2010 Under 1200 Tournament
2010-08-14
Detailed Report
- Bunker, Michael
- Rating Change
906±88 + 39 = 945±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +63
- 1059±55
- Wang, Harvey
- 7 6 4
- −51
- 797±109
- Da, Leezan
- −4 −5 6 8 8
- +35
- 957±64
- Molter, Kevin
- 10 11 −5 6
- −40
- 814±55
- Chen, Jem
- 2 −9 6 8
- +13*
- 862±63
- Li, Alex
- 7 8 −8 9
- 0
- 1570±240
- D’Mello, Paul
- 5 9 11
- +13*
- 862±63
- Li, Alex
- −10 6 −8 9 7
- +6
- 796±62
- Eiles, Mark
- 6 8 3
- +1
- 620±73
- Gumapac, Paul
- 6 −7 −6 2 2
- +1
- 609±59
- Denham, Kai
- 0 7 −7 1
- 0
- 292±244
- Kimball, Parker
- −10 6 9 9
- Chen, Jem
- Rating Change
787±64 + 95 = 882±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +42
- 1001±71
- Bunker, Michael
- 2 −9 6 8
- −26
- 758±67
- Eiles, Mark
- 9 7 −9 7
- +36
- 975±63
- Molter, Kevin
- −4 11 −7 2 8
- −1
- 1042±53
- Fan, Yun
- 6 6 14
- +25
- 959±99
- Da, Leezan
- 8 7 8
- +18
- 869±62
- Li, Alex
- 11 8 9
- +1
- 317±263
- Kimball, Parker
- 4 6 7
- D’Mello, Paul
- Rating Change
1001±445 + 563 = 1564±239 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +551
- 1318±36
- Jayendra, Jayendra
- 8 9 4
- +3
- 954±63
- Bunker, Michael
- 5 9 11
- +2
- 952±49
- Shih, Paul
- −11 5 14 8
- +2
- 936±60
- Molter, Kevin
- 8 −10 8 5
- +1*
- 924±53
- Robinson, Vance
- 6 8 11
- +1*
- 924±53
- Robinson, Vance
- −9 7 −9 4 6
- +1
- 901±92
- Elliott, Ian
- 8 −9 10 −8 6
- +1
- 881±87
- Da, Leezan
- −11 11 6 6
- 0
- 831±41
- Schultz, Jeff
- 3 6 −8 7
- 0
- 400±268
- Kimball, Riley
- 2 10 5
- Da, Jefferey
- Rating Change
264±312 − 115 = 149±185 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −106
- 606±58
- Denham, Kai
- 4 6 4
- −10
- 729±110
- Upton, Wesley
- 4 6 −11 14
- Da, Leezan
- Rating Change
530±399 + 367 = 897±82 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +462
- 961±63
- Bunker, Michael
- −4 −5 6 8 8
- −165
- 836±54
- Chen, Jem
- 8 7 8
- +84
- 942±64
- Li, Andy
- 11 11 −4 7
- −16
- 918±52
- Robinson, Vance
- 5 5 5
- +2
- 369±253
- Kimball, Parker
- 5 1 10
- 0
- 1314±36
- Jayendra, Jayendra
- 5 4 2
- 0
- 1568±240
- D’Mello, Paul
- −11 11 6 6
- Denham, Kai
- Rating Change
708±72 − 147 = 561±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 419±98
- Nam, Thomas
- 7 11 11
- −71
- 73±109
- Liu, Raymond
- 8 7 4
- +1
- 143±210
- Da, Jefferey
- 4 6 4
- −19*
- 537±138
- Upton, Wesley
- 6 5 −9 10
- −19*
- 537±138
- Upton, Wesley
- 6 10 7
- −27
- 550±91
- Gumapac, Paul
- −9 −8 6 1 6
- −17
- 591±99
- Goetsch, John
- 3 10 4
- −2
- 829±59
- Li, Alex
- 10 6 8
- 0
- 945±63
- Bunker, Michael
- 0 7 −7 1
- Eiles, Mark
- Rating Change
875±97 − 77 = 798±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +39
- 854±60
- Chen, Jem
- 9 7 −9 7
- −60
- 814±60
- Li, Alex
- 9 −4 8 9
- +6
- 622±73
- Gumapac, Paul
- −8 10 9 −9 5
- −37
- 818±41
- Schultz, Jeff
- 6 9 8
- −16
- 874±40
- Kimball, Anton
- 8 8 −9 8
- −7
- 934±64
- Bunker, Michael
- 6 8 3
- −2
- 1039±53
- Fan, Yun
- −7 5 4 5
- Elliott, Ian
- Rating Change
893±135 + 0 = 893±91 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +64
- 835±41
- Schultz, Jeff
- 10 6 7
- −64
- 939±50
