- −1
- 1073±92
- Feng, Kaiming
- 7 6 −17 10
- Cooroy, Mihin
- Rating Change
727±67 + 15 = 742±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 655±61
- Jiang, Hao Harry
- 7 3 −9 −9 6
- −1
- 1074±92
- Feng, Kaiming
- 9 5 7
- Costabile, Maurizio
- Rating Change
1247±64 + 25 = 1272±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 1183±51
- Bungey, Greg
- −8 4 7 −9 3
- +6
- 1102±54
- McGregor, Ian
- 11 8 9
- +4
- 1073±59
- Pannewig, Honey
- 9 6 9
- Coxon, Andy
- Rating Change
1389±72 − 42 = 1347±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −26
- 1411±47
- Lau, Yuan
- 3 7 4
- −10
- 1492±44
- Ouiyangkil, Pongsathorn
- 7 −8 10 10
- −7
- 1509±59
- Chen, Luke
- −9 7 3 −6 10
- Dabic, Bobby
- Rating Change
822±105 − 11 = 811±102 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1091±44
- Kluska, Thomas
- 1 5 6
- −4
- 1099±50
- Lee, Andrew
- 4 3 3
- −1
- 1211±63
- Smith, Andrew J
- 3 6 7
- Dart, David
- Rating Change
897±100 − 98 = 799±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 589±39
- Padamadan, Angelina
- 7 7 9
- −81
- 733±52
- Padamadan, Adrian
- 11 5 5
- −21
- 867±66
- Padamadan, Adolfus
- 5 4 8
- Davies, Owen
- Rating Change
1219±51 + 26 = 1245±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1310±52
- Heinis, Travis
- 6 6 8
- −5
- 1360±62
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- 4 9 8
- +7
- 1154±74
- Swanbury, James
- −6 8 0 −6 8
- −3
- 1409±54
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- 6 2 6
- +6
- 1150±59
- Sefin, Ahmed
- −8 7 5 −5 9
- −2
- 1441±61
- Phung, Chris
- 9 10 −7 7
- Davies, Thomas
- Rating Change
834±41 + 11 = 845±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 774±61
- Du, Nathan
- 9 −6 9 10
- −1
- 1118±95
- Chau, David
- 3 7 −10 5
- +6
- 769±61
- Du, Daniel
- 8 9 5
- De Palo, Hadrian
- Rating Change
992±40 + 6 = 998±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 973±64
- Chen, Michael
- 4 −7 7 −8 4
- −2
- 1191±96
- Grounds, Roger
- 8 9 −9 4
- Denman, Shane
- Rating Change
1266±75 − 32 = 1234±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1243±53
- Roberts, Tony
- 4 −10 6 6
- −41
- 1188±64
- Phatak, Abhimanyu
- 5 6 −10 1
- −14
- 1295±64
- Baig, Shaf
- 8 4 7
- Deutrom, Paul
- Rating Change
987±62 − 21 = 966±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1104±47
- Buckby, Lynette
- 8 5 5
- −7
- 1112±47
- Burrows, Alana
- 7 1 4
- −5
- 1133±47
- Lau, Ivan
- 9 9 5
- Do, Jayliah
- Rating Change
689±44 + 31 = 720±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 700±59
- Gibson, Joyce
- 6 6 10
- +10
- 685±48
- Brougham, Eileen
- 0 7 7
- +8
- 670±80
- Garland, Chad
- 3 4 1
- Do, Loan
- Rating Change
829±96 + 37 = 866±86 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 685±56
- Gibson, Joyce
- 6 2 7
- +12
- 675±47
- Brougham, Eileen
- 8 6 8
- +8
- 647±76
- Garland, Chad
- 5 3 7
- Dogar, Aryan
- Rating Change
1072±67 + 22 = 1094±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 996±59
- Shrowder, Jo
- 12 6 9
- +4
- 888±59
- Shrowder, Noah
- 8 6 7
- +3
- 854±58
- Dolan, Jake
- 7 2 6
- Dogar, Atul
- Rating Change
916±94 − 38 = 878±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 900±60
- Shrowder, Noah
- 0 0 0
- −66
- 824±60
- Dolan, Jake
- −9 12 3 3
- −17
- 971±58
- Shrowder, Jo
- 10 7 9
- Dolan, Jake
- Rating Change
840±65 + 15 = 855±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +30
- 928±74
- Dogar, Atul
- −9 12 3 3
- −13
- 933±54
- Zhou, Oscar
- −3 9 6 0
- −2
- 1091±65
- Dogar, Aryan
- 7 2 6
- Du, Cuong
- Rating Change
1143±48 + 11 = 1154±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1106±38
- Errington, Glenn A
- 7 12 8
- −6
- 1263±75
- Huang, Kenny
- 8 −6 −10 9 6
- +6
- 1046±59
- Vick, Melissa
- −10 6 5 10
- Du, Daniel
- Rating Change
789±68 − 32 = 757±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 585±52
- Jefferson-Wetherill, Evie
- 7 8 9
- −24
- 806±55
- Farley, Shannon
- 8 7 6
- −14
- 841±40
- Davies, Thomas
- 8 9 5
- Du, Nathan
- Rating Change
797±69 − 35 = 762±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 585±52
- Jefferson-Wetherill, Evie
- 7 4 8
- −25
- 805±55
- Farley, Shannon
- 8 −8 11 9
- −15
- 840±40
- Davies, Thomas
- 9 −6 9 10
- Du, Phat Tang
- Rating Change
1441±51 + 1 = 1442±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1577±56
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- 8 −9 9 10
- −23
- 1353±57
- Rochow, Ian
- −8 9 7 0
- −2
- 1709±157
- Blumenfeld, Matthew
- 8 6 7
- Ebero, Charmae
- Rating Change
1021±58 + 43 = 1064±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1141±58
- Peters, Shane
- −5 7 9 8
- −2
- 1267±74
- Baker, James
- 6 −6 7 6
- +13
- 1003±58
- Hein, Michael
- 6 9 6
- Edano, Julie Ann Rivera
- Rating Change
