Spring VETS Round 3
2023-10-16
Detailed Report
- Ahel, David
- Rating Change
1105±35 + 2 = 1107±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 982±34
- Huxtable, Claire
- 6 4 3
- −3
- 1236±41
- Long, Geoff G
- 9 5 6
- +2
- 967±47
- Simmons, Jon
- 4 7 4
- Ashford, Graeme
- Rating Change
945±39 − 15 = 930±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 720±40
- Bhargava, Sagar
- 1 4 8
- −15
- 834±38
- Manning, Lynne
- −7 7 10 6
- −1
- 1229±110
- Stringer, Robert
- 8 6 9
- Berry, Julie
- Rating Change
548±46 − 6 = 542±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 708±35
- Woods, Ursula
- 8 5 8
- −2
- 746±36
- Rowell, Janet
- 4 5 5
- −1
- 812±41
- Palmer, Jacqueline
- 4 4 1
- Beswick, Anthony
- Rating Change
817±79 + 4 = 821±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +43
- 930±40
- Von Gehr, Joshua
- 9 9 −8 −8 8
- −28
- 847±37
- Zhang, Jun
- −7 7 4 5
- −10
- 911±38
- Loveless, Susan
- 5 5 8
- Bhargava, Sagar
- Rating Change
727±43 − 9 = 718±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 799±37
- Bowden, Ian
- −7 8 6 8
- −1
- 929±35
- Ashford, Graeme
- 1 4 8
- −1
- 951±34
- Coombe, David
- 12 5 2
- Bilsborough, Matt
- Rating Change
970±37 + 17 = 987±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 976±37
- McKay, Phillip
- 6 −8 6 −6 9
- 0
- 1277±41
- Massie, Roger
- −8 3 7 9
- +8
- 969±31
- Smith, Don
- 4 7 5
- Bowden, Ian
- Rating Change
807±38 − 2 = 805±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 725±41
- Bhargava, Sagar
- −7 8 6 8
- −7
- 842±39
- Manning, Lynne
- 9 2 4
- 0
- 1234±109
- Stringer, Robert
- 8 7 6
- Bowden, Rob
- Rating Change
1304±46 + 4 = 1308±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1124±34
- Holcomb, Kim
- 3 10 7
- +1
- 1077±32
- Bowerman, Judy
- 9 8 12
- 0
- 952±35
- Peters, Stacey
- 11 7 10
- Bowerman, Judy
- Rating Change
1072±32 + 4 = 1076±31 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 992±42
- Mollineaux, Keith Phillip
- −3 9 −14 9 8
- −1
- 1307±46
- Bowden, Rob
- 9 8 12
- +2
- 933±42
- Sasse, Paul
- 7 9 6
- Burke, David
- Rating Change
775±57 + 9 = 784±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 756±41
- Rowell, Janet
- −7 6 3 8
- −16
- 805±40
- Palmer, Jacqueline
- 4 −10 −10 7 7
- +10
- 715±37
- Woods, Ursula
- 9 4 −5 5
- Carpenter, David
- Rating Change
739±53 + 51 = 790±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 863±48
- Lojek, John
- 4 −9 8 −3 7
- +14
- 718±35
- Sweet, Jenny
- 7 9 10
- +6
- 639±41
- Charlton, Justin
- 8 8 −9 9
- Charlton, Justin
- Rating Change
649±43 − 14 = 635±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 675±53
- Scurrah, Glen
- −11 4 −5 8 9
- −3
- 786±65
- Carpenter, David
- 8 8 −9 9
- −1
- 851±53
- Kelly, Gary
- 9 5 8
- Constantine, Phil
- Rating Change
841±36 − 7 = 834±32 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 745±36
- Midson, Roger
- −8 7 5 5
- −8
- 853±35
- Ferrar, Geoff
- 5 12 5
- −3
- 935±40
- Kim, James
- 6 7 5
- Coombe, David
- Rating Change
950±35 + 3 = 953±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 855±40
