Brisbane Open: 2011
2011-06-04
Detailed Report
- Alcorn, Daniel
- Rating Change
863±99 + 53 = 916±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +58
- 936±45
- Tran, Cong
- −7 9 8 −4 6
- −26
- 971±55
- Parrott, Kingsley
- −9 4 9 11
- +19
- 844±102
- Childs, Misae
- 3 6 6
- −4
- 1118±67
- Vickers, Bill
- 6 5 5
- +8
- 750±64
- Lander, Zabrynn
- 8 −7 14 −9 14
- −3
- 1121±36
- Fourro, Brett
- 7 7 5
- +3
- 677±57
- Lane, Stephen
- −9 2 7 4
- −1
- 1185±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 8 −4 13 −9 9
- −1
- 1229±69
- Morley, Jackson
- 9 8 4
- 0
- 1389±39
- Dequina, Jordan
- 2 5 3
- 0
- 1474±39
- Tran, Thanh
- 7 6 2
- 0
- 1541±41
- Thomas, Rhys
- 6 1 5
- 0
- 1595±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 4 1 6
- 0
- 1737±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 4 3 5
- 0
- 1810±79
- Kozak, Lukas
- 3 3 3
- Bakanay, Seref
- Rating Change
2049±74 + 6 = 2055±73 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1864±61
- Lander, Peter
- 7 4 4 5
- 0
- 2689±53
- Henzell, William
- 6 6 9 8
- 0
- 1302±60
- Parrott, Ashley
- 9 8 2
- 0
- 1089±69
- Van Zelst, Andrew
- 5 3 1
- Barnett, Helen
- Rating Change
1607±66 + 2 = 1609±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1312±48
- Yu, Jan
- 6 −9 −8 5 6
- +1
- 1258±43
- Willis, Kathy
- 7 −7 9 9
- 0
- 1152±55
- Engstrom, Judith
- 7 9 −10 6
- 0
- 686±112
- Lander, Nicole
- 3 10 7
- Barnett, Jesse
- Rating Change
1187±74 + 1 = 1188±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +49
- 1477±114
- Goltz, Jason
- 7 6 12
- −39
- 1109±79
- Smith, Fred
- 7 6 −9 10
- 0
- 656±114
- Dequina, Gabby
- 5 6 5
- −8
- 1296±52
- Yang, Jim
- 7 1 −9 5
- −1
- 1459±48
- Hay, Kenneth
- −10 10 6 8
- Barnett, Morgan
- Rating Change
1251±59 + 17 = 1268±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 1408±41
- Dequina, Jordan
- −9 9 −9 11 8
- −24
- 1215±44
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- 9 6 5
- +10
- 1191±39
- Dahl, Olav
- 5 10 −9 8
- −2
- 1458±48
- Hay, Kenneth
- 10 5 −4 8
- 0
- 840±58
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- 1 8 7
- Bartley, Robert
- Rating Change
1308±48 − 2 = 1306±41 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +6
- 1216±64
- Ng, Wee Meng Tony
- 10 −10 11 11
- −11
- 1312±94
- Goltz, Jason
- 6 6 −8 −6 13
- +4
- 1189±39
- Dahl, Olav
- 8 10 5
- −1
- 1552±90
- Collado, Jan
- 7 6 −7 −7 7
- 0
- 2046±62
- Townsend, Kane
- 6 1 4
- Battilana, Michael
- Rating Change
1297±119 + 3 = 1300±93 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 1165±59
- Ratnan, Jim
- 8 10 9
- −26
- 1456±48
- Hay, Kenneth
- 4 8 7
- Buckland, Virgoe
- Rating Change
1414±57 − 8 = 1406±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1315±54
- Ng, Kwong
- 9 7 7
- −13
- 1468±40
- Tran, Thanh
- 6 5 5
- +4
- 1240±78
- Dinsey, Gregory
- 7 −10 −8 7 4
- −8
- 1498±96
- Mulley, Mark
- −7 9 7 7
- +1
- 1122±36
- Fourro, Brett
- −10 9 9 −8 8
- 0
- 1858±59
- Lander, Peter
- 4 6 9
- Buermeyer, Hinrich
- Rating Change
1586±84 + 61 = 1647±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +52
- 1666±45
- Fourro, John
- 5 6 6
- −14
- 1732±50
- Duffy, Jake
- 2 9 −9 −4 11
- +17
- 1549±43
- Thomas, Rhys
- −5 6 6 10
- 0
- 2388±77
- Levis, Bruno
- 7 7 1
- +5
- 1455±47
- So, Tsz Chiu Anakin
- 8 10 8
- +2
- 1362±55
- Opatrny, George
- 6 7 2
- Campbell-Innes, Claire
- Rating Change
2026±72 + 4 = 2030±69 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1819±85
- Kozak, Lukas
- 7 4 9 10
- −1
- 2386±78
- Levis, Bruno
- 4 8 6 9
- 0
- 1541±41
- Thomas, Rhys
- 10 −8 9 6
- 0
- 1487±86
- Taylor, Tereza
- 3 2 4 6
- 0
- 1356±85
- Goltz, Jason
- 5 3 6 7
- 0
- 1152±55
- Engstrom, Judith
- 1 2 1
- 0
- 1127±71
- Foessel, Max
- 4 4 3
- 0
- 840±58
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- 2 3 1
- Chappell, Tavis
- Rating Change
1478±43 − 2 = 1476±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1186±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 1 6 −9 7
- −3
- 1648±43
- Fourro, John
- −10 7 7 9
- 0
- 655±114
- Dequina, Gabby
- 5 6 7
- 0
- 1858±59
- Lander, Peter
- 5 6 −11 1
- Childs, Misae
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 212 = 788±89 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 674±56
- Lane, Stephen
- 5 8 10
- −208
- 702±65
- Lander, Zabrynn
- 3 11 7
- −36
- 896±66
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 3 6 6
- −1
- 1247±99
- Strack, Andrea
- 9 −7 6 4
- 0
- 1446±63
- Whisson, Jill
- 8 6 6
- Collado, Jan
- Rating Change
1400±200 + 169 = 1569±78 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +190
- 1577±45
- Rawlings, Jason
- 6 −8 9 −7 10
- −77
- 1542±54
- Nomura, Takashi
- 8 5 5
- +44
- 1511±94
- Ono, Kohei
- 12 6 6
- −5
- 1739±65
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- 3 6 9
- +12
- 1382±94
- Goltz, Jason
- 8 5 10
- 0
- 2170±75
- Townsend, Wade
- 9 −6 2 3
- +4
- 1308±45
- Bartley, Robert
- 7 6 −7 −7 7
- +1
- 1210±61
- Ng, Wee Meng Tony
- 6 10 7
- Dahl, Olav
- Rating Change
1155±46 + 30 = 1185±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19*
- 1335±57
- Gould, Benjamin
- −9 13 −6 13 11
- −6
- 1255±52
- Barnett, Morgan
- 5 10 −9 8
- +9
- 1150±71
- Vickers, Bill
- 9 −18 7 −3 10
- −3
- 1300±44
- Bartley, Robert
- 8 10 5