892±74 − 49 = 843±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −32
- 882±54
- Ly, Anthony
- 9 9 11
- −11
- 978±51
- Camillo, John
- −10 9 −10 9 8
- −6
- 1015±54
- Vernik, Kamilo
- 4 4 −11 −9 6
- Errington, Glenn A
- Rating Change
1097±39 + 0 = 1097±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1046±51
- Hoang, Hung
- 7 −10 4 7
- −7
- 1141±46
- Du, Cuong
- 7 12 8
- +1
- 862±68
- Le, Tuan Quang
- 6 6 11
- Fan, Lawrence
- Rating Change
976±38 + 6 = 982±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 976±65
- Chen, Michael
- 5 9 5
- −1
- 1192±96
- Grounds, Roger
- 10 6 −11 10
- Farley, Shannon
- Rating Change
787±58 + 32 = 819±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 780±61
- Du, Nathan
- 8 −8 11 9
- −1
- 1119±95
- Chau, David
- 3 8 8
- +14
- 774±61
- Du, Daniel
- 8 7 6
- Feng, Kaiming
- Rating Change
1063±95 + 16 = 1079±91 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 851±128
- Liu, Kyle
- 2 5 3
- +3
- 765±60
- Cooroy, Arvin
- 7 6 −17 10
- +2
- 746±63
- Cooroy, Mihin
- 9 5 7
- Fernandes, Glen
- Rating Change
1170±60 − 59 = 1111±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −42
- 970±57
- Ghulami, Mustafa
- 10 11 −10 5
- −11
- 1200±60
- Jhaveri, Kettan
- −6 −10 7 3 9
- −6
- 1247±87
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- 10 7 6
- Ford, Frank
- Rating Change
1732±45 + 20 = 1752±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1837±61
- Luong, Liem
- 5 8 10
- −3
- 1933±72
- Phan, An
- −7 5 −7 7 6
- +4
- 1601±66
- Bui, Vy
- 7 12 3
- Foundas, George
- Rating Change
721±74 + 26 = 747±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +53
- 905±50
- Roder, Lenore
- −7 2 7 −7 7
- −20
- 784±42
- Glassenbury, Ella
- 8 10 9
- −7
- 874±62
- Buchanan, Ian
- 7 8 −10 9
- Freegard, Anthony
- Rating Change
1638±39 + 14 = 1652±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1612±50
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- −9 3 4 10
- +4
- 1534±54
- Tomas, Dragan
- −11 5 10 5
- +2
- 1461±61
- Bedford, Mitchell
- 8 9 4
- Garland, Chad
- Rating Change
741±93 − 106 = 635±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −70
- 627±58
- Nguyen, Khiem
- −3 9 8 −4 10
- −30
- 710±44
- Do, Jayliah
- 3 4 1
- −6
- 859±88
- Do, Loan
- 5 3 7
- Gauci, Daniel
- Rating Change
760±57 − 14 = 746±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 676±99
- Bosco, Michael
- 2 −7 5 10
- −23
- 719±62
- Merola, Jon
- 8 8 9
- −3
- 960±76
- Pang, Josh
- 7 4 6
- Gaweda, Kyle
- Rating Change
1429±94 − 69 = 1360±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1139±58
- Sefin, Ahmed
- 9 −3 7 6
- −79
- 1257±52
- Heinis, Travis
- 9 −9 10 7
- +5
- 1137±71
- Swanbury, James
- 6 2 7
- Ghulami, Mustafa
- Rating Change
936±66 + 73 = 1009±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +48
- 1145±54
- Fernandes, Glen
- 10 11 −10 5
- −7
- 1100±57
- Surman, Theresa
- 10 8 −9 8
- +31
- 1082±54
- Zhu, Junjie Ross
- −9 10 4 −5 8
- Gibson, Joyce
- Rating Change
689±65 − 5 = 684±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 673±61
- Nguyen, Khiem
- 5 −6 −8 7 10
- −21
- 712±45
- Do, Jayliah
- 6 6 10
- −5
- 866±88
- Do, Loan
- 6 2 7
- Gissing, Oliver
- Rating Change
921±56 + 78 = 999±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +37
- 1124±61
- Zulfic, Ismet
- −6 −5 7 5 9
- +26
- 1047±54
- Cha, Michael
- −7 8 6 1
- +15
- 972±59
- Muhammad, Nayil
- 5 8 9
- Glassenbury, Ella
- Rating Change
773±44 + 19 = 792±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 786±56
- Woodcock, Thomas
- 2 −9 7 6
- −2
- 962±51
- Zhang, Alaric
- 18 9 7
- +9
- 767±62
- Foundas, George
- 8 10 9
- Goh, Hanna
- Rating Change
1511±44 + 50 = 1561±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1652±42
- Neubauer, Ken
- −4 9 7 7
- +18
- 1604±51
- Stevels, Lenno
- 2 6 −10 11
- +8
- 1488±57
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 8 5 8
- Goh, Royce
- Rating Change
1762±41 − 14 = 1748±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1723±38
- Malyschko, Kevin
- 4 8 −9 9
- −16
- 1679±47
- Joshi, Ankit
- 8 9 7
- −6
- 1801±82
- Swanson, Alex
- 6 −9 11 9
- Golobokov, Pavel
- Rating Change
1655±57 + 19 = 1674±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1555±43
- Prince, Chris
- −9 8 −9 9 13
- +7
- 1541±46
- Sharma, Manoj
- 5 −9 5 2
- +4
- 1494±43
- Herman, Alan
- 9 8 7
- Grant, Paul
- Rating Change
1475±51 + 21 = 1496±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1640±59
- Bygrave, Adrian
- 5 −10 7 −3 5
- −19
- 1439±36
- Rayner, Stephen
- 4 8 8
- +13
- 1475±37
- Lambert, Matthew
- 5 −10 −7 7 7
- Grounds, Roger
- Rating Change
1175±99 + 25 = 1200±95 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1000±40
- De Palo, Hadrian
- 8 9 −9 4
- +8
- 983±37
- Fan, Lawrence
- 10 6 −11 10
