MIT Fall Open 2009
2009-11-07
Detailed Report
- Bockoven, Chase
- Rating Change
1370±91 + 130 = 1500±90 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +118
- 1833±77
- Sharma, Rajeev
- 8 7 −8 16
- −2
- 1728±47
- Varshney, Pratibha
- 12 7 −3 3
- +16
- 1326±121
- Gore, Nelson
- −3 12 8 8
- −2
- 1785±110
- Ooi, Choon Wei
- 6 9 7
- 0
- 1977±47
- Wu, Alison
- 9 4 14
- 0
- 2017±65
- Hu, HY
- 7 5 9
- Bockoven, Connor
- Rating Change
1525±84 + 118 = 1643±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +87
- 1869±39
- Fu, Xinwen
- 7 6 9
- −10
- 1726±86
- Morris, Harold
- 6 −9 −9 10 9
- +32
- 1592±63
- Kwong, William
- −7 −9 6 8 2
- −2
- 1815±49
- Shih, Chi-Jen
- −5 8 7 8
- +12
- 1496±82
- Gao, Brian
- 3 8 8
- 0
- 1971±73
- Kirsten, Markus
- 5 9 4
- 0
- 1049±77
- Cao, Frank
- 3 5 5
- 0
- 2017±66
- Hu, HY
- 5 6 7
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- Rating Change
1358±108 + 14 = 1372±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +88
- 1849±10
- Stown, Greg
- 4 7 13
- −46
- 1383±82
- Schrimpf, Paul
- 2 7 15
- +2
- 1076±46
- Iskepally, Kalyan
- 3 3 5
- −17
- 1448±84
- Gao, Brian
- 5 8 5
- +2
- 1052±78
- Cao, Frank
- 5 8 6
- −9
- 1505±135
- Muramatsu, Wataru
- 8 10 −6 7
- −5
- 1531±47
- Bondarev, Alex
- 8 6 8
- 0
- 1728±47
- Varshney, Pratibha
- 7 7 7
- 0
- 1746±79
- Sharma, Rajeev
- 5 −6 10 −4 4
- 0
- 1849±39
- Fu, Xinwen
- 3 5 8
- Bondarev, Alex
- Rating Change
1570±50 − 31 = 1539±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1490±83
- Gao, Brian
- 5 13 11
- −37
- 1043±46
- Iskepally, Kalyan
- 3 7 −14 9
- +6
- 1425±88
- Schrimpf, Paul
- 10 −6 14 8
- −14
- 1538±61
- Kwong, William
- 9 9 8
- +2
- 1334±56
- Shea, Richard
- 4 5 4
- +2
- 1331±76
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- 8 6 8
- Cao, Frank
- Rating Change
1146±92 − 105 = 1041±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −65
- 900±147
- Li, Kai
- 9 5 5
- −36
- 1056±94
- Wang, George
- 6 −13 4 6
- −3
- 1317±77
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- 5 8 6
- 0
- 1555±71
- Landry, Albert
- 7 8 6
- 0
- 1635±79
- Bockoven, Connor
- 3 5 5
- 0
- 1735±83
- Morris, Harold
- 5 7 9
- 0
- 1747±79
- Sharma, Rajeev
- 4 7 6
- 0
- 1848±10
- Stown, Greg
- 4 5 3
- 0
- 2017±65
- Hu, HY
- 7 2 3
- Chen, Yan
- Rating Change
1100±200 + 51 = 1151±98 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +100
- 1100±145
- Maisel, Marc
- −11 −9 6 7 5
- −75
- 1247±84
- Li, Ling
- 6 5 6
- +30
- 986±164
- Feng, Yi
- 9 6 8
- −16
- 1348±93
- Ozay, Necmiye
- 9 3 4
- +17
- 937±156
- Frazier, George
- 8 7 8
- −6
- 1429±111
- Oltmanns, Marilena
- 3 6 −6 6
- 0
- 1728±47
- Varshney, Pratibha
- 5 9 4
- Cohen, Marcio
- Rating Change
1241±137 − 166 = 1075±103 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −154
- 1008±78
- Hershenow, Barry
- −7 11 9 7
- −9
- 1344±47
- Wong, Peter
- 4 7 7
- −2
- 1465±88
- Selvin, Lawrence
- −12 5 9 4
- Croitoru, Dorian
- Rating Change
1165±107 − 122 = 1043±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 868±80
- Slepchuk, Alec
- 5 7 4
- −82
- 1034±76
- Halliday, Kim
- 8 6 8
- −51
- 1037±44
- Reed, Robert
- 8 8 9
- Feng, Yi
- Rating Change