- +7
- 1129±37
- Fourro, Brett
- 9 4 8
- 0*
- 1335±57
- Gould, Benjamin
- −7 −5 6 7 7
- +2
- 1000±109
- Lander, Benjamin
- 4 2 2
- 0
- 1460±48
- Hay, Kenneth
- 7 8 4
- +1
- 983±55
- Parrott, Kingsley
- −7 8 5 3
- 0
- 1474±39
- Tran, Thanh
- 3 3 −10 4
- +1
- 924±65
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 8 −4 13 −9 9
- 0
- 1475±42
- Chappell, Tavis
- 1 6 −9 7
- 0
- 840±58
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- 4 −7 9 2
- 0
- 1541±41
- Thomas, Rhys
- 5 7 5
- 0
- 656±114
- Dequina, Gabby
- 7 5 11
- 0
- 1595±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 3 5 8
- 0
- 1650±42
- Fourro, John
- 6 9 6
- 0
- 1737±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 4 9 8
- 0
- 2046±62
- Townsend, Kane
- 1 7 5
- Dequina, Gabby
- Rating Change
664±117 − 13 = 651±112 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −7
- 970±106
- Lander, Benjamin
- −2 −4 11 5 5
- −4
- 978±54
- Parrott, Kingsley
- 5 4 9
- 0
- 1152±69
- Smith, Fred
- 7 9 4
- 0
- 1178±64
- Barnett, Jesse
- 5 6 5
- 0
- 1185±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 7 5 11
- 0
- 1306±48
- Gould, Benjamin
- 8 6 10
- 0
- 1476±42
- Chappell, Tavis
- 5 6 7
- 0
- 1737±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 1 6 5
- 0
- 1858±59
- Lander, Peter
- 5 3 2
- Dequina, Jordan
- Rating Change
1416±45 − 28 = 1388±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +3
- 1227±55
- Patane, Mark
- 8 10 12
- −24
- 1231±49
- Barnett, Morgan
- −9 9 −9 11 8
- 0
- 979±53
- Parrott, Kingsley
- 6 6 5
- −3
- 1537±42
- Thomas, Rhys
- 9 2 10
- 0
- 921±63
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 2 5 3
- −3
- 1541±55
- Nomura, Takashi
- 5 8 6
- 0
- 921±85
- Tran, Michael
- 9 −7 9 7
- 0
- 1736±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 2 4 7
- 0
- 1809±79
- Kozak, Lukas
- 6 9 10
- Dinsey, Gregory
- Rating Change
1296±111 − 60 = 1236±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1124±36
- Fourro, Brett
- 8 8 −6 10
- −63
- 1271±57
- Polkinghorne, Ian
- 3 −8 9 3
- −12
- 1408±49
- Buckland, Virgoe
- 7 −10 −8 7 4
- −6
- 1446±48
- Engstrom, David
- 4 5 6
- Duffy, Jake
- Rating Change
1708±57 + 21 = 1729±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1666±63
- Lane, Gavin
- −9 9 6 0
- −17
- 1718±67
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- 7 6 8
- +11
- 1657±71
- Buermeyer, Hinrich
- 2 9 −9 −4 11
- 0
- 2046±62
- Townsend, Kane
- 4 11 −11 6 4
- +6*
- 1611±55
- Houghton, Benjamin
- −10 6 7 11
- +6*
- 1611±55
- Houghton, Benjamin
- −4 6 −8 8 7
- +1
- 1475±39
- Tran, Thanh
- 8 5 6
- 0
- 1390±40
- Dequina, Jordan
- 2 4 7
- 0
- 1318±125
- Fazel, Amin
- 5 1 2
- 0
- 1306±48
- Gould, Benjamin
- 5 1 6
- 0
- 1230±69
- Morley, Jackson
- 5 5 4
- 0
- 1224±54
- Patane, Mark
- 6 5 2
- 0
- 1185±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 4 9 8
- 0
- 1122±36
- Fourro, Brett
- 10 5 5
- 0
- 921±63
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 4 3 5
- 0
- 795±87
- Fourro, Scott
- 4 5 6
- 0
- 655±114
- Dequina, Gabby
- 1 6 5
- Engstrom, David
- Rating Change
1458±60 − 1 = 1457±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1392±132
- Wu, Mike
- 9 4 4
- −27
- 1405±48
- Ninnes, Craig
- −7 −11 5 8 7
- +9
- 1362±66
- Yu, Peng
- 8 6 −7 5
- −6
- 1561±43
- Rawlings, Jason
- 9 −10 8 4
- +7
- 1340±46
- Oakley, Ian
- −10 8 2 3
- 0
- 1765±56
- Mitchell, Stephen
- 6 8 8
- +4
- 1294±57
- Polkinghorne, Ian
- 8 9 3
- 0
- 1811±78
- Schull, Daniel
- 8 2 −9 9
- +2
- 1237±77
- Dinsey, Gregory
- 4 5 6
- 0
- 1961±74
- Goedeke, Mark
- 7 4 7
- +1
- 1226±54
- Patane, Mark
- −8 5 6 3
- 0
- 795±87
- Fourro, Scott
- 2 6 3
- Engstrom, Judith
- Rating Change
1107±79 + 39 = 1146±54 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +60
- 1506±66
- Whisson, Jill
- 9 7 −6 −5 7
- −38
- 1012±132
- James, Blake
- 7 8 −10 −7 11
- +41
- 1278±43
- Willis, Kathy
- 8 9 −5 −8 10
- −9
- 1224±43
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- 7 −11 6 6
- +1
- 842±59
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- 11 −10 5 7
- −7
- 1232±47
- Zhang, Jason
- −10 7 −9 9 6
- 0
- 688±113
- Lander, Nicole
- 4 2 9
- −7
- 1236±100
- Strack, Andrea
- 7 −8 −2 10 9
- −2
- 1308±49
- Yu, Jan
- 9 4 7
- 0
- 1449±45
- So, Tsz Chiu Anakin
- 3 10 7
- 0
- 1610±65
- Barnett, Helen
- 7 9 −10 6
- 0
- 2032±69
- Campbell-Innes, Claire
- 1 2 1
- Fazel, Amin
- Rating Change
1359±139 − 47 = 1312±123 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −46
- 1470±39
- Tran, Thanh
- 2 9 10
- −1
- 1736±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 5 1 2
- Foessel, Max
- Rating Change
1102±76 + 30 = 1132±70 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +32
- 1117±71
- Van Zelst, Andrew
- 6 7 9
- −1
- 1475±69
- Momokawa, Ko
- 8 6 9
- 0
- 1541±41
- Thomas, Rhys
- 10 5 5
- 0
- 1548±53
- Nomura, Takashi
- 9 6 3
- 0
- 1742±65
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- 5 7 −11 6
- 0
- 2032±69
- Campbell-Innes, Claire
- 4 4 3
- Fourro, Brett
- Rating Change
1128±40 − 15 = 1113±35 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1007±111
- Lander, Benjamin
- 6 2 7
- −11
- 1081±76
- Vickers, Bill
- 8 −8 11 8
- +2
- 925±65
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 7 7 5
- −6
- 1179±39
- Dahl, Olav
