Sunshine & District TTA 2024 Wed S1 - Round 8
2024-04-17
Detailed Report

• Anstey, Leonie
• Rating Change
  638​±47 − 19 = 619​±41
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −14
• 621​±49
• Vomaravelli, Charan Sai
• 7 6 11
• −2
• 795​±49
• Prasanna Kumar, Aatmika
• 6 5 4
• −1
• 831​±43
• Bhattacharya, Susmit
• 7 8 9
•  
• Anstey, Stephen
• Rating Change
  1215​±32 + 11 = 1226​±30
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +8
• 1238​±42
• Kaszkiel, Martin
• 8 −4 7 15
• +2
• 1111​±40
• Vomaravelli, Krishna Rao
• 7 3 −10 10
• +1
• 1033​±36
• Khan, Naeem
• 6 9 10
•  
• Anstey, Zachary
• Rating Change
  1857​±37 + 6 = 1863​±36
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +5
• 1781​±50
• Le, Hoang Giang
• 8 9 9
• +1
• 1626​±47
• Tran, An Van
• 7 −9 5 9
• 0
• 1515​±35
• Ngo, Be Hoang
• 3 7 10
•  
• Antoniou, Peter
• Rating Change
  1401​±27 − 1 = 1400​±26
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +1
• 1247​±40
• Nguyen, Son Hong
• 6 9 3
• −3
• 1461​±39
• Nguyen, Alex Anh
• 3 14 −5 5
• +1
• 1244​±34
• Nguyen, Thi Ngoc
• 9 7 2
•  
• Ballestrino, Jake
• Rating Change
  1443​±39 − 10 = 1433​±36
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −6
• 1501​±49
• Nguyen, Duy D
• 9 −3 −6 7 8
• −3
• 1559​±30
• Guo, Qi Yuan
• 6 −8 8 6
• −1
• 1672​±39
• She, Erdong
• 4 −9 10 9
•  
• Besa, Guilzam
• Rating Change
  1482​±58 − 31 = 1451​±51
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −26
• 1437​±40
• Subramaniam, Harish
• 2 −9 −6 9 6
• −4
• 1630​±29
• Glynn, Mark D
• 4 3 3
• −2
• 1672​±32
• Bouchaud, Jack
• 7 7 6
•  
• Bhattacharya, Susmit
• Rating Change
  850​±46 − 16 = 834​±42
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +1
• 622​±42
• Anstey, Leonie
• 7 8 9
• −16
• 813​±42
• Pena, Migs
• 12 9 −7 11
• −1
• 1064​±50
• Nicholls, Scott
• 8 −8 7 8
•  
• Bouchaud, Jack
• Rating Change
  1665​±32 + 7 = 1672​±32
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +5
• 1615​±38
• Tran, Tuan
• 11 5 8
• +2
• 1516​±35
• Pham, David
• 7 7 6
• +1
• 1453​±52
• Besa, Guilzam
• 7 7 6
•  
• Brackley, Colin
• Rating Change
  1100​±39 + 15 = 1115​±36
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +13
• 1154​±38
• Hill, Wesley
• −7 3 9 −5 9
• −5
• 1182​±46
• Canillo, Orlando
• −10 7 7 6
• +8
• 1087​±37
• Cvijeticanin, Goran
• 7 −6 7 11
•  
• Cai, Ann
• Rating Change
  702​±71 − 45 = 657​±59
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −37
• 640​±48
• Letran, Dan
• −4 8 8 10
• −6
• 830​±34
• Mendes, Andrew
• 6 10 5
• −2
• 906​±47
• Truong, Henry
• 9 6 7
•  
• Canillo, Orlando
• Rating Change
  1169​±46 + 22 = 1191​±46
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +12
• 1156​±30
• Tatikonda, Dhatri
• 4 7 9
• +8
• 1122​±40
• Brackley, Colin
• −10 7 7 6
• +2
• 991​±45
• Sharma, Hasit
• −11 7 5 8
•  
• Cvijeticanin, Goran
• Rating Change
  1089​±40 − 10 = 1079​±36
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +5
• 995​±46
• Sharma, Hasit
• −10 4 10 8
• −9
• 1107​±36
• Brackley, Colin
• 7 −6 7 11
• −6
• 1147​±29
