Minnesota Day Pong
2024-01-04
Detailed Report

• Alabi, Joe
• Rating Change
  1152​±28 + 19 = 1171​±28
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +7
• 1204​±29
• Chaney, Dave
• 5 8 9
• +6
• 1193​±59
• Kennedy, Dan
• 8 6 4
• +4
• 1135​±29
• Flickstein, Aaron
• −6 9 −5 5 2
• +2
• 1049​±27
• Haltarhuu, Chimgee
• 2 5 −12 7
• 0
• 947​±25
• Witz, Larry
• −9 −12 8 8 2
•  
• Avila, Katheleen
• Rating Change
  342​±62 + 16 = 358​±55
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +20
• 348​±81
• Shams, Ashley
• −12 8 −7 5 6
• −2
• 583​±31
• Wellington, David
• 5 9 8
• −1
• 619​±25
• Berneck, Mike
• 7 6 8
• −1
• 633​±30
• Scharstrom, Eddie
• 3 −4 9 3
•  
• Bann, Curt
• Rating Change
  765​±35 − 25 = 740​±28
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −11
• 701​±25
• DeHamer, Dan
• −8 6 −10 6 9
• −7
• 721​±25
• Kosek, Steve
• −5 10 −8 3 8
• −5
• 762​±32
• Ransom, Eugene
• −8 −6 4 7 7
• −2
• 850​±27
• Montgomery, Paul
• −9 5 −9 8 9
• −1
• 936​±28
• Thacker, Jay
• 6 7 2
•  
• Berneck, Mike
• Rating Change
  629​±26 − 10 = 619​±25
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• 0
• 360​±55
• Avila, Katheleen
• 7 6 8
• −6
• 575​±32
• Wellington, David
• 7 9 −8 −2 9
• 0
• 314​±78
• Shams, Ashley
• −5 0 2 8
• −4
• 627​±30
• Scharstrom, Eddie
• 6 −10 −8 7 7
•  
• Chaney, Dave
• Rating Change
  1193​±27 + 3 = 1196​±26
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +4
• 1187​±59
• Kennedy, Dan
• 4 −4 5 −9 4
• −6
• 1166​±28
• Alabi, Joe
• 5 8 9
• +3
• 1133​±29
• Flickstein, Aaron
• 7 7 −4 5
• +1
• 1048​±27
• Haltarhuu, Chimgee
• 4 4 5
• 0
• 947​±25
• Witz, Larry
• 7 9 5
•  
• DeHamer, Dan
• Rating Change
  700​±26 + 7 = 707​±24
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 747​±28
• Bann, Curt
• −8 6 −10 6 9
• −3
• 765​±32
• Ransom, Eugene
• 3 4 −5 9
• +5
• 732​±25
• Kosek, Steve
• 12 −10 −11 8 4
• −1
• 852​±27
• Montgomery, Paul
• −8 5 3 3
• 0
• 936​±28
• Thacker, Jay
• 4 5 6
•  
• Flickstein, Aaron
• Rating Change
  1137​±31 − 10 = 1127​±28
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +3
• 1049​±27
• Haltarhuu, Chimgee
• −5 8 4 7
• −5
• 1147​±57
• Kennedy, Dan
• 3 10 8
• +1
• 947​±25
• Witz, Larry
• 1 6 8
• −5
• 1168​±28
• Alabi, Joe
• −6 9 −5 5 2
• −3
• 1194​±26
• Chaney, Dave
• 7 7 −4 5
•  
• Haltarhuu, Chimgee
• Rating Change
  1041​±28 + 6 = 1047​±26
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 1205​±57
• Kennedy, Dan
• 4 −10 4 6
• −3
• 1127​±29
• Flickstein, Aaron
• −5 8 4 7
• +2
• 949​±26
• Witz, Larry
• −8 2 8 12
• −1
• 1170​±28
• Alabi, Joe
• 2 5 −12 7
• −1
• 1196​±26
• Chaney, Dave
• 4 4 5
•  
• Kennedy, Dan
• Rating Change
  1283​±84 − 117 = 1166​±54
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +19
• 1131​±28
• Flickstein, Aaron
• 3 10 8
• −81
• 1038​±27
• Haltarhuu, Chimgee
• 4 −10 4 6
• +2
• 947​±25
• Witz, Larry
• 7 8 6
• −37
• 1165​±27
• Alabi, Joe
• 8 6 4
• −21
• 1191​±26
• Chaney, Dave