- 9 4 8
- 0
- 797±89
- Fourro, Scott
- 8 7 12
- −4
- 1208±83
- Dinsey, Gregory
- 8 8 −6 10
- 0
- 1413±49
- Buckland, Virgoe
- −10 9 9 −8 8
- 0
- 1737±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 10 5 5
- Fourro, John
- Rating Change
1652±47 − 2 = 1650±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1671±78
- Kilmister, Paul
- −4 8 7 8
- −16
- 1602±68
- Buermeyer, Hinrich
- 5 6 6
- +2
- 1478±43
- Chappell, Tavis
- −10 7 7 9
- −2
- 1855±60
- Lander, Peter
- 8 9 12
- +1
- 1360±54
- Opatrny, George
- 10 1 7
- 0
- 1289±55
- Polkinghorne, Ian
- 5 4 5
- 0
- 1185±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 6 9 6
- Fourro, Scott
- Rating Change
805±94 − 10 = 795±87 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −6
- 1085±70
- Van Zelst, Andrew
- 4 2 9
- −3
- 1122±36
- Fourro, Brett
- 8 7 12
- −1
- 1223±54
- Patane, Mark
- 2 4 5
- 0
- 1237±46
- Zhang, Jason
- 5 −10 7 3
- 0
- 1450±47
- Engstrom, David
- 2 6 3
- 0
- 1737±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 4 5 6
- Goedeke, Mark
- Rating Change
1970±81 − 9 = 1961±74 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 1450±47
- Engstrom, David
- 7 4 7
- −10
- 2164±76
- Townsend, Wade
- −7 −10 5 4 11 6
- 0
- 1337±111
- Wu, Mike
- 11 5 10
- 0
- 1306±48
- Gould, Benjamin
- 2 1 8 5
- Goltz, Jason
- Rating Change
1401±229 − 46 = 1355±82 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +154
- 1309±51
- Yang, Jim
- 7 −4 2 7
- −283
- 1155±64
- Barnett, Jesse
- 7 6 12
- +65
- 1308±45
- Bartley, Robert
- 6 6 −8 −6 13
- −5
- 1544±89
- Collado, Jan
- 8 5 10
- +18
- 1210±61
- Ng, Wee Meng Tony
- 7 6 4
- 0
- 2031±69
- Campbell-Innes, Claire
- 5 3 6 7
- +5
- 1076±105
- Roesen, Paul
- −10 5 5 0
- Gould, Benjamin
- Rating Change
1274±54 + 29 = 1303±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1700±59
- Lane, Gavin
- 10 11 −6 −9 11
- −18*
- 1176±39
- Dahl, Olav
- −9 13 −6 13 11
- +15
- 1290±44
- Jorgensen, David
- 4 5 8
- −2
- 1473±39
- Tran, Thanh
- −10 −7 6 9 10
- 0*
- 1176±39
- Dahl, Olav
- −7 −5 6 7 7
- 0
- 1737±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 5 1 6
- 0
- 922±44
- Tran, Cong
- 4 2 9
- 0
- 1742±65
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- 4 10 −8 7
- 0
- 655±114
- Dequina, Gabby
- 8 6 10
- 0
- 1961±74
- Goedeke, Mark
- 2 1 8 5
- Hay, Kenneth
- Rating Change
1431±53 + 35 = 1466±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 1487±45
- O’Neill, Daniel
- 3 10 −4 7
- −5
- 1592±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 2 9 8
- +8
- 1375±62
- Opatrny, George
- 3 8 8
- 0*
- 1811±78
- Schull, Daniel
- 7 7 6
- +5
- 1314±111
- Battilana, Michael
- 4 8 7
- 0*
- 1811±78
- Schull, Daniel
- 1 6 1
- +3
- 1280±44
- Jorgensen, David
- 9 9 −8 −7 11
- +2
- 1267±53
- Barnett, Morgan
- 10 5 −4 8
- +1
- 1186±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 7 8 4
- +1
- 1181±65
- Barnett, Jesse
- −10 10 6 8
- +1
- 1159±58
- Ratnan, Jim
- 11 4 5
- 0
- 1123±66
- Vickers, Bill
- 5 −12 4 9
- Henzell, William
- Rating Change
2688±54 + 1 = 2689±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 2390±79
- Levis, Bruno
- 9 −8 6 −10 7 2
- 0
- 2170±75
- Townsend, Wade
- 3 5 3 11
- 0
- 2057±73
- Bakanay, Seref
- 6 6 9 8
- 0
- 1473±88
- Ono, Kohei
- 2 5 4
- 0
- 1471±41
- O’Neill, Daniel
- 3 5 1
- Hill, Ron
- Rating Change
1417±75 − 9 = 1408±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +10
- 1261±43
- Willis, Kathy
- −8 10 −9 8 8
- −24
- 1464±42
- O’Neill, Daniel
- 6 −6 8 9
- +3
- 1160±59
- Ratnan, Jim
- 6 10 7
- +1
- 1042±126
- Nethercott, Scott
- −2 6 7 11
- +1
- 1032±158
- McShane, Brian Michael Mick
- 6 7 5
- Houghton, Benjamin
- Rating Change
1577±58 + 17 = 1594±44 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1800±73
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- 10 −9 6 −9 4
- −29
- 1365±104
- Ono, Kohei
- 4 5 −9 −8 9
- +11
- 1551±43
- Thomas, Rhys
- 7 5 −10 4
- −3*
- 1729±51
- Duffy, Jake
- −10 6 7 11
- +5
- 1469±54
- Hay, Kenneth
- 2 9 8
- −3*
- 1729±51
- Duffy, Jake
- −4 6 −8 8 7
- +4
- 1455±47
- So, Tsz Chiu Anakin
- 8 8 9
- −1
- 1804±81
- Kozak, Lukas
- 12 8 5 3
- +3
- 1428±48
- Ninnes, Craig
- 8 7 9
- +1
- 1362±55
- Opatrny, George
- 6 5 −9 6
- +1
- 1304±60
- Parrott, Ashley
- −9 8 −9 4 3
- 0
- 1237±46
- Zhang, Jason
- 3 8 6
- 0
- 1207±51
- Reus, Nathan
- 7 8 5
- 0
- 1185±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 3 5 8
- 0
- 1107±95
- James, Blake
- 9 4 5
- 0
- 979±53
- Parrott, Kingsley
- 6 9 6
- 0
- 922±44
- Tran, Cong
- 3 7 2
- 0
- 921±63
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 4 1 6
- James, Blake
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 60 = 1140±91 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +113
- 1161±55
- Engstrom, Judith
- 7 8 −10 −7 11
- −135
- 1198±51
- Reus, Nathan
- 6 1 6
- −38
- 1223±42
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- 5 6 4
- 0
- 1594±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 9 4 5
- James, Jim
- Rating Change
947±146 − 6 = 941±142 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −5
- 1358±53
- Opatrny, George
- 7 8 3
- −1
- 1481±77
- Sung, James
- 8 3 6
- Jeffress, Anthony
- Rating Change
1887±73 + 37 = 1924±72 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +27