• Tatikonda, Dhatri
• 8 11 −11 4
•  
• Elliget, Martin
• Rating Change
  1195​±35 + 0 = 1195​±33
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 1211​±34
• Lindberg, Eric
• 12 −6 8 10
• −10
• 1165​±40
• Nguyen, Dien
• 8 10 9
• +1
• 959​±38
• Hoang, Kelvin
• 5 5 10
•  
• Fernandez, Brubeck
• Rating Change
  1047​±49 + 28 = 1075​±46
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +28
• 1216​±34
• Lindberg, Eric
• 14 8 7
• −5
• 1174​±42
• Nguyen, Dien
• −8 2 7 5
• +6
• 963​±39
• Hoang, Kelvin
• 8 6 10
•  
• Glynn, Mark D
• Rating Change
  1623​±29 + 8 = 1631​±29
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +5
• 1618​±39
• Tran, Tuan
• −9 9 9 8
• +2
• 1518​±35
• Pham, David
• 2 13 −9 5
• +1
• 1455​±52
• Besa, Guilzam
• 4 3 3
•  
• Gong, Connor
• Rating Change
  1308​±39 − 24 = 1284​±35
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −13
• 1247​±36
• Le, Tin
• −8 8 7 9
• −8
• 1302​±33
• Luu, Ly H
• 12 3 8
• −2
• 1431​±36
• Vo, Phong Tan
• 10 8 −9 5
•  
• Gong, Jim
• Rating Change
  1283​±39 − 2 = 1281​±35
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +11
• 1318​±33
• Luu, Ly H
• 9 8 −9 1
• −12
• 1248​±36
• Le, Tin
• 3 3 5
• −2
• 1432​±36
• Vo, Phong Tan
• 5 −10 4 −8 6
•  
• Guo, Qi Yuan
• Rating Change
  1556​±30 + 5 = 1561​±29
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +3
• 1483​±28
• Muhammad, Aoun
• 11 −4 7 8
• 0
• 2050​±60
• Tran, Viet Anh
• 3 9 4
• +2
• 1435​±36
• Ballestrino, Jake
• 6 −8 8 6
•  
• Hagoel, Tamir
• Rating Change
  1383​±27 − 2 = 1381​±25
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 1296​±32
• Lu, Hsin
• 12 11 5
• −6
• 1354​±33
• Lam, Kin Kah
• 6 7 8
• +2
• 1292​±32
• Lu, Pin-Yi
• −8 7 −7 8 7
•  
• Hill, Wesley
• Rating Change
  1164​±42 − 23 = 1141​±36
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 991​±45
• Sharma, Hasit
• −9 −8 9 7 1
• −15
• 1103​±36
• Brackley, Colin
• −7 3 9 −5 9
• −10
• 1145​±29
• Tatikonda, Dhatri
• 6 −8 7 6
•  
• Hoang, Kelvin
• Rating Change
  950​±41 + 9 = 959​±38
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +14
• 1003​±35
• Qian, Zoe
• 9 −8 8 6
• −4
• 1069​±47
• Fernandez, Brubeck
• 8 6 10
• −1
• 1195​±33
• Elliget, Martin
• 5 5 10
•  
• Huggett, Graham W
• Rating Change
  886​±32 + 2 = 888​±30
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 964​±71
• Nguyen, Thuy Anh
• 8 −6 8 6
• −7
• 888​±35
• Vairamuttu, Kumar
• 8 8 −8 7
• 0
• 551​±64
• Price, Ben
• 5 8 7
•  
• Kaszkiel, Martin
• Rating Change
  1236​±42 − 10 = 1226​±38
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 1045​±31
• Smith, Steve Aaron
• 11 3 5
• −13
• 1219​±31
• Anstey, Stephen
• 8 −4 7 15
• 0
• 912​±36
• Konara, Warrun
• 9 5 8
•  
• Khan, Naeem
• Rating Change
  1038​±38 − 7 = 1031​±35
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +3
• 915​±36
• Konara, Warrun
• 7 3 5
• −10
• 1038​±30
• Smith, Steve Aaron
• 9 11 8
• −1
• 1225​±31
• Anstey, Stephen
• 6 9 10
•  
• Konara, Warrun
• Rating Change
  916​±37 − 5 = 911​±36
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −3
• 1028​±36