1100±200 − 140 = 960±149 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −126
- 1091±114
- Chen, Yan
- 9 6 8
- −9
- 1348±93
- Ozay, Necmiye
- 8 6 8
- −4
- 1429±111
- Oltmanns, Marilena
- 1 6 3
- 0
- 1728±47
- Varshney, Pratibha
- 4 3 3
- Frazier, George
- Rating Change
1100±200 − 221 = 879±137 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −172
- 937±156
- Maisel, Marc
- 6 8 −8 6
- −43
- 1091±114
- Chen, Yan
- 8 7 8
- −7
- 1247±84
- Li, Ling
- 5 6 8
- Fu, Xinwen
- Rating Change
1910±40 − 64 = 1846±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1557±72
- Landry, Albert
- 6 7 −7 9
- −23
- 1318±131
- Muramatsu, Wataru
- −6 7 10 3
- 0
- 1465±46
- Wang, Daniel
- 4 4 −9 7
- −22
- 1555±71
- Bockoven, Connor
- 7 6 9
- 0
- 1326±74
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- 3 5 8
- −19
- 1698±48
- Varshney, Pratibha
- −11 7 7 2
- 0
- 1064±75
- Lee, Kayi
- 5 7 5
- Gao, Brian
- Rating Change
1185±84 + 319 = 1504±70 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +115
- 1852±49
- Shih, Chi-Jen
- 9 −8 6 −9 9
- −2
- 1534±47
- Bondarev, Alex
- 5 13 11
- +137
- 1613±62
- Kwong, William
- 9 12 4
- −1
- 1555±71
- Landry, Albert
- 9 −9 −8 6 13
- +53
- 1498±92
- Schrimpf, Paul
- −13 −12 8 7 6
- −1
- 1635±79
- Bockoven, Connor
- 3 8 8
- +17
- 1389±80
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- 5 8 5
- 0
- 1938±66
- Page, Robert
- 5 3 5
- 0
- 1081±47
- Iskepally, Kalyan
- 9 6 6
- 0
- 1972±73
- Kirsten, Markus
- 5 7 −9 5
- Gore, Nelson
- Rating Change
1331±125 − 35 = 1296±109 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −34
- 1463±87
- Bockoven, Chase
- −3 12 8 8
- −1
- 1728±47
- Varshney, Pratibha
- 3 10 2
- 0
- 2017±65
- Hu, HY
- 5 7 3
- Grandhi, Sai
- Rating Change
1100±200 − 335 = 765±111 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −219
- 873±115
- Lee, CJ
- 3 3 9
- −74
- 915±73
- Wang, Darren
- 0 1 1
- −22
- 996±105
- Khoury, Nhaim
- 3 4 7
- −11
- 1037±77
- Hershenow, Barry
- 1 1 1
- −8
- 1041±77
- Lee, Kayi
- 5 2 2
- 0
- 1429±111
- Oltmanns, Marilena
- 2 4 2
- Grubin, Mike
- Rating Change
712±122 − 26 = 686±111 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −15
- 949±70
- Xian, Bryan
- 4 7 8
- −11
- 949±95
- Kanakavelu, Siva
- 7 6 7
- Halliday, Kim
- Rating Change
1268±104 − 201 = 1067±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 1066±85
- Croitoru, Dorian
- 8 6 8
- −150
- 773±81
- Slepchuk, Alec
- 3 9 5
- +3
- 753±120
- Morrison, Keith
- −8 1 −10 8 7
- −73
- 1032±44
- Reed, Robert
- 8 10 10
- −16
- 1176±77
- Maisel, David
- 8 8 −7 5
- 0
- 1554±78
- Wu, Cheng-Hsun
- 5 5 8
- Hershenow, Barry
- Rating Change
919±123 + 156 = 1075±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +103
- 1184±113
- Cohen, Marcio
- −7 11 9 7
- −34
- 1049±43
- Reed, Robert
- 10 −9 7 15
- +64
- 1118±82
- Lee, Kayi
- −8 8 7 8
- −1
- 1350±46
- Wong, Peter
- −8 −7 3 2 5
- +20
- 980±82
- Wang, Darren
- 3 4 2
- 0
- 1473±86
- Selvin, Lawrence
- 4 5 7
- +4
- 790±122
- Grandhi, Sai
- 1 1 1
- Hu, HY
- Rating Change
1975±91 + 47 = 2022±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +45
- 1990±49
- Wu, Alison
- 5 7 12 5
- −46
- 1937±77
- Kirsten, Markus
- 8 9 12
- +21*
- 1984±83
- Page, Robert
- −9 9 −6 2 10 12