- +5
- 954±33
- So, Steven
- 7 5 −8 5
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- Rating Change
1564±58 − 23 = 1541±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1428±47
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 3 7 6
- −36
- 1414±48
- Du, Phat Tang
- 8 −9 9 10
- +5
- 1404±51
- Nguyen, Sinh
- −10 9 2 10
- Hartnett, Dennis
- Rating Change
1099±55 − 7 = 1092±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1119±54
- Lee, Andrew
- −6 5 11 10
- −21
- 1080±43
- Kluska, Thomas
- 7 11 −5 −3 6
- −6
- 1200±65
- Smith, Andrew J
- 2 8 8
- Hein, Michael
- Rating Change
1055±68 − 65 = 990±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −36
- 986±48
- Cooper, Nigel
- 9 −6 6 −6 6
- −18
- 1053±56
- Ebero, Charmae
- 6 9 6
- −11
- 1085±46
- Beames, Max
- 4 −9 1 9
- Heinis, Travis
- Rating Change
1297±58 − 11 = 1286±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +28
- 1438±91
- Gaweda, Kyle
- 9 −9 10 7
- −29
- 1228±45
- Davies, Owen
- 6 6 8
- −10
- 1346±52
- Wu, Bryant
- −6 7 10 10
- Herman, Alan
- Rating Change
1508±45 − 13 = 1495±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1595±48
- Wu, Aaron
- −6 2 7 6
- −4
- 1623±54
- Tickner, David
- 6 10 5
- −2
- 1674±54
- Golobokov, Pavel
- 9 8 7
- Hoang, Hung
- Rating Change
1074±56 − 40 = 1034±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −25
- 1007±60
- Vick, Melissa
- 6 −9 6 6
- −13
- 1091±38
- Errington, Glenn A
- 7 −10 4 7
- −2
- 1270±74
- Huang, Kenny
- 9 6 −9 6
- Huang, Kenny
- Rating Change
1255±77 + 20 = 1275±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1157±46
- Du, Cuong
- 8 −6 −10 9 6
- +4
- 1037±50
- Hoang, Hung
- 9 6 −9 6
- 0
- 860±68
- Le, Tuan Quang
- 11 7 8
- Hyland, Bernie
- Rating Change
1052±81 − 68 = 984±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −56
- 957±40
- Byrne, Sophie
- 7 8 8
- −8
- 1162±42
- Byrne, Oliver
- 9 7 6
- −3
- 1225±51
- Roberts, Tony
- 9 5 8
- Jain, Akash
- Rating Change
1306±67 − 15 = 1291±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1207±47
- Samaraweera, Nadini
- −9 7 −5 9 11
- −38
- 1199±61
- Li, Tom
- −4 8 9 6
- +9
- 1188±54
- McArdle, John W
- 10 8 −10 10
- Jain, Isha
- Rating Change
1151±71 − 1 = 1150±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 1218±48
- Samaraweera, Nadini
- −8 −5 6 6 2
- −25
- 1165±55
- McArdle, John W
- 8 3 8
- −13
- 1220±64
- Li, Tom
- 8 9 9
- Jansons, Linards
- Rating Change
919±143 − 13 = 906±137 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 1234±40
- Zhang, Peter
- 11 8 7
- −4
- 1277±45
- Baker, Lorraine
- 6 7 6
- −1
- 1401±50
- Aufderheide, Steve
- −10 6 9 5
- Jefferson-Wetherill, Evie
- Rating Change
588±53 − 9 = 579±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 749±59
- Du, Daniel
- 7 8 9
- −4
- 754±59
- Du, Nathan
- 7 4 8
- 0
- 1121±94
- Chau, David
- 2 3 7
- Jhaveri, Kettan
- Rating Change
1240±72 − 32 = 1208±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1117±53
- Fernandes, Glen
- −6 −10 7 3 9
- −52
- 1070±57
- Surman, Theresa
- −10 9 8 7
- +6
- 1055±54
- Zhu, Junjie Ross
- −8 9 8 9
- Jiang, Hao Harry
- Rating Change
678±65 − 36 = 642±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 726±67
- Cooroy, Mihin
- 7 3 −9 −9 6
- −12
- 750±62
- Cooroy, Arvin
- 9 8 −7 7
- −7
- 778±138
- Liu, Kyle
- 4 9 9
- Jin, Ming
- Rating Change
1292±57 − 9 = 1283±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1241±50
- Williams, Fraser
- −1 10 6 15
- −14
- 1343±55
- Szanto, Barnabas
- 6 4 9
- −9
- 1372±57
- Tomas, John Caesar II
- 3 5 8
- Joshi, Ankit
- Rating Change
1698±51 + 1 = 1699±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1764±39
- Goh, Royce
- 8 9 7
- −16
- 1688±66
- Lee, Sang Koo Owen
- 6 6 −7 −8 9
- −5
- 1808±51
- Rogers, Mitchell
- −9 4 −6 7 8
- Kalaitzis, Anthony
- Rating Change
719±70 + 42 = 761±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 772±60
- Merola, Jon
- −6 −8 6 8 8
- −3
- 962±76
- Pang, Josh
- 3 8 6
- +13
- 686±99
- Bosco, Michael
- 4 10 6
- Kluska, Thomas
- Rating Change
1043±44 + 45 = 1088±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1113±63
- Zulfic, Ismet
- 8 −10 8 7
- −1
- 1334±81
- Yon, Michael
- 7 8 −6 −8 8
- +16
- 1111±50
- Hartnett, Dennis
- 7 11 −5 −3 6
- +9
- 1034±55
- Cha, Michael
- 8 9 −8 8
- +4
- 957±59
- Muhammad, Nayil
- 8 −4 8 8
- +1
- 817±103
- Dabic, Bobby
- 1 5 6
- Kuhland, Manfred
- Rating Change
1189±76 − 41 = 1148±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −25
- 1228±40
- Zhang, Peter
- −7 8 11 8
- −13
- 1272±45
- Baker, Lorraine
- 9 −9 −11 4 1
- −3
- 1399±50
- Aufderheide, Steve
- 6 6 7
- Lambert, Matthew
- Rating Change
1471±37 − 4 = 1467±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1336±53
- Pickering, Claire
- 3 9 8
- −8