• 4 −4 5 −9 4
•  
• Kosek, Steve
• Rating Change
  723​±26 + 4 = 727​±25
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 780​±35
• Ransom, Eugene
• −6 −7 7 8 7
• −5
• 702​±25
• DeHamer, Dan
• 12 −10 −11 8 4
• +5
• 746​±28
• Bann, Curt
• −5 10 −8 3 8
• −1
• 851​±27
• Montgomery, Paul
• 5 9 −6 2
• 0
• 936​±28
• Thacker, Jay
• 6 −9 4 −9 7
•  
• Montgomery, Paul
• Rating Change
  859​±28 − 7 = 852​±27
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 742​±28
• Bann, Curt
• −9 5 −9 8 9
• −9
• 757​±32
• Ransom, Eugene
• −3 7 7 7
• +2
• 728​±25
• Kosek, Steve
• 5 9 −6 2
• −3
• 934​±28
• Thacker, Jay
• 4 −7 5 5
• +1
• 708​±24
• DeHamer, Dan
• −8 5 3 3
•  
• Ransom, Eugene
• Rating Change
  756​±35 + 12 = 768​±32
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +13
• 861​±27
• Montgomery, Paul
• −3 7 7 7
• −10
• 722​±25
• Kosek, Steve
• −6 −7 7 8 7
• +7
• 745​±28
• Bann, Curt
• −8 −6 4 7 7
• −1
• 936​±28
• Thacker, Jay
• 6 −8 1 3
• +5
• 710​±25
• DeHamer, Dan
• 3 4 −5 9
•  
• Scharstrom, Eddie
• Rating Change
  636​±31 − 3 = 633​±30
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 623​±25
• Berneck, Mike
• 6 −10 −8 7 7
• −9
• 574​±32
• Wellington, David
• −8 6 8 −9 8
• 0
• 360​±55
• Avila, Katheleen
• 3 −4 9 3
• 0
• 314​±78
• Shams, Ashley
• 6 8 8
•  
• Shams, Ashley
• Rating Change
  362​±88 − 50 = 312​±77
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −44
• 338​±61
• Avila, Katheleen
• −12 8 −7 5 6
• −3
• 583​±31
• Wellington, David
• 6 4 5
• −2
• 619​±25
• Berneck, Mike
• −5 0 2 8
• −1
• 633​±30
• Scharstrom, Eddie
• 6 8 8
•  
• Thacker, Jay
• Rating Change
  931​±29 + 5 = 936​±28
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +3
• 855​±27
• Montgomery, Paul
• 4 −7 5 5
• +1
• 770​±32
• Ransom, Eugene
• 6 −8 1 3
• +1
• 740​±28
• Bann, Curt
• 6 7 2
• +1
• 727​±25
• Kosek, Steve
• 6 −9 4 −9 7
• 0
• 707​±24
• DeHamer, Dan
• 4 5 6
•  
• Wellington, David
• Rating Change
  562​±33 + 22 = 584​±31
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +11
• 643​±31
• Scharstrom, Eddie
• −8 6 8 −9 8
• +9
• 625​±25
• Berneck, Mike
• 7 9 −8 −2 9
• +1
• 361​±55
• Avila, Katheleen
• 5 9 8
• 0
• 316​±78
• Shams, Ashley
• 6 4 5
•  
• Witz, Larry
• Rating Change
  950​±26 − 4 = 946​±25
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −2
• 1045​±27
• Haltarhuu, Chimgee
• −8 2 8 12
• −1
• 1129​±28
• Flickstein, Aaron
• 1 6 8
• 0
• 1164​±54
• Kennedy, Dan
• 7 8 6
• 0
• 1172​±29
• Alabi, Joe
• −9 −12 8 8 2
• 0
• 1197​±26
• Chaney, Dave
• 7 9 5

• Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
• Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment

Players: 17. Matches: 40. Club: Table Tennis Minnesota. State: Minnesota (MN). Country: United States (USA). Director: Sabas, Joseph. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 49480. Submitted: 2024-01-04 3:06 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-05-05 10:48 pm EDT.