- +21*
- 1984±83
- Page, Robert
- −8 −8 8 8 10
- +3
- 1755±81
- Sharma, Rajeev
- 9 −11 10 4
- +2
- 1743±87
- Morris, Harold
- 7 7 2
- +1
- 1730±47
- Varshney, Pratibha
- 10 12 −9 7
- +1
- 1638±81
- Bockoven, Connor
- 5 6 7
- 0
- 1480±84
- Bockoven, Chase
- 7 5 9
- 0
- 1276±105
- Gore, Nelson
- 5 7 3
- 0
- 1049±77
- Cao, Frank
- 7 2 3
- Husmann, Don
- Rating Change
823±91 + 14 = 837±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +62
- 985±46
- O’Rourke, Robert
- 16 −8 4 −6 5
- −22
- 930±75
- Wang, Darren
- 9 7 8
- −15
- 933±73
- Lasnik, Howard
- −10 9 5 −6 7
- −11
- 933±87
- Slepchuk, Zachary
- −13 9 9 8
- 0
- 1409±78
- Schrimpf, Paul
- 8 6 5
- Iskepally, Kalyan
- Rating Change
1065±50 + 25 = 1090±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1567±47
- Bondarev, Alex
- 3 7 −14 9
- −13
- 1068±98
- Wang, George
- −7 8 4 8
- +6
- 985±63
- Qu, Jonathan
- 10 5 7
- −1
- 1323±76
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- 3 3 5
- −1
- 1349±46
- Wong, Peter
- 5 6 9
- 0
- 1408±79
- Schrimpf, Paul
- 5 4 4
- 0
- 1468±77
- Gao, Brian
- 9 6 6
- 0
- 1735±83
- Morris, Harold
- 7 −12 6 8
- 0
- 1972±73
- Kirsten, Markus
- 2 8 6
- Kanakavelu, Siva
- Rating Change
1026±115 − 78 = 948±90 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 695±114
- Grubin, Mike
- 7 6 7
- −87
- 918±73
- Xian, Bryan
- 9 7 8
- Khoury, Nhaim
- Rating Change
1100±200 − 74 = 1026±97 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +90
- 967±109
- Lee, CJ
- 6 8 5
- −204
- 953±60
- Qu, Jonathan
- −4 11 −7 7 7
- +30
- 872±80
- Slepchuk, Alec
- 6 9 −6 9
- −2
- 1429±111
- Oltmanns, Marilena
- 5 −10 5 4
- +10
- 769±118
- Grandhi, Sai
- 3 4 7
- +1
- 581±135
- Lin, Han-Hsuan
- 7 8 −15 6
- Kirsten, Markus
- Rating Change
1974±95 + 6 = 1980±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +56
- 2055±78
- Hu, HY
- 8 9 12
- −57
- 1907±69
- Page, Robert
- 4 4 7
- +5
- 1744±87
- Morris, Harold
- 4 4 3
- +1
- 1638±81
- Bockoven, Connor
- 5 9 4
- 0
- 1557±71
- Landry, Albert
- 6 2 7
- 0
- 1469±76
- Gao, Brian
- 5 7 −9 5
- 0
- 1115±91
- Wang, George
- 1 4 1
- 0
- 1075±46
- Iskepally, Kalyan
- 2 8 6
- Kwong, William
- Rating Change
1583±87 − 5 = 1578±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 1595±86
- Wu, Cheng-Hsun
- −9 8 10 8
- −66
- 1396±89
- Gao, Brian
- 9 12 4
- +25
- 1545±48
- Bondarev, Alex
- 9 9 8
- −17
- 1606±82
- Bockoven, Connor
- −7 −9 6 8 2
- +12
- 1508±105
- Selvin, Lawrence
- 8 −8 4 9
- −1
- 1814±50
- Shih, Chi-Jen
- 7 5 8
- +4
- 1385±43
- Simpson, John
- 5 11 7
- +1
- 1186±130
- Ren, Fucheng
- 2 10 5
- 0
- 946±70
- Lasnik, Howard
- 2 3 5
- Landry, Albert
- Rating Change
1539±85 + 9 = 1548±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +20
- 1494±81
- Gao, Brian
- 9 −9 −8 6 13
- −35
- 1520±84
- Wu, Cheng-Hsun
- 6 8 8
- +16
- 1474±48
- Wang, Daniel
- 6 5 8
- −1
- 1849±39
- Fu, Xinwen
- 6 7 −7 9
- +9
- 1429±87
- Sukher, Leonid
- 8 −4 7 6
- 0
- 1938±66
- Page, Robert
- 7 7 7
- 0
- 1117±93
- Wang, George
- 7 4 6
- 0
- 1971±73
- Kirsten, Markus
- 6 2 7
- 0
- 1067±116
- Li, Kai
- 7 8 7
- 0
- 1065±75
- Lee, Kayi
- 10 −7 5 6
- 0
- 1049±77
- Cao, Frank
- 7 8 6
- Lasnik, Howard
- Rating Change