• Khan, Naeem
• 7 3 5
• −1
• 1105​±38
• Vomaravelli, Krishna Rao
• 6 5 7
• 0
• 1225​±38
• Kaszkiel, Martin
• 9 5 8
•  
• Lam, Kin Kah
• Rating Change
  1366​±36 − 2 = 1364​±32
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 1388​±28
• Hagoel, Tamir
• 6 7 8
• −14
• 1237​±31
• Pham, Tuan
• 10 9 9
• +3
• 1247​±29
• Tran, Thanh Luu
• 9 −9 10 8
•  
• Latta, Gordon
• Rating Change
  1308​±34 + 27 = 1335​±34
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +14
• 1451​±40
• Vo, Phong Tan
• 9 8 −9 −3 7
• +8
• 1317​±33
• Luu, Ly H
• 6 −11 2 4
• +5
• 1267​±41
• Le, Tin
• 11 −9 −10 9 12
•  
• Le, Hoang Giang
• Rating Change
  1778​±51 − 6 = 1772​±46
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 1574​±44
• Poplawski, William
• 7 −7 4 −8 2
• −9
• 1858​±37
• Anstey, Zachary
• 8 9 9
• +1
• 1510​±38
• Poplawski, Mark
• 1 8 9
•  
• Le, Tin
• Rating Change
  1241​±39 + 19 = 1260​±36
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +12
• 1297​±36
• Gong, Connor
• −8 8 7 9
• −5
• 1330​±34
• Latta, Gordon
• 11 −9 −10 9 12
• +11
• 1292​±37
• Gong, Jim
• 3 3 5
•  
• Letran, Dan
• Rating Change
  623​±50 + 34 = 657​±49
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +20
• 686​±63
• Cai, Ann
• −4 8 8 10
• −1
• 897​±38
• Refuerzo, Edwin
• 3 5 9
• +16
• 652​±38
• Nguyen, Bich Mong
• −8 1 8 9
•  
• Lindberg, Eric
• Rating Change
  1226​±37 − 25 = 1201​±33
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +1
• 992​±35
• Qian, Zoe
• 4 9 5
• −16
• 1047​±45
• Fernandez, Brubeck
• 14 8 7
• −9
• 1186​±33
• Elliget, Martin
• 12 −6 8 10
•  
• Lu, Hsin
• Rating Change
  1302​±35 − 9 = 1293​±32
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +5
• 1253​±32
• Pham, Tuan
• 8 10 5
• −11
• 1237​±29
• Tran, Thanh Luu
• 11 7 8
• −3
• 1380​±26
• Hagoel, Tamir
• 12 11 5
•  
• Lu, Pin-Yi
• Rating Change
  1297​±34 − 8 = 1289​±31
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +5
• 1249​±29
• Tran, Thanh Luu
• −2 8 −6 3 6
• −11
• 1240​±31
• Pham, Tuan
• −8 4 3 6
• −3
• 1380​±26
• Hagoel, Tamir
• −8 7 −7 8 7
•  
• Luu, Ly H
• Rating Change
  1319​±35 − 10 = 1309​±32
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +7
• 1292​±36
• Gong, Connor
• 12 3 8
• −11
• 1269​±36
• Gong, Jim
• 9 8 −9 1
• −7
• 1326​±34
• Latta, Gordon
• 6 −11 2 4
•  
• Marko, Steven
• Rating Change
  597​±41 + 8 = 605​±40
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +8
• 573​±67
• Price, Ben
• 9 6 9
• 0
• 896​±34
• Vairamuttu, Kumar
• 2 7 9
• 0
• 921​±64
• Nguyen, Thuy Anh
• 7 3 5
•  
• Mendes, Andrew
• Rating Change
  834​±36 − 3 = 831​±34
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 659​±61
• Cai, Ann
• 6 10 5
• −6
• 891​±38
• Refuerzo, Edwin
• −7 9 −8 7 5
• +1
• 643​±37
• Nguyen, Bich Mong
• 4 5 8
•  
• Muhammad, Aoun
• Rating Change
  1490​±29 − 9 = 1481​±28
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −5
• 1496​±49
• Nguyen, Duy D
• 6 6 6
• −3
• 1558​±30
• Guo, Qi Yuan
• 11 −4 7 8
• −1
• 1671​±40
• She, Erdong
• 5 1 8
•  
• Ngo, Be Hoang
• Rating Change