- 1880±65
- Lander, Peter
- 9 −11 −3 7 6
- +9
- 1775±60
- Mitchell, Stephen
- 9 7 9
- 0
- 1345±57
- Wiese, Brian
- 9 6 9
- 0
- 1277±43
- Jorgensen, David
- 4 7 3
- Jenkins, Mike
- Rating Change
1364±61 − 36 = 1328±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1158±71
- Smith, Fred
- 5 4 6
- −41
- 1207±43
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- 9 6 7
- Jorgensen, David
- Rating Change
1334±51 − 56 = 1278±43 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 1156±174
- Wu, Mike
- 11 −9 −9 11 11
- −17
- 1287±50
- Gould, Benjamin
- 4 5 8
- −11
- 1322±61
- Wiese, Brian
- −8 −9 9 9 6
- −8
- 1345±51
- Opatrny, George
- 8 2 −10 5
- −2
- 1455±48
- Hay, Kenneth
- 9 9 −8 −7 11
- 0
- 1648±59
- Lane, Gavin
- 6 9 7
- 0
- 1923±72
- Jeffress, Anthony
- 4 7 3
- Kilmister, Paul
- Rating Change
1670±79 − 38 = 1632±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1289±55
- Polkinghorne, Ian
- 3 3 5
- −39
- 1638±43
- Fourro, John
- −4 8 7 8
- Koschemann, Marc
- Rating Change
1400±200 + 123 = 1523±92 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +158
- 1528±97
- Taylor, Tereza
- 11 7 9
- −79
- 1538±41
- Thomas, Rhys
- 8 7 10
- +44
- 1432±48
- Ninnes, Craig
- 5 4 3
- Kozak, Lukas
- Rating Change
1813±87 − 2 = 1811±79 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1598±47
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 12 8 5 3
- −9
- 2027±70
- Campbell-Innes, Claire
- 7 4 9 10
- 0
- 1389±39
- Dequina, Jordan
- 6 9 10
- 0
- 921±63
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 3 3 3
- Lander, Benjamin
- Rating Change
1400±200 − 429 = 971±99 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 656±114
- Dequina, Gabby
- −2 −4 11 5 5
- −367
- 952±54
- Parrott, Kingsley
- 3 2 2
- −55
- 1113±36
- Fourro, Brett
- 6 2 7
- −15
- 1176±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 4 2 2
- Lander, Nicole
- Rating Change
776±135 − 121 = 655±107 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −94
- 687±112
- Tucker, Radana
- 8 11 6
- −26
- 827±60
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- 9 7 8
- 0
- 1151±55
- Engstrom, Judith
- 4 2 9
- 0
- 1257±42
- Willis, Kathy
- 3 1 3
- 0
- 1311±48
- Yu, Jan
- 7 3 4
- 0
- 1610±65
- Barnett, Helen
- 3 10 7
- Lander, Peter
- Rating Change
1881±73 − 24 = 1857±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1652±43
- Fourro, John
- 8 9 12
- −25
- 1900±72
- Jeffress, Anthony
- 9 −11 −3 7 6
- +1
- 1528±93
- Mulley, Mark
- 4 3 6
- −5
- 2049±74
- Bakanay, Seref
- 7 4 4 5
- 0
- 1476±42
- Chappell, Tavis
- 5 6 −11 1
- 0
- 1414±49
- Buckland, Virgoe
- 4 6 9
- 0
- 1307±51
- Ng, Kwong
- 5 7 −10 3
- 0
- 655±114
- Dequina, Gabby
- 5 3 2
- Lander, Zabrynn
- Rating Change
730±93 + 11 = 741±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +48
- 881±102
- Childs, Misae
- 3 11 7
- −19*
- 822±62
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- −7 3 11 9
- +19
- 685±57
- Lane, Stephen
- 6 9 4
- −19*
- 822±62
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- 5 −9 −13 6 10
- −12
- 835±91
- Liu, Heidi
- 5 −11 3 1
- −4
- 915±65
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 8 −7 14 −9 14
- −1
- 1047±79
- Martin, Ashley
- 6 −7 0 4
- Lane, Gavin
- Rating Change
1791±72 − 141 = 1650±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +2
- 1338±111
- Wu, Mike
- 9 −6 8 8
- −67
- 1273±47
- Gould, Benjamin
- 10 11 −6 −9 11
- +1
- 1303±51
- Yang, Jim
- 2 8 9
- −60
- 1326±43
- Opatrny, George
- −7 5 5 −8 9
- 0
- 1277±43
- Jorgensen, David
- 6 9 7
- −17
- 1716±50
- Duffy, Jake
- −9 9 6 0
- 0
- 672±56
- Lane, Stephen
- 4 6 4
- Lane, Stephen
- Rating Change
695±59 − 30 = 665±55 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −17
- 719±67
- Lander, Zabrynn
- 6 9 4
- −9
- 767±103
- Childs, Misae
- 5 8 10
- −2
- 917±65
- Alcorn, Daniel
- −9 2 7 4
- −1
- 1029±132
- Nethercott, Scott
- 5 5 3
- 0
- 1073±88
- Yep, Damien
- 12 9 5
- 0
- 1157±58
- Ratnan, Jim
- 3 5 4
- 0
- 1303±51
- Yang, Jim
- 1 6 4
- 0
- 1334±43
- Oakley, Ian
- 3 4 6
- 0
- 1359±53
- Opatrny, George
- 3 4 7
- 0
- 1649±59
- Lane, Gavin
- 4 6 4
- Levis, Bruno
- Rating Change
2388±80 + 0 = 2388±77 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 2048±64
- Townsend, Kane
- 7 6 3 6
- −3
- 2688±54
- Henzell, William
- 9 −8 6 −10 7 2
- +1
- 2033±70
- Campbell-Innes, Claire
- 4 8 6 9
- 0
- 1636±64
- Buermeyer, Hinrich
- 7 7 1
- Lim, Lillian
- Rating Change
970±131 − 26 = 944±91 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +73
- 952±91
- Tran, Michael
- 2 −4 5 −4 9
- −99
- 911±45
- Tran, Cong
- 4 9 9
- Liu, Heidi
- Rating Change
779±93 + 88 = 867±87 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +65
- 867±61
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- 6 7 3
- +23
- 759±65
- Lander, Zabrynn
- 5 −11 3 1
- Martin, Ashley
- Rating Change
1052±92 + 0 = 1052±80 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 844±59
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- 9 3 9
- −8
- 1299±60
- Parrott, Ashley
- 8 11 4
- +2
- 741±62
- Lander, Zabrynn
- 6 −7 0 4
- −3
- 1358±53
- Opatrny, George
- 9 3 7
- McCosh, David
- Rating Change
1360±104 − 67 = 1293±81 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −58