1098±98 − 151 = 947±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 852±72
- Husmann, Don
- −10 9 5 −6 7
- −101
- 872±49
- Lau, Albert
- 8 8 −9 10
- −54
- 889±74
- Wang, Darren
- 11 6 6
- −11
- 1065±177
- Ren, Fucheng
- 8 8 7
- 0
- 1382±42
- Simpson, John
- 4 8 4
- 0
- 1406±79
- Schrimpf, Paul
- 5 2 8
- 0
- 1564±58
- Kwong, William
- 2 3 5
- Lau, Alan
- Rating Change
1293±94 + 40 = 1333±76 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +78
- 1488±48
- Wang, Daniel
- 11 3 5
- −38
- 1320±52
- Shea, Richard
- 4 −6 −9 5 5
- +1
- 973±59
- Qu, Jonathan
- 8 2 −9 9
- Lau, Albert
- Rating Change
882±50 + 13 = 895±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1001±78
- Lasnik, Howard
- 8 8 −9 10
- −9
- 958±62
- Qu, Jonathan
- 4 3 11
- Lee, CJ
- Rating Change
1100±200 − 174 = 926±104 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +41
- 769±118
- Grandhi, Sai
- 3 3 9
- −168
- 996±105
- Khoury, Nhaim
- 6 8 5
- +6
- 614±58
- Oppenheimer, Victor
- 8 −6 −6 8 9
- −53
- 1046±43
- Reed, Robert
- 5 3 7
- −1
- 1429±111
- Oltmanns, Marilena
- 5 5 4
- Lee, Kayi
- Rating Change
1101±105 − 37 = 1064±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 957±77
- Wang, Darren
- 3 3 7
- −67
- 1019±81
- Hershenow, Barry
- −8 8 7 8
- +7
- 842±87
- Sipser, Aaron
- 4 8 5
- −3
- 1329±53
- Shea, Richard
- 4 8 −8 −10 13
- +3
- 765±118
- Grandhi, Sai
- 5 2 2
- 0
- 1465±46
- Wang, Daniel
- 8 8 −5 6
- 0
- 578±134
- Lin, Han-Hsuan
- 5 6 7
- 0
- 1555±71
- Landry, Albert
- 10 −7 5 6
- 0
- 1849±39
- Fu, Xinwen
- 5 7 5
- Li, Kai
- Rating Change
1100±200 − 13 = 1087±113 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +121
- 1067±80
- Cao, Frank
- 9 5 5
- −133
- 1088±91
- Wang, George
- −9 8 4 2
- −1
- 1555±70
- Landry, Albert
- 7 8 7
- Li, Ling
- Rating Change
1100±200 + 182 = 1282±77 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +176
- 1259±67
- Wang, Hong-Ren
- 10 8 −10 6
- −38
- 1381±79
- Wang, Phillip
- −4 4 12 −5 8
- +38
- 1182±113
- Chen, Yan
- 6 5 6
- −16
- 1404±76
- Sukher, Leonid
- −9 8 3 9
- +18
- 1122±76
- Wong, David
- 7 9 8
- −11
- 1429±111
- Oltmanns, Marilena
- −5 8 −6 3 6
- +11
- 1100±145
- Maisel, Marc
- 10 7 4
- +3
- 937±156
- Frazier, George
- 5 6 8
- Lin, Han-Hsuan
- Rating Change
681±172 − 90 = 591±136 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −58
- 821±85
- Sipser, Aaron
- 9 4 9
- −24
- 852±81
- Slepchuk, Alec
- 4 8 9
- −5
- 968±59
- Qu, Jonathan
- 8 5 8
- −3
- 1037±102
- Khoury, Nhaim
- 7 8 −15 6
- −1
- 1062±76
- Lee, Kayi
- 5 6 7
- 0
- 1331±53
- Shea, Richard
- 12 7 2
- Maisel, David
- Rating Change
1170±85 + 18 = 1188±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1099±77
- Halliday, Kim
- 8 8 −7 5
- −9
- 1381±43
- Simpson, John
- 4 −10 4 7
- +5
- 962±86
- Slepchuk, Zachary
- 8 7 3
- −1
- 1557±77
- Wu, Cheng-Hsun
- 4 4 3
- +1
- 754±121
- Morrison, Keith
- 7 7 9
- 0
- 613±57
- Oppenheimer, Victor
- 7 3 9
- Maisel, Marc
- Rating Change
1100±200 − 80 = 1020±121 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +67
- 937±156
- Frazier, George
- 6 8 −8 6
- −126
- 1091±114
- Chen, Yan
- −11 −9 6 7 5
- −21
- 1247±84
- Li, Ling
- 10 7 4
- Morris, Harold
- Rating Change
