UMNTTC Friday League
2011-01-28
Detailed Report
- Chen, Evan
- Rating Change
1500±200 − 217 = 1283±122 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 1112±115
- Johnson, James
- −8 5 8 −9 13
- −256
- 1192±120
- Zhu, Zhongrun
- 7 10 7
- −5
- 1654±48
- He, Oliver
- −9 9 9 9
- Corkery, Ando
- Rating Change
800±200 + 289 = 1089±126 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +120*
- 1014±145
- Paul, Jerome
- 1 2 4
- +120*
- 1014±145
- Paul, Jerome
- 4 2 5
- +17*
- 800±123
- Shih, Kevin
- 3 2 7
- +17*
- 800±123
- Shih, Kevin
- 6 6 7
- +13
- 785±120
- Motzko, Adam
- 4 1 1
- +2
- 598±146
- Skerbitz, Dylan
- 2 0 0
- Fainerman, Genna
- Rating Change
1500±200 − 297 = 1203±98 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 1112±115
- Johnson, James
- 9 −9 9 9
- −289
- 1191±61
- Sand, Yash
- 7 10 7
- −51
- 1297±60
- Pambuccian, Felix
- −8 12 −8 2 9
- −1
- 1681±133
- Wang, Xiaopeng
- 6 4 8
- Ge, Ruiyi
- Rating Change
1462±60 + 54 = 1516±65 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +52
- 1827±90
- Long, Qinghua
- 2 −3 −8 9 6
- −5
- 1688±138
- Wang, Xiaopeng
- 9 6 6 6
- +5
- 1325±60
- Pambuccian, Felix
- 10 3 13
- +1
- 1220±60
- Sand, Yash
- 8 −10 6 −10 2
- He, Oliver
- Rating Change
1700±58 − 51 = 1649±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1358±128
- Chen, Evan
- −9 9 9 9
- −41
- 1267±59
- Pambuccian, Felix
- 9 −6 7 4
- 0
- 1278±101
- Zhu, Zhongrun
- −9 6 9 −10 6
- −12
- 1675±92
- Long, Qinghua
- 9 9 −9 9
- Johnson, James
- Rating Change
1500±200 − 460 = 1040±102 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −319
- 1120±76
- Wang, Jing
- 5 6 3
- −79
- 1145±115
- Fainerman, Genna
- 9 −9 9 9
- −45
- 1157±72
- Pham, Dung
- 12 8 9
- −16
- 1244±143
- Chen, Evan
- −8 5 8 −9 13
- Kim, Jang Soo
- Rating Change
1296±78 + 95 = 1391±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +37*
- 1404±66
- Luo, Pengkui
- 6 −14 6 7
- −1*
- 1702±134
- Wang, Xiaopeng
- 4 5 6
- +37*
- 1404±66
- Luo, Pengkui
- 8 8 9
- −1*
- 1702±134
- Wang, Xiaopeng
- 5 3 5
- +19
- 1342±62
- Pambuccian, Felix
- −9 6 6 −8 11
- +4
- 1176±72
- Wang, Jing
- −9 5 −7 6 7
- Long, Qinghua
- Rating Change
1800±100 − 85 = 1715±82 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +42
- 1664±49
- He, Oliver
- 9 9 −9 9
- −127
- 1460±57
- Ge, Ruiyi
- 2 −3 −8 9 6
- +1
- 1277±101
- Zhu, Zhongrun
- 9 4 5
- Luo, Pengkui
- Rating Change
1395±69 − 42 = 1353±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1204±75
- Pham, Dung
- 9 7 −10 −7 6
- −27*
- 1322±67
- Kim, Jang Soo
- 6 −14 6 7
- +4
- 1168±71
- Wang, Jing
- 6 10 −8 10
- −27*
- 1322±67
- Kim, Jang Soo
- 8 8 9
- Motzko, Adam
- Rating Change
800±200 − 80 = 720±100 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0*
- 724±129
- Shih, Kevin
- 8 −9 3 8
- −43*
- 724±129
- Shih, Kevin
- −8 8 10 −6 9
- +32
- 598±146
- Skerbitz, Dylan
- 3 4 13
- −30*
- 841±128
- Paul, Jerome
- −10 4 7 9
- −30*
- 841±128
- Paul, Jerome
- 2 11 4
- −8
- 1025±143
- Corkery, Ando
- 4 1 1
- Pambuccian, Felix