- Shih, Paul
- 5 −14 −9 7 8
- 0
- 1570±240
- D’Mello, Paul
- 8 −9 10 −8 6
- Fan, Yun
- Rating Change
1031±54 + 12 = 1043±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 958±53
- Shih, Paul
- −9 −5 8 9 7
- −1
- 1314±36
- Jayendra, Jayendra
- 6 7 −2 3
- +3
- 842±57
- Chen, Jem
- 6 6 14
- +1
- 788±61
- Eiles, Mark
- −7 5 4 5
- Goetsch, John
- Rating Change
526±105 + 195 = 721±99 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +126
- 1029±235
- Upton, Wesley
- 5 4 5
- +52
- 635±60
- Denham, Kai
- 3 10 4
- +8
- 445±103
- Nam, Thomas
- 7 6 7
- +6
- 412±136
- Liu, Raymond
- 1 4 2
- +3
- 339±144
- Nguyen, Jimmy
- 2 5 0
- Gumapac, Paul
- Rating Change
602±101 + 17 = 619±71 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +51
- 628±61
- Denham, Kai
- −9 −8 6 1 6
- −15
- 780±62
- Eiles, Mark
- −8 10 9 −9 5
- −6
- 828±41
- Schultz, Jeff
- 6 10 9
- −5*
- 832±59
- Li, Alex
- 11 7 14
- −5*
- 832±59
- Li, Alex
- −9 5 −10 8 9
- −2
- 881±40
- Kimball, Anton
- 6 −8 7 9
- −1
- 947±62
- Bunker, Michael
- 6 −7 −6 2 2
- Jayendra, Jayendra
- Rating Change
1317±37 − 2 = 1315±36 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1045±54
- Fan, Yun
- 6 7 −2 3
- −3
- 1435±266
- D’Mello, Paul
- 8 9 4
- 0
- 931±59
- Molter, Kevin
- 5 −6 8 5
- 0
- 930±64
- Li, Andy
- 7 6 −8 10
- 0
- 920±52
- Robinson, Vance
- 4 2 8
- 0
- 872±87
- Da, Leezan
- 5 4 2
- Kimball, Anton
- Rating Change
890±45 − 10 = 880±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 837±42
- Schultz, Jeff
- −10 8 −6 7 9
- −18
- 804±61
- Li, Alex
- −7 11 9 −5 4
- +6
- 798±63
- Eiles, Mark
- 8 8 −9 8
- −8
- 909±64
- Molter, Kevin
- 5 8 8
- +1
- 620±73
- Gumapac, Paul
- 6 −8 7 9
- Kimball, Parker
- Rating Change
619±415 − 250 = 369±252 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −211
- 835±54
- Chen, Jem
- 4 6 7
- −31
- 863±88
- Da, Leezan
- 5 1 10
- −8
- 945±62
- Bunker, Michael
- −10 6 9 9
- Kimball, Riley
- Rating Change
619±415 − 206 = 413±273 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −176
- 917±52
- Robinson, Vance
- 9 9 8
- −30
- 928±60
- Molter, Kevin
- 2 7 6
- 0
- 1566±240
- D’Mello, Paul
- 2 10 5
- Li, Alex
- Rating Change
691±102 + 149 = 840±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +90
- 899±41
- Kimball, Anton
- −7 11 9 −5 4
- −22
- 832±55
- Chen, Jem
- 11 8 9
- +52
- 845±42
- Schultz, Jeff
- −4 9 −6 7 12
- −4*
- 943±63
- Bunker, Michael
- 7 8 −8 9
- +26
- 816±62
- Eiles, Mark
- 9 −4 8 9
- −4*
- 943±63
- Bunker, Michael
- −10 6 −8 9 7
- +5*
- 649±74
- Gumapac, Paul
- 11 7 14
- +5*
- 649±74
- Gumapac, Paul
- −9 5 −10 8 9
- +3
- 620±60
- Denham, Kai
- 10 6 8
- Li, Andy
- Rating Change
981±71 − 79 = 902±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −49
- 768±109
- Da, Leezan
- 11 11 −4 7
- −30
- 895±55
- Robinson, Vance
- 6 12 −3 −10 11
- 0
- 1314±36
- Jayendra, Jayendra
- 7 6 −8 10
- Liu, Raymond
- Rating Change
445±379 − 112 = 333±123 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +261
- 616±58
- Denham, Kai
- 8 7 4
- −335
- 259±139
- Nguyen, Jimmy
- 10 −9 6 −9 2
- −18*
- 394±100
- Nam, Thomas
- 4 10 5
- −18*
- 394±100
- Nam, Thomas