1745±96 + 8 = 1753±81 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +24
- 1659±89
- Bockoven, Connor
- 6 −9 −9 10 9
- −11
- 1966±75
- Kirsten, Markus
- 4 4 3
- 0
- 1116±91
- Wang, George
- 3 4 9
- −5
- 2014±66
- Hu, HY
- 7 7 2
- 0
- 1075±46
- Iskepally, Kalyan
- 7 −12 6 8
- 0
- 1049±77
- Cao, Frank
- 5 7 9
- Morrison, Keith
- Rating Change
796±138 − 47 = 749±117 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −37
- 944±71
- Xian, Bryan
- 7 8 9
- −7
- 1075±73
- Halliday, Kim
- −8 1 −10 8 7
- −2
- 1170±49
- Wang, Andrew
- 9 −9 1 11
- −1
- 1215±75
- Maisel, David
- 7 7 9
- −1
- 1235±64
- Wang, Hong-Ren
- −9 4 9 8
- 0
- 1558±77
- Wu, Cheng-Hsun
- 6 4 5
- Muramatsu, Wataru
- Rating Change
1100±200 + 418 = 1518±106 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +388
- 1869±39
- Fu, Xinwen
- −6 7 10 3
- −12
- 1556±77
- Wu, Cheng-Hsun
- 7 11 8
- +43
- 1365±78
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- 8 10 −6 7
- −1
- 1728±47
- Varshney, Pratibha
- −7 5 −10 7 4
- O’Rourke, Robert
- Rating Change
989±50 − 23 = 966±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1003±97
- Slepchuk, Zachary
- −7 7 7 5
- −29
- 780±76
- Husmann, Don
- 16 −8 4 −6 5
- −8
- 1045±44
- Reed, Robert
- 9 9 −10 6
- Oltmanns, Marilena
- Rating Change
1100±200 + 344 = 1444±106 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +269
- 1424±98
- Ozay, Necmiye
- 6 −12 8 −5 7
- −2
- 1728±47
- Varshney, Pratibha
- −9 5 7 8
- +55
- 1301±86
- Li, Ling
- −5 8 −6 3 6
- +14
- 1182±113
- Chen, Yan
- 3 6 −6 6
- +4
- 1078±110
- Khoury, Nhaim
- 5 −10 5 4
- +3
- 986±164
- Feng, Yi
- 1 6 3
- +1
- 967±109
- Lee, CJ
- 5 5 4
- 0
- 769±118
- Grandhi, Sai
- 2 4 2
- Ooi, Choon Wei
- Rating Change
2010±164 − 234 = 1776±102 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1480±84
- Bockoven, Chase
- 6 9 7
- −219
- 1686±82
- Sharma, Rajeev
- 8 8 8
- −23
- 1966±48
- Wu, Alison
- 7 −7 6 11
- Oppenheimer, Victor
- Rating Change
616±59 − 3 = 613±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −2
- 939±107
- Lee, CJ
- 8 −6 −6 8 9
- −1
- 951±83
- Slepchuk, Zachary
- 3 9 6
- 0
- 1053±43
- Reed, Robert
- 5 9 9
- 0
- 1216±75
- Maisel, David
- 7 3 9
- 0
- 1382±42
- Simpson, John
- 10 3 11
- Ozay, Necmiye
- Rating Change
1414±108 − 44 = 1370±89 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1143±111
- Chen, Yan
- 9 3 4
- −55
- 1366±122
- Oltmanns, Marilena
- 6 −12 8 −5 7
- +2
- 937±156
- Feng, Yi
- 8 6 8
- −2
- 1728±47
- Varshney, Pratibha
- 4 10 6
- Page, Robert
- Rating Change
1936±87 + 8 = 1944±64 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 2020±88
- Kirsten, Markus
- 4 4 7
- −21*
- 1989±69
- Hu, HY
- −9 9 −6 2 10 12
- +4
- 1731±48
- Varshney, Pratibha
- 10 8 −11 8 5
- −21*
- 1989±69
- Hu, HY
- −8 −8 8 8 10
- +1
- 1559±77
- Wu, Cheng-Hsun
- 5 9 9
- +1
- 1559±97
- Yu, Zhong
- 4 10 12
- +1
- 1557±72
- Landry, Albert
- 7 7 7
- 0
- 1469±76
- Gao, Brian
- 5 3 5
- Qu, Jonathan
- Rating Change
935±93 + 76 = 1011±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +58
- 1171±126
- Khoury, Nhaim
- −4 11 −7 7 7
- −22
- 1048±44
- Reed, Robert
- −9 6 6 11
- +29
- 989±76
- Xian, Bryan
- −8 10 −6 8 10
- −12
- 1070±47
- Iskepally, Kalyan