- 1325±66
- Yu, Peng
- 13 9 9
- −9
- 1510±93
- Mulley, Mark
- 7 −8 9 8
- McShane, Brian Michael Mick
- Rating Change
1032±158 − 9 = 1023±150 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −10
- 1420±62
- Hill, Ron
- 6 7 5
- Meyn, Jackson
- Rating Change
858±126 + 96 = 954±81 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +108
- 1002±56
- Parrott, Kingsley
- −12 7 10 5
- −23
- 1049±108
- Roesen, Paul
- 11 −6 7 −8 5
- +14
- 776±98
- Tucker, Radana
- 8 2 7
- −3
- 1206±51
- Reus, Nathan
- 7 7 6
- 0
- 1471±41
- O’Neill, Daniel
- −7 8 6 8
- Mitchell, Stephen
- Rating Change
1774±60 − 7 = 1767±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1451±47
- Engstrom, David
- 6 8 8
- −8
- 1914±73
- Jeffress, Anthony
- 9 7 9
- 0
- 1350±62
- Yu, Peng
- 4 6 9
- Momokawa, Ko
- Rating Change
1498±77 − 25 = 1473±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1128±72
- Foessel, Max
- 8 6 9
- −26
- 1535±55
- Nomura, Takashi
- 3 5 7
- Morley, Jackson
- Rating Change
1252±84 − 29 = 1223±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1082±152
- Takaraingi, Connor
- 3 4 5
- −42
- 1223±48
- Zhang, Jason
- 8 4 9
- +2
- 922±64
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 9 8 4
- 0
- 1737±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 5 5 4
- Mulley, Mark
- Rating Change
1600±200 − 82 = 1518±88 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +88
- 1417±49
- Buckland, Virgoe
- −7 9 7 7
- −215
- 1439±45
- So, Tsz Chiu Anakin
- −9 12 −6 12 6
- +25
- 1354±63
- Yu, Peng
- 3 3 3
- −2
- 1854±60
- Lander, Peter
- 4 3 6
- +11
- 1309±52
- Ng, Kwong
- 7 8 −8 6
- +10
- 1307±86
- McCosh, David
- 7 −8 9 8
- Nethercott, Scott
- Rating Change
1280±217 − 226 = 1054±125 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 672±56
- Lane, Stephen
- 5 5 3
- −212
- 1141±59
- Ratnan, Jim
- 5 2 8
- −16
- 1329±43
- Oakley, Ian
- 9 2 1
- −5
- 1414±62
- Hill, Ron
- −2 6 7 11
- Ng, Kwong
- Rating Change
1314±60 − 6 = 1308±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +11
- 1235±44
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- 8 8 8
- −11
- 1406±50
- Buckland, Virgoe
- 9 7 7
- +2
- 1093±70
- Van Zelst, Andrew
- 5 6 −5 7
- −5
- 1472±39
- Tran, Thanh
- 6 −8 9 −8 6
- −3
- 1516±93
- Mulley, Mark
- 7 8 −8 6
- 0
- 1812±78
- Schull, Daniel
- 6 3 5
- 0
- 1858±59
- Lander, Peter
- 5 7 −10 3
- Ng, Wee Meng Tony
- Rating Change
1105±91 + 106 = 1211±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +79
- 1390±62
- Wiese, Brian
- −8 −5 9 9 8
- −10
- 1299±52
- Yang, Jim
- −14 13 6 8
- +51
- 1339±50
- Yu, Jan
- 5 9 10
- −8
- 1301±44
- Bartley, Robert
- 10 −10 11 11
- −5
- 1350±87
- Goltz, Jason
- 7 6 4
- −1
- 1423±47
- Ninnes, Craig
- 4 5 −10 8
- 0
- 1558±87
- Collado, Jan
- 6 10 7
- Ninnes, Craig
- Rating Change
1391±59 + 31 = 1422±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +29
- 1490±40
- Tran, Thanh
- −9 10 10 14
- −12
- 1440±123
- Koschemann, Marc
- 5 4 3
- +22
- 1472±51
- Engstrom, David
- −7 −11 5 8 7
- −10
- 1457±94
- Taylor, Tereza
- 5 −5 4 6
- +7
- 1320±50
- Yu, Jan
- −13 4 4 7
- −4
- 1538±41
- Thomas, Rhys
- −9 5 9 −7 5
- +2
- 1209±62
- Ng, Wee Meng Tony
- 4 5 −10 8
- −2
- 1593±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 8 7 9
- Nomura, Takashi
- Rating Change
1552±67 + 10 = 1562±52 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1626±102
- Collado, Jan
- 8 5 5
- −29
- 1530±42
- Thomas, Rhys
- 7 −10 8 3
- +13
- 1499±77
- Momokawa, Ko
- 3 5 7
- −3
- 1736±66
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- 7 −10 5 −5 8
- +4
- 1392±40
- Dequina, Jordan
- 5 8 6
- 0
- 2170±75
- Townsend, Wade
- 8 5 3
- 0
- 1127±71
- Foessel, Max
- 9 6 3
- 0
- 979±53
- Parrott, Kingsley
- 8 4 6
- 0
- 921±85
- Tran, Michael
- 9 2 5
- O’Neill, Daniel
- Rating Change
1472±46 + 11 = 1483±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +13
- 1551±108
- Ono, Kohei
- −7 7 7 5
- −15
- 1444±47
- Hay, Kenneth
- 3 10 −4 7
- +9
- 1445±70
- Hill, Ron
- 6 −6 8 9
- 0
- 2689±53
- Henzell, William
- 3 5 1
- +4
- 1370±60
- Opatrny, George
- 3 −8 6 10
- 0
- 1068±103
- Roesen, Paul
- 6 5 7
- 0
- 950±86
- Meyn, Jackson
- −7 8 6 8
- Oakley, Ian
- Rating Change
1313±46 + 18 = 1331±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +17
- 1377±64
- Wiese, Brian
- −8 9 4 11
- −5
- 1446±48
- Engstrom, David
- −10 8 2 3
- +3
- 1164±60
- Ratnan, Jim
- 2 −10 7 5
- 0
- 1812±78
- Schull, Daniel
- 5 4 7
- +2
- 1128±68
- Vickers, Bill
- 9 7 4
- +1
- 1052±131
- Nethercott, Scott
- 9 2 1
- 0
- 672±56
- Lane, Stephen
- 3 4 6
- Ono, Kohei
- Rating Change
1400±200 + 78 = 1478±87 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +187
- 1610±51
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 4 5 −9 −8 9
- −106
- 1467±41
- O’Neill, Daniel
- −7 7 7 5
- +19
- 1311±61
- Parrott, Ashley
- 8 −8 6 5
- −22
- 1544±89
- Collado, Jan
- 12 6 6
- 0
- 2689±53
- Henzell, William
- 2 5 4
- Opatrny, George
- Rating Change
1250±53 + 110 = 1360±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +36
- 1700±59
- Lane, Gavin
- −7 5 5 −8 9
- −3
- 1448±45
- So, Tsz Chiu Anakin
- 8 4 1
- +32
- 1576±89
- Sung, James
- 7 8 −9 9
- −2
- 1458±48
- Hay, Kenneth
- 3 8 8
- +17
- 1338±64
- Parrott, Ashley
- −4 2 9 6
- −2
- 1470±41
- O’Neill, Daniel