  1513​±38 + 2 = 1515​±35
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +9
• 1520​±39
• Poplawski, Mark
• 6 −3 5 −5 4
• −6
• 1564​±42
• Poplawski, William
• 9 6 −8 −7 3
• 0
• 1863​±36
• Anstey, Zachary
• 3 7 10
•  
• Nguyen, Alex Anh
• Rating Change
  1455​±39 + 11 = 1466​±39
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +7
• 1403​±26
• Antoniou, Peter
• 3 14 −5 5
• +3
• 1323​±39
• Tran, Hiep Van
• 3 3 1
• +2
• 1283​±39
• Truong, Oanh
• 7 6 −9 3
•  
• Nguyen, Bich Mong
• Rating Change
  654​±38 − 12 = 642​±37
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −10
• 642​±49
• Letran, Dan
• −8 1 8 9
• −1
• 832​±34
• Mendes, Andrew
• 4 5 8
• −1
• 908​±47
• Truong, Henry
• 7 −9 8 5
•  
• Nguyen, Dien
• Rating Change
  1159​±41 + 20 = 1179​±42
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +14
• 1206​±36
• Elliget, Martin
• 8 10 9
• +5
• 1084​±53
• Fernandez, Brubeck
• −8 2 7 5
• +2
• 993​±35
• Qian, Zoe
• 11 −3 5 −9 7
•  
• Nguyen, Duy D
• Rating Change
  1485​±50 + 25 = 1510​±48
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +16
• 1486​±28
• Muhammad, Aoun
• 6 6 6
• 0
• 2050​±60
• Tran, Viet Anh
• 5 8 11
• +9
• 1439​±37
• Ballestrino, Jake
• 9 −3 −6 7 8
•  
• Nguyen, Son Hong
• Rating Change
  1238​±43 + 6 = 1244​±39
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 1294​±40
• Truong, Oanh
• −5 7 −6 9 4
• −7
• 1315​±37
• Tran, Hiep Van
• −4 −12 5 9 6
• −2
• 1399​±26
• Antoniou, Peter
• 6 9 3
•  
• Nguyen, Thi Ngoc
• Rating Change
  1237​±36 + 5 = 1242​±33
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +11
• 1295​±40
• Truong, Oanh
• 12 9 −7 3
• −5
• 1315​±37
• Tran, Hiep Van
• 8 3 7
• −2
• 1399​±26
• Antoniou, Peter
• 9 7 2
•  
• Nguyen, Thuy Anh
• Rating Change
  1006​±87 − 85 = 921​±64
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +1
• 605​±40
• Marko, Steven
• 7 3 5
• −65
• 879​±31
• Huggett, Graham W
• 8 −6 8 6
• −20
• 996​±36
• Wu, Emrys
• 5 −11 −7 6 6
•  
• Nicholls, Scott
• Rating Change
  1063​±50 + 2 = 1065​±50
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +1
• 834​±43
• Bhattacharya, Susmit
• 8 −8 7 8
• +1
• 800​±49
• Prasanna Kumar, Aatmika
• 8 8 7
• 0
• 637​±46
• Vomaravelli, Charan Sai
• 3 3 3
•  
• Pena, Migs
• Rating Change
  799​±42 + 27 = 826​±43
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +15
• 850​±45
• Bhattacharya, Susmit
• 12 9 −7 11
• +11
• 819​±55
• Prasanna Kumar, Aatmika
• −10 −10 11 8 10
• +2
• 641​±48
• Vomaravelli, Charan Sai
• 6 −3 5 8
•  
• Pham, David
• Rating Change
  1515​±37 + 0 = 1515​±34
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +5
• 1456​±40
• Subramaniam, Harish
• 9 6 5
• −3
• 1630​±29
• Glynn, Mark D
• 2 13 −9 5
• −2
• 1672​±32
• Bouchaud, Jack
• 7 7 6
•  
• Pham, Tuan
• Rating Change
  1232​±32 + 16 = 1248​±30
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +12
• 1378​±36
• Lam, Kin Kah
• 10 9 9
• −4
• 1288​±32
• Lu, Hsin
• 8 10 5
• +9
• 1298​±32
• Lu, Pin-Yi
• −8 4 3 6
•  
• Poplawski, Mark
• Rating Change
  1525​±41 − 17 = 1508​±38