- 10 5 7
- +14
- 909±49
- Lau, Albert
- 4 3 11
- −1
- 1321±78
- Lau, Alan
- 8 2 −9 9
- +9
- 891±85
- Slepchuk, Alec
- 4 2 −7 9
- 0
- 1331±53
- Shea, Richard
- −8 7 5 4
- 0
- 584±136
- Lin, Han-Hsuan
- 8 5 8
- 0
- 1350±46
- Wong, Peter
- 4 8 5
- 0
- 1465±46
- Wang, Daniel
- 6 9 10
- Reed, Robert
- Rating Change
971±50 + 93 = 1064±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1144±78
- Halliday, Kim
- 8 10 10
- 0
- 1409±79
- Schrimpf, Paul
- 3 −7 4 7
- +21
- 1139±93
- Croitoru, Dorian
- 8 8 9
- +19
- 1134±86
- Hershenow, Barry
- 10 −9 7 15
- +9
- 1042±129
- Lee, CJ
- 5 3 7
- +8
- 999±64
- Qu, Jonathan
- −9 6 6 11
- +6
- 978±47
- O’Rourke, Robert
- 9 9 −10 6
- +3
- 888±87
- Slepchuk, Alec
- 2 8 3
- 0
- 614±58
- Oppenheimer, Victor
- 5 9 9
- Ren, Fucheng
- Rating Change
1100±200 + 33 = 1133±134 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +73
- 956±72
- Lasnik, Howard
- 8 8 7
- −38
- 1381±42
- Simpson, John
- −10 8 −7 10 10
- −3
- 1563±58
- Kwong, William
- 2 10 5
- Schrimpf, Paul
- Rating Change
1469±160 − 20 = 1449±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +61
- 1355±47
- Wong, Peter
- 8 −11 6 4
- −103
- 1439±84
- Gao, Brian
- −13 −12 8 7 6
- +27
- 1339±59
- Shea, Richard
- 3 9 −9 7
- −26
- 1528±47
- Bondarev, Alex
- 10 −6 14 8
- +18
- 1339±77
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- 2 7 15
- +1
- 1075±46
- Iskepally, Kalyan
- 5 4 4
- 0
- 1054±43
- Reed, Robert
- 3 −7 4 7
- 0
- 947±70
- Lasnik, Howard
- 5 2 8
- 0
- 945±72
- Wang, Darren
- 11 −11 8 4
- 0
- 847±70
- Husmann, Don
- 8 6 5
- Selvin, Lawrence
- Rating Change
1467±115 − 6 = 1461±84 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +30
- 1356±47
- Wong, Peter
- 7 9 7
- −38
- 1554±60
- Kwong, William
- 8 −8 4 9
- +2
- 1074±109
- Cohen, Marcio
- −12 5 9 4
- +1
- 1062±76
- Hershenow, Barry
- 4 5 7
- Sharma, Rajeev
- Rating Change
1698±104 + 47 = 1745±79 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +70
- 1898±119
- Ooi, Choon Wei
- 8 8 8
- −105
- 1395±84
- Bockoven, Chase
- 8 7 −8 16
- +82
- 1849±10
- Stown, Greg
- −10 8 1 7
- −1
- 1975±47
- Wu, Alison
- −8 10 3 6
- +1
- 1327±75
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- 5 −6 10 −4 4
- −1
- 2015±66
- Hu, HY
- 9 −11 10 4
- 0
- 1049±77
- Cao, Frank
- 4 7 6
- Shea, Richard
- Rating Change
1244±51 + 84 = 1328±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1495±47
- Wang, Daniel
- 5 −7 7 9
- −5
- 1397±82
- Schrimpf, Paul
- 3 9 −9 7
- +26
- 1407±49
- Simpson, John
- 6 9 5
- −1
- 1534±47
- Bondarev, Alex
- 4 5 4
- +19
- 1403±97
- Lau, Alan
- 4 −6 −9 5 5
- +9
- 1268±71
- Wang, Hong-Ren
- 7 −6 −5 9 8
- +1
- 1075±80
- Lee, Kayi
- 4 8 −8 −10 13
- 0
- 973±59
- Qu, Jonathan
- −8 7 5 4
- 0
- 836±84
- Sipser, Aaron
- 5 7 11
- 0
- 577±134
- Lin, Han-Hsuan
- 12 7 2
- Shih, Chi-Jen
- Rating Change
1850±50 − 32 = 1818±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1644±84
- Bockoven, Connor
- −5 8 7 8
- −37
- 1372±83
- Gao, Brian
- 9 −8 6 −9 9
- +1
- 1566±59
- Kwong, William
- 7 5 8
- Simpson, John
- Rating Change
1407±53 − 20 = 1387±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1227±83
- Maisel, David
- 4 −10 4 7
- −24
- 1307±49