- 3 −8 6 10
- +15
- 1328±54
- Yang, Jim
- 7 6 −9 6
- 0
- 1595±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 6 5 −9 6
- +11
- 1292±44
- Jorgensen, David
- 8 2 −10 5
- 0
- 1636±64
- Buermeyer, Hinrich
- 6 7 2
- +6
- 1240±45
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- 5 2 −14 5
- 0
- 1650±42
- Fourro, John
- 10 1 7
- +1
- 1059±84
- Martin, Ashley
- 9 3 7
- 0
- 1742±65
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- 3 4 5
- 0
- 946±146
- James, Jim
- 7 8 3
- 0
- 1812±78
- Schull, Daniel
- 11 5 7
- 0
- 672±56
- Lane, Stephen
- 3 4 7
- Parrott, Ashley
- Rating Change
1348±70 − 33 = 1315±59 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +4
- 1091±69
- Van Zelst, Andrew
- 9 11 −9 3
- −28
- 1344±50
- Opatrny, George
- −4 2 9 6
- +2
- 1053±80
- Martin, Ashley
- 8 11 4
- −9
- 1444±101
- Ono, Kohei
- 8 −8 6 5
- −1
- 1594±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- −9 8 −9 4 3
- 0
- 2057±72
- Bakanay, Seref
- 9 8 2
- Parrott, Kingsley
- Rating Change
958±73 + 9 = 967±50 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +33
- 1062±108
- Lander, Benjamin
- 3 2 2
- −38
- 843±106
- Tran, Michael
- 8 3 8
- +21
- 944±68
- Alcorn, Daniel
- −9 4 9 11
- −25
- 882±104
- Meyn, Jackson
- −12 7 10 5
- +17
- 932±45
- Tran, Cong
- 2 −6 −8 10 5
- −1
- 1184±38
- Dahl, Olav
- −7 8 5 3
- +3
- 762±98
- Tucker, Radana
- 8 5 −11 7
- −1
- 1205±51
- Reus, Nathan
- 2 −8 5 2
- +1
- 662±116
- Dequina, Gabby
- 5 4 9
- 0
- 1389±39
- Dequina, Jordan
- 6 6 5
- 0
- 1548±53
- Nomura, Takashi
- 8 4 6
- 0
- 1595±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 6 9 6
- Patane, Mark
- Rating Change
1229±56 − 7 = 1222±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 795±88
- Fourro, Scott
- 2 4 5
- −5
- 1387±40
- Dequina, Jordan
- 8 10 12
- −2
- 1449±48
- Engstrom, David
- −8 5 6 3
- 0
- 1737±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 6 5 2
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- Rating Change
1184±56 + 61 = 1245±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +31
- 1371±60
- Jenkins, Mike
- 9 6 7
- −9
- 1279±57
- Polkinghorne, Ian
- 7 4 3
- +22
- 1292±58
- Barnett, Morgan
- 9 6 5
- −6
- 1300±53
- Ng, Kwong
- 8 8 8
- +10
- 1184±75
- Smith, Fred
- 9 6 6
- −3
- 1355±52
- Opatrny, George
- 5 2 −14 5
- +8
- 1169±57
- Engstrom, Judith
- 7 −11 6 6
- 0
- 1812±78
- Schull, Daniel
- 2 3 3
- +6
- 1156±109
- James, Blake
- 5 6 4
- +4
- 1108±102
- Yep, Damien
- 2 −9 10 8
- Polkinghorne, Ian
- Rating Change
1224±75 + 71 = 1295±53 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +34
- 1273±82
- Dinsey, Gregory
- 3 −8 9 3
- −5
- 1448±48
- Engstrom, David
- 8 9 3
- +22
- 1241±45
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- 7 4 3
- 0
- 1634±67
- Kilmister, Paul
- 3 3 5
- +14
- 1224±58
- Reus, Nathan
- −9 −11 4 5 6
- 0
- 1650±42
- Fourro, John
- 5 4 5
- +5
- 1136±69
- Vickers, Bill
- −5 5 11 11
- 0
- 925±87
- Tran, Michael
- 12 5 7
- Ratnan, Jim
- Rating Change
1091±79 + 66 = 1157±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +57
- 1278±43
- Willis, Kathy
- 7 5 7
- −16
- 1200±52
- Reus, Nathan
- 5 5 5
- +19
- 1156±129
- Roesen, Paul
- 1 7 3
- −7
- 1266±103
- Battilana, Michael
- 8 10 9
- +14
- 1135±140
- Nethercott, Scott
- 5 2 8
- −2
- 1333±43
- Oakley, Ian
- 2 −10 7 5
- +2
- 925±44
- Tran, Cong
- 5 7 4
- −1
- 1420±62
- Hill, Ron
- 6 10 7
- 0
- 672±56
- Lane, Stephen
- 3 5 4
- 0
- 1460±48
- Hay, Kenneth
- 11 4 5
- Rawlings, Jason
- Rating Change
1572±46 − 9 = 1563±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +5
- 1456±49
- Engstrom, David
- 9 −10 8 4
- −15
- 1484±100
- Collado, Jan
- 6 −8 9 −7 10
- Reus, Nathan
- Rating Change
1184±60 + 35 = 1219±49 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1183±75
- Smith, Fred
- 8 6 −9 8
- −11
- 1279±57
- Polkinghorne, Ian
- −9 −11 4 5 6
- +15
- 1178±62
- Ratnan, Jim
- 5 5 5
- 0
- 1595±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 7 8 5
- +10
- 1155±109
- James, Blake
- 6 1 6
- +2
- 982±54
- Parrott, Kingsley
- 2 −8 5 2
- +2
- 957±90
- Meyn, Jackson
- 7 7 6
- 0
- 750±94
- Tucker, Radana
- 2 7 5
- Roesen, Paul
- Rating Change
1151±192 − 57 = 1094±95 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +58
- 962±88
- Meyn, Jackson
- 11 −6 7 −8 5
- −126
- 1145±59
- Ratnan, Jim
- 1 7 3
- +23
- 925±44
- Tran, Cong
- 4 7 9
- −10
- 1345±87
- Goltz, Jason
- −10 5 5 0
- −1
- 1470±41
- O’Neill, Daniel
- 6 5 7
- Schull, Daniel
- Rating Change
1810±78 + 3 = 1813±77 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1*
- 1461±49
- Hay, Kenneth
- 7 7 6
- +1*
- 1461±49
- Hay, Kenneth
- 1 6 1
- +1
- 1451±47
- Engstrom, David
- 8 2 −9 9
- 0
- 1359±53
- Opatrny, George
- 11 5 7
- 0
- 1334±43
- Oakley, Ian
- 5 4 7
- 0
- 1307±51
- Ng, Kwong
- 6 3 5
- 0
- 1229±42
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- 2 3 3
- 0
- 1122±66
- Vickers, Bill
- 6 4 5
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- Rating Change
854±88 − 8 = 846±56 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +21
- 781±101
- Tucker, Radana
- 8 9 6
- −43
- 809±89
- Liu, Heidi
- 6 7 3
- +13*
- 761±67
- Lander, Zabrynn
- −7 3 11 9
- −16
- 915±45
- Tran, Cong
- −14 6 −6 9 9
- +13*
- 761±67
- Lander, Zabrynn
- 5 −9 −13 6 10