- 1484±46
- Grant, Paul
- 5 −10 −7 7 7
- +1
- 1258±76
- Stevels, Mathijs
- 4 2 −7 −4 9
- Langhans, Geoffrey
- Rating Change
1318±33 + 4 = 1322±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1448±57
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- 7 10 6
- −5
- 1347±65
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- −11 5 10 −7 11
- −2
- 1434±62
- Phung, Chris
- 9 9 6
- Lau, Ivan
- Rating Change
1137±54 − 5 = 1132±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1026±54
- Pandos, Peter
- 6 −8 8 12
- −14
- 1158±59
- Bird, Betty
- 9 −9 −7 8 7
- +3
- 968±57
- Deutrom, Paul
- 9 9 5
- Lau, Yuan
- Rating Change
1438±53 − 19 = 1419±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1363±65
- Coxon, Andy
- 3 7 4
- −17
- 1439±47
- Lowe, David
- 8 2 3
- −13
- 1447±48
- Allen, Keith
- −9 3 3 6
- Le, Tuan Quang
- Rating Change
873±71 − 12 = 861±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1030±58
- Vick, Melissa
- 7 7 9
- −3
- 1098±37
- Errington, Glenn A
- 6 6 11
- 0
- 1275±73
- Huang, Kenny
- 11 7 8
- Lee, Andrew
- Rating Change
1122±56 − 25 = 1097±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 812±102
- Dabic, Bobby
- 4 3 3
- −24
- 1069±50
- Hartnett, Dennis
- −6 5 11 10
- −2
- 1330±82
- Yon, Michael
- 6 −5 5 8
- Lee, Isaiah
- Rating Change
1899±48 + 26 = 1925±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 2008±100
- Phan, An
- 7 7 13
- +6
- 1814±60
- Luong, Liem
- 6 −3 −7 2 9
- 0
- 1593±64
- Bui, Vy
- −9 7 16 5
- Lee, Sang Koo Owen
- Rating Change
1733±78 − 22 = 1711±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +28
- 1711±47
- Joshi, Ankit
- 6 6 −7 −8 9
- −39
- 1707±37
- Malyschko, Kevin
- 8 6 −2 −7 14
- −12
- 1809±80
- Swanson, Alex
- 9 8 8
- Li, Glen
- Rating Change
992±41 + 11 = 1003±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1133±51
- McCloughry, David
- −11 4 7 9
- −3
- 1149±62
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- −9 9 7 8
- −3
- 1153±125
- Mehdipour, Armin
- −7 7 −5 8 8
- Li, Leon
- Rating Change
882±70 − 9 = 873±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1102±49
- McCloughry, David
- 11 −9 5 6
- −2
- 1153±61
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- 8 3 4
- −3
- 1172±119
- Mehdipour, Armin
- 7 9 9
- Li, Tom
- Rating Change
1178±61 + 60 = 1238±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +42
- 1327±63
- Jain, Akash
- −4 8 9 6
- +16
- 1165±60
- Jain, Isha
- 8 9 9
- +2
- 907±138
- Zhang, Mars
- 7 8 −7 9
- Liu, Kyle
- Rating Change
800±150 + 22 = 822±117 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +43
- 649±59
- Jiang, Hao Harry
- 4 9 9
- −21
- 1068±93
- Feng, Kaiming
- 2 5 3
- Lowe, David
- Rating Change
1464±51 − 11 = 1453±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1433±48
- Lau, Yuan
- 8 2 3
- −14
- 1487±45
- Ouiyangkil, Pongsathorn
- 10 8 4
- −10
- 1502±58
- Chen, Luke
- 3 9 6
- Luong, Liem
- Rating Change
1831±72 − 27 = 1804±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 1830±67
- Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
- 7 10 9
- −44
- 1734±44
- Ford, Frank
- 5 8 10
- −9
- 1917±49
- Lee, Isaiah
- 6 −3 −7 2 9
- Ly, Anthony
- Rating Change
834±64 + 70 = 904±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +35
- 927±54
- Willis, Tyler
- 9 11 −9 10
- +19
- 870±67
- Edano, Julie Ann Rivera
- 9 9 11
- +15
- 869±52
- May, Beverley
- 10 5 −3 −4 7
- Malyschko, Kevin
- Rating Change
1720±40 − 3 = 1717±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1744±68
- Lee, Sang Koo Owen
- 8 6 −2 −7 14
- −9
- 1743±38
- Goh, Royce
- 4 8 −9 9
- −4
- 1807±51
- Rogers, Mitchell
- −9 10 4 4
- May, Beverley
- Rating Change
880±55 − 28 = 852±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 882±55
- Ly, Anthony
- 10 5 −3 −4 7
- −7
- 979±51
- Camillo, John
- −6 5 5 5
- −4
- 1016±54
- Vernik, Kamilo
- 8 −8 11 −8 8
- McArdle, John W
- Rating Change
1168±58 + 13 = 1181±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1166±60
- Jain, Isha
- 8 3 8
- −8
- 1282±57
- Jain, Akash
- 10 8 −10 10
- +2
- 909±139
- Zhang, Mars
- 11 8 4
- McCloughry, David
- Rating Change
1128±52 − 26 = 1102±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 924±53
- Young, Tracey
- 2 −6 2 3
- −31
- 985±39
- Li, Glen
- −11 4 7 9
- +2
- 874±68
- Li, Leon
- 11 −9 5 6
- McGregor, Ian
- Rating Change
1109±56 − 10 = 1099±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1268±59
- Costabile, Maurizio
- 11 8 9
- −4
- 1283±53
- Walsh, Dennis
- 3 9 −9 9
- −1
- 1371±78
- Ting, Alex
- 8 9 11
- Mehdipour, Armin
- Rating Change
1100±150 + 81 = 1181±115 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +60
- 1007±41
- Li, Glen
- −7 7 −5 8 8
- +15
- 926±53
- Young, Tracey
- 11 9 3
- +7
- 877±68
- Li, Leon
- 7 9 9