- Manning, Lynne
- 8 11 9
- −1
- 1229±110
- Stringer, Robert
- 5 8 2
- +1
- 720±40
- Bhargava, Sagar
- 12 5 2
- Deng, Weimin
- Rating Change
823±42 + 27 = 850±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 895±45
- Hodges, Neville
- 8 7 −11 8
- +10
- 825±74
- Young, Lorraine
- 7 7 9
- 0
- 483±44
- Midson, Suzanne
- 6 8 4
- Downham, Judith
- Rating Change
750±38 − 10 = 740±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 483±44
- Midson, Suzanne
- 7 7 2
- −7
- 775±64
- Young, Lorraine
- 7 6 3
- −3
- 875±39
- Hodges, Neville
- 6 10 10
- Ferrar, Geoff
- Rating Change
852±37 + 9 = 861±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 842±33
- Constantine, Phil
- 5 12 5
- −4
- 964±39
- MacKenzie, Nick
- 5 3 9
- +4
- 772±39
- Jeffries, Mark
- 8 −4 4 6
- Hodges, Neville
- Rating Change
891±45 − 12 = 879±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 744±37
- Downham, Judith
- 6 10 10
- −16
- 831±42
- Deng, Weimin
- 8 7 −11 8
- +1
- 644±44
- Rowell, Dennis
- 11 7 −7 9
- Holcomb, Kim
- Rating Change
1138±35 − 15 = 1123±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 931±42
- Sasse, Paul
- 4 3 2
- −16
- 970±34
- Mollineaux, Keith Phillip
- 5 −8 7 9
- −1
- 1306±46
- Bowden, Rob
- 3 10 7
- Horton, Barry
- Rating Change
1289±41 + 11 = 1300±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1290±43
- Massie, Roger
- 8 −5 −7 8 11
- 0
- 967±36
- McKay, Phillip
- 9 5 9
- 0
- 963±30
- Smith, Don
- 7 −8 3 4
- Huxtable, Claire
- Rating Change
993±37 − 14 = 979±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −8
- 1004±33
- Wong, Cheng
- 8 5 −9 6
- −3
- 1105±33
- Ahel, David
- 6 4 3
- −2
- 1127±36
- Joyce, Stephen
- 9 −8 9 9
- Jeffries, Mark
- Rating Change
764±41 + 2 = 766±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 748±36
- Midson, Roger
- 8 4 −3 −8 6
- −5
- 857±35
- Ferrar, Geoff
- 8 −4 4 6
- −2
- 938±40
- Kim, James
- 8 6 2
- Joyce, Stephen
- Rating Change
1128±37 + 1 = 1129±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 981±34
- Huxtable, Claire
- 9 −8 9 9
- −4
- 1235±41
- Long, Geoff G
- 7 3 1
- +2
- 966±47
- Simmons, Jon
- 3 7 1
- Kelly, Gary
- Rating Change
824±52 + 27 = 851±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 857±48
- Lojek, John
- 6 8 6
- +5
- 715±34
- Sweet, Jenny
- 3 8 −5 8
- +2
- 636±40
- Charlton, Justin
- 9 5 8
- Kim, James
- Rating Change
945±44 − 4 = 941±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 838±33
- Constantine, Phil
- 6 7 5
- −11
- 959±39
- MacKenzie, Nick
- 10 5 4
- +2
- 769±38
- Jeffries, Mark
- 8 6 2
- Langenberg, Adam
- Rating Change
1089±46 + 35 = 1124±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 1301±43
- Massie, Roger
- 6 6 −6 −2 7
- +4
- 970±36
- McKay, Phillip
- 8 8 9
- +3
- 965±30
- Smith, Don
- 7 7 4
- Lojek, John
- Rating Change
882±53 − 40 = 842±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 692±51
- Scurrah, Glen
- 10 4 2
- −27
- 760±53
- Carpenter, David
- 4 −9 8 −3 7
- −16
- 834±51
- Kelly, Gary
- 6 8 6