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −12
• 1505​±36
• Ngo, Be Hoang
• 6 −3 5 −5 4
• −4
• 1617​±48
• Tran, An Van
• 4 4 4
• −1
• 1771​±46
• Le, Hoang Giang
• 1 8 9
•  
• Poplawski, William
• Rating Change
  1548​±43 + 24 = 1572​±42
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +18
• 1649​±51
• Tran, An Van
• 8 −8 5 −9 9
• −1
• 1770​±46
• Le, Hoang Giang
• 7 −7 4 −8 2
• +8
• 1522​±38
• Ngo, Be Hoang
• 9 6 −8 −7 3
•  
• Prasanna Kumar, Aatmika
• Rating Change
  818​±56 − 18 = 800​±49
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +3
• 622​±42
• Anstey, Leonie
• 6 5 4
• −20
• 815​±42
• Pena, Migs
• −10 −10 11 8 10
• −1
• 1065​±50
• Nicholls, Scott
• 8 8 7
•  
• Price, Ben
• Rating Change
  574​±68 − 23 = 551​±64
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −23
• 597​±41
• Marko, Steven
• 9 6 9
• −1
• 888​±31
• Huggett, Graham W
• 5 8 7
• 0
• 1003​±36
• Wu, Emrys
• 6 6 4
•  
• Qian, Zoe
• Rating Change
  1005​±36 − 14 = 991​±34
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −12
• 944​±39
• Hoang, Kelvin
• 9 −8 8 6
• −1
• 1175​±42
• Nguyen, Dien
• 11 −3 5 −9 7
• −1
• 1201​±34
• Lindberg, Eric
• 4 9 5
•  
• Refuerzo, Edwin
• Rating Change
  903​±44 − 5 = 898​±38
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 838​±36
• Mendes, Andrew
• −7 9 −8 7 5
• −12
• 894​±47
• Truong, Henry
• −5 9 10 10
• +1
• 661​±51
• Letran, Dan
• 3 5 9
•  
• Sharma, Hasit
• Rating Change
  1002​±49 − 15 = 987​±44
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −9
• 1074​±37
• Cvijeticanin, Goran
• −10 4 10 8
• −4
• 1139​±37
• Hill, Wesley
• −9 −8 9 7 1
• −2
• 1187​±46
• Canillo, Orlando
• −11 7 5 8
•  
• She, Erdong
• Rating Change
  1670​±40 + 3 = 1673​±39
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 1481​±28
• Muhammad, Aoun
• 5 1 8
• 0
• 2050​±60
• Tran, Viet Anh
• 8 5 11
• +1
• 1433​±36
• Ballestrino, Jake
• 4 −9 10 9
•  
• Smith, Steve Aaron
• Rating Change
  1044​±35 + 0 = 1044​±30
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 1040​±37
• Khan, Naeem
• 9 11 8
• −5
• 1100​±39
• Vomaravelli, Krishna Rao
• −7 8 3 3
• −1
• 1224​±38
• Kaszkiel, Martin
• 11 3 5
•  
• Subramaniam, Harish
• Rating Change
  1446​±43 + 2 = 1448​±39
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +12
• 1472​±54
• Besa, Guilzam
• 2 −9 −6 9 6
• −7
• 1510​±35
• Pham, David
• 9 6 5
• −2
• 1606​±37
• Tran, Tuan
• 10 5 7
•  
• Tatikonda, Dhatri
• Rating Change
  1146​±30 + 5 = 1151​±29
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 1151​±38
• Hill, Wesley
• 6 −8 7 6
• −5
• 1179​±45
• Canillo, Orlando
• 4 7 9
• +3
• 1085​±37
• Cvijeticanin, Goran
• 8 11 −11 4
•  
• Tran, An Van
• Rating Change
  1646​±54 − 22 = 1624​±47
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 1513​±39
• Poplawski, Mark
• 4 4 4
• −27
• 1555​±41
• Poplawski, William
• 8 −8 5 −9 9
• −1
• 1862​±36
• Anstey, Zachary
• 7 −9 5 9
•  
• Tran, Hiep Van
• Rating Change
  1313​±39 + 8 = 1321​±37
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +6
• 1252​±41
• Nguyen, Son Hong
• −4 −12 5 9 6
• −3