- Shea, Richard
- 6 9 5
- +3
- 1212±144
- Ren, Fucheng
- −10 8 −7 10 10
- −3
- 1558±60
- Kwong, William
- 5 11 7
- 0
- 953±82
- Slepchuk, Zachary
- −9 10 8 7
- 0
- 947±70
- Lasnik, Howard
- 4 8 4
- 0
- 613±57
- Oppenheimer, Victor
- 10 3 11
- Sipser, Aaron
- Rating Change
828±90 + 0 = 828±82 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 598±140
- Lin, Han-Hsuan
- 9 4 9
- −9
- 1059±77
- Lee, Kayi
- 4 8 5
- 0
- 1331±53
- Shea, Richard
- 5 7 11
- Slepchuk, Alec
- Rating Change
793±104 + 69 = 862±76 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +96
- 1145±76
- Halliday, Kim
- 3 9 5
- −19
- 966±60
- Qu, Jonathan
- 4 2 −7 9
- +7
- 605±141
- Lin, Han-Hsuan
- 4 8 9
- −8
- 1032±105
- Khoury, Nhaim
- 6 9 −6 9
- −5
- 1050±83
- Croitoru, Dorian
- 5 7 4
- −3
- 1052±43
- Reed, Robert
- 2 8 3
- Slepchuk, Zachary
- Rating Change
1013±122 − 62 = 951±80 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 857±73
- Husmann, Don
- −13 9 9 8
- −84
- 951±46
- O’Rourke, Robert
- −7 7 7 5
- +2
- 614±58
- Oppenheimer, Victor
- 3 9 6
- −5
- 1208±76
- Maisel, David
- 8 7 3
- 0
- 1382±42
- Simpson, John
- −9 10 8 7
- Stown, Greg
- Rating Change
1850±10 − 3 = 1847±10 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1049±77
- Cao, Frank
- 4 5 3
- −2
- 1247±72
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- 4 7 13
- −1
- 1666±81
- Sharma, Rajeev
- −10 8 1 7
- Sukher, Leonid
- Rating Change
1344±95 + 74 = 1418±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +56
- 1439±88
- Wang, Phillip
- 2 9 10
- −12
- 1551±71
- Landry, Albert
- 8 −4 7 6
- +18
- 1288±89
- Li, Ling
- −9 8 3 9
- +10
- 1249±68
- Wang, Hong-Ren
- 3 5 5
- +2
- 1107±76
- Wong, David
- 4 7 7
- Varshney, Pratibha
- Rating Change
1697±50 + 36 = 1733±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +30
- 1868±39
- Fu, Xinwen
- −11 7 7 2
- −2
- 1935±67
- Page, Robert
- 10 8 −11 8 5
- +5
- 1582±129
- Muramatsu, Wataru
- −7 5 −10 7 4
- −1
- 2016±66
- Hu, HY
- 10 12 −9 7
- +2
- 1490±90
- Bockoven, Chase
- 12 7 −3 3
- +1
- 1453±119
- Oltmanns, Marilena
- −9 5 7 8
- 0
- 1360±93
- Ozay, Necmiye
- 4 10 6
- 0
- 1327±75
- Bokhman, Zinovy
- 7 7 7
- 0
- 1277±106
- Gore, Nelson
- 3 10 2
- 0
- 1133±106
- Chen, Yan
- 5 9 4
- 0
- 933±153
- Feng, Yi
- 4 3 3
- Wang, Andrew
- Rating Change
1172±50 − 8 = 1164±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 959±71
- Xian, Bryan
- 7 3 3
- −11
- 1215±70
- Wang, Hong-Ren
- −6 10 10 5
- 0
- 754±121
- Morrison, Keith
- 9 −9 1 11
- Wang, Daniel
- Rating Change
1534±50 − 73 = 1461±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1064±75
- Lee, Kayi
- 8 8 −5 6
- −33
- 1241±77
- Lau, Alan
- 11 3 5
- 0
- 971±59
- Qu, Jonathan
- 6 9 10
- −31
- 1300±46
- Shea, Richard
- 5 −7 7 9
- −9
- 1529±69
- Landry, Albert
- 6 5 8
- 0
- 1849±39
- Fu, Xinwen
- 4 4 −9 7
- Wang, Darren
- Rating Change
853±94 + 81 = 934±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +63
- 993±76
- Lasnik, Howard
- 11 6 6
- −12
- 1053±78
- Hershenow, Barry
- 3 4 2
- +26
- 878±77
- Husmann, Don
- 9 7 8
- −9
- 1057±77
- Lee, Kayi
- 3 3 7
- +12
- 813±126
- Grandhi, Sai
- 0 1 1
- 0
- 1409±78
- Schrimpf, Paul
- 11 −11 8 4
- Wang, George