- Long, Geoff G
- Rating Change
1231±42 + 9 = 1240±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1133±36
- Joyce, Stephen
- 7 3 1
- +4
- 1111±34
- Ahel, David
- 9 5 6
- +1
- 1012±33
- Wong, Cheng
- 6 −7 7 6
- Loveless, Susan
- Rating Change
907±38 + 8 = 915±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 834±65
- Beswick, Anthony
- 5 5 8
- +3
- 804±40
- Spotswood, Mark
- 5 6 7
- MacKenzie, Nick
- Rating Change
953±40 + 15 = 968±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 952±43
- Kim, James
- 10 5 4
- +4
- 865±36
- Ferrar, Geoff
- 5 3 9
- +1
- 742±36
- Midson, Roger
- 10 6 5
- Manning, Lynne
- Rating Change
829±40 + 21 = 850±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 945±38
- Ashford, Graeme
- −7 7 10 6
- −4
- 950±34
- Coombe, David
- 8 11 9
- +8
- 812±38
- Bowden, Ian
- 9 2 4
- Massie, Roger
- Rating Change
1317±48 − 39 = 1278±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 987±35
- Bilsborough, Matt
- −8 3 7 9
- −27
- 1099±44
- Langenberg, Adam
- 6 6 −6 −2 7
- −12
- 1290±41
- Horton, Barry
- 8 −5 −7 8 11
- McKay, Phillip
- Rating Change
980±38 − 12 = 968±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 979±36
- Bilsborough, Matt
- 6 −8 6 −6 9
- −2
- 1122±46
- Langenberg, Adam
- 8 8 9
- 0
- 1301±42
- Horton, Barry
- 9 5 9
- Midson, Roger
- Rating Change
754±38 − 14 = 740±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 757±39
- Jeffries, Mark
- 8 4 −3 −8 6
- −4
- 831±33
- Constantine, Phil
- −8 7 5 5
- −1
- 966±39
- MacKenzie, Nick
- 10 6 5
- Midson, Suzanne
- Rating Change
487±45 − 5 = 482±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −3
- 639±45
- Rowell, Dennis
- 13 5 −6 5
- −1
- 741±36
- Downham, Judith
- 7 7 2
- 0
- 847±45
- Deng, Weimin
- 6 8 4
- Mollineaux, Keith Phillip
- Rating Change
966±36 + 20 = 986±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +16
- 1138±34
- Holcomb, Kim
- 5 −8 7 9
- −4
- 1074±31
- Bowerman, Judy
- −3 9 −14 9 8
- +7
- 960±36
- Peters, Stacey
- 6 −5 9 8
- Palmer, Jacqueline
- Rating Change
788±37 + 20 = 808±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 948±144
- Qu, Steve
- −12 9 8 −6 7
- +8
- 800±55
- Burke, David
- 4 −10 −10 7 7
- 0
- 543±43
- Berry, Julie
- 4 4 1
- Peters, Stacey
- Rating Change
952±37 + 0 = 952±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 941±43
- Sasse, Paul
- 9 6 −8 5
- −7
- 979±36
- Mollineaux, Keith Phillip
- 6 −5 9 8
- 0
- 1308±46
- Bowden, Rob
- 11 7 10
- Qu, Steve
- Rating Change
1485±234 − 672 = 813±91 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +37
- 709±35
- Woods, Ursula
- 3 10 −9 7
- −571
- 732±36
- Rowell, Janet
- −8 4 3 12
- −138
- 797±36
- Palmer, Jacqueline
- −12 9 8 −6 7
- Rowell, Dennis
- Rating Change
644±46 − 2 = 642±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 485±44
- Midson, Suzanne
- 13 5 −6 5
- −4
- 788±62
- Young, Lorraine
- −7 3 7 5
- −1
- 877±39
- Hodges, Neville
- 11 7 −7 9
- Rowell, Janet
- Rating Change
737±37 + 7 = 744±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 965±141