- −4
- 1040±81
- Martin, Ashley
- 9 3 9
- +8
- 716±120
- Lander, Nicole
- 9 7 8
- −1
- 1151±55
- Engstrom, Judith
- 11 −10 5 7
- 0
- 1185±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 4 −7 9 2
- 0
- 1262±50
- Barnett, Morgan
- 1 8 7
- 0
- 2032±69
- Campbell-Innes, Claire
- 2 3 1
- Smith, Fred
- Rating Change
1207±110 − 48 = 1159±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +46
- 1199±68
- Barnett, Jesse
- 7 6 −9 10
- −60
- 1193±52
- Reus, Nathan
- 8 6 −9 8
- 0
- 656±114
- Dequina, Gabby
- 7 9 4
- −27
- 1220±43
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- 9 6 6
- −7
- 1323±56
- Jenkins, Mike
- 5 4 6
- So, Tsz Chiu Anakin
- Rating Change
1444±49 + 23 = 1467±45 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +22
- 1658±125
- Mulley, Mark
- −9 12 −6 12 6
- −5
- 1592±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 8 8 9
- +7
- 1373±61
- Opatrny, George
- 8 4 1
- −3
- 1631±66
- Buermeyer, Hinrich
- 8 10 8
- +1
- 1239±47
- Zhang, Jason
- 8 4 −5 4
- 0
- 1153±55
- Engstrom, Judith
- 3 10 7
- Strack, Andrea
- Rating Change
1123±75 + 125 = 1248±91 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +90*
- 1502±67
- Whisson, Jill
- −6 9 8 −9 8
- 0*
- 1502±67
- Whisson, Jill
- −9 4 6 9
- +34
- 1175±56
- Engstrom, Judith
- 7 −8 −2 10 9
- +1
- 806±92
- Childs, Misae
- 9 −7 6 4
- Sung, James
- Rating Change
1576±89 − 87 = 1489±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 934±138
- James, Jim
- 8 3 6
- −88
- 1330±45
- Opatrny, George
- 7 8 −9 9
- Takaraingi, Connor
- Rating Change
1200±200 − 166 = 1034±136 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- −125
- 1214±71
- Morley, Jackson
- 3 4 5
- −41
- 1230±47
- Zhang, Jason
- 5 5 3
- Taylor, Tereza
- Rating Change
1600±200 − 123 = 1477±82 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +92
- 1427±47
- Ninnes, Craig
- 5 −5 4 6
- −194
- 1436±109
- Koschemann, Marc
- 11 7 9
- +19
- 1313±48
- Yu, Jan
- −8 2 6 8
- −48
- 1534±41
- Thomas, Rhys
- 11 6 8
- +7
- 1259±43
- Willis, Kathy
- 10 5 4
- 0
- 2030±69
- Campbell-Innes, Claire
- 3 2 4 6
- Thomas, Rhys
- Rating Change
1514±51 + 39 = 1553±40 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +14
- 1609±143
- Koschemann, Marc
- 8 7 10
- −9
- 1588±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 7 5 −10 4
- +17
- 1575±60
- Nomura, Takashi
- 7 −10 8 3
- −6
- 1625±67
- Buermeyer, Hinrich
- −5 6 6 10
- +10
- 1558±114
- Taylor, Tereza
- 11 6 8
- −1
- 1739±66
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- −7 8 9 −2 9
- +8
- 1482±40
- Tran, Thanh
- 10 6 9
- 0
- 2032±69
- Campbell-Innes, Claire
- 10 −8 9 6
- +4
- 1432±49
- Ninnes, Craig
- −9 5 9 −7 5
- +2
- 1393±40
- Dequina, Jordan
- 9 2 10
- 0
- 1185±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 5 7 5
- 0
- 1127±72
- Foessel, Max
- 10 5 5
- 0
- 921±63
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 6 1 5
- Townsend, Kane
- Rating Change
2047±64 − 1 = 2046±62 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +1
- 1738±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 4 11 −11 6 4
- −1
- 2386±78
- Levis, Bruno
- 7 6 3 6
- 0
- 1303±43
- Bartley, Robert
- 6 1 4
- 0
- 1185±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 1 7 5
- Townsend, Wade
- Rating Change
2164±76 + 6 = 2170±75 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +7
- 1970±81
- Goedeke, Mark
- −7 −10 5 4 11 6
- 0
- 2689±53
- Henzell, William
- 3 5 3 11
- 0
- 1559±86
- Collado, Jan
- 9 −6 2 3
- 0
- 1548±53
- Nomura, Takashi
- 8 5 3
- Tran, Cong
- Rating Change
922±53 + 6 = 928±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +18
- 1034±108
- Lim, Lillian
- 4 9 9
- −18
- 889±69
- Alcorn, Daniel
- −7 9 8 −4 6
- +15
- 983±96
- Tran, Michael
- 3 −5 4 −7 8
- −10
- 965±56
- Parrott, Kingsley
- 2 −6 −8 10 5
- +7
- 854±62
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- −14 6 −6 9 9
- −5
- 1032±117
- Roesen, Paul
- 4 7 9
- −1
- 1155±59
- Ratnan, Jim
- 5 7 4
- 0
- 1306±48
- Gould, Benjamin
- 4 2 9
- 0
- 1595±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 3 7 2
- Tran, Michael
- Rating Change
1000±150 − 86 = 914±83 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +93
- 990±55
- Parrott, Kingsley
- 8 3 8
- −120
- 877±116
- Lim, Lillian
- 2 −4 5 −4 9
- −59
- 911±45
- Tran, Cong
- 3 −5 4 −7 8
- −1
- 1286±55
- Polkinghorne, Ian
- 12 5 7
- 0
- 1389±40
- Dequina, Jordan
- 9 −7 9 7
- 0
- 1548±53
- Nomura, Takashi
- 9 2 5
- Tran, Thanh
- Rating Change
1487±47 − 11 = 1476±38 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +8
- 1424±53
- Buckland, Virgoe
- 6 5 5
- −20
- 1402±48
- Ninnes, Craig
- −9 10 10 14
- +4
- 1352±135
- Fazel, Amin
- 2 9 10
- −7
- 1533±42
- Thomas, Rhys
- 10 6 9
- +2
- 1310±53
- Ng, Kwong
- 6 −8 9 −8 6
- −1
- 1736±49
- Duffy, Jake
- 8 5 6
- +2
- 1309±50
- Gould, Benjamin
- −10 −7 6 9 10
- −1
- 1740±65
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- 8 −11 9 7
- 0
- 1185±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 3 3 −10 4
- 0
- 1089±69
- Van Zelst, Andrew
- 5 7 8
- 0
- 921±63
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 7 6 2
- Tucker, Radana
- Rating Change
800±150 − 52 = 748±92 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +54
- 721±116