- Merola, Jon
- Rating Change
718±73 + 37 = 755±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 776±53
- Gauci, Daniel
- 8 8 9
- −24
- 747±62
- Kalaitzis, Anthony
- −6 −8 6 8 8
- +22
- 747±62
- Zhou, Miao Jian
- −1 16 4 10
- Muhammad, Nayil
- Rating Change
974±68 − 17 = 957±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15
- 881±32
- Rogers, Jackson
- −6 8 −10 7 8
- −24
- 988±54
- Gissing, Oliver
- 5 8 9
- −8
- 1088±44
- Kluska, Thomas
- 8 −4 8 8
- Neubauer, Ken
- Rating Change
1635±43 − 5 = 1630±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1625±61
- Chan, Michelle
- 8 −10 6 4
- −18
- 1535±43
- Goh, Hanna
- −4 9 7 7
- +3
- 1466±82
- Wantanbe, Nozomi
- 6 −8 8 7
- Nguyen, Khiem
- Rating Change
670±71 − 27 = 643±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 671±78
- Garland, Chad
- −3 9 8 −4 10
- −30
- 657±49
- Brougham, Eileen
- 8 4 −8 9
- −19
- 658±59
- Gibson, Joyce
- 5 −6 −8 7 10
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- Rating Change
1613±55 − 13 = 1600±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1549±42
- Bates, Stephen
- −6 15 −9 6 4
- −15
- 1644±38
- Freegard, Anthony
- −9 3 4 10
- −9
- 1672±75
- Thomson, Luke
- 4 10 4
- Nguyen, Ricky
- Rating Change
1424±49 + 4 = 1428±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1397±56
- Rochow, Ian
- 9 9 8
- −6
- 1539±51
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- 3 7 6
- −2
- 1712±156
- Blumenfeld, Matthew
- 5 5 3
- Nguyen, Sinh
- Rating Change
1435±55 − 33 = 1402±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −26
- 1354±57
- Rochow, Ian
- −8 5 9 6
- −6
- 1538±51
- Hadergjoni, Saimir
- −10 9 2 10
- −2
- 1710±157
- Blumenfeld, Matthew
- 4 9 9
- Norton, Frances
- Rating Change
1300±46 − 9 = 1291±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1387±60
- Szanto, Barnabas
- 3 4 −8 −7 9
- −19
- 1207±50
- Williams, Fraser
- 4 8 8
- −5
- 1371±58
- Tomas, John Caesar II
- 6 −6 6 8
- Ouiyangkil, Pongsathorn
- Rating Change
1500±49 − 4 = 1496±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1463±47
- Lowe, David
- 10 8 4
- −20
- 1441±47
- Allen, Keith
- 5 7 5
- +4
- 1356±64
- Coxon, Andy
- 7 −8 10 10
- Padamadan, Adolfus
- Rating Change
883±77 + 7 = 890±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 827±73
- Dart, David
- 5 4 8
- −23
- 930±85
- Coombs, Howard
- 11 8 7
- +10
- 764±65
- Coombs, Harry
- 9 3 8
- Padamadan, Adrian
- Rating Change
759±59 + 0 = 759±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 852±77
- Dart, David
- 11 5 5
- −22
- 723±67
- Coombs, Harry
- −6 −9 10 7 9
- −3
- 948±83
- Coombs, Howard
- 2 6 5
- Padamadan, Angelina
- Rating Change
593±40 − 4 = 589±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 746±64
- Coombs, Harry
- 5 7 3
- −1
- 803±67
- Dart, David
- 7 7 9
- 0
- 956±81
- Coombs, Howard
- 3 3 2
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- Rating Change
1143±64 + 12 = 1155±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1006±42
- Li, Glen
- −9 9 7 8
- +3
- 924±53
- Young, Tracey
- 8 5 4
- +2
- 873±68
- Li, Leon
- 8 3 4
- Pandos, Peter
- Rating Change
1057±61 − 37 = 1020±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 1100±47
- Buckby, Lynette
- 7 1 −7 −5 3
- −12
- 1108±47
- Burrows, Alana
- 6 9 −8 −9 7
- −8
- 1129±47
- Lau, Ivan
- 6 −8 8 12
- Pang, Josh
- Rating Change
951±78 + 18 = 969±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 769±58
- Kalaitzis, Anthony
- 3 8 6
- +6
- 759±52
- Gauci, Daniel
- 7 4 6
- +4
- 726±61
- Zhou, Miao Jian
- 8 5 4
- Pannewig, Honey
- Rating Change
1079±61 − 9 = 1070±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1270±59
- Costabile, Maurizio
- 9 6 9
- −3
- 1285±53
- Walsh, Dennis
- 9 6 7
- −1
- 1372±78
- Ting, Alex
- 5 6 5
- Peters, Shane
- Rating Change
1175±68 − 62 = 1113±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1009±49
- Cooper, Nigel
- 4 9 −7 7
- −43
- 1040±54
- Ebero, Charmae
- −5 7 9 8
- −28
- 1076±45
- Beames, Max
- 8 −9 6 7
- Petroccia, Lucas
- Rating Change
628±91 + 54 = 682±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +58
- 812±118
- Piotto, Anton
- 13 9 3
- −2
- 957±64
- Polisena, Dean
- −6 3 6 −9 6
- −2
- 970±66
- Aouker, Anthony
- 2 3 3
- Phan, An
- Rating Change
1986±103 − 47 = 1939±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1813±62
- Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
- 7 5 −11 7
- −67
- 1908±48
- Lee, Isaiah
- 7 7 13
- +6
- 1755±51
- Ford, Frank
- −7 5 −7 7 6
- Phatak, Abhimanyu
- Rating Change
1224±75 − 7 = 1217±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1262±64
- Denman, Shane
- 5 6 −10 1
- −29
- 1237±45
- Blewett, Griffith
- 9 −8 9 −5 9
- −11
- 1314±32
- Cherrington, Ethan
- 8 13 −3 5
- Phung, Chris
- Rating Change