- −6 8 6 −9 14
- −1
- 659±97
- Goetsch, John
- 1 4 2
- 0
- 724±110
- Upton, Wesley
- 5 −9 −9 6 3
- Molter, Kevin
- Rating Change
885±98 + 52 = 937±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +79
- 1060±55
- Wang, Harvey
- 9 6 −4 10
- −65
- 818±55
- Chen, Jem
- −4 11 −7 2 8
- +37
- 940±57
- Robinson, Vance
- 9 7 −10 −9 5
- −20
- 932±64
- Bunker, Michael
- 10 11 −5 6
- +20
- 891±41
- Kimball, Anton
- 5 8 8
- 0
- 1314±36
- Jayendra, Jayendra
- 5 −6 8 5
- +1
- 398±280
- Kimball, Riley
- 2 7 6
- 0
- 1571±240
- D’Mello, Paul
- 8 −10 8 5
- Nam, Thomas
- Rating Change
413±125 + 61 = 474±80 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +40*
- 491±134
- Liu, Raymond
- 4 10 5
- −22
- 603±59
- Denham, Kai
- 7 11 11
- +40*
- 491±134
- Liu, Raymond
- −6 8 6 −9 14
- −10
- 659±99
- Goetsch, John
- 7 6 7
- +21
- 373±148
- Nguyen, Jimmy
- 6 4 6
- −4*
- 722±114
- Upton, Wesley
- −8 8 6 −9 4
- −4*
- 722±114
- Upton, Wesley
- −9 9 −8 9 12
- Nguyen, Jimmy
- Rating Change
401±196 − 24 = 377±117 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +115
- 423±127
- Liu, Raymond
- 10 −9 6 −9 2
- −131
- 378±105
- Nam, Thomas
- 6 4 6
- −7
- 659±98
- Goetsch, John
- 2 5 0
- Robinson, Vance
- Rating Change
914±60 + 18 = 932±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 963±70
- Li, Andy
- 6 12 −3 −10 11
- −20
- 907±64
- Molter, Kevin
- 9 7 −10 −9 5
- +14
- 923±102
- Da, Leezan
- 5 5 5
- 0
- 1314±36
- Jayendra, Jayendra
- 4 2 8
- +1
- 389±277
- Kimball, Riley
- 9 9 8
- 0*
- 1570±240
- D’Mello, Paul
- 6 8 11
- 0*
- 1570±240
- D’Mello, Paul
- −9 7 −9 4 6
- Schultz, Jeff
- Rating Change
864±56 − 37 = 827±39 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 801±63
- Eiles, Mark
- 6 9 8
- −22
- 809±62
- Li, Alex
- −4 9 −6 7 12
- +2
- 621±73
- Gumapac, Paul
- 6 10 9
- −12
- 814±115
- Elliott, Ian
- 10 6 7
- −9
- 873±41
- Kimball, Anton
- −10 8 −6 7 9
- −4
- 939±51
- Shih, Paul
- 5 9 1
- 0
- 1571±240
- D’Mello, Paul
- 3 6 −8 7
- Shih, Paul
- Rating Change
943±56 + 11 = 954±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 943±106
- Elliott, Ian
- 5 −14 −9 7 8
- −10
- 1036±53
- Fan, Yun
- −9 −5 8 9 7
- +6
- 834±42
- Schultz, Jeff
- 5 9 1
- 0
- 1570±240
- D’Mello, Paul
- −11 5 14 8
- Upton, Wesley
- Rating Change
445±379 + 274 = 719±107 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +217*
- 617±58
- Denham, Kai
- 6 5 −9 10
- −188
- 659±97
- Goetsch, John
- 5 4 5
- +217*
- 617±58
- Denham, Kai
- 6 10 7
- +9*
- 432±96
- Nam, Thomas
- −8 8 6 −9 4
- +9*
- 432±96
- Nam, Thomas
- −9 9 −8 9 12
- +6
- 398±124
- Liu, Raymond
- 5 −9 −9 6 3
- +3
- 183±219
- Da, Jefferey
- 4 6 −11 14
- Wang, Harvey
- Rating Change
1095±60 − 73 = 1022±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −41
- 884±62
- Molter, Kevin
- 9 6 −4 10
- −32
- 902±62
- Bunker, Michael
- 7 6 4
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 26. Matches: 76. State: Oregon (OR). Country: United States (USA). Director: Burns, Paige. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 7102. Submitted/revised: 2014-04-13 12:29 am EDT. Last processed: 2021-01-09 1:28 pm EST.