- Rating Change
929±102 + 215 = 1144±91 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +98
- 1228±137
- Li, Kai
- −9 8 4 2
- 0
- 1556±70
- Landry, Albert
- 7 4 6
- +68
- 1107±82
- Cao, Frank
- 6 −13 4 6
- 0
- 1735±83
- Morris, Harold
- 3 4 9
- +48
- 1095±47
- Iskepally, Kalyan
- −7 8 4 8
- 0
- 1972±73
- Kirsten, Markus
- 1 4 1
- Wang, Hong-Ren
- Rating Change
1332±112 − 93 = 1239±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +28
- 1175±49
- Wang, Andrew
- −6 10 10 5
- −83
- 1204±90
- Li, Ling
- 10 8 −10 6
- +11
- 1108±76
- Wong, David
- 7 8 5
- −29
- 1318±51
- Shea, Richard
- 7 −6 −5 9 8
- +2
- 955±69
- Xian, Bryan
- 5 2 8
- −14
- 1360±83
- Wang, Phillip
- 7 −10 6 7
- 0
- 752±120
- Morrison, Keith
- −9 4 9 8
- −9
- 1388±79
- Sukher, Leonid
- 3 5 5
- Wang, Phillip
- Rating Change
1397±100 − 8 = 1389±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1279±87
- Li, Ling
- −4 4 12 −5 8
- −51
- 1377±79
- Sukher, Leonid
- 2 9 10
- +15
- 1244±67
- Wang, Hong-Ren
- 7 −10 6 7
- +3
- 1105±75
- Wong, David
- −9 6 6 8
- Wong, David
- Rating Change
1147±87 − 45 = 1102±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −25
- 1221±68
- Wang, Hong-Ren
- 7 8 5
- −15
- 1238±89
- Li, Ling
- 7 9 8
- −3
- 1381±80
- Wang, Phillip
- −9 6 6 8
- −2
- 1405±77
- Sukher, Leonid
- 4 7 7
- Wong, Peter
- Rating Change
1355±50 − 14 = 1341±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1079±112
- Cohen, Marcio
- 4 7 7
- −12
- 1375±85
- Schrimpf, Paul
- 8 −11 6 4
- +1
- 1075±46
- Iskepally, Kalyan
- 5 6 9
- −6
- 1449±93
- Selvin, Lawrence
- 7 9 7
- +1
- 1063±77
- Hershenow, Barry
- −8 −7 3 2 5
- 0
- 972±59
- Qu, Jonathan
- 4 8 5
- Wu, Alison
- Rating Change
1978±50 − 6 = 1972±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1814±121
- Ooi, Choon Wei
- 7 −7 6 11
- −13
- 1993±69
- Hu, HY
- 5 7 12 5
- +2
- 1753±81
- Sharma, Rajeev
- −8 10 3 6
- 0
- 1479±84
- Bockoven, Chase
- 9 4 14
- Wu, Cheng-Hsun
- Rating Change
1654±128 − 77 = 1577±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 1584±123
- Muramatsu, Wataru
- 7 11 8
- −108
- 1479±106
- Yu, Zhong
- 10 4 −7 5
- +37
- 1576±82
- Landry, Albert
- 6 8 8
- −52
- 1540±60
- Kwong, William
- −9 8 10 8
- +1
- 1217±76
- Maisel, David
- 4 4 3
- −1
- 1935±67
- Page, Robert
- 5 9 9
- 0
- 1079±72
- Halliday, Kim
- 5 5 8
- 0
- 752±120
- Morrison, Keith
- 6 4 5
- Xian, Bryan
- Rating Change
936±93 + 16 = 952±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +45
- 1034±111
- Kanakavelu, Siva
- 9 7 8
- −39
- 954±62
- Qu, Jonathan
- −8 10 −6 8 10
- +10
- 783±129
- Morrison, Keith
- 7 8 9
- −3
- 1168±49
- Wang, Andrew
- 7 3 3
- +4
- 703±117
- Grubin, Mike
- 4 7 8
- −1
- 1234±65
- Wang, Hong-Ren
- 5 2 8
- Yu, Zhong
- Rating Change
1480±107 + 80 = 1560±92 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +81
- 1611±86
- Wu, Cheng-Hsun
- 10 4 −7 5
- −1
- 1938±66
- Page, Robert
- 4 10 12
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 71. Matches: 210. State: Massachusetts (MA). Country: United States (USA). Director: Wu, Patrick. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 6197. Submitted/revised: 2010-05-20 3:11 pm EDT. Last processed: 2024-03-20 7:57 am EDT.