1473±75 − 28 = 1445±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1324±32
- Langhans, Geoffrey
- 9 9 6
- −43
- 1409±32
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 6 7 5
- +4
- 1247±45
- Davies, Owen
- 9 10 −7 7
- Pickering, Claire
- Rating Change
1301±55 + 29 = 1330±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1466±42
- Rayner, Stephen
- 9 10 4
- −5
- 1464±35
- Lambert, Matthew
- 3 9 8
- −1
- 1608±45
- Bygrave, Adrian
- 6 8 9
- Pickett, Ross
- Rating Change
1078±102 − 50 = 1028±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 985±70
- Aouker, Anthony
- −8 8 −9 6 3
- −84
- 920±64
- Polisena, Dean
- 7 8 7
- +2
- 700±110
- Piotto, Anton
- 8 9 7
- Piotto, Anton
- Rating Change
900±150 − 208 = 692±107 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −189
- 622±89
- Petroccia, Lucas
- 13 9 3
- −14
- 946±60
- Plunkett, Malcolm
- 3 4 5
- −5
- 1027±77
- Pickett, Ross
- 8 9 7
- Plunkett, Malcolm
- Rating Change
946±69 + 8 = 954±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1009±75
- Aouker, Anthony
- 9 8 5
- −28
- 933±66
- Polisena, Dean
- 3 11 5
- +3
- 709±114
- Piotto, Anton
- 3 4 5
- Polisena, Dean
- Rating Change
886±67 + 88 = 974±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +53
- 1127±95
- Pickett, Ross
- 7 8 7
- +33
- 995±66
- Plunkett, Malcolm
- 3 11 5
- +2
- 689±77
- Petroccia, Lucas
- −6 3 6 −9 6
- Prince, Chris
- Rating Change
1579±47 − 26 = 1553±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1589±48
- Wu, Aaron
- 11 7 −9 8
- −9
- 1616±54
- Tickner, David
- 7 8 8
- −5
- 1670±55
- Golobokov, Pavel
- −9 8 −9 9 13
- Rayner, Stephen
- Rating Change
1453±40 − 3 = 1450±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 1520±55
- Grant, Paul
- 4 8 8
- −17
- 1297±54
- Pickering, Claire
- 9 10 4
- +2
- 1259±76
- Stevels, Mathijs
- 4 9 7
- Roberts, Tony
- Rating Change
1212±63 + 10 = 1222±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1263±45
- Blewett, Griffith
- 4 −8 −8 7 11
- −22
- 1217±60
- Denman, Shane
- 4 −10 6 6
- +9
- 1132±65
- Teagle, Ken
- 6 9 −13 −13 7
- −7
- 1314±32
- Cherrington, Ethan
- 5 6 −10 −9 9
- +2
- 992±65
- Amin, Mahfuzul
- −10 7 6 −12 5
- +2
- 989±70
- Hyland, Bernie
- 9 5 8
- Rochow, Ian
- Rating Change
1327±66 + 55 = 1382±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +42
- 1463±49
- Du, Phat Tang
- −8 9 7 0
- −14
- 1416±48
- Nguyen, Ricky
- 9 9 8
- +26
- 1425±52
- Nguyen, Sinh
- −8 5 9 6
- Roder, Lenore
- Rating Change
912±55 − 39 = 873±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 771±55
- Woodcock, Thomas
- 8 −10 −10 8 11
- −37
- 692±69
- Foundas, George
- −7 2 7 −7 7
- −10
- 953±51
- Zhang, Alaric
- 3 7 10
- Rogers, Jackson
- Rating Change
883±32 − 8 = 875±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 929±61
- Muhammad, Nayil
- −6 8 −10 7 8
- −2
- 1010±54
- Cha, Michael
- −8 7 −7 8 9
- −1
- 1077±58
- Zulfic, Ismet
- −7 4 6 8
- Rogers, Mitchell
- Rating Change
1783±52 + 38 = 1821±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1904±102
- Swanson, Alex
- −9 4 7 10
- +9
- 1722±37
- Malyschko, Kevin
- −9 10 4 4
- +7
- 1708±47
- Joshi, Ankit
- −9 4 −6 7 8
- Salvagno, Riccardo
- Rating Change
1424±63 − 9 = 1415±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1424±34
- Bellido, Sebastian
- −4 11 −9 4 3
- −40
- 1311±32
- Langhans, Geoffrey
- 7 10 6
- +5
- 1248±46
- Davies, Owen
- 6 2 6
- Samaraweera, Nadini
- Rating Change
1224±50 − 31 = 1193±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 901±136
- Zhang, Mars
- −7 6 6 5
- −24
- 1109±63
- Jain, Isha
- −8 −5 6 6 2
- −8
- 1276±57
- Jain, Akash
- −9 7 −5 9 11
- Scarborough, Paul
- Rating Change
815±68 + 19 = 834±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 772±60
- Wayne, Max
- 9 8 −7 5
- −10
- 950±64
- Cao, Benito
- 6 −10 12 5
- +10
- 713±62
- Westover, Jon
- 4 −12 6 9
- Sefin, Ahmed
- Rating Change
1156±61 − 17 = 1139±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −12
- 1238±45
- Davies, Owen
- −8 7 5 −5 9
- −3
- 1354±54
- Wu, Bryant
- −8 7 5 3
- −3
- 1366±73
- Gaweda, Kyle
- 9 −3 7 6
- Sharma, Manoj
- Rating Change
1567±51 − 27 = 1540±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 1591±48
- Wu, Aaron
- 5 6 −8 4
- −9
- 1618±54
- Tickner, David
- −10 11 5 −3 3
- −5
- 1671±54
- Golobokov, Pavel
- 5 −9 5 2
- Shrowder, Jo
- Rating Change
964±65 + 24 = 988±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 961±60
- Zhou, Oscar
- 7 9 6
- −10
- 1083±65
- Dogar, Aryan
- 12 6 9
- +12
- 905±74
- Dogar, Atul
- 10 7 9
- Shrowder, Noah
- Rating Change
934±70 − 60 = 874±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −38
- 836±79
- Dogar, Atul
- 0 0 0
- −19
- 924±54
- Zhou, Oscar
- 7 −7 −8 10 7
- −3
- 1086±65
- Dogar, Aryan
- 8 6 7