- Lander, Nicole
- 8 11 6
- −81
- 827±60
- Siedofsky, Krystal
- 8 9 6
- −18
- 932±92
- Meyn, Jackson
- 8 2 7
- −8
- 974±54
- Parrott, Kingsley
- 8 5 −11 7
- 0
- 1206±51
- Reus, Nathan
- 2 7 5
- Van Zelst, Andrew
- Rating Change
1093±97 − 9 = 1084±68 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +80
- 1260±50
- Zhang, Jason
- 4 −7 7 11
- −58
- 1015±100
- Yep, Damien
- 10 11 7
- +3
- 800±90
- Fourro, Scott
- 4 2 9
- −28
- 1100±75
- Foessel, Max
- 6 7 9
- −3
- 1298±61
- Parrott, Ashley
- 9 11 −9 3
- −2
- 1304±52
- Ng, Kwong
- 5 6 −5 7
- 0
- 1474±39
- Tran, Thanh
- 5 7 8
- 0
- 1742±65
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- 8 5 1
- 0
- 2057±72
- Bakanay, Seref
- 5 3 1
- Vickers, Bill
- Rating Change
1147±105 − 12 = 1135±66 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +44
- 1128±37
- Fourro, Brett
- 8 −8 11 8
- −45
- 1179±38
- Dahl, Olav
- 9 −18 7 −3 10
- +5
- 925±65
- Alcorn, Daniel
- 6 5 5
- −11
- 1282±56
- Polkinghorne, Ian
- −5 5 11 11
- −5
- 1332±43
- Oakley, Ian
- 9 7 4
- −1
- 1459±48
- Hay, Kenneth
- 5 −12 4 9
- 0
- 1812±78
- Schull, Daniel
- 6 4 5
- Whisson, Jill
- Rating Change
1572±75 − 125 = 1447±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0*
- 1158±73
- Strack, Andrea
- −9 4 6 9
- −72
- 1106±58
- Engstrom, Judith
- 9 7 −6 −5 7
- 0
- 802±90
- Childs, Misae
- 8 6 6
- −54*
- 1158±73
- Strack, Andrea
- −6 9 8 −9 8
- Wiese, Brian
- Rating Change
1396±82 − 60 = 1336±57 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +26
- 1312±53
- Yang, Jim
- 3 3 9
- −74
- 1151±70
- Ng, Wee Meng Tony
- −8 −5 9 9 8
- +17
- 1282±44
- Jorgensen, David
- −8 −9 9 9 6
- −30
- 1319±44
- Oakley, Ian
- −8 9 4 11
- 0
- 1923±72
- Jeffress, Anthony
- 9 6 9
- Willis, Kathy
- Rating Change
1333±50 − 85 = 1248±42 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- 0
- 686±112
- Lander, Nicole
- 3 1 3
- −31
- 1109±59
- Engstrom, Judith
- 8 9 −5 −8 10
- −27
- 1112±60
- Ratnan, Jim
- 7 5 7
- −11*
- 1272±53
- Yu, Jan
- 9 6 10
- −11*
- 1272±53
- Yu, Jan
- −8 9 7 −6 5
- −3
- 1407±65
- Hill, Ron
- −8 10 −9 8 8
- −2
- 1469±92
- Taylor, Tereza
- 10 5 4
- 0
- 1609±66
- Barnett, Helen
- 7 −7 9 9
- Wu, Mike
- Rating Change
1200±200 + 112 = 1312±109 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +160
- 1285±43
- Jorgensen, David
- 11 −9 −9 11 11
- −46
- 1448±48
- Engstrom, David
- 9 4 4
- −3
- 1648±59
- Lane, Gavin
- 9 −6 8 8
- 0
- 1961±74
- Goedeke, Mark
- 11 5 10
- Yamamoto, Naoya
- Rating Change
1764±82 − 15 = 1749±63 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +38
- 1750±52
- Duffy, Jake
- 7 6 8
- −71
- 1574±42
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 10 −9 6 −9 4
- +8
- 1571±92
- Collado, Jan
- 3 6 9
- +5
- 1551±55
- Nomura, Takashi
- 7 −10 5 −5 8
- +4
- 1543±41
- Thomas, Rhys
- −7 8 9 −2 9
- +2
- 1475±39
- Tran, Thanh
- 8 −11 9 7
- 0
- 1359±53
- Opatrny, George
- 3 4 5
- 0
- 1306±48
- Gould, Benjamin
- 4 10 −8 7
- 0
- 1127±71
- Foessel, Max
- 5 7 −11 6
- 0
- 1089±69
- Van Zelst, Andrew
- 8 5 1
- Yang, Jim
- Rating Change
1340±61 − 38 = 1302±48 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +9
- 1213±63
- Ng, Wee Meng Tony
- −14 13 6 8
- −22
- 1305±93
- Goltz, Jason
- 7 −4 2 7
- +6
- 1186±67
- Barnett, Jesse
- 7 1 −9 5
- −18
- 1322±60
- Wiese, Brian
- 3 3 9
- 0
- 672±56
- Lane, Stephen
- 1 6 4
- −13
- 1345±50
- Opatrny, George
- 7 6 −9 6
- 0
- 1648±59
- Lane, Gavin
- 2 8 9
- Yep, Damien
- Rating Change
1037±116 + 57 = 1094±86 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +75
- 1119±69
- Van Zelst, Andrew
- 10 11 7
- −19
- 1226±43
- Poldervaart, Pieter
- 2 −9 10 8
- +1
- 673±56
- Lane, Stephen
- 12 9 5
- Yu, Jan
- Rating Change
1317±61 − 14 = 1303±47 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +15*
- 1272±45
- Willis, Kathy
- 9 6 10
- −38
- 1155±70
- Ng, Wee Meng Tony
- 5 9 10
- +15*
- 1272±45
- Willis, Kathy
- −8 9 7 −6 5
- −6
- 1417±48
- Ninnes, Craig
- −13 4 4 7
- +5
- 1157±56
- Engstrom, Judith
- 9 4 7
- −4
- 1472±91
- Taylor, Tereza
- −8 2 6 8
- 0
- 686±112
- Lander, Nicole
- 7 3 4
- −1
- 1609±66
- Barnett, Helen
- 6 −9 −8 5 6
- Yu, Peng
- Rating Change
1343±72 + 1 = 1344±60 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +23
- 1346±98
- McCosh, David
- 13 9 9
- −15
- 1444±48
- Engstrom, David
- 8 6 −7 5
- −6
- 1512±93
- Mulley, Mark
- 3 3 3
- 0
- 1766±56
- Mitchell, Stephen
- 4 6 9
- Zhang, Jason
- Rating Change
1236±55 − 2 = 1234±46 - Wins
- Losses
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- Point
Change - Opponent’s
Rating - Opponent
- Score
- +19
- 1270±82
- Morley, Jackson
- 8 4 9
- −33
- 1018±81
- Van Zelst, Andrew
- 4 −7 7 11
- +9
- 1164±57
- Engstrom, Judith
- −10 7 −9 9 6
- −1
- 1448±45
- So, Tsz Chiu Anakin
- 8 4 −5 4
- +5
- 1091±157
- Takaraingi, Connor
- 5 5 3
- 0
- 1595±45
- Houghton, Benjamin
- 3 8 6
- 0
- 795±88
- Fourro, Scott
- 5 −10 7 3
- Summary Report sorted by Name, Initial Rating, Point Change, Final Rating
- Output this page as CSV: Text, Attachment
Players: 102. Matches: 331. Club: Brisbane Table Tennis Association. Province: QLD. Country: Australia (AUS). Director: Scott, Derek. Sport: Table Tennis. Event ID: 8575. Submitted/revised: 2021-01-01 3:46 pm EST. Last processed: 2024-03-20 7:57 am EDT.