• 1464​±39
• Nguyen, Alex Anh
• 3 3 1
• +5
• 1247​±34
• Nguyen, Thi Ngoc
• 8 3 7
•  
• Tran, Thanh Luu
• Rating Change
  1243​±30 + 2 = 1245​±28
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +8
• 1302​±33
• Lu, Hsin
• 11 7 8
• −4
• 1283​±32
• Lu, Pin-Yi
• −2 8 −6 3 6
• −2
• 1361​±33
• Lam, Kin Kah
• 9 −9 10 8
•  
• Tran, Tuan
• Rating Change
  1625​±44 − 16 = 1609​±36
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 1451​±39
• Subramaniam, Harish
• 10 5 7
• −12
• 1627​±29
• Glynn, Mark D
• −9 9 9 8
• −6
• 1668​±32
• Bouchaud, Jack
• 11 5 8
•  
• Tran, Viet Anh
• Rating Change
  2050​±60 + 0 = 2050​±60
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• 0
• 1673​±39
• She, Erdong
• 8 5 11
• 0
• 1561​±29
• Guo, Qi Yuan
• 3 9 4
• 0
• 1511​±48
• Nguyen, Duy D
• 5 8 11
•  
• Truong, Henry
• Rating Change
  891​±48 + 17 = 908​±47
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +16
• 910​±45
• Refuerzo, Edwin
• −5 9 10 10
• +1
• 657​±60
• Cai, Ann
• 9 6 7
• +1
• 642​±37
• Nguyen, Bich Mong
• 7 −9 8 5
•  
• Truong, Oanh
• Rating Change
  1314​±43 − 34 = 1280​±38
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• −18
• 1229​±41
• Nguyen, Son Hong
• −5 7 −6 9 4
• −15
• 1231​±34
• Nguyen, Thi Ngoc
• 12 9 −7 3
• −2
• 1464​±39
• Nguyen, Alex Anh
• 7 6 −9 3
•  
• Vairamuttu, Kumar
• Rating Change
  892​±36 + 5 = 897​±34
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +8
• 895​±31
• Huggett, Graham W
• 8 8 −8 7
• −3
• 1000​±37
• Wu, Emrys
• 10 7 2
• 0
• 606​±40
• Marko, Steven
• 2 7 9
•  
• Vo, Phong Tan
• Rating Change
  1446​±40 − 12 = 1434​±35
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +2
• 1287​±35
• Gong, Connor
• 10 8 −9 5
• −17
• 1321​±33
• Latta, Gordon
• 9 8 −9 −3 7
• +2
• 1282​±35
• Gong, Jim
• 5 −10 4 −8 6
•  
• Vomaravelli, Charan Sai
• Rating Change
  624​±50 + 13 = 637​±47
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +16
• 633​±44
• Anstey, Leonie
• 7 6 11
• −3
• 824​±43
• Pena, Migs
• 6 −3 5 8
• 0
• 1066​±50
• Nicholls, Scott
• 3 3 3
•  
• Vomaravelli, Krishna Rao
• Rating Change
  1102​±41 + 5 = 1107​±38
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +7
• 1049​±35
• Smith, Steve Aaron
• −7 8 3 3
• −4
• 1224​±31
• Anstey, Stephen
• 7 3 −10 10
• +1
• 913​±36
• Konara, Warrun
• 6 5 7
•  
• Wu, Emrys
• Rating Change
  992​±36 + 9 = 1001​±36
• Wins
• Losses
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• Point
  Change
• Opponent’s
  Rating
• Opponent
• Score
• +5
• 943​±70
• Nguyen, Thuy Anh
• 5 −11 −7 6 6
• +4
• 900​±35
• Vairamuttu, Kumar
• 10 7 2
• 0
• 551​±64
• Price, Ben
• 6 6 4

• Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
• Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment

Players: 72. Matches: 108. Club: Sunshine & District Table Tennis Association. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Trang, Alan. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 50736. Submitted: 2024-04-18 9:01 am EDT. Revised: 2024-04-18 9:10 am EDT. Last processed: 2024-05-07 10:35 pm EDT.