- Smith, Andrew J
- Rating Change
1215±72 − 3 = 1212±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1095±49
- Hartnett, Dennis
- 2 8 8
- −15
- 1319±82
- Yon, Michael
- 5 5 5
- 0
- 809±102
- Dabic, Bobby
- 3 6 7
- So, Steven
- Rating Change
960±34 − 9 = 951±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 919±67
- Chen, Michael
- 11 7 7
- −1
- 1194±96
- Grounds, Roger
- 7 5 −8 5
- Stevels, Lenno
- Rating Change
1573±48 + 6 = 1579±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1633±62
- Chan, Michelle
- 4 4 2
- −17
- 1540±44
- Goh, Hanna
- 2 6 −10 11
- +5
- 1475±83
- Wantanbe, Nozomi
- 4 3 −7 4
- Stevels, Mathijs
- Rating Change
1266±78 − 14 = 1252±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1447±35
- Rayner, Stephen
- 4 9 7
- −5
- 1465±35
- Lambert, Matthew
- 4 2 −7 −4 9
- −1
- 1608±45
- Bygrave, Adrian
- 9 5 8
- Surman, Theresa
- Rating Change
1070±62 + 47 = 1117±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +42
- 1265±68
- Jhaveri, Kettan
- −10 9 8 7
- −5
- 1262±86
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- 16 4 −7 8
- +11
- 1023±59
- Ghulami, Mustafa
- 10 8 −9 8
- Swanbury, James
- Rating Change
1166±77 − 30 = 1136±70 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −20
- 1238±45
- Davies, Owen
- −6 8 0 −6 8
- −5
- 1353±54
- Wu, Bryant
- 6 9 8
- −4
- 1365±73
- Gaweda, Kyle
- 6 2 7
- Swanson, Alex
- Rating Change
1846±116 − 15 = 1831±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 1755±38
- Goh, Royce
- 6 −9 11 9
- −73
- 1800±49
- Rogers, Mitchell
- −9 4 7 10
- +19
- 1723±63
- Lee, Sang Koo Owen
- 9 8 8
- Szanto, Barnabas
- Rating Change
1433±75 − 80 = 1353±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1292±52
- Jin, Ming
- 6 4 9
- −58
- 1228±51
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- 6 10 −12 9
- −35
- 1276±40
- Norton, Frances
- 3 4 −8 −7 9
- Teagle, Ken
- Rating Change
1158±76 − 38 = 1120±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 973±40
- Byrne, Sophie
- 6 8 6
- −32
- 1157±42
- Byrne, Oliver
- −8 10 5 −11 2
- −14
- 1220±51
- Roberts, Tony
- 6 9 −13 −13 7
- Thomson, Luke
- Rating Change
1651±80 + 41 = 1692±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1610±49
- Nguyen, Nghi Thanh
- 4 10 4
- +10
- 1533±54
- Tomas, Dragan
- 10 5 10
- +4
- 1461±61
- Bedford, Mitchell
- 5 −9 9 2
- Tickner, David
- Rating Change
1589±59 + 36 = 1625±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1559±43
- Prince, Chris
- 7 8 8
- +12
- 1545±47
- Sharma, Manoj
- −10 11 5 −3 3
- +7
- 1496±43
- Herman, Alan
- 6 10 5
- Ting, Alex
- Rating Change
1358±81 + 14 = 1372±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1176±51
- Bungey, Greg
- 5 6 −4 −9 8
- +3
- 1098±53
- McGregor, Ian
- 8 9 11
- +2
- 1070±58
- Pannewig, Honey
- 5 6 5
- Tomas, Dragan
- Rating Change
1516±61 + 13 = 1529±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 1555±42
- Bates, Stephen
- 9 6 8
- −8
- 1648±38
- Freegard, Anthony
- −11 5 10 5
- −5
- 1685±74
- Thomson, Luke
- 10 5 10
- Tomas, John Caesar II
- Rating Change
1351±61 + 36 = 1387±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1302±42
- Norton, Frances
- 6 −6 6 8
- +12
- 1298±53
- Jin, Ming
- 3 5 8
- +8
- 1269±53
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- 8 6 11
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- Rating Change
1215±56 + 46 = 1261±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +35
- 1394±60
- Szanto, Barnabas
- 6 10 −12 9
- −5
- 1378±57
- Tomas, John Caesar II
- 8 6 11
- +17
- 1249±50
- Williams, Fraser
- 5 −7 8 −7 9
- Tran, Nhan Thien Michael
- Rating Change
1839±75 − 44 = 1795±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1595±65
- Bui, Vy
- 6 −10 9 5
- −38
- 1777±58
- Luong, Liem
- 7 10 9
- −9
- 1923±72
- Phan, An
- 7 5 −11 7
- Vernik, Kamilo
- Rating Change
1051±63 − 33 = 1018±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 853±51
- May, Beverley
- 8 −8 11 −8 8
- −43
- 872±50
- Willis, Tyler
- −6 −9 6 4 9
- +4
- 845±64
- Edano, Julie Ann Rivera
- 4 4 −11 −9 6
- Verrusio, Adrian
- Rating Change
1465±62 + 4 = 1469±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1497±81
- Wantanbe, Nozomi
- 8 6 −8 −10 9
- −13
- 1549±46
- Goh, Hanna
- 8 5 8
- −6
- 1598±53
- Chan, Michelle
- 4 −9 8 5
- Vick, Melissa
- Rating Change
1006±66 + 28 = 1034±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1054±51
- Hoang, Hung
- 6 −9 6 6
- −8
- 1147±45
- Du, Cuong
- −10 6 5 10
- +6
- 869±70
- Le, Tuan Quang
- 7 7 9
- Walker, Robert
- Rating Change
1182±79 − 41 = 1141±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −25
- 1228±40
- Zhang, Peter
- 4 12 10
- −13
- 1272±45
- Baker, Lorraine
- 10 4 −6 6
- −3
- 1399±50
- Aufderheide, Steve
- −9 −7 6 6 7
- Walsh, Dennis