- Qu, Steve
- −8 4 3 12
- −7
- 769±49
- Burke, David
- −7 6 3 8
- +1
- 544±44
- Berry, Julie
- 4 5 5
- Sasse, Paul
- Rating Change
947±44 − 18 = 929±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −13
- 943±36
- Peters, Stacey
- 9 6 −8 5
- −3
- 1074±31
- Bowerman, Judy
- 7 9 6
- −2
- 1121±34
- Holcomb, Kim
- 4 3 2
- Scurrah, Glen
- Rating Change
696±59 − 10 = 686±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 641±41
- Charlton, Justin
- −11 4 −5 8 9
- −20
- 704±35
- Sweet, Jenny
- 4 −10 5 −4 5
- −5
- 836±46
- Lojek, John
- 10 4 2
- Simmons, Jon
- Rating Change
986±51 − 23 = 963±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 1005±33
- Wong, Cheng
- 3 3 3
- −5
- 1105±33
- Ahel, David
- 4 7 4
- −3
- 1127±35
- Joyce, Stephen
- 3 7 1
- Smith, Don
- Rating Change
972±32 − 8 = 964±30 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 979±36
- Bilsborough, Matt
- 4 7 5
- −1
- 1122±46
- Langenberg, Adam
- 7 7 4
- 0
- 1301±42
- Horton, Barry
- 7 −8 3 4
- Spotswood, Mark
- Rating Change
818±42 − 19 = 799±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −9
- 846±37
- Zhang, Jun
- 10 9 7
- −5
- 911±38
- Loveless, Susan
- 5 6 7
- −4
- 913±37
- Von Gehr, Joshua
- 9 7 14
- Stringer, Robert
- Rating Change
1222±113 + 12 = 1234±109 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 953±35
- Coombe, David
- 5 8 2
- +4
- 931±35
- Ashford, Graeme
- 8 6 9
- +1
- 804±36
- Bowden, Ian
- 8 7 6
- Sweet, Jenny
- Rating Change
715±36 − 1 = 714±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 706±54
- Scurrah, Glen
- 4 −10 5 −4 5
- −5
- 780±63
- Carpenter, David
- 7 9 10
- −2
- 849±53
- Kelly, Gary
- 3 8 −5 8
- Von Gehr, Joshua
- Rating Change
926±40 − 13 = 913±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 803±40
- Spotswood, Mark
- 9 7 14
- −17
- 777±62
- Beswick, Anthony
- 9 9 −8 −8 8
- Wong, Cheng
- Rating Change
998±34 + 12 = 1010±33 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 987±35
- Huxtable, Claire
- 8 5 −9 6
- −1
- 1239±40
- Long, Geoff G
- 6 −7 7 6
- +6
- 975±48
- Simmons, Jon
- 3 3 3
- Woods, Ursula
- Rating Change
713±37 − 8 = 705±34 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 545±44
- Berry, Julie
- 8 5 8
- −6
- 771±49
- Burke, David
- 9 4 −5 5
- −4
- 776±104
- Qu, Steve
- 3 10 −9 7
- Young, Lorraine
- Rating Change
792±79 + 6 = 798±61 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 748±37
- Downham, Judith
- 7 6 3
- −26
- 840±44
- Deng, Weimin
- 7 7 9
- +7
- 647±45
- Rowell, Dennis
- −7 3 7 5
- Zhang, Jun
- Rating Change
839±38 + 15 = 854±37 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 846±67
- Beswick, Anthony
- −7 7 4 5
- +7
- 808±40
- Spotswood, Mark
- 10 9 7
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 53. Matches: 78. Club: Northern Suburbs Table Tennis League. Province: TAS. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Turner, Fred. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 48532. Submitted: 2023-10-19 6:33 am EDT. Last processed: 2024-04-30 1:07 am EDT.