- Rating Change
1245±73 + 82 = 1327±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +65
- 1695±53
- He, Oliver
- 9 −6 7 4
- −13
- 1366±62
- Kim, Jang Soo
- −9 6 6 −8 11
- +19
- 1310±118
- Fainerman, Genna
- −8 12 −8 2 9
- −2
- 1504±63
- Ge, Ruiyi
- 10 3 13
- +12
- 1238±62
- Sand, Yash
- 7 6 −7 5
- Paul, Jerome
- Rating Change
800±200 + 121 = 921±108 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +73*
- 800±123
- Motzko, Adam
- −10 4 7 9
- −36*
- 1014±145
- Corkery, Ando
- 1 2 4
- +73*
- 800±123
- Motzko, Adam
- 2 11 4
- −36*
- 1014±145
- Corkery, Ando
- 4 2 5
- +39
- 785±120
- Shih, Kevin
- 10 4 6
- +8
- 598±146
- Skerbitz, Dylan
- 4 4 1
- Pham, Dung
- Rating Change
1205±92 − 27 = 1178±67 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1160±127
- Johnson, James
- 12 8 9
- −42
- 1197±63
- Sand, Yash
- 3 −4 −7 8 10
- −8
- 1343±57
- Luo, Pengkui
- 9 7 −10 −7 6
- Sand, Yash
- Rating Change
1184±71 + 47 = 1231±58 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 1334±116
- Fainerman, Genna
- 7 10 7
- −12
- 1309±60
- Pambuccian, Felix
- 7 6 −7 5
- +24
- 1241±85
- Pham, Dung
- 3 −4 −7 8 10
- −1
- 1505±63
- Ge, Ruiyi
- 8 −10 6 −10 2
- Shih, Kevin
- Rating Change
800±200 − 70 = 730±101 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0*
- 724±129
- Motzko, Adam
- −8 8 10 −6 9
- −43*
- 724±129
- Motzko, Adam
- 8 −9 3 8
- +31
- 598±146
- Skerbitz, Dylan
- −11 9 −4 3 9
- −42
- 856±126
- Paul, Jerome
- 10 4 6
- −8*
- 1014±145
- Corkery, Ando
- 3 2 7
- −8*
- 1014±145
- Corkery, Ando
- 6 6 7
- Skerbitz, Dylan
- Rating Change
800±200 − 253 = 547±129 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −169
- 677±125
- Motzko, Adam
- 3 4 13
- −68
- 677±125
- Shih, Kevin
- −11 9 −4 3 9
- −14
- 856±126
- Paul, Jerome
- 4 4 1
- −3
- 1025±143
- Corkery, Ando
- 2 0 0
- Wang, Jing
- Rating Change
1134±80 + 21 = 1155±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1197±131
- Johnson, James
- 5 6 3
- −6
- 1347±57
- Luo, Pengkui
- 6 10 −8 10
- −4
- 1372±61
- Kim, Jang Soo
- −9 5 −7 6 7
- Wang, Xiaopeng
- Rating Change
1637±149 + 67 = 1704±128 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +48
- 1517±68
- Ge, Ruiyi
- 9 6 6 6
- +7*
- 1381±62
- Kim, Jang Soo
- 4 5 6
- +7*
- 1381±62
- Kim, Jang Soo
- 5 3 5
- +3
- 1281±102
- Zhu, Zhongrun
- 5 6 5
- +1
- 1234±100
- Fainerman, Genna
- 6 4 8
- Zhu, Zhongrun
- Rating Change
1196±122 + 111 = 1307±96 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +114
- 1531±137
- Chen, Evan
- 7 10 7
- −1
- 1658±48
- He, Oliver
- −9 6 9 −10 6
- −1
- 1706±132
- Wang, Xiaopeng
- 5 6 5
- −1
- 1723±82
- Long, Qinghua
- 9 4 5
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 19. Matches: 42. Club: University of Minnesota Table Tennis Club. State: Minnesota (MN). Country: United States (USA). Director: Ge, Ruiyi. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 7688. Submitted/revised: 2013-01-18 6:06 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-03-20 7:57 am EDT.