- Rating Change
1269±56 + 16 = 1285±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1181±51
- Bungey, Greg
- −10 −5 5 6 8
- +4
- 1101±54
- McGregor, Ian
- 3 9 −9 9
- +3
- 1072±59
- Pannewig, Honey
- 9 6 7
- Wang, Yanhan Dennis
- Rating Change
1356±76 + 16 = 1372±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +28
- 1327±32
- Langhans, Geoffrey
- −11 5 10 −7 11
- −22
- 1413±32
- Bellido, Sebastian
- 5 −8 10 −10 5
- +10
- 1251±47
- Davies, Owen
- 4 9 8
- Wantanbe, Nozomi
- Rating Change
1552±93 − 102 = 1450±79 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −70
- 1445±58
- Verrusio, Adrian
- 8 6 −8 −10 9
- −22
- 1572±43
- Stevels, Lenno
- 4 3 −7 4
- −10
- 1627±40
- Neubauer, Ken
- 6 −8 8 7
- Wayne, Max
- Rating Change
763±69 + 3 = 766±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 845±59
- Campbell, Gordon S
- −7 9 7 −6 15
- −19
- 812±62
- Cook, Peter
- −15 7 6 4
- −14
- 825±62
- Scarborough, Paul
- 9 8 −7 5
- Westover, Jon
- Rating Change
749±70 − 43 = 706±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −19
- 806±55
- Campbell, Gordon S
- 8 9 −9 4
- −14
- 814±62
- Cook, Peter
- 6 7 2
- −10
- 826±62
- Scarborough, Paul
- 4 −12 6 9
- Williams, Fraser
- Rating Change
1237±56 − 4 = 1233±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +25
- 1310±44
- Norton, Frances
- 4 8 8
- −17
- 1244±52
- Tomaselli, Rodney
- 5 −7 8 −7 9
- −11
- 1274±52
- Jin, Ming
- −1 10 6 15
- Willis, Tyler
- Rating Change
861±56 + 47 = 908±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +35
- 1062±61
- Vernik, Kamilo
- −6 −9 6 4 9
- −16
- 884±55
- Ly, Anthony
- 9 11 −9 10
- +28
- 1018±55
- Camillo, John
- −5 8 11 −8 3
- Woodcock, Thomas
- Rating Change
806±60 − 44 = 762±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −25
- 778±42
- Glassenbury, Ella
- 2 −9 7 6
- −10
- 865±64
- Buchanan, Ian
- −8 6 −4 8 7
- −9
- 866±51
- Roder, Lenore
- 8 −10 −10 8 11
- Wu, Aaron
- Rating Change
1564±53 + 35 = 1599±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1561±43
- Prince, Chris
- 11 7 −9 8
- +12
- 1547±47
- Sharma, Manoj
- 5 6 −8 4
- +7
- 1498±43
- Herman, Alan
- −6 2 7 6
- Wu, Bryant
- Rating Change
1339±52 + 16 = 1355±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1297±52
- Heinis, Travis
- −6 7 10 10
- +2
- 1141±58
- Sefin, Ahmed
- −8 7 5 3
- +2
- 1140±72
- Swanbury, James
- 6 9 8
- Yon, Michael
- Rating Change
1308±85 + 30 = 1338±80 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1228±70
- Smith, Andrew J
- 5 5 5
- +5
- 1103±51
- Lee, Andrew
- 6 −5 5 8
- +4
- 1095±46
- Kluska, Thomas
- 7 8 −6 −8 8
- Young, Tracey
- Rating Change
932±55 − 9 = 923±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −4
- 1100±49
- McCloughry, David
- 2 −6 2 3
- −2
- 1152±62
- Palaniappan, Arjun
- 8 5 4
- −3
- 1166±121
- Mehdipour, Armin
- 11 9 3
- Zhang, Alaric
- Rating Change
939±53 + 26 = 965±51 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +12
- 898±63
- Buchanan, Ian
- 9 5 8
- +10
- 888±51
- Roder, Lenore
- 3 7 10
- +3
- 794±43
- Glassenbury, Ella
- 18 9 7
- Zhang, Mars
- Rating Change
951±162 − 52 = 899±134 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −31
- 1178±53
- McArdle, John W
- 11 8 4
- −14
- 1198±47
- Samaraweera, Nadini
- −7 6 6 5
- −7
- 1231±63
- Li, Tom
- 7 8 −7 9
- Zhang, Peter
- Rating Change
1220±40 + 13 = 1233±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1166±71
- Kuhland, Manfred
- −7 8 11 8
- +6
- 1159±74
- Walker, Robert
- 4 12 10
- +1
- 912±139
- Jansons, Linards
- 11 8 7
- Zhou, Miao Jian
- Rating Change
719±70 − 7 = 712±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 686±99
- Bosco, Michael
- 7 −9 6 6
- −25
- 726±61
- Merola, Jon
- −1 16 4 10
- −2
- 962±76
- Pang, Josh
- 8 5 4
- Zhou, Oscar
- Rating Change
930±62 + 11 = 941±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 901±61
- Shrowder, Noah
- 7 −7 −8 10 7
- −17
- 968±59
- Shrowder, Jo
- 7 9 6
- +11
- 864±60
- Dolan, Jake
- −3 9 6 0
- Zhu, Junjie Ross
- Rating Change
1096±57 − 42 = 1054±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −32
- 976±58
- Ghulami, Mustafa
- −9 10 4 −5 8
- −6
- 1208±60
- Jhaveri, Kettan
- −8 9 8 9
- −3
- 1259±87
- Comelli, Robert Thomas
- 8 10 10
- Zulfic, Ismet
- Rating Change
1168±69 − 80 = 1088±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 878±31
- Rogers, Jackson
- −7 4 6 8
- −54
- 971±51
- Gissing, Oliver
- −6 −5 7 5 9
- −29
- 1076±42
- Kluska, Thomas
- 8 −10 8 7
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 199. Matches: 300. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Bungey, Greg. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 40266. Submitted: 2021-06-07 11:20 pm EDT. Revised: 2023-07-29 12:58 am EDT. Last processed: 2024-04-28 11:40